Previous Article in Journal
Neoxanthin: A Promising Medicinal and Nutritional Carotenoid
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 23
Issue 8
10.3390/md23080318
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Marine-Derived Collagen and Chitosan: Perspectives on Applications Using the Lens of UN SDGs and Blue Bioeconomy Strategies

by
Mariana Almeida
* and
Helena Vieira
*
CESAM—Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Environment and Planning, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2025, 23(8), 318; https://doi.org/10.3390/md23080318 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 July 2025 / Revised: 28 July 2025 / Accepted: 30 July 2025 / Published: 1 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Innovative Biotechnology Processes for Marine By-Products: From Waste Stream to Value Stream)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Marine biomass, particularly from waste streams, by-products, underutilized, invasive, or potential cultivable marine species, offers a sustainable source of high-value biopolymers such as collagen and chitin. These macromolecules have gained significant attention due to their biocompatibility, biodegradability, functional versatility, and broad applicability across health, food, wellness, and environmental fields. This review highlights recent advances in the uses of marine-derived collagen and chitin/chitosan. In alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), we analyze how these applications contribute to sustainability, particularly in SDGs related to responsible consumption and production, good health and well-being, and life below water. Furthermore, we contextualize the advancement of product development using marine collagen and chitin/chitosan within the European Union’s Blue bioeconomy strategies, highlighting trends in scientific research and technological innovation through bibliometric and patent data. Finally, the review addresses challenges facing the development of robust value chains for these marine biopolymers, including collaboration, regulatory hurdles, supply-chain constraints, policy and financial support, education and training, and the need for integrated marine resource management. The paper concludes with recommendations for fostering innovation and sustainability in the valorization of these marine resources.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Both collagen and chitin of marine origin are biodegradable and biocompatible, with a range of properties that make them suitable in several areas such as biomedical, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, agriculture, and environmental [1], and as alternatives to synthetic polymers [2,3]. Chitin has particular utility in biomedical, environmental, and agricultural fields [3] while collagen, as the primary fibrous protein in the extracellular matrix and connective tissues of animals, plays a crucial role in the development of biomedical products [4]. Several of these uses overlap, while co-application in biomedical hybrid materials has demonstrated synergistic effects, including improved mechanical performance [5] and biological activity [6].
Growing interest for sustainable products and solutions is increasing attention on marine-derived materials like collagen and chitin/chitosan. This trend potential underscores a significant market potential; for example, some reports mention that the chitin, chitosan, and derivatives market was valued at USD 4.01 Billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 12.12 Billion by 2032; the marine collagen market is projected to grow from USD 20.49 billion in 2025 to USD 35.43 billion by 2035 [7,8].
In the case of collagen, the global market is particularly driven by the rising awareness of its health benefits, especially among the aging population—for example, its use in supplements aimed at improving skin health and joint function [9]. In agriculture, chitin-based materials are gaining increasing attention for sustainable crop production, serving as natural biopesticides and plant growth enhancers [10].
Blue bioeconomy is an emergent subsector of Blue Economy, encompassing several industries exploring and focusing on biobased products and processes. Blue Economy itself is a wider concept that denotes the use of ocean resources for economic growth, social well-being, and environmental health. In this subsector, biotechnological and biomanufacturing innovations based on marine organisms, such as microorganisms, algae, and invertebrates, can create novel pathways for the commercial exploitation of marine biomass [11,12]. Among these, biopolymers such as collagen and chitin derived from fish and invertebrates exhibit properties that position them as resources relevant in the transition toward a circular and bioeconomy [13,14].
The circular-economy concept, on the other hand, promotes the minimization of material input, waste, emissions, and energy use during the lifecycle of products, while bioeconomy helps reduce the reliance on nonrenewable and unsustainable resources and bear potential for regional economic development [15]. The two concepts coupled together are paramount to several strategic development plans across the globe, and in Europe in particular, such as the Circular Bioeconomy Joint Union partnership, the Biotech and Biomanufacturing Initiative, the upcoming Bioeconomy Strategy 2025, or the Green deal and Fit for 55 strategies, to name a few. Sustainability (and autonomy) is the overarching goal—ensuring that this economic development fosters social and environmental sustained sustainability [16].
To fully harness the potential of marine-derived polymers towards practical applications, a robust innovation pipeline needs to be established. However, while scientific research on both topics is strong, the innovation pipeline remains fragmented and underdeveloped [17].
This review aims to provide an overview of marine-derived collagen and chitin/chitosan, covering their sources, extraction, applications, innovation trends, and policy challenges in the context of the UN SDGs and Blue bioeconomy frameworks, highlighting how these contexts can shape their development and applications. First, it will summarize current research trends. It will then contextualize these developments within the framework of sustainable development, particularly the UN2030 Agenda and its 17 SGDs and relevant European Union policies, mapping both direct and indirect initiatives linked to marine biomass valorization. Finally, the review will examine the main bottlenecks hindering the growth of marine collagen and chitin/chitosan value chains in the EU and will propose areas that require further work to enable their sustainable development.

2. An Overview of Marine-Derived Collagen and Chitin/Chitosan: Sources and Properties

Marine-derived polymers such as collagen and chitin/chitosan differ in their biochemical composition and structural characteristics, which in turn influence their functional and application profiles across various fields. Table 1 outlines key sources of marine collagen and chitin/chitosan, highlighting their distinct properties and potential uses.
Collagen accounts for about 30% of total protein in the human body, and it has a unique triple-helical structure made of three α polypeptide chains, coiled around each other. The α chain’s primary structure consists of repeating Gly-Xaa-Yaa triplets, typically glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline [18] (Figure 1A,B).
Collagen has seen growing interest in its marine-derived form as an alternative to collagen obtained from terrestrial animals [19]. It is commonly derived from fish skins and scales, jellyfish, and sea cucumbers [20,21]. Collagen from fish presents similarities with Type I collagen, the most abundant and bioavailable form in the human body, while collagen from marine invertebrates is more diverse and often exhibits unique structural features, such as variations in amino-acid composition and fibril organization [20,21].
Marinedrugs 23 00318 g001
Figure 1. Structure of collagen, chitin, and chitosan. (A) Primary amino-acid sequence of Type I collagen, illustrating the repeating Gly-X-Y, where X and Y are often Pro and Hyp, respectively (modified from [22], under CC BY 4.0.); (B) three-dimensional model of collagen, illustrating the triple helix (generated with RCSB PDB (rcsb.org)); (C,D) chemical structures of chitin and chitosan, respectively (modified from [23], under CC BY 4.0.).
Figure 1. Structure of collagen, chitin, and chitosan. (A) Primary amino-acid sequence of Type I collagen, illustrating the repeating Gly-X-Y, where X and Y are often Pro and Hyp, respectively (modified from [22], under CC BY 4.0.); (B) three-dimensional model of collagen, illustrating the triple helix (generated with RCSB PDB (rcsb.org)); (C,D) chemical structures of chitin and chitosan, respectively (modified from [23], under CC BY 4.0.).
Marinedrugs 23 00318 g001
Chitin and its deacetylated derivative, chitosan, are a family of linear polysaccharides composed of varying amounts of (β1→4) linked residues of N-acetyl-2 amino-2-deoxy-D-glucose (glucosamine, GlcN) and 2-amino-2-deoxy-D-glucose (N-acetyl-glucosamine, GlcNAc) residues [24]. It is found in the skeletons of crustaceans and molluscs, and is often processed into chitosan to improve its solubility [24]. The presence of N-acetyl amino groups in chitin facilitates diverse chemical modifications, enabling the development of materials with tailored functionalities [25] (Figure 1C,D).
In recent years, significant scientific advances have propelled the research of marine-derived collagen and chitin/chitosan [17,21,24,26]. Traditionally, isolation methods have relied on conventional chemical-intensive based methods; however, growing environmental concerns have prompted a shift toward more sustainable approaches. Other techniques—such as enzymatic hydrolysis, bacterial fermentation or organic acid-mediated extraction (e.g., citric or lactic acid), supercritical carbon dioxide, or the use of green solvents, such as Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) and ionic liquids (ILs) as alternatives to stronger acids, and energy efficient methods such as microwave assisted extraction, autoclave treatment, ultrasonic-assisted extraction, applied for both collagen and/or chitin, improving yield and reducing solvent/energy use—have demonstrated promising potential in reducing chemical waste and minimizing environmental impact [27,28,29,30,31,32].
Research on marine-derived collagen and chitin/chitosan is primarily driven by biomedical, therapeutic, and pharmaceutical applications, with a high number of studies focused on isolation, characterization, and bioactivities [17]. Beyond the biomedical field, there is growing diversification of the food and nutraceutical sectors for both biopolymers [17,26]. Collagen is also being explored in cosmetic applications, while for chitin/chitosan, there is also a relevant number of publications addressing its use in wastewater treatment, feed, and agricultural applications [17].
Marine-origin collagen has garnered particular interest in the health arena, owing to its biocompatibility with human tissues, lower immunogenicity compared to terrestrial sources, and favorable scaffold-forming properties. The triple helical structure of marine collagen supports superior scaffold formation, facilitating cellular adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation—critical features for tissue engineering and wound healing [33,34]. Marine collagen hydrolysates and bioactive peptides have also demonstrated high bioactivity profile, such as antioxidant, antimicrobial, antihypertensive, and anti-inflammatory properties, making it highly promising for nutraceutical and pharmaceutical applications [35]. For instance, marine collagen-derived peptides can act as effective natural antioxidants, supporting skin health and protecting against oxidative stress [36]. In addition, its high adsorption capacity, moisturizing properties, and ability to improve skin elasticity make collagen a highly valuable ingredient in cosmetics [36,37].
For chitosan, the primary areas of scientific interest are similar to those of marine collagen, focusing on biomedical, pharmaceutical, and food-related applications. In cosmetics, chitosan nanoparticles act as a delivery system for active substances to the skin, enhancing the delivery and stability of active ingredients in cosmetic formulations [38,39].
Additionally, emerging research areas include environmental applications such as water treatment, as well as more diversified fields like agriculture and feed [17].
Key properties of chitin, chitosan, and its derivatives also include biological activities including antitumoral, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities, which could be used as therapeutic polymers [40]. Chitosan’s antimicrobial and antioxidant activities and film-forming properties further enhance its utility in food preservation [40].
Due to their biocompatibility, biodegradability, low toxicity and non-immunogenicity, they are highly valuable in tissue regeneration, such as wound healing [25,41].
Beyond health-related uses, chitosan’s chelating capacity allows it to bind heavy metals and dyes, making it a potential biodegradable coagulant/flocculant in wastewater treatment [42]. In agriculture, chitosan acts as a natural biostimulant and biopesticide, promoting plant growth and enhancing resistance to pathogens. It is also increasingly used in animal feed for its immunomodulatory and growth-promoting effects [42]. Nanotechnology-derived chitosan and derivatives also promise highly sophisticated biomedical and environmental applications such as biobased electric devices [43] and tumor-targeting drug-delivery systems [41].
The intellectual property landscape reflects the focus on enhancing extraction efficiency and developing sustainable practices and applications in health and food areas, which dominate patent filings, while environmental applications like water treatment are underrepresented in patents. The emphasis on extraction methods and their uses reflects ongoing innovation and technological progress. However, this also reveals a gap between scientific advancements and their commercial application, suggesting untapped potential in areas like environmental sustainability [17].

3. UN SDG Lens Applied to Marine-Derived Biopolymers

3.1. Marine-Derived Collagen and Chitin Sustainable Uses

The use of marine-derived collagen and chitin/chitosan aligns closely with the United Nations SDGs [44], as these biopolymers offer sustainable, biodegradable alternatives to synthetic materials while promoting responsible resource use. Overall, the adoption of marine-derived biopolymers plays a significant role in promoting sustainable development across ecological, economic, and social dimensions, contributing, directly or indirectly, to numerous goals and supporting a broad range of sustainability targets [44] (Figure 2, Table 2 and Table 3).

3.1.1. Uses in Health, Agriculture, and Industry

The processing of these polymers is well aligned with SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being). Marine-derived collagen and chitosan exhibit bioactive properties such as antimicrobial, anti-viral, antioxidant, wound healing, and tissue-regeneration effects, making them valuable in biomedical applications (e.g., wound dressings, scaffolds, drug-delivery systems) [46,47,48,49], and nutraceutical supplements [22,48,50] and therefore also addresses the ambition of Target 2.2 (addressing global nutrition gaps) [44]. Moreover, the marine collagen tissue-engineered vascular grafts and the hypolipidemic and anti-obesity effects of collagen peptides can contribute to Target 3.4 in the reduction of premature mortality from non-communicable diseases by improving treatment outcomes [51,52,53]. Furthermore, the mucoadhesive properties of chitosan make this polymer a vehicle for mucosal vaccine delivery against infectious diseases [54] and therefore contribute to Target 3.8 by offering alternatives for essential medicines and vaccines.
Beyond biomedical uses, marine chitin and chitosan have garnered attention for their effects in agriculture, including as biopesticides, plant-growth promoters, and soil-health enhancers [17]. Their ability to act on plant pathogens and as stimulants of plant growth [10,55] make them an alternative to synthetic agrochemicals. This expands their relevance to SDG 2 (food security, improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture), particularly Target 2.4 [44], by contributing to sustainable food production systems and enhancing the resilience of agricultural practices. Additionally, their role in reducing chemical-pesticide dependency supports SDG 15 (Life on Land) by minimizing terrestrial ecosystem degradation and negative effects on biodiversity (Target 15.1) [44]. The use of chitosan adsorbent properties in water-purification technologies links to SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), particularly Target 6.3 [44], by facilitating pollutant removal and water-quality improvement [56].
Ongoing advances in extraction technologies, processing, and technological development continue to expand the potential of marine collagen [22,28,57] and chitin/chitosan [58,59] and therefore align with SDG-9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), Target 9.5, by enhancing scientific research and technological innovation.

3.1.2. Sustainability and Circular Economy

The concepts of sustainability and the circular economy aim to conserve natural resources, reduce waste, promote cleaner and more efficient production methods, and support long-term environmental health by maximizing the value derived from materials throughout their lifecycle [16]. Within this framework, the valorization of marine biomass, such as collagen and chitosan derived from fish processing by-products and crustacean shells, offers a sustainable alternative to the direct extraction of primary marine resources and therefore directly supports SDG 14 (Life below Water), by prioritizing the valorization of this biomass over direct extraction from primary marine resources [26], reducing environmental pressures such as overexploitation and pollution. It also aligns with actions to increase scientific knowledge, develop research capacity, and transfer marine technology to improve ocean health [17], aligning in particular with Target 14.a. The development of biodegradable chitosan-based materials can also mitigate plastic pollution, contributing to Target 14.1 (prevent and significantly reduce marine pollution of all kinds) [60].
Furthermore, the use of collagen and chitosan from marine by-products promotes sustainable resource utilization and waste minimization, directly supporting SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) and in particular Target 12.2 (achieve the efficient use of natural resources), 12.3 (halving per capita global food waste and reducing food losses along production and supply chains) and Target 12.5 (substantially reducing waste generation through prevention, reduction, recycling, and reuse) [61]. It is also aligned with Target 14.2 (sustainably manage and protect marine and coastal ecosystems), by supporting circular- and bioeconomy approaches that promote the sustainable management of ocean resources [62].
These initiatives also align with SDG 4 (quality education), through the promotion of lifelong learning opportunities through capacity building, skills development (Target 4.4) [44], specifically tailored to the blue economy sector [63] and in the promotion of education for sustainable development (Target 4.7), equipping individuals with the knowledge and skills needed to support sustainability goals.
In a broader context, the valorization of these marine biopolymers contributes to SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), by creating new value chains and new jobs, and stimulating entrepreneurship, supporting Targets 8.2 (improve economic productivity through diversification and innovation), 8.3 (promote policies for jobs, entrepreneurship and innovation), and 8.4 (improve resource efficiency in consumption and production). In particular, the ten Ocean Decade Challenges are part of the United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021–2030) and articulate the most immediate priorities for the Ocean Decade. Challenge 4 calls for the creation of a sustainable and equitable ocean economy, emphasizing the importance of fostering economic inclusion, particularly in coastal communities [64]. In this context, the use of these polymers supports socio-economic development by creating value chains and developing industries around these products: coastal communities can create new jobs, stimulate entrepreneurship, integrate scientific innovation with local resource management, and diversify the local economy beyond traditional sectors like fisheries or tourism [17].
In addition, integrating gender equality into this development aligns with Target 5.5 [44] by promoting women’s full and effective participation, as well as equal opportunities for leadership [65].

3.2. The EU Blue Bioeconomy and Challenges and Opportunities for Marine-Derived Biopolymers

Recent advances in the Blue bioeconomy underscore the strategic importance of marine-derived biotechnological innovations for achieving sustainability and circularity goals [11,12]. EU policy initiatives—such as the upcoming revision of the EU Bioeconomy 2025 Strategy, the EU Ocean Pact [66] the European Green Deal, the Circular Bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking, and the Circular Economy Action Plan—provide a policy and funding landscape that emphasizes the role of the ocean and its resources to the Union and a vision of a sustainable path needed to foster a new economic paradigm anchored in sustainable models, including waste reduction, resource efficiency, circularity, and the sustainable use of biological resources. At more local and regional level, national initiatives, such as the Nature Restoration Law national directives implementation, or even national dedicated ocean or bioeconomy strategies, may influence or shape the development of the markets and technologies related to these marine polymers.
On the other hand, recent market forecast projections for these marine-derived polymers are estimating a doubling or tripling market-value opportunity [11,12] and, despite the enormous development opportunities these projections may bring, they also entail concrete sustainability and value-chain management challenges that it is important to tackle.
Pakseresht et al. [12] identified four core innovation clusters in the Blue biotechnology innovation arena (bioenergy, feedstock, and fertilizers, biomass for food, and industrial applications), each representing different resource applications, technological developments, and potential business models that can extend beyond economic value to address environmental and social values (Figure 3). This categorization was achieved through a comprehensive scoping review of the global scientific literature, analysing emerging trends and technologies, especially in the context of business and management.
The cluster on the production of feed and fertilizers focuses on transforming marine waste, such as fishery and shellfish discards and processed by-products, into valuable inputs like animal feed, fish protein hydrolysates for animal nutrition, or agrochemicals fertilizers. Activities in the biomass for food cluster utilize marine organisms such as marine waste, algae, and invertebrates from mariculture to produce food products, nutraceuticals, and functional ingredients. The industrial applications cluster encompasses the development of bioplastics, biomaterials, and environmentally friendly materials derived from marine biomass such as algae, microorganisms, and marine waste into a wide variety of products with applications in a vast number of industries, from furniture and bioconstruction, to beverages, water treatment, or even household products.
In the last decade, marine invertebrates have been increasingly investigated as potential sources of novel biomaterials, although issues related to sustainability and circularity need further research [21]. In an era where biomass sourcing and sustainability is a paramount concern for each nation, in particular in the EU, fostering marine by-products or marine-related industries’ waste streams’ innovative usages, alongside the sustainable production of dedicated aquatic biomass, and using the cascading principle to support the zero-waste concept, can be the key for the quest for autonomy that many nations are aiming for [67] (CBE-JU SC recommendations, 2024).
However, some applications are already well developed and cost-effective, while others offer high potential or a significant market impact but still face challenges related to regulation, regional demand, biomass-sourcing limitations, or the need for substantial research and development [12]. According to the same authors, the feedstock and fertilizers (like fishmeal and organic fertilizers) cluster-related innovations are mature with moderate market value and manageable costs. On the other hand, biomass for food (novel marine foods, functional ingredients) shows strong growth and impact potential but depends on regional markets and tight regulation, while industrial applications (bioplastics, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals) offer the highest market impact but still need heavy R&D and investments.
These challenges were also highlighted within the EU context, where, despite its unique and abundant marine biomass resources, and active research in this field (Figure 4 and Figure 5), there remains a need for tailored policies and investments to turn European Blue biotechnology potential into tangible results [17]. Although EU policies may have improved the development of ocean-related economies, with research in marine-derived collagen and chitin/chitosan increasing in Europe in the last decade, innovation and market translation still remains weak (Figure 3), as evidenced by lower levels of intellectual property filings compared to other regions such as China and USA [17,68]. The translation of this research into innovations is currently dominated by Asia, with countries such as China, Japan, and South Korea leading in both publication output and patent activity related to marine-derived polymers [17]. In contrast, European countries show a relevant academic presence and outputs, with some countries dominating even in the world arena (like Norway or Portugal), but show a relatively weaker representation in intellectual property filings [17].
This suggests that there are limitations or inadequate frameworks in these regions for technology transfer and effective valorization of these resources, with underlying reasons for these limitations—such as technical and strategic challenges—already identified across multiple areas of the Blue bioeconomy [15,17,63].
The main technical challenges of the use of these marine biopolymers are, among others, biomass availability and seasonality, low extraction yields and composition variability due to seasonality, high chemical usage, and limited scalability [70]. There are also reports on challenges in technological access and innovation. One possible approach to reducing some of these challenges is AI-driven optimization (e.g., in extraction efficiency, data analysis) to improve efficiency, reduce waste, and enable scalable production systems [71].
In addition to technological issues, regulatory constraints pose significant hurdles, especially in some regions and in some markets. Regulatory complexity, such as governing safety, quality, labelling, product consistency, source certification, and differences in the requirements depending on the source of the biopolymer and the intended application of the final product are major bottlenecks [29,72]. Specifically, EU regulations concerning novel food, cosmetics, biomedical, pharmaceutics claims and usages, and management of the discard and by-catch from fisheries and aquaculture, underscore the necessity of complying with these regulations at various stages—from raw-material collection to final-product manufacturing [13,73], and this can function as an added burden when competing in a global and unequally demanding world. Environmental impact assessments, and bureaucratic delays were also identified as serious innovation blockers at a regional level [74].
Barriers also persist in technology transfer, as insufficient emphasis on intellectual property (IP) management in the research processes [17,63,72] coupled with low levels of IP literacy leads to lower patenting activity in Europe. Challenges in IP management, costs, and the difficult and specialized patenting process can delay the time it takes for new products to reach the market. Additionally, patent protections are limited to certain territories and durations, and the initial embargo on the publication of recent patent applications delays knowledge dissemination and increases challenges in effectively managing IP within the Blue bioeconomy sector [74].
A lack of education and training has also been identified as a barrier. Policies exist to promote the updating of educational curricula and training programs to integrate bioeconomy concepts and provide practical, industry-specific training, but they are criticized for lacking specificity and not adequately addressing the unique training needs of smaller enterprises and primary producers [75]. Recent policy initiatives to address capacity building, such as the EU Pact for skills, may reduce this gap in the alignment of innovation and IP generation goals.
Raising awareness of the potential of the Blue bioeconomy and marine biopolymers among industry stakeholders, fishermen, the public, and consumers has also been identified as a solution to overcoming these barriers [74]. In particular, strengthening collaboration with manufacturers and product developers is crucial to ensure that research outcomes align with market demands. Similar to the growing recognition of the advantages and sustainability related to biodegradable polymers, increased awareness of these links to the ocean could boost demand for marine biopolymers-derived products, such as smart food packaging and health supplements, and could act as a driver for the technological development of the Blue bioeconomy [68].
Fostering collaboration is continuously pointed out as essential to engage the industry in research and development. Academia–industry collaborations through innovation clusters and co-funded projects can establish critical mass, facilitate knowledge exchange, accelerate knowledge transfer, facilitate political and financial support, and produce the most creative and innovative results to address important societal challenges [74]. However, the current approaches to collaboration are considered too broad, lacking the specific operational details necessary to effectively engage diverse stakeholders and tailor initiatives to the unique regional and/or sectorial contexts and needs of different industries within the bioeconomy [75]. Community-driven approaches may help reduce the few and/or fragmented bio-businesses, low collaboration, and lack of awareness by promoting early, inclusive engagement and regional cooperation. Integrating these strategies into development plans enhances the effectiveness and sustainability of Blue bioeconomy initiatives [15,74]. These collaborations are essential, particularly in areas where there is resistance or hesitation to participate. Building strong partnerships helps to build trust, share knowledge, and demonstrate the benefits of involvement, making these stakeholders more willing to engage in such activities [74].

4. Final Remarks

Crustaceans contain approximately 40% meat, with the remaining 60% being inedible [68] and mostly discarded as waste. However, crustacean waste contains chitin, a biocompatible and biodegradable polymer that can be processed into chitosan and used in advanced medical technologies, such as nerve-regeneration conduits (e.g., Reaxon, manufactured by Medovent in Germany [76]), as well as in environmental solutions like water clarifiers (e.g., SeaKlear, produced by Primex in Iceland [77].
Similarly, the fish-processing industry produces a huge amount (ranging from over 25% to 70%) of by-products [78], which can also be valued as a source of collagen to produce high-value products such skin-regeneration and wound-healing biomaterials (for example, Omega3 Wound, manufactured by Kerecis in Iceland [79]).
This growing recognition of the value of marine bioresources and their biomass and processes lies in the comprehensive exploration of their diverse applications across multiple areas, generating new market opportunities and fostering new sustainable models of economic development like the bioeconomy. However, potential weaknesses in Europe for technological innovation may include the need for further in-depth analysis of the specific challenges within the marine-derived collagen and chitin/chitosan value chains. As we and several authors point out, the bottlenecks for Blue bioeconomy development in Europe, such as persisting knowledge gaps, environmental sustainability concerns, regulatory complexity and uncertainty, technological scaling needs and gaps, high monetary and time investment needed, disconnected cross-collaboration frameworks, and persisting challenges for market acceptance of biobased products, are equally applicable to marine collagen and chitin supply chains [17,74,80]. In particular, a significant hurdle remains in the uptake of marine biopolymer research by industry, particularly among manufacturers and product developers. Many companies face uncertainty regarding the scalability, cost-efficiency, lack of standardized quality, and regulatory pathways across several application areas and reliable supply chains, particularly in raw-material limitation, when using marine-derived ingredients [22,81]. In this regard, the contribution of aquaculture-sourced raw materials and selective processing may offer promising alternatives to reduce dependency on natural seasonal biomass while ongoing ecosystem monitoring can help ensure that any harvested sources are managed sustainably [13,26]. These challenges highlight key priorities that emerge for advancing the development of marine collagen and chitin/chitosan value chains. First, advancing sustainable and scalable extraction methods—particularly those that reduce environmental impact through green or enzymatic processes—remains essential [82]. Equally important is the establishment of standardized protocols for quality consistency, which would facilitate both regulatory approval and industrial uptake [22]. In parallel, there is a clear need for comprehensive life-cycle and economic and social analysis to substantiate sustainability claims and guide investment decisions, which are currently very limited and often purely academic [13], for example, comparative life-cycle analysis or environmental-impact assessment of marine-derived versus terrestrial-derived materials. Finally, addressing regulatory complexities, having an understanding of market opportunities, and analysing and improving market acceptance will require supportive policy frameworks that reduce perceived risks, promote investment in sustainable innovations, and improve the transdisciplinary collaboration among researchers, industry stakeholders, and policymakers. Together, these directions can help close persistent gaps and advance the integration of marine-derived polymers into a sustainable European Blue bioeconomy.
Although five years remain to achieve the UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, recent monitoring of all SDGs in the EU context highlights ongoing challenges. The 2024 Eurostat report emphasizes that while waste generation has slightly decreased, the circular use of materials is not increasing quickly enough to meet long-term targets [83]. This signals a need for accelerated efforts to scale up sustainable-resource use and waste reduction across all sectors—including the marine bioeconomy [83]. Other SDGs are also at risk of not being reached and the low investment in SDG14 is also of particular relevance to this work and context. [84] For example, Northern European regions—such as Norway and the Baltic Sea—have relatively advanced marine biotechnology sectors, with approaches combining research, industrial application, and regulatory frameworks that encourage the sustainable valorization of marine biomass and support circular-economy goals. In comparison with the Mediterranean, countries in this region often face challenges related to fragmented regulatory structures, limited infrastructure, or underexploited marine-biomass streams [85].
Beyond Europe, in countries like Brazil, marine biotechnology is advancing, supported by national research initiatives, but challenges remain in translating academic research into clinical products, often due to gaps in regulatory frameworks, and the need of training programs to foster coordination between academia, industry, and government [84].
Through continued scientific research, innovation-driven policies, and strategic cross-sectoral collaboration across research, industry, administration, legal services, market analysis, and public or social sectors, these polymers can play a role in the EU Blue bioeconomy and in supporting the neutrality ambitions of the European continent. In fact, the EU Blue Economy Report 2025 highlights that Blue Biotechnology—driven by marine-derived innovations like these polymers—grew by 19% in gross value added and 18% in turnover in 2022, reflecting its increasing role in advancing high-value, sustainable sectors across multiple industries, such as pharmaceuticals, biomaterials, and ecosystems [86] Other recent reports from OECD and the UN on ocean-sustainable economy and marine biotech potentially co-substantiate these projections too [87,88].
Their Integration Into high-value supply chains will not only support circularity and green innovation but will also foster economic resilience in coastal communities.
Knowledge transfer and capacity building can also play a crucial role in advancing the bioeconomy of these polymers in other regions of the world, enabling the adoption of sustainable marine biotechnology.

