Next Article in Journal
Ligiamycins A and B, Decalin-Amino-Maleimides from the Co-Culture of Streptomyces sp. and Achromobacter sp. Isolated from the Marine Wharf Roach, Ligia exotica
Next Article in Special Issue
A Novel Peptide Derived from Arca inflata Induces Apoptosis in Colorectal Cancer Cells through Mitochondria and the p38 MAPK Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
Ecotoxicological Impact of the Marine Toxin Palytoxin on the Micro-Crustacean Artemia franciscana
Previous Article in Special Issue
Isoquinoline Alkaloids as Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Inhibitors from a Deep-Sea-Derived Fungus Aspergillus puniceus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 20
Issue 2
10.3390/md20020082
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design, Semisynthesis, Insecticidal and Antibacterial Activities of a Series of Marine-Derived Geodin Derivatives and Their Preliminary Structure–Activity Relationships

by
Rong Chao
1,†,
Gulab Said
1,2,†,
Qun Zhang
1,
Yue-Xuan Qi
3,
Jie Hu
1,3,
Cai-Juan Zheng
4,
Ji-Yong Zheng
3,*,
Chang-Lun Shao
1,2,
Guang-Ying Chen
4 and
Mei-Yan Wei
1,5,*
1
Key Laboratory of Marine Drugs, The Ministry of Education of China, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
2
Department of Chemistry, Women University Swabi, Swabi 23430, Pakistan
3
State Key Laboratory for Marine Corrosion and Protection, Luoyang Ship Material Research Institute (LSMRI), Qingdao 266061, China
4
Key Laboratory of Tropical Medicinal Resource Chemistry of Ministry of Education, Hainan Normal University, Haikou 570100, China
5
College of Food Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Mar. Drugs 2022, 20(2), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/md20020082
Submission received: 28 December 2021 / Revised: 15 January 2022 / Accepted: 15 January 2022 / Published: 18 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Drug Research in China: Selected Papers from the 15-NASMD Conference)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To enhance the biological activity of the natural product geodin (1), isolated from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus sp., a series of new ether derivatives (2–37) was designed and semisynthesized using a high-yielding one-step reaction. In addition, the insecticidal and antibacterial activities of all geodin congeners were evaluated systematically. Most of these derivatives showed better insecticidal activities against Helicoverpa armigera Hübner than 1. In particular, 15 showed potent insecticidal activity with an IC50 value of 89 μM, comparable to the positive control azadirachtin (IC50 = 70 μM). Additionally, 5, 12, 13, 16, 30 and 33 showed strong antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Aeromonas salmonicida with MIC values in the range of 1.15–4.93 μM. The preliminary structure–activity relationships indicated that the introduction of halogenated benzyl especially fluorobenzyl, into 1 and substitution of 4-OH could be key factors in increasing the insecticidal and antibacterial activities of geodin.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera Hübner) is one of the most destructive agricultural pests known. This organism causes severe damage to a wide range of crops, such as cotton, sunflower, okra, tomato, chickpea, maize, potato and cabbage [1,2]. H. armigera is native to Africa, Asia, Europe, and Australasia and has become the most globally widespread species of Helicoverpa [3]. Consequently, H. armigera Hübner is responsible for about two billion dollars in direct economic losses each year [4]. Moreover, it has developed resistance against newer chemistries and conventional insecticides because of the extensive use of these chemical insecticides [5]. With the emergence of resistance in H. armigera Hübner to commercial insecticides, research on new insecticides has become particularly important. Marine natural products (MNPs) continue to play highly significant roles in the pesticide development process and are potential sources of new drugs for treating plant diseases [6,7]. Introducing structural modifications to MNPs is one important strategy for drug development initiatives to improve bioavailability, enhance biological activity and reduce toxicity [8].
During the course of our ongoing research into bioactive compounds from marine-derived fungi [9,10,11,12,13,14,15], a secondary metabolite belonging to the griseofulvin family, geodin (1), was isolated from the soft coral-derived fungus Aspergillus sp. (CHNSCLM-0151), collected from the South China Sea in 2015. Griseofulvin is a classic antifungal agent used clinically for the treatment of dermatomycoses and is an inhibitor of centrosomal clustering of cancer cell lines [16]. Griseofulvin and its analogues have been rigorously studied and some structure–activity relationships (SARs) clearly identified [16,17]. A library of 53 griseofulvin analogues with modifications on the 4, 5, 6, 2′, 3′ and 4′positions have been found to be less bioactive than the parent compound. Notably, a 2′-benzyloxy derivative with low activity against Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton metagrophytes was found to be among the most potent compounds identified against MDA-MB-231 cancer cells [16]. Geodin (1) shares the same grisan backbone as griseofulvin (Figure 1) and displays various interesting biological activities such as antimicrobial, glucose uptake for modulatory (rat adipocytes), fibrinolytic enhancement, antiviral and cytotoxic activities [18,19,20]. Most noteworthy from the current semisynthetic perspective, we have previously noted that geodin (1) exerts weak insecticidal activity [19]. Moreover, the previous study SAR study of 1 demonstrated that the phenolic hydroxyl group is not required for insecticidal activity [19]. In order to enhance the biological activity of 1, 36 new derivatives of geodin (1) were semisynthesized to evaluate insecticidal and antimicrobial activities; using this new panel of analogs, we also have extended SAR knowledge of 1.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

The fungal strain Aspergillus sp. (CHNSCLM-0151) was cultivated in 50 L PDB medium at 28 °C with shaking for one week. Then the fermentation broth was extracted three times with an equal volume of EtOAc. The organic extracts were combined and concentrated under vacuum to afford a dry crude extract (35.7 g). The extract was subjected to vacuum liquid chromatography (VLC) on silica gel and eluted with a stepwise gradient of petroleum ether (PE)–EtOAc to afford six fractions (Fr. 1–Fr. 6). Fr. 5 was applied to reverse phase silica gel column and eluted with MeOH-H2O to obtain seven sub-fractions (Fr. 5-A and Fr. 5-G). Fr. 5-B was then purified with 65% MeOH-H2O to yield compound 1 (2.2 g).
The chemical structure of 1 was elucidated by analysis of NMR data and comparisons with literature [17]. Compound 1 contains an exchangeable proton, two singlet protons, two oxygenated methyl groups and a methyl. The substituents at the 4-OH were semisynthetically modified (Scheme 1) using benzyl bromide at a temperature of 40 °C for 6–12 h in the presence of K2CO3 in dry acetone to produce compounds 2–37 (Figure 1 and Table 1). The structures of these derivatives (2–37) were fully characterized by extensive spectroscopic analyses (Figures S1–S111).

2.2. Insecticidal Activity against Helicoverpa armigera Hübner

In this study, the insecticidal activities against Helicoverpa armigera Hübner of geodin (1) and 36 new derivatives modified at the 4-OH position were assessed. Most derivatives showed better insecticidal activity than marine natural product 1 (Table 2). Most of the derivatives were functionalized with benzyl analogues except for 37 which was modified with only an ethyl group and had no insecticidal activity. Compounds 2–4 and 35 were modified with bromobenzyl moieties and exhibited moderate insecticidal activity with IC50 values of 176 μM (although 4 was inactive). In addition, the introduction of chlorobenzyl groups at the 4-OH position of 1 afforded the analogues 5–9 and 31–34 most of which showed higher insecticidal activity. However, the 2-chlorobenzyl derivative 5, 2-chloro-4-fluorobenzyl derivative 31 and 4-chloro-2-fluorobenzyl derivative 33 displayed lower activity against H. armigera Hübner compared to parent 1. Besides, the iodobenzyl analogues 10 and 11 had no insecticidal activity. Multiple studies have demonstrated that the introduction of a fluorine atom was useful for increasing insecticidal activity because of its unique properties such as electronegativity, size, and electrostatic interactions [21,22,23,24,25]. Herein, 12–21 were modified by fluorinated benzyl and most exhibited stronger activity (16 and 19 were inactive). Especially, 2,3,4,5-tetrafluorobenzyl derivative 15 exhibited potent insecticidal activity comparable with the positive control azadirachtin with an IC50 value of 89 μM (Figure 2). Moreover, the result of the antifouling activity of 15 against Navicula exigua and the settlement of the Mytilus edulis showed inactive and indicated 15 was non-toxic. In addition, non-halogenated benzyl derivatives 22–30 which were modified with nitro, methyl, phenyl and nitrile groups had good insecticidal activity except for 3-methylbenzyl compound 24 and 2-cyanobenzyl compound 30. The above results indicated that the introduction of benzyl especially halogenated benzyl could enhance the insecticidal activity of 1. Strikingly, further research on 15 was worth developing the low-toxicity and high-efficiency insecticide drug.

2.3. Antibacterial Activity

Compounds 1–37 were also tested for their pharmacological activities against three bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus, Aeromonas salmonicida and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Table 2). For S. aureus, 4-bromobenzyl derivative 4 and 3-iodobenzyl derivative 10 showed weak activity with MIC values of 17.60 and 16.25 μM, respectively (positive control ciprofloxacin, MIC = 0.16 μM). The chlorobenzyl analogues 5, 6 and 8 exhibited strong inhibitory activities with MIC values of 4.77, 9.55 and 8.96 μM, respectively. In addition, the introduction of fluorine atom improved the activity (12–20, MIC values: 4.76 to 17.94 μM). The cyanobenzyl derivatives 29 and 30 showed strong inhibitory activities (MIC values of 9.72 and 4.86 μM), while other non-halogenated benzyl derivatives 22–28 were inactive. Moreover, the simultaneous introduction of fluorine and chlorine atoms significantly enhanced antibacterial activity (31–34, MIC values: 4.62 to 9.23 μM) while 4-bromo-2-fluorobenzyl derivative 35 was inactive. At the same time, 2-cyano-5-fluorobenzyl analogue 36 exhibited moderate inhibitory activity with an MIC value of 18.97 μM.
For A. salmonicida, similarly, the introduction of halogenated benzyl strengthened the activity of geodin (1). Almost all of the compounds modified by benzyl groups substituted with fluorine, chlorine, bromine and iodine atoms showed better antibacterial activity than the parent 1. The derivatives 2, 5, 6, 8–10, 13–16, 20, 21, 31, 33 and 35 showed strong inhibitory activities with MIC values in the range of 1.15 to 4.77 μM (Figure 3), while 4, 11, 19 and 32 showed moderate inhibitory activities against A. salmonicida with MIC values ranging from 8.13 to 9.23 μM (positive control Sea-Nine 211, MIC = 0.27 μM). At the same time, the non-halogenated benzyl analogues 26 and 30 also exhibited strong activities with MIC values of 2.29 and 4.86 μM.
Interestingly, the ethyl derivative 37 showed selective inhibitory activity against P. aeruginosa with an MIC value of 5.85 μM and the positive control Sea-Nine 211 had an MIC value of 0.27 μM (Figure 3). The results revealed that the halogenated benzyl modification on 4-OH of geodin (1) improved the antibacterial activity against S. aureus and A. salmonicida. At the same time, the introduction of ethyl on the 4-OH position of geodin showed selective inhibitory activities against P. aeruginosa.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

1H and 13C NMR spectra were measured on an Agilent DD2 NMR spectrometer at 500 MHz and 125 MHz frequencies, respectively. For vacuum column chromatography silica gel (200–300 mesh, Qing Dao Hai Yang Chemical Group Co., Qingdao, China) and silica gel plates for thin layer chromatography (G60, F-254, and Yan Tai Zi Fu Chemical Group Co., Yan Tai, China) were used. HR-ESI-MS spectra were recorded on a Micro-mass Q-TOF spectrometer while UPLCMS spectra were measured on Waters UPLC® system using a C18 column [ACQUITY UPLC® BEH C18, 2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 μm; 0.5 mL/min] and ACQUITY QDA ESIMS scan from 150 to 1000 Da. For reverse phase Octadecylsilyl silica gel column was used. All the derivatives of compound 1 were semisynthesized by one step reaction. The products formation and reaction completion were checked by TLC at various intervals of time.

3.2. Biological Material

Aspergillus sp. (CHNSCLM-0151) was isolated from the inner soft fresh tissue of a soft coral Sinularia sp., collected in 2015 from the coastal depth of the South China Sea. It was identified as Aspergillus sp., on the basis of its morphological and RNA base sequences. The fungus 512 base pair had 98% ITS sequence similarity with Aspergillus sp., NRRL58570 (GenBank No. HQ288052.1). The sequence data have been submitted to GenBank with accession number KY235298. The strain has been stored at the Key Laboratory of Marine Drugs, the Ministry of Education of China, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China.

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

The pure spores of fungal strain were streaked onto PDA plates and incubated at 28 °C for one week. After the growth of fungus, small plugs of PDA containing the spores were aseptically put into 1000 mL Erlenmeyer flasks having about 60 g sterilized rice medium and 2% sodium chloride salt. The flasks were fermented at room temperature for 3 weeks, extracted three times with EtOAc, and evaporated under vacuum. The crude extract was subjected to normal phase silica gel column chromatography (CC) (200–300 mesh), eluting with a linear gradient of PE-EtOAc (v/v, gradient) to afford five fractions (Fr. 1–Fr. 5). Fraction 4 eluted with 40% EtOAc was further subjected to reverse phase silica gel CC, using MeOH and H2O as mobile phase. Compound 1 was eluted with 80% MeOH/H2O and further purified by recrystallization in MeOH/CH2Cl2.

Geodin (1)

White, solid; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.47 (1H, s, OH-4), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.0 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.0 Hz, H-5′), 3.73 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.70 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.57 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 193.4 (C-8), 185.1 (C-4′), 168.0 (C-6′), 165.6 (C-2), 163.5 (C-8′), 149.5 (C-4), 146.7 (C-6), 137.6 (C-3′), 137.0 (C-2′), 114.9 (C-5), 109.6 (C-3), 109.0 (C-1), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.6 (C-1′), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 18.9 (C-7), ESIMS m/z 398.9 [M + H]+.

3.4. General Synthetic Methods for Compounds 2–37

A corresponding benzyl bromide reagent (3–5 eq.) and anhydrous K2CO3 (15 mg) were added to a stirred solution of 1 (40 mg, 0.10 mmol) in dry acetone (20 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at 40 °C for 6–12 h. After the completion of the reaction, water was added to the reaction mixture, then the solution was extracted two times with EtOAc (40 mL). The organic layer was combined and dried under vacuum to give a crude residue which was purified through normal phase silica gel CC (200–300 mesh) eluting with a linear gradient of PE-EtOAc.

3.4.1. Characterization Data of Compounds 2–37

Methyl(R)-4-((2-bromobenzyl)oxy)-5,7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3,4′-dioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexane]-2′,5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (2)

White, solid; yield 88.8%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.76 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.56 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.35 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.20 (1H, t, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.0 Hz, H-3′), 5.82(1H, s, H-5′), 5.45 (1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz), 5.40 (1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.70 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.59 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.5 (C-8), 185.3 (C-4′), 168.4 (C-6′), 167.0 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 151.1 (C-4), 146.1 (C-6), 137.7 (CH), 137.6 (C-3′), 135.9 (C-2′), 132.7 (CH), 130.3 (CH), 129.9 (CH), 127.7 (CH), 123.2 (C), 122.2 (C-5), 113.6 (C-3), 113.3 (C-1), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 76.4 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 566.9614 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H18BrCl2O7+, 566.9607).

Methyl(R)-4-((3-bromobenzyl)oxy)-5,7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3,4′-dioxo-3Hspiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′,5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (3)

White, solid; yield 50.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.68 (1H, s), 7.47 (2H, t, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.23 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.15 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-5′), 5.34 (1H, d, J = 11.2 Hz), 5.25 (1H, d, J = 11.2 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.69 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.59 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.7 (C-8), 185.3 (C-4′), 168.4 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.7 (C-8′), 150.6 (C-4), 146.2 (C-6), 138.5 (C), 137.8 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 131.7 (CH), 131.6 (CH), 130.2 (CH), 127.2 (CH), 122.6 (C), 113.8 (C-5), 113.5 (C-3), 109.0 (C-1), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 75.8 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.3 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 566.9612 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H18BrCl2O7+, 566.9607).

Methyl(R)-4-((4-bromobenzyl)oxy)-5,7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3,4′-dioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexane]-2′,5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (4)

White, solid; yield 72.7%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.48 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.39 (2H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.0 Hz, H-3′), 5.81 (1H, d, J = 1.0 Hz, H-5′), 5.34 (1H, d, J = 11.5 Hz), 5.25 (1H, d, J = 11.5 Hz), 3.74 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.67 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.58 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.7 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.4 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 150.6 (C-4), 146.1 (C-6), 137.7 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 135.2 (C), 131.7 (CH×2), 130.5 (CH×2), 122.7 (C), 122.3 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 113.4 (C-1), 104.4 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 75.9 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 566.9570 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H18BrCl2O7+, 566.9607).

Methyl(R)-5, 7-dichloro-4-((2-chlorobenzyl) oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (5)

White, solid; yield 30.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.75 (1H, dd, J = 7.5, 2.0 Hz), 7.38 (1H, dd, J = 7.5, 2.0 Hz), 7.29 (2H, ddd, J = 7.5, 2.0 Hz), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.0 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.0 Hz, H-5′), 5.48 (1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz), 5.41 (1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.70 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.59 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 190.5 (C-8), 185.3 (C-4′), 168.4 (C-6′), 167.0 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 151.1 (C-4), 146.1 (C-6), 137.8 (C-3′), 137.6 (C-2′), 134.2 (C), 133.5 (CH), 130.4 (CH), 129.7 (CH), 129.5 (CH), 127.1 (C), 122.2 (C-5), 113.6 (C-3), 113.3 (C-1), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.2 (C-1′), 74.1 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 523.0117 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H18Cl3O7+, 523.0113).

Methyl(R)-5, 7-dichloro-4-((3-chlorobenzyl) oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (6)

White, solid; yield 92.3%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.52 (1H, s), 7.43 (1H, m), 7.30 (2H, overlapped), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.3 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.3 Hz, H-5′), 5.35 (1H, d, J = 11.3 Hz), 5.26 (1H, d, J = 11.3 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.69 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.58 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.7 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.4 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 150.6 (C-4), 146.1 (C-6), 138.2 (C-3′), 137.7 (C-2′), 137.5 (C), 134.4 (C), 129.9 (CH), 128.7 (CH×2), 126.7 (CH), 122.2 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 113.5 (C-1), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 75.8 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2(C-9′), 19.1(C-7); HRESIMS m/z 523.0120 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H18Cl3O7+, 523.0113).

Methyl(R)-5,7-dichloro-4-((4-chlorobenzyl)oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3,4′-dioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexane]-2′,5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (7)

White, solid; yield 50.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.46 (2H, d, J = 8.15 Hz), 7.33 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.14 (1H, s, H-3′), 5.81 (1H, s, H-5′), 5.34 (1H, d, J = 11.1 Hz), 5.26 (1H, d, J = 11.1 Hz), 3.74 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.68 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.58 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.7 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.4 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.7 (C-8′), 150.7 (C-4), 146.1 (C-6), 137.8 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 134.7 (C), 134.5 (CH×2), 130.2 (CH×2), 128.8 (C), 122.3 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 113.5 (C-1), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 75.9 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 523.0120 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H18Cl3O7+, 523.0113).

Methyl(R)-5, 7-dichloro-4-((2, 6-dichlorobenzyl) oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (8)

White, solid; yield 71.5%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.34 (1H, d, J = 0.5 Hz), 7.32 (1H, s), 7.23 (1H, ddd, J = 7.4, 1.4 Hz), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-3′), 5.81 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-5′), 5.73 (1H, d, J = 11.5 Hz), 5.66 (1H, d, J = 11.5 Hz), 3.73 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.69 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.55 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.3 (C-8), 185.3 (C-4′), 168.5 (C-6′), 166.9 (C-2), 163.5 (C-8′), 151.6 (C-4), 145.9 (C-6), 137.8 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 137.3 (C), 132.2 (CH), 130.8 (C×2), 128.5 (CH×2), 121.8 (C-5), 113.2 (C-3), 112.9 (C-1), 104.4 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 72.0 (CH2), 57.0 (C-7′), 53.1 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 556.9730 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H17Cl4O7+, 556.9723).

Methyl(R)-5, 7-dichloro-4-((3, 4-dichlorobenzyl) oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (9)

White, solid; yield 94.3%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.61 (1H, d, J = 1.0 Hz), 7.44 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.38 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.0 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.0 Hz, H-5′), 5.33 (1H, d, J = 11.5 Hz), 5.25 (1H, d, J = 11.5 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.69 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.58 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.8 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.3 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.7 (C-8′), 150.3 (C-4), 146.2 (C-6), 137.7 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 136.4 (C), 132.7 (C), 132.6 (CH), 130.6 (CH×2), 128.0 (C), 122.2 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 113.7 (C-1), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 75.1 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 556.9730 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H17Cl4 O7+, 556.9723).

Methyl(R)-5, 7-dichloro-4-((3-iodobenzyl) oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (10)

White, solid; yield 94.1%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.88 (1H, s), 7.66 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.52 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.10 (1H, t, 7.8 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-5′), 5.30 (1H, d, J = 11.2 Hz), 5.21 (1H, d, J = 11.2 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.69 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.58 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.7 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.4 (C-6′), 167.0 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 150.6 (C-4), 146.1 (C-6), 138.5 (C-3′), 137.7 (C-2′), 137.6 (C), 137.5 (CH×2), 130.3 (CH), 127.8 (CH), 122.2 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 113.5 (C-1), 104.5 (C-5′), 94.3 (C), 84.3 (C-1′), 75.7 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 614.9468 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H18Cl2IO7+, 614.9469).

Methyl(R)-5, 7-dichloro-4-((4-iodobenzyl) oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (11)

White, solid; yield 93.7%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.67 (2H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.26 (2H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.13 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-3′), 5.81 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-5′), 5.33 (1H, d, J = 11.3 Hz), 5.24 (1H, d, J = 11.3 Hz), 3.74 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.67 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.58 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ190.7 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.3 (C-6′), 167.0 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 150.6 (C-4), 146.1 (C-6), 137.7 (C-3′), 137.6 (CH×2), 137.5 (C-2′), 135.8 (C), 130.6 (CH×2), 122.2 (C-5), 113.7 (C-3), 113.4 (C-1), 104.4 (C-5′), 94.5 (C), 84.2 (C-1′), 76.0 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 614.9477 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H18Cl2IO7+, 614.9469).

Methyl(R)-5, 7-dichloro-4-((2-fluorobenzyl) oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (12)

White, solid; yield 58.4%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.64 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.32 (1H, m, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.15 (2H, overlapped), 7.06 (1H, t, J = 9.5 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 0.5 Hz, H-5′), 5.44 (1H, d, J = 11 Hz), 5.35 (1H, d, J = 11 Hz), 3.74 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.70 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.57 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.6 (C-8), 185.3 (C-4′), 168.5 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 162.0 (C), 150.9 (C-4), 146.1 (C-6), 137.8 (C-3′), 137.6 (C-2′), 131.3 (C), 130.5 (CH), 124.3 (CH×2), 122.4 (CH), 115.5 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 113.4 (C-1), 104.4 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 70.5 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 507.0413 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H18Cl2FO7+, 507.0408).

Methyl(R)-5, 7 -dichloro-4-((3, 5-difluorobenzyl) oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (13)

White, solid; yield 81.1%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-3′), 7.05 (2H, overlapped), 6.76 (1H, dt, J = 2.2 Hz), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-5′), 5.37 (1H, d, J = 11.7 Hz), 5.28 (1H, d, J = 11.7 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.69 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.58 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.8 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.3 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.7 (C-8′), 162.1(C), 150.2 (C-4), 146.3 (C-6), 140.0 (C-3′), 137.7 (C), 137.5 (C-2′), 122.1 (C), 111.3 (C-5), 111.1 (C-3), 110.1 (C-1), 104.5 (CH), 104.1(CH), 103.9 (CH), 103.7 (C-5′), 84.2 (C-1′), 75.1 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 525.0316 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H17Cl2F2O7+, 525.0314).

Methyl(R)-5, 7-dichloro-4-((3, 4-difluorobenzyl) oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (14)

White, solid; yield 91.2%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.37 (1H, dt, J = 2.0 Hz), 7.25 (1H, m, H-3′), 7.14 (2H, overlapped), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-5′), 5.32 (1H, d, J = 11.0 Hz), 5.23 (1H, d, J = 11.0 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.69 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.58 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.8 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.3 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.7 (C-8′), 150.4 (C-4), 146.2 (C-6), 137.7 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 133.2 (C), 132.7 (C), 125.0 (C), 122.3 (CH), 118.1 (CH), 117.9 (CH), 117.4 (C), 117.3 (C-5), 113.9 (C-3), 113.7 (C-1), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 75.3 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 525.0325 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H17Cl2F2O7+, 525.0314).

Methyl(R)-5, 7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-4-((2, 3, 4, 5-tetrafluorobenzyl) oxy)-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (15)

White, solid; yield 25.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.33 (1H, m), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-3′), 5.83 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-5′), 5.39 (1H, d, J = 11.9 Hz), 5.31 (1H, d, J = 11.9 Hz), 3.76 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.71 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.58 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.8 (C-8), 185.2(C-4′), 168.2 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.7 (C-8′), 149.9 (C-4), 146.3 (C-6), 137.6 (C-3′), 137.6 (C-2′), 137.6 (C), 122.3 (C), 119.9 (C), 116.2 (CH), 114.2 (C), 113.8 (C-5), 112.2 (C-3), 112.0 (C-1), 108.3 (C), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 68.6 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 561.0137 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H15Cl2F4O7+, 561.0125).

Methyl(R)-5,7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-4-((2, 3, 4-trifluorobenzyl)oxy)-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (16)

White, solid; yield 31.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.37 (1H, m), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-3′), 6.97 (1H, m), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-5′), 5.40 (1H, d, J = 11.6 Hz), 5.30 (1H, d, J = 11.6 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.70 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.57 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.8 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.3 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.7 (C-8′), 150.3 (C-4), 146.2 (C-6), 137.7 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 125.1 (C), 122.4 (C), 121.0 (C-5), 113.9 (C-3), 113.9 (C-1), 112.4 (CH), 112.3(C), 112.2(C), 112.2 (CH), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 69.3 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1(C-7); HRESIMS m/z 543.0213 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H16Cl2F3O7+, 543.0220).

Methyl(R)-5,7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-4-((perfluorophenyl) methoxy)-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexane]-2′,5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (17)

White, solid; yield 20.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.13 (1H, d, J = 1.2 Hz, H-3′), 5.81 (1H, d, J = 1.2 Hz, H-5′), 5.55 (1H, d, J = 11.8 Hz), 5.38 (1H, d, J = 11.8 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.70 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.57 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ190.7 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.3 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 149.8 (C-4), 146.2 (C-6), 137.6 (C-3′), 137.6 (C-2′), 135.0 (C), 127.4 (C), 122.4 (C), 117.0 (C), 114.4 (C-5), 114.1 (C-3), 113.9 (C-1), 109.7 (C), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 63.1 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 579.0034 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H14Cl2F5O7+, 579.0031).

Methyl(R)-5, 7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-4-((2-(trifluoromethyl) benzyl) oxy)-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (18)

White, solid; yield 50.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.06 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.66 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.62 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.44 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-5′), 5.48 (2H, q, J = 12.5 Hz), 3.74 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.70 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.60 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.6 (C-8), 185.3 (C-4′), 168.4 (C-6′), 167.0 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 151.0 (C-4), 146.1 (C-6), 137.7 (C-3′), 137.6 (C-2′), 135.0 (C), 132.3 (CH), 130.1 (CH), 128.2 (CH), 125.8 (CH), 125.7 (C), 125.4 (C), 122.1 (C-5), 113.7 (C-3), 113.6 (C-1), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.2 (C-1′), 72.9 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 557.0386 [M + H]+ (calcd for C25H18Cl2F3O7+, 557.0376).

Methyl(R)-5,7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3,4′-dioxo-4-((3-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl) oxy)-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (19)

White, solid; yield 30.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.80 (1H, s), 7.76 (1H, d, J = 7.7 Hz), 7.60 (1H, d, J = 7.7 Hz), 7.50 (1H, t, J = 7.7 Hz), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.3 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.3 Hz, H-5′), 5.40 (1H, d, J = 11.4 Hz), 5.33 (1H, d, J = 11.4 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.69 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.59 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.8 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.4 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.7 (C-8′), 150.6 (C-4), 146.2 (C-6), 137.8 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 137.2 (C), 131.9 (C), 129.1 (CH), 125.4 (CH×3), 122.3 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 113.7 (C-1), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 75.9 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 557.0380 [M + H]+ (calcd for C25H18Cl2F3O7+, 557.0376).

Methyl(R)-5,7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-4-((4-(trifluoromethyl) benzyl) oxy)-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (20)

White, solid; yield 72.7%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.66 (2H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.62 (2H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.3 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.3 Hz, H-5′), 5.44 (1H, d, J = 11.5 Hz), 5.35 (1H, d, J = 11.5 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.68 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.59 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.8 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.3 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.7 (C-8′), 150.6 (C-4), 146.2 (C-6), 140.2 (C), 137.7 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 130.7 (CH), 130.5 (CH), 128.6 (CH×2), 125.5 (C), 122.1 (C-5), 113.7 (C-3), 113.6 (C-1), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 75.7 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 557.0380 [M + H]+ (calcd for C25H18Cl2F3O7+, 557.0376).

Methyl(R)-4-((3, 5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)oxy)-5, 7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (21)

White, solid; yield 66.3%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.03 (2H, s), 7.85 (1H, s), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.3 Hz, H-3′), 5.83 (1H, d, J = 1.3 Hz, H-5′), 5.45 (1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz), 5.40 (1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz), 3.76 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.70 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.59 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.9 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.2 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.8 (C-8′), 150.1 (C-4), 146.3 (C-6), 138.9 (C), 137.7 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 132.0 (C), 131.7 (CH), 128.5 (CH), 124.4 (CH), 122.45 (C), 122.43 (C), 122.3 (C), 122.1 (C-5), 114.1 (C-3), 113.8 (C-1), 104.6 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 74.9 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.3 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 625.0253 [M + H]+ (calcd for C26H17Cl2F6O7+, 625.0250).

Methyl(R)-5,7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-4-((3-nitrobenzyl)oxy)-3,4′-dioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexane]-2′,5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (22)

White, solid; yield 50.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.38 (1H, s), 8.19 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.92 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.56 (1H, t, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.13 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-5′), 5.40 (2H, q, J = 11.6 Hz), 3.76 (s, 3H, H-7′), 3.69 (s, 3H, H-9′), 2.58 (s, 3H, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.9 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.3 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.7 (C-8′), 150.2 (C-4), 148.4 (C-6), 146.3 (C), 138.3 (C), 137.7 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 134.6 (CH), 129.6 (CH), 123.5 (CH), 123.4 (CH), 122.2 (C-5), 113.9 (C-3), 113.8 (C-1), 110.1 (C), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 75.3 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.3 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 534.0367 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H18Cl2NO9+, 534.0353).

Methyl(R)-5,7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-4-((2-methylbenzyl)oxy)-3,4′-dioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexane]-2′,5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (23)

White, solid; yield 50.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.51 (1H, d, J = 7.50 Hz), 7.26 (1H, t, J = 6.2 Hz), 7.20 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.15 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-5′), 5.38 (1H, d, J = 10.8 Hz), 5.30 (1H, d, J = 10.8 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.69 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.58 (3H, s, H-7), 2.49 (3H, s); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.6 (C-8), 185.3 (C-4′), 168.5 (C-6′), 167.0 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 151.3 (C-4), 146.0 (C-6), 137.8 (C-2′), 137.7 (C-3′), 137.5 (C×2), 134.3 (C), 130.4 (C), 130.1 (C), 128.9 (C), 126.1 (C), 122.3 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 113.1 (C-1), 104.4 (C-5′), 84.2 (C-1′), 75.3 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 29.8 (CH3), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 503.0660 [M + H]+ (calcd for C25H21Cl2O7+, 503.0659).

Methyl(R)-5,7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-4-((3-methylbenzyl)oxy)-3,4′-dioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexane]-2′,5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (24)

White, solid; yield 50.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.37 (1H, s), 7.33 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.26 (1H, q, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.15 (2H, Overlapped, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.1 Hz, H-5′), 5.32 (1H, d, J = 10.7 Hz), 5.24 (1H, d, J = 10.7 Hz), 3.74 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.68 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.59 (3H, s, H-7), 2.36 (3H, s); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.6 (C-8), 185.3 (C-4′), 168.5 (C-6′), 167.0 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 151.1 (C-4), 146.0 (C-6), 138.2 (C-2′), 137.8 (C-3′), 137.5 (C), 136.1 (C), 129.5 (CH), 129.4 (CH), 128.5 (CH), 125.8 (CH), 122.4 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 113.2 (C-1), 104.4 (C-5′), 84.2 (C-1′), 77.0 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 21.5 (CH3), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 503.0664 [M + H]+ (calcd for C25H21Cl2O7+, 503.0659).

Methyl(R)-5,7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-4-((4-methylbenzyl)oxy)-3,4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexane]-2′,5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (25)

White, solid; yield 50.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.40 (2H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.16 (2H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.2 Hz, H-3′), 5.81 (1H, d, J = 1.2 Hz, H-5′), 5.29 (2H, q, J = 10.7 Hz), 3.73 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.67 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.57 (3H, s, H-7), 2.34 (3H, s); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.6 (C-8), 185.3 (C-4′), 168.5 (C-6′), 167.0 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 151.1 (C-4), 146.0 (C-6), 138.4 (C-2′), 137.8 (C-3′), 137.5 (C), 133.2 (C), 131.7 (CH), 130.5 (CH), 129.2 (CH), 128.9 (CH), 122.4 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 113.1 (C-1), 104.4 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 75.9 (CH2), 57.1(C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 21.4 (CH3), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 503.0663 [M + H]+ (calcd for C25H21Cl2O7+, 503.0659).

Methyl(R)-4-((4-(tert-butyl)benzyl) oxy)-5, 7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (26)

White, solid; yield 42.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.48 (2H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.39 (2H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.15 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-5′), 5.33 (1H, d, J = 10.7 Hz), 5.25 (1H, d, J = 10.7 Hz), 3.73 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.67 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.59 (3H, s, H-7), 1.32 (9H, overlapped); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.6 (C-8), 185.3 (C-4′), 168.5 (C-6′), 167.0 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 151.6 (C-4), 151.2 (C), 146.0 (C-6), 137.8 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 133.3 (C), 128.5 (CH×2), 125.5 (CH×2), 122.4 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 113.1 (C-1), 104.4 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 76.8 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 34.7(C), 31.4 (CH3×3), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 545.1131[M + H]+ (calcd for C28H27 Cl2O7+, 545.1128).

Methyl(R)-4-([1,1′-biphenyl]-4-ylmethoxy)-5,7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3,4′-dioxo-3H-spiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexane]-2′,5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (27)

White, solid; yield 81.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.61 (6H, overlapped), 7.44 (2H, t, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.35 (1H, dt, J = 7.3, 1.2 Hz), 7.16 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-5′), 5.43 (1H, d, J = 10.9 Hz), 5.34 (1H, d, J = 10.9 Hz), 3.74 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.67 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.60 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.6 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.4 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 151.0 (C-4), 146.0 (C-6), 141.5 (C), 140.8 (C), 137.8 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 135.2 (C), 129.2 (CH×2), 128.9 (CH×2), 127.5 (CH), 127.3 (CH×2), 127.2 (CH×2), 122.4 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 113.3 (C-1), 104.4 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 76.6 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 565.0816 [M + H]+ (calcd for C30H23Cl2O7+, 565.0815).

Methyl(R)-5,7-dichloro-4-((2′-cyano-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)methoxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (28)

White, solid; yield 32.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.76 (1H, dd, J = 7.7, 1.0 Hz), 7.69 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.65 (1H, ddd, J = 7.7, 1.0 Hz), 7.58 (2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.51 (1H, d, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.45 (1H, ddd, J = 7.6, 1.0 Hz), 7.15 (1H, d, J = 1.2 Hz, H-3′), 5.83 (1H, d, J = 1.2 Hz, H-5′), 5.43 (2H, q, J = 11.1 Hz), 5.34 (2H, q, J = 11.1 Hz), 3.75 (s, 3H, H-7′), 3.70 (s, 3H, H-9′), 2.60 (s, 3H, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.7 (C-8), 185.3 (C-4′), 168.5 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.7 (C-8′), 151.0 (C-4), 146.2 (C-6), 145.2 (C), 138.4 (C), 137.8 (C-3′), 137.6 (C-2′), 136.9 (C), 133.9 (C), 133.0 (CH), 130.2 (CH), 129.0 (CH×2), 129.0 (CH×2), 127.8 (CH), 122.4 (CH), 118.8 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 113.4 (C-1), 111.4 (C), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 76.4 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 590.0770 [M + H]+ (calcd for C31H22Cl2NO7+, 590.0768).

Methyl(R)-5, 7-dichloro-4-((2-cyanobenzyl) oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (29)

White, solid; yield 87.7%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.90 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.68 (1H, dd, J = 7.5, 1.0 Hz), 7.64 (1H, ddd, J = 7.5, 1.0 Hz), 7.44 (1H, ddd, J = 7.5, 1.0 Hz), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.0 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-5′), 5.47 (2H, q, J = 12.0 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.70 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.59 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.7 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.3 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 150.5 (C-4), 146.2 (C-6), 139.6 (C), 137.6 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 133.1 (C), 132.8 (CH), 129.9 (CH), 129.0 (CH), 122.4 (CH), 117.1 (C-5), 113.9 (C-3), 113.7 (C-9), 111.9 (C), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 74.0 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 514.0456 [M + H]+ (calcd for C25H18Cl2NO7+, 514.0455).

Methyl(R)-5, 7-dichloro-4-((4-cyanobenzyl) oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (30)

White, solid; yield 85.3%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.66 (4H, overlapped), 7.13 (1H, d, J = 1.3 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.3 Hz, H-5′), 5.41 (1H, d, J = 11.9Hz), 5.33 (1H, d, J = 11.9Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.69 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.59 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.8 (C-8), 185.1 (C-4′), 168.2 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.7 (C-8′), 150.3 (C-4), 146.3 (C-6), 141.5 (C), 137.7 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 132.4 (CH×2), 128.8 (CH×2), 122.1 (C), 118.8 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 113.7(C-1), 112.3 (C), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 75.5 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 514.0460 [M + H]+ (calcd for C25H18Cl2NO7+, 514.0455).

Methyl(R)-5,7-dichloro-4-((2-chloro-4-fluorobenzyl)oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (31)

White, solid; yield 77.6%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.72 (1H, dd, J = 6.2, 2.3 Hz), 7.14 (2H, overlapped), 7.01 (1H, ddd, J = 8.5, 2.4 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.0 Hz, H-5′), 5.42 (1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz), 5.35(1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.70 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.58 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.7 (C-8) 185.2 (C-4′), 168.4 (C-6′), 167.0 (C-2), 163.7 (C-8′), 161.6(C), 150.8 (C-4), 146.1(C-6), 137.7(C-3′), 137.6 (C-2′), 132.0 (CH), 122.3 (C), 117.0 (CH), 116.8(C), 114.4 (C), 114.2 (C-5), 113.7 (C-3), 113.6 (C-1), 104.5 (C-5′), 73.4 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 541.0029 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H17Cl3FO7+, 541.0018).

Methyl(R)-5, 7-dichloro-4-((3-chloro-4-fluorobenzyl) oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (32)

White, solid; yield 78.5%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (1H, dd, J = 7.0, 1.5 Hz), 7.42 (1H, m), 7.13 (2H, overlapped, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 0.5 Hz, H-5′), 5.29 (1H, d, J = 11.0 Hz), 5.23 (1H, d, J = 11.0 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.69 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.58 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.7 (C-8), 185.1 (C-4′), 168.2 (C-6′), 167.0 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 157.1 (C), 150.2 (C-4), 146.1 (C-6), 137.6 (C-3′), 137.4 (C-2′), 133.1 (C), 128.6 (CH×2), 122.2 (CH), 116.7 (C), 116.5 (C-5), 113.7 (C-3), 113.6 (C-1), 104.4 (C-5′), 84.2 (C-1′), 75.1 (CH2), 57.0 (C-7′), 53.1 (C-9′), 19.0 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 541.0031[M + H]+ (calcd for C24H17Cl3FO7+, 541.0018).

Methyl(R)-5, 7-dichloro-4-((3-chloro-2-fluorobenzyl) oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (33)

White, solid; yield 94.5%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.57 (1H, t, J = 6.5 Hz), 7.38 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.14 (1H, s, H-3′), 7.10 (1H, t, J = 8.0 Hz), 5.82 (1H, s, H-5′), 5.45 (1H, d, J = 11.5 Hz), 5.34 (1H, d, J = 11.5 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.70 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.58 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 190.7 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.4 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 157.4 (C), 155.4 (C), 150.6 (C-4), 146.2 (C-6), 137.7 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 131.0 (C), 129.4 (CH×2), 124.8 (CH), 124.7 (CH), 122.4 (C-5), 113.8(C-3), 113.7 (C-1), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 70.1 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 541.0021[M + H]+ (calcd for C24H17Cl3FO7+, 541.0018).

Methyl(R)-5, 7-dichloro-4-((4-chloro-2-fluorobenzyl) oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (34)

White, solid; yield 72.4%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.58 (1H, t, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.15 (2H, dd, J = 9.5, 1.5 Hz), 7.10 (1H, dd, J = 9.5, 1.5 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.2 Hz, H-5′), 5.39 (1H, d, J = 11.6 Hz), 5.30 (1H, d, J = 11.6 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.69 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.57 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 190.7 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.4 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.7 (C-8′), 150.5 (C-4), 146.1 (C-6), 137.7 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 132.1 (CH), 132.1 (C), 124.8 (CH), 124.7 (C),122.4 (C), 116.4 (CH), 116.2 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 113.7 (C-1), 104.5 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 69.7 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 541.0023 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H17Cl3FO7+, 541.0018).

Methyl(R)-4-((4-bromo-2-fluorobenzyl) oxy)-5,7-dichloro-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (35)

White, solid; yield 52.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.52 (1H, t, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.30 (1H, dd, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz), 7.25 (1H, dd, J = 8.0, 2.0 Hz), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-3′), 5.82 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-5′), 5.38 (1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz), 5.29 (1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz), 3.75 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.69 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.57 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.7 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.3 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 161.7 (C), 159.7 (C), 150.5 (C-4), 146.1 (C-6), 137.7 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 132.3 (C), 127.7 (CH), 122.4 (CH), 119.3 (CH), 119.1 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 113.7 (C-1), 104.5 (C-5′) 84.3 (C-1′), 69.7 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 584.9522 [M + H]+ (calcd for C24H17BrCl2FO7+, 584.9513).

Methyl(R)-5, 7-dichloro-4-((2-cyano-5-fluorobenzyl) oxy)-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3, 4′-dioxo-3H-spiro [benzofuran-2, 1′-cyclohexane]-2′, 5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (36)

White solid; yield 60.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.67 (2H, m), 7.14 (2H, ddd, J = 9.2, 1.3 Hz, H-3′), 5.83 (1H, d, J = 1.3 Hz, H-5′), 5.47 (2H, q, J = 12.8 Hz), 3.76 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.71 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.60 (3H, s, H-7); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.8 (C-8), 185.2 (C-4′), 168.2 (C-6′), 167.1 (C-2), 166.3 (C-8′), 163.7 (C), 150.1 (C-4), 146.3 (C-6), 137.6 (C-3′), 137.6 (C-2′), 135.1 (C), 135.1 (CH), 122.3 (CH), 117.2 (CH), 117.0 (C), 116.6 (C), 116.3 (C-5), 114.3 (C-3), 113.8 (C-1), 104.6 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 73.2 (CH2), 57.2 (C-7′), 53.3 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 532.0361 [M + H]+ (calcd for C25H17Cl2FNO7+, 532.0361).

Methyl(R)-5,7-dichloro-4-ethoxy-6′-methoxy-6-methyl-3,4′-dioxo3Hspiro[benzofuran-2,1′-cyclohexane]-2′,5′-diene-2′-carboxylate (37)

White, solid; yield 85.0%; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.12 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-3′), 5.80 (1H, s, H-5′), 4.34 (2H, dq, J = 7.0 Hz), 3.73 (3H, s, H-7′), 3.68 (3H, s, H-9′), 2.58 (3H, s, H-7), 1.43 (3H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 190.4 (C-8), 185.3 (C-4′), 168.6 (C-6′), 167.0 (C-2), 163.6 (C-8′), 151.6 (C-4), 145.8 (C-6), 137.9 (C-3′), 137.5 (C-2′), 122.3 (C-5), 113.8 (C-3), 112.9 (C-1), 104.4 (C-5′), 84.3 (C-1′), 71.9 (CH2), 57.1 (C-7′), 53.2 (C-9′), 19.1 (C-7), 15.6 (CH3); HRESIMS m/z 427.0349 [M + H]+ (calcd for C19H17Cl2O7+, 427.0346).

3.5. Insecticidal Activity

The neonate larvae of Helicoverpa armigera Hübner were used to assess the insecticidal activity. The positive control was azadirachtin and DMSO was the negative control. Serial dilutions of the tested compounds were added alongside the positive control at 200, 100, 50, 25 and 12.5 μL/well with three replicates per treatment to the artificial diet for the newly hatched larvae while bioassay diet was placed into the six-well plates. New larvae were hatched at 25 °C and relative humidity of 80%. The number of dead larvae was recorded after treatments for 2, 4, 6 and 8 days [26].

3.6. Antibacterial Activity

The methods described by Fromtling et al. were used for the evaluation of antibacterial activities [27]. Ciprofloxacin and sea-nine 211 were used as positive controls. Bacterial species were cultured at 37 °C for 8 h in LB medium and diluted to 106 cfu/mL, using 96-well microplates, having 2 μL test sample and 198 μL of bacterial solutions. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h while DMSO was used as the negative control.

4. Conclusions

In summary, 36 new derivatives of marine-derived geodin (1) were semisynthesized successfully via one mild step reaction with high yields. Among them, 15 showed significant insecticidal activity equivalent to the positive drug, azadirachtin. Meanwhile, 37 showed selective antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa. The results revealed that modification of the 4-OH and introduction of halogen atoms, especially fluorine and chlorine atoms, could enhance the insecticidal and antibacterial activities of 1. These findings bring further evidence that geodin derivatives are active and provide new information supporting the importance of continued studies into the structure–activity relationships of griseofulvin analogs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/md20020082/s1, Figures S1–S112: 1H, 13C-NMR and HRESIMS data and charts of all compounds.

Author Contributions

R.C., G.S. and Q.Z. contributed to extraction, isolation, identification, semisynthesis and manuscript preparation; Y.-X.Q. and J.H. contributed to investigation; C.-L.S. contributed to NMR analysis and structure elucidation; G.-Y.C. and C.-J.Z. contributed to biological evaluation; J.-Y.Z. and M.-Y.W. were the project leaders organizing and guiding the experiments and manuscript writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. U1706210, 41776141 and 41322037), the 2021 Provincial Postdoctoral Innovation Project (Shandong) (No. 862105033029), the Qingdao Postdoctoral Applied Research Project (No. 862105040001), the Research Fund of State Key Laboratory for Marine Corrosion and Protection of Luoyang Ship Material Research Institute (LSMRI) [No. KF190402], Key Laboratory of Tropical Medicinal Resource Chemistry of Ministry of Education, Hainan Normal University (RDZH2021003) and the Taishan Scholars Program, China (No. tsqn20161010).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article or Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yao, S.Y.; Yang, Y.; Xue, Y.Y.; Zhao, W.L.; Liu, X.G.; Du, M.F.; Yin, X.M.; Guan, R.B.; Wei, J.Z.; An, S.H. New insights on the effects of spinosad on the development of Helicoverpa armigera. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2021, 221, 112452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rahimi, V.; Hajizadeh, J.; Zibaee, A.; Sendi, J.J. Effect of polygonum persicaria (polygonales: Polygonaceae) extracted agglutinin on life table and antioxidant responses in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. J. Econ. Entomol. 2018, 111, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jones, M.C.; Parry, H.; Tay, T.W.; Reynolds, R.D.; Chapman, W.J. Movement ecology of pest Helicoverpa: Implications for ongoing spread. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2019, 64, 277–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Yuan, X.L.; Wang, X.F.; Xu, K.; Li, W.; Chen, D.; Zhang, P. Characterization of a new insecticidal anthraquinone derivative from an endophyte of Acremonium vitellinum against Helicoverpa armigera. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 11480–11487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bilal, M.; Freed, S.; Ashraf, Z.M.; Syed Muhammad Zaka, M.S.; Khan, B.M. Activity of acetylcholinesterase and acid and alkaline phosphatases in different insecticide-treated Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 22903–22910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Newman, J.D.; Cragg, M.G. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 770–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, T.N.; Li, L.; Zhou, Y.N.; Lu, A.D.; Li, H.Y.; Chen, J.X.; Duan, Z.Y.; Wang, Q.M. Structural simplification of marine natural products: Discovery of hamacanthin derivatives containing indole and piperazinone as novel antiviral and anti-phytopathogenic-fungus agents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 10093–10103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, L.; Zou, J.Y.; Xu, C.J.; You, S.Y.; Li, Y.Q.; Wang, Q.M. Synthesis and anti-tobacco mosaic virus/fungicidal/insecticidal/antitumor bioactivities of natural product hemigossypol and its derivatives. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 1224–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shao, C.L.; Wu, H.X.; Wang, C.Y.; Liu, Q.A.; Xu, Y.; Wei, M.Y.; Qian, P.Y.; Gu, Y.C.; Zheng, C.J.; She, Z.G.; et al. Potent antifouling resorcylic acid lactones from the gorgonian-derived fungus Cochliobolus lunatus. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 629–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jia, Y.L.; Wei, M.Y.; Chen, H.Y.; Guan, F.F.; Wang, C.Y.; Shao, C.L. (+)- and (−)-Pestaloxazine A, a pair of antiviral enantiomeric alkaloid dimers with a symmetric spiro[oxazinane-piperazinedione] skeleton from Pestalotiopsis sp. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 4216–4219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hou, X.M.; Li, Y.Y.; Shi, Y.W.; Fang, Y.W.; Chao, R.; Gu, Y.C.; Wang, C.Y.; Shao, C.L. Integrating molecular networking and 1h nmr to target the isolation of chrysogeamides from a library of marine-derived Penicillium fungi. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 1228–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hou, X.M.; Liang, T.M.; Guo, Z.Y.; Wang, C.Y.; Shao, C.L. Discovery, absolute assignments, and total synthesis of asperversiamides A–C and their potent activity against Mycobacterium marinum. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 1104–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chao, R.; Hou, X.M.; Xu, W.F.; Hai, Y.; Wei, M.Y.; Wang, C.Y.; Gu, Y.C.; Shao, C.L. Targeted isolation of asperheptatides from a coral-derived fungus using LC-MS/MS-based molecular networking and antitubercular activities of modified cinnamate derivatives. J. Nat. Prod. 2021, 84, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hai, Y.; Wei, M.Y.; Wang, C.Y.; Gu, Y.C.; Shao, C.L. The intriguing chemistry and biology of sulfur-containing natural products from marine microorganisms (1987–2020). Mar. Life Sci. Technol. 2021, 3, 488–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, W.F.; Wu, N.N.; Wu, Y.W.; Qi, Y.X.; Wei, M.Y.; Pineda, M.L.; Ng, G.M.; Spadafora, C.; Zheng, J.Y.; Lu, L.; et al. Structure modification, antialgal, antiplasmodial, and toxic evaluations of a series of new marine-derived 14-membered resorcylic acid lactone derivatives. Mar. Life Sci. Technol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rønnest, H.M.; Rebacz, B.; Markworth, L.; Terp, H.A.; Larsen, O.T.; Krämer, A.; Clausen, H.M. Synthesis and Structure-activity relationship of griseofulvin analogues as inhibitors of centrosomal clustering in cancer cells. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 3342–3347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gulab, S.; Mou, X.F.; Fang, Y.W.; Liang, T.M.; Wei, M.Y.; Chen, G.Y.; Shao, C.L. Secondary metabolites isolated from the soft coral-derived fungus Aspergillus sp. from the South China Sea. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2018, 54, 547–549. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rinderknecht, H.; Ward, J.L.; Bergel, F.; Morrison, A.L. Studies on antibiotic II Bacteriological activity and posiible mode of action of certain nonnitrogenouse natural and synthetic antibiotics. J. Biochem. 1947, 41, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sato, S.; Okusa, N.; Ogawa, A.; Ikenoue, T.; Seki, T.; Tsuji, T. Identification and preliminary SAR studies of (+) geodin as a glucose uptake stimulator for rat adipocytes. J. Antibiot. 2005, 58, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Shinohara, C.; Chikanishi, T.; Nakashima, S.; Hashimoto, A.; Hamanaka, A.; Endo, A.; Hasumi, K. Enhancement of Fibrinolytic Activity of Vascular Endothelial Cells by Chaetoglobosin A, Crinipellin B, Geodin and Triticone B. J. Antibiot. 2000, 53, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zou, X.Z.; Qiu, Z.X. Syntheses of 4-methoxymethylbenzyl permethrinates containing fluorine and their insecticidal activity. J. Fluor. Chem. 2002, 116, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, Y.W.; Li, Y.X.; Pan, L.; Liu, J.B.; Wan, Y.Y.; Chen, W.; Xiong, L.X.; Yang, N.; Song, H.B. Synthesis, insecticidal activities and SAR of novel phthalamides targeting calcium channel. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 6366–6379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, Y.Y.; Gao, L.; Li, H.G.; Sun, P.W.; Meng, F.F.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, Y.T.; Sun, B.Q.; Zhou, S.; Ma, Y.; et al. Synthesis, insecticidal activities, and structure–activity relationship of phenylpyrazole derivatives containing a fluoro-substituted benzene moiety. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 11282–11289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guo, Y.; Yan, Y.Y.; Yu, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhi, X.Y.; Hu, Y.; Xu, H. Synthesis and insecticidal activity of some novel fraxinellone-based esters. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 7016–7021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, Q.L.; Cai, J.L.; Zhao, F.H.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Yang, D.Y.; Qin, Z.H. Synthesis and insecticidal activity of the fluorinated galegine analogues. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 35, 5773–5777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bai, M.; Zheng, C.J.; Huang, G.L.; Mei, R.Q.; Wang, B.; Luo, Y.P.; Zheng, C.; Niu, Z.G.; Chen, G.Y. Bioactive meroterpenoids and isocoumarins from the mangrove-derived fungus Penicillium sp. TGM112. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 1155–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fromtling, R.A.; Galgiani, J.N.; Pfaller, M.A.; Espinel-Ingroff, A.; Bartizal, K.F.; Bartlett, M.S.; Body, B.A.; Frey, C.; Hall, G.; Roberts, G.D.; et al. Multicenter evaluation of a broth macrodilution antifungal susceptibility test for yeasts. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1993, 37, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Marinedrugs 20 00082 g001 550
Figure 1. The structures of griseofulvin and geodin (1) which share the same grisan backbone (rings A, B and C).
Figure 1. The structures of griseofulvin and geodin (1) which share the same grisan backbone (rings A, B and C).
Marinedrugs 20 00082 g001
Marinedrugs 20 00082 sch001 550
Scheme 1. General semisynthetic strategy employed to make ether derivatives of 1.
Scheme 1. General semisynthetic strategy employed to make ether derivatives of 1.
Marinedrugs 20 00082 sch001
Marinedrugs 20 00082 g002 550
Figure 2. The derivative 15 with significant insecticidal activity.
Figure 2. The derivative 15 with significant insecticidal activity.
Marinedrugs 20 00082 g002
Marinedrugs 20 00082 g003 550
Figure 3. The selective derivatives with strong antibacterial activities.
Figure 3. The selective derivatives with strong antibacterial activities.
Marinedrugs 20 00082 g003
Table
Table 1. Structures of compounds 2–37.
Table 1. Structures of compounds 2–37.
No.RNo.RNo.R
2 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i00114 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i00226 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i003
3 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i00415 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i00527 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i006
4 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i00716 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i00828 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i009
5 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i01017 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i01129 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i012
6 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i01318 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i01430 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i015
7 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i01619 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i01731 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i018
8 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i01920 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i02032 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i021
9 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i02221 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i02333 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i024
10 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i02522 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i02634 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i027
11 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i02823 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i02935 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i030
12 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i03124 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i03236 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i033
13 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i03425 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i03537 Marinedrugs 20 00082 i036
Table
Table 2. Insecticidal and antibacterial activities of compounds 1–37 a.
Table 2. Insecticidal and antibacterial activities of compounds 1–37 a.
No.IC50 (μM) (μg/mL)MIC (μM)
Insecticidal ActivityAntimicrobial Activity
H. armigera HübnerS. aureusA. salmonicidaP. aeruginosa
1500 (200)>50>50>50
2176 (100)>502.20>50
3176 (100)>50>50>50
4>350 (>200)17.608.80>50
5>381 (>200)4.774.77>50
6190 (100)9.554.77>50
7190 (100)>50>50>50
8179 (100)8.964.48>50
9179 (100)>504.48>50
10>325 (>200)16.254.06>50
11>325 (>200)>508.13>50
12197 (100)4.932.46>50
13190 (100)4.761.19>50
14190 (100)9.522.38>50
1589 (50)8.912.23>50
16>368 (>200)4.601.15>50
17172 (100)17.27>50>50
18179 (100)8.97>50>50
19>358 (>200)17.948.97>50
20179 (100)17.944.49>50
21>319 (>200)>504.00>50
22187 (100)>50>50>50
23198 (100)>50>50>50
24>397 (>200)>50>50>50
25nt>50>50>50
26366 (200)>502.29>50
27176 (100)>50>50>50
28169 (100)>50>50>50
29>388 (>200)9.72>50>50
30194 (100)4.864.86>50
31>369 (>200)9.234.62>50
32184 (100)9.239.23>50
33>369 (>200)4.622.31>50
34369 (200)9.23>50>50
35170 (100)>504.27>50
36>375 (>200)18.97>50>50
37>468 (>200)>50>505.85
Azadirachtin70 (50)ntntnt
Sea-Nine 211ntnt0.270.27
Ciprofloxacinnt0.16ntnt
nt = not tested. a Results are the average of three independent experiments, each performed in duplicate. Standard deviations were less than ±10%.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chao, R.; Said, G.; Zhang, Q.; Qi, Y.-X.; Hu, J.; Zheng, C.-J.; Zheng, J.-Y.; Shao, C.-L.; Chen, G.-Y.; Wei, M.-Y. Design, Semisynthesis, Insecticidal and Antibacterial Activities of a Series of Marine-Derived Geodin Derivatives and Their Preliminary Structure–Activity Relationships. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20020082

AMA Style

Chao R, Said G, Zhang Q, Qi Y-X, Hu J, Zheng C-J, Zheng J-Y, Shao C-L, Chen G-Y, Wei M-Y. Design, Semisynthesis, Insecticidal and Antibacterial Activities of a Series of Marine-Derived Geodin Derivatives and Their Preliminary Structure–Activity Relationships. Marine Drugs. 2022; 20(2):82. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20020082

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chao, Rong, Gulab Said, Qun Zhang, Yue-Xuan Qi, Jie Hu, Cai-Juan Zheng, Ji-Yong Zheng, Chang-Lun Shao, Guang-Ying Chen, and Mei-Yan Wei. 2022. "Design, Semisynthesis, Insecticidal and Antibacterial Activities of a Series of Marine-Derived Geodin Derivatives and Their Preliminary Structure–Activity Relationships" Marine Drugs 20, no. 2: 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20020082

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop