Next Article in Journal
Ecotoxicological Studies on the Effect of Roundup® (Glyphosate Formulation) on Marine Benthic Microalgae
Next Article in Special Issue
Identifying the Non-Traditional Safety Risk Paths of Employees from Chinese International Construction Companies in Africa
Previous Article in Journal
Diagnosis of Neonatal Late-Onset Infection in Very Preterm Infant: Inter-Observer Agreement and International Classifications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Safety Program Elements in the Construction Industry: The Case of Iraq
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current States and Future Trends in Safety Research of Construction Personnel: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Social Network Approach

School of System Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(3), 883; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030883
Submission received: 3 January 2021 / Revised: 13 January 2021 / Accepted: 18 January 2021 / Published: 20 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Occupational Safety and Risks in Construction)

Abstract

The construction industry is recognized as a high-risk industry given that safety accidents and personnel injuries frequently occur. This study provided a systematic and quantitative review of existing research achievements by conducting social network approach to identify current states and future trends for the occupational safety of construction personnel. A total of 250 peer-reviewed articles were collected to examine the research on safety issues of workers in construction industry. Social network approach was applied to analyze the interrelationship among authors, keywords, and citations of these articles using VOS viewer and CitNetExplorer. A knowledge structure map was drawn using main path analysis (MPA) towards the collected papers, which was implemented by Pajek. In line with the findings of social network analysis, five research groups, and six keyword themes were identified in accordance with the times of cooperation of researchers and correlation among keywords of the papers. Core papers were identified by using main path analysis for each research domain to represent the key process and backbone for the corresponding area. Based on the finding of the research, significant implications and insights in terms of current research status and further research trends were provided for the scholars, thus helping generate a targeted development plan for occupational safety in construction industry.
Keywords: construction industry; safety research; social network; main path analysis; literature review construction industry; safety research; social network; main path analysis; literature review
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meng, X.; Chan, A.H.S. Current States and Future Trends in Safety Research of Construction Personnel: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Social Network Approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030883

AMA Style

Meng X, Chan AHS. Current States and Future Trends in Safety Research of Construction Personnel: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Social Network Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(3):883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030883

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meng, Xiangcheng, and Alan H. S. Chan. 2021. "Current States and Future Trends in Safety Research of Construction Personnel: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Social Network Approach" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 3: 883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030883

APA Style

Meng, X., & Chan, A. H. S. (2021). Current States and Future Trends in Safety Research of Construction Personnel: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Social Network Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030883

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop