Next Article in Journal
Truck and Multivehicle Truck Accidents with Injuries Near Colorado Oil and Gas Operations
Next Article in Special Issue
Learning and Action in Community Health: Using the Health Belief Model to Assess and Educate African American Community Residents about Participation in Clinical Research
Previous Article in Journal
The Human Right to Water and Unconventional Energy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reversing the Trends toward Shorter Lives and Poorer Health for U.S. Women: A Call for Innovative Interdisciplinary Research
Open AccessArticle

A Portfolio Analysis of Culturally Tailored Trials to Address Health and Healthcare Disparities

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Washington, DC 20036, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(9), 1859; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091859
Received: 13 July 2018 / Revised: 30 July 2018 / Accepted: 23 August 2018 / Published: 28 August 2018
In 2010, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) was authorized by Congress to improve the quality and relevance of evidence available to help patients, caregivers, employers, insurers, and policy makers make better-informed health decisions. We conducted a qualitative analysis of behavioral health trials in the PCORI Addressing Disparities portfolio to examine cultural tailoring strategies across the following priority populations: racial and ethnic minorities, rural populations, people with low-income or low socioeconomic status, individuals with disabilities, people with low health literacy, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) communities. The Common Strategies for Enhancing Cultural Appropriateness model was used to examine cultural tailoring strategies within trials. We hypothesized increased intersectionality within a patient population at risk for disparities would correlate with the dosage and type of cultural tailoring strategies applied. Thirty-three behavioral health trials applied cultural tailoring strategies and a majority of trials (n = 30) used three or more strategies. Trends in cultural tailoring were associated with certain racial and ethnic groups; however, increased use of tailoring was not associated with the number of priority populations included in a trial. The PCORI Addressing Disparities portfolio demonstrates how a range of cultural tailoring strategies are used, within comparative clinical effectiveness research trials, to address the needs and intersectionality of patients to reduce health and healthcare disparities. View Full-Text
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; cultural tailoring; disparities; intersectionality; comparative clinical effectiveness research Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; cultural tailoring; disparities; intersectionality; comparative clinical effectiveness research
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Torres-Ruiz, M.; Robinson-Ector, K.; Attinson, D.; Trotter, J.; Anise, A.; Clauser, S. A Portfolio Analysis of Culturally Tailored Trials to Address Health and Healthcare Disparities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1859.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop