Next Article in Journal
Blending Insights from Implementation Science and the Social Sciences to Mitigate Inequities in Screening for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes
Previous Article in Journal
Pricing Strategy of Construction and Demolition Waste Considering Retailer Fairness Concerns under a Governmental Regulation Environment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 16
Issue 20
10.3390/ijerph16203898
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Implementation of the European School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme in Spain (2009–2017)

by
Panmela Soares
1,2,
Iris Comino
1,*,
María Asunción Martínez-Milán
1,
M. Carmen Davó-Blanes
1,2,
Cesare Altavilla
1 and
Pablo Caballero
1
1
Department of Community Nursing, Preventive Medicine and Public Health and History of Science, University of Alicante, 99-03080 Alicante, Spain
2
Public Health Research Group, University of Alicante, 99-03080 Alicante, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(20), 3898; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203898
Submission received: 28 August 2019 / Revised: 8 October 2019 / Accepted: 10 October 2019 / Published: 15 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Children's Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

The School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme (SFVS) implemented by the European Union in 2009/2010 aims to improve the diet of students and to support agricultural markets and environmental sustainability. The objective of this study was to identify the characteristics of the School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme implementation from 2009 to 2017 in Spain and its autonomous communities. A descriptive, longitudinal, observational, and retrospective study was carried out on the basis of document analysis of SFVS reports. We studied the average budget for Spain and its autonomous communities (AC), the number of students enrolled, the cost of the SFVS by student and by day, the duration of the SFVS, the quantity of fruits and vegetables (FV) per student and day (g), the variety of FV, the recommendation to include local, seasonal, and organic foods, and the educational activities (EA). The results were studied by the AC which are territorial entities of Spain. The budget almost doubled during the study, thanks mainly to EU funds. However, the number of students increased only from 18% in 2009 to 20% in 2016. The quantity of FV increased from 2579 to 4000 tons, and the duration of the SFVS increased from 9.8 to 19.6 days. In the AC, there were variations in EA, in the number of enrolled students (7.4% to 45.6%), in the cost per student (from €2.3 to €28), and in the duration in days (5.6 to 70 days). The recommendation to include local, seasonal, and organic foods was implemented in five of the eight years studied. The development and scope of the SFVS in Spain are still insufficient to generate an equitable healthy dietary pattern in the school population. However, the SFVS has generated an economic market for agricultural production due to the amount of FV distributed in each academic course.

1. Introduction

The low intake of fruits and vegetables (FV) is an important risk factor for the development of non-transmissible diseases [1,2]. Promoting their consumption from infancy is a priority for public health thanks to their ability to lower the burden of disease [3].
From this perspective, the European Commission (EC) recognizes the importance of developing a plan to promote the consumption of fruit and vegetables in schools, supported by the EU [4] (Commission of the European Communities, 2007), and in the 2009–2010 academic course, the School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme (SFVS) was implemented. The SFVS aims to act on health, diet, agricultural markets, social equality, and regional cohesion [5,6].
Member states participating in the SFVS may choose the appropriate geographical and administrative level at which they wish to apply the SFVS. The appropriate administrative level at which to apply the SFVS in Spain is the autonomous community level, mainly for reasons related to the delegation of responsibilities within the Spanish State. The competencies in agricultural, health, and education matters are transferred to the autonomous communities (AC) which are administrative-territorial entities. For these reasons, the SFVS is carried out at the regional level, although the competent national authority establishes a common framework. Therefore, AC establish, in their respective regional strategies, how and when to distribute the produce. The EC considers the distribution of produce at mealtimes (school canteen) not to be appropriate for three fundamental reasons: control difficulties, inaccessibility of some students to the school canteen, and the possibility of replacing the item with other menu options [5,6].
The SFVS receives funding from the European Commission, central government, regional governments (autonomous communities) and, in some cases, private companies [7]. The budget allocated to the SFVS is granted for the distribution of FV to the group target in the affiliated schools, for a series of educational activities (EA) designed to stimulate healthy eating habits in the child population in the short and long term [5,7,8] and for logistics and distribution costs, equipment, communication, monitoring, and evaluation of the SFVS.
For SFVS implementation, authorization requests are solicited annually in accordance with the conditions established by the competent authority of the autonomous community. The State can select schools that meet specific conditions [5].
Following the international recommendations for promoting a healthy diet [2,9], the SFVS is an integral and coordinated strategy among different sectors, which promotes agricultural production of FV while stimulating consumption in schools [6]. This set up gives it the potential to influence different determinants of health such as education, environment, agriculture, and employment [10]. The SFVS aims to improve the eating habits and also to support the distribution of local and seasonal products using short commercial chains with active participation of agricultural producers [4]. Using this distribution formula for foods has been identified as a strategy that contributes to promoting a more sustainable and healthy food system [11,12,13].
Currently, in Spain, the SFVS is being carried out in different AC in a coordinated way between the Ministry of Agriculture, Fishing, and Food (MAPA), the Ministry of Health, Social Services, and Equality, and the Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sports [8]. However, although the SFVS has been implemented since 2009, there is little information on how it has been carried out in the different autonomous communities and on whether there are differences between them related to social equality and regional cohesion. Given the potential of the SFVS to support more sustainable and healthy food systems, its implementation and development in Spain continue to be important. The objective of this study is to identify the characteristics of the School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme implementation from 2009 to 2017 in Spain and its autonomous communities.

2. Materials and Methods

We carried out a descriptive, longitudinal, observational, and retrospective study nationally based on secondary sources. Sources included all the annual SFVS plans in Spain from 2009/2010 to 2016/2017, available on the webpage of MAPA [7,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
The following variables were extracted from the reports consulted and were calculated by academic course (school time period between September and June) and AC: European and state budget (€), number of students enrolled (n), duration of the SFVS (days), quantity of FV included (t), varieties of FV (n), recommendation of local foods (yes, no), seasonal foods (yes, no) and organic foods (yes, no), and education activities.
For each AC and academic course, we calculated the average budget financed by the EU and by state (€, %), the number of students enrolled in the SFVS (n,%), the cost of the SFVS per student and per day (€), the duration of the SFVS (days), the quantity per student (kg), the quantity per student and day (g), and the variety of FV (n). Also, we studied the correlation between cost per student and recommendation of local, seasonal, and organic foods. In order to calculate the average number of students enrolled, the average cost per student, and the average quantity of FV per student, the values were weighted by the number of students enrolled in the SFVS in each studied autonomous community. To calculate the percentage of students covered by the SFVS, we used the target group of students enrolled in each AC between 3 and 18 years of age, as indicated in the regulations [5,21,22]. To calculate the cost per student, we divided the budget of each autonomous community among the students that adhered to the SFVS in that autonomous community. The grams per student in terms of the duration of the SFVS is the amount of FV offered per day and student. The data are presented for the whole of Spain by academic course and by AC. In the case of AC, the number of times that local, seasonal, and organic foods were included is also shown.
Also, with the objective of exploring the varieties of FV that were most frequent in the SFVS, we accounted for the number of times that each fruit or vegetable was included in the SFVS in each AC.
To know the educational strategies used by each AC in the SFVS, the EA were grouped into six categories: (1) Playful educational activities (campaigns, contests, workshops, games, theatrical performances and exhibitions on food habits, merchandising, FV calendars, gymkhanas, comics and animations about FV consumption, miniseries); (2) Didactic material (posters, brochures, cards, posters, teaching units, pedagogical guides, web resources); (3) Visits to the field and/or to farms, fruit and vegetable producers, and marketers of FV; (4) Training sessions (lectures, talks, colloquia for teachers, students, and parents); (5) Cooking workshops (cooking competitions, preparation of dishes with FV, tasting of products, sensory tastings, and preparation of recipes with fruit); (6) School gardens that included agricultural workshops and gardening sessions. The number of times each of them was present in the SFVS was counted by the autonomous community and academic course, and the first year of incorporation was identified.

3. Results

Table 1 describes the SFVS in Spain from 2009 to 2017. During the eight years studied, the SFVS was implemented in 14/15 autonomous communities of the 17 that make up Spain. During the first year, SFVS coverage reached 18.6% of the students. Although this figure fell in 2013 (15.6%), it increased again in the following years, reaching 20.5% in the 2015/16 academic year. The cost per student went from €7.8 in 2009/2010 to almost €10 in the last year and had a notable reduction in the 2012–2014 period. The duration of the SFVS, that is, the days when the SFVS was implemented grew gradually, with an average of 9.8 days in 2009/2010 rising to 19.6 days in the 2016/2017 academic year. The average cost per student and day was reduced across the entire period, from €1.80 in 2009/2010 to €0.51 in 2016/2017. The offering of FV also increased, reaching 4000 tons (2.8 kilos per student) in 2016/2017. The variety of fruits distributed remained constant, approximately 21 kinds of fruits, whereas the variety of vegetables increased from 5 to 10 (between 2009/2010 and 2016/2017).
Figure 1 shows the annual distribution of the country and the EU budget for the SFVS in Spain. In 2009, financing came mainly from country funding. In the two following years, there was an increase in the country and European budgets. In the 2012–2014 period, both budget sources decreased, with the reduction from the country fund being more pronounced. In the last period of 2014–2017, the allocation of country funding continued to fall; however, the global budget increased due to the funds allocated by the EU.
Table 2 shows the characteristics of the SFVS in the autonomous communities during the 2009–2017 period. Except for Madrid, which did not join the SFVS, the other autonomous communities participated in the program for a number of editions between three (Cantabria and País Vasco) and eight during the period studied. Andalucía and Cataluña had a higher average budget than the rest of the autonomous communities. However, the SFVS coverage for students was higher in Cantabria (64%) and Castilla y León (45.6%). The average cost per student was higher in Navarra (€28.4) and La Rioja (€19.3). Both communities also had a longer average duration of the SFVS (69.9 and 70.8 days, respectively). Galicia, Cantabria, and Navarra were the autonomous communities with the lowest average cost of SFVS per student per day, (€0.20, €0.30, and €0.50, respectively). Fruit and vegetable rations provided per day and student varied from 393 g (Andalucía) to 70 g Murcia. The autonomous communities that declared the highest amounts of fruits and vegetables per student per year were Navarra (8.1 kg) and Islas Canarias (5.1 kg). Regarding the variety of fruits, there was great variability among the autonomous communities: from 13.4 varieties in Cataluña to 1.9 in Navarra. Vegetables were not included in four of the AC (Aragón, Asturias, Galicia, and País Vasco). Except for Aragon and Navarra, the rest of the autonomous communities incorporated local foods in at least two editions of the SFVS from the 2012/2013 academic year. Seasonal foods were incorporated in all of the AC in some edition. However, 7 of the 16 AC did not include organic foods in any edition of the SFVS. There were no significant differences between the cost per student and the recommendation of local, seasonal, and organic foods.
Figure 2 shows the frequency and kinds of fruits and vegetables included in the SFVS in the whole of Spain. The frequency and variety of fruits were more predominant than those of vegetables. The most frequent fruits were apples and pears (88 and 85 times, respectively), and the most frequent vegetables were tomatoes and carrots (41 and 34, respectively).
Finally, Table 3 shows the EA included in the strategies of the different autonomous communities. Andalusia and Murcia stood out for their greater variety of EA in the different editions of the SFVS, and Cantabria for not having any. Recreational-educational activities, elaboration of didactic materials, and visits were the most frequent activities in AC during the 2009–2017 period. Andalusia was a pioneer in the implementation of educational activities to accompany the SFVS compared to the rest of the autonomous communities. By 2009, this community had declared recreational-educational activities, the elaboration of didactic materials, and training days and in later editions, it incorporated cooking workshops and school gardens. Visits to agricultural centers or vegetable gardens as well as fruit and vegetable producers and marketers were reported for the first time in Catalonia and Murcia in 2010/2011.

4. Discussion

The purpose of this study was to identify the characteristics of the School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme implementation from 2009 to 2017 in Spain and its autonomous communities. The majority of the AC participated in the different editions of the SFVS organizing the distribution of FV along with various educational activities. Although the SFVS had increasing coverage in terms of the students, its scope was limited. In addition, the implementation of the SFVS in each of the AC was very heterogeneous. The SFVS received more and more financial support from the European Union for its implementation, while funding at the state level was progressively reduced. Even so, the quantities of fruits and vegetables provided in the SFVS increased. This, together with the incorporation of local, seasonal, and organic foods in some autonomous regions is in accordance with the strategies to promote a healthy diet and a more sustainable food system.
The participation of a large proportion of the autonomous communities in the different editions of the SFVS shows their interest in incorporating the international recommendations in their educational offerings to promote the consumption of fruits and vegetables among the student population. Specifically, childhood is the ideal time to establish healthy eating behaviors, since these will probably persist in adult life [23,24,25].
The availability of fruits and vegetables in the school environment seems to encourage consumption among children [26,27,28], which helps to reduce the intake of unhealthy foods [29,30]. However, the amounts of FV provided to the students in the SFVS are too low. Only four ACs offered rations bigger than 144 g as recommended by the Scientific Committee of “5 per day” [31]. This is important, since there are students that only have the opportunity to eat FV in school time.
Furthermore, the distribution of fruits and vegetables alone is not sufficient to establish a healthy eating pattern [28,32,33,34]. Other complementary actions are required to increase information and raise awareness of the benefits of their consumption [33,34,35,36]. Thus, SFVS should be accompanied by educational activities. In line with this demand, our results showed a large number and variety of educational activities.
However, a large number of theory-based training activities (didactic material and training sessions) that are being developed may limit the scope of the educational objectives of the SFVS, given that they emphasize the conceptual objectives of the SFVS more than changing attitudes or procedures. In fact, previous studies show that with recreational–educational activities and cooking workshops, better results are achieved [35,36,37,38]. In addition, the potential benefits of SFVS to improve the dietary pattern of students can be compromised by the high variation observed in the different autonomous regions and the program sustainability [39,40]. As our results show, although SFVS coverage increased throughout the period studied, its scope was limited both by the number of days devoted to its implementation and by the number of students enrolled. These results suggest a possible limitation in the scope of the SFVS’ objectives, that is, to promote changes in the dietary pattern.
Furthermore, the heterogeneous development of the SFVS in the autonomous communities observed in the variables studied suggests unequal access to the program for the students according to their place of residence. This could lead to greater inequality in health, especially in families with low incomes and difficulties in accessing adequate food supplies [26,29,30]. This heterogeneity could be explained by its management by the autonomous communities and the absence of a sufficiently structured common regulatory framework. The predominance of the European Union funding of the SFVS over that received by the state suggests the existence of a disconnect between the actions carried out by both actors. The development and implementation of policies to promote healthy eating in schools require integrated efforts from different sectors [9,11]. Despite the interest shown by the Spanish state in promoting a healthier diet through other initiatives such as the NAOS strategy (Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Prevention of Obesity) [41], the Perseo Program (Guide for an Active Healthy School) [42], and the THAO program (prevention of childhood obesity based on actions in municipalities) [43], these initiatives have been carried out in parallel with the SFVS but in a disjointed way.
The progressive increase in the quantities of fruits and vegetables provided in schools can favor the development of agricultural markets. That is why institutional buying creates a new market for family farmers. Prioritizing the purchase of local, seasonal, and organic foods would contribute to a more sustainable food system [44,45]. In addition, this would be in line with the recommendations of the European Commission to reverse the negative impact of the current food production system on the environment and society [46]. Our results show that including local, seasonal, and organic food into the SFVS does not increase the cost per student. Even so, the incorporation of these recommendations in the SFVS is still just beginning.
When interpreting these results, we must remember that the information used came from the annual reports of the SFVS, prepared by the strategy managers in each AC. This can result in certain limitations due to the use of secondary data; as such, we do not have de control of the collection of these data. Also, we have no information on which schools implemented better the SFVS in each AC. However, the reports present the information in a homogeneous way for the different academic courses studied, which allowed us to explore how the SFVS is implemented in Spain. On the other hand, although this study focuses on a single country (Spain), which makes it difficult to extrapolate and generalize the results, the proposed methodology allowed us the describe some characteristics of the implementation and evolution of the SFVS. However, we do not have information about whether the availability of FV was equal in all schools which adhered to the SFVS. This is the first study to explore the scope of the SFVS. Given that the SFVS is an EU strategy, this study can contribute to decision-making to strengthen or introduce changes in the SFVS.

5. Conclusions

The development and scope of the SFVS in Spain are still insufficient to generate an equitable healthy dietary pattern for the students. The SFVS covers a limited percentage of the target group of students and is carried out heterogeneously in the different autonomous communities. This finding is contradictory to the purpose of the SFVS, that is, to improve the dietary pattern of students regardless of their geographic and socioeconomic status. Also, the continuity of the program depends largely on the funds that come from the EU. However, the SFVS has generated a consumer market for agricultural production. This information is related to the fact that, according to the data presented, thanks to the SFVS, a great amount of FV is being distributed. Before the implementation of the SFVS, these quantities were not acquired by schools. Taking into account the potential of the SFVS to improve children’s food consumption in line with sustainable development objectives, it is important to guarantee its implementation. Increasing the Spanish portion of the budget and promoting synergies among the agents involved could improve the coverage and duration of the SFVS, which would help promote sustainable food systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.S. and I.C.; methodology, P.S. and P.C.; formal analysis, I.C., M.A.M.-M., and P.C.; investigation, I.C. and C.A.; writing—original draft preparation, I.C.; writing—review and editing, P.S., M.C.D.-B., and P.C.; supervision, P.S., M.C.D.-B., and P.C.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aune, D.; Giovannucci, E.; Boffetta, P.; Fadnes, L.T.; Keum, N.; Norat, T.; Greenwood, D.C.; Riboli, E.; Vatten, L.J.; Tonstad, S. Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality—A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 46, 1029–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. WHO. Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases: Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lock, K.; Pomerleau, J.; Causer, L.; Altmann, D.R.; McKee, M. The global burden of disease attributable to low consumption of fruit and vegetables: Implications for the global strategy on diet. Bull. World Health Organ. 2005, 83, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Roux, P. White Paper on a Strategy for Europe on Nutrition, Overweight and Obesity-Related Health Issues; Commission of the European Communities: Brussels, Belgium, 2007; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  5. Commission of the European Communities. Commission Regulation (EC) No 288/2009 of 7 April 2009 Laying Down Provisions for the Application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 Regarding the Granting of Community aid for the Distribution of Fruits and Vegetables; Pub. L. No. 288/2009 (2009). Re; Official Journal of the European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  6. Council of the European Union. Council Regulation (EC) No 13/2009 of 18 December 2008 Amending Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the Financing of the Common Agricultural Policy and Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 Establishing A Common Organization of Agriculture; Official Journal of the European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2009; pp. 9–12. [Google Scholar]
  7. MARM. Plan de Consumo de Fruta y Verdura en las Escuelas 2009–2010; Gobierno de España: Madrid, Spain, 2010; pp. 1–47.
  8. Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca Alimentación y Medio Ambiente. Plan de Consumo de Fruta y Verdura en las Escuelas; Gobierno de España: Madrid, Spain, 2017.
  9. Waxman, A. WHO Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. Food Nutr. Bull. 2004, 25, 292–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the Gap in A Generation: Health Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health: Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hodder, R.K.; Stacey, F.G.; O’Brien, K.M.; Wyse, R.J.; Clinton-McHarg, T.; Tzelepis, F.; James, E.L.; Bartlem, K.M.; Nathan, N.K.; Sutherland, R.; et al. Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged five years and under. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mikkelsen, M.V.; Husby, S.; Skov, L.R.; Perez-cueto, F.J.A. A systematic review of types of healthy eating interventions in preschools. Nutr. J. 2014, 13, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Soares, P.; Martínez-Mián, M.A.; Caballero, P.; Vives-Cases, C.; Davó-Blanes, M.C. Alimentos de producción local en los comedores escolares de España. Gac. Sanit. 2017, 31, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. MAPAMA. Plan de Consumo de Fruta y Verdura en las Escuelas 2016–2017; Gobierno de España: Madrid, Spain, 2017; pp. 1–33.
  15. MAPAMA. Plan de Consumo de Fruta y Verdura en las Escuelas 2013–2014; Gobierno de España: Madrid, Spain, 2014; pp. 1–27.
  16. MAPAMA. Plan de Consumo de Fruta y Verdura en las Escuelas 2012–2013; Gobierno de España: Madrid, Spain, 2013; pp. 1–26.
  17. MAPAMA. Plan de Consumo de Fruta y Verdura en las Escuelas 2014–2015; Gobierno de España: Madrid, Spain, 2015; pp. 1–27.
  18. MAPAMA. Plan de Consumo de Fruta y Verdura en las Escuelas 2015–2016; Gobierno de España: Madrid, Spain, 2016; pp. 1–26.
  19. MARM. Plan de Consumo de Fruta y Verdura en las Escuelas 2010–2011; Gobierno de España: Madrid, Spain, 2011; pp. 1–26.
  20. MARM. Plan de Consumo de Fruta y Verdura en las Escuelas 2011–2012; Gobierno de España: Madrid, Spain, 2012; pp. 1–27.
  21. Ministerio de Educación Cultura y Deporte. Enseñanzas no universitarias. Alumnado matriculado—Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. Available online: http://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/servicios-al-ciudadano/estadisticas/no-universitaria/alumnado/matriculado.html (accessed on 22 October 2018).
  22. Council of the European Union. Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 Stablishing A Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets and on Specific Provisions for Certain Agricultural Products (Single CMO Regulation); Official Journal of the European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2007; pp. 1–149. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mikkilä, V.; Räsänen, L.; Raitakari, O.T.; Pietinen, P.; Viikari, J. Longitudinal changes in diet from childhood into adulthood with respect to risk of cardiovascular diseases: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 58, 1038–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ness, A.R.; Maynard, M.; Frankel, S.; Smith, G.D.; Frobisher, C.; Leary, S.D.; Emmett, P.M.; Gunnell, D. Diet in childhood and adult cardiovascular and all cause mortality: The Boyd Orr cohort. Heart 2005, 91, 894–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Welker, E.; Lott, M.; Story, M. The School Food Environment and Obesity Prevention: Progress Over the Last Decade. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2016, 5, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Sa, J.; Lock, K. Will European agricultural policy for school fruit and vegetables improve public health? A review of school fruit and vegetable programmes. Eur. J. Public Health 2008, 18, 558–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pérez-Rodrigo, C.; Ribas, L.; Serra-Majem, L.; Aranceta, J. Food preferences of Spanish children and young people: The enKid study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 57, S45–S48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wilkins, J.L.; Farrell, T.J.; Rangarajan, A. Linking vegetable preferences, health and local food systems through community-supported agriculture. Public Health Nutr. 2015, 18, 2392–2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bere, E.; Klepp, K.I.; Overby, N.C. Free school fruit: Can an extra piece of fruit every school day contribute to the prevention of future weight gain? A cluster randomized trial. Food Nutr. Res. 2014, 58, 23194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  30. Olsho, L.E.W.; Klerman, J.A.; Ritchie, L.; Wakimoto, P.; Webb, K.L.; Bartlett, S. Increasing Child Fruit and Vegetable Intake: Findings from the US Department of Agriculture Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2015, 115, 1283–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Comité Científico “5 al día”. Raciones de Frutas y Hortalizas en España. Posición del Comité Científico “5 al día”; Asociación para la Promoción del Consumo de Frutas y Hortalizas “5 al día: Barcelona, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bere, E.; Te Velde, S.J.; Småstuen, M.C.; Twisk, J.; Klepp, K.I. One year of free school fruit in Norway—7 years of follow-up. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2015, 12, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  33. Hodder, R.K.; Stacey, F.G.; Wyse, R.J.; O’Brien, K.M.; Clinton-McHarg, T.; Tzelepis, F.; Nathan, N.K.; James, E.L.; Bartlem, K.M.; Sutherland, R.; et al. Interventions for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children aged five years and under. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 9, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Upton, D.; Upton, P.; Taylor, C. Increasing children’s lunchtime consumption of fruit and vegetables: An evaluation of the Food Dudes programme. Public Health Nutr. 2013, 16, 1066–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Roccaldo, R.; Censi, L.; D’Addezio, L.; Berni Canani, S.; Gennaro, L. A teachers’ training program accompanying the “School Fruit Scheme” fruit distribution improves children’s adherence to the Mediterranean diet: An Italian trial. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 68, 887–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Van Cauwenberghe, E.; Maes, L.; Spittaels, H.; Van Lenthe, F.J.; Brug, J.; Oppert, J.M.; De Bourdeaudhuij, I. Effectiveness of school-based interventions in Europe to promote healthy nutrition in children and adolescents: Systematic review of published and grey literature. Br. J. Nutr. 2010, 103, 781–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gold, A.; Larson, M.; Tucker, J.; Strang, M. With Fruit and Vegetable Taste Testing Improves Children’s Dietary Intake. J. Sch. Health 2017, 87, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rosi, A.; Scazzina, F.; Ingrosso, L.; Morandi, A.; Del Rio, D.; Sanna, A. The “5 a day” game: A nutritional intervention utilising innovative methodologies with primary school children. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 66, 713–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Jaime, P.C.; Lock, K. Do school based food and nutrition policies improve diet and reduce obesity? Prev. Med. Balt. 2009, 48, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Øverby, N.C.; Klepp, K.I.; Bere, E. Introduction of a school fruit program is associated with reduced frequency of consumption of unhealthy snacks. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 96, 1100–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. AECOSAN Estrategia NAOS. Estrategia Para la Nutrición, Actividad Física y Prevención de la Obesidad; Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo: Madrid, Spain, 2005; p. 38.
  42. AESAN Programa PERSEO. Guía Para Una Escuela Activa y Saludable. ¡Come Sano y Muévete! Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo: Madrid, Spain, 2008; p. 161.
  43. AECOSAN Programa. Thao-Salud INFANTIL: “La Temporada Temática de Promoción de la Dieta Mediterránea”; Fundación Thao: Barcelona, Spain, 2014; p. 26. [Google Scholar]
  44. Santivañez, T.; Grandos, S.; Jara, B.; Chibbaro, A.H.M. Reflexiones Sobre el Sistema Alimentario y Perspectivas Para Alcanzar su Sostenibilidad en AMÉRICA LATINA y el Caribe; FAO: Santiago de Chile, Chile, 2017; p. 20. [Google Scholar]
  45. Soares, P.; Davó-Blanes, M.C. Comedores escolares en España: Una oportunidad para fomentar sistemas alimentarios más sostenibles y saludables. Gac. Sanit. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. European Commission. Buying Green! A Handbook on Green Public Procurement, 3rd ed.; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2016; p. 80. [Google Scholar]
Ijerph 16 03898 g001
Figure 1. Annual distribution of budget supplied by the EU and the country of Spain for the implementation of the School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme.
Figure 1. Annual distribution of budget supplied by the EU and the country of Spain for the implementation of the School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme.
Ijerph 16 03898 g001
Ijerph 16 03898 g002
Figure 2. Frequency and kinds of fruits and vegetables included in the School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme in Spain (2009–2017).
Figure 2. Frequency and kinds of fruits and vegetables included in the School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme in Spain (2009–2017).
Ijerph 16 03898 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of the School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme in Spain: averages for the 2009–2017 period.
Table 1. Characteristics of the School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme in Spain: averages for the 2009–2017 period.
Academic CourseACStudents (millions)Cost per Student/YearDurationCost per Student/DayQuantity of FV IncludedQuantity of FV per StudentVariety
FV
nn (%)€days€tkgnn
09/10141.29 (18.6)7.89.81.80 205
10/11141.28 (18.2)8.212.40.66 207
11/12151.32 (18.5)8.310.20.812579.51.92211
12/13151.28 (17.9)6.411.20.573992.83.3217
13/14141.12 (15.6)6.912.30.562663.42.4218
14/15141.44 (19.9)7.311.00.663068.82.1179
15/16141.49 (20.5)7.816.20.483464.72.3189
16/17141.45 (20.0)9.919.60.514000.82.82110
AC: autonomous communities; FV: fruits and vegetables F: fruits; V; vegetables.
Table 2. Characteristics of the School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme by AC: averages for the 2009–2017 period.
Table 2. Characteristics of the School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme by AC: averages for the 2009–2017 period.
Geographic AreaEd.BudgetStud. (×1000)Cost × Stud./yr.DurationCost × Stud./DayQuantity of FV per Stud.FV Offered × Day × Stud.VarietyRecommendation of Foods
FruitsVegetablesLocalSeasonalOrganic
nmillions (%)n (%)€days€kggnnNo. of Editions
Spain 12,011.3 (100.0)1334.3 (18.7)9.012.80.712.51957.00.9880
Andalucía82154.6 (17.9)255.2(17.6)8.45.61.92.23936.81.4555
Aragón8555.8 (4.6)60.3 (31.5)9.216.30.82.31416.10.0020
Asturias6290.8 (2.4)26.0 (21.8)11.233.50.63.1938.50.0231
Islas Baleares8158.4 (1.3)27.0 (16.6)5.911.81.80.9769.50.1530
Islas Canarias8459.4 (3.8)28.9 (9.5)15.942.40.65.11208.60.4544
Cantabria3116.7 (1.0)50.4 (64.0)2.37.00.30.2298.71.0222
CLM8745.5 (6.2)49.0 (14.7)15.218.31.52.11159.51.0541
CyL8700.0 (5.8)144.0 (45.6)4.99.90.82.02022.30.8551
Cataluña82149.2 (17.9)297.3 (25.2)7.213.00.93.627713.41.8250
Extremadura7378.2 (3.1)36.7 (22.4)10.313.91.12.41737.70.3450
Galicia7256.6 (2.1)111.3 (32.8)2.317.90.21.47811.00.0554
La Rioja8216.9 (1.8)11.2 (24.1)19.370.82.26.4903.11.7322
Murcia8512.0 (4.3)43.4 (16.7)11.822.81.11.6706.55.5550
Navarra8208.2 (1.7)7.3 (7.4)28.469.90.58.11161.90.3050
País Vasco3125.0 (1.0)13.9 (4.4)9.07.01.30.3434.30.0222
Valencia81767.9 (14.7)231.3 (30.9)7.69.70.71.11133.90.5440
Ed.: number of editions in which they participated; Stud.: student; yr.: year; FV: fruits and vegetables; CLM: Castilla la Mancha; CyL: Castilla y León.
Table 3. Education activities accompanying the School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme for each autonomous community (2009–2017), number of times (first year).
Table 3. Education activities accompanying the School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme for each autonomous community (2009–2017), number of times (first year).
ACRecreational–Educational ActivitiesDidactic MaterialsVisits Training WorkshopsCooking ClassesSchool Gardens
Andalucía7 (2009)7 (2009)1 (2011)5 (2009)6 (2010)1 (2013)
Aragón4 (2011)1 (2016)2 (2015) 1 (2016)
Asturias 2 (2015)1 (2016) 1 (2016)
Islas Baleares3 (2012)2 (2010) 1 (2010)1 (2015)2 (2015)
Islas Canarias3 (2012) 2 (2012)2 (2012)2 (2012)
Cantabria
CLM3 (2013)1 (2009) 3 (2009)
CyL 2 (2015)1 (2016)1 (2016)
Cataluña3 (2011)4 (2010)4 (2010) 1 (2016)
Extremadura3 (2014)2 (2014)3 (2014) 1 (2016)2 (2015)
Galicia1 (2015)1 (2016)2 (2013)
La Rioja2 (2015)2 (2015)2 (2015) 1 (2015)
Murcia6 (2010)3 (2013)4 (2010)3 (2010)1 (2016)1 (2016)
Navarra3 (2013)3 (2014) 1 (2015)
País Vasco2 (2012)1 (2013) 2 (2012)
Valencia2(2010)4 (2010)1 (2016)5 (2010)
TOTAL41332422167

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Soares, P.; Comino, I.; Martínez-Milán, M.A.; Davó-Blanes, M.C.; Altavilla, C.; Caballero, P. Implementation of the European School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme in Spain (2009–2017). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3898. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203898

AMA Style

Soares P, Comino I, Martínez-Milán MA, Davó-Blanes MC, Altavilla C, Caballero P. Implementation of the European School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme in Spain (2009–2017). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(20):3898. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203898

Chicago/Turabian Style

Soares, Panmela, Iris Comino, María Asunción Martínez-Milán, M. Carmen Davó-Blanes, Cesare Altavilla, and Pablo Caballero. 2019. "Implementation of the European School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme in Spain (2009–2017)" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 20: 3898. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203898

APA Style

Soares, P., Comino, I., Martínez-Milán, M. A., Davó-Blanes, M. C., Altavilla, C., & Caballero, P. (2019). Implementation of the European School Fruit and Vegetables Scheme in Spain (2009–2017). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20), 3898. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203898

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop