Next Article in Journal
Preliminary Analysis of the Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity of an Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Screening Tool for Use with Adults in Malaysia
Next Article in Special Issue
The SED-GIH: A Single-Item Question for Assessment of Stationary Behavior—A Study of Concurrent and Convergent Validity
Previous Article in Journal
Psychopathic Disorder Subtypes Based on Temperament and Character Differences
Previous Article in Special Issue
Relationships between Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Cognitive Functions in Office Workers
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 16
Issue 23
10.3390/ijerph16234762
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share announcement thumb_up
...
textsms
...
Commentary

Controversies in the Science of Sedentary Behaviour and Health: Insights, Perspectives and Future Directions from the 2018 Queensland Sedentary Behaviour Think Tank

by
Stuart J.H. Biddle
1,*,
Jason A. Bennie
1,
Katrien De Cocker
1,
David Dunstan
2,
Paul A. Gardiner
3,
Genevieve N. Healy
3,
Brigid Lynch
4,
Neville Owen
2,
Charlotte Brakenridge
5,
Wendy Brown
6,
Matthew Buman
7,
Bronwyn Clark
3,
Ing-Mari Dohrn
8,
Mitch Duncan
9,
Nicholas Gilson
6,
Tracy Kolbe-Alexander
1,
Toby Pavey
10,
Natasha Reid
3,
Corneel Vandelanotte
11,
Ineke Vergeer
1 and
Grace E. Vincent
12
1
Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia
2
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
3
School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
4
Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
5
The University of Queensland, RECOVER Injury Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
6
School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
7
College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
8
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, 11330 Stockholm, Sweden
9
Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
10
Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia
11
School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, Australia
12
School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Wayville, SA 5034, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(23), 4762; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234762
Received: 6 November 2019 / Revised: 20 November 2019 / Accepted: 20 November 2019 / Published: 27 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sedentary Behaviour and Health)
View Full-Text Download PDF
Browse Figures
Review Reports

Abstract

The development in research concerning sedentary behaviour has been rapid over the past two decades. This has led to the development of evidence and views that have become more advanced, diverse and, possibly, contentious. These include the effects of standing, the breaking up of prolonged sitting and the role of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in the association between sedentary behaviour and health outcomes. The present aim is to report the views of experts (n = 21) brought together (one-day face-to-face meeting in 2018) to consider these issues and provide conclusions and recommendations for future work. Each topic was reviewed and presented by one expert followed by full group discussion, which was recorded, transcribed and analysed. The experts concluded that (a). standing may bring benefits that accrue from postural shifts. Prolonged (mainly static) standing and prolonged sitting are both bad for health; (b). ‘the best posture is the next posture’. Regularly breaking up of sitting with postural shifts and movement is vital; (c). health effects of prolonged sitting are evident even after controlling for MVPA, but high levels of MVPA can attenuate the deleterious effects of prolonged sitting depending on the health outcome of interest. Expert discussion addressed measurement, messaging and future directions.
View Full-Text
Keywords: breaks; debate; health; mediation; moderation; physical activity; posture; sedentary; standing breaks; debate; health; mediation; moderation; physical activity; posture; sedentary; standing
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
SciFeed

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Biddle, S.J.H.; Bennie, J.A.; De Cocker, K.; Dunstan, D.; Gardiner, P.A.; Healy, G.N.; Lynch, B.; Owen, N.; Brakenridge, C.; Brown, W.; Buman, M.; Clark, B.; Dohrn, I.-M.; Duncan, M.; Gilson, N.; Kolbe-Alexander, T.; Pavey, T.; Reid, N.; Vandelanotte, C.; Vergeer, I.; Vincent, G.E. Controversies in the Science of Sedentary Behaviour and Health: Insights, Perspectives and Future Directions from the 2018 Queensland Sedentary Behaviour Think Tank. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4762. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234762

AMA Style

Biddle SJH, Bennie JA, De Cocker K, Dunstan D, Gardiner PA, Healy GN, Lynch B, Owen N, Brakenridge C, Brown W, Buman M, Clark B, Dohrn I-M, Duncan M, Gilson N, Kolbe-Alexander T, Pavey T, Reid N, Vandelanotte C, Vergeer I, Vincent GE. Controversies in the Science of Sedentary Behaviour and Health: Insights, Perspectives and Future Directions from the 2018 Queensland Sedentary Behaviour Think Tank. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(23):4762. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234762

Chicago/Turabian Style

Biddle, Stuart J.H.; Bennie, Jason A.; De Cocker, Katrien; Dunstan, David; Gardiner, Paul A.; Healy, Genevieve N.; Lynch, Brigid; Owen, Neville; Brakenridge, Charlotte; Brown, Wendy; Buman, Matthew; Clark, Bronwyn; Dohrn, Ing-Mari; Duncan, Mitch; Gilson, Nicholas; Kolbe-Alexander, Tracy; Pavey, Toby; Reid, Natasha; Vandelanotte, Corneel; Vergeer, Ineke; Vincent, Grace E. 2019. "Controversies in the Science of Sedentary Behaviour and Health: Insights, Perspectives and Future Directions from the 2018 Queensland Sedentary Behaviour Think Tank" Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, no. 23: 4762. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234762

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop