Next Article in Journal
Mental Disabilities Increase the Risk of Respiratory Infection-related Healthcare Utilization
Previous Article in Journal
Can Between-Session Homework Be Delivered Digitally? A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of CBT for Adjustment Disorders
Open AccessReview

Methods in Experimental Work Break Research: A Scoping Review

1
Department of Management Science, Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
2
Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Dresden, 01099 Dresden, Germany
3
Institute of Movement and Neuroscience, German Sport University Cologne, 50933 Cologne, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(20), 3844; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203844
Received: 12 September 2019 / Revised: 4 October 2019 / Accepted: 6 October 2019 / Published: 11 October 2019
The number of studies on work breaks and the importance of this subject is growing rapidly, with research showing that work breaks increase employees’ wellbeing and performance and workplace safety. However, comparing the results of work break research is difficult since the study designs and methods are heterogeneous and there is no standard theoretical model for work breaks. Based on a systematic literature search, this scoping review included a total of 93 studies on experimental work break research conducted over the last 30 years. This scoping review provides a first structured evaluation regarding the underlying theoretical framework, the variables investigated, and the measurement methods applied. Studies using a combination of measurement methods from the categories “self-report measures,” “performance measures,” and “physiological measures” are most common and to be preferred in work break research. This overview supplies important information for ergonomics researchers allowing them to design work break studies with a more structured and stronger theory-based approach. A standard theoretical model for work breaks is needed in order to further increase the comparability of studies in the field of experimental work break research in the future. View Full-Text
Keywords: experimental design; work break; performance measure; physiological measure; self-report measure; rest break; pause experimental design; work break; performance measure; physiological measure; self-report measure; rest break; pause
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Scholz, A.; Wendsche, J.; Ghadiri, A.; Singh, U.; Peters, T.; Schneider, S. Methods in Experimental Work Break Research: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3844.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop