Next Article in Journal
A Submarine Journey: The Pyrrole-Imidazole Alkaloids
Previous Article in Journal
Effects and Interactions of Medium Components on Laccase from a Marine-Derived Fungus Using Response Surface Methodology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Antinociceptive and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Caulerpin, a Bisindole Alkaloid Isolated from Seaweeds of the Genus Caulerpa

by Éverton Tenório De Souza 1, Daysianne Pereira de Lira 2, Aline Cavalcanti de Queiroz 1, Diogo José Costa da Silva 1, Anansa Bezerra de Aquino 1, Eliane A. Campessato Mella 1, Vitor Prates Lorenzo 2, George Emmanuel C. De Miranda 3, João Xavier De Araújo-Júnior 4, Maria Célia De Oliveira Chaves 2, José Maria Barbosa-Filho 2, Petrônio Filgueiras de Athayde-Filho 2, Bárbara Viviana De Oliveira Santos 2,* and Magna Suzana Alexandre-Moreira 1,*
1
LaFI-Laboratório de Farmacologia e Imunidade, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceió, AL, Brazil
2
Laboratório de Tecnologia Farmacêutica, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil
3
Laboratório de Algas Marinhas-LAM, Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil
4
Laboratório de Pesquisa em Recursos Naturais, Instituto de Química e Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceió, AL, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2009, 7(4), 689-704; https://doi.org/10.3390/md7040689
Submission received: 16 October 2009 / Revised: 4 November 2009 / Accepted: 19 November 2009 / Published: 26 November 2009

Abstract

:
The antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activity of caulerpin was investigated. This bisindole alkaloid was isolated from the lipoid extract of Caulerpa racemosa and its structure was identified by spectroscopic methods, including IR and NMR techniques. The pharmacological assays used were the writhing and the hot plate tests, the formalin-induced pain, the capsaicin-induced ear edema and the carrageenan-induced peritonitis. Caulerpin was given orally at a concentration of 100 μmol/kg. In the abdominal constriction test caulerpin showed reduction in the acetic acid-induced nociception at 0.0945 μmol (0.0103–1.0984) and for dypirone it was 0.0426 μmol (0.0092–0.1972). In the hot plate test in vivo the inhibition of nociception by caulerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) was also favorable. This result suggests that this compound exhibits a central activity, without changing the motor activity (seen in the rotarod test). Caulerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) reduced the formalin effects in both phases by 35.4% and 45.6%, respectively. The possible anti-inflammatory activity observed in the second phase in the formalin test of caulerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) was confirmed on the capsaicin-induced ear edema model, where an inhibition of 55.8% was presented. Indeed, it was also observed in the carrageenan-induced peritonitis that caulerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) exhibited anti-inflammatory activity, reducing significantly the number of recruit cells by 48.3%. Pharmacological studies are continuing in order to characterize the mechanism(s) responsible for the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory actions and also to identify other active principles present in Caulerpa racemosa.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Among the many chemical classes present in plant species, alkaloids stand out as one of major importance in the development of new drugs, because they possess a wide variety of chemical structures and have been identified as responsible for many of the pharmacological properties of medicinal plants [15]. Some plant families have the genetic capability of producing more than one alkaloid, reflected in the structural diversity of these compounds [68].
Indole compounds constitute an extensive family of chemicals found in bacteria, plants and animals. In general, these compounds are related to the metabolism of tryptophan and present substitutions in different positions of the indole ring [6,9]. Indolic compounds with significant and complex physiological roles include those related to melatonin and serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine). Indole alkaloids possess an indole ring in its structure, constituting a versatile heterocyclic discovery in 1866 [6]; this extensive group of alkaloids received more attention after the isolation of reserpine from Rauwolfia serpentina Benth., an alkaloid that changed the history of pathologies conditions as diverse as schizophrenia and hypertension. Indolic alkaloids include various plant-derived medicinal products, including the well-known anti-tumor vinblastine, vincristine, vincamin isolated from Catharanthus roseus [10] and camptothecin, is a monoterpene indole alkaloid isolated from the Chinese tree Camptotheca acuminate Decne. (Icacinaceae) which displays potent antitumour activity [11].
The knowledge about the chemical composition of marine organisms is an essential element for assessing chemotaxonomic, chemical ecology, and natural products studies, including that directed towards evaluating the pharmacological roles [1220]. Recently, we initiated a program to investigate the hypothesis that Caulerpa species produce secondary metabolites with possible antinociceptive and anti-inflamatory actions. In our preliminary investigation of the crude methanolic extract and phases from C. racemosa we had observed an antinociceptive effect in animal models. However, pharmacological and chemical studies are continuing in order to characterize the mechanism(s) responsible(s) for the antinociceptive action and also to identify other active principles present in Caulerpa racemosa [21].
The present study was conducted to characterize caulerpin (1, Figure 1), an alkaloid isolated from the lipoid extracts of Caulerpa racemosa collected in the Northeast of Brazil. Caulerpin comes from a family of bisindole natural products, and has an extra eight-member ring between the two indole rings which are incorporated directly with the carbonyl group. This alkaloid show a variety of important biological activities already described in the literature, among which it is important to mention the antitumor [22], growth regulator [23] and the plant root growth stimulant properties [24], but its in vivo antinociceptive and antiinflamatory activities weren’t reported yet. In addition, caulerpin may also be classified as a compound of low toxicity [25]. However, to date there are a few investigations supporting the pharmacological properties of this seaweed. Thus, this study was intended to evaluate the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of caulerpin from Caulerpa racemosa in animal models.

2. Results and Discussion

Three different animal models were used in this study to investigate the antinociceptive potential of caulerpin. These methods were selected to ensure both centrally and peripherally mediated effects were investigated. The acetic acid-induced abdominal constriction and the hot-plate methods analyzed peripheral and central activity, respectively, while the formalin test investigated both. In addition, the ear edema induced by capsaicin and the peritonitis induced by carrageenan in mice were used to examine the anti-inflammatory activity of this compound. The acetic acid-induced writhing is a visceral pain model and widely used for the evaluation of peripheral antinociceptive activity [26]. The intraperitoneal administration of an agent that irritates the serous membranes cause a stereotypical behavior in mice which is characterized by abdominal contractions, movements of the body as a whole, twisting of the dorsum abdominal muscles, and a reduction in the motor activity and coordination [27]. The results depicted in Figure 2 shows that caulerpin, given 40 min before, has produced an inhibition of the acetic acid-induced abdominal constrictions in mice. The IC50 calculated with 95% confidence interval) for caulerpin was 0.0945 μmol (0.0103–1.0984) (n = 10) and for dypirone it was 0.0426 μmol (0.0092–0.1972) (n = 10). The dates were expressed as % inhibition was compared to the respective acetic acid control group. The mean of contortions of the control group was 42.8 ± 1.9.
Acetic acid causes an increase in the peritoneal fluid level of prostaglandins (PGE2 and PGF2α) as well as lipooxygenase products, involving in part peritoneal receptors and inflammatory pain by inducing capillary permeability [26,28]. Collier et al. [29] postulated that acetic acid acts indirectly by inducing the release of endogenous mediators, which stimulate the nociceptive neurons. The most important transmission pathways for inflammatory pain are that comprising peripheral polymodal nociceptors sensitive to protons, such as acid sensitive ion channels and to algogen substances, such as bradykinin and cytokines. Although the writhing test has poor specificity (e.g., anticholinergic, tricyclic antidepressants and antihistaminic and other agents show activity in this test), it is a very sensitive method of screening the antinociceptive effects of compounds [2931].
In the hot plate test (Table 1), the treatment with morphine (15 μmol/kg, s.c.) caused a marked increase in the latency time of the animals at 60–150 (12.8 ± 0.4 s, 10.3 ± 0.8 s; 9.7 ± 0.7 s; 9.7 ± 0.9 s) and caulerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) caused a marked increase in the latency time of the animals at the times lecture 90–150 (4.6 ± 0.6, 3.8 ± 0.5, 4.0 ± 0.5).
The hot-plate test is commonly used to assess narcotic analgesia [32]. Although the central and peripheral analgesics respond by inhibiting the number of contractions provoked by chemical pain stimuli, only the central analgesics increase the time of response in the hot plate test [33]. These observations tend to suggest that caulerpin may possess centrally- and peripherally-mediated antinociceptive properties. The peripheral antinociceptive effect of caulerpin may be mediated via inhibition of cycloxygenases and/or lipoxygenases (and other inflammatory mediators), while its central antinociceptive action may be due its possible action as partial agonist of adrenergic, serotoninergic, cholinergic and dopaminergic receptors [34,35]. Proposed mechanisms of this effect include interation with serotoninergic receptors, because structural similarity between serotonin and caulerpin [36].
In the present study, administration of caulerpin (p.o.) did not cause motor impairment, as evaluated by forced locomotion in the rotarod test, contrary to diazepam (i.p.) that induced a decrease of the fall latency and increase the number of fall on the rotarod assay. Thus, the possibility that the antinociceptive effect of the compounds tested is due to any degree of motor impairment or sedation is improbable.
Table 2 shows the effects of caulerpin (100 μmol/kg; p.o.) and diazepam (35.1 μmol/kg, i.p.) on the rotarod test from 0.5–1 h. The compound tested did not significantly alter either the fall latency or number of falls when compared with the saline group.
The formalin test in mice confirmed an antinociceptive effect (Figures 3A and 3B). Caulerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) caused a significant inhibition of both neurogenic (28.5%) and inflammatory (55.7%) phases of formalin-induced licking. The treatment with indomethacin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) was able to inhibit the second phase by 50.3%.
The formalin test is believed to represent a more valid model for clinical pain [37]. The formalin test is a very useful method, not only for assessing antinociceptive drugs, but also helping in the elucidation of the action mechanism. The neurogenic phase is probably a direct result of stimulation in the paw and reflects centrally mediated pain with release of substance P while the late phase is due to the release of histamine, serotonin, bradikynin and prostaglandins [27]. Drugs that act primarily on the central nervous system, such as narcotics, inhibit both phases equally while peripherally acting drugs such as anti-inflammatory non-steroidal (NSAID) and anti-inflammatory steroidal only inhibit the late phase [27,33]. Caulerpin was able to block both phases of the formalin response although the effect was more pronounced in the second phase.
To investigate the anti-inflammatory activity we did the model of capsaicin-induced ear edema in mice, a well-characterized and largely used model of inflammation. Topical application of capsaicin was observed to cause a significant rise in plasma extravasations when compared to control ear in the same animal treated with a vehicle. This was significantly reduced by pretreatment with caulerpin, which had shown 55.8% of the inhibition (Figure 4).
The capsaicin-induced ear edema is a classic model used to evaluate the anti-inflammatory activities of compounds [276. Capsaicin (8-methyl-N-vanillyl-6-nonenamide), the pungent component of red peppers of the genus Capsicum, is a pharmacological tool used to evoke neurogenic acute inflammatory responses such as axon reflex vasodilatation, plasma extravasation, coughing, and painful sensitization [38,39]. The acute neurogenic inflammatory response occurs as a result of neuropeptide release from stimulated primary afferent neurons [40]. Capsacin activates a distinct subpopulation of primary sensory neurons, with somata in the dorsal root, trigeminal as well as nodose ganglia, which are known as transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1). This receptor is a non-selective cation channel expressed in nociceptive fibres that is also activated by heat, protons and some endogenous substances known to be associated with tissue inflammation, particularly lipooxygenase products [41,42].
In order to evaluate a possible inhibitory effect of caulerpin in cells recruitment into the peritoneal cavity, the carrageenan-induced peritonitis test was used (Figure 5). The positive control group showed increase in the numbers of leukocytes from peritoneal exudates and in the negative control group was not observe augment in the migration of inflammatory cells. Leukocyte cell numbers was significantly reduced up to 4 h after carrageenan injection in peritoneal exudates by indomethacin (72.1%) and caulerpin (48.3%) pretreatments, when compared to exudates from the positive control group (animal inject with carrageenan).
The carrageenan-induced peritonitis test represents a well-characterised model for studies on acute peritoneal inflammation. The action mechanism of carrageenan on peritonitis involves synergism involving prostanoids, leukotriene B4 and other chemostactic agents such as C5a and IL-8, which promote an increase of the vasodilatation, plasmatic exudation and recruitment of leukocytes, mainly neutrophils [43].
To confirm the effect of the treatment of caulerpin on recruiting cells, total and differential leukocyte counts were determined in cytospin smears (Table 3). Experimental evidence obtained in this study indicates that caulerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) decreases the neutrophil counts in relation to other leukocytes in peritoneal exudate, suggesting that it is capable of suppresses neutrophil recruitment to the inflammatory sites.
In this test, the results demonstrate that caulerpin reduced significantly the number of recruit cells, showing that this compound presents an anti-inflammatory activity in this cells recruitment model. It is well-known that reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide and PGE2 are considered as inflammatory factors, and play important roles in damage of tissues by inflammation [44]. Reactive oxygen species and proteases produced by activated polymorphonuclear neutrophils cause or exacerbate the inflammatory reactions. It has been shown previously that certain prostanoids can inhibit various functions of the neutrophils. It has been suggested that inhibition by endogenously generated prostaglandins is one of the mechanisms by which the pro-inflammatory effects of the neutrophils are limited [45].
Recently, a large number of different kinds of naturally occurring alkaloids with antinociceptive activity have been reported, such as pronuciferine, glaucine, nuciferine and pukateine [46]. Moreover, studies have shown that the alkaloid could present an important anti-inflammatory activity. These compounds can suppress antigen and mitogen-induced lymphocyte proliferation, natural-killer cell cytotoxicity, histamine release by mast cells, interleukin-1 (IL-1) secretion by human monocytes and the action of PAF on platelets [47].
Indole, the potent pharmacophoric nucleus, has been reported to possess a wide variety of biological properties as anti-inflammatory, anticonvulsant, cardiovascular, antibacterial and antifungal [47,48]. Like caulerpin, described in this article, ajmaline, annomontine, cryptolepine, evodiamine and reserpine are examples of other indole alkaloids described in the literature as active in inflammation models [47].
Caulerpin also presents structural similarity with indomethacin, an indole arylacetic acid class nonselective cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor and widely prescribed NSAID. In addition to suppressing prostaglandin formation by inhibiting COX, indomethacin is known to possess COX-independent activity such as suppression of malignant transformation of embryonic fibroblasts and activation of the proliferator-activated receptor α and γ [49]. Indomethacin is also a known phospholipase A2 inhibitor [50].
The anti-inflammatory activity of caulerpin probably involves an antioxidant effect. Serotonin was once reported as being able to protect biological tissues against radiation injury. This might indicates the capability of serotonin to interacts with or to scavenge reactive oxygen species generated by ionizing radiation and serotonin derivatives also possess great potential as natural antioxidants [51,52]. In addition, tryptophan, an indole amino acid, when exposed to oxidative stress, tryptophyl radical may be generated from tryptophan, with indole nitrogen as the active center. The sensitivity of tryptophan to oxidative stress as well as the radio protective activity of serotonin may be indicative of the importance of the indole moiety in free radical [51]. Moreover, indomethacin, a indole NSAID, is a potent scavengers of reactive oxygen species and inhibit intracellular oxidative activity and exert antioxidant effects in the liposome membrane [53].
The indole group of caulerpin probably is responsible for the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities of this alkaloid. The mechanisms of actions of antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory of this substance can involve the inhibition of COX and antioxidant activity. Moreover, its central antinociceptive action may be due its possible action as a partial agonist of adrenergic, serotoninergic, cholinergic and dopaminergic receptors. However, further studies are really needed to find out the real mechanisms of actions of this compound, and in fact it’s already currently underway to isolate and characterize other active(s) principle(s).

3. Conclusions

From the obtained results nociceptive models (the acetic acid-induced writhings and the formalin tests), it was noticed for the first time that caulerpin has showed a considerable antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities. In vivo inhibition of pain in the hot plate test by this compound was favorable, indicating that caulerpin exhibits central activity. Indeed, it was also observed in the formalin test that this substance exhibited a high anti-inflammatory activity, which was confirmed on the capsaicin-induced ear edema model and the carrageenan-induced peritonitis. However, pharmacological studies are continuing in order to characterize the mechanism(s) responsible for the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory actions.

4. Experimental

4.1. Extraction and Isolation

The green alga Caulerpa racemosa was collected in the coastal region of Bessa (7o03′52″S/34o49′51″), João Pessoa, Paraíba State, Brazil in April 2008. The specimen was identified by Dr George Emmanuel Cavalcanti de Miranda. A voucher specimen (JPB 13999) has been deposited in the Herbarium Lauro Pires Xavier of the Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Brazil.
The alga was extracted with MeOH at room temperature and the extract was partitioned between H2O and hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate and n-butanol. The chloroform fraction was subjected to separation by Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography with a 1:1 CHCl3-MeOH solvent system resulting in the isolation of an orange red pigment. Based on its UV, IR and NMR spectral data and chemical properties, it was assigned the structure of caulerpin (1).

4.2. Biological Activity Tests

Drugs and reagents

The following drugs were used in this study: acetic acid and indomethacin (Merck), arabic gum and dipyrone (Sigma Chemical), and morphine sulphate (Dimorf-Cristalia-BR). A solution of formalin 2.5 % was prepared with formaldehyde (Merck) in saline (NaCl 0.9%). The botanical material was used as suspension in arabic gum in all the experiments.

Animals

Adult male and female Swiss albino mice (20–35 g) were used in the experiments. They were housed in single-sex cages under a 12-h light:12-h dark cycle in a controlled temperature room (22 ± 2 ºC). They had free access to food and water. Groups of six animals were used in each test group and control animals received vehicle only. The experiments were performed after the approval of the protocol by the local Institutional Ethics Committee - UFAL (N º 006443/2005-78). All experiments were carried out in accordance with the current guidelines for the care of laboratory animals and the ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals [54].

The Writhing test

The methods described by Koster et al. [55] were used with a few modifications. In brief, the selected groups of animals, consisting of six mice per dose of plant compounds or drug, were used in the test. Animals were pretreated with caulerpin (100 μmol/kg, body wt., p.o.), Positive control mice groups received standard analgesics for comparison, dipyrone for 40 min prior to the i.p. injection of acetic acid 0.6% (0.25 mL). The negative control animals did not receive anything (saline) prior to the i.p. injection of acetic acid. Five minutes after the i.p. injection of acetic acid, the number of writhes exhibited by each mouse was counted for 20 min. The antinociceptive activity was expressed as the reduction on the number of abdominal writhing.

The Hot-Plate Test

The hot plate test was used to measure response latency according to the method described by Eddy and Leimbach [56], with minor modifications. In these experiments, the hot plate apparatus (Ugo Basile, Model-DS 37) was maintained at 55.5 ± 1 °C. Animals were placed on the heated surface and the time between placement and licking of the paws or jumping was recorded as latency. Latency was recorded for vehicle control groups (10 mL/kg) or pre-treated groups (100 μmol/kg, body wt., p.o.). The test compounds were administered after animal selection on time of 30 min. The selection was made on the basis of the reactivity on the test. Pre-treatment times 0 and 30 min were used for assay adaptation and selection of the animals, respectively. Only mice showing a reaction time within the range of 4–10 sec. were used in this test. The latency of the reaction to nociception was measured at time 0 and then at 30 min intervals up to the 180 min. The botanical materials were administered at 30 min and treatment latencies were recorded at the following time points: 60, 90, 120 and 150 min.

The Rotarod Test

The effect of compounds on locomotor performance was tested on the rotarod apparatus as described previously [57]. Twenty-four hours before the experiments, all animals were trained in the rotarod (3.7 cm in diameter, 16 r.p.m) until they could remain in the apparatus for 60 s without falling. On the day of the experiment, mice were treated with caulerpin (100 μmol/kg p.o) and diazepam (35.1 μmol/kg, i.p) and tested in the rotarod from 0.5–1 h after their administration. The latency to fall and the number of fall from the apparatus were recorded with a stopwatch for up to 240 s.

Formalin-Induced Pain in Mice

In brief the animals were pretreated with caulerpin 100 μmol/kg, body wt., p.o.). Positive control mice groups received standard anti-inflammatory for comparison, indomethacin for 40 min prior to the i.p. injection of formalin. The formalin test was performed according to the method of Hunskaar and Hole [58]. Briefly, 20 μL of a 2.5% (v/v) solution of formalin in saline were injected into the sub plantar region of the right hind paw and the quantification of the time that the animal spent licking the paw during the first 5 min (first phase) and from 15 to 30 min (second phase) of post-injection time was recorded. The test was performed at room temperature (22–26 ºC) and strictly actions were taken to exclude environmental disturbances (high temperature, noise and excessive movement) that might interfere with the animal’s response [59].

Capsaicin-Induced Ear Edema in Mice

The capsaicin-induced ear edema model was performed according to the method of Mantione et al. [60]. Forty minutes after injection of caulerpin and indometacin (100 μmol/kg, body wt., p.o.), 250 μg of capsaicin were applied to the inner and other surface of the right ear of the mice. The control group received vehicle only (10 mL/kg, p.o.). The left ear received acetone, delivered in the same manner. Thirty minutes after capsaicin application, the mice were killed and both ears were removed. Circular sections were taken, using a cork borer with a diameter of 6 mm, and weighed. The increase in weight caused by the irritation was measured by subtracting the weight of the untreated left ear section from that of the treated right ear sections. Ear edema was measured as the differences in weight between the treated and the untreated ear. The percent of inhibition was calculated by using (C-T)/C × 100 (%), where C and T indicate non-treated (vehicle) edema and drug-treated edema, respectively.

Carrageenan-Induced Peritonitis in Mice

For this series of experiments, the method described by Ferrándiz and Alcaraz [61] was used. Carrageenan (Sigma Aldrich) was freshly prepared (10 mg/mL) in sterile 0.9% w/v saline, and 250 μL were injected i.p., After 4 hours, the animals were killed by cervical dislocation. The peritoneal cavity was washed with 1.5 mL cold PBS, and after a gentle manual massage, the exudate was retrieved and its volume was measured. The number of recruit leukocytes to the peritoneum was counted in a Neubauer chamber and results were expressed as cells × 106/mL. The exudate was collected and used freshly for cell counts and cytospin preparations. The caulerpin (100 μmol/Kg, i.p.), the carrageenan group (arabic gum, p.o.) and the reference drug (indomethacin, 100 μmol/kg, p.o.) were administered 30 min before the carrageenan injection. In the negative control group, animals have just received the same dose of a vehicle (arabic gum, p.o.) 30 min before the saline injection by intraperitoneal route.

4.3. Statistical Analysis

The levels of significance between the experimental groups and the control were made using ANOVA in the tutorial Prisma®. The values were considered significant when * p < 0.05. The results were expressed as the average ± S.E.M of the average, as indicated in the legends in the figures. The value of ID50 (nonlinear regression analyses and confidence limits) were determined using the GraphPad Prism computer programme (GraphPad® Software Inc.).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the CAPES (BR), CNPq (BR, CNPq Edital 10/2006), MCT (BR), FAPEAL (BR), INCT-INOFAR-CNPq and the Environmental Ministry (License MMA/CGEN 18/2007) for the joint funding of this research project. The authors wish to thank several of their colleagues working at the Federal University of Alagoas and Federal University of Paraiba for their constructive criticism and assistance in carrying out this project.

References

  1. Barbosa-Filho, JM; Cunha, EVL; Gray, AI. Alkaloids of the Menispermaceae. In The Alkaloids; Cordell, GA, Ed.; Academic Press: Illinois, USA, 2000; Volume 54, pp. 1–199. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbosa-Filho, JM; Sette, IMF; Cunha, EVL; Guedes, DN; Silva, MS. Protoberberine alkaloids. In The Alkaloids; Cordell, GA, Ed.; Elsevier Inc: San Diego, CA, USA, 2005; Volume 62, pp. 1–75. [Google Scholar]
  3. Conserva, LM; Pereira, CAB; Barbosa-Filho, JM. Alkaloids of the Hernandiaceae: Occurrence and a Compilation of their Biological Activities. In The Alkaloids; Cordell, GA, Ed.; Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA, 2005; Volume 62, pp. 175–243. [Google Scholar]
  4. Falcão, HS; Leite, JA; Barbosa-Filho, JM; Athayde-Filho, PF; Chaves, MCO; Moura, MD; Ferreira, AL; Almeida, ABA; Souza-Brito, ARM; Diniz, MFFM; Batista, LM. Gastric and duodenal antiulcer activity of alkaloids: A review. Molecules 2008, 13, 3198–3223. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cunha, EVL; Barbosa-Filho, JM. Alcalóides derivados do núcleo isoquinolínico. In Química de Produtos Naturais, Novos Fármacos e a Moderna Farmacognosia, 2a ed; Yunes, RA, Cechinel-Filho, V, Eds.; Univali Editora: Itajaí-PR, Brazil, 2009; pp. 279–319. [Google Scholar]
  6. Williams, JE. Review of antiviral and immunomodulating properties of plants of the Peruvian rainforest with a particular emphasis on uña de gato and sangre de grado. Altern Med Rev 2001, 6, 567–579. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fechine, IM; Navarro, VR; Cunha, EVL; Silva, MS; Maia, JGS; Barbosa-Filho, JM. Alkaloids and volatile constituents from Duguetia flagellaris. Biochem Syst Ecol 2002, 30, 267–269. [Google Scholar]
  8. Melo, PS; Cavalcante, HMM; Barbosa-Filho, JM; Diniz, MFFM; Medeiros, IA; Haun, M. Warifteine and milonine, alkaloids isolated from Cissampelos sympodialis Eichl: cytotoxicity on rat hepatocyte culture and in V79 cells. Toxicol Lett 2003, 142, 143–151. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cano, A; Alcaraz, O; Arnao, MB. Free radical-scavenging activity of indolic compounds in aqueous and ethanolic media. Anal Bioanal Chem 2003, 376, 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  10. St-Pierre, B; Vazquez-Flota, FA; de Luca, V. Multicellular compartmentation of Catharanthus roseus alkaloid biosynthesis predicts intercellular translocation of a pathway intermediate. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 887–900. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wall, ME; Wani, M; Cook, CE; Palmer, KH; Mc Phail, AT; Sim, GA. Plant antitumor agents I. The isolation and structure elucidation of Camptothecin, a novel alkaloidal leukemia and tumor inhibitor from Camptotheca cuminata. J Am Chem Soc 1966, 88, 3888–3890. [Google Scholar]
  12. Shaari, K; Ling, KC; Rashid, ZM; Jean, TP; Abas, F; Raof, SM; Zainal, Z; Lajis, NH; Mohamad, H; Ali, AM. Cytotoxic aaptamines from Malaysian Aaptos aaptos. Mar Drugs 2009, 7, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu, WH; Hasumi, K; Peng, H; Hu, XW; Wang, XC; Bao, B. Fibrinolytic compounds isolated from a brown alga Sargassum fulvellum. Mar Drugs 2009, 7, 85–94. [Google Scholar]
  14. Genovese, G; Tedone, L; Hamann, MT; Morabito, M. The Mediterranean red alga Asparagopsis: A source of compounds against leishmania. Mar Drugs 2009, 7, 361–366. [Google Scholar]
  15. Walsh, CJ; Leggett, SR; Strohbehn, K; Pierce, RH; Sleasman, J. Effects of in vitro brevetoxin exposure on apoptosis and cellular metabolism in a leukemic T cell line (Jurkat). Mar Drugs 2008, 6, 291–307. [Google Scholar]
  16. Courtois, A; Simon-Colin, C; Boisset, C; Berthou, C; Deslandes, E; Guezennec, J; Bordron, A. Floridoside extracted from the red alga Mastocarpus stellatus is a potent activator of the classical complement pathway. Mar Drugs 2008, 6, 407–417. [Google Scholar]
  17. Baunbk, D; Trinkler, N; Ferandin, Y; Lozach, O; Ploypradith, P; Rucirawat, S; Ishibashi, F; Iwao, M; Meijer, L. Anticancer alkaloid lamellarins inhibit protein kinases. Mar Drugs 2008, 6, 514–527. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kijjoa, A; Wattanadilok, R; Campos, N; Nascimento, MSJ; Pinto, M; Herz, W. Anticancer activity evaluation of kuanoniamines A and C isolated from the marine sponge Oceanapia sagittaria, collected from the gulf of Thailand. Mar Drugs 2007, 5, 6–22. [Google Scholar]
  19. Oda, T; Wang, WF; Ukai, K; Nakazawa, T; Mochizuki, M. A sesquiterpene quinone, 5-epi-smenospongine, promotes TNF-alpha production in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. Mar Drugs 2007, 5, 151–156. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bao, B; Zhang, P; Lee, Y; Hong, J; Lee, CO; Jung, JH. Monoindole alkaloids from a marine sponge Spongosorites sp. Mar Drugs 2007, 5, 31–39. [Google Scholar]
  21. Souza, ET; Queiroz, AC; Miranda, GEC; Lorenzo, VP; Silva, EF; Freire-Dias, TLM; Cupertino-Silva, YK; Melo, GMA; Santos, BVO; Chaves, MCO; Alexandre-Moreira, MS. Antinociceptive activities of crude methanolic extract and phases, n-butanolic, chloroformic and ethyl acetate from Caulerpa racemosa (Caulerpaceae). Braz J Pharmacogn 2009, 19, 115–120. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ayyad, SEN; Badria, FA. Caulerpin, an antitumor índole alkaloid from Caulerpa racemosa, Alex. J Pharm Sci 1994, 8, 217. [Google Scholar]
  23. Xu, XH; Su, JG. The separation, identification and bioassay of caulerpin. Zhongshan Daxue Xuebao Ziran Kexueban 1996, 35, 64–66. [Google Scholar]
  24. Raub, MF; Cardellina, JH, II; Schwede, JG. The green algal pigment caulerpin as a plant growth regulator. Phytochemistry 1987, 26, 619–620. [Google Scholar]
  25. Vidal, JP; Laurent, D; Kabore, A; Rechencg, E; Boucard, M; Girard, JP; Escale, R; Rossi, JC. Caulerpin, caulerpicin, Caulerpa scalpelliformis: comparative acute toxicity study. Bot Mar 1984, 27, 533–537. [Google Scholar]
  26. Du, J; Yu, Y; Ke, Y; Wang, C; Zhu, L; Qian, ZM. Ligustilide attenuates pain behavior induced by acetic acid or formalin. J Ethnopharmacol 2007, 112, 211–214. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zeashana, H; Amresha, G; Raoa, CV; Singhb, S. Antinociceptive activity of Amaranthus spinosus in experimental animals. J Ethnopharmacol 2009, 122, 492–496. [Google Scholar]
  28. Choi, EM. Antinociceptive and antiinflammatory activities of pine (Pinus densiflora) pollen extract. Phytother Res 2007, 21, 471–475. [Google Scholar]
  29. Collier, HOJ; Dinneen, JC; Johnson, CA; Schneider, C. The abdominal constriction response and its suppression by analgesic drugs in the mouse. Brit J Pharm Chemoth 1968, 32, 295–310. [Google Scholar]
  30. Alexandre-Moreira, MS; Piuvezam, MR; Araújo, CC; Thomas, G. Studies on the anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity of Curatella americana L. J Ethnopharmacol 1999, 67, 171–177. [Google Scholar]
  31. Miranda, FGG; Vilar, JC; Alves, IAN; Cavalcanti, SCH; Antoniolli, AR. Antinociceptive and antiedematogenic properties and acute toxicity of Tabebuia avellanedae Lor. ex Griseb. inner bark aqueous extract. BMC Pharmacol 2001, 1, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  32. Moñoa, J; Moscatelli, V; Hnatyszyn, O; Gorzalczany, S; Acevedo, C; Ferraro, G. Antinociceptive and antiinflammatory activities of Artemisia copa extracts. Pharmacol Res 2004, 50, 59–63. [Google Scholar]
  33. García, MD; Fernández, MA; Alvarez, A; Saenz, MT. Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effect of the aqueous extract from leaves of Pimenta racemosa var. ozua (Mirtaceae). J Ethnopharmacol 2004, 91, 69–73. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ojewole, JAO. Antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory and antidiabetic properties of Hypoxis hemerocallidea Fisch. & C.A. Mey. (Hypoxidaceae) corm [‘African Potato’] aqueous extract in mice and rats. J Ethnopharmacol 2006, 103, 126–134. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ballou, L; Botting, RM; Goorha, S; Zhang, J; Vane, JR. Nociception in cyclooxygenase isozyme-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97, 10272–10276. [Google Scholar]
  36. Clunie, M; Crone, LA; Klassen, L; Yip, R. Psychiatric side effects of indomethacin in parturients. Can J Anesth 2003, 50, 586–588. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tjølsen, A; Berger, OG; Hunskaar, S; Rosland, JH; Hole, K. The formalin test: evaluation of the method. Pain 1992, 51, 5–17. [Google Scholar]
  38. Inoue, H; Nagata, N; Koshihara, Y. Profile of capsaicin-induced mouse ear oedema as neurogenic inflammatory model: comparison with arachidonic acid-induced ear oedema. Brit J Pharmacol 1993, 110, 1614–1620. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tang, MLY; Haas, DA; Hu, JW. Capsaicin-induced joint inflammation is not blocked by local anesthesia. Anesth Prog 2004, 51, 2–9. [Google Scholar]
  40. Grant, AD; Gerard, NP; Brain, SD. Evidence of a role for NK1 and CGRP receptors in mediating neurogenic vasodilatation in the mouse ear. Brit J Pharmacol 2002, 135, 356–362. [Google Scholar]
  41. Szallasia, A; Blumbergb, PM. Vanilloid receptors: New insights enhance potential as a therapeutic. Pain 1996, 68, 195–208. [Google Scholar]
  42. Chizh, BA; Aylott, MC; Bullman, JN; Gray, EJ; Lai, RY; Williams, PM; Appleby, JM. The effects of the TRPV1 antagonist SB-705498 on TRPV1 receptormediated activity and inflammatory hyperalgesia in humans. Pain 2007, 132, 132–141. [Google Scholar]
  43. Foster, SJ; McCormick, ME; Howarth, A; Aked, D. Leukocyte recruitment in the subcutaneous sponge implant model of acute inflammation in the rat is not mediated by leukotriene B4. Biochem Pharmacol 1986, 35, 1709–1717. [Google Scholar]
  44. Yong-Fang, HU; Yong-Jie, WU. Effect of recombinant human basic fibroblast growth factor on acute inflammation in mice and rats. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2001, 22, 357–379. [Google Scholar]
  45. Oktar, BK; Yuksel, M; Alican, I. The role of cyclooxygenase inhibition in the effect of a-melanocyte-stimulating hormone on reactive oxygen species production by rat peritoneal neutrophils. Prostag Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 2004, 71, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  46. Calixto, JB; Beirith, A; Ferreira, J; Santos, ARS; Cechinel-Filho, V; Yunes, RA. Naturally occurring antinociceptive substances from plants. Phytother Res 2000, 14, 401–418. [Google Scholar]
  47. Radwan, MAA; Ragab, EA; Sabry, NM; El-Shenawy, SM. Synthesis and biological evaluation of new 3-substituted indole derivatives as potential anti-inflammatory and analgesic agents. Biol Med Chem 2007, 15, 3832–3841. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bhati, SK; Kumar, A. Synthesis of new substituted azetidinoyl and thiazolidinoyl-1,3,4-thiadiazino (6,5-b) indoles as promising anti-inflammatory agents. Eur J Med Chem 2008, 43, 2323–2330. [Google Scholar]
  49. Hata, AN; Lybrand, TP; Marnett, LJ; Breyer, RM. Structural determinants of arylacetic acid nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs necessary for binding and activation of the prostaglandin D2 receptor CRTH2. Mol Pharmacol 2005, 67, 640–647. [Google Scholar]
  50. Touhey, S; O’Connor, R; Plunkett, S; Maguire, A; Clynes, M. Structure-activity relationship of indomethacin analogues for MRP-1, COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition: identification of novel chemotherapeutic drug resistance modulators. Eur J Cancer 2002, 38, 1661–1670. [Google Scholar]
  51. Stole, S. Indole derivatives as neuroprotectants. Life Sci 1999, 65, 1943–1950. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kang, K; Park, S; Kim, YS; Lee, LS; Back, K. Biosynthesis and biotechnological production of serotonin derivatives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2009, 83, 27–34. [Google Scholar]
  53. Maffei-Facino, R; Carini, M; Aldini, G; Saibene, L; Macciocchi, A. Antioxidant profile of nimesulide, indomethacin and diclofenac in phosphatidylcholine liposomes (PCL) as membrane model. Int J Tissue React 1993, 15, 225–234. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zimmermann, M. Ethical guidelines for investigation of experimental pain in conscious animals. Pain 1983, 16, 109–110. [Google Scholar]
  55. Koster, R; Anderson, M; De-Beer, EJ. Acetic acid analgesic screen. Fed Proc 1959, 18, 418–420. [Google Scholar]
  56. Eddy, NB; Leimbach, D. Synthetic analgesics. II. Dithienylbutenyland dithienylbutylamines. JPET 1953, 107, 385–393. [Google Scholar]
  57. Godoy, MCM; Figueira, MR; Flores, AE; Rubin, MA; Oliveira, MR; Zanatta, N; Martins, MAP; Bonacorso, HG; Mello, CF. α2-Adrenoceptors and 5-HT receptors mediate the antinociceptive effect of new pyrazoles, but not of dipyrone. Eur J Pharmacol 2004, 496, 93–97. [Google Scholar]
  58. Hunskaar, S; Hole, K. The formalin test in mice: dissociation between inflammatory and non-inflammatory pain. Pain 1987, 30, 103–114. [Google Scholar]
  59. Tjolsen, A; Hole, K. 1997; Animal models of analgesia. In The Pharmacology of Pain; Dickenson, A, Besson, J, Eds.; Springer Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1997; Volume 130, pp. 1–20.
  60. Mantione, CR; Rodrigues, RA. Bradykinin (BK)1-receptor antagonist blocks capsaicin-induced ear inflammation in mice. Brit J Pharmacol 1990, 99, 516–518. [Google Scholar]
  61. Ferrándiz, ML; Alcaraz, MJ. Antiinflammatory activity and inhibition of arachidonic acidmetabolism by flavonoids. Inflamm Res 1991, 32, 283–288. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Structure of caulerpin (1).
Figure 1. Structure of caulerpin (1).
Marinedrugs 07 00689f1
Figure 2. The antinociceptive effect of caulerpin. Dose–response curves of the caulerpin and dypirone (100, 10, 1, 0.1 and 0.01 μmol/kg, p.o.) on the acetic acid-induced writhing model in mice. Each column represents the mean of six animals. Data are expressed as percentage of inhibition of number writhings.
Figure 2. The antinociceptive effect of caulerpin. Dose–response curves of the caulerpin and dypirone (100, 10, 1, 0.1 and 0.01 μmol/kg, p.o.) on the acetic acid-induced writhing model in mice. Each column represents the mean of six animals. Data are expressed as percentage of inhibition of number writhings.
Marinedrugs 07 00689f2
Figure 3. The antinociceptive effect of caulerpin on the formalin test. Caulerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) and indomethacin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.), were assayed in the early-phase (0–5 min, panel A) or late-phase (15–30 min, panel B) of the formalin-induced nociception in mice. Each point represents the mean ± S.E.M. of six animals. Statistical differences between the treated and the control groups were evaluated by ANOVA and Dunnett tests and the asterisks denote the significance levels in comparison with control groups, *P < 0.05,**P < 0.01.
Figure 3. The antinociceptive effect of caulerpin on the formalin test. Caulerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) and indomethacin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.), were assayed in the early-phase (0–5 min, panel A) or late-phase (15–30 min, panel B) of the formalin-induced nociception in mice. Each point represents the mean ± S.E.M. of six animals. Statistical differences between the treated and the control groups were evaluated by ANOVA and Dunnett tests and the asterisks denote the significance levels in comparison with control groups, *P < 0.05,**P < 0.01.
Marinedrugs 07 00689f3
Figure 4. The anti-inflammatory effect of caulerpin. Caulerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) and indomethacin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) were evaluated on the capsaicin-induced ear edema model. Each column represents the mean ± SEM of five animals. The asterisks denote the significance levels in comparison with control groups, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Figure 4. The anti-inflammatory effect of caulerpin. Caulerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) and indomethacin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) were evaluated on the capsaicin-induced ear edema model. Each column represents the mean ± SEM of five animals. The asterisks denote the significance levels in comparison with control groups, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Marinedrugs 07 00689f4
Figure 5. The effect of caulerpin on cell migration. Culerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) and indomethacin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) were evaluated by the carrageenan-induced peritoneal inflammation test. Each point represents the mean ± S.E.M. of six animals. Statistical differences between the treated and the control groups were evaluated by ANOVA and Dunnett tests and the asterisks denote the significance levels in comparison with control groups, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Figure 5. The effect of caulerpin on cell migration. Culerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) and indomethacin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) were evaluated by the carrageenan-induced peritoneal inflammation test. Each point represents the mean ± S.E.M. of six animals. Statistical differences between the treated and the control groups were evaluated by ANOVA and Dunnett tests and the asterisks denote the significance levels in comparison with control groups, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Marinedrugs 07 00689f5
Table 1. Time-course of caulerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) and morphine (15 μmol/kg, s.c.) on thermal nociception (hot plate).
Table 1. Time-course of caulerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) and morphine (15 μmol/kg, s.c.) on thermal nociception (hot plate).
Animal GroupDose (μmol/kg)Pretreatmenta
Post-treatment (min)a
0 min30 min60 min90 min120 min150 min

Control---1.4 ± 0.32.2 ± 0.61.8± 0.23.2 ± 0.32.8 ± 0.32.6 ± 0.5
Morphine156.9 ± 0.45.9 ± 0.312.8 ± 0.4**10.3 ± 0.8**9.7 ± 0.7**9.7 ± 0.9**
Caulerpin1001.9 ± 0.22.3 ± 0.63.3 ± 0.54.6 ± 0.6**3.8 ± 0.5*4.0 ± 0.5*
aresults represents the mean ± s.e.m. of six animals.
*P < 0.05.
**P < 0.01.
*p < 0.05 (ANOVA and Dunnett tests were used to evaluate the significance levels in comparison with zero-time).
Table 2. Effect of caulerpin (p.o.) and diazepam (i.p.) administration on the latency for the fifth fall and the number of falls from the rotarod test.
Table 2. Effect of caulerpin (p.o.) and diazepam (i.p.) administration on the latency for the fifth fall and the number of falls from the rotarod test.
Treatment (μmol/kg)Fall latency (s)
Number of falls (s)
0.5 h1 h0.5 h1 h

Saline198.0 ± 28.1221.0 ± 19.00.4 ± 0.30.2 ± 0.2
Caulerpin182.3 ± 37.3240.0 ± 00.9 ± 0.40 ± 0
Diazepan2.7 ± 0.6**109.9 ± 36.7**9.2 ± 2.2**3.9 ± 1.4**
Each value represents the mean ± S.E.M. of the 10 animals in each group.
**p < 0.01 as compared to both control groups. One way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keubs as the post hoc test.
Table 3. Profile of cellular recruitment of the treatments with caulerpin. Caulerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) and indomethacin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) were used in the carrageenan-induced (2.5 mg/animal) peritoneal inflammation test. The cell number were determinated by optical microscopic.
Table 3. Profile of cellular recruitment of the treatments with caulerpin. Caulerpin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) and indomethacin (100 μmol/kg, p.o.) were used in the carrageenan-induced (2.5 mg/animal) peritoneal inflammation test. The cell number were determinated by optical microscopic.
TreatmentPercentage of cells (%)
PolymorphonuclearLymphocyteMonocyteBasophil

Saline15.580.0*1.53.0
Carrageenan34.544.020.51.0
Indomethacin + Carrageenan7.0*68.0*21.04.0
Caulerpin + Carrageenan6.0*63.0*31.0*0.0
Each point represents the % of inhibition of the cell number versus positive control (carrageenan) of six animals. Statistical differences between the treated and the control groups were evaluated by ANOVA and Dunnett tests and the asterisks denote the significance levels in comparison with control groups,
*P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Souza, É.T.; Pereira de Lira, D.; Cavalcanti de Queiroz, A.; Costa da Silva, D.J.; Bezerra de Aquino, A.; Campessato Mella, E.A.; Prates Lorenzo, V.; De Miranda, G.E.C.; De Araújo-Júnior, J.X.; De Oliveira Chaves, M.C.; et al. The Antinociceptive and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Caulerpin, a Bisindole Alkaloid Isolated from Seaweeds of the Genus Caulerpa. Mar. Drugs 2009, 7, 689-704. https://doi.org/10.3390/md7040689

AMA Style

De Souza ÉT, Pereira de Lira D, Cavalcanti de Queiroz A, Costa da Silva DJ, Bezerra de Aquino A, Campessato Mella EA, Prates Lorenzo V, De Miranda GEC, De Araújo-Júnior JX, De Oliveira Chaves MC, et al. The Antinociceptive and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Caulerpin, a Bisindole Alkaloid Isolated from Seaweeds of the Genus Caulerpa. Marine Drugs. 2009; 7(4):689-704. https://doi.org/10.3390/md7040689

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Souza, Éverton Tenório, Daysianne Pereira de Lira, Aline Cavalcanti de Queiroz, Diogo José Costa da Silva, Anansa Bezerra de Aquino, Eliane A. Campessato Mella, Vitor Prates Lorenzo, George Emmanuel C. De Miranda, João Xavier De Araújo-Júnior, Maria Célia De Oliveira Chaves, and et al. 2009. "The Antinociceptive and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Caulerpin, a Bisindole Alkaloid Isolated from Seaweeds of the Genus Caulerpa" Marine Drugs 7, no. 4: 689-704. https://doi.org/10.3390/md7040689

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop