The Cardiorespiratory Demands of Treadmill Walking with and without the Use of Ekso GT™ within Able-Bodied Participants: A Feasibility Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
2.2. Anthropometric Measurements
2.3. Outcome Measures
2.3.1. Ekso GT™
2.3.2. Cardiorespiratory Measurements
2.3.3. Rate of Perceived Exertion
2.4. Treadmill Walking Protocols
2.4.1. Rest and Recovery
2.4.2. Treadmill Walking
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. RBP and RHR
3.2. O2·kg−1
3.3. CO2·kg−1
3.4. RER
3.5. E
3.6. HR
3.7. RPE
4. Discussion
4.1. Practical Implications
4.2. Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Correction Statement
References
- Bickenbach, J.; Officer, A.; Shakespeare, T.; von Groote, P. International Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury; World Health Organisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Wallin, M.; Culpepper, W.; Nichols, E.; Bhutta, Z.; Gebrehiwot, T.; Hay, S.; Khalil, I.; Krohn, K.; Liang, X.; Naghavi, M.; et al. Global, regional, and national burden of multiple sclerosis 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 269–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jørgensen, H. The Copenhagen Stroke Study experience. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 1996, 6, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garshick, E.; Kelley, A.; Cohen, S.; Garrison, A.; Tun, C.; Gagnon, D.; Brown, R. A prospective assessment of mortality in chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2005, 43, 408–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Charlifue, S.; Gerhart, K. Community integration in spinal cord injury of long duration. NeuroRehabilitation 2004, 19, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barker, R.; Kendall, M.; Amsters, D.; Pershouse, K.; Haines, T.; Kuipers, P. The relationship between quality of life and disability across the lifespan for people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2008, 47, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ginis, K.; Hicks, A.; Latimer, A.; Warburton, D.; Bourne, C.; Ditor, D.; Goodwin, D.; Hayes, K.; McCartney, N.; McIlraith, A.; et al. The development of evidence-informed physical activity guidelines for adults with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2011, 49, 1088–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motl, R. Physical Activity and Irreversible Disability in Multiple Sclerosis. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2010, 38, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tremblay, M.; Aubert, S.; Barnes, J.; Saunders, T.; Carson, V.; Latimer-Cheung, A.; Chastin, S.; Altenburg, T.; Chinapaw, M. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN)—Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2017, 14, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorgey, A.; Dolbow, D.; Dolbow, J.; Khalil, R.; Castillo, C.; Gater, D. Effects of spinal cord injury on body composition and metabolic profile—Part I. J. Spinal Cord Med. 2014, 37, 693–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozlowski, A.; Bryce, T.; Dijkers, M. Time and Effort Required by Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Learn to Use a Powered Exoskeleton for Assisted Walking. Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil. 2015, 21, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WHO Int. WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240015128 (accessed on 23 February 2021).
- Cahill, A.; Ginley, O.; Bertrand, C.; Lennon, O. Gym-based exoskeleton walking: A preliminary exploration of non-ambulatory end-user perspectives. Disabil. Health J. 2018, 11, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Escalona, M.; Brosseau, R.; Vermette, M.; Comtois, A.; Duclos, C.; Aubertin-Leheudre, M.; Gagnon, D. Cardiorespiratory demand and rate of perceived exertion during overground walking with a robotic exoskeleton in long-term manual wheelchair users with chronic spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study. Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2018, 61, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc. Ekso GT™ Robotic Exoskeleton Cleared by FDA for Use with Stroke and Spinal Cord Injury Patients. Available online: https://ir.eksobionics.com/press-releases/detail/570/ekso-gt-robotic-exoskeletoncleared-by-fda-for-use-with (accessed on 8 December 2021).
- Evans, N.; Hartigan, C.; Kandilakis, C.; Pharo, E.; Clesson, I. Acute Cardiorespiratory and Metabolic Responses during Exoskeleton-Assisted Walking Overground among Persons with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury. Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil. 2015, 21, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, S.; Kobetic, R.; Triolo, R. Effect of exoskeletal joint constraint and passive resistance on metabolic energy expenditure: Implications for walking in paraplegia. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maher, J.; Baunsgaard, C.; van Gerven, J.; Palermo, A.; Biering-Sorensen, F.; Mendex, A.; Irwin, R.; Nash, M. Differences in Acute Metabolic Responses to Bionic and Nonbionic Ambulation in Spinal Cord Injured Humans and Controls. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2020, 101, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, S.; Afzal, T.; Berliner, J.; Francisco, G. Exoskeleton-assisted gait training to improve gait in individuals with spinal cord injury: A pilot randomized study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018, 4, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McIntosh, K.; Charbonneau, R.; Bensaada, Y.; Bhatiya, U.; Ho, C. The Safety and Feasibility of Exoskeletal-Assisted Walking in Acute Rehabilitation after Spinal Cord Injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2020, 101, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milia, P.; De Salvo, F.; Caserio, M.; Cope, T.; Weber, P.; Santella, C.; Fiorini, S.; Baldoni, G.; Bruschi, R.; Bigazzi, B.; et al. Neurorehabilitation in paraplegic patients with an active powered exoskeleton (Ekso). Digit. Med. 2016, 2, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—Official Legal Text. Available online: https://gdpr-info.eu/ (accessed on 25 November 2021).
- Anderson, V.; Fontinha, R.; Robson, F. Research Methods in Human Resource Management, 4th ed.; Kogan Page: London, UK, 2019; p. 147. [Google Scholar]
- Borg, G.A.V. Physical Performance and Perceived Exertion; Lund University: Lund, Sweden, 1962. [Google Scholar]
- Broad, M.; Quint, M.; Thomas, S.; Twose, P. Cardiorespiratory Assessment of the Adult Patient—E-Book; Elsevier Ltd.: London, UK, 2012; p. 144. [Google Scholar]
- Birch, K.; George, K.; McLaren, D. BIOS Instant Notes in Sport and Exercise Physiology; Routledge: Milton, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Baechle, T.; Earle, R. Essentials of Strength Training & Conditioning, 3rd ed.; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2008; p. 37. [Google Scholar]
- Draper, N.; Hodgson, C. Adventure Sport Physiology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, A.; Mishra, P.; Pandey, C.; Singh, U.; Sahu, C.; Keshri, A. Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Ann. Card. Anaesth. 2019, 22, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asselin, P.; Knezevic, S.; Kornfeld, S.; Cirnigliaro, C.; Agranova-Breyter, I.; Bauman, W.; Spungen, A. Heart rate and oxygen demand of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in persons with paraplegia. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2015, 52, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pallant, J. SPSS Survival Manual, 6th ed.; Open University Press: Maidenhead, UK, 2016; pp. 665–666. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; L. Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Kressler, J.; Thomas, C.; Field-Fote, E.; Sanchez, J.; Widerström-Noga, E.; Cilien, D.; Grant, K.; Ginnety, K.; Gonzalez, H.; Martinez, A.; et al. Understanding Therapeutic Benefits of Overground Bionic Ambulation: Exploratory Case Series in Persons with Chronic, Complete Spinal Cord Injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2014, 95, 1878–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kressler, J.; Wymer, T.; Domingo, A. Respiratory, cardiovascular and metabolic responses during different modes of overground bionic ambulation in persons with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury: A case series. J. Rehabil. Med. 2018, 50, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Glass, S.; Dwyer, G. ACSM’s Metabolic Calculations Handbook; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007; p. 8. [Google Scholar]
- van Loon, L.; Greenhaff, P.; Constantin-Teodosiu, D.; Saris, W.; Wagenmakers, A. The effects of increasing exercise intensity on muscle fuel utilisation in humans. J. Physiol. 2001, 536, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Plowman, S.; Smith, D. Exercise Physiology for Health, Fitness, and Performance, 2nd ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2008; p. 86. [Google Scholar]
- Burgomaster, K.; Hughes, S.; Heigenhauser, G.; Bradwell, S.; Gibala, M. Six sessions of sprint interval training increases muscle oxidative potential and cycle endurance capacity in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005, 98, 1985–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gibala, M.; Little, J.; Van Essen, M.; Wilkin, G.; Burgomaster, K.; Safdar, A.; Raha, S.; Tarnopolsky, M. Short-term sprint intervalversustraditional endurance training: Similar initial adaptations in human skeletal muscle and exercise performance. J. Physiol. 2006, 575, 901–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burgomaster, K.; Howarth, K.; Phillips, S.; Rakobowchuk, M.; MacDonald, M.; McGee, S.; Gibala, M. Similar metabolic adaptations during exercise after low volume sprint interval and traditional endurance training in humans. J. Physiol. 2008, 586, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rakobowchuk, M.; Tanguay, S.; Burgomaster, K.; Howarth, K.; Gibala, M.; MacDonald, M. Sprint interval and traditional endurance training induce similar improvements in peripheral arterial stiffness and flow-mediated dilation in healthy humans. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2008, 295, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibala, M.; Little, J.; MacDonald, M.; Hawley, J. Physiological adaptations to low-volume, high-intensity interval training in health and disease. J. Physiol. 2012, 590, 1077–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, J.; Broeder, C.; Browder, K.; Panton, L. A comparison of interval vs. Steady-state exercise on substrate utilization in overweight women. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2002, 34, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Donovan, G.; Owen, A.; Bird, S.; Kearney, E.; Nevill, A.; Jones, D.; Woolf-May, K. Changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and coronary heart disease risk factors following 24 wk of moderate- or high-intensity exercise of equal energy cost. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005, 98, 1619–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Löllgen, H.; Böckenhoff, A.; Knapp, G. Physical Activity and All-cause Mortality: An Updated Meta-analysis with Different Intensity Categories. Int. J. Sports Med. 2009, 30, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bach Baunsgaard, C.; Vig Nissen, U.; Katrin Brust, A.; Frotzler, A.; Ribeill, C.; Kalke, Y.; Léon, N.; Gómex, B.; Samuelsson, K.; Antepohl, W.; et al. Gait training after spinal cord injury: Safety, feasibility and gait function following 8 weeks of training with the exoskeletons from Ekso Bionics. Spinal Cord 2018, 56, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Corbianco, S.; Cavallini, G.; Dini, M.; Franzoni, F.; D’Avino, C.; Gerini, A.; Stampacchia, G. Energy cost and psychological impact of robotic-assisted gait training in people with spinal cord injury: Effect of two different types of devices. Neurol. Sci. 2021, 42, 3357–3366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rampichini, S.; Guanziroli Ing, E.; Agnello, L.; Veicsteinas, A.; Molteni, F.; Merati, G. Energy cost of locomotion of robotic-assisted walking in paraplegics: A case report. Int. Phys. Med. Rehabil. J. 2018, 3, 216–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, S.; Lee, B.; Lee, H.; Kim, E.; Lee, J.; Yang, S.; Kim, T.; Pak, H.; Kim, H.; Kim, H.; et al. Energy Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction of Gait with Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis and Robot (ReWalk)-Assisted Gait in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury. Ann. Rehabil. Med. 2020, 44, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matabuena, M.; Vidal, J.; Hayes, P.; Saavedra-Garcia, M.; Trillo, F. Application of Functional Data Analysis for the Prediction of Maximum Heart Rate. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 121841–121852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Oliveira Segundo, V.H.; de Albuquerque, N.J.B.; Matos, F.; Dantas, P.M.S.; Pinto, E.F. Use of predictive equations of maximum heart rate for exercise prescription: A comparative study. IOSR J. Sports Phys. Educ. 2016, 3, 4–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esco, M.; Olson, M.; Williford, H.; Blessing, D.; Shannon, D.; Grandjean, P. The relationship between resting heart rate variability and heart rate recovery. Clin. Auton. Res. 2010, 20, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Correa Mesa, J.; Cruz Martinez, L.; Correa Morales, J.; Rojas Valencia, J. Maximum Heart Rate during exercise: Reliability of the 220-age and Tanaka formulas in healthy young people at a moderate altitude. Rev. Fac. Med. 2015, 62, 579–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milanović, Z.; Sporiš, G.; Weston, M. Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIT) and Continuous Endurance Training for VO2max Improvements: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials. Sports Med. 2015, 45, 1469–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soeria Santoso, D.; Boenyamin, H. The benefits and physiological changes of high intensity interval training. Univ. Med. 2019, 38, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, T.; Jessen, N.; Jørgensen, J.; Møller, N.; Lund, S. Dissecting adipose tissue lipolysis: Molecular regulation and implications for metabolic disease. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2014, 52, 199–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gutierrez, D.; Puglisi, M.; Hasty, A. Impact of increased adipose tissue mass on inflammation, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2009, 9, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boutcher, S. High-Intensity Intermittent Exercise and Fat Loss. J. Obes. 2011, 2011, 868305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- MacInnis, M.; Gibala, M. Physiological adaptations to interval training and the role of exercise intensity. J. Physiol. 2016, 595, 2915–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helgerud, J.; Høydal, K.; Wang, E.; Karlsen, T.; Berg, P.; Bjerkaas, M.; Simonsen, T.; Helgesen, C.; Njorth, N.; Bach, R.; et al. Aerobic High-Intensity Intervals Improve VO2max More Than Moderate Training. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2007, 39, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fletcher, G.; Balady, G.; Amsterdam, E.; Chaitman, B.; Eckel, R.; Fleg, J.; Froelicher, V.; Leon, A.; Piña, I.; Rodney, R.; et al. Exercise Standards for Testing and Training. Circulation 2001, 104, 1694–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raab, K.; Krakow, K.; Tripp, F.; Jung, M. Effects of training with the ReWalk exoskeleton on quality of life in incomplete spinal cord injury: A single case study. Spinal Cord Ser. Cases 2016, 2, 15025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, H.; Hayes, S.; White, M. The Effect of Using a Powered Exoskeleton Training Programme on Joint Range of Motion on Spinal Injured Individuals: A Pilot Study. Int. J. Phys. Ther. Rehabil 2015, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartigan, C.; Kandilakis, C.; Dalley, S.; Clausen, M.; Wilson, E.; Morrison, S.; Etheridge, S.; Farris, R. Mobility Outcomes Following Five Training Sessions with a Powered Exoskeleton. Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil. 2015, 21, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sale, P.; Russo, E.; Scarton, A.; Calabrò, R.; Masiero, S.; Filoni, S. Training for mobility with exoskeleton robot in spinal cord injury patients: A pilot study. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2018, 54, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wee, S.; Ho, C.; Tan, S.; Ong, C. Enhancing quality of life in progressive multiple sclerosis with powered robotic exoskeleton. Mult. Scler. J. 2020, 27, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stearns-Yoder, K.; Brenner, L. Novel Psychological Outcomes with Ekso Bionics Technology. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2018, 99, 70–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heinemann, A.; Jayaraman, A.; Mummidisetty, C.; Spraggins, J.; Pinto, D.; Charlifue, S.; Tefertiller, C.; Taylor, H.; Chang, S.; Stampas, A.; et al. Experience of Robotic Exoskeleton Use at Four Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Centers. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 2018, 42, 256–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heinemann, A.; Kinnett-Hopkins, D.; Mummidisetty, C.; Bond, R.; Ehrlich-Jones, L.; Furbish, C.; Field-Fote, E.; Jayaraman, A. Appraisals of robotic locomotor exoskeletons for gait: Focus group insights from potential users with spinal cord injuries. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2020, 15, 762–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thomas, J.; Silverman, S.; Nelson, J. Research Methods in Physical Activity, 6th ed.; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2011; pp. 104–118. [Google Scholar]
- Louie, D.; Eng, J. Powered robotic exoskeletons in post-stroke rehabilitation of gait: A scoping review. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2016, 13, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Row Lazzarini, B.; Kataras, T. Treadmill walking is not equivalent to overground walking for the study of walking smoothness and rhythmicity in older adults. Gait Posture 2016, 46, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karelis, A.; Carvalho, L.; Castillo, M.; Gagnon, D.; Aubertin-Leheudre, M. Effect on body composition and bone mineral density of walking with a robotic exoskeleton in adults with chronic spinal cord injury. J. Rehabil. Med. 2017, 49, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorgey, A.; Sumrell, R.; Goetz, L. 44. Exoskeleton Assisted Rehabilitation after Spinal Cord Injury. In Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices, 5th ed.; Webster, J., Murphy, D., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 440–447.e2. ISBN 9780323483230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Inclusion | Exclusion |
---|---|
≥18 and ≤70 years old | Any current contractures, fractures, or joint dislocations in the lower limbs. |
Neutral ankle dorsiflexion | Osteoporosis |
Passive range of motion (0–120° knee flexion; 0–90° hip flexion; 0–10° hip extension) | Body mass > 100 kg |
Height ≥ 157.5 cm ≤ 188 cm | Unequal leg length |
No orthopaedic or neurosurgery within the last six months | Unhealed skin lesions in the lower limbs |
Stable cardiorespiratory system | Thromboembolic or cardiorespiratory diseases |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Duddy, D.; Doherty, R.; Connolly, J.; Loughrey, J.; Condell, J.; Hassan, D.; Faulkner, M. The Cardiorespiratory Demands of Treadmill Walking with and without the Use of Ekso GT™ within Able-Bodied Participants: A Feasibility Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 6176. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106176
Duddy D, Doherty R, Connolly J, Loughrey J, Condell J, Hassan D, Faulkner M. The Cardiorespiratory Demands of Treadmill Walking with and without the Use of Ekso GT™ within Able-Bodied Participants: A Feasibility Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(10):6176. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106176
Chicago/Turabian StyleDuddy, Damien, Rónán Doherty, James Connolly, Johnny Loughrey, Joan Condell, David Hassan, and Maria Faulkner. 2022. "The Cardiorespiratory Demands of Treadmill Walking with and without the Use of Ekso GT™ within Able-Bodied Participants: A Feasibility Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 10: 6176. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106176