Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Continuous Low-Intensity Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields from Radio Base Stations to Cancer Mortality in Brazil
Next Article in Special Issue
Competency in Object Control Skills at an Early Age Benefit Future Movement Application: Longitudinal Data from the NW-CHILD Study
Previous Article in Journal
Pausing Mid-Sentence: An Ecological Model Approach to Language Disorder and Lived Experience of Young Male Offenders
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Relationships among Self-Worth Contingency on Others’ Approval, Appearance Comparisons on Facebook, and Adolescent Girls’ Body Esteem: A Cross-Cultural Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Heterogeneous Effects of Participation in Shadow Education on Mental Health of High School Students in Taiwan

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(3), 1222; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031222
by I-Chien Chen 1,* and Ping-Yin Kuan 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(3), 1222; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031222
Submission received: 6 January 2021 / Revised: 23 January 2021 / Accepted: 25 January 2021 / Published: 29 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Children and Young People’s Participation in Health and Well-Being)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors managed to focus on the various patterns of PSE participation and on the impacts of these patterns on the outcomes of school achievement and depression.

(1). In this study authors examined many variables, but the subject is very complex and cannot be restricted.

(2). So, the findings from the survey do not lead to concrete conclusions.

(3). It is interesting (and I think it is expected) that the always-takers have significantly higher depression symptoms in high school than the never-takers! 

(4). Results and discussion can trigger more research in the future.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The study on this topic is very interesting. The structure is clearly and logical and challenging.

The main goal of the study was analyzing the heterogeneous effect of private supplementary education (PSE) participation on school achievement and depression symptoms among high schoolers.

The research design and process seem to be adequate to the purpose and are clearly described in the text.

I think that the quality of the results discussion and conclusions could be improved. In the discussion section will be interesting bring to the discussion other studies and authors to support the findings.

What links can be established with previous studies?

How can the results be read considering the relevant literature on this topic?

Do the results corroborate or contradict previous studies?

The conclusions of the study need to be extended, pointed out the main conclusions and suggesting future research line to mitigate the methodological and context limitations.

What are the main conclusions of the study and what do they bring to this field again?

What are the main conclusions of the study and what is new for this field of research?

In the text, some limitations were pointed out by the authors in the discussion section. Taking these limitations in account what kind of link could be made with new research studies?

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop