Next Article in Journal
A New Pedestrian Crossing Level of Service (PCLOS) Method for Promoting Safe Pedestrian Crossing in Urban Areas
Next Article in Special Issue
Bayesian Design for Identifying Cohort-Specific Optimal Dose Combinations Based on Multiple Endpoints: Application to a Phase I Trial in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Process Improvement Approaches for Increasing the Response of Emergency Departments against the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adjustment for Baseline Covariates to Increase Efficiency in RCTs with Binary Endpoint: A Comparison of Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bayesian Sequential Monitoring of Single-Arm Trials: A Comparison of Futility Rules Based on Binary Data

by
Valeria Sambucini
Dipartimento di Scienze Statistiche, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(16), 8816; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168816
Submission received: 29 May 2021 / Revised: 30 July 2021 / Accepted: 31 July 2021 / Published: 20 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bayesian Design in Clinical Trials)

Abstract

In clinical trials, futility rules are widely used to monitor the study while it is in progress, with the aim of ensuring early termination if the experimental treatment is unlikely to provide the desired level of efficacy. In this paper, we focus on Bayesian strategies to perform interim analyses in single-arm trials based on a binary response variable. Designs that exploit both posterior and predictive probabilities are described and a slight modification of the futility rules is introduced when a fixed historical response rate is used, in order to add uncertainty in the efficacy probability of the standard treatment through the use of prior distributions. The stopping boundaries of the designs are compared under the same trial settings and simulation studies are performed to evaluate the operating characteristics when analogous procedures are used to calibrate the probability cut-offs of the different decision rules.
Keywords: Bayesian monitoring; futility rules; interim analysis; posterior and predictive probabilities; stopping boundaries Bayesian monitoring; futility rules; interim analysis; posterior and predictive probabilities; stopping boundaries

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sambucini, V. Bayesian Sequential Monitoring of Single-Arm Trials: A Comparison of Futility Rules Based on Binary Data. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8816. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168816

AMA Style

Sambucini V. Bayesian Sequential Monitoring of Single-Arm Trials: A Comparison of Futility Rules Based on Binary Data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(16):8816. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168816

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sambucini, Valeria. 2021. "Bayesian Sequential Monitoring of Single-Arm Trials: A Comparison of Futility Rules Based on Binary Data" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 16: 8816. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168816

APA Style

Sambucini, V. (2021). Bayesian Sequential Monitoring of Single-Arm Trials: A Comparison of Futility Rules Based on Binary Data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8816. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168816

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop