Next Article in Journal
Passive Smoking Exposure and Perceived Health Status in Children Seeking Pediatric Care Services at a Vietnamese Tertiary Hospital
Previous Article in Journal
Socio-Psychological Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Community Health and Well-Being
Previous Article in Special Issue
HGBEnviroScreen: Enabling Community Action through Data Integration in the Houston–Galveston–Brazoria Region
Open AccessArticle

Aligning Community-Engaged Research to Context

1
UC Davis Department of Human Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
2
Department of Human and Organizational Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
3
Harvard Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
4
UC Davis Center for Health and the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
5
School of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
6
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(4), 1187; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041187
Received: 18 December 2019 / Revised: 28 January 2020 / Accepted: 10 February 2020 / Published: 13 February 2020
Community-engaged research is understood as existing on a continuum from less to more community engagement, defined by participation and decision-making authority. It has been widely assumed that more is better than less engagement. However, we argue that what makes for good community engagement is not simply the extent but the fit or alignment between the intended approach and the various contexts shaping the research projects. This article draws on case studies from three Community Engagement Cores (CECs) of NIEHS-funded Environmental Health Science Core Centers (Harvard University, UC Davis and University of Arizona,) to illustrate the ways in which community engagement approaches have been fit to different contexts and the successes and challenges experienced in each case. We analyze the processes through which the CECs work with researchers and community leaders to develop place-based community engagement approaches and find that different strategies are called for to fit distinct contexts. We find that alignment of the scale and scope of the environmental health issue and related research project, the capacities and resources of the researchers and community leaders, and the influences of the sociopolitical environment are critical for understanding and designing effective and equitable engagement approaches. These cases demonstrate that the types and degrees of alignment in community-engaged research projects are dynamic and evolve over time. Based on this analysis, we recommend that CBPR scholars and practitioners select a range of project planning and management techniques for designing and implementing their collaborative research approaches and both expect and allow for the dynamic and changing nature of alignment. View Full-Text
Keywords: environmental health science; environmental justice; community based participatory research; community–university partnerships environmental health science; environmental justice; community based participatory research; community–university partnerships
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

London, J.K.; Haapanen, K.A.; Backus, A.; Mack, S.M.; Lindsey, M.; Andrade, K. Aligning Community-Engaged Research to Context. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1187.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop