Next Article in Journal
Effects of Motivational Climate on Fear of Failure and Anxiety in Teen Handball Players
Next Article in Special Issue
Platinum Mine Workers’ Exposure to Dust Particles Emitted at Mine Waste Rock Crusher Plants in Limpopo, South Africa
Previous Article in Journal
Relations among Poly-Bullying Victimization, Subjective Well-Being and Resilience in a Sample of Late Adolescents
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Review of Respiratory Anatomical Development, Air Flow Characterization and Particle Deposition
Open AccessArticle
Peer-Review Record

Asbestos-Related Lung Cancer: A Hospital-Based Case-Control Study in Indonesia

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(2), 591; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020591
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(2), 591; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020591
Received: 16 December 2019 / Revised: 7 January 2020 / Accepted: 13 January 2020 / Published: 16 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Occupational Respiratory Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Asbestos-Related Lung Cancer: A Hospital-Based Case Control Study in Indonesia

 

In total, 710 subjects, including 336 lung cancers and 360 controls, were interviewed for their work and residential environment. Asbestos exposure was assessed based on Job-Exposure Matrix developed for Korean industry, as the exposure measurements were not available in Indonesia. After controlling covariates, the results show elevated odd ratio of lung cancer from asbestos exposure.

 

This study adds important evidence of asbestos hazardous effects in developing countries, especially under the circumstances of controversy of chrysotile from Russia in Asian countries. However, the study needs to address the following comments before the results can be interpreted appropriately.

 

The study does not mention about the lung cancer diagnosis, except a short sentence of two deleted cases of not histologically confirmed. Authors need to give details of the final diagnosis of lung cancer groups, including the histologic diagnosis. If possible, authors need to explain about the national figures of lung cancer diagnosis, so that readers can understand how the studied group can represent the whole lung cancer patient population in Indonesia, in terms of the size, histologic types, etc. Authors also need to divide the case group into histologic categories, when the association with asbestos exposure was examined. Authors need to give details of the underlying diagnosis of the control group. How the controls were selected is very crucial for the validity of the study, and the process and criteria for inclusion or exclusion should be specified more clearly, and the results should be shown according to the procedures and criteria. The industry structure of Indonesia and its classification should be compared to those of Korea, in order to assess the appropriateness of using the exposure classification of different industries.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This study presented a research on correlation between occupational asbestos exposure and risk of lung cancer development.

The Introduction is comprehensive and provides a solid background for a reader.

The Methods section is presented properly and is detailed enough for the research to be repeated.

In the Results section authors have addressed all concerns very well. I really like the fact that the author estimated not only occupational asbestos exposure but its co-existing with other risk factors for lung cancer development, and also non-occupational exposure. The tables and figures are comprehensive and comfortable to read.

The Discussion section is well-structured. The authors take their results critically.

The only grammatical mistake I found is placed on pg. 7 line 196: space is not required before closing parenthesis.

The paper is well-written and easy to read, the authors have addressed all concerns.

Author Response

 

Thank you very much for your review and encouraging comments, which we appreciate them.

We have made a correction regarding your comments.

Back to TopTop