Next Article in Journal
Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure in Relation to Family Characteristics, Stressors and Chemical Co-Exposures in California Girls
Next Article in Special Issue
Intrapreneurial Self-Capital Mediates the Connectedness to Nature Effect on Well-Being at Work
Previous Article in Journal
Do Compactness and Poly-Centricity Mitigate PM10 Emissions? Evidence from Yangtze River Delta Area
Previous Article in Special Issue
Authentic Leadership and Employees’ Innovative Behaviour: A Multilevel Investigation in Three Countries
Open AccessArticle

Smartphone Application in Postgraduate Clinical Psychology Training: Trainees’ Perspectives

1
Department of Psychology, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Singapore 387380, Singapore
2
College of Healthcare Sciences, Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Queensland 4811, Australia
3
Family Medicine and Primary Care, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308232, Singapore
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(21), 4206; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214206
Received: 13 September 2019 / Revised: 25 October 2019 / Accepted: 28 October 2019 / Published: 30 October 2019
M-learning refers to the learning that takes advantage of mobile technologies. Although research shows enhanced educational outcomes from m-learning in some Asian countries, the generalizability to postgraduate clinical psychology training in Singapore remains unclear. Current professional standards in clinical psychology training emphasize the importance of attainment of clinical competencies in trainees. Although learning theories indicated potential for m-learning to be incorporated into the local clinical psychology curriculum, trainees’ perspectives have not been adequately explored on m-learning. The study aimed to address this gap by exploring the use of m-learning via a novel smartphone application in clinical psychology training using mixed-methods design. Eight clinical psychology trainees between the ages of 26 to 43 years old (mean age of 31.75, SD = 5.49) enrolled in a relevant coursework subject were recruited. Participants were randomly allocated to the experimental and control groups. The experimental group accessed the novel application weekly, from week 1 to week 6, and participants in the control group accessed the application after week 6. Participants from both groups completed a brief demographic questionnaire, and the following scales New General Self-Efficacy Scale adapted for Education (NGSES-E) and self-reported scale of learning outcomes (SLO). The qualitative study explored how participants perceived and experienced the novel application. Participants from the experimental group were invited to provide open-ended responses about the novel application. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results from the qualitative analysis yielded four themes of: Convenience, preferred learning style, building confidence, and putting theory into practice. Findings from the qualitative study were consistent with previous studies about advantages of m-learning: That the e-platform was convenient, the learning style was engaging, which helped to build confidence, and facilitate practical learning of skills. The qualitative results were helpful in understanding the users’ perspectives and experience of the novel application, indicating that future research in this innovative area is necessary. However, the quantitative outcomes were not significant, limitations would be discussed, and recommendations made for future research. View Full-Text
Keywords: clinical psychology education; self-efficacy; smartphone application; mixed methods; m-learning clinical psychology education; self-efficacy; smartphone application; mixed methods; m-learning
MDPI and ACS Style

Choo, C.C.; Devakaran, B.; Chew, P.K.H.; Zhang, M.W.B. Smartphone Application in Postgraduate Clinical Psychology Training: Trainees’ Perspectives. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4206.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop