Next Article in Journal
Regulation of the Spontaneous Augmentation of NaV1.9 in Mouse Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons: Effect of PKA and PKC Pathways
Next Article in Special Issue
Bacteriocin as Weapons in the Marine Animal-Associated Bacteria Warfare: Inventory and Potential Applications as an Aquaculture Probiotic
Previous Article in Journal
Prymnesins: Toxic Metabolites of the Golden Alga, Prymnesium parvum Carter (Haptophyta)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of Novel Drugs from Marine Surface Associated Microorganisms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 8
Issue 3
10.3390/md8030705
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Production of Metabolites as Bacterial Responses to the Marine Environment

by
Carla C. C. R. De Carvalho
* and
Pedro Fernandes
IBB-Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centre for Biological and Chemical Engineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2010, 8(3), 705-727; https://doi.org/10.3390/md8030705
Submission received: 28 January 2010 / Revised: 26 February 2010 / Accepted: 16 March 2010 / Published: 17 March 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Compounds from Marine Microbes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bacteria in marine environments are often under extreme conditions of e.g., pressure, temperature, salinity, and depletion of micronutrients, with survival and proliferation often depending on the ability to produce biologically active compounds. Some marine bacteria produce biosurfactants, which help to transport hydrophobic low water soluble substrates by increasing their bioavailability. However, other functions related to heavy metal binding, quorum sensing and biofilm formation have been described. In the case of metal ions, bacteria developed a strategy involving the release of binding agents to increase their bioavailability. In the particular case of the Fe3+ ion, which is almost insoluble in water, bacteria secrete siderophores that form soluble complexes with the ion, allowing the cells to uptake the iron required for cell functioning. Adaptive changes in the lipid composition of marine bacteria have been observed in response to environmental variations in pressure, temperature and salinity. Some fatty acids, including docosahexaenoic and eicosapentaenoic acids, have only been reported in prokaryotes in deep-sea bacteria. Cell membrane permeability can also be adapted to extreme environmental conditions by the production of hopanoids, which are pentacyclic triterpenoids that have a function similar to cholesterol in eukaryotes. Bacteria can also produce molecules that prevent the attachment, growth and/or survival of challenging organisms in competitive environments. The production of these compounds is particularly important in surface attached strains and in those in biofilms. The wide array of compounds produced by marine bacteria as an adaptive response to demanding conditions makes them suitable candidates for screening of compounds with commercially interesting biological functions. Biosurfactants produced by marine bacteria may be helpful to increase mass transfer in different industrial processes and in the bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated sites. Siderophores are necessary e.g., in the treatment of diseases with metal ion imbalance, while antifouling compounds could be used to treat man-made surfaces that are used in marine environments. New classes of antibiotics could efficiently combat bacteria resistant to the existing antibiotics. The present work aims to provide a comprehensive review of the metabolites produced by marine bacteria in order to cope with intrusive environments, and to illustrate how such metabolites can be advantageously used in several relevant areas, from bioremediation to health and pharmaceutical sectors.

1. Introduction

Marine bacteria have to adapt to the physical, chemical and biological conditions found in the oceanic environment, which is reflected in their physiology and biochemical properties. The presence of a relatively high concentration of Na+ ions in sea water has influenced the requirement for these ions by most marine bacteria [1]. Extreme halophiles can even have optimal growth conditions at 10% (w/v) NaCl [2]. Marine bacteria are also able to live under depleted nutritional conditions and to survive long periods of starvation [3]. Additionally, the vast majority of the marine environment is characterized by low temperatures (below 4 °C) and high pressures (higher than 100 × 105 Pa), which resulted in psychrophilic and barophilic bacteria [4]. There are even bacterial strains with both elevated temperature and alkaline pH optima, being considered poly-extremophiles [2]. Bacterial associations with marine plants and animals have also favored bioluminescent bacteria and in some cases the host organism specifically selects some species of luminous bacteria, preventing the establishment of other species [5].
The diversity of marine environments has exerted a driving force on bacteria selection leading to new adaptive strategies and the synthesis of new metabolites [6,7]. Many of these latter compounds are produced by the bacteria without an apparent function in the growth and development of the bacterial cells and are referred to as secondary metabolites.
Adaptations to the sea conditions can affect secondary metabolite production. For example, of four actinomycetes isolates that produce novel metabolites, all grew to some extent when seawater was replaced by complex fermentation medium in deionized water, but only one of the four was able to produce the metabolite in the absence of seawater [6]. The first bioactive compound produced by a marine actinomycete, an antibiotic obtained from Chainia purpurogena, was reported in 1975 [8]. The production of the metabolite was dependent on the addition of an extract of the seaweed Laminaria, proving that the production of secondary metabolites by marine bacteria could depend on the presence of nutrients from the marine environment.
The quest for interesting bioactive natural products from marine strains has been stimulated by the need for anti-tumor and anti-cancer agents and for efficient antibiotics for multi-resistant strains. Furthermore, it has been suggested that metabolites obtained from algae and invertebrates such as sponges, mollusks and tunicates are in reality produced by microorganisms [9]. Curiously, the 659 marine bacterial compounds described between 1997 and 2008 were isolated from five bacterial phyla (Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria and Actinobacteria), which are the same phyla isolated in parallel studies with terrestrial samples [10].
Molecular approaches such as the extraction of DNA from seawater have shown a much wider bacterial diversity than that obtained by culture-based methods. Cultivation conditions in the laboratory seldom reflect natural conditions found in the sampling site and thereby fast-growing strains are selected (for a review see [11]). The understanding of the mechanisms used by bacteria in the diverse marine microhabitats will allow the use of the proper selection pressure to maintain a high production level of commercially interesting compounds.

2. Adaptive Mechanisms

2.1. Adaptation at the cellular membrane: Production of specialized lipids

The maintenance of the integrity of the cellular membrane is vital to bacterial cells, since it acts as a permeability barrier to solutes, is responsible for the maintenance of the energy status of the cells, for signal transduction and other energy-transduction processes and for keeping turgor pressure [12]. The ability of bacteria to maintain biological functions under stressful conditions results from changes in protein, sterol, hopanoid and carotenoid content, but mainly from changes in membrane lipid composition [13,14]. The cells try to keep the membrane fluidity by making changes in the degree of saturation of the fatty acids of the membrane phospholipids through a mechanism called “homeoviscous adaptation” [15]. Bacterial adaptation may involve isomerisation of cis to trans fatty acids, changes in the saturated to unsaturated fatty acid ratio and in the long-chain to short chain fatty acid ratio, modifications in the phospholipid headgroups and in alteration in the outer membrane proteins and lipopolysaccharides [16–18]. In marine environments, in order to survive under extreme temperature, pressure and salinity conditions, bacteria have to be able to adapt their membranes to maintain biological functions. Among the adaptive mechanisms described, those leading to modifications of the membrane to keep the same level of fluidity have been reported most intensively.
In general, higher salinity concentrations cause an increase in the content of negatively charged phospholipids at the expense of neutral phospholipids. Gram-negative bacteria decrease the proportion of zwitterionic phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) in the membrane with simultaneous increase in the proportion of the negatively charged phosphatidylglycerol (PG) and/or diphosphatidylglycerol (cardiolipin, CL) [19,20]. The changes in polar lipid composition could preserve the membrane bilayer structure, since PG forms bilayers whilst PE containing unsaturated fatty acids tends to form non-bilayer phases. In Gram-positive bacteria, the anionic lipid fraction increases with salinity due to an increase in the percentage of CL rather than of PG [20]. Changes in the cellular membrane that confer an advantage under a certain stress may also further help the cells. For example, strains that have membranes with a high degree of saturation because they were grown under high pressure conditions will be better adapted to compete for available nutrients under high salinity conditions.
The outer layer of Gram-negative bacteria is mainly constituted of lipopolysaccharides (LPS), which are usually organized into three subdomains: a glycolipid region (lipid A), the oligosaccharide of the core, and a polysaccharide referred as O-specific polysaccharide (OPS). The OPS of marine bacteria are often anionic in what could be seen as an adaptation to the marine environment: negative sites on the polysaccharide allow the formation of ionic interactions mediated by divalent cations [21]. This results in a stronger membrane packaging, confering an increased stability towards environmental stress such as high pressure. The shortening of the fatty acids in lipid A has been observed as a short term response to cold stress in mesophilic bacteria and the shortening of fatty acids in the glycolipids could be seen as an evolutionary adaptation of obliged psycrophiles [21].
Bacteria are also masters at changing the fatty acid composition of their membranes in response to environmental stresses. Oceanimonas baumannii presented two different adaptive stages with increasing salinity: at 0.15–1% NaCl (w/v) the ratio of zwitterionic:anionic phospholipids increased and the percentage of saturated fatty acids decreased; whereas at 1–7% NaCl the zwitterionic:anionic phospholipids ratio decreased but the saturated:unsaturated fatty acid ratio was unaffected [22]. An increase in the saturation degree of the membrane phospholipids of bacteria growing in high concentrations of salt will decrease the fluidity of the cell membrane and will make the cell more resistant to bursting under osmotic shock [23].
Oil spills occur often in ecosystems with high or moderate salinities, such as the sea, estuaries and seashores, and thus bioremediation of alkanes and other oil compounds must be carried out under saline and non-optimal temperature conditions. Since both salinity and growth temperature influence the cellular hydrophobicity, the uptake of the hydrocarbons can also be quite influenced [24] and thus the rate at which a site is cleaned.
In phsychrophiles, the very cold rigidifying conditions are overcome by incorporation of specific fatty acids to maintain membrane fluidity and transport of substrates and nutrients across the membrane. In the Gram-positive Marinococcus halophilus, an increase in salinity or temperature had the same response: an increase in the content of saturated fatty acids (mainly 18:0) and a decrease in the content of the branched chain 15:0 ante-iso fatty acids [20].
Bacteria have traditionally been considered unable to produce poly-unsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), but deep sea isolates have been found to contain PUFAs such as docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in their membranes. Bacteria containing PUFAs have been isolated from deep sea fish, sediments, seawater and amphipods [25]. The response of a facultatively barophilic strain to increased pressure and also to low temperature included a decrease in the amount of saturated fatty acids in PE and an increase in PUFAs, including DHA [25]. In PG, the decrease in saturated fatty acids was accompanied by an increase in DHA. Similar patterns were observed in an obligately barophilic strain, suggesting that unsaturated fatty acids including DHA are important in maintaining fluidity conditions under high pressure. However, other studies have shown that the role of DHA and EPA are not exclusive in adaptation to high pressure, and could also influence adaptation to temperature and salinity. Cells of Vibrio marinus MP-1 grown at 20 °C contained only 17% of the DHA produced when the cells were grown at 5 °C [4]. However, the work of Valentine and Valentine suggested that the cells are able to choose from a wide array of phospholipids structures to maintain membrane fluidity in different environments [26]. Omega-3 bacteria have at least three distinct routes for producing fluidizing lipids such as methyl-branched and mono-unsaturated lipids in addition to the EPA and DHA routes. Since pressure, temperature and the concentration of ions affect a variety of biological functions, biological adaptation should not be a single-site phenomenon.
Bacterial cells are also able to produce fatty acids as defense compounds. For example, Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis produces isovaleric acid (3-methylbutanoic acid) and 2-methylbutyric acid (2-methylbutanoic acid), which have antibacterial activities [27].
Sterols play a relevant role in the physiology and biochemistry of all eukaryotic organisms. As part of the cell membrane, they control its fluidity and permeability. Besides this well-established role, sterols can be involved in the control of membrane related metabolic processes, are the precursors for a wide array of relevant metabolites for cellular and developmental processes (i.e., steroid hormones, ecdysteroids), and have also been reported to be involved in signal transduction events in higher organisms [28–30]. Examples of the structure of some common sterols are given in Figure 1. Marine monohydroxy sterols present however a wider diversity than those from terrestrial sources, given the large number of substitutions and rearrangements, which lead to a vast array of side chains [29,30]. Some marine microorganisms, namely microalgae, were shown to change the sterol concentrations as response to environmental stimuli [31].
With the notable exception of members of the family Methylococcaceae, bacteria do not produce sterols, but they do produce hopanoids: pentacyclic compounds that play a role similar to sterols at the cell wall level [32,33]. Thus, hopanoids have been suggested to contribute to ruling membrane fluidity and to decreasing the diffusion of ions across the cell membrane [34]. The fact that the hopanoid content of some bacteria increases in response to environmental stress, such as to temperature increases and to the presence of alcohols, seems to support such claims [35,36]. Recently, however, some controversy has arisen, given the relatively low number of potential hopanoid-producing bacteria, which suggests that hopanoids may play a yet unidentified key role in bacteria [37]. Hopanoids have typically been regarded as derivatives of aerobic organisms. Nevertheless, their biosynthesis has been observed in several anaerobic bacteria [38], one of these being Desulfovibrio bastinii, a sulfate-reducing bacteria widely found in marine environments [39].

2.2. Production of exopolymers and biosurfactants

Bacterial exopolysaccharides, or more generally exopolymeric substances (EPS), have several functions including protection from desiccation, cryoprotection, stabilization of enzymes by buffering pH and salinity fluctuations, surface adherent, nutrient storage and sequestration of toxic compounds. Polysaccharides represent in general 40–95% of the EPS [40], but proteins, nucleic acids and lipids can also be found in the matrix formed by cells in biofilms and aggregates. The majority of the marine bacteria studied produce heteropolysaccharides with three or four different monosaccharides (e.g., pentoses, hexoses, amino sugars or uronic acids) arranged in groups of ten or less repeating units [41]. Functional groups such as sulfate and phosphate, which are negatively charged above pH 7, may also be present. Negatively charged EPS may bind selectively to dissolved iron (Fe2+ and Fe3+) acting as an organic ligand [41], decreasing the rate of oxidation of dissolved iron and increasing the bioavailability of iron in the sea water. A new exopolymer from Pseudoalteromonas sp. strain TG12 exhibits both high emulsifying activities and the capacity to desorb various mono-, di-, and trivalent metal species from marine sediments, probably due to its high content of uronic acids [42].
The benefit given by the EPS must compensate the important carbon and energy investment required by the bacterial cells for their production [43]. Most of the marine bacteria studied produce the largest quantity of EPS during stationary phase [44], under nutrient (e.g., nitrogen, phosphorous, sulfur, potassium) depletion conditions [45] or in response to environmental stress [41]. The Pseudoalteromonas tunicata, which usually forms biofilms on the surface of eukaryotic organisms produces several extracellular inhibitory compounds, including an antibacterial protein alleged to help this bacterium compete for space and nutrients on surfaces [46]. The protection given by the EPS matrix to cells in biofilms will be further discussed in the next section.
Novel EPS have been isolated from marine bacteria, especially from those collected in the deep-sea near hydrothermal vents. This environment is characterized by high pressure and temperature, as well as high levels of sulfur and heavy metals. Several of the mesophilic, thermophilic and hyperthermophilic bacterial strains isolated have been able to produce EPS in the laboratory [47]. When screened for therapeutical use, these EPS have been found useful in tissue regeneration, and for the treatment of cardiovascular and oncological diseases [46]. Some of the properties conferred by the EPS to the cells that produce them and the properties of the EPS that have been exploited are listed in Table 1.
The bacterium V. diabolicus produces an unusual EPS with a high percentage of osamines and containing glucuronic acid, N-acetyl-glucosamine and N-acetylgalactosamine [51]. This polymer was found to be a strong bone-healing material in an experimental model. The structure and chemical characteristics of bacterial EPS may also be modified to obtain desired properties. An EPS obtained from A. infernus was modified to obtain new heparin-like compounds [51]. The resulting EPS, contrary to the native one, presented anticoagulant properties similar to heparin, suggesting that by carrying out modifications in natural EPS their functionality and specificity may be improved.
Some of the EPS from marine bacteria have biosurfactant properties, decreasing the surface tension of the media and increasing the bioavailability of low water soluble compounds. One of the fractions obtained from the crude biosurfactants of B. circulans reduced efficiently the surface tension of water from 72 to 28 mN/m [52]. Additionally, the lipopeptide biosurfactant fraction also presented antimicrobial activity against several Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogenic and semi-pathogenic strains including some multidrug-resistant pathogenic clinic isolates. The Halomonadaceae sp. strain MM1 produces a novel surface-active glycolipid which increases chlorinated biphenyl degradation probably by helping solubilization of these usually low soluble compounds in water [48]. The marine α-proteobacterium Antarctobacter sp. TG22 produced an extracellular emulsifying agent, which was found to be a high molecular weight glycoprotein with high uronic acid content [55]. The emulsion-stabilizing properties of the polymer were comparable to that of xanthan gum and gum Arabic for a range of different food oils. H. eurihalina F2-7 produces a potent emulsifying agent with pseudoplastic behavior that forms gels at high viscosity at acidic pH [56]. Halomonas species produce emulsifiers effective in a wide range of food oils under both neutral and acidic pH conditions, even under high temperature and acidic conditions [57]. More than 200 bacterial strains isolated from oil wells and related environments were able to produce EPS [49]. The predominant facultative anaerobe belonging to the Bacillus species, and growing at up to 12% NaCl, produced a polysaccharide (containing glucose, arabinose, mannose, ribose and low contents of allose and glucosamine) with pseudoplastic behavior, and resistance to shear stress and thermal degradation.

2.3. Biofilm formation and quorum sensing

As mentioned in the previous section, extracellular polymers enhance the adaptability and survival rate of bacteria in marine environments, especially under extreme conditions. The EPS change the physical and biogeochemical microenvironment around the cell [58]. The matrix of a biofilm can also bind and concentrate metal ions, metalloids and molecules, with the binding and release of metal ions (e.g., Cd2+, Cu2+, Pb2+, Fe2+) depending on the EPS composition and physical gel state, on the pH and salinity [59]. Marine biofilm populations can even combat protozoan predators using chemically mediated resistance [60]. Nanomolar concentrations of violacein, an alkaloid produced by biofilm cells, induce a conserved eukaryotic cell death process thus inhibiting protozoan feeding. This mechanism of protection could explain both the persistence of bacterial biofilms in various environments and the production of eukaryote-targeting bacterial metabolites. One key factor for the environmental survival and transmission of Vibrio species is the ability to form biofilms [61].
The development of biofilms is thought to be mediated by chemical compounds that act as signals and that are released by bacteria in a density-dependent manner. The process called “quorum sensing” [62] induce synchronized physiological changes in cells by releasing of signals, or auto-inducers, when a threshold concentration is reached. At least five types of quorum sensing (QS) systems have been identified: three “archetypal” systems to Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria; a fourth that has been described only in Myxococcus xanthus; and a fifth system described in Pseudomonas aeruginosa [63]. Since horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is promoted at high bacterial cell concentration and Roseobacter species produce acyl homoserine lactones, which are known to be involved in QS in Gram-negative bacteria, Wilson and Salyers questioned if HGT could be enhanced in high cell communities such as biofilms and marine snow [64].
The discovery of N-acylhomoserine lactone as a QS signal was first made in the luminescent marine bacteria V. fischeri and V. harveyi. The LuxI/R system of V. fischeri is the paradigm of Gram-negative quorum sensing systems even though it is not found in all vibrios [65]. This could demonstrate the flexibility of the Vibrio genome in responding to a myriad of activities under highly variable marine conditions and the role of QS signaling in biological diversification.
The extraordinary diversity of marine metabolites has also showed that some strains can produce inhibitors of QS of other bacteria. Halobacillus salinus, a Gram-positive bacterium, secretes two phenetrylamide metabolites able of quenching quorum sensing-controlled processes in several Gram-negative strains including bioluminescence in V. harveyi, violacein biosynthesis in Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 and green fluorescent protein production in Escherichia coli JB525 [66]. Apparently, the two non toxic metabolites compete with N-acyl homoserine lactones for the receptor binding site. The development of quorum sensing inhibitors could help the development of sound strategies against biofilm-forming pathogens.

3. Production of Secondary Metabolites

3.1. Terpenes and terpenoids

Terpenes, which are compounds derived from isoprene units, are widely spread throughout nature, mainly in plants as constituents of essential oils. For his contribution to the identification and characterization of terpenes from essential oils, Geheimrat Otto Wallach was awarded with the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1910. More than 25,000 individual terpenes and terpenoids, their oxygenated derivatives, are known, which makes this probably the largest group of natural products. The large majority of known terpenes are derived from terrestrial sources, in particular from plants and fungi. Studies describing the biotransformation using enzymes, cell extracts or whole cells of bacteria, cyanobacteria, yeasts and microalgae have also been published (for a review see [67]). However, marine terpenes have been scarcely studied, and the knowledge of the biochemical processes involved in their synthesis is still limited except for a few algae and marine invertebrates. Terpenes have a variety of roles in mediating antagonistic and beneficial interactions among organisms and physiological functions (for a review see [68], including membrane stabilization, anti-oxidant properties, signaling and protection.
The majority of the bacteria occurring in the sea are chromogenic. The carotenoids produced by marine bacteria do not differ significantly from terrestrial bacteria, the main characteristics being a comparative lack of hydrocarbon carotenoids, synthesis of polydroxy compounds and inability to synthesize lutein [69]. A gene encoding for lycopene β-monocyclase, which metabolizes the carotene lycopene to γ-carotene, was isolated from strain P99-3 (previously Flavobacterium sp.) that produced myxol, a γ-carotene derivative. To understand the variability of proteorhodopsin proteins, which are bacterial retinal-binding membrane pigments that function as light-driven proton pumps in the marine ecosystem, Sabehi and co-workers surveyed large bacterial artificial chromosome libraries from the Mediterranean and Red Seas using Southern hybridization and newly designed general degenerated PR primers [70]. The study showed that bacteria producing proteorhodopsin proteins are an important component of the microbial communities in the photic zone of both seas and that several phylogenetically diverse genes encode functional light-driven proton pumps. These bacteria are well adapted to oligotrophic marine surface waters by exploiting both light and a few reduced organic sulfur compounds for energy production.
Saprospira grandis, which besides being heterotrophic on organic substrates has the ability to prey on other bacteria that are captured by secreted mucilage [71], produces a series of neoverrucosane diterpenoids (example given in Figure 2), rarely produced by prokaryotes [72,73]. The only bacterium reported to produce diterpenoids, apart from filamentous actinomycetes, is the hyperthermophile Gram-negative bacterium Chloroflexus aurantiacus [74]. In this case, the verrucosane-2β-ol produced has apparently a function in modulating membrane fluidity similar to that of hopanoids and steroids in other microorganisms. The major pigment produced by S. grandis was identified as the red xanthophyll saproxanthin.
In 2007, Schulz and Dickschat published an extensive review on the production of volatiles by bacteria [75]. Among the myriad of compounds presented, several are produced as secondary metabolites of marine bacteria, including the following: (4R,5Z)-dodec-5-en-4-olide by the α-proteobacteria Loktanella and Dinoroseobacter (Figure 2); iso- and anteiso-branched γ- and δ-lactones by Streptomyces caviscabies; 2-phenylethanol produced by a marine Artic bacterium, by two Roseobacter strains, by Staphylococcus xylosus, and several streptomycetes.
The increasing number of terpenes reported from marine bacteria suggests that there should be a high number of these compounds still to be isolated and characterized. Their role in bacterial cell physiology is also unknown in most cases.

3.2. Production of siderophores

Most microorganisms depend on iron for diverse cell processes, namely respiration, photosynthesis or production of pigments. In the presence of low-iron environments, such as the ocean seawater, where the dissolved iron level is roughly of 20 pM to 1 nM [76–78], several microorganisms respond by synthesizing low molecular weight molecules (0.4–1.5 kDa) with strong iron binding capabilities. These molecules, termed siderophores, scavenge, solubilize and ultimately transport iron (III) inside the cell [79–81]. Still, it has been suggested that the contribution of siderophores for iron complexation is far more relevant in coastal seawater than in the open ocean, where they only contribute 0.2–4.6% of the dissolved iron complexation capacity [82].
The Fe(III)-siderophore complexes are quite stable, since the stability constants range from 1025 to 1050 for such metal-ligand complexes [83–85]. This extreme ability of siderophores for iron chelation creates a driving force for its application in food, feed and health. Siderophores are thus being used both for iron nutrition in several organisms [86–92], as well as for reduction in iron overload under given medical condition through deferration [92–96]. The application of siderophores has moved beyond iron overload conditions [97], since iron deprivation is a suitable approach for therapy of breast cancer [98], malaria [99], and microbial infection through immunomodulatory action [10] or through the synthesis of siderophore-antibiotic conjugates (i.e., pyoverdin/β-lactams). In the latter approach, the cell mechanisms for iron uptake are used, so that the iron complex is transported into the cell, allowing the large substituent to decrease the hydrolytic activity of enzymes towards the antibiotic [100]. Promising results were also obtained when siderophores were used for the therapy of other non-iron overload conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis, cardiac poisoning, solid tumors, hematological malignancies and aluminium related pathologies [92,101]. Siderophores have been furthermore shown to play a role in the solubilization of iron (hydro)oxides [80]. Siderophore production is regulated by quorum sensing in given bacteria [102], but it has also been shown that siderophores can also have some cell signaling function, in particular when coupled to homoserine lactone compounds, already known to be chemical signals for several gram-negative strains [103,104]. Siderophores can thus contribute to intra/interspecies communication in natural seawater. The growth of bacteria harboring no detectable siderophore or homoserine lactone production capability was stimulated by some siderophores (i.e., desferrioxamine, N,N′-bis (2,3-dihydroxybenzoyl)-O-serylserine) produced by other microorganisms in seawater [103,104]. Occasionally the production of siderophores by non-producing strains was induced by siderophores produced by a different species of marine bacteria [103,104]. The enhanced cell growth promoted by the combined use of siderophores and homoserine lactones eased culture isolation, suggesting this approach is prone to detect more diversity by pushing forward the capability for isolation and growth of marine microorganisms in vivo [103,104]. Pyoverdine was also shown to act as a signaling molecule by triggering the expression of genes that form part of the regulon in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, thus controlling the production of some virulence factors that are excreted by this bacteria [105].
Desferrioxamine B was also shown to form stable complexes with uranium (VI). The different species of the uranyldihydroxo complex formed had stability constants within 1017–1023 [106]. Some siderophores can also form complexes with boron. It has been thus evidenced that borate and Fe3+ actually compete for binding to microbial siderophores [107,108]. Systematic analysis of data gathered on this matter suggests that the relevant functionality for boron binding is the presence of vicinal dianionic oxygen in the binding group (i.e., catecholate or citrate) present in the backbone of the siderophore molecule [109]. Unlike iron, boron is available in relatively high concentrations in marine environments, therefore despite being an essential micronutrient for known dietary requirement for various phytoplankton, boron scarcity is not an issue when the primary growth requirements of marine (micro)organisms is considered. Given the potential toxicity of boron at high concentrations, there is rather the need for control mechanisms in marine species [109]. On the other hand, it has been suggested that the boron binding capability may be required for the resulting siderophore complex to act as a signaling/quorum sensing molecule [107,109]. Boron is also an essential micronutrient for all higher terrestrial plants among other terrestrial organisms. Albeit, boron is again toxic at high environmental concentration, the terrestrial environment is boron-poor, thus boron binding siderophores may be of use in this matter [109]. Siderophores have also been shown to recognize, bind and promote biofilm formation through cell adhesion to metal oxides, such as titanium oxide [110].
The number of siderophore structures from marine microorganisms is relatively scarce when compared with those from terrestrial microorganisms. This may be partially ascribed to the tapping of marine resources for this class of compounds being undertaken more recently. Unlike terrestrially produced siderophores, those originated from marine microorganisms are vastly amphiphilic [111,112]. It has been suggested that this latter feature allows the binding of siderophores to the cell membrane, preventing its loss by dilution in the marine environment [111]. Siderophores naturally present in seawater have been isolated from sampling sites in the Atlantic Ocean. Ferrioxamines G and E, particularly the former, were widely distributed in the sites in dissolved form. Amphibactins were also identified in the supernatant of cultures of Atlantic Ocean seawaters incubated under controlled conditions, during the stationary phase. Amphibactins were not detected in dissolved form otherwise. Again this overall behavior can be ascribed to the particular nature of the siderophores, since ferrioxamines have a hydrophilic nature, and amphibactins are associated to cell membrane, given their amphiphilic nature [113]. On the other hand, ferrioxamines, which are hydroxamate siderophores, are the most stable marine siderophores and do not react when exposed to sunlight, regardless of Fe(III) complexation [114]. Ferrrioxamines and other non-photoactive siderophores can thus contribute significantly for increasing the residence time of iron in surface water as well as to induce the dissolution of iron-containing materials. The ability of siderophores produced by the marine bacterium Alteromonas haloplanktis to dissolve ferric hydroxides illustrates the latter concept [115]. Borer and co-workers [80] also showed that even in the absence of electron donors, aerobactin accelerated the light-induced dissolution of Fe(III) oxides, an effect that was ascribed to the efficient transfer of reduced surface Fe(II) into solution, alongside with the photolysis of the corresponding surface complexes. These findings clearly establish siderophores as one of the players in the dissolution of iron-containing materials in the marine systems.
Two major patterns for the wide majority of marine sidephores have been pinpointed. On the one hand, are suites of amphiphilic siderophores containing a Fe(III)-binding headgroup and a fatty acid appendage with variable chain length. On the other hand, are siderophores containing α-hydroxycarboxylic acid moieties (i.e., citric acid or β-hydroxyaspartic acid), which are photoreactive when coordinated to Fe(III) [116,117]. Most of the siderophores with known structures are produced by α- and γ-proteobacteria (i.e., Halomonas spp., Marinobacter spp., Vibrio spp.) [112,118]. Cyanobacteria have not typically been known to produce many siderophores, and only a limited number of these compounds from coastal cyanobacteria has been characterized [116,119–124]. Among these are anachelin, schizokinen and synechobactin [124], that have been furthermore suggested as promising metabolites for the development of therapeutic drugs for the treatment of persistent metal toxicity [124]. There are several heterotrophic bacteria and fungi that also produce siderophores [125–127]. Within the photosynthetic picocyanobacteria and eukaryotic microorganisms that inhabit the open ocean no siderophore production has been detected, suggesting that these organisms adapted to the diluted ocean environment by developing uptake pathways involving a reduction step to free bound iron [124,128]. Whereas the full identification of siderophores from bacterial sources is well established, the full identification of siderophores from marine fungi is lagging behind. Thus, although 24 marine fungal strains have been shown to produce siderophores, only those from Penicillium bilaii, from Cuninghamella elegans ATCC36112 and from Aureobasidium pullulans HN6.2 are well characterized [127,129]. Examples of all these are given in Table 2.
When bacteria are under iron starvation, siderophores bind to Fe3+, yielding a thermodynamically very stable ferrisiderophore, [146]. The resulting complex transports iron inside the cell, across the outer and inner membrane, in an energy-dependent process, where ATP hydrolysis takes place [81,112]. For this uptake to occur, outer membrane receptor proteins are required to selectively recognize the complex formed [147]. Once the intracellular concentration of iron matches the titer required to cope with the physiological demand, the biosynthesis of both siderophores and receptor protein are repressed [139]. Extensive information on the mechanisms of iron uptake by microorganisms can be found elsewhere [148]. Catecholates, hydroxamates, and α-hydroxycarboxylates and, to a lesser extent, carboxylate groups, are the most common binding groups of bacterial siderophores [80]. Typical coordination mechanisms of Fe(III) with marine siderophores are given in Table 3.
As part of natural iron chelators, marine siderophores are clearly relevant players in aquatic ecosystems due to the role played in the iron cycle. They can furthermore contribute to the development of therapeutic drugs and food supplements, targeted at specific conditions, as well as in the development of biosensors and biofilms [149].

4. Final Remarks

The full chemical potential of marine bacteria is still far from established. Recent technological improvements have considerably enhanced this field of studies, for example, high pressure liquid chromatography with diode array detection for metabolite assessment, mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance to determine the identity and structure of the compounds and even the possibility of analyzing whole-cell MALDI-TOF MS spectral profiles. The use of fluorescent specific dyes to assess cellular physiology and the structure of cell aggregates and biofilms will also contribute to the study of the particularities of adaptive mechanisms in marine bacteria.
The major obstacle to the full assessment of bacterial metabolites and adaptive mechanisms is, however, the difficulty to reproduce in laboratory the conditions usually found by the bacteria in natural stressful environments. Unfortunately, it is still common to find differences in bacterial diversity measured from the counting of cultures obtained in the laboratory from natural samples and the diversity assessed directly in those samples by the application of molecular techniques. Hopefully, the recent advances in analytical methodologies will enable us to clarify the particular biochemical mechanisms and potential of marine bacteria.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal (program Ciência2007) for financial support.

References and Notes

  1. Macleod, RA. Question of existence of specific marine bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 1965, 29, 9–23. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowers, K; Mesbah, N; Wiegel, J. Biodiversity of poly-extremophilic Bacteria: Does combining the extremes of high salt, alkaline pH and elevated temperature approach a physicochemical boundary for life. Saline Syst 2009, 5, 9. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wai, SN; Mizunoe, Y; Yoshida, S. How Vibrio cholerae survive during starvation. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999, 180, 123–131. [Google Scholar]
  4. Delong, EF; Yayanos, AA. Properties of the glucose-transport system in some deep-sea bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1987, 53, 527–532. [Google Scholar]
  5. Reichelt, JL; Nealson, K; Hastings, JW. The specificity of symbiosis: Pony fish and luminescent bacteria. Arch Microbiol 1977, 112, 157–161. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jensen, PR; Fenical, W. Marine bacterial diversity as a resource for novel microbial products. J Ind Microb Biotechnol 1996, 17, 346–351. [Google Scholar]
  7. Valentine, DL. Adaptations to energy stress dictate the ecology and evolution of the Archaea. Nature Rev Microbiol 2007, 5, 316–323. [Google Scholar]
  8. Okazaki, T; Kitahara, T; Okami, Y. Studies on marine microorganisms .4. New antibiotic Ss-228 Y produced by Chainia isolated from shallow sea mud. J Antibiot 1975, 28, 176–184. [Google Scholar]
  9. Proksch, P; Edrada, RA; Ebel, R. Drugs from the seas - current status and microbiological implications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2002, 59, 125–134. [Google Scholar]
  10. Williams, PG. Panning for chemical gold: marine bacteria as a source of new therapeutics. Trends Biotechnol 2009, 27, 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bull, AT; Stach, JEM. Marine actinobacteria: new opportunities for natural product search and discovery. Trends Microbiol 2007, 15, 491–499. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sikkema, J; Debont, JAM; Poolman, B. Mechanisms of membrane toxicity of hydrocarbons. Microbiol Rev 1995, 59, 201–222. [Google Scholar]
  13. Heipieper, HJ; Weber, FJ; Sikkema, J; Keweloh, H; Debont, JAM. Mechanisms of resistance of whole cells to toxic organic-solvents. Trends Biotechnol 1994, 12, 409–415. [Google Scholar]
  14. Weber, FJ; deBont, JAM. Adaptation mechanisms of microorganisms to the toxic effects of organic solvents on membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Biomembr 1996, 1286, 225–245. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sinensky, M. Homeoviscous adaptation–homeostatic process that regulates viscosity of membrane lipids in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1974, 71, 522–525. [Google Scholar]
  16. Segura, A; Duque, E; Mosqueda, G; Ramos, JL; Junker, F. Multiple responses of Gram-negative bacteria to organic solvents. Environ Microbiol 1999, 1, 191–198. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sardessai, Y; Bhosle, S. Tolerance of bacteria to organic solvents. Res Microbiol 2002, 153, 263–268. [Google Scholar]
  18. de Carvalho, C; Wick, LY; Heipieper, HJ. Cell wall adaptations of planktonic and biofilm Rhodococcus erythropolis cells to growth on C5 to C16 n-alkane hydrocarbons. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2009, 82, 311–320. [Google Scholar]
  19. Vreeland, RH; Anderson, R; Murray, RG. Cell wall and phospholipid composition and their contribution to the salt tolerance of Halomonas elongata. J Bacteriol 1984, 160, 879–883. [Google Scholar]
  20. Russell, NJ. Adaptive modifications in membranes of halotolerant and halophilic microorganisms. J Bioenerg Biomembr 1989, 21, 93–113. [Google Scholar]
  21. Leone, S; Silipo, A; Nazarenko, EL; Lanzetta, R; Parrilli, M; Molinaro, A. Molecular structure of endotoxins from gram-negative marine bacteria: An update. Mar Drugs 2007, 5, 85–112. [Google Scholar]
  22. Brown, GR; Sutcliffe, IC; Cummings, SP. Combined solvent and water activity stresses on turgor regulation and membrane adaptation in Oceanimonas baumannii ATCC 700832. Anton Leeuw 2003, 83, 275–283. [Google Scholar]
  23. Montgomery, MT; Boyd, TJ; Osburn, CL; Plummer, RE; Masutani, SM; Coffin, RB. Desalination technology waste streams: Effect of pH and salinity on metabolism of marine microbial assemblages. Desalination 2009, 249, 861–864. [Google Scholar]
  24. de Carvalho, C; da Fonseca, MMR. Degradation of hydrocarbons and alcohols at different temperatures and salinities by Rhodococcus erythropolis DCL 14. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2005, 51, 389–399. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yano, Y; Nakayama, A; Yoshida, K. Distribution of polyunsaturated fatty acids in bacteria present in intestines of deep-sea fish and shallow-sea poikilothermic animals. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997, 63, 2572–2577. [Google Scholar]
  26. Valentine, RC; Valentine, DL. Omega-3 fatty acids in cellular membranes: a unified concept. Prog Lipid Res 2004, 43, 383–402. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hayashida-Soiza, G; Uchida, A; Mori, N; Kuwahara, Y; Ishida, Y. Purification and characterization of antibacterial substances produced by a marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis strain. J Appl Microbiol 2008, 105, 1672–1677. [Google Scholar]
  28. Baker, BJ; Kerr, RG. Biosynthesis of marine sterols. Top Curr Chem 1993, 167, 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hartmann, MA. Plant sterols and the membrane environment. Trends Plant Sci 1998, 3, 170–175. [Google Scholar]
  30. Volkman, JK. Sterols in microorganisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2003, 60, 495–506. [Google Scholar]
  31. Fabregas, J; Aran, J; Morales, ED; Lamela, T; Otero, A. Modification of sterol concentration in marine microalgae. Phytochemistry 1997, 46, 1189–1191. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kannenberg, EL; Poralla, K. Hopanoid biosynthesis and function in bacteria. Naturwissenschaften 1999, 86, 168–176. [Google Scholar]
  33. Schouten, S; Bowman, JP; Rijpstra, WIC; Damste, JSS. Sterols in a psychrophilic methanotroph Methylosphaera hansonii. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2000, 186, 193–195. [Google Scholar]
  34. Poralla, K; Kannenberg, E; Blume, A. A Glycolipid containing hopane isolated from the acidophilic, thermophilic Bacillus acidocaldarius, has a cholesterol-like function in membranes. Febs Lett 1980, 113, 107–110. [Google Scholar]
  35. Joyeux, C; Fouchard, S; Llopiz, P; Neunlist, S. Influence of the temperature and the growth phase on the hopanoids and fatty acids content of Frateuria aurantia (DSMZ 6220. Fems Microbiol. Ecol 2004, 47, 371–379. [Google Scholar]
  36. Schmidt, EW. From chemical structure to environmental biosynthetic pathways: navigating marine invertebrate-bacteria associations. Trends Biotechnol 2005, 23, 437–440. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pearson, A; Page, SRF; Jorgenson, TL; Fischer, WW; Higgins, MB. Novel hopanoid cyclases from the environment. Environ Microbiol 2007, 9, 2175–2188. [Google Scholar]
  38. Talbot, HM; Summons, RE; Jahnke, LL; Cockell, CS; Rohmer, M; Farrimond, P. Cyanobacterial bacteriohopanepolyol signatures from cultures and natural environmental settings. Org Geochem 2008, 39, 232–263. [Google Scholar]
  39. Blumenberg, M; Oppermann, BI; Guyoneaud, R; Michaelis, W. Hopanoid production by Desulfovibrio bastinii isolated from oilfield formation water. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2009, 293, 73–78. [Google Scholar]
  40. Flemming, HC; Wingender, J. Relevance of microbial extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) - Part I: structural and ecological aspects. Water Sci Technol 2001, 43, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  41. van der Merwe, P; Lannuzel, D; Nichols, CAM; Meiners, K; Heil, P; Norman, L; Thomas, DN; Bowie, AR. Biogeochemical observations during the winter-spring transition in East Antarctic sea ice: evidence of iron and exopolysaccharide controls. Mar Chem 2009, 115, 163–175. [Google Scholar]
  42. Gutiérrez, T; Shimmield, T; Haidon, C; Black, K; Green, DH. Emulsifying and metal ion binding activity of a glycoprotein exopolymer produced by Pseudoalteromonas sp. strain TG12. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74, 4867–4876. [Google Scholar]
  43. Harder, W; Dijkhuizen, L. Physiological-responses to nutrient limitation. Annu Rev Microbiol 1983, 37, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  44. Manca, MCLL; Improta, R; Esposito, A; Gambacorta, A; Nicolaus, B. Chemical composition of two exopolysaccharides from Bacillus thermoantarcticus. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996, 62, 3265–3269. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sutherland, IW. Bacterial exopolysaccharides. Adv Microb Physiol 1972, 8, 143–213. [Google Scholar]
  46. Debnath, M; Paul, AK; Bisen, PS. Natural bioactive compounds and biotechnological potential of marine bacteria. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2007, 8, 253–260. [Google Scholar]
  47. Chi, Z; Fang, Y. Exopolysaccharides from marine bacteria. J Ocean Univ Chin 2005, 4, 67–74. [Google Scholar]
  48. Yakimov, MM; Golyshin, PN; Lang, S; Wagner, F; Moore, E; Abraham, WR; Timmis, KN. New moderate halophilic marine strain MM1 produces novel class of biosurfactants, abstr. 182. Abstracts of the First International Congress on Extremophiles, Estoril, Portugal; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  49. Pfiffner, SM; McInerney, MJ; Jenneman, GE; Knapp, RM. Isolation of halotolerant, thermotolerant, facultative polymer-producing bacteria and characterization of the exopolymer. Appl Environ Microbiol 1986, 51, 1224–1229. [Google Scholar]
  50. Decho, AW; Herndl, GJ. Microbial activities and the transformation of organic-matter within mucilaginous material. Sci Total Environ 1995, 165, 33–42. [Google Scholar]
  51. Colliec-Jouault, S; Zanchetta, P; Helley, D; Ratiskol, J; Sinquin, C; Fischer, AM; Guezennec, J. Exopolysaccharides produced by bacteria isolated from deep-sea hydrothermal vents: new agents with therapeutic potential. Pathol Biol 2004, 52, 127–130. [Google Scholar]
  52. Das, P; Mukherjee, S; Sen, R. Antimicrobial potential of a lipopeptide biosurfactant derived from a marine Bacillus circulans. J Appl Microbiol 2008, 104, 1675–1684. [Google Scholar]
  53. Egan, S; James, S; Kjelleberg, S. Identification and characterization of a putative transcriptional regulator controlling the expression of fouling inhibitors in Pseudoalteromonas tunicata. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002, 68, 372–378. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sangnoi, Y; Srisukchayakul, P; Arunpairojana, V; Kanjana-Opas, A. Diversity of marine gliding bacteria in Thailand and their cytotoxicity. Electron J Biotechnol 2009, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gutiérrez, T; Mulloy, B; Bavington, C; Black, K; Green, DH. Partial purification and chemical characterization of a glycoprotein (putative hydrocolloid) emulsifier produced by a marine bacterium. Antarctobacter Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2007, 76, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar]
  56. Quesada, E; Bejar, V; Calvo, C. Exopolysaccharide production by Volcaniella eurihalina. Experientia 1993, 49, 1037–1041. [Google Scholar]
  57. Gutiérrez, T; Mulloy, B; Black, K; Green, DH. Glycoprotein emulsifiers from two marine Halomonas species: chemical and physical characterization. J Appl Microbiol 2007, 103, 1716–1727. [Google Scholar]
  58. Costerton, JW. Structure and function of the cell envelope of gram-negative bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 1974, 38, 87–110. [Google Scholar]
  59. Decho, AW. Microbial biofilms in intertidal systems: an overview. Cont Shelf Res 2000, 20, 1257–1273. [Google Scholar]
  60. Matz, C; Webb, JS; Schupp, PJ; Phang, SY; Penesyan, A; Egan, S; Steinberg, P; Kjelleberg, S. Marine biofilm bacteria evade eukaryotic predation by targeted chemical defense. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2744. [Google Scholar]
  61. Yildiz, FH; Visick, KL. Vibrio biofilms: so much the same yet so different. Trends Microbiol 2009, 17, 109–118. [Google Scholar]
  62. Fuqua, C; Winans, SC; Greenberg, EP. Census and consensus in bacterial ecosystems: the LuxR-LuxI family of quorum sensing transcriptional regulators. Annu Rev Microbiol 1996, 50, 727–751. [Google Scholar]
  63. Lyon, P. From quorum to cooperation: lessons from bacterial sociality for evolutionary theory. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 2007, 38, 820–833. [Google Scholar]
  64. Wilson, BA; Salyers, AA. Is the evolution of bacterial pathogens an out-of-body experience. Trends Microbiol 2003, 11, 347–350. [Google Scholar]
  65. Milton, DL. Quorum sensing in vibrios: Complexity for diversification. Int J Med Microbiol 2006, 296, 61–71. [Google Scholar]
  66. Teasdale, ME; Liu, JY; Wallace, J; Akhlaghi, F; Rowley, DC. Secondary metabolites produced by the marine bacterium Halobacillus salinus that inhibit quorum sensing-controlled phenotypes in Gram-negative bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75, 567–572. [Google Scholar]
  67. de Carvalho, C; da Fonseca, MMR. Biotransformation of terpenes. Biotechnol Adv 2006, 24, 134–142. [Google Scholar]
  68. Gershenzon, J; Dudareva, N. The function of terpene natural products in the natural world. Nat Chem Biol 2007, 3, 408–414. [Google Scholar]
  69. Courington, DP; Goodwin, TW. A survey of the pigments of a number of chromogenic marine bacteria, with special reference to the carotenoids. J Bacteriol 1955, 70, 568–571. [Google Scholar]
  70. Sabehi, G; Loy, A; Jung, K.-H; Partha, R; Spudich, JL; Isaacson, T; Hirschberg, J; Wagner, M; Béjà, O. New insights into metabolic properties of marine bacteria encoding proteorhodopsins. PLoS Biol 2005, 3, e273. [Google Scholar]
  71. Lewin, RA. Saprospira grandis: A flexibacterium that can catch bacterial prey by “ixotrophy”. Microb Ecol 1997, 34, 232–236. [Google Scholar]
  72. Mincer, TJ; Spyere, A; Jensen, PR; Fenical, W. Phylogenetic analyses and diterpenoid production by marine bacteria of the Genus. Saprospira Curr Microbiol 2004, 49, 300–307. [Google Scholar]
  73. Spyere, A; Rowley, DC; Jensen, PR; Fenical, W. New neoverrucosane diterpenoids produced by the marine gliding bacterium Saprospira grandis. J Nat Prod 2003, 66, 818–822. [Google Scholar]
  74. Hefter, J; Richnow, HH; Fischer, U; Trendel, JM; Michaelis, W. (−)-Verrucosan-2-beta-ol from the phototrophic bacterium Chloroflexus aurantiacus–1st report of a verrucosan-type diterpenoid from a prokaryote. J Gen Microbiol 1993, 139, 2757–2761. [Google Scholar]
  75. Schulz, S; Dickschat, JS. Bacterial volatiles: the smell of small organisms. Nat Prod Rep 2007, 24, 814–842. [Google Scholar]
  76. Wu, J; Luther, GW, III. Spatial and temporal distribution of iron in the surface water of the northwestern Atlantic Ocean. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1996, 60, 2729. [Google Scholar]
  77. De Baar, HJW; De Jong, JTM. Distribution, sources and sinks of iron in seawater. In The Biogeochemistry of Iron in Seawater; Turner, DR, Hunter, KA, Eds.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2001; Chapter 5; pp. 123–253. [Google Scholar]
  78. Measures, CI; Landing, WM; Brown, MT; Buck, CS. High-resolution Al and Fe data from the Atlantic Ocean CLIVAR-CO2 repeat hydrography A16N transect: extensive linkages between atmospheric dust and upper ocean geochemistry. Global Biogeochem Cycles 2008, 22, GB1005. [Google Scholar]
  79. Neilands, JB. Siderophores of bacteria and fungi. Microbiol Sci 1984, 1, 9–14. [Google Scholar]
  80. Borer, PM; Sulzberger, B; Reichard, P; Kraemer, SM. Effect of siderophores on the light-induced dissolution of colloidal iron(III) (hydr)oxides. Mar Chem 2005, 93, 179–193. [Google Scholar]
  81. Rastogi, RP; Sinha, RP. Biotechnological and industrial significance of cyanobacterial secondary metabolites. Biotechnol Adv 2009, 27, 521–539. [Google Scholar]
  82. Mawji, E; Gledhill, M; Milton, JA; Tarran, GA; Ussher, S; Thompson, A; Wolff, GA; Worsfold, PJ; Achterberg, EP. Hydroxamate siderophores: occurrence and importance in the Atlantic Ocean. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42, 8675–8680. [Google Scholar]
  83. Albrecht-Gary, AM; Crumbliss, AL. Coordination chemistry of siderophores: thermodynamics and kinetics of iron chelation and release. Met Ions Biol Syst 1998, 35, 239–327. [Google Scholar]
  84. Borer, PM; Sulzberger, B; Reichard, P; Kraemer, SM. Effect of siderophores on the light-induced dissolution of colloidal iron(III) (hydr)oxides. Mar Chem 2005, 93, 179–193. [Google Scholar]
  85. Zhang, G; Amin, SA; Küpper, FC; Holt, PD; Carrano, CJ; Butler, A. Ferric stability constants of representative marine siderophores: marinobactins, aquachelins, and petrobactin. Inorg Chem 2009, 48, 11466–11473. [Google Scholar]
  86. Becker, JO; Messens, E; Hedges, RW. The influence of agrobactin on the uptake of ferric iron by plants. Fems Microbiol Ecol 1985, 31, 171–175. [Google Scholar]
  87. Crowley, DE; Reid, CPP; Szaniszlo, PJ. Utilization of microbial siderophores in iron acquisition by Oat. Plant Physiol 1988, 87, 680–685. [Google Scholar]
  88. Shenker, M; Oliver, I; Helmann, M; Hadar, Y; Chen, Y. Utilization by tomatoes of iron mediated by a siderophore produced by Rhizopus arrhizus. J Plant Nutr 1992, 15, 2173–2182. [Google Scholar]
  89. Sharma, A; Johri, BN. Growth promoting influence of siderophore-producing Pseudomonas strains GRP3A and PRS9 in maize (Zea mays L.) under iron limiting conditions. Microbiol Res 2003, 158, 243–248. [Google Scholar]
  90. Siebner-Freibach, H; Hadar, Y; Chen, Y. Siderophores sorbed on Ca-montmorillonite as an iron source for plants. Plant Soil 2003, 251, 115–124. [Google Scholar]
  91. Siebner-Freibach, H; Hadar, Y; Chen, Y. Interaction of iron chelating agents with clay minerals. Soil Sci Soc Am J 2004, 68, 470–480. [Google Scholar]
  92. Chincholkar, SB; Chaudhari, BL; Rane, MR. Microbial siderophores in human and plant health-care. In Microbial Siderophores; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 205–217. [Google Scholar]
  93. Crosa, JH. Deferration using anguibactin siderophore. 1995. US Patent 5393777.
  94. Lindsey, WT; Olin, BR. Deferasirox for transfusion-related iron overload: A clinical review. Clin Ther 2007, 29, 2154–2166. [Google Scholar]
  95. Cappellini, MD; Pattoneri, P. Oral iron chelators. Annu Rev Med 2009, 60, 25–38. [Google Scholar]
  96. Taher, A; El-Beshlawy, A; Elalfy, MS; Al Zir, K; Daar, S; Habr, D; Kriemler-Krahn, U; Hmissi, A; Al Jefri, A. Efficacy and safety of Deferasirox, an oral iron chelator, in heavily iron-overloaded patients with beta-thalassaemia: the ESCALATOR study. Eur J Haematol 2009, 82, 458–465. [Google Scholar]
  97. Manning, T; Kean, G; Thomas, J; Thomas, K; Corbitt, M; Gosnell, D; Ware, R; Fulp, S; Jarrard, J; Phillips, D. Iron chelators in medicinal applications–chemical equilibrium considerations in pharmaceutical activity. Curr Med Chem 2009, 16, 2416–2429. [Google Scholar]
  98. Pahl, PMB; Horwitz, MA; Horwitz, KB; Horwitz, LD. Desferri-exochelin induces death by apoptosis in human breast cancer cells but does not kill normal breast cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001, 69, 69–79. [Google Scholar]
  99. Rotheneder, A; Fritsche, G; Heinisch, L; Mollmann, U; Heggemann, S; Larcher, C; Weiss, G. Effects of synthetic siderophores on proliferation of Plasmodium falciparum in infected human erythrocytes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002, 46, 2010–2013. [Google Scholar]
  100. Budzikiewicz, H. Siderophore-antibiotic conjugates used as Trojan Horses against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Curr Top Med Chem 2001, 1, 73–82. [Google Scholar]
  101. Voest, EE; Vreugdenhil, G; Marx, JJM. Iron-chelating agents in non-iron overload conditions. Ann Intern Med 1994, 120, 490–499. [Google Scholar]
  102. Sandy, M; Butler, A. Microbial iron acquisition: marine and terrestrial siderophores. Chem Rev 2009, 109, 4580–4595. [Google Scholar]
  103. Guan, LL; Onuki, H; Kamino, K. Bacterial growth stimulation with exogenous siderophore and synthetic N-acyl homoserine lactone autoinducers under iron-limited and low-nutrient conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000, 66, 2797–2803. [Google Scholar]
  104. Guan, LL; Kanoh, K; Kamino, K. Effect of exogenous siderophores on iron uptake activity of marine bacteria under iron-limited conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001, 67, 1710–1717. [Google Scholar]
  105. Lamont, IL; Beare, PA; Ochsner, U; Vasil, AI; Vasil, ML. Siderophore-mediated signaling regulates virulence factor production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2002, 99, 7072–7077. [Google Scholar]
  106. Mullen, LGC; Czerwinski, K. Complexation of uranium(VI) with the siderophore desferrioxamine B. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2007, 273, 683–688. [Google Scholar]
  107. Amin, SA; Kupper, FC; Green, DH; Harris, WR; Carrano, CJ. Boron binding by a siderophore isolated from marine bacteria associated with the toxic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum. J Am Chem Soc 2007, 129, 478–479. [Google Scholar]
  108. Harris, WR; Amin, SA; Kupper, FC; Green, DH; Carrano, CJ. Borate binding to siderophores: Structure and stability. J Am Chem Soc 2007, 129, 12263–12271. [Google Scholar]
  109. Carrano, CJ; Schellenberg, S; Amin, SA; Green, DH; Kupper, FC. Boron and marine life: a new look at an enigmatic bioelement. Mar Biotechnol 2009, 11, 431–440. [Google Scholar]
  110. Zurcher, S; Wackerlin, D; Bethuel, Y; Malisova, B; Textor, M; Tosatti, S; Gademann, K. Biomimetic surface modifications based on the cyanobacterial iron chelator anachelin. J Am Chem Soc 2006, 128, 1064–1065. [Google Scholar]
  111. Martinez, JS; Carter-Franklin, JN; Mann, EL; Martin, JD; Haygood, MG; Butler, A. Structure and membrane affinity of a suite of amphiphilic siderophores produced by a marine bacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2003, 100, 3754–3759. [Google Scholar]
  112. Vraspir, JM; Butler, A. Chemistry of marine ligands and siderophores. Annu Rev Mar Sci 2009, 1, 43–63. [Google Scholar]
  113. Mawji, E; Gledhill, M; Milton, JA; Tarran, GA; Ussher, S; Thompson, A; Wolff, GA; Worsfold, PJ; Achterberg, EP. Hydroxamate siderophores: occurrence and importance in the Atlantic Ocean. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42, 8675–8680. [Google Scholar]
  114. Barbeau, K; Rue, EL; Trick, CG; Bruland, KT; Butler, A. Photochemical reactivity of siderophores produced by marine heterotrophic bacteria and cyanobacteria based on characteristic Fe(III) binding groups. Limnol Oceanogr 2003, 48, 1069–1078. [Google Scholar]
  115. Yoshida, T; Hayashi, K; Ohmoto, H. Dissolution of iron hydroxides by marine bacterial siderophore. Chem Geol 2002, 184, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  116. Butler, A; Theisen, RM. Iron(III)-siderophore coordination chemistry: Reactivity of marine siderophores. Coord Chem Rev 2010, 254, 288–296. [Google Scholar]
  117. Homann, VV; Edwards, KJ; Webb, EA; Butler, A. Siderophores of Marinobacter aquaeolei: petrobactin and its sulfonated derivatives. Biometals 2009, 22, 565–571. [Google Scholar]
  118. Stackebrandt, E; Murray, RGE; Trüper, HG. Proteobacteria classis nov., a name for the phylogenetic taxon that includes the “Purple Bacteria and Their Relatives”. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1988, 38, 321–325. [Google Scholar]
  119. Armstrong, JE; Van Baalen, C. Iron transport in microalgae: the isolation and biological activity of a hydroxamate siderophore from the blue-green alga Agmenellum quadruplicatum. J Gen Microbiol 1979, 111, 253–262. [Google Scholar]
  120. Wilhelm, SW; Trick, CG. Iron-limited growth of cyanobacteria: multiple siderophore production is a common response. Limnol Oceanogr 1994, 39, 1979–1984. [Google Scholar]
  121. Ito, Y; Butler, A. Structure of synechobactins, new siderophores of the marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002. Limnol. Oceanogr 2005, 50, 1918–1923. [Google Scholar]
  122. Itou, Y; Okada, S; Murakami, M. Two structural isomeric siderophores from the freshwater cyanobacterium Anabaena cylindrica (NIES-19). Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9093–9099. [Google Scholar]
  123. Ito, Y; Ishida, K; Okada, S; Murakami, M. The absolute stereochemistry of anachelins, siderophores from the cyanobacterium Anabaena cylindrica. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 9075–9080. [Google Scholar]
  124. Hopkinson, BM; Morel, FMM. The role of siderophores in iron acquisition by photosynthetic marine microorganisms. Biometals 2009, 22, 659–669. [Google Scholar]
  125. Brown, CM; Trick, CG. Response of the cyanobacterium, Oscillatoria tenuis, to low iron environments: the effect on growth rate and evidence for siderophore production. Arch Microbiol 1992, 157, 349–354. [Google Scholar]
  126. Li, J; Chi, Z. Siderophores from marine microorganisms and their applications. J Ocean Univ Chin 2004, 3, 40–47. [Google Scholar]
  127. Holinsworth, B; Martin, J. Siderophore production by marine-derived fungi. BioMetals 2009, 22, 625–632. [Google Scholar]
  128. Scanlan, DJ; Ostrowski, M; Mazard, S; Dufresne, A; Garczarek, L; Hess, WR; Post, AF; Hagemann, M; Paulsen, I; Partensky, F. Ecological genomics of marine Picocyanobacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2009, 73, 249–299. [Google Scholar]
  129. Capon, RJ; Stewart, M; Ratnayake, R; Lacey, E; Gill, JH. Citromycetins and bilains A-C: new aromatic polyketides and diketopiperazines from Australian marine-derived and terrestrial Penicillium spp. J Nat Prod 2007, 70, 1746–1752. [Google Scholar]
  130. Haygood, MG; Holt, PD; Butler, A. Aerobactin production by a planktonic marine Vibrio sp. Limnol Oceanogr 1993, 38, 1091–1097. [Google Scholar]
  131. Martinez, JS; Carter-Franklin, JN; Mann, EL; Martin, JD; Haygood, MG; Butler, A. Structure and membrane affinity of a suite of amphiphilic siderophores produced by a marine bacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2003, 100, 3754–3759. [Google Scholar]
  132. Jalal, MAF; Hossain, MB; Vanderhelm, D; Sandersloehr, J; Actis, LA; Crosa, JH. Structure of anguibactin, a unique plasmid-related bacterial siderophore from the fish pathogen Vibrio anguillarum. J Am Chem Soc 1989, 111, 292–296. [Google Scholar]
  133. Barbeau, K; Rue, EL; Bruland, KW; Butler, A. Photochemical cycling of iron in the surface ocean mediated by microbial iron(III)-binding ligands. Nature 2001, 413, 409–413. [Google Scholar]
  134. Martinez, JS; Zhang, GP; Holt, PD; Jung, HT; Carrano, CJ; Haygood, MG; Butler, A. Self-assembling amphiphilic siderophores from marine bacteria. Science 2000, 287, 1245–1247. [Google Scholar]
  135. Takahashi, A; Nakamura, H; Kameyama, T; Kurasawa, S; Naganawa, H; Okami, Y; Takeuchi, T; Umezawa, H. Bisucaberin, a new siderophore, sensitizing tumor-cells to macrophage-mediated cytolysis. 2. Physicochemical properties and structure determination. J Antibiot 1987, 40, 1671–1676. [Google Scholar]
  136. Winkelmann, G; Schmid, DG; Nicholson, G; Jung, G; Colquhoun, DJ. Bisucaberin–A dihydroxamate siderophore isolated from Vibrio salmonicida, an important pathogen of farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). BioMetals 2002, 15, 153–160. [Google Scholar]
  137. Martinez, JSH; MG; Butler, A. Identification of a natural desferrioxamine siderophore produced by a marine bacterium. Limnol Oceanogr 2001, 46, 420–424. [Google Scholar]
  138. Wang, WL; Chi, Z; Liu, GL; Buzdar, MA; Chi, ZM; Gu, QQ. Chemical and biological characterization of siderophore produced by the marine-derived Aureobasidium pullulans HN6.2 and its antibacterial activity. Biometals 2009, 22, 965–972. [Google Scholar]
  139. Homann, VV; Sandy, M; Tincu, JA; Templeton, AS; Tebo, BM; Butler, A. Loihichelins A-F, a suite of amphiphilic siderophores produced by the marine bacterium Halomonas LOB-5. J Nat Prod 2009, 72, 884–888. [Google Scholar]
  140. Martin, JD; Ito, Y; Homann, VV; Haygood, MG; Butler, A. Structure and membrane affinity of new amphiphilic siderophores produced by Ochrobactrum sp SP18. J Biol Inorg Chem 2006, 11, 633–641. [Google Scholar]
  141. Barbeau, K; Zhang, GP; Live, DH; Butler, A. Petrobactin, a photoreactive siderophore produced by the oil-degrading marine bacterium Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus. J Am Chem Soc 2002, 124, 378–379. [Google Scholar]
  142. Hickford, SJH; Kupper, FC; Zhang, GP; Carrano, CJ; Blunt, JW; Butler, A. Petrobactin sulfonate, a new siderophore produced by the marine bacterium Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus. J Nat Prod 2004, 67, 1897–1899. [Google Scholar]
  143. Manwar, AV; Khandelwal, SR; Chaudhari, BL; Meyer, JM; Chincholkar, SB. Siderophore production by a marine Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its antagonistic action against phytopathogenic fungi. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2004, 118, 243–251. [Google Scholar]
  144. Simpson, FB; Neilands, JB. Siderochromes in cyanophyceae: isolation and characterization of schizokinen from Anabaena sp. J Phycol 1976, 12, 44–48. [Google Scholar]
  145. Okujo, N; Saito, M; Yamamoto, S; Yoshida, T; Miyoshi, S; Shinoda, S. Structure of Vulnibactin, a new polyamine-containing siderophore from Vibrio vulnificus. Biometals 1994, 7, 109–116. [Google Scholar]
  146. Renshaw, JC; Robson, GD; Trinci, APJ; Wiebe, MG; Livens, FR; Collison, D; Taylor, RJ. Fungal siderophores: structures, functions and applications. Mycol Res 2002, 106, 1123–1142. [Google Scholar]
  147. Armstrong, E; Granger, J; Mann, EL; Price, NM. Outer-membrane siderophore receptors of heterotrophic oceanic bacteria. Limnol Oceanogr 2004, 49, 579–587. [Google Scholar]
  148. Cornelis, P. Andrews, SC, Ed.; Iron Uptake and Homeostasis in Microorganisms; Caister Academic Press: Norwich, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  149. Gademann, K. Cyanobacterial natural products for the inhibition of biofilm formation and biofouling. Chimia 2007, 61, 373–377. [Google Scholar]
Marinedrugs 08 00705f1 1024
Figure 1. Chemical structure of common sterols.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of common sterols.
Marinedrugs 08 00705f1
Marinedrugs 08 00705f2 1024
Figure 2. Examples of terpenes produced by marine bacteria.
Figure 2. Examples of terpenes produced by marine bacteria.
Marinedrugs 08 00705f2
Table
Table 1. Functions and applications of exopolymeric substances produced by marine bacteria.
Table 1. Functions and applications of exopolymeric substances produced by marine bacteria.
Examples of functions of EPS in bacterial cells
Type of EPSFunctionBacteriumReference
GlycolipidBiosurfactantHalomonadaceae sp. strain MM1[48]
PolysaccharideBenefit during competition for space and nutrients on surfacesPseudoalteromonas tunicata[46]
PolysaccharideAllow survival in oilwellsBacillus sp.[49]
Polysaccharide and proteinsHelps microbial interactionsNocardia amarae[50]
Examples of applications of EPS from marine bacteria
BacteriumApplicationsReference
Alteromonas infernusBone-healing material[51]
Bacillus circulansBiosurfactant; antimicrobial action[52]
Vibrio and AlteromonasTissue regeneration; antithrombotic effects[46]
P. tunicataAntifouling activity[53]
Flavobacterium uliginosaAntitumor activity[54]
Bacillus sp.Pseudoplastic behavior[49]
Table
Table 2. Some siderophores produced by marine microorganisms that have been recently described. Apart from their common Fe(III) scavenging nature, other (potential) roles or noticeable features are referred to.
Table 2. Some siderophores produced by marine microorganisms that have been recently described. Apart from their common Fe(III) scavenging nature, other (potential) roles or noticeable features are referred to.
SiderophoreProducerCommentsReference
AerobactinVibrio sp. DS40M5, SD004, SD101, SD102, SD248-[130]
AmphibactinsVibrio sp. R-10Amphiphilic cell associated siderophores. This feature can be ascribed to the membrane affinities of amphibactins, which range from 3.8 × 103 to 8.3 × 102 M−1, clearly exceeding those for other amphiphilic siderophores.[131]
AnachelinsAnabaena cylindrica NIES-19-[122,123]
AnguibactinVibrio anguillarum 775Backbone derived from ω-N-hydroxyhistamine, cysteine, and 2,3- dihydroxybenzoic acid. Producing strain is a fish pathogen[132]
AquachelinsHalomonas aquamarina DS40M3Contain a given peptidic head group that coordinates Fe(III), alongside with an appendage of a fatty acid moiety. Aquachelins display low critical micelle concentration. Production by open ocean bacteria[133,134]
BisucaberinAlteromonas haloplanktis, Vibrio salmonicida (fish pathogen)Anti-tumor activity[135,136]
Desferrioxamine GStrain BLI-41Structurally similar to desferrioxamine B, but for the substitution of a terminal methyl group by a propionic acid moiety[137]
FusigenAureobasidium pullulans HN6.2Anti-bacterial activity tested against the pathogen Vibrio anguillarum[138]
Loihichelins A–FHalomonas sp. LOB-5Potential role in the promotion of Mn(II) and Fe(II) oxidation[139]
MarinobactinsMarinobacter sp. DS40M6 and DS40M8In the presence of Fe(III) marinobactins undergo a spontaneous phase change to form vesicles. In the absence of iron, they are present as micelles at concentration over the critical micelle concentration.[133]
Ochrobactins A–COchrobactrum sp. SP18Membrane-associated citrate-type photoreactive siderophore, amphiphilic derivatives of aerobactin[140]
Petrobactin and sulfonated derivatives thereofMarinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus, Marinobacter aquaeoleiSulfonation takes place in an aromatic ring of petrobactin and is considered to increase the water solubility of the aromatic compounds, as well as to reduce the oxidation of the catechol ring and affect the Fe(III) stability constant[139,141,142]
PistillarinPenicillium bilaiiRare siderophore, one of the two findings of this compound as a natural product. Contains the unusual 3,4-dihydroxycatechol moiety, that is also found in petrobactin[129]
PyoverdinePseudomonas aeruginosa ID 4365Inhibitory of the growth of fungal plant pathogens[143]
RhizoferrinCuninghamella elegans ATCC36112Polycarboxylate siderophore[127]
SchizokinenAnabaena sp. PCC 7120-[144]
Synechobactins A–CSynechococcus sp. PCC 7002Schizokinen derivatives with amphiphilic nature, where an hydroxamic acid is replaced by a long fatty acid, these siderophores are suggested to fix into the membrane of cyanobacteria, given the high affinity, therefore preventing its loss by diffusion into marine environments[121,131]
VibrioferrinMarinobacter sp. DG870, 879, 893, and 979Stoichiometrical boron binding ability through the α-hydroxy- carboxylic acid groups. The photoproduct of this photosensitive siderophore lacks affinity for iron, hence leading to the destruction of the ligand, in contrast with other photosensitive siderophores, where the photoproduct can still coordinate and sequester Fe(III). This characteristic has been suggested to contribute for the mutualistic sharing of iron between marine bacteria and phytoplankton[107,108]
VulnibactinVibrio vulnificus (marine pathogen, causer of causing lethal septicemia or wound infections in humans)-[145]
Table
Table 3. Typical coordination structures of siderophores (adapted from [112]).
Table 3. Typical coordination structures of siderophores (adapted from [112]).
SiderophoreCoordination with Fe(III)
AmphibactinsThrough the hydroxamate groups
Aquachelins, marinobactins, ochrobactins, synechobactinsThrough the oxygen atoms of each hydroxamate group and both oxygen atoms of the β-hydroxy aspartic acid (in the aquachelins and marinobactins) or of the citric acid (in the ochrobactins and synechobactins)
Alterobactins and pseudoalterobactinsThrough the β-hydroxy aspartate moieties and a catecholate group
Petrobactin and sulfonate derivativesThrough the catecholates and the α-hydroxy acid portion of the citrate backbone

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Carvalho, C.C.C.R.; Fernandes, P. Production of Metabolites as Bacterial Responses to the Marine Environment. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 705-727. https://doi.org/10.3390/md8030705

AMA Style

De Carvalho CCCR, Fernandes P. Production of Metabolites as Bacterial Responses to the Marine Environment. Marine Drugs. 2010; 8(3):705-727. https://doi.org/10.3390/md8030705

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Carvalho, Carla C. C. R., and Pedro Fernandes. 2010. "Production of Metabolites as Bacterial Responses to the Marine Environment" Marine Drugs 8, no. 3: 705-727. https://doi.org/10.3390/md8030705

APA Style

De Carvalho, C. C. C. R., & Fernandes, P. (2010). Production of Metabolites as Bacterial Responses to the Marine Environment. Marine Drugs, 8(3), 705-727. https://doi.org/10.3390/md8030705

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop