Response to Polosa et al. Comments on Scheffler et al. Cytotoxic Evaluation of E-Liquid Aerosol Using Different Lung Derived Cell Models. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2015, 12, 12466-12474
Referring to the comments of Polosa and colleagues [1] on our latest in vitro e-liquid aerosol testing publication, we would like to give our statements about some points. [...] View Full-Text
Scheffler, S.; Dieken, H.; Krischenowski, O.; Aufderheide, M. Response to Polosa et al. Comments on Scheffler et al. Cytotoxic Evaluation of E-Liquid Aerosol Using Different Lung Derived Cell Models. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2015, 12, 12466-12474. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010109
Scheffler S, Dieken H, Krischenowski O, Aufderheide M. Response to Polosa et al. Comments on Scheffler et al. Cytotoxic Evaluation of E-Liquid Aerosol Using Different Lung Derived Cell Models. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2015, 12, 12466-12474. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2016; 13(1):109. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010109
Chicago/Turabian StyleScheffler, Stefanie, Hauke Dieken, Olaf Krischenowski, and Michaela Aufderheide. 2016. "Response to Polosa et al. Comments on Scheffler et al. Cytotoxic Evaluation of E-Liquid Aerosol Using Different Lung Derived Cell Models. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2015, 12, 12466-12474" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 13, no. 1: 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010109