5. Materials and Methods

This review analyzes the applications of marine-derived collagen and chitin/chitosan from two perspectives based on their alignment with the SDGs, and their contribution to Blue bioeconomy strategies.
The potential contribution of collagen and chitosan value chains to specific SDGs was identified by examining how IP claimed main application areas—health, food, wellness, and environmental—aligns with the goals and targets outlined in official SDGs documentation [44]. Global progress toward these selected targets, as reported in the UN SDG Report 2024 [45], was indicated using the following classifications: 🟥 Off track, 🟨 Limited progress, 🟩 On track.
The degree of contribution of each marine-derived biopolymer to each SDG was assessed using data from a previous study [17], which analyzed global trends in patents and scientific publications related to these polymers. Specifically, the percentage of distribution of International Patent Classification (IPC) codes—each corresponding to a specific technological field—determined in that study was used as a proxy for each thematic focus contribution. For example, the IPC subclasses A61K, A61P, and A61L are associated with medical, pharmaceutical, and wound-healing technologies, while A23L and A23K relate to food and feed technologies. The sum of these IPC thematic codes provided a distribution per biopolymer across thematic areas. These percentage ranges of IPC occurrence (1.3–25.4% for collagen; 1.1–16.3% for chitin/chitosan) were then divided into three equal-width categories using the equal interval method. This allowed the classification of each domain’s contribution as Strong (🟢), Moderate (🟡) or None/residual (🔴) levels across thematic fields. For the more general SDGs impact analysis, an empirical approach was used based on the existing literature and state-of-the-art knowledge, but subject to the researcher’s expertise and theoretical background, to determine the degree of contribution to each target. The same color code with round circles was used.
A subset of data was also extracted from the study [17] to report the intellectual property and academic research trends in Europe. In the original study, the patent search was conducted using the WIPO PATENTSCOPE database, employing keyword queries applied to titles and abstracts, and refined through inclusion/exclusion criteria based on marine origin and relevance. The scientific publications were retrieved from the Scopus database using the same keyword logic and were screened by title, abstract, and full text when necessary to verify marine origin and application focus. The study identified a total of 3515 patent documents (2372 for collagen and 1143 for chitin/chitosan) and 877 scientific publications (419 for collagen and 458 for chitin/chitosan) from 1990 to 2023. For the purpose of this review, only data concerning European countries were selected, resulting in a final subset of 24 patents and 205 publications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A. and H.V.; writing—original draft, M.A. and H.V.; writing—review and editing, M.A. and H.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the ERA Chair BESIDE project financed by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 951389 (https://doi.org/10.3030/951389). This work is funded by national funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia I.P., under the project/grant UID/50006 + LA/P/0094/2020 (doi.org/10.54499/LA/P/0094/2020).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rahman, A. Marine Collagen and Chitin: Promising Applications in Interdisciplinary Fields. Mar. Drugs 2024, 22, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Flórez, M.; Guerra-Rodríguez, E.; Cazón, P.; Vázquez, M. Chitosan for Food Packaging: Recent Advances in Active and Intelligent Films. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 124, 107328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Piekarska, K.; Sikora, M.; Owczarek, M.; Jóźwik-Pruska, J.; Wiśniewska-Wrona, M. Chitin and Chitosan as Polymers of the Future—Obtaining, Modification, Life Cycle Assessment and Main Directions of Application. Polymers 2023, 15, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xu, N.; Peng, X.-L.; Li, H.-R.; Liu, J.-X.; Cheng, J.-S.-Y.; Qi, X.-Y.; Ye, S.-J.; Gong, H.-L.; Zhao, X.-H.; Yu, J.; et al. Marine-Derived Collagen as Biomaterials for Human Health. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 702108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Carvalho, D.N.; Gonçalves, C.; Oliveira, J.M.; William, D.W.; Mearns-Spragg, A.; Reis, R.L.; Silva, T.H. Innovative Methodology for Marine Collagen–Chitosan–Fucoidan Hydrogels Production, Tailoring Rheological Properties towards Biomedical Application. Green. Chem. 2021, 23, 7016–7029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yano, S.; Yamaguchi, K.; Shibata, M.; Ifuku, S.; Teramoto, N. Photocrosslinked Fish Collagen Peptide/Chitin Nanofiber Composite Hydrogels from Marine Resources: Preparation, Mechanical Properties, and an In Vitro Study. Polymers 2023, 15, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Singh, S. Chitin, Chitosan, and Derivatives Market Research Report: Information by Type (Chitin, Chitosan, Glucosamine, and Others), Application (Food & Beverages, Pharmaceuticals Nutraceuticals, Animal Feed, Agriculture, and Others), And by Region (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, And Rest Of The World) –Market Forecast Till 2032. In Chitin Chitosan Derivatives Market; Market Research Future: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gotadki, R. Marine Collagen Market Research Report By Source, By Form, By Application, By Target Consumers, By Distribution Channel, By Regional Source. In Marine Collagen Market; Market Research Future: New York, NY, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  9. Martínez-Puig, D.; Costa-Larrión, E.; Rubio-Rodríguez, N.; Gálvez-Martín, P. Collagen Supplementation for Joint Health: The Link between Composition and Scientific Knowledge. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Chaski, C.; Polyzos, N.; Tzortzakis, N.; Petropoulos, S.A. Sustainable Agriculture Systems in Vegetable Production Using Chitin and Chitosan as Plant Biostimulants. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Vieira, H.; Leal, M.C.; Calado, R. Fifty Shades of Blue: How Blue Biotechnology Is Shaping the Bioeconomy. Trends Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 940–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pakseresht, A.; Kermani, A.; Decker-Lange, C. Towards a Sustainable and Circular Blue Bioeconomy: A Scoping Review. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2025, 216, 124157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dondero, L.; De Negri Atanasio, G.; Tardanico, F.; Lertora, E.; Boggia, R.; Capra, V.; Cometto, A.; Costamagna, M.; LSE, F.; Feletti, M.; et al. Unlocking the Potential of Marine Sidestreams in the Blue Economy: Lessons Learned from the EcoeFISHent Project on Fish Collagen. Mar. Biotechnol. 2025, 27, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zilia, F.; Orsi, L.; Costantini, M.; Tedesco, D.E.A.; Sugni, M. Case Study of Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainable Business Model for Sea Urchin Waste. Clean. Environ. Syst. 2023, 8, 100108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lees, L.; Paupério, M.; Rätsep, M.; Gasiūnaitė, Z.R.; Vaitkevičienė, V.; Tosatto, S.; Terenzi, A.; Andrén, S.; Aps, R.; Orav-Kotta, H.; et al. Crafting Blue Visions for a Sustainable Blue Bioeconomy in European Coastal Regions through Communities of Practice. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2025, 262, 107588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barañano, L.; Garbisu, N.; Alkorta, I.; Araujo, A.; Garbisu, C. Contextualization of the Bioeconomy Concept through Its Links with Related Concepts and the Challenges Facing Humanity. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vieira, H.; Almeida, M.; Shafique, M.N.; Leal, M.C.; Lillebø, A.I. Policy Impacts of Intellectual Property and Academic Research Trends in Marine-Derived Collagen and Chitin/Chitosan Value Chains. Mar. Policy 2025, 173, 106575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shoulders, M.D.; Raines, R.T. Collagen Structure and Stability. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009, 78, 929–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Silva, T.H.; Moreira-Silva, J.; Marques, A.L.P.; Domingues, A.; Bayon, Y.; Reis, R.L. Marine Origin Collagens and Its Potential Applications. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 5881–5901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. de Melo Oliveira, V.; Assis, C.R.D.; de Aquino Marques Costa, B.; de Araújo Neri, R.C.; Monte, F.T.D.; da Costa Vasconcelos Freitas, H.M.S.; França, R.C.P.; Santos, J.F.; de Souza Bezerra, R.; Porto, A.L.F. Physical, Biochemical, Densitometric and Spectroscopic Techniques for Characterization Collagen from Alternative Sources: A Review Based on the Sustainable Valorization of Aquatic by-Products. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1224, 129023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Almeida, M.; Silva, T.; Solstad, R.G.; Lillebø, A.I.; Calado, R.; Vieira, H. How Significant Are Marine Invertebrate Collagens? Exploring Trends in Research and Innovation. Mar. Drugs 2024, 23, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Islam, J.; Mis Solval, K.E. Recent Advancements in Marine Collagen: Exploring New Sources, Processing Approaches, and Nutritional Applications. Mar. Drugs 2025, 23, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, S.; Ji, Y.; He, Y.; Dong, J.; Li, H.; Yu, S. Effect of Environmental PH on the Mechanics of Chitin and Chitosan: A Single-Molecule Study. Polymers 2024, 16, 995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Aranaz, I.; Alcántara, A.R.; Civera, M.C.; Arias, C.; Elorza, B.; Heras Caballero, A.; Acosta, N. Chitosan: An Overview of Its Properties and Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kurita, K. Chitin and Chitosan: Functional Biopolymers from Marine Crustaceans. Mar. Biotechnol. 2006, 8, 203–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vieira, H.; Lestre, G.M.; Solstad, R.G.; Cabral, A.E.; Botelho, A.; Helbig, C.; Coppola, D.; de Pascale, D.; Robbens, J.; Raes, K.; et al. Current and Expected Trends for the Marine Chitin/Chitosan and Collagen Value Chains. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Frenchibai, P.B.B.; Vinayagam, R.; Ambigapathi, D.; Anbazhagan, G.K.; Elumalai, L.; Palaniyandi, S.; Siddan, N.; Thangam, G.S.; Dharmalingam, K. Chitosan from Shells of Crustaceans and Its Application in the Synthesis of Biodegradable Polymers. Biomed. Mater. Devices 2025, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hamdi, M.; Wang, D.; Li, S.; Su, F. Unveiling an Innovative Sustainable Blue Resource-Ecofriendly Extraction Technique towards a Circular Economy: Optimization of Natural Deep Eutectic Solvent and Ultrasonication Synergistic Pathways for Type-I Collagen Refined Recovery from Discarded Fish Scales. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 300, 140296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Laasri, I.; Bakkali, M.; Mejias, L.; Laglaoui, A. Marine Collagen: Unveiling the Blue Resource-Extraction Techniques and Multifaceted Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253, 127253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhu, H.; Chen, S.; Xue, J.; Wang, R.; Wang, X.; Xiao, Z.; Luo, Y. Chitin Nanofibers Derived from Deep Eutectic Solvent Extraction and Ammonium Persulfate Oxidation as a Seed Nanopriming Agent for Microgreen Growth Enhancement. Sustain. Food Technol. 2025, 3, 677–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gutierrez-Canul, C.D.; Can-Herrera, L.A.; de Jesús Ramírez-Rivera, E.; Prinyawiwatkul, W.; Sauri-Duch, E.; Moo-Huchin, V.M.; Hernández-Núñez, E. A Review of Classical and Rising Approaches the Extraction and Utilization of Marine Collagen. BioTech 2025, 14, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mohan, K.; Ganesan, A.R.; Ezhilarasi, P.N.; Kondamareddy, K.K.; Rajan, D.K.; Sathishkumar, P.; Rajarajeswaran, J.; Conterno, L. Green and Eco-Friendly Approaches for the Extraction of Chitin and Chitosan: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 287, 119349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Diogo, G.S.; López-Senra, E.; Pirraco, R.P.; Canadas, R.F.; Fernandes, E.M.; Serra, J.; Pérez-Martín, R.I.; Sotelo, C.G.; Marques, A.P.; González, P.; et al. Marine Collagen/Apatite Composite Scaffolds Envisaging Hard Tissue Applications. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ferrario, C.; Rusconi, F.; Pulaj, A.; Macchi, R.; Landini, P.; Paroni, M.; Colombo, G.; Martinello, T.; Melotti, L.; Gomiero, C.; et al. From Food Waste to Innovative Biomaterial: Sea Urchin-Derived Collagen for Applications in Skin Regenerative Medicine. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. León-López, A.; Morales-Peñaloza, A.; Martínez-Juárez, V.M.; Vargas-Torres, A.; Zeugolis, D.I.; Aguirre-Álvarez, G. Hydrolyzed Collagen—Sources and Applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 4031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Aguirre-Cruz, G.; León-López, A.; Cruz-Gómez, V.; Jiménez-Alvarado, R.; Aguirre-Álvarez, G. Collagen Hydrolysates for Skin Protection: Oral Administration and Topical Formulation. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Li, P.H.; Lu, W.C.; Chan, Y.J.; Ko, W.C.; Jung, C.C.; Le Huynh, D.T.; Ji, Y.X. Extraction and Characterization of Collagen from Sea Cucumber (Holothuria Cinerascens) and Its Potential Application in Moisturizing Cosmetics. Aquaculture 2020, 515, 734590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tunku Mahmud, T.H.; Abdul-Aziz, A.; Muda, R. A Review on the Potential Use of Chitosan-Based Delivery System in Mild Facial Cleansing Formulation. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2015, 64, 432–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guzmán, E.; Ortega, F.; Rubio, R.G. Chitosan: A Promising Multifunctional Cosmetic Ingredient for Skin and Hair Care. Cosmetics 2022, 9, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hamed, I.; Özogul, F.; Regenstein, J.M. Industrial Applications of Crustacean By-Products (Chitin, Chitosan, and Chitooligosaccharides): A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 48, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Baharlouei, P.; Rahman, A. Chitin and Chitosan: Prospective Biomedical Applications in Drug Delivery, Cancer Treatment, and Wound Healing. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bertrand, M.; Simonin, S.; Bach, B. Applications of Chitosan in the Agri-Food Sector: A Review. Carbohydr. Res. 2024, 543, 109219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ronnasi, B.; McKillop, S.P.; Ourabi, M.; Perry, M.; Sharp, H.A.; Lessard, B.H. Chitosan-Based Electronics: The Importance of Acid Strength and Plasticizing Additives on Device Performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 65425–65435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. In Proceedings of the Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly, New York, NY, USA, 25 September 2015; pp. 1–13, 42809. [Google Scholar]
  45. United Nations. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2024. 2024. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2024/ (accessed on 25 July 2025).
  46. Shaik, M.I.; Rahman, S.H.A.; Yusri, A.S.; Ismail-Fitry, M.R.; Kumar, N.S.S.; Sarbon, N.M. A Review on the Processing Technique, Physicochemical, and Bioactive Properties of Marine Collagen. J. Food Sci. 2024, 89, 5205–5229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Satitsri, S.; Muanprasat, C. Chitin and Chitosan Derivatives as Biomaterial Resources for Biological and Biomedical Applications. Molecules 2020, 25, 5961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Younes, I.; Rinaudo, M. Chitin and Chitosan Preparation from Marine Sources. Structure, Properties and Applications. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 1133–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Cadar, E.; Pesterau, A.-M.; Sirbu, R.; Negreanu-Pirjol, B.S.; Tomescu, C.L. Jellyfishes—Significant Marine Resources with Potential in the Wound-Healing Process: A Review. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, J.-K.; Yeh, C.-H.; Wang, L.-C.; Liou, T.-H.; Shen, C.-R.; Liu, C.-L. Chitosan, the Marine Functional Food, Is a Potent Adsorbent of Humic Acid. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 2488–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. In Jeong, S.; Kim, S.Y.; Cho, S.K.; Chong, M.S.; Kim, K.S.; Kim, H.; Lee, S.B.; Lee, Y.M. Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts Composed of Marine Collagen and PLGA Fibers Using Pulsatile Perfusion Bioreactors. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 1115–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jin-feng, D.; Xiu-Rong, S.; Yan-yan, L.; Xiang, G.; Fu-peng, Y.; Xin, J. The Hypolipidemic and Antioxidative Effects of Jellyfish Collagen Peptide. Nat. Product. Res. Dev. 2012, 24, 362–365. [Google Scholar]
  53. Wong, R.P.M.; Zhou, Z.K.; Strappe, P.M. The Anti-Obesogenic and Anti-Diabetic Properties of Marine Collagen Peptides. Front. Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 3, 1270392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Singh, B.; Maharjan, S.; Cho, K.-H.; Cui, L.; Park, I.-K.; Choi, Y.-J.; Cho, C.-S. Chitosan-Based Particulate Systems for the Delivery of Mucosal Vaccines against Infectious Diseases. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 110, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Román-Doval, R.; Torres-Arellanes, S.P.; Tenorio-Barajas, A.Y.; Gómez-Sánchez, A.; Valencia-Lazcano, A.A. Chitosan: Properties and Its Application in Agriculture in Context of Molecular Weight. Polymers 2023, 15, 2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Abdulhameed, A.S.; Abdullah, S.; Al-Masud, A.A.; Al Omari, R.H.; Abualhaija, M.; Algburi, S. Production of Sustainable Adsorbent of Crosslinked Chitosan-Oxalate and Modified Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Seed for Highly Efficient Adsorption of Crystal Violet Dye: Water Treatment and Biomass Valorization. Biomass Bioenergy 2025, 199, 107889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Govindharaj, M.; Roopavath, U.K.; Rath, S.N. Valorization of Discarded Marine Eel Fish Skin for Collagen Extraction as a 3D Printable Blue Biomaterial for Tissue Engineering. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 230, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, Z.; Xue, Y.; Yang, J.; Lin, W.; Babichuk, I.S. Sustainable, Biodegradable, Flexible Piezoelectric Quaternary Ammonium Chitosan Film Pressure Sensors for Human Motion Detection and Human-Computer Interaction. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2025, 389, 116549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rahman, M.M.; Maniruzzaman, M. A New Route of Production of the Meso-Porous Chitosan with Well-Organized Honeycomb Surface Microstructure from Shrimp Waste without Destroying the Original Structure of Native Shells: Extraction, Modification and Characterization Study. Results Eng. 2023, 19, 101362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. El Feky, A.R.; Ismaiel, M.; Yılmaz, M.; Madkour, F.M.; El Nemr, A.; Ibrahim, H.A.H. Biodegradable Plastic Formulated from Chitosan of Aristeus Antennatus Shells with Castor Oil as a Plasticizer Agent and Starch as a Filling Substrate. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 11161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. da Paixão Cansado, I.P.; Mourão, P.A.M.; Castanheiro, J.E.; Geraldo, P.F.; Suhas; Suero, S.R.; Cano, B.L. A Review of the Biomass Valorization Hierarchy. Sustainability 2025, 17, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Fraga-Corral, M.; Ronza, P.; Garcia-Oliveira, P.; Pereira, A.G.; Losada, A.P.; Prieto, M.A.; Quiroga, M.I.; Simal-Gandara, J. Aquaculture as a Circular Bio-Economy Model with Galicia as a Study Case: How to Transform Waste into Revalorized by-Products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 119, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Almeida, M.; Corticeiro, S.; Oliveira, B.R.F.; Laranjeiro, D.; Lillebø, A.; Vieira, H. The Needs and Challenges of the Blue Economy Sector in Portugal: Bridging National and European Strategies with the Perceptions of the Stakeholders. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 384, 125468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Challenge 4:Develop a Sustainable and Equitable Ocean Economy. In UNESCO-IOC Ocean DecadeVision 2030 White Papers; UNESCO-IOC: Paris, France, 2024; (The Ocean Decade Series, 51.4.).
  65. Rahaman, S.; Dana, L.P.; Anjum, N. Empowering Women in Building a Sustainable Blue Economy. In Handbook of Sustainable Blue Economy; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  66. European Comission. The European Ocean Pact. In Proceedings of the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, Belgium, 5 June 2025. [Google Scholar]
  67. CBE JU Circular Bio-Based Europe Joint Undertaking CBE JU Recommendations; Brussels. 2024. Available online: https://icus-society.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ESCCCS-2024-guideline7.pdf (accessed on 30 June 2025).
  68. Amiri, H.; Aghbashlo, M.; Sharma, M.; Gaffey, J.; Manning, L.; Moosavi Basri, S.M.; Kennedy, J.F.; Gupta, V.K.; Tabatabaei, M. Chitin and Chitosan Derived from Crustacean Waste Valorization Streams Can Support Food Systems and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Food 2022, 3, 822–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. FAO Global Production by Production Source Quantity (1950–2022). 2022. Available online: https://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics-query/en/global_production/global_production_quantity (accessed on 1 May 2025).
  70. Carvalho, D.N.; Gonçalves, C.; Sousa, R.O.; Reis, R.L.; Oliveira, J.M.; Silva, T.H. Extraction and Purification of Biopolymers from Marine Origin Sources Envisaging Their Use for Biotechnological Applications. Mar. Biotechnol. 2024, 26, 1079–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Srinivasan, A.; Gupta, A.; Narayanamurthy, V. A Comprehensive Review of AI-Based Collagen Valorization: Recent Trends, Innovations in Extraction, and Applications. Green. Anal. Chem. 2025, 12, 100212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Augusto, A.; Lemos, M.; Silva, S. Exploring Marine-Based Food Production: The Challenges for a Sustainable and Fast Biotechnology-Based Development. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 8255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kantak, M.N.; Bharate, S.S. Analysis of Clinical Trials on Biomaterial and Therapeutic Applications of Chitosan: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 278, 118999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rotter, A.; Giannakourou, A.; Argente García, J.E.; Quero, G.M.; Auregan, C.; Triantaphyllidis, G.; Venetsanopoulou, A.; De Carolis, R.; Efstratiou, C.; Aboal, M.; et al. Identification of Marine Biotechnology Value Chains with High Potential in the Northern Mediterranean Region. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Faulkner, J.P.; Murphy, E.; Scott, M. Downscaling EU Bioeconomy Policy for National Implementation. Clean. Circ. Bioecon. 2024, 9, 100121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. KeriMedical REAXON® DIRECT–REPAIR OF PERIPHERAL NERVE DISCONTINUITIES. Available online: https://www.kerimedical.com/en/portail-kerimedical-en/home-professional/reaxon-direct/ (accessed on 25 July 2025).
  77. Primex ChitoClear. Available online: https://www.primex.is/ (accessed on 25 July 2025).
  78. Caruso, G.; Floris, R.; Serangeli, C.; Di Paola, L. Fishery Wastes as a Yet Undiscovered Treasure from the Sea: Biomolecules Sources, Extraction Methods and Valorization. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kerecis. FISH SKIN GRAFTS RICH IN OMEGA-3 FATTY ACIDS. Available online: https://www.kerecis.com/omega3-wound/ (accessed on 25 July 2025).
  80. Rotter, A.; Varamogianni-Mamatsi, D.; Zvonar Pobirk, A.; Gosenca Matjaž, M.; Cueto, M.; Díaz-Marrero, A.R.; Jónsdóttir, R.; Sveinsdóttir, K.; Catalá, T.S.; Romano, G.; et al. Marine Cosmetics and the Blue Bioeconomy: From Sourcing to Success Stories. iScience 2024, 27, 111339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Olunusi, S.O.; Ramli, N.H.; Adam, F.; Hossain, E.; Kim, T.H. Chitosan as a Sustainable Alternative for Fresh Food Packaging: Structural Insights, Modification Strategies, and Innovations for Commercial Viability. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 318, 145065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Hu, B.; Zong, Z.; Han, L.; Cao, J.; Yang, J.; Zheng, Q.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Yao, Z. Jellyfish Collagen: A Promising and Sustainable Marine Biomaterial with Emerging Applications in Food, Cosmetics, and Biomedical—A Review. Appl. Food Res. 2025, 5, 101165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Eurostat Sustainable Development in the European Union Monitoring Report on Progress towards the SDGs in an EU Context; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2024.
  84. Thompson, F.; Krüger, R.; Thompson, C.C.; Berlinck, R.G.S.; Coutinho, R.; Landell, M.F.; Pavão, M.; Mourão, P.A.S.; Salles, A.; Negri, N.; et al. Marine Biotechnology in Brazil: Recent Developments and Its Potential for Innovation. Front. Mar. Sci. 2018, 5, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Rudovica, V.; Rotter, A.; Gaudêncio, S.P.; Novoveská, L.; Akgül, F.; Akslen-Hoel, L.K.; Alexandrino, D.A.M.; Anne, O.; Arbidans, L.; Atanassova, M.; et al. Valorization of Marine Waste: Use of Industrial By-Products and Beach Wrack Towards the Production of High Added-Value Products. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 723333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. European Union. The EU Blue Economy Report—2025 Edition; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  87. Sachs, J.D.; Lafortune, G.; Fuller, G. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2025 Financing Sustainable Development to 2030 and Mid-Century; Dublin University Press: Dublin, Ireland, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  88. OECD. Promoting Sustainable Ocean Economies. In Best Practices in Development Co-operation; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Marinedrugs 23 00318 g002
Figure 2. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and targets supported by the development and use of marine-derived collagen and chitin identified through their main application areas—health, food, wellness, and environment [44].
Figure 2. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and targets supported by the development and use of marine-derived collagen and chitin identified through their main application areas—health, food, wellness, and environment [44].
Marinedrugs 23 00318 g002
Marinedrugs 23 00318 g003
Figure 3. Clusters of Blue biotechnological innovations identified by Pakseresht et al. [12]: (1) bioenergy from marine biomass, (2) biomass for food, (3) feedstock and fertilizers, and (4) industrial applications. These clusters reflect the valorization potential of marine-derived resources and their alignment with sustainable and circular business model patterns.
Figure 3. Clusters of Blue biotechnological innovations identified by Pakseresht et al. [12]: (1) bioenergy from marine biomass, (2) biomass for food, (3) feedstock and fertilizers, and (4) industrial applications. These clusters reflect the valorization potential of marine-derived resources and their alignment with sustainable and circular business model patterns.
Marinedrugs 23 00318 g003
Marinedrugs 23 00318 g004aMarinedrugs 23 00318 g004b
Figure 4. Proportion of total aquaculture and capture production of aquatic species by animal group in Europe. Data obtained from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [69].
Figure 4. Proportion of total aquaculture and capture production of aquatic species by animal group in Europe. Data obtained from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [69].
Marinedrugs 23 00318 g004aMarinedrugs 23 00318 g004b
Marinedrugs 23 00318 g005
Figure 5. Number of scientific publications and patents related to marine-derived collagen and chitin/chitosan in Europe (1990–2023) Data adapted from [17]. European policy strategies directly or indirectly linked to the Blue bioeconomy.
Figure 5. Number of scientific publications and patents related to marine-derived collagen and chitin/chitosan in Europe (1990–2023) Data adapted from [17]. European policy strategies directly or indirectly linked to the Blue bioeconomy.
Marinedrugs 23 00318 g005
Table 1. Comparative overview of collagen and chitin/chitosan: structure, sources, properties, applications, and commercial trends.
Table 1. Comparative overview of collagen and chitin/chitosan: structure, sources, properties, applications, and commercial trends.
Marine CollagenMarine Chitosan (from Chitin)
Chemical StructureMarinedrugs 23 00318 i001
-
Triple-helix of 3 α polypeptide chains (Gly-Xaa-Yaa)—rich in glycine, proline, hydroxyproline
-
Linear polysaccharide (β1→4)-linked GlcN and GlcNAc units—derived from chitin via deacetylation
Sustainable SourcesMarinedrugs 23 00318 i002
-
Fish skin and scales
-
Jellyfish
-
Sea cucumbers
-
Crustacean and mollusc skeletons
Sustainable Processing/ExtractionMarinedrugs 23 00318 i003
-
Enzymatic hydrolysis- Green solvents
-
Fermentation-Ultrasound-assisted extraction
-
Similar sustainable extraction methods being explored
PropertiesMarinedrugs 23 00318 i004
-
Biocompatible; bioactive profile; low immunogenicity; scaffold-forming
-
Biocompatible; biodegradable; non-toxic- antimicrobial; film-forming
Key
Biomedical/Pharmaceutical ApplicationsMarinedrugs 23 00318 i005
-
Tissue engineering
-
Wound healing
-
Antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-hypertensive uses
-
Tissue regeneration
-
Wound healing
-
Antitumoral, antimicrobial, antioxidant uses
-
Nanotechnology (biosensors, drug delivery, bioelectronics)
Cosmetic ApplicationsMarinedrugs 23 00318 i006
-
Skin health
-
Moisturizer
-
Anti-aging
-
Elasticity improvement
-
Film-forming for protective coatings (indirect cosmetic potential)
-
Advanced delivery systems to the skin
Food/Nutraceutical UsesMarinedrugs 23 00318 i007
-
Nutritional supplements
-
Functional foods
-
Food preservation (antioxidant and antimicrobial films)
-
Food additives
Environmental UsesMarinedrugs 23 00318 i008Limited (potential in sustainability but
underexplored commercially)
-
Wastewater treatment (chelation, flocculation)
-
Agriculture (biopesticide, biostimulant)
-
Animal feed (growth promoter)
Commercial Trend &
PatentsMarinedrugs 23 00318 i009
-
Focused on health and food sectors
-
Similar focus to collagen
-
Environmental uses underrepresented in IP landscape
Table 2. Contribution of collagen and chitin/chitosan value chain and related IP to selected Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and targets organized by market application. Square color icons (🟥 Off track, 🟨 Limited progress, 🟩 On track, ⬜no data) indicate the global status of each target based on the UN SDG Report 2024 SDG Progress [45]. Rounded color icons (🟢 Strong, 🟡 Moderate, 🔴 None or residual, ⚪ not estimated) indicate the degree of contribution collagen and chitin/chitosan to each target.
Table 2. Contribution of collagen and chitin/chitosan value chain and related IP to selected Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and targets organized by market application. Square color icons (🟥 Off track, 🟨 Limited progress, 🟩 On track, ⬜no data) indicate the global status of each target based on the UN SDG Report 2024 SDG Progress [45]. Rounded color icons (🟢 Strong, 🟡 Moderate, 🔴 None or residual, ⚪ not estimated) indicate the degree of contribution collagen and chitin/chitosan to each target.
AreaApplicable SDGsApplicable TargetsProgress CollagenChitin
Potential Contribution
Section 1—Application-Driven SDG Contributions
HealthcareMarinedrugs 23 00318 i010Marinedrugs 23 00318 i0113.4 reduce premature mortality from non-communicable diseases 🟨🟢🟢
3.8 access to safe, quality, affordable medicines and vaccines🟥🟢🟢
CosmeticsMarinedrugs 23 00318 i012Marinedrugs 23 00318 i0133.9 reduce health impact from hazardous chemicals and air, water, and soil pollution and contamination🟩🔴🔴
Food & NutritionMarinedrugs 23 00318 i014Marinedrugs 23 00318 i0152.2 address nutritional needs🟥🟢🟡
Water treatmentMarinedrugs 23 00318 i016Marinedrugs 23 00318 i0176.3 improve water quality by reducing pollution🟨🔴🟡

AgricultureMarinedrugs 23 00318 i018		Marinedrugs 23 00318 i0192.4 ensure sustainable food-production systems⬜🔴🟢
Marinedrugs 23 00318 i02015.1 ensure the conservation, restoration, and sustainable use of terrestrial and inland freshwater ecosystems🟥🔴🟢
Table 3. Other SDGs including 14, Empirical and Potential Contribution of collagen and chitin/chitosan value chains to selected Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and targets. Square color icons (🟥 Off track, 🟨 Limited progress, 🟩 On track, ⬜no data) indicate the global status of each target based on the UN SDG Report 2024 SDG Progress [45]. Rounded color icons (🟢 Strong, 🟡 Moderate, 🔴 None or residual, ⚪ not estimated) indicate the degree of contribution collagen and chitin/chitosan to each target.
Table 3. Other SDGs including 14, Empirical and Potential Contribution of collagen and chitin/chitosan value chains to selected Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and targets. Square color icons (🟥 Off track, 🟨 Limited progress, 🟩 On track, ⬜no data) indicate the global status of each target based on the UN SDG Report 2024 SDG Progress [45]. Rounded color icons (🟢 Strong, 🟡 Moderate, 🔴 None or residual, ⚪ not estimated) indicate the degree of contribution collagen and chitin/chitosan to each target.
Applicable SDGsApplicable TargetsProgressCollagenChitin
Potential Contribution
Marinedrugs 23 00318 i021 14.1 prevent and reduce marine pollution 🟨🟡🟢
14.2 sustainably manage and protect marine and coastal ecosystems 🟨🟢🟢
14.a increase scientific knowledge, develop research capacity, and transfer marine technology for ocean health 🟥🟢🟢
Marinedrugs 23 00318 i022 4.4 promotion of lifelong learning opportunities through capacity building, skills development ⬜🟡🟡
4.7 acquire knowledge and skills to promote sustainable development ⬜🟡🟡
Marinedrugs 23 00318 i023 5.5 ensure women’s effective participation and equal opportunities for leadership 🟥🟡🟡
Marinedrugs 23 00318 i024 8.2 improve economic productivity through diversification and innovation 🟥🟡🟡
8.3 promote policies for jobs, entrepreneurship, and innovation 🟥🟡🟡
8.4 improve resource efficiency in consumption and production 🟨🟡🟡
Marinedrugs 23 00318 i0259.5 enhance scientific research, upgrade the technological capabilities of industrial sectors🟩🟡🟡
Marinedrugs 23 00318 i026 12.2 sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources 🟥🟢🟢
12.3 food losses reduction along production and supply chains 🟥🟡🟡
12.5 reduce waste generation through prevention, reduction, recycling, and reuse 🟥🟢🟢
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Almeida, M.; Vieira, H. Marine-Derived Collagen and Chitosan: Perspectives on Applications Using the Lens of UN SDGs and Blue Bioeconomy Strategies. Mar. Drugs 2025, 23, 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23080318

AMA Style

Almeida M, Vieira H. Marine-Derived Collagen and Chitosan: Perspectives on Applications Using the Lens of UN SDGs and Blue Bioeconomy Strategies. Marine Drugs. 2025; 23(8):318. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23080318

Chicago/Turabian Style

Almeida, Mariana, and Helena Vieira. 2025. "Marine-Derived Collagen and Chitosan: Perspectives on Applications Using the Lens of UN SDGs and Blue Bioeconomy Strategies" Marine Drugs 23, no. 8: 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23080318

APA Style

Almeida, M., & Vieira, H. (2025). Marine-Derived Collagen and Chitosan: Perspectives on Applications Using the Lens of UN SDGs and Blue Bioeconomy Strategies. Marine Drugs, 23(8), 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23080318

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop