You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
  • Letter
  • Open Access

18 March 2020

Recent Trends and Future Direction of Dental Research in the Digital Era

,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
2
Department of Oral Health & Medicine, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
3
Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
4
Department of Prosthodontics & Dental Material, University School of Dental Medicine, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
This article belongs to the Special Issue Big Data in Dental Research and Oral Healthcare

Abstract

The digital transformation in dental medicine, based on electronic health data information, is recognized as one of the major game-changers of the 21st century to tackle present and upcoming challenges in dental and oral healthcare. This opinion letter focuses on the estimated top five trends and innovations of this new digital era, with potential to decisively influence the direction of dental research: (1) rapid prototyping (RP), (2) augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR), (3) artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), (4) personalized (dental) medicine, and (5) tele-healthcare. Digital dentistry requires managing expectations pragmatically and ensuring transparency for all stakeholders: patients, healthcare providers, university and research institutions, the medtech industry, insurance, public media, and state policy. It should not be claimed or implied that digital smart data technologies will replace humans providing dental expertise and the capacity for patient empathy. The dental team that controls digital applications remains the key and will continue to play the central role in treating patients. In this context, the latest trend word is created: augmented intelligence, e.g., the meaningful combination of digital applications paired with human qualities and abilities in order to achieve improved dental and oral healthcare, ensuring quality of life.

1. Introduction

Digital transformation is the ubiquitous catchword in a variety of business sectors, and (dental) medicine is no exception []. Continuous progress in information technology (IT) has made it possible to overcome the limitations and hurdles that existed in clinical and technological workflows just a few years ago []. In addition, social and cultural behaviors of civilized society in industrial countries have changed and fostered the trend of digitalization: urbanism, centralization, and mobility, permanent accessibility via smartphones and tablets combined with the internet of things (IoT), as well as convenience-driven markets striving for efficiency [].
The implementation of digital tools and applications reveals novel options facing today’s chief problems in healthcare, such as a demographic development of an aging population with an increased prevalence of chronic diseases and increased treatment costs over an individual’s lifespan []. In dental medicine, several digital workflows for production processing have already been integrated into treatment protocols, especially in the rapidly growing branch of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and rapid prototyping (RP) [].
New possibilities have opened up for automated processing in radiological imaging using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). Moreover, augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) is the technological basis for the superimposition of diverse imaging files creating virtual dental patients and non-invasive simulations comparing different outcomes prior to any clinical intervention. Increased IT-power has fostered these promising technologies, whose possible uses can only be assessed in the future []. Not all digital options are currently exhausted, and their (valuable) advantages are not completely understood. Basic science, clinical trials, and subsequently derived knowledge for innovative therapy protocols need to be re-directed towards patient-centered outcomes, enabling the linkage of oral and general health instead of merely industry-oriented investigations [].
To sum up, unseen opportunities will arise due to digital transformation in oral healthcare and dental research. Therefore, this opinion letter highlights the estimated top five healthcare trends and innovations of the dawning digital era that might influence the direction of dental research and their stakeholders in the near future.

3. Conclusions

The future direction of dental research should foster the linkage of oral and general health in order to focus on personalized medicine considering patient-centered outcomes. In this context, dental research must have an impact as a deliverable to society, not just research to churn out scientific publications but to truly change protocols applied in the clinic. Moreover, here, digitization with AI/ML and AR/VR represents the most promising tools for innovative research today. Furthermore, research in a digital era will also be more and more assessed in terms of “impact” as a deliverable good. Impact assessment is still very much debated by scientists, healthcare policy-makers, and politicians. Additionally, general public health societies are increasingly dependent on solid data sets, gaining knowledge to enable innovations and result in recommendations, guidelines, and healthcare policies of utmost importance. These are supposed to generate economic and social benefits on every and each level from an individual to a population. Scientists in dental medicine have also to be aware that funding might be increasingly dependent on the possibility to demonstrate an impact on a large scale. Thus, the use of impact assessments in the future will most likely serve the following two tasks: (1) demonstrating the value of research, and (2) increasing the value of research through a more effective way of financing research in order to have a societal impact [,].
For digital dentistry, this requires managing expectations pragmatically and ensuring transparency for all stakeholders: patients, healthcare providers, university and other research institutions, the medtech industry, insurance, public media, and state policy. It should not be claimed or implied that digital smart data technologies will replace humans who possess dental expertise and the capacity for patient empathy. Therefore, the dental team controlling the power of the digital toolbox is the key and will continue to play a central role in the patient’s journey to receive the best possible individual treatment, and to provide emotional support. The collection, storage, and analysis of digitized biomedical patient data pose several challenges. In addition to technical aspects for the handling of huge amounts of data, considering internationally defined standards, an ethical and meaningful policy must ensure the protection of patient data for safety optimal impact.
Nowadays, the mixed term “augmented intelligence” is perhaps somewhat prematurely introduced in social media. However, the benefits of digital applications will complement human qualities and abilities in order to achieve improved and cost-efficient healthcare for patients. Augmented intelligence based on big data will help to reduce the incidence of misdiagnosis and offers more useful insights—quickly, accurately, and easily. This is all achievable without losing the human touch, improving the quality of life.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.J.; Methodology, T.J. and N.U.Z.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, T.J. and N.U.Z.; Writing—Review and Editing, M.M.B., R.E.J., M.F., and T.W.; Supervision, T.J.; Project Administration, T.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gopal, G.; Suter-Crazzolara, C.; Toldo, L. Digital transformation in healthcare—Architectures of present and future information technologies. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2019, 57, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Weber, G.M.; Mandl, K.D.; Kohane, I.S. Finding the missing link for big biomedical data. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2014, 311, 2479–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Joda, T.; Waltimo, T.; Pauli-Magnus, C.; Probst-Hensch, N.; Zitzmann, N.U. Population-based linkage of big data in dental research. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Glick, M. Taking a byte out of big data. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2015, 146, 793–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Miyazaki, T.; Hotta, Y. CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Aust. Dent. J. 2011, 56 (Suppl. 1), 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jones, K.H.; Laurie, G.; Stevens, L.; Dobbs, C.; Ford, D.V.; Lea, N. The other side of the coin: Harm due to the non-use of health-related data. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2017, 97, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Joda, T.; Waltimo, T.; Probst-Hensch, N.; Pauli-Magnus, C.; Zitzmann, N.U. Health data in dentistry: An attempt to master the digital challenge. Public Health Genom. 2019, 22, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Joda, T.; Ferrari, M.; Gallucci, G.O.; Wittenben, J.-G.; Bragger, U. Digital technology in fixed implant prosthodontics. Periodontology 2000 2017, 73, 178–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dawood, A.; Marti Marti, B.; Sauret-Jackson, V.; Darwood, A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br. Dent. J. 2015, 219, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lech, G.; Nordström, E. Dimensional Stability of 3D Printed Dental Models. Master’s Thesis, Malmö University Electronic Publishing, Malmö, Sweden, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  11. Galantea, R.; Figueiredo-Pinaa, C.G.; Serro, A.P. Additive manufacturing of ceramics for dental applications: A review. Dent. Mater. 2019, 35, 825–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zocca, A.; Colombo, P.; Gomes, C.M.; Gunster, J. Additive manufacturing of ceramics: Issues, potentialities, and opportunities. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 98, 1983–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bose, S.; Ke, D.; Sahasrabudhe, H.; Bandyopadhyay, A. Additive manufacturing of biomaterials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 93, 45–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sutherland, J.; Belec, J.; Sheikh, A.; Chepelev, L.; Althobaity, W.; Chow, B.J.W.; Mitsouras, D.; Christensen, A.; Rybicki, F.J.; La Russa, D.J. Applying modern virtual and augmented reality technologies to medical images and models. J. Digit. Imaging 2019, 32, 38–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pensieri, C.; Pennacchini, M. Overview: Virtual reality in medicine. J. Virtual Worlds Res. 2014, 7, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kwon, H.B.; Park, Y.S.; Han, J.S. Augmented reality in dentistry: A current perspective. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2018, 76, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Joda, T.; Gallucci, G.O.; Wismeijer, D.; Zitzmann, N.U. Augmented and virtual reality in dental medicine: A systematic review. Comput. Biol. Med. 2019, 108, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Farronato, M.; Maspero, C.; Lanteri, V.; Fama, A.; Ferrati, F.; Pettenuzzo, A.; Farronato, D. Current state of the art in the use of augmented reality in dentistry: A systematic review of the literature. BMC Oral Health 2019, 19, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Joda, T.; Gallucci, G.O. The virtual patient in dental medicine. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2015, 26, 725–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, S.H. Research and development of haptic simulator for dental education using virtual reality and user motion. Int. J. Adv. Smart Conv. 2018, 7, 114–120. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ayoub, A.; Pulijala, Y. The application of virtual reality and augmented reality in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. BMC Oral Health 2019, 19, 238. [Google Scholar]
  22. Durham, M.; Engel, B.; Ferrill, T.; Halford, J.; Singh, T.P.; Gladwell, M. Digitally augmented learning in implant dentistry. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 31, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Currie, G. Intelligent imaging: Anatomy of machine learning and deep learning. J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 2019, 47, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Park, W.J.; Park, J.B. History and application of artificial neural networks in dentistry. Eur. J. Dent. 2018, 12, 594–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, Y.W.; Stanley, K.; Att, W. Artificial intelligence in dentistry: Current applications and future perspectives. Quintessence Int. 2020, 51, 248–257. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Kulkarni, S.; Seneviratne, N.; Baig, M.S.; Khan, A.H.A. Artificial intelligence in medicine: Where are we now? Acad. Radiol. 2020, 27, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tuzoff, D.V.; Tuzova, L.N.; Bornstein, M.M.; Krasnov, A.S.; Kharchenko, M.A.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Sveshnikov, M.M.; Bednenko, G.B. Tooth detection and numbering in panoramic radiographs using convolutional neural networks. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2019, 48, 20180051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hung, K.; Montalvao, C.; Tanaka, R.; Kawai, T.; Bornstein, M.M. The use and performance of artificial intelligence applications in dental and maxillofacial radiology: A systematic review. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2020, 49, 20190107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Leite, A.F.; Vasconcelos, K.F.; Willems, H.; Jacobs, R. Radiomics and machine learning in oral healthcare. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2020, e1900040, [Epub ahead of print]. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Goldhahn, J.; Rampton-Branco-Weiss, V.; Spinas, G.A. Could artificial intelligence make doctors obsolete? BMJ 2018, 363, k4563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Tokede, O.; White, J.; Stark, P.C.; Vaderhobli, R.; Walji, M.F.; Ramoni, R.; Schoonheim-Klein, M.; Kimmes, N.; Tavares, A.; Kalenderian, E. Assessing use of a standardized dental diagnostic terminology in an electronic health record. J. Dent. Educ. 2013, 77, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Harron, K.L.; Doidge, J.C.; Knight, H.E.; Gilbert, R.E.; Goldstein, H.; Cromwell, D.A.; van der Meulen, J.H. A guide to evaluating linkage quality for the analysis of linked data. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 46, 1699–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Manolopoulos, V.G.; Dechairo, B.; Huriez, A.; Kühn, A.; Llerena, A.; van Schaik, R.H.; Yeo, K.T.; Ragia, G.; Siest, G. Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine in clinical practice. Pharmacogenomics 2011, 12, 597–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Aldridge, R.W.; Shaji, K.; Hayward, A.C.; Abubakar, I. Accuracy of probabilistic linkage using the enhanced matching system for public health and epidemiological studies. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jorm, L. Routinely collected data as a strategic resource for research: Priorities for methods and workforce. Public Health Res. Pract. 2015, 25, e2541540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Garcia, I.; Kuska, R.; Somerman, M.J. Expanding the foundation for personalized medicine: Implications and challenges for dentistry. J. Dent. Res. 2013, 92, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Marrazzo, P.; Paduano, F.; Palmieri, F.; Marrelli, M.; Tatullo, M. Highly efficient in vitro reparative behavior of dental pulp stem cells cultured with standardized platelet lysate. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 2016, 7230987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Emmert-Streib, F. Personalized medicine: Has it started yet? A reconstruction of the early history. Front. Genet. 2013, 3, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Di Sanzo, M.; Borro, M.; La Russa, R.; Cipolloni, L.; Santurro, A.; Scopetti, M.; Simmaco, M.; Frati, P. Clinical applications of personalized medicine: A new paradigm and challenge. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2017, 18, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, S.; Parsons, M.; Stone-McLean, J.; Rogers, P.; Boyd, S.; Hoover, K.; Meruvis-Pastor, O.; Gong, M.; Smith, A. Augmented reality as a telemedicine platform for remote procedural training. Sensors 2017, 17, 2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jampani, N.D.; Nutalapati, R.; Dontula, B.S.; Boyapati, R. Applications of teledentistry: A literature review and update. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2011, 1, 37–44. [Google Scholar]
  42. Estai, M.; Kruger, E.; Tennant, M.; Bunt, S.; Kanagasingam, Y. Challenges in the uptake of telemedicine in dentistry. Rural. Remote. Health 2016, 16, 3915. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Lienert, N.; Zitzmann, N.U.; Filippi, A.; Weiger, R.; Krastl, G. Teledental consultations related to trauma in a Swiss telemedical center: A retrospective survey. Dent. Traumatol. 2010, 26, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Daniel, S.J.; Kumar, S. Teledentistry: A key component in access to care. J. Evid. Based Dent. Pract. 2014, 14, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Irving, M.; Stewart, R.; Spallek, H.; Blinkhom, A. Using teledentistry in clinical practice as an enabler to improve access to clinical care: A qualitative systematic review. J. Telemed. Telecare 2018, 24, 129–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, G.; Xiang, W.; Pickering, M. A cross-platform solution for light field based 3D telemedicine. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2016, 125, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Estai, M.; Bunt, S.; Kanagasingam, Y.; Tennant, M. Cost savings from a teledentistry model for school dental screening: An Australian health system perspective. Aust. Health Rev. 2018, 42, 482–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Greenhalgh, T.; Raftery, J.; Hanney, S.; Glover, M. Research impact: A narrative review. BMC Med. 2016, 14, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Newson, R.; King, L.; Rychetnik, L.; Milat, A.; Bauman, A. Looking both ways: A review of methods for assessing research impacts on policy and the policy utilisation of research. Health Res. Policy Syst. 2018, 16, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.