Next Article in Journal
In-Depth Analysis of Exoproteomes from Marine Bacteria by Shotgun Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry: the Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3 Case-Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Temperature Shifts for Extraction and Purification of Zygomycetes Chitosan with Dilute Sulfuric Acid
Previous Article in Journal
Neurotoxic Alkaloids: Saxitoxin and Its Analogs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chitin Research Revisited

Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan Poly(acrylic acid) Magnetic Microspheres

Department of radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215007, China
Key Laboratory of Organic Synthesis of Jiangsu Province, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Soochow University, SIP, Suzhou 215123, China
State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2010, 8(7), 2212-2222;
Received: 16 June 2010 / Revised: 3 July 2010 / Accepted: 7 July 2010 / Published: 23 July 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Chitin and Chitosan)


Spherical microparticles, capable of responding to magnetic fields, were prepared by encapsulating dextran-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles into chitosan poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) microspheres template. The obtained magnetic microspheres were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), and thermogravimetry (TG). The results showed that the microspheres were formed and demonstrated magnetic behavior in an applied magnetic field. In addition, magnetite particles were well encapsulated and the composite particles have high magnetite content, which was more than 40%.
Keywords: magnetic microsphere; magnetic separation; nanoparticles; chitosan poly(acrylic acid) magnetic microsphere; magnetic separation; nanoparticles; chitosan poly(acrylic acid)

1. Introduction

Magnetic microspheres consisting of one or more magnetic nanoparticles have attracted a great deal of attention for their interesting chemical and physical properties. Magnetic microspheres find widespread and diverse application in many fields, such as environment remediation and therapeutic [13] and diagnostic biomedical applications [46]. In recent years, the research has been focused on synthesizing monodispersed, nanoscale spheres for high sensitivity and efficiency [7], achieving high saturation magnetization for fast and sensitive magnetic signal control, manipulation, and detection [7,8] and providing hydrophilic surfaces with various functional groups for covalent coupling to antigens, antibodies, enzymes, or DNA/RNA hybridization [9].
The magnetic microspheres are typically synthesized by various approaches such as the coprecipitation of ferrous and ferric salts under alkaline conditions in the presence of either polymers [1012], heterogeneous polymerization methods, including suspension [13], dispersion polymerization [14], emulsion polymerization [15], miniemulsion polymerization [16,17], emulsifier-free emulsion polymerization [18], dispersion polymerization [19], suspension polymerization [20,21] and microemulsion polymerization [22]. Through emulsion copolymerization, it is possible to introduce suitable functional groups on the surface of polymer microspheres.
Chitosan and its derivatives have been widely used in many biomedical fields for their many significant biological and chemical properties (reactive groups such as -OH and -NH2). As a special functional material, the preparation of magnetic chitosan microsphere has been attracting the researchers for many years [23,24]. However, the chitosan is not suitable to bind directly onto Fe3O4 nanoparticles for that the resultant magnetic composites tend to aggregate for polymer cross-linking and physisorption. Many researchers are looking for suitable methods to modify chitosan and bind onto Fe3O4 particles. Chang et al. prepared carboxymethyl chitosan-Fe3O4 particles via carbodiimide activation [25,26]. The final polymer magnetic microspheres had a high magnetic content, and showed unique pH-dependent behaviors on the size and zeta potential.
The present work is aimed at the synthesis of new chitosan-poly(acrylic acid) (CS-PAA) magnetic microspheres and characterization of the magnetic properties and microstructure. We have prepared water-dispersible superparamagnetic Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles with 20–30 nm by the precipitation method in aqueous solution of dextran [2729]. The chitosan-PAA microspheres were then prepared by polymerizing acrylic acid into chitosan template in aqueous solution. Finally, the Fe3O4 nanoparticles were well-encapsulated in chitosan-PAA microspheres by cross-linking with glutaraldehyde. The size, structure and magnetic properties of the resultant magnetic nanoparticles were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Ferric chloride (FeCl3·6H2O), ferrous sulfate (FeSO4·7H2O) and aqueous ammonia were all of analytic grade. Chitosan with the deacetylation degree (DD) of 90% and the molecular weight (Mw) of 200 kD was purchased from Kabo Biochemical Company (Shanghai, China). Dextran T20 (Mw ≈ 20,000) and glutaraldehyde (GA, 25% aqueous solution) were purchased from the SCRC (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.). Acrylic acid (Shanghai Chemical Reagents Company) (Shanghai, China) was distilled under reduced pressure in nitrogen atmosphere. Potassium persulfate (K2S2O8) was recrystallized from deionized water. All other reagents were of analytical grade and used without further purification.

2.2. Preparation of dextran magnetic fluid

The synthesis of dextran-MF was based on our previous study. In typical synthesis, a mixture of dextran and iron (III) chloride hexahydrate dissolved in 30 mL of deionized water was put into a three-neck flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer, and 0.5 mL hydrazine hydrate was added into the flask. After the mixture was stirred and mixed completely, some sulfate heptahydrate was added. After 15 min, sulfate heptahydrate was dissolved completely, and some ammonia solution was quickly dropped into the mixture with vigorous stirring under argon protection, followed by slowly dropping additional ammonia solution until the pH of the solution reached 10. Soon afterwards the solution was stirred for an additional 3 h in argon atmosphere at the temperature of 60 °C. The black suspension was cooled and purged by centrifugation at a speed of 7000 rpm for 20 min to separate large particles from the suspension, then the liquid at the top of the separation tube was taken out. Excess ammonia, hydrazine and its leftovers, iron cation and dextran macromolecules were removed by dialysis using a membrane bag with a 14,000 cut-off molecular weight for 24 h. The deionized water for dialysis was replaced every 1 h.

2.3. Synthesis of chitosan-PAA nanospheres by polymerization

The chitosan-PAA nanospheres were synthesized according to the method described as follows. Briefly, the chitosan-PAA nanospheres were obtained by polymerization of acrylic acid (AA) in chitosan solution. Chitosan was dissolved in 50 mL acrylic acid solution at the ratio of 1:1 ([aminoglucoside units]:[AA]) under magnetic stirring. The amount of AA was maintained constantly at 3 mmol in all experiments. Until the solution became clear, 0.1 mmol of K2S2O8 was added to the solution with continued stirring. The pH of the suspension was maintained at about 4.0. Then, the polymerization was carried out at 80 °C under a nitrogen stream and magnetic stirring. When the opalescent suspension appeared, the reaction system was cooled, and the opalescent suspension was filtered with paper filter to remove any polymer aggregates. Finally, the residual monomers were removed by dialysis in a buffer solution of pH = 4.5 for 24 h using a dialysis membrane bag with a molecular weight cut-off of 10 kDa. Replacing deionized water every 1 h.

2.4. Preparation of Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA polymer magnetic microspheres

Five mL of dextran-MFs was added to 20 mL of suspension solution of chitosan-PAA nanospheres. Then, 0.2 mL of 25% GA aqueous solution was added to this reaction system to cross-link chitosan, and the cross-linking reaction was allowed to proceed for 2 h. Finally, the resulting product was filtered to remove any possible aggregation. The unloaded magnetite nanoparticles were separated by three or more consecutive cycles whereby the suspension was ultracentrifuged (Ultra Pro 80, 8000 r/min, 277 K), the supernatant was discarded, and the wet solid was resuspended in water.

2.5. Characterization

Crystallographic studies of the pure Fe3O4, Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA microspheres were performed on an X-ray diffractometer (D/Max-IIIC, Japan) using Cu-kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). Distances between peaks were compared to the JCDPS 5-0664 of International Center for Diffraction Data to determine crystalline structures.
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis of the samples was taken on a Nicolet Avatar 360 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were obtained using KBr method.
The morphologies of dextran-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles, chitosan-PAA nanospheres and Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA microspheres were observed by a Hitachi H-600-II transmission electron microscope (TEM) with an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. In this case, a drop of the dilute sample was deposited on a copper grid covered with a formvar-carbon membrane.
The magnetic properties of Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA microspheres synthesized by chitosan-PAA template were measured with a BHV-55 vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM).
Perkin-Elmer TGA-7 was employed to perform the thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA). Dried sample (1–5 mg) was placed in the TGA furnace and the measurements were carried out under nitrogen with a heating rate of 20 °C/min from 50 °C to 900 °C.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns for naked (Figure 1(a)), dextran-coated (Figure 1(b)) and Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA (Figure 1(c)) nanoparticles, respectively. All the diffraction peaks are consistent with the seven diffraction peaks at (2 2 0), (3 1 1), (4 0 0), (4 2 2), (5 1 1), (4 4 0) and (5 5 3) by comparison with Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS card, file No. 79-0418), which are indexed to the cubic spinel phase of Fe3O4. It reveals that the resultant nanoparticles are Fe3O4. The particle sizes can be quantitatively evaluated from the XRD data using the Debye-Scherrer equation, which gives a relationship between peak broadening in XRD and particle size.
D = k λ / ( β · cos θ )
where, k is Sherrer constant (0.89), λ the X-ray wavelength (0.15406 nm), β the peak width of half-maximum, and θ is the Bragg diffraction angle. The crystallite size of the Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA microspheres obtained from this equation was found to be about 100 nm. The peak positions of Fe3O4 nanoparticles are unchanged, which illustrated that the binding process did not result in the phase change of Fe3O4. The peak intensity of Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA composite particles is lower than that of dextran-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles and naked Fe3O4 may due to that the Fe3O4 nanoparticles are incorporated into CA-PAA microspheres.

3.2. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analysis

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra of chitosan, chitosan-PAA polymer microspheres and Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic microspheres are shown in Figure 2. For the IR spectrum of chitosan (Figure 2(a)), the characteristic absorption bands appeared at 1654 cm−1 (amide I), 1600 cm−1 (amide II) and 1383 cm−1 (amide III). The absorption bands of the carboxyl groups of PAA and the -NH2 absorption of chitosan can be observed respectively at 1717 and 1622 cm−1 in the IR spectrum of chitosan-PAA nanoparticles (Figure 2(b)) and 1712 and 1633 cm−1 in that of Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic microspheres (Figure 2(c)). Furthermore, in Figure 2(c), the absorption peaks at 1566 and 1403 cm−1 could be assigned to asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of COO anion groups. These indicate that the carboxylic groups of PAA are dissociated into COO groups which complex with protonated amino groups of chitosan through electrostatic interaction to form the polyelectrolyte complex during the polymerization procedure.

3.3. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

The morphologies of chitosan-PAA microspheres and magnetic Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA composite microspheres were investigated by TEM (Figure 3) and SEM (Figure 4). Figure 3(a) shows the morphology of chitosan-PAA microspheres. It can be observed that the diameter of chitosan-PAA microspheres was about 100 nm. Figure 3(b) illustrates a TEM image of Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA composite microspheres, the average size of the sample is approximately 100 nm, and the results were reasonably consistent with those obtained from XRD. It can be seen from the TEM images that microspheres have excellent dispersibility and the composite particles are spherical in shape and the magnetite particles are encapsulated. The diameter of chitosan-PAA microspheres (Figure 4(a)) is consistent with those observed in Figure 4(b). In Figure 4(b), it can be seen clearly that the dextrancoated Fe3O4 was well encapsulated in the chitosan-PAA microspheres template.

3.4. Magnetic properties

The magnetization curves of the naked Fe3O4 particles (Figure 5(a)) and Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA composite microspheres (Figure 5(b)) recorded with VSM are illustrated in Figure 5. As shown in the figure, the magnetization of the samples would approach the saturation values when the applied magnetic field increases to 10,000 Oe. The saturation magnetization of naked Fe3O4 nanoparticles is 72.5 emu/g. For the Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA composite microspheres, the saturation magnetization is about 29.1 emu/g. The saturation magnetization of the nanoparticles was much less than that of bulk magnetite, which is 84 emu/g [30]. The lower value of the measured saturation magnetization is due to the smaller size of maghematite [31] and low saturation magnetization of Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA composite microspheres may be attributed to lager part in incorporation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles into chitosan-PAA spheres which added mass of the thick polymer layer on the magnetite nanoparticles. When the magnetic component size of the particles is smaller than critical size, the particles will exhibit superparamagnetism. A narrow hysteresis loop can be seen in Figure 5(a) and 5(b) respectively. There is a small remnant magnetization. It might be that some of the particles are magnetically blocked.

3.5. Thermogravimetric analysis (TG)

Thermogravimetric analysis (TG) was used to determine the weight percentage of Fe3O4 in the Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA composite microspheres. Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA composites were measured through the TGA runs in the condition of air atmosphere at the heating rate of 15 °C/min. Figure 6 shows the TGA curves of naked Fe3O4 nanoparticles and Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic microspheres. The TGA curve of naked Fe3O4 shows that the weight loss is about 3% for the whole temperature range. This might be due to the evaporation of absorbed or crystalline water. On the other hand, for Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA composites, below 200 °C the weight loss of all the nanocomposites is quite small (7%) because of the removal of absorbed physical and chemical water. Then the principle chains of chitosan-PAA begin to degrade at about 230 °C and the temperature of final decomposition is around 500 °C, the weight loss is significant (68%). There is no significant weight change from 500 to 900 °C, implying the presence of only iron oxide within the temperature range. Calculation results showed that the magnetic content of composite microspheres can be up to 41.3 wt%.

4. Conclusions

The Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic microspheres were successfully prepared by encapsulating dextran-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles into chitosan-PAA microspheres template. Systematic investigations revealed that this synthetic approach is applicable for producing magnetic polymer microspheres with high magnetite contents. The saturation magnetization of composite nanoparticles could reach 29 emu/g and the nanoparticles showed superparamagnetism. The Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic microspheres have high stability of magnetization. The remarkable advantage of this system is that it is solely made of hydrophilic polymers: chitosan and poly(acrylic acid), which are non-toxic and biodegradable. Therefore, the composite spheres are favorable for their bioapplications.


The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Nos. 20876100 and 20736004), the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, No. 2009CB219904), the State Key Lab. of Multiphase Complex Systems of the Chinese Academy of Science (No. 2006-5), the Key Lab. of Organic Synthesis of Jiangsu Prov., R&D Foundation of Nanjing Medical Univ. (NY0586), Post-doctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu Prov., National Post-doctoral Science Foundation (20090451176), and the Commission of Science and Technology of Suzhou Municipality (YJS0917, SG0978), China.
  • Samples Availability: Available from the authors.


  1. Tartaj, P; Morales, MP; Veintemillas-Verdaguer, S; Gonzalez-Carreno, T; Serna, CJ. The preparation of magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicine. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys 2003, 36, R182–R197. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hafeli, U; Pauer, G; Failing, S; Tapolsky, G. Radiolabeling of magnetic particles with rhenium-188 for cancer therapy. J. Magn. Magn. Mater 2001, 225, 73–78. [Google Scholar]
  3. Johannsen, M; Gneveckow, U; Eckelt, L; Feussner, A; Waldöfner, N; Scholz, R; Deger, S; Wust, P; Loening, SA; Jordan, A. Clinical hyperthermia of prostate cancer using magnetic nanoparticles: Presentation of a new interstitial technique. Int. J. Hyperthermia 2005, 21, 637–647. [Google Scholar]
  4. Neuberger, T; Schöpf, B; Hofmann, H; Hofmann, M; Von Rechenberg, B. Superparamagnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications: Possibilities and limitations of a new drug delivery system. J. Magn. Magn. Mater 2005, 293, 483–496. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mornet, S; Vasseur, S; Grasset, F; Duguet, E. Magnetic nanoparticle design for medical diagnosis and therapy. J. Mater. Chem 2004, 14, 2161–2175. [Google Scholar]
  6. Högemann, D; Josephson, L; Weissleder, R; Basilion, JP. Improvement of MRI Probes to Allow Efficient Detection of Gene Expression. Bioconjug. Chem 2000, 11, 941–946. [Google Scholar]
  7. Weiming, Z; Feng, G; Hongchen, G. Magnetic polymer nanospheres with high and uniform magnetite content. J. Magn. Magn. Mater 2005, 288, 403–410. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ramírez, LP; Landfester, K. Magnetic Polystyrene Nanoparticles with a High Magnetite Content Obtained by Miniemulsion Processes. Macromol. Chem. Phys 2003, 204, 22–31. [Google Scholar]
  9. Křížová, J; Španová, A; Rittich, B; Horák, D. Magnetic hydrophilic methacrylate-based polymer microspheres for genomic DNA isolation. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1064, 247–253. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, Y; Kohler, N; Zhang, M. Surface modification of superparamagnetic magnetite nanoparticles and their intracellular uptake. Biomaterials 2002, 23, 1553–1561. [Google Scholar]
  11. Berry, CC; Wells, S; Charles, S; Curtis, ASG. Dextran and albumin derivatised iron oxide nanoparticles: influence on fibroblasts in vitro. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 4551–4557. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bergemann, C; Muller-Schulte, D; Oster, J; Brassard, L; Lubbe, AS. Magnetic ion-exchange nano- and microparticles for medical, biochemical and molecular biological applications. J. Magn. Magn. Mater 1999, 194, 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang, C; Liu, H; Guan, Y; Xing, J; Liu, J; Shan, G. Preparation of magnetic poly(methylmethacrylate–divinylbenzene–glycidylmethacrylate) microspheres by spraying suspension polymerization and their use for protein adsorption. J. Magn. Magn. Mater 2005, 293, 187–192. [Google Scholar]
  14. Horák, D; Semenyuk, N; Lednicky, F. Effect of the reaction parameters on the particle size in the dispersion polymerization of 2-hydroxyethyl and glycidyl methacrylate in the presence of a ferrofluid. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem 2003, 41, 1848–1863. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kondo, A; Kamura, H; Higashitani, K. Development and application of thermo-sensitive magnetic immunomicrospheres for antibody purification. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 1994, 41, 99–105. [Google Scholar]
  16. Qiu, GH; Wang, Q; Wang, C; Lau, WL; Guo, YL. Polystyrene/Fe3O4 magnetic emulsion and nanocomposite prepared by ultrasonically initiated miniemulsion polymerization. Sonochemistry 2007, 14, 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang, QY; Xie, G; Zhang, HP; Zhang, JP; He, M. Encapsulation of magnetic particles via miniemulsion polymerization of styrene. II. Effect of some parameters on the polymerization of styrene. J. Appl. Polym. Sci 2007, 105, 3525–3530. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, PH; Pan, CY. Polymer-metal composite particles: Metal particles on poly(St-co-MAA) microspheres. J. Appl. Polym. Sci 2000, 75, 1693–1698. [Google Scholar]
  19. Horák, D. Magnetic Polyglycidylmethacrylate Microspheres by Dispersion Polymerization. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys 2001, 39, 3707–3715. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee, YH; Rho, JN; Jung, B. Preparation of magnetic ion-exchange resins by the suspension polymerization of styrene with magnetite. J. Appl. Polym. Sci 2003, 89, 2058–2067. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ma, ZY; Guan, YP; Liu, XQ; Liu, HZ. Preparation and characterization of micron-sized nonporous magnetic polymer microspheres with immobilized metal affinity ligands by modified suspension polymerization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci 2005, 96, 2174–2180. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zaitsev, VS; Filimonow, DS; presnyakov, IA; Gambino, RJ; Chu, BJ. Physical and Chemical Properties of Magnetite and Magnetite-Polymer Nanoparticles and Their Colloidal Dispersions. J. Colloid Interface Sci 1999, 212, 49–57. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chang, YC; Chen, DH. Preparation and adsorption properties of monodisperse chitosan-bound Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles for removal of Cu(II) ions. J. Colloid Interface Sci 2005, 283, 446–451. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kima, EH; Ahnb, Y; Lee, HS. Biomedical applications of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles encapsulated within chitosan. J. Alloys Compd 2007, 434/435, 633–636. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhou, LM; Wang, YP; Liu, ZR; Huang, QW. Carboxymethyl chitosan-Fe3O4 nanoparticles: preparation and adsorption behavior toward Zn2+ ions. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin 2006, 22, 1342–1346. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chang, YC; Chen, DH. Adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics of acid dyes on a carboxymethylated chitosan-conjugated magnetic nanoadsorbent. Macromol. Biosci 2005, 5, 254–261. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cuyper, MD; Joniau, M. Magnetoliposomes. Formation and structural characterization. Eur. Biophys. J 1988, 15, 311–319. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ulrich, AS. Biophysical aspects of using liposomes as delivery vehicles. Biosci. Rep 2002, 22, 129–150. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hernandez-Borrell, J; Mas, F; Puy, J. A theoretical approach to describe monolayer-liposome lipid interaction. Biophys. Chem 1990, 36, 47–55. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yamaura, M; Camilo, RL; Sampaio, LC; Macêdo, MA; Nakamura, M; Toma, HE. Preparation and characterization of (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane-coated magnetite nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater 2004, 279, 210–217. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen, Y; Qian, Z; Zhang, ZC. Novel preparation of magnetite/polystyrene composite particles via inverse emulsion polymerization. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp 2008, 312, 209–213. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectrum: (a) naked Fe3O4; (b) dextran-coated Fe3O4; (c) Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic mirospheres.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectrum: (a) naked Fe3O4; (b) dextran-coated Fe3O4; (c) Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic mirospheres.
Marinedrugs 08 02212f1
Figure 2. FT-IR spectra: (a) chitosan; (b) chitosan-PAA polymer microspheres; (c) Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic microspheres.
Figure 2. FT-IR spectra: (a) chitosan; (b) chitosan-PAA polymer microspheres; (c) Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic microspheres.
Marinedrugs 08 02212f2
Figure 3. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM): (a) chitosan-PAA polymer microspheres; (b) Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic mirospheres.
Figure 3. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM): (a) chitosan-PAA polymer microspheres; (b) Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic mirospheres.
Marinedrugs 08 02212f3
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM): (a) chitosan-PAA polymer microspheres; (b) Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic mirospheres.
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM): (a) chitosan-PAA polymer microspheres; (b) Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic mirospheres.
Marinedrugs 08 02212f4aMarinedrugs 08 02212f4b
Figure 5. Magnetization curves obtained by vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) at room temperature: (a) naked Fe3O4; (b) Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic microspheres.
Figure 5. Magnetization curves obtained by vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) at room temperature: (a) naked Fe3O4; (b) Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic microspheres.
Marinedrugs 08 02212f5
Figure 6. Weight loss curves: (a) naked Fe3O4; (b) Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic microspheres.
Figure 6. Weight loss curves: (a) naked Fe3O4; (b) Fe3O4/chitosan-PAA magnetic microspheres.
Marinedrugs 08 02212f6
Back to TopTop