Next Article in Journal
Local Housing Characteristics Associated with Early Childhood Development Outcomes in Australian Disadvantaged Communities
Next Article in Special Issue
Effectiveness of Diabetes Community Sharp Disposal Education Module in Primary Care: An Experimental Study in North-East Peninsular Malaysia
Previous Article in Journal
The Environmental Impact and Formation of Meals from the Pilot Year of a Las Vegas Convention Food Rescue Program
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Substance Abuse on Blood Glucose Parameters in Patients with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Open AccessFeature PaperReview

The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Glycaemic Control in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

1
Department of Adult Nursing and Paramedic Science, University of Greenwich, London SE9 2UG, UK
2
Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Rd, Whitechapel E1 1BB, UK
3
Department of Psychology, University of Greenwich, London SE10 9LS, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(10), 1716; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101716
Received: 12 April 2019 / Revised: 12 May 2019 / Accepted: 14 May 2019 / Published: 16 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Collection Health Care and Diabetes)
Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent amongst pregnant women and is linked to a range of adverse complications, including gestational diabetes. However, there is no consensus among researchers regarding the impact of vitamin D supplementation in alleviating adverse effects in gestational diabetes. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine whether supplementation of vitamin D given to women with gestational diabetes can promote glycaemic control. EMBASE and PubMed were searched up to November, 2018. The selection criteria included randomised controlled trials of the effect of vitamin D supplementation (1000–4762 IU/day) on pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Study data and outcome measures (fasting blood glucose, glycated haemoglobin and serum insulin) were extracted from included studies. Random-effects models were used for meta-analyses. Heterogeneity tests, and analysis of the risk of bias were conducted. Most of the studies were graded as having either low risk or moderate risk of bias although two studies had a high risk of bias in the areas of blinding of participants and personnel, and incomplete outcome data. On the other hand, the heterogeneity statistic (I2) ranged from 0–41% in the studies included. Five randomised controlled trials were selected for this review and meta-analysis (involving a total of 173 participants supplemented with vitamin D and 153 participants as control drawn from the studies). Vitamin D supplementation was associated with a decrease in fasting blood glucose by a mean of 0.46 mmol/L (−0.68, −0.25) (p < 0.001), glycated haemoglobin by a mean of 0.37% (−0.65, −0.08) (p < 0.01) and serum insulin concentration by mean of 4.10 µIU/mL (−5.50, −2.71) (p < 0.001) compared to controls. This review shows evidence that vitamin D supplementation has the potential to promote glycaemic control in women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM). However, due to the limited number of studies in the meta-analysis, the conclusion should be interpreted with caution. Further studies are needed to fully understand the exact mechanism by which vitamin D influences glucose metabolism. View Full-Text
Keywords: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus; Vitamin D supplementation; meta-analysis; pregnancy; insulin Gestational Diabetes Mellitus; Vitamin D supplementation; meta-analysis; pregnancy; insulin
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Ojo, O.; Weldon, S.M.; Thompson, T.; Vargo, E.J. The Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Glycaemic Control in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1716.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop