Next Article in Journal
Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Orally Administered Monostroma nitidum Rhamnan Sulfate against Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Damage to Mouse Organs and Vascular Endothelium
Next Article in Special Issue
New Sorbicillinoids with Tea Pathogenic Fungus Inhibitory Effect from Marine-Derived Fungus Hypocrea jecorina H8
Previous Article in Journal
Possible Functional Roles of Patellamides in the Ascidian-Prochloron Symbiosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bacillimidazoles A−F, Imidazolium-Containing Compounds Isolated from a Marine Bacillus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Tetrahydrofuran Motif in Polyketide Marine Drugs

Department of Organic Chemistry, Campus Miguel Delibes, University of Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2022, 20(2), 120; https://doi.org/10.3390/md20020120
Submission received: 2 January 2022 / Revised: 20 January 2022 / Accepted: 1 February 2022 / Published: 3 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heterocyclic Compounds from Marine Organisms)

Abstract

:
Oxygen heterocycles are units that are abundant in a great number of marine natural products. Among them, marine polyketides containing tetrahydrofuran rings have attracted great attention within the scientific community due to their challenging structures and promising biological activities. An overview of the most important marine tetrahydrofuran polyketides, with a focused discussion on their isolation, structure determination, approaches to their total synthesis, and biological studies is provided.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The ocean is the biggest ecosystem of our planet. Plenty of organisms live in the ocean, and new species are discovered every year. As well, being the oldest ecosystem, marine organisms have evolved for a longer time than terrestrial living beings, and thus have different and sometimes better mechanisms of defense. These are represented by specific compounds, like toxins found in fish and algae and other bioactive substances found in sponges or tunicates. Usually, the real producers of these compounds are microorganisms such as bacteria, cyanobacteria, or dinoflagellates. The interesting properties of some of these metabolites have attracted the attention of the scientific community. As they are usually scarce and difficult to obtain in large amounts, total synthesis has emerged in the last decades as a necessary tool to tackle this problem. It has helped to clarify the structure of some intriguing compounds, and to obtain higher amounts of them in order to perform proper biological studies. Total synthesis is still a crucial tool, as even with today’s advanced NMR techniques, misassignment of the structure of biologically relevant macrolides is a common issue [1].
Polyketides are a diverse class of metabolites, comprising linear as well as macrolide compounds with a range of biological activities. Some of them have promising potential as drug candidates [2]. Common sources of this class of compounds are dinoflagellates of the genus Amphidinium [3]. To understand how to access the macrolide core present in these and other structures within natural products, we encourage the reader to review general macrolactonization methods [4].
On the other hand, oxygenated heterocycles are common motifs in marine bioactive compounds, and therefore the development of methods for their synthesis also requires attention. The most common are six-membered oxacycles, tetrahydropyrans, and thus numerous works focus on their synthesis [5,6]. Oxepanes and tetrahydrofurans also appear in a very large number of marine natural products with interesting properties. Oxepane-containing marine compounds were recently reviewed by our group [7]. Total syntheses of marine and non-marine products containing 2,3,5-trisubstituted tetrahydrofurans (such as kumausallene or petromyroxol) have been recently reviewed by Fernandes [8,9].
Continuing our interest for marine heterocyclic compounds, here we provide an overview, from 2013 to October 2021, of tetrahydrofuran-containing marine polyketides. The compilation of literature on THF-containing macrolides up to 2012 was covered in an excellent review [10]. Macrolides is such a fertile field that some particular families of compounds have already been reviewed, such as haterumalides and biselides [11], or more recently, mandelalides [12]. In recent years, numerous synthetic approaches to the polyketide family continue to emerge, and here we offer an overview of them.

2. Polyketide Marine Drugs Containing Tetrahydrofuran Rings

2.1. Macrolides

Marine invertebrates, such as sponges, algae or dinoflagellate, are a source of a large number of secondary metabolites with relevant biological activities. Within them marine polyketide macrolides have attracted high attention, due to their biological properties and pharmacological potential. Consequently, the development of new synthetic approaches to study their properties has been the goal of many researchers [10,13].

2.1.1. Amphidinolides

Amphidinolides belong to the macrolide family and more than forty members have been isolated from marine dinoflagellates of the genus Amphidinium sp. In the last thirty years. Within these structurally rich compounds, only a few contain tetrahydrofuran units embedded in the macrolactone ring. The studies published in the literature about tetrahydrofuran-containing amphidinolides up to 2013 have been already reviewed by Álvarez and coworkers [10].

Amphidinolides C and F

Amphidinolides C (1), C2 (2), C3 (3), and F (4) are structurally similar (Figure 1), bearing a complex 25-membered macrolide core, which contains 11 chiral carbons and a functionalized side chain. The nature of this chain drastically affects biological activity. Amphidinolide C, which possesses an (S)-hydroxyl group, is active against murine lymphoma L1210 (IC50 = 5.8 ng/mL) and human epidermoid carcinoma KB cell lines (IC50 = 4.6 ng/mL). Strikingly, compounds 2-4 are three orders of magnitude less toxic to the same cell lines.
In 2016, a new amphidinolide C4 (5) was isolated from octocoral Stragulum bicolor (Figure 2). Toxicity was tested against the colon adenocarcinoma cell line HCT-116, finding an IC50 of 10.3 μM. Compound 5 is therefore surprisingly inactive, although it contains a hydroxyl group in the side chain [14].
The interesting biological properties of these compounds have attracted the attention of different authors who have described either total syntheses [15,16] or synthetic approaches to various molecular fragments [17,18,19]. For instance, Fürstner and coworkers took advantage of the structural similarity of 1 and 4 to perform an elegant total synthesis of both compounds [15]. In these syntheses, the formation of the trisubstituted tetrahydrofuran unit was performed using a TBAF-mediated oxa-Michael addition, which selectively led to the desired 1,4-trans tetrahydrofuran ring 7. Parallelly, a chemoselective cobalt-catalyzed cyclization of an appropriate bishomoallylic alcohol 8 provided the required trans-disubstituted tetrahydrofuran 9 (Scheme 1).

Amphidinolide E

Amphidinolide E (10) presents a 19-membered macrolactone ring, bearing a tetrahydrofuran moiety and eight stereocenters (Figure 3).
Total syntheses of 10 have already been developed by Lee [20,21] and Roush [22,23,24]. Recently, Vilarrasa and Costa presented a different approach to its total synthesis. Though no significant improvement was made in terms of yield or number of steps, this work provides interesting insights into Julia-Kocienski olefinations [25]. Thus, epoxidation of alcohol 11 directly afforded tetrahydrofuran 12, through a tandem epoxidation-cyclization reaction. Subsequent Swern oxidation, followed by Julia-Kocienski reaction with sulfone 13, provided the northern C10–C21 fragment of amphidinolide E (Scheme 2).

Amphidinolide K

Amphidinolide K (15) (Figure 4) has also a 19-membered macrolactone, but with a simpler side chain. Regarding its biological properties, amphidinolide K has shown a strong stabilizing effect on actin filaments (F-actin).
Vilarrasa proposed a total synthesis of 15 relying on a Hosomi-Sakurai reaction as a key step [26]. The tetrahydrofuran ring 17 was formed by cyclization of alcohol 16, followed by elimination of the pyridylselenenyl group with Dess-Martin oxidation. Further deprotection of the O-PMB group and extension of the chain, through Swern oxidation and Wittig reaction, led to the C9–C22 fragment 18 (Scheme 3). Subsequent Hosomi-Sakurai reaction with allylsilane 19, using Yamamoto’s chiral (acyloxy)borane (CAB), provided 20 with a good yield.

Amphidinolide N/caribenolide I

Amphidinolide N (21) is a 25-membered macrolide which contains a 2,5-trans-disubstituted tetrahydrofuran, an allylic epoxide, and 13 stereocenters (Figure 5). Amphidinolide N is the most potent cytotoxic member of this family against murine lymphoma L1210 (IC50 = 0.05 ng/mL) and human epidermoid carcinoma KB cell lines (IC50 = 0.06 ng/mL). However, despite the efforts of different researchers, no total synthesis of this compound has been reported so far. There are different approaches focused on the synthesis of the fragment which contains the tetrahydrofuran ring [27,28,29,30], a total synthesis of 7,10-epimer [31,32], and a recently described enantioselective synthesis of des-epoxy-amphidinolide N, which failed in the last epoxidation step towards amphidinolide N [33].
Both Sasaki’s [27] and Kuwahara’s [29] strategies to build the tetrahydrofuran moiety consisted of an intramolecular cyclization of a diol mesylate obtained by Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation (SAD) of mesyl protected alkenol 22 using AD-mix-β. Subsequent cyclization, mediated by base, afforded the desired 2,5-trans-disubstituted tetrahydrofuran 23 (Scheme 4).
Recently, Fuwa proposed the application of cobalt-catalyzed Hartung-Mukaiyama cyclization of γ-hydroxy olefins to obtain the tetrahydrofuran fragment [30]. Mukaiyama cyclization is known to afford 2,5-trans substituted tetrahydrofurans with a 2-hydroxy substituent. Hartung’s modification allows the access to 2-alkyl-substituted tetrahydrofurans, ideal for the synthesis of tetrahydrofuran-containing fragment 25 of amphidinolide N from alkenol 24 (Scheme 5). It is remarkable that unprotected hydroxy groups and somewhat bulky substituents are well-tolerated.
With close structural similarity, other macrolides have been discovered recently, namely isocaribenolide-I (26) and chlorohydrin (27) [34]. They were isolated from a free-swimming dinoflagellate Amphidinium species (KCA09053 and KCA09056 strains), together with amphidinolide N. Both have a 26-membered macrolide core, and present high cytotoxicity against human cervix adenocarcinoma HeLa cells (IC50 = 0.02 for isocaribenolide-I and 0.06 nM for chlorohydrin). Isocaribenolide-I presents a characteristic isobutyl side chain, and chlorohydrin is distinguished by a homonymous moiety (Figure 6).

Amphidinolides T

Amphidinolides T (2832), 19-membered lactones containing a trisubstituted tetrahydrofuran ring and seven or eight stereocenters (Figure 7), were first isolated by Kobayashi [35,36,37]. They showed cytotoxic activity against murine leukemia L1210 cells in vitro with an IC50 value of 18 μg/mL.
In 2013, Clark reported a total synthesis of T1, T2, and T4 from a common intermediate 33 (Scheme 6) [38]. Synthesis of the tetrahydrofuran-containing fragment 35 started from the allyl ether 36 of a commercially available alcohol, which was transformed into the α-diazo ketone 37 by sequential saponification, formation of the corresponding mixed anhydride derivative and reaction with diazomethane. Treatment of 37 with a catalytic amount of (Cu(acac)2) stereoselectively afforded the trans dihydrofuranone 38 in high yield. Six further steps led to the desired THF-containing fragment (Scheme 7). The total syntheses of amphidinolide T1, T3, and T4 were completed in 17 steps from a common precursor with 6.9%, 5.9%, and 5.5% overall yield, respectively.

2.1.2. Haterumalides and Biselides

Haterumalides (3944) (Figure 8) were isolated at the end of the 20th century from the Okinawan ascidian Lissoclinum sp. (haterumalide B) [39] and the Okinawan sponge Iricinia sp. (haterumalides NA-NE) [40]. Their cytotoxic activity against different targets made them secondary metabolites of great interest. However, no approaches towards their synthesis have been described in recent years [10,11].
Biselides (4549) (Figure 9), C-20 oxygenated analogues of haterumalides, are a family of polyketides which were isolated from the Okinawan ascidian Didemnidae sp. [41]. Their structure was determined by spectroscopic analysis and their biological activity was tested against tumor cell lines, due to their similarity to haterumalides. Cytotoxic activity of biselides A and C against various human cancer cells are comparable to cisplatin, the known anticancer drug. Notably, and unlike their haterumalide congeners, biselides A and C did not show toxicity against brine shrimp even at 50 μg mL−1, which makes them potential anticancer drug candidates.
In the last years, two total syntheses of biselide A have been published [42,43]. Kigoshi developed synthetic approaches towards both the core carbon fragment [44] and the macrolactone moiety [45]. Relying on these methodologies, Kigoshi and Hayakawa finally accomplished the total synthesis of biselide A [42]. The key step for the construction of the 3-hydroxy tetrahydrofuran unit was accomplished by intramolecular oxy-Michael cyclization of intermediate 50, which was obtained in four steps from D-mannose. Further 27 steps were required to obtain natural biselide A (Scheme 8).
Likewise, Kigoshi has also described the total synthesis of biselide E, from common advanced intermediate 52 [46].
On the other hand, Britton and coworkers have proposed a concise synthesis of biselide A in 20 linear steps from L-serine [43]. In this case the stereoselective formation of the tetrahydrofuran moiety 55 was done by microwave cyclization of chlorodiol intermediate 54 (Scheme 9).
The key to building the macrocyclic ring was the use of an intramolecular Reformatsky cyclization from intermediate 56, which led to a 3.5:1 ratio of epimers of the desired macrolactone. A sequence of oxidation/reduction was used to convert 57 in the desired epimer 58. Further five steps, including deprotection and installation of the side chain, provided biselide A with ca. 2% overall yield in 20 steps from L-serine (Scheme 10).

2.1.3. Chagosensine

Chagosensine (59) (Figure 10), a chloro-substituted macrolide, was isolated from the calcareous sponge Leucetta chagosensis. Its structure, consisting of a sixteen-membered macrolide, two 2,5-trans-disubstituted tetrahydrofuran rings embedded within, a unique Z,Z-configured chloro-1,3-diene unit, and eleven chiral centers, was assigned by spectroscopic techniques and degradation experiments [47]. Chagosensine structure is similar to the haterumalide and biselide families, but the conjugated chlorodiene unit is only present in this natural product. Nevertheless, Fürstner and co-workers have shown disagreement with the proposed structure and have carried out different synthetic studies in order to demonstrate their arguments [48,49].
The synthesis of putative chagosensine proposed by Fürstner relied on Mukaiyama cyclizations using Co(II) catalyst to obtain 2,5-trans-tetrahydrofuran derivatives 60 and 61 from the appropriate alkenols 62 and 63 [48]. After further elaboration, optimized Stille coupling of 1,2-bisstannane derivative 64 and vinyl iodide 65 provided the precursor diene 66 in moderate yield. Finally, six additional steps, including a Yamaguchi lactonization, produced the desired macrocycle (Scheme 11). The product proved unstable and had to be transformed into the known methyl esther, though huge deviations in the NMR seemed to indicate that the structure was misassigned. More recently, further efforts were made to access eight different diastereomers in order to find the correct structure [49]. Unfortunately, none of the structures synthesized matched the original spectroscopic data. Thus, the structure of this intriguing marine macrolide remains unresolved.

2.1.4. Formosalides

Formosalides A and B (Figure 11) are 17-membered macrolides isolated from marine dinoflagellate Prorocentrum sp. [50]. Their structures and relative stereochemistries were determined by spectroscopic techniques. Cytotoxicty of the formosalides was significantly lower than amphidinolide N or caribenolide I, despite their structural similarity. Formosalides A and B showed in vitro moderate cytotoxic activity against CCRF-CEM human T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells (LD50 [A] = 0.54 μg/mL and LD50 [B] = 0.43 μg/mL) and DLD-1 human colon adenocarcinoma cells (LD50 [A] > 40 μg/mL and LD50 [B] = 2.73 μg/mL) [50]. The structure and absolute configuration were confirmed by Fürstner and co-workers recently by total synthesis of different stereoisomers [51].
As said, Fürstner’s group has accomplished the synthesis of both macrolides and two other isomers [51]. The required trans-disubstituted tetrahydrofuran ring 68 was prepared by stereoselective cobalt-catalyzed oxidative cyclization of bishomoallylic alcohol 69, with excellent yield and selectivity (Scheme 12).
Following, the coupling of THF-carbaldehyde 68 with fragment 70 by an Evans–Tishchenko reaction led to intermediate 71, which was subjected to ring closing alkyne metathesis to yield macrocycle 72 with good yield. The final installation of the side chain, achieved by Stille-Migita coupling of vinyliodide 73 with the appropriate vinylstannane derivative, and deprotection of the TBS group led to both formosalides due to unexpected partial hydrolysis of the ketal (Scheme 13).
Mohapatra and co-workers have also reported a stereoselective synthesis of the C1-C16 fragment of formosalide B [52]. A one-pot Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation of α,β-unsaturated ester 74, followed by intramolecular SN2 displacement, produced the desired trans-tetrahydrofuran 75 with a high 88% yield and total stereoselectivity (Scheme 14).

2.1.5. Halichondrins

Halichondrins (7684) (Figure 12) are a family of polyether macrolides isolated in the 20th century from a marine sponge, Halichondria okadai Kadota [53]. According to their structure, they are classified in A–C halichondrins, norhalichondrins, and homohalichondrins (Figure 12). All have been found in natural sources except halichondrin A. Their complex structure is composed of a polyether macrolide with several fused five- and six-membered oxacycles.
Great efforts by Kishi’s group have been devoted to the synthesis of this family of compounds. To finally reach the total synthesis, Kishi et al. first established the synthesis of different fragments of halichondrins such as: C1–C19, through key Ni/Cr-mediated coupling of polyhalogenated nucleophiles [54,55], C14–C38 fragment, by oxy-Michael cyclization [56,57], and those combined led to the C1–C37 right halves of halichondrins A-C [58]. In 2017, Kishi and co-workers accomplished a general and scalable total synthesis of halichondrins [59]. In this paper, a new Zr/Ni-mediated one-pot ketone synthesis gave the key to couple the right (85) and the left (86) halves of all types of halichondrins, including homo- and reluctant norhalichondrins (Scheme 15). Then, after fluoride deprotection of the silyl groups, ketone 87 was transformed to the spiroketal 88. By coupling different halves, halichondrins, norhalichondrins and homohalichondrins were accessed. To exemplify the success of this strategy, an overall yield of 14.3% was obtained for the synthesis of halichondrin B from commercial d-galactal.
Recently, Nicolaou and coworkers described a reverse approach for the total synthesis of halichondrin B [60]. The strategy consisted of first forming the C-O bonds and then the C-C bonds of the cyclic moieties, which is opposite of the usual methods that first form C-C bonds and then rely on C-O bond-forming cyclizations. As an example, we can see in Scheme 16 the formation of linear ethers 89a and 89b by Nicholas etherification of alcohols 90 and 91. The required diastereoisomer 89b was subjected to radical cyclization to close the THF ring in 92. This methodology was applied throughout the total synthesis of halichondrin B, which was synthesized in just 25 linear steps from commercial materials.
Biological studies demonstrated that the right half of this class of natural products showed potent in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity [61], which led to the approval of eribulin mesylate (Figure 13) by the FDA for the treatment of late-stage breast cancer. This compound is known under the commercial name of Halaven®. The mechanism and pharmacokinetics of eribulin and its use in numerous Phase I, II, and III clinical trials have been described in different reviews [62,63].

2.1.6. Iriomoteolides

Iriomoteolides are a recent class of macrolides isolated from a marine benthic dinoflagellate of the Amphidinium species [64]. Among all members of this family, iriomoteolide-2a (94) [65], 10a (95) [66], and 13a (96) [67] present at least a substituted tetrahydrofuran ring (Figure 14). They stand up for their potent biological activity against human cervix adenocarcinoma HeLa cells (IC50 = 0.03 μg/mL, 1.5 μM and 0.5 μg/mL, respectively) and other cell lines, human B lymphocyte DG-75 (IC50 [2a] = 6 ng/mL and IC50 [10a] = 1.2 μM), and murine hepatocellular carcinoma MH134 cells (IC50 [10a] = 3.3 μM).
Despite their biological interest, there is no total synthesis reported for the 21-membered macrolide 95, nor the 22-membered macrolide 96, probably due to their complexity. On the contrary, the synthesis of 94 was accomplished by Fuwa and co-workers recently and it led to a structural revision [68,69].
Iriomoteolide-2a was the first 23-membered macrolide isolated from nature. Its structure contains two contiguous tetrahydrofuran rings embedded in the macrolide skeleton and a side chain containing three chiral centers. Two key steps made up the synthetic approach devised by Fuwa [68], a Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reaction between a vinyl iodide 97 and an olefin 98, and a ring closing metathesis with 99 to build the macrolactone (Scheme 17).
A convergent strategy allowed the synthesis of the different possible stereoisomers of iriomoteolide-2a. Having discarded the original proposed configuration, the construction of the correct bis-THF fragment was achieved by two sequential cycloetherifications. Thus, Sharpless asymmetric epoxidation of 100 provided diepoxide 101, which in situ underwent epoxide opening cascade with formation of the desired bis-THF 102. The relative configuration of this bis-tetrahydrofuran was established by ROE experiments (Scheme 18).
In this synthesis macrocyclization was performed at a very late stage. Thus, ring closing methathesis of precursor 103, with a second-generation Grubbs catalyst (G-II), led to macrocycle 104, which after final deprotection step afforded the desired iriomoteolide-2a (Scheme 19).
Thanks to this total synthesis it was possible to establish the absolute configuration of iriomoteolide-2a and to re-study the biological activity of synthetic compounds [69]. By comparing the spectral data, the correct stereochemistry of the natural compound could be assigned, which differed from the first proposed assignment [65]. Surprisingly, in contrast to the potent cytotoxic activity reported for the natural product, the synthetic iriomoteolide-2a only showed marginal antiproliferative activity in HeLa cells (IC50 = 60 μM). A plausible explanation for the high cytotoxicity measured in natural iriomoteolide-2a is the presence of traces of a highly potent contaminant in the sample.

2.1.7. Mandelalides

Mandelalides A-D (105-108) (Figure 15) are a group of marine macrolides isolated in 2012 from a species of lissoclinum ascidian [70]. Their macrocyclic core has two cyclic moieties embedded, a glycosylated 2,6-cis-substituted tetrahydropyran and a 2,5-cis-substituted tetrahydrofuran. Within them, the natural isolated compounds 105 and 106 yielded nanomolar IC50 values against mouse Neuro2A neuroblastoma cells and human NCI-H460 lung cancer cell lines. Their complex structure was elucidated by 1D and 2D NMR experiments and mass spectrometry, although the stereochemistry of Mandelalide A was definitively established after its total synthesis by Xu and Ye [71].
Years later, new members of this family were isolated, namely mandelalide E-L [72,73]. This has permitted the study of structure-activity relationship, showing that glycosylation is essential for their biological activity.
Since the discovery of mandelalide A, different researchers have proposed approaches for its total synthesis [12]. The main difference between them lies in the key reaction steps. Tao Ye and co-workers reported the use of Rychnovsky–Bartlett cyclization for the preparation of the tetrahydrofuran moiety and an Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons for the macrocyclization [71]. Amos B. Smith developed an anion relay chemistry (ARC) strategy [74] to synthesize the tetrahydrofuran and tetrahydropyran structural motifs which were joined by Yamaguchi esterification [75]. Intramolecular Heck cyclization [76], Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation [77] or Julia olefination [78] were also employed in other total syntheses.
As an example, we want to highlight the convergent total synthesis reported by Altmann [79]. In this synthesis, the highly oxygenated tetrahydrofuran 109 was constructed from compound 110 by acetal cleavage/epoxide opening cascade reaction. Then, substitution of the primary OH with iodine (111) and subsequent radical alkynylation with sulfone 112 afforded 113. After further elaboration, the tetrahydrofuran fragment 114 was accessed (Scheme 20).
With the needed building blocks in hand, tetrahydropyran 115 and tetrahydrofuran 114 moieties were united via Sonogashira coupling to afford enyne 116. Then, Shiina macrolactonization was used to access macrolactone 117, which was transformed to the desired natural product in four additional steps and a 2.15% overall yield (Scheme 21).
Biological studies of synthetic mandelalide A revealed a potent inhibitory activity of the proliferation of H460 and A549 lung carcinoma cells, but not cytotoxic activity at least within the concentration range studied [70,79]. In general, mandelalides have shown to have highly cell-type dependent bioactive effects.

2.1.8. Mangromicins

Mangromicin A (118) and B (119) (Figure 16) were the first members of this family isolated from actinomycete Lechevalieria aerocolonigenes [80], followed by six new analogues, mangromicins D-I [81]. The mangromicins contain a cyclopentadecaene skeleton with a 5,6-dihydro-4-hidroxy-2-pyrone moiety and a tetrahydrofuran unit. All mangromicins show important biological activities. Special effects have been found in Mangromicin A, which exhibits potent antitrypanosomal activity against Trypanosoma brucei brucei GUTat 3.1 strain (IC50 = 2.4 in vitro essays) and cytotoxicity against MRC-5 cells.
The first and unique enantioselective total synthesis of mangromicin A was reported by Takahashi and coworkers [82]. Deprotection of the OTBS group in compound 126 led to hydroxyketone 127, in equilibrium with its hemiketal. Then, a Mukaiyama-type vinylogous alkylation was used as key step to synthesize the desired tetrahydrofuran moiety (-)-128, bearing a C-2 quaternary carbon with the desired configuration. A further 21 steps, including a crucial Dieckmann cyclization to generate the 4-hydroxydihydropyrone unit, were needed to complete the total synthesis of mangromicin A (Scheme 22) [82].

2.1.9. Nonalides: Cytospolides

Cytospolides (Figure 17), which belong to a nonalide family, are a group of compounds which were isolated in Gomera island (Spain) from an endophytic fungus, Cytospora sp., by Zhang and co-workers in 2011 [83]. The different structures and absolute configurations of cytospolides were first elucidated and established by spectroscopic analysis, chemical derivatization, and X-ray diffraction [83]. Almost all members of this family contain a 10-membered lactone. Additionally, cytospolides M (129), cytospolide N (130), and cytospolide O (131) are tetrahydrofuran-containing nonalides. Cytospolide Q (132) is the exception, containing a 15-carbon skeleton with two different rings, a tetrahydrofuran and a γ-butyrolactone.
Stark et al. have reported the total synthesis of cytospolide D and its conversion into cytospolides M, O, and Q (Scheme 23) [84]. Cytospolide M was obtained in a single step with a 86% yield from cytospolide D, by diastereoselective epoxidation. Subsequent opening of cytospolide M with potassium trimethylsilanolate, followed by spontaneous recyclization during the workup, allowed the preparation of the desired cytospolide Q. On the other hand, cytospolide O was obtained through an oxa-Michael addition from a close precursor of cytospolide D in three steps.
In a different approach, a convergent route for the total synthesis of cytospolide Q has been proposed in 10 linear steps, with an overall yield of 2.8%, from known intermediate 135 [85]. A set of cascade reactions are the key to build the tetrahydrofuran ring and the γ-butyrolactone moiety (Scheme 24).
Nine linear steps from 136 were needed to prepare the required precursor (137). A set of convenient cascade reactions, such as acid-catalyzed acetal deprotection, subsequent tetrahydropyranyl formation by epoxide opening with the appropriate hydroxyl group and final γ-lactonization allowed the formation of cytospolide Q in a single step from 137 (Scheme 25).
The moderate cytotoxic activity against tumor cell lines of some members of the cytospolide family [83] has prompted researchers to synthesize structurally diverse derivatives which may have improved properties [85]. Thus, Stark and Erlich [86] envisioned the synthesis of cytospolide analogues 138 and 139 from a modified cytospolide D intermediate 140 in which an alkynyl side chain was used as a versatile handle for further functionalization (Scheme 26).

2.1.10. Oscillariolide

Murakami and co-workers isolated a new macrolide from a marine blue-green alga Oscillatoria sp. in 1991 [87]. Oscillariolide (Figure 18) has a complex structure which was established on the basis of extensive spectral analysis. Interestingly, its determination has been very useful for the discovery of phormidolides.
Despite the interesting inhibition activity of oscillariolide towards the cell division of fertilized starfish eggs, no total synthesis of this compound has been reported.

2.1.11. Phormidolides

The first member of this family, Phormidolide A (142) (Figure 19), was isolated in 2002 from the marine cyanobacterium Leptolyngbya sp. [88]. Although it was an inactive metabolite in cell line essays, phormidolide A showed high toxicity to brine shrimp (LC50 = 1.5 μM). At that moment, a complex structure was proposed on the basis of spectroscopic techniques. Eleven stereocentres, a tetrahydrofuran-embedded macrolactone, a polyol side chain and a terminal bromomethoxydiene motif composed the polyketide. Almost 20 years later, the assignment of eight chiral centers was corrected thanks to the contribution of Gerwick, Paterson, Britton, and Piel and colleagues, who used synthetic methods [89], computational information, and anisotropic NMR studies [90].
In 2015, the study of an active organic extract of Petrosiidae sponge concluded with the discovery of two important novel phormidolides, phormidolide B and phormidolide C (Figure 20) [91]. Their structural similarity to phormidolide A [90] and oscillariolide [87] helped in the establishment of their overall structure by NMR techniques.
These new compounds present cytotoxic activity against three human tumor cell lines, lung (A-549), colon (HT-29), and breast (MDA-MB-231), with an unknown mechanism of action. Their challenging structure has attracted the interest of synthetic chemists who have developed different strategies to access either the macrolide ring [91,92,93] or the polyhydroxylated chain [94,95].
Phormidolides could be divided into three molecular fragments with two main disconnections: a macrocyclic core, a polyhydroxylated chain containing a tetradecanoic fatty acid, and a propargylic organometallic (Scheme 27). Synthetic approaches to each individual fragment have been described, although no completed synthesis of any of these compounds has been reported so far [93].
Focusing on the tetrahydrofuran-containing macrolactone, Álvarez et al. published an approach to its synthesis starting from commercially available 2-D-deoxyribose [91]. The key steps of this synthesis are the simultaneous formation of a trisubstituted double bond and a new stereocenter through the stereoselective 1,5-anti-addition of an allylstannane 146 and ribose-derived aldehyde 147. Then, 148 was subjected to final Shiina macrolactonization affording the desired 149 (Scheme 28).

2.2. Linear Polyketides

Ionostatin

Ionostatin (Figure 21) [96], extracted from an actinomycite of Streptomycetaceae family, is the most recently discovered polyether ionophore [97,98,99]. Its structure and absolute stereochemistry were determined by NMR experiments, X-ray diffraction (calcium salt) and bioinformatic approach. The compound, a close analog to ionomycin (Figure 22) [100], contains 15 chiral centers and two tetrahydrofuran rings.
Polyether ionophores are chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of cancer [101]. Initial bioactivity essays of ionostatin revealed inhibition (LD50 = 7.4 μg/mL) against two important cancer cell lines such as U87 glioblastama and SKOV3 ovarian carcinoma.

2.3. Polycyclic Polyketides

Akaeolide

Akaeolide (Figure 23) is another polycyclic polyketide isolated from a culture extract of a marine-derived actinomycete, Streptomyces sp., in 2013 [102]. Its 15-membered carbocyclic structure possesses a five-membered cyclic ether and a β-keto-δ-lactone unit. The biological essays of this compound have shown modest cytotoxicity against 3Y1 rat fibroblasts with an IC50 of 8.5 μM [103].

2.4. Acetogenin Metabolites

Acetogenins are secondary metabolites derived from polyketides. Acetogenins from marine algae are mostly halogenated and are thought to have a common C15 precursor derived from a C16 fatty acid. The majority of these marine C15 acetogenins are different-sized cyclic ethers with a terminal enyne or bromoallene. Among them, tetrahydrofuran and bis-tetrahydrofuran acetogenins are quite abundant. Acetogenins are known to be chemotaxonomic markers from red algae to the genus Laurencia. A general overview of C15 acetogenins from 1965 till 2015 was provided by Falkenberg [104].
In 2016, three new tetrahydrofuran-containing acetogenins with potent and selective antiproliferative activity against human nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cell lines and their methotrexate-resistant counterparts have been described [105].
In 2019, a synthetic route for the bis-tetrahydrofuran core of acetogenins based on a chemoenzymatic cascade reaction was reported [106]. Catalytic hydrogenation of benzylidene acetal 153 produces the inside-out cyclization to afford bis-tetrahydrofuran-ditosylate 154 in 66% yield. It was also possible to obtain a different stereochemistry on the bis-tetrahydrofuran moiety 156, through a double Payne rearrangement of epoxide 155 followed by 5-exo-tet cycloetherification (Scheme 29).

Obtusallenes

Obtusallenes are C15-halogenated acetogenins that contain a 12-membered ether ring. Obtusallene I was isolated in 1982 from red algae Laurencia obtusa and its structure was elucidated by NMR and X-ray crystallographic methods. Since, other obtusallenes have been described: obtusallene II (157) and III (158) [107], obtusallene IV (159) [108], obtusallenes V-VII (160-162), and obtusallenes VIII-IX [109]. The structure of 160-162 was corrected in 2008 by Braddock due to unambiguously solved X-ray crystallography and biosynthetic studies [110,111]. Among the obtusallenes, compounds 157-162 contain a tetrahydrofuran motif (Figure 24).
The first synthesis of tetrahydrofuran rings of compounds 157 and 159 was reported in 2007 [112]. In this synthesis, diene 163 was transformed into tetrahydrofuran 164 with 18% yield and >95% purity in a one-pot reaction (with the sequential addition of m-CPBA, TMSCl and PPh3, TBAF, and then TBCO) (Scheme 30).
Parallelly, a synthesis of the C8–C15 fragment of obtusallene III 158 was described [113]. The Pd-catalyzed cyclization of triol 165 produced 2,5-disubstituted 3-hydroxytetrahydrofuran 166 with an 82% yield. The chemo- and diastereoselective cyclization implies the direct effect of a noncovalent interaction of the counterion carboxylate with the OH groups of the cationic π-allyl-Pd(II) intermediate (Scheme 31).
Braddock reported the only known total synthesis of a member of this family to date: obtusallene X (167) [114]. The key step of this synthesis is the cyclization of clorhydrine intermediate 168 through a stereoselective bromoetherification process.
Five additional steps from 169 afforded acyclic diene 170, which, under ring-closing metathesis with a second-generation Hoveyda−Grubbs precatalyst, produces macrocyclic 171. Six additional steps were needed to obtain 167 with a 7% overall yield from 168 (Scheme 32).

2.5. Polyhydroxyl

Amphezonol A

The dinoflagelatte Amphidinium sp. has been extensively studied in order to discover and isolate new compounds bearing interesting biological properties, such as macrolides, amphidinolides or polyhydroxyl compounds. In 2006, a novel polyhydroxyl metabolite was isolated, amphenozol A (172) [115], the structure of which consists of a C60 linear aliphatic chain with two tetrahydropyran rings, one tetrahydrofuran ring, and twenty-one hydroxyl groups (Figure 25). Its structure was established by NMR experiments. Additionally, the biological analysis showed a modest inhibitory activity against DNA polymerase α.

2.6. Bycyclic

2.6.1. Asperpentenone

Recently, J. Wang et al. isolated a novel polyketide, asperpentenone A, from the fungus Aspergillus sp. [116]. Its structure, elucidated by nuclear magnetic resonance techniques and X-ray diffraction, contains a cyclopentenone-tetrahydrofuran moiety (Figure 26). So far, no biological activity of asperpentenone A has been described.

2.6.2. Plakortones

Ten lactone metabolites, known as plakortones (174183), have been isolated from the marine sponge of the genus Plakortis. Plakortones belong to a big family of oxygenated polyketide metabolites, the structures of which contain a bicyclic system composed of a tetrahydrofuran fused to a γ-butyrolactone ring (Figure 27). Some of them have been discovered and characterized during the 20th century [117,118], while plakortone L, N, P, and Q were recently isolated [119,120].
Since their discovery, numerous studies can be found in the literature with different approaches towards the synthesis of these natural products, their epimers [121] or analogues [122]. A palladium-(II)-mediated hydroxycyclization-carbonylation-lactonization cascade [123] was the general methodology applied to obtain the plakortone core in some cases [122,124,125]. There, from diols 184, the byclyclic diastereomers 185 or 186 can be accessed (Scheme 33).
The synthesis of the four possible diastereoisomers and comparison with the natural product allowed Wong and co-workers to determine the absolute configuration of the four stereocenters of plakortone B [126]. Thus, retrosynthetic analysis revealed butenolide 187 as the potential precursor of the bicyclic lactone. Formation of butenolide required ten steps from D-mannitol. The bicyclic framework 188 was directly formed with a 90% yield by the reaction of butenolide with 1,5-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-5-ene (DBU), in a domino Michael addition followed by transesterification. Total synthesis of plakortone B was achieved in 22 further steps with a low overall yield (<1%) (Scheme 34).
Another biomimetic approach converted plakortide E derivative 189 into plakortone B [127]. Treatment of 189 with zinc in acetic acid broke the peroxy O-O bond and provided diol intermediate 190. Further intramolecular oxa-Michael addition/lactonization cascade reaction afforded the desired product with high yield (90%) (Scheme 35).
In 2014, the total synthesis of plakortone L was also reported [128]. In this case, the strategy to obtain the tetrahydrofuran ring was a [3+2] annulation. Thus, the tetrahydrofuranyl ring 191 was obtained by the reaction of isopropylidene-protected D-arabinose 192 and protected methallyl alcohol 193 in the presence of BF3·OEt2. Fourteen further steps were required to accomplish the total synthesis of plakortone L with 6% overall yield (Scheme 36).
In terms of their biological activity, plakortones A-D belong to the class of activators of cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-pumping ATPase at micromolar concentrations, specially plakortone D [117]. Plakortones B-F exhibit in vitro cytotoxic activity on a murine fibrosarcome cell line [122]. However, plakortone Q, being the only member of the family which contains a hydroxyl group in the ring system, is not active against any of the tested tumor cell lines [129].

3. Conclusions

Polyketides are a class of marine natural products with immense structural and biological diversity. They have interesting biological properties that sometimes make them potential drug candidates, such as in eribulin mesylate. Here, organic synthesis in general, and total synthesis in particular still play an important dual role. First, it is the final way of determining the correct structure of a product. Even though, nowadays, there are cutting-edge NMR techniques available, we still see many cases of structure misassignment in marine bioactive products. Secondly, the scarcity of some marine products makes them unavailable for research, and synthesis provides sufficient amounts for proper biological studies. The tetrahydrofuran motif is common among marine polyketides; thus, the development of new methodologies for the synthesis of tetrahydrofurans is a current need.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, L.F.-P. and P.G.-A.; writing—review and editing, C.D.-P. and A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Junta de Castilla y León, grant number VA294-P18.

Acknowledgments

C.D.-P. and L.F.-P. acknowledge predoctoral Grants funded by the European Social Fund and the “Junta de Castilla y León”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Acac: acetylacetone; AIBN: azobisisobutyronitrile; CAB: (acyloxy)borane; CAN: ceric ammonium nitrate; CSA: camphorsulfonic acid; CuTC: copper(I) thiophene-2-carboxylate; DBU: 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene; dba: dibenzylideneacetone; DDQ: 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-p-benzoquinone; (+)-DET: diethyl tartrate; (DHQD)2PHAL: hydroquinidine 1,4-phthalazinediyl diether; DMAP: 4-dimethylaminopyridine; DMI: 1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone; DMF: dimethylformamide; DMI: 1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone; DMP: Dess-Martin periodinane; DMPA: dimethylol propionic acid; DMPM: 3,4-dimethoxybenzyl; DMSO: dimethyl sulphoxide; KHMDS: potassium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide; LiHDMS: lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide; mCPBA: meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid; MNBA: 2-methyl-6-nitrobenzoic anhydride; MOM: methoxymethyl; Ms: methanesulfonyl; NMP: n-methylpyrrolidone; PMB: p-methoxybenzyl; PPTS: pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate; PT: 1-phenyltetrazol-5-yl; TASF: tris(dimethylamino)sulfonium difluorotrimethylsilicate; TBAF: tetrabutylammonium fluoride; TBCO: 2,4,4,6-tetrabromo-2,5-cyclohexadienone; TBDPS: tert-butyldiphenylsilyl; TES: triethylsilyl; TFA: trifluoroacetic acid; TIPS: triisopropylsilyl; TMS: trimethylsilyl; Tr: triphenyl methyl; Ts: tosyl.

References

  1. Fuwa, H. Structure determination, correction, and disproof of marine macrolide natural products by chemical synthesis. Org. Chem. Front. 2021, 8, 3990–4023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lorente, A.; Makowski, K.; Albericio, F.; Álvarez, M. Bioactive Marine Polyketides as Potential and Promising Drugs. Ann. Mar. Biol. Res. 2014, 1, 1003. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kobayashi, J.; Kubota, T. Bioactive Macrolides and Polyketides from Marine Dinoflagellates of the Genus Amphidinium. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Parenty, A.; Moreau, A.X.; Campagne, J.-M. Macrolactonizations in the Total Synthesis of Natural Products. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 911–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nasir, N.M.; Ermanis, K.; Clarke, P.A. Strategies for the construction of tetrahydropyran rings in the synthesis of natural products. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 3323–3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fuwa, H. Contemporary Strategies for the Synthesis of Tetrahydropyran Derivatives: Application to Total Synthesis of Neopeltolide, a Marine Macrolide Natural Product. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Barbero, H.; Díez-Poza, C.; Barbero, A. The Oxepane Motif in Marine Drugs. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Fernandes, R.A.; Pathare, R.S.; Gorve, D.A. Advances in Total Synthesis of Some 2,3,5-Trisubstituted Tetrahydrofuran Natural Products. Chem. Asian J. 2020, 15, 2815–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fernandes, R.A.; Gorve, D.A.; Pathare, R.S. Emergence of 2,3,5-trisubstituted tetrahydrofuran natural products and their synthesis. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020, 18, 7002–7025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lorente, A.; Lamariano-Merketegi, J.; Albericio, F.; Álvarez, M. Tetrahydrofuran-Containing Macrolides: A Fascinating Gift from the Deep Sea. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 4567–4610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kigoshi, H.; Hayakawa, I. Marine cytotoxic macrolides haterumalides and biselides, and related natural products. Chem. Rec. 2007, 7, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Shabir, G.; Saeed, A. A Comparative Study of Synthetic Approaches Towards Total Synthesis of Mandelalide A, An Anti-Lung Cancer Metabolite from Lissoclinum Ascidian. Curr. Org. Chem. 2018, 22, 101–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, H.; Zou, J.; Yan, X.; Chen, J.; Cao, X.; Wu, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, T. Marine-Derived Macrolides 1990–2020: An Overview of Chemical and Biological Diversity. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nuzzo, G.; Gomes, B.A.; Luongo, E.; Torres, M.C.M.; Santos, E.A.; Cutignano, A.; Pessoa, O.D.L.; Costa-Lotufo, L.V.; Fontana, A. Dinoflagellate-Related Amphidinolides from the Brazilian Octocoral Stragulum bicolor. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 1881–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Valot, G.; Mailhol, D.; Regens, C.S.; O’Malley, D.P.; Godineau, E.; Takikawa, H.; Philipps, P.; Fürstner, A. Concise Total Syntheses of Amphidinolides C and F. Chem. A Eur. J. 2015, 21, 2398–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ferrié, L.; Fenneteau, J.; Figadère, B. Total Synthesis of the Marine Macrolide Amphidinolide F. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 3192–3196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Akwaboah, D.C.; Wu, D.; Forsyth, C.J. Stereoselective Synthesis of the C1–C9 and C11–C25 Fragments of Amphidinolides C, C2, C3, and F. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 1180–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Su, Y.-X.; Dai, W.-M. Synthesis of the C18–C26 tetrahydrofuran-containing fragment of amphidinolide C congeners via tandem asymmetric dihydroxylation and S N 2 cyclization. Tetrahedron 2018, 74, 1546–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Namirembe, S.; Yan, L.; Morken, J.P. Studies toward the Synthesis of Amphidinolide C1: Stereoselective Construction of the C(1)–C(15) Segment. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 9174–9177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, C.H.; An, H.J.; Shin, W.K.; Yu, W.; Woo, S.K.; Jung, S.K.; Lee, E. Total Synthesis of (−)-Amphidinolide E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 8019–8021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, C.H.; An, H.J.; Shin, W.K.; Yu, W.; Woo, S.K.; Jung, S.K.; Lee, E. Stereoselective Synthesis of (−)-Amphidinolide E. Chem. Asian J. 2008, 3, 1523–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Va, P.; Roush, W.R. Total Synthesis of Amphidinolide E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15960–15961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Va, P.; Roush, W.R. Synthesis of 2-epi-Amphidinolide E: An Unexpected and Highly Selective C(2) Inversion during an Esterification Reaction. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Va, P.; Roush, W.R. Total synthesis of amphidinolide E and amphidinolide E stereoisomers. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 5768–5796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Bosch, L.; Mola, L.; Petit, E.; Saladrigas, M.; Esteban, J.; Costa, A.M.; Vilarrasa, J. Formal Total Synthesis of Amphidinolide E. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 11021–11034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Sanchez, D.; Andreou, T.; Costa, A.M.; Meyer, K.G.; Williams, D.R.; Barasoain, I.; Díaz, J.F.; Lucena-Agell, D.; Vilarrasa, J.; Sánchez-Pérez, D. Total Synthesis of Amphidinolide K, a Macrolide That Stabilizes F-Actin. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 8511–8519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sasaki, M.; Kawashima, Y.; Fuwa, H. Studies toward the Total Synthesis of Amphidinolide N: Stereocontrolled Synthesis of the C13–C29 Segment. Heterocycles 2015, 90, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kawashima, Y.; Toyoshima, A.; Fuwa, H.; Sasaki, M. Toward the Total Synthesis of Amphidinolide N: Synthesis of the C8–C29 Fragment. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 2232–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fujishima, Y.; Ogura, Y.; Towada, R.; Enomoto, M.; Kuwahara, S. Stereoselective synthesis of the C17–C29 fragment of amphidinolide N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 5240–5242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ohta, M.; Kato, S.; Sugai, T.; Fuwa, H. Cobalt-Catalyzed Hartung–Mukaiyama Cyclization of γ-Hydroxy Olefins: Stereocontrolled Synthesis of the Tetrahydrofuran Moiety of Amphidinolide N. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 5584–5615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ochiai, K.; Kuppusamy, S.; Yasui, Y.; Okano, T.; Matsumoto, Y.; Gupta, N.R.; Takahashi, Y.; Kubota, T.; Kobayashi, J.; Hayashi, Y. Total Synthesis of the 7,10-Epimer of the Proposed Structure of Amphidinolide N, Part I: Synthesis of the C1-C13 Subunit. Chem. A Eur. J. 2016, 22, 3282–3286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ochiai, K.; Kuppusamy, S.; Yasui, Y.; Harada, K.; Gupta, N.R.; Takahashi, Y.; Kubota, T.; Kobayashi, J.; Hayashi, Y. Total Synthesis of the 7,10-Epimer of the Proposed Structure of Amphidinolide N, Part II: Synthesis of C17-C29 Subunit and Completion of the Synthesis. Chem. A Eur. J. 2016, 22, 3287–3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Trost, B.M.; Bai, W.-J.; Stivala, C.E.; Hohn, C.; Poock, C.; Heinrich, M.; Xu, S.; Rey, J. Enantioselective Synthesis of des-Epoxy-Amphidinolide N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 17316–17326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tsuda, M.; Akakabe, M.; Minamida, M.; Kumagai, K.; Tsuda, M.; Konishi, Y.; Tominaga, A.; Fukushi, E.; Kawabata, J. Structure and Stereochemistry of Amphidinolide N Congeners from Marine Dinoflagellate Amphidinium Species. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2021, 69, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tsuda, M.; Endo, T.; Kobayashi, J. Amphidinolide T, Novel 19-Membered Macrolide from Marine Dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1349–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kobayashi, J.; Kubota, T.; Endo, A.T.; Tsuda, M. Amphidinolides T2, T3, and T4, New 19-Membered Macrolides from the Dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. and the Biosynthesis of Amphidinolide T1. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kubota, T.; Endo, T.; Tsuda, M.; Shiro, M.; Kobayashi, J. Amphidinolide T5, a new 19-membered macrolide from a dinoflagellate and X-ray structure of amphidinolide T1. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 6175–6179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Clark, J.S.; Romiti, F. Total Syntheses of Amphidinolides T1, T3, and T4. Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 10256–10259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ueda, K.; Hu, Y. Haterumalide B: A new cytotoxic macrolide from an Okinawan ascidian Lissoclinum sp. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 6305–6308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Takada, N.; Sato, H.; Suenaga, K.; Arimoto, H.; Yamada, K.; Ueda, K.; Uemura, D. Isolation and structures of haterumalides NA, NB, NC, ND, and NE, novel macrolides from an Okinawan Sponge Ircinia sp. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 6309–6312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Teruya, T.; Suenaga, K.; Maruyama, S.; Kurotaki, M.; Kigoshi, H. Biselides A–E: Novel polyketides from the Okinawan ascidian Didemnidae sp. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 6561–6567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hayakawa, I.; Kigoshi, H.; Okamura, M.; Suzuki, K.; Shimanuki, M.; Kimura, K.; Yamada, T.; Ohyoshi, T. Total Synthesis of Biselide A, A Cytotoxic Macrolide of Marine Origin. Synthesis 2017, 49, 2958–2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Challa, V.R.; Kwon, D.; Taron, M.; Fan, H.; Kang, B.; Wilson, D.; Haeckl, F.P.J.; Keerthisinghe, S.; Linington, R.G.; Britton, R. Total synthesis of biselide A. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 5534–5543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Satoh, Y.; Kawamura, D.; Yamaura, M.; Ikeda, Y.; Ochiai, Y.; Hayakawa, I.; Kigoshi, H. Synthetic studies toward biselides. Part 1: Synthesis of the core carbon framework of biselides A, B, and E using Stille coupling. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 1390–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Satoh, Y.; Yamada, T.; Onozaki, Y.; Kawamura, D.; Hayakawa, I.; Kigoshi, H. Synthetic studies toward biselides. Part 2: Synthesis of the macrolactone part of biselides A and B using allylic oxidation. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 1393–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hayakawa, I.; Suzuki, K.; Okamura, M.; Funakubo, S.; Onozaki, Y.; Kawamura, D.; Ohyoshi, T.; Kigoshi, H. Total Synthesis of Biselide E, a Marine Polyketide. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 5713–5716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Řezanka, T.; Hanuš, L.; Dembitsky, V.M. Chagosensine, a New Chlorinated Macrolide from the Red Sea Sponge Leucetta chagosensis. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 2003, 4073–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Heinrich, M.; Murphy, J.J.; Ilg, M.K.; Letort, A.; Flasz, J.; Philipps, P.; Fürstner, A. Total Synthesis of Putative Chagosensine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 13575–13581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Heinrich, M.; Murphy, J.J.; Ilg, M.K.; Letort, A.; Flasz, J.T.; Philipps, P.; Fürstner, A. Chagosensine: A Riddle Wrapped in a Mystery Inside an Enigma. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 6409–6422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Lu, C.-K.; Chen, Y.-M.; Wang, S.-H.; Wu, Y.-Y.; Cheng, Y.-M. Formosalides A and B, cytotoxic 17-membered ring macrolides from a marine dinoflagellate Prorocentrum sp. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1825–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Schulthoff, S.; Hamilton, J.Y.; Heinrich, M.; Kwon, Y.; Wirtz, C.; Fürstner, A. The Formosalides: Structure Determination by Total Synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 446–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gajula, S.; Reddy, A.V.V.; Reddy, D.P.; Yadav, J.S.; Mohapatra, D.K. Stereoselective Synthesis of the C1–C16 Fragment of the Purported Structure of Formosalide B. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 10217–10224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hirata, Y.; Uemura, D. Halichondrins-antitumor polyether macrolides from a marine sponge. Pure Appl. Chem. 1986, 58, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Li, J.; Yan, W.; Kishi, Y. Unified Synthesis of C1–C19 Building Blocks of Halichondrins via Selective Activation/Coupling of Polyhalogenated Nucleophiles in (Ni)/Cr-Mediated Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6226–6231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yan, W.; Li, Z.; Kishi, Y. Selective Activation/Coupling of Polyhalogenated Nucleophiles in Ni/Cr-Mediated Reactions: Synthesis of C1–C19 Building Block of Halichondrin Bs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6219–6225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kim, D.-S.; Dong, C.-G.; Kim, J.T.; Guo, H.; Huang, J.; Tiseni, P.S.; Kishi, Y. New Syntheses of E7389 C14−C35 and Halichondrin C14−C38 Building Blocks: Double-Inversion Approach. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15636–15641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dong, C.-G.; Henderson, J.A.; Kaburagi, Y.; Sasaki, T.; Kim, D.-S.; Kim, J.T.; Urabe, D.; Guo, H.; Kishi, Y. New Syntheses of E7389 C14−C35 and Halichondrin C14−C38 Building Blocks: Reductive Cyclization and Oxy-Michael Cyclization Approaches. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15642–15646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yahata, K.; Ye, N.; Iso, K.; Naini, S.R.; Yamashita, S.; Ai, Y.; Kishi, Y. Unified Synthesis of Right Halves of Halichondrins A–C. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 8792–8807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yahata, K.; Ye, N.; Ai, Y.; Iso, K.; Kishi, Y. Unified, Efficient, and Scalable Synthesis of Halichondrins: Zirconium/Nickel-Mediated One-Pot Ketone Synthesis as the Final Coupling Reaction. Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 10936–10940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nicolaou, K.C.; Pan, S.; Shelke, Y.; Das, D.; Ye, Q.; Lu, Y.; Sau, S.; Bao, R.; Rigol, S. A Reverse Approach to the Total Synthesis of Halichondrin B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 9267–9276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Towle, M.J.; Salvato, K.A.; Budrow, J.; Wels, B.F.; Kuznetsov, G.; Aalfs, K.K.; Welsh, S.; Zheng, W.; Seletsky, B.M.; Palme, M.H.; et al. In vitro and in vivo anticancer activities of synthetic macrocyclic ketone analogues of halichondrin B. Cancer Res. 2001, 61. [Google Scholar]
  62. Cigler, T.; Vahdat, L.T. Eribulin mesylate for the treatment of breast cancer. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2010, 11, 1587–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Swami, U.; Shah, U.; Goel, S. Eribulin in Cancer Treatment. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 5016–5058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Tsuda, M.; Oguchi, K.; Iwamoto, R.; Okamoto, Y.; Kobayashi, J.; Fukushi, E.; Kawabata, J.; Ozawa, T.; Masuda, A.; Kitaya, A.Y.; et al. Iriomoteolide-1a, a Potent Cytotoxic 20-Membered Macrolide from a Benthic Dinoflagellate Amphidinium Species. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4469–4474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kumagai, K.; Tsuda, M.; Masuda, A.; Fukushi, E.; Kawabata, J. Iriomoteolide-2a, a Cytotoxic 23-Membered Macrolide from Marine Benthic Dinoflagellate Amphidinium Species. Heterocycles 2015, 91, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Akakabe, M.; Kumagai, K.; Tsuda, M.; Konishi, Y.; Tominaga, A.; Kaneno, D.; Fukushi, E.; Kawabata, J.; Masuda, A.; Tsuda, M. Iriomoteolides-10a and 12a, Cytotoxic Macrolides from Marine Dinoflagellate Amphidinium Species. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2016, 64, 1019–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Akakabe, M.; Kumagai, K.; Tsuda, M.; Konishi, Y.; Tominaga, A.; Tsuda, M.; Fukushi, E.; Kawabata, J. Iriomoteolide-13a, a cytotoxic 22-membered macrolide from a marine dinoflagellate Amphidinium species. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 2962–2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sakamoto, K.; Hakamata, A.; Tsuda, M.; Fuwa, H. Total Synthesis and Stereochemical Revision of Iriomoteolide-2a. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 3801–3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sakamoto, K.; Hakamata, A.; Iwasaki, A.; Suenaga, K.; Tsuda, M.; Fuwa, H. Total Synthesis, Stereochemical Revision, and Biological Assessment of Iriomoteolide-2a. Chem. A Eur. J. 2019, 25, 8528–8542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sikorska, J.; Hau, A.M.; Anklin, C.; Parker-Nance, S.; Davies-Coleman, M.; Ishmael, J.E.; McPhail, K.L. Mandelalides A–D, Cytotoxic Macrolides from a New Lissoclinum Species of South African Tunicate. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 6066–6075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Lei, H.; Yan, J.; Yu, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Xu, Z.; Ye, T. Total Synthesis and Stereochemical Reassignment of Mandelalide A. Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 6651–6655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nazari, M.; Serrill, J.D.; Sikorska, J.; Ye, T.; Ishmael, J.E.; McPhail, K.L. Discovery of Mandelalide E and Determinants of Cytotoxicity for the Mandelalide Series. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 1374–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nazari, M.; Serrill, J.D.; Wan, X.; Nguyen, M.H.; Anklin, C.; Gallegos, D.A.; Smith, A.B.; Ishmael, J.E.; McPhail, K.L. New Mandelalides Expand a Macrolide Series of Mitochondrial Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 7850–7862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Nguyen, M.H.; Imanishi, M.; Kurogi, T.; Smith, A.B., III. Total Synthesis of (−)-Mandelalide A Exploiting Anion Relay Chemistry (ARC): Identification of a Type II ARC/CuCN Cross-Coupling Protocol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 3675–3678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Nguyen, M.H.; Imanishi, M.; Kurogi, T.; Wan, X.; Ishmael, J.E.; McPhail, K.L.; Smith, A.B., III. Synthetic Access to the Mandelalide Family of Macrolides: Development of an Anion Relay Chemistry Strategy. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 4287–4306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Reddy, K.M.; Yamini, V.; Singarapu, K.K.; Ghosh, S. Synthesis of Proposed Aglycone of Mandelalide A. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 2658–2660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Yamini, V.; Reddy, K.M.; Krishna, A.S.; Lakshmi, J.K.; Ghosh, S. Formal total synthesis of mandelalide A. J. Chem. Sci. 2019, 131, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. AnkiReddy, P.; AnkiReddy, S.; Sabitha, G. Synthetic Studies toward the Revised Aglycone of Mandelalide A. ChemistrySelect 2017, 2, 1032–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Brütsch, T.M.; Bucher, P.; Altmann, K.-H. Total Synthesis and Biological Assessment of Mandelalide A. Chem. A Eur. J. 2016, 22, 1292–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Nakashima, T.; Iwatsuki, M.; Ochiai, J.; Kamiya, Y.; Nagai, K.; Matsumoto, A.; Ishiyama, A.; Otoguro, K.; Shiomi, K.; Takahashi, Y.; et al. Mangromicins A and B: Structure and antitrypanosomal activity of two new cyclopentadecane compounds from Lechevalieria aerocolonigenes K10-0216. J. Antibiot. 2013, 67, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Nakashima, T.; Kamiya, Y.; Iwatsuki, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Omura, S. Mangromicins, six new anti-oxidative agents isolated from a culture broth of the actinomycete, Lechevalieria aerocolonigenes K10-0216. J. Antibiot. 2014, 67, 533–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Takada, H.; Yamada, T.; Hirose, T.; Ishihara, T.; Nakashima, T.; Takahashi, Y.K.; Omura, S.; Sunazuka, T. Total Synthesis and Determination of the Absolute Configuration of Naturally Occurring Mangromicin A, with Potent Antitrypanosomal Activity. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 230–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lu, S.; Sun, P.; Li, T.; Kurtán, T.; Mándi, A.; Antus, S.; Krohn, K.; Draeger, S.; Schulz, B.; Yi, Y.; et al. Bioactive Nonanolide Derivatives Isolated from the Endophytic Fungus Cytospora sp. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 9699–9710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ehrlich, G.; Stark, C.B.W. Total Synthesis of Cytospolide D and Its Biomimetic Conversion to Cytospolides M, O, and Q. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 4802–4805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Chatterjee, S.; Mandal, G.H.; Goswami, R.K. Total Synthesis of Cytospolide Q. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 7350–7357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ehrlich, G.; Stark, C.B.W. Synthesis of Cytospolide Analogues and Late-State Diversification Thereof. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 3132–3147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Murakami, M.; Matsuda, H.; Makabe, K.; Yamaguchi, K. Oscillariolide, a novel macrolide from a blue-green alga Oscillatoria sp. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 2391–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Williamson, R.T.; Boulanger, A.; Vulpanovici, A.; Roberts, M.A.; Gerwick, W.H. Structure and Absolute Stereochemistry of Phormidolide, a New Toxic Metabolite from the Marine Cyanobacterium Phormidium sp. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7927–7936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lam, N.Y.S.; Muir, G.; Challa, V.R.; Britton, R.; Paterson, I. A counterintuitive stereochemical outcome from a chelation-controlled vinylmetal aldehyde addition leads to the configurational reassignment of phormidolide A. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 9717–9720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ndukwe, I.E.; Wang, X.; Lam, N.Y.S.; Ermanis, K.; Alexander, K.L.; Bertin, M.J.; Martin, G.E.; Muir, G.; Paterson, I.; Britton, R.; et al. Synergism of anisotropic and computational NMR methods reveals the likely configuration of phormidolide A. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 7565–7568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lorente, A.; Gil, A.; Fernández, R.; Cuevas, C.; Albericio, F.; Álvarez, M. Phormidolides B and C, Cytotoxic Agents from the Sea: Enantioselective Synthesis of the Macrocyclic Core. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Gil, A.; Lorente, A.; Albericio, F.; Alvarez, M. Stereoselective Allylstannane Addition for a Convergent Synthesis of a Complex Molecule. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 6246–6249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Gil, A.; Giarrusso, M.; Lamariano-Merketegi, J.; Lorente, A.; Albericio, F.; Álvarez, M. Toward the Synthesis of Phormidolides. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 2351–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Gil, A.; Lamariano-Merketegi, J.; Lorente, A.; Albericio, F.; Álvarez, M. Enantioselective Synthesis of the Polyhydroxylated Chain of Oscillariolide and Phormidolides A–C. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 4485–4487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Gil, A.; Lamariano-Merketegi, J.; Lorente, A.; Albericio, F.; Álvarez, M. Synthesis of (E)-4-Bromo-3-methoxybut-3-en-2-one, the Key Fragment in the Polyhydroxylated Chain Common to Oscillariolide and Phormidolides A-C. Chem. A Eur. J. 2016, 22, 7033–7035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Kim, M.C.; Winter, J.M.; Cullum, R.; Li, Z.; Fenical, W. Complementary Genomic, Bioinformatics, and Chemical Approaches Facilitate the Absolute Structure Assignment of Ionostatin, a Linear Polyketide from a Rare Marine-Derived Actinomycete. ACS Chem. Biol. 2020, 15, 2507–2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Liu, H.; Lin, S.; Jacobsen, K.M.; Poulsen, T.B. Chemical Syntheses and Chemical Biology of Carboxyl Polyether Ionophores: Recent Highlights. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 13630–13642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kevin, D.A., II; Meujo, D.A.F.; Hamann, M.T. Polyether ionophores: Broad-spectrum and promising biologically active molecules for the control of drug-resistant bacteria and parasites. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2009, 4, 109–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Rutkowski, J.; Brzezinski, B. Structures and Properties of Naturally Occurring Polyether Antibiotics. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 162513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Toeplitz, B.K.; Cohen, A.I.; Funke, P.T.; Parker, W.L.; Gougoutas, J.Z. Structure of ionomycin-A novel diacidic polyether antibiotic having high affinity for calcium ions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 3344–3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Huczyński, A. Polyether ionophores—Promising bioactive molecules for cancer therapy. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 7002–7010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Igarashi, Y.; Zhou, T.; Sato, S.; Matsumoto, T.; Yu, L.; Oku, N. Akaeolide, a Carbocyclic Polyketide from Marine-Derived Streptomyces. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 5678–5681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Zhou, T.; Komaki, H.; Ichikawa, N.; Hosoyama, A.; Sato, S.; Igarashi, Y. Biosynthesis of Akaeolide and Lorneic Acids and Annotation of Type I Polyketide Synthase Gene Clusters in the Genome of Streptomyces sp. NPS554. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 581–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Blunt, J.W.; Hartshorn, M.P.; McLennan, T.J.; Munro, M.H.G.; Robinson, W.T.; Yorke, S.C. Thyrsiferol: A squalene-derived metabolite of Laurencia thyrsifera. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 19, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Juang, S.-H.; Chiang, C.-Y.; Liang, F.-P.; Chan, H.-H.; Yang, J.-S.; Wang, S.-H.; Lin, Y.-C.; Kuo, P.-C.; Shen, M.-R.; Thang, T.D.; et al. Mechanistic Study of Tetrahydrofuran- acetogenins In Triggering Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Response-apotoposis in Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. van Lint, M.J.; Hall, M.; Faber, K.; van Spanning, R.J.M.; Ruijter, E.; Orru, R.V.A. Stereoselective Chemoenzymatic Cascade Synthesis of the bis-THF Core of Acetogenins. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 2019, 1092–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Öztunç, A.; Imre, S.; Lotter, H.; Wagner, H. Two C15 bromoallenes from the red alga Laurencia obtusa. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 255–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Guella, G.; Chiasera, G.; Mancini, I.; Öztunç, A.; Pietra, F. Twelve-Membered O-Bridged Cyclic Ethers of Red Seaweeds in the Genus Laurencia Exist in Solution as Slowly Interconverting Conformers. Chem. A Eur. J. 1997, 3, 1223–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Guella, G.; Mancini, I.; Öztunç, A.; Pietra, F. Conformational Bias in Macrocyclic Ethers and Observation of High Solvolytic Reactivity at a Masked Furfuryl (=2-Furylmethyl) C-Atom. Helv. Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 336–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Braddock, D.C.; Rzepa, H.S. Structural Reassignment of Obtusallenes V, VI, and VII by GIAO-Based Density Functional Prediction. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 728–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Braddock, D.C.; Millan, D.S.; Pérez-Fuertes, Y.; Pouwer, R.H.; Sheppard, R.N.; Solanki, S.; White, A.J.P. Bromonium Ion Induced Transannular Oxonium Ion Formation−Fragmentation in Model Obtusallene Systems and Structural Reassignment of Obtusallenes V−VII. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 1835–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Braddock, D.C.; Bhuva, R.; Millan, D.S.; Pérez-Fuertes, Y.; Roberts, C.A.; Sheppard, R.N.; Solanki, S.; Stokes, E.S.E.; White, A.J.P. A Biosynthetically-Inspired Synthesis of the Tetrahydrofuran Core of Obtusallenes II and IV. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 445–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Arthuis, M.; Beaud, R.; Gandon, V.; Roulland, E. Counteranion-Directed Catalysis in the Tsuji-Trost Reaction: Stereocontrolled Access to 2,5-Disubstituted 3-Hydroxy-Tetrahydrofurans. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10510–10514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Clarke, J.; Bonney, K.J.; Yaqoob, M.; Solanki, S.; Rzepa, H.S.; White, A.J.P.; Millan, D.S.; Braddock, D.C. Epimeric Face-Selective Oxidations and Diastereodivergent Transannular Oxonium Ion Formation Fragmentations: Computational Modeling and Total Syntheses of 12-Epoxyobtusallene IV, 12-Epoxyobtusallene II, Obtusallene X, Marilzabicycloallene C, and Marilzabicycloallene D. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 9539–9552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Kubota, T.; Sakuma, Y.; Shimbo, K.; Tsuda, M.; Nakano, M.; Uozumi, Y.; Kobayashi, J. Amphezonol A, a novel polyhydroxyl metabolite from marine dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 4369–4371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Chen, W.; Liu, H.; Long, J.; Tao, H.; Lin, X.; Liao, S.; Yang, B.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J. Asperpentenone A, A novel polyketide isolated from the deep-sea derived fungus Aspergillus sp. SCSIO 41024. Phytochem. Lett. 2020, 35, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Patil, A.D.; Freyer, A.J.; Bean, M.F.; Carte, B.K.; Westley, J.W.; Johnson, R.K.; Lahouratate, P. The plakortones, novel bicyclic lactones from the sponge Plakortis halichondrioides: Activators of cardiac SR-Ca2+-pumping ATPase. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 377–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Cafieri, F.; Fattorusso, E.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O.; di Rosa, M.; Ianaro, A. Metabolites from the sponge plakortis simplex. II.: Isolation of four bioactive lactone compounds and of a novel related amino acid. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 13831–13840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Chianese, G.; Yu, H.-B.; Yang, F.; Sirignano, C.; Luciano, P.; Han, B.-N.; Khan, S.; Lin, H.-W.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O. PPAR Modulating Polyketides from a Chinese Plakortis simplex and Clues on the Origin of Their Chemodiversity. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 5135–5143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Yong, K.W.L.; de Voss, J.J.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Garson, M.J. Configurational Assignment of Cyclic Peroxy Metabolites Provides an Insight into Their Biosynthesis: Isolation of Plakortolides, seco-Plakortolides, and Plakortones from the Australian Marine Sponge Plakinastrella clathrata. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 194–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Akiyama, M.; Isoda, Y.; Nishimoto, M.; Narazaki, M.; Oka, H.; Kuboki, A.; Ohira, S. Total synthesis and absolute stereochemistry of plakortone E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 2287–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Semmelhack, M.F.; Hooley, R.J.; Kraml, C.M. Synthesis of Plakortone B and Analogs. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5203–5206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Paddon-Jones, G.C.; Hungerford, N.L.; Hayes, P.; Kitching, W. Efficient Palladium(II)-Mediated Construction of Functionalized Plakortone Cores. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1905–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Hayes, P.Y.; Kitching, W. Total Synthesis and Absolute Stereochemistry of Plakortone D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9718–9719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Hayes, P.Y.; Kitching, W. Synthesis in the Plakortone Series: Plakortone E. Heterocycles 2004, 35, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Xie, X.-G.; Wu, X.-W.; Lee, H.-K.; Peng, X.-S.; Wong, H.N.C. Total Synthesis of Plakortone B. Chem. A Eur. J. 2010, 16, 6933–6941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Sun, X.-Y.; Tian, X.-Y.; Li, Z.-W.; Peng, X.-S.; Wong, H.N.C. Total Synthesis of Plakortide E and Biomimetic Synthesis of Plakortone B. Chem. A Eur. J. 2011, 17, 5874–5880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Sugimura, H.; Sato, S.; Tokudome, K.; Yamada, T. Stereoselective Formation of Tetrahydrofuran Rings via [3 + 2] Annulation: Total Synthesis of Plakortone L. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 3384–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Li, J.; Li, C.; Riccio, R.; Lauro, G.; Bifulco, G.; Li, T.-J.; Tang, H.; Zhuang, C.-L.; Ma, H.; Sun, P.; et al. Chemistry and Selective Tumor Cell Growth Inhibitory Activity of Polyketides from the South China Sea Sponge Plakortis sp. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Structure of amphidinolides C, C2, C3, and F.
Figure 1. Structure of amphidinolides C, C2, C3, and F.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g001
Figure 2. Structure of amphidinolide C4.
Figure 2. Structure of amphidinolide C4.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g002
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the THF moiety in amphidinolides C and F by Fürstner.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the THF moiety in amphidinolides C and F by Fürstner.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch001
Figure 3. Structure of amphidinolide E.
Figure 3. Structure of amphidinolide E.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g003
Scheme 2. Synthesis of C10-C21 fragment of amphidinolide E.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of C10-C21 fragment of amphidinolide E.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch002
Figure 4. Structure of amphidinolide K.
Figure 4. Structure of amphidinolide K.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g004
Scheme 3. Synthesis of C9–C22 fragment of amphidinolide K.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of C9–C22 fragment of amphidinolide K.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch003
Figure 5. Structure of amphidinolide N.
Figure 5. Structure of amphidinolide N.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g005
Scheme 4. Synthesis of THF of amphidinolide N by Sasaki and Kuwahara.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of THF of amphidinolide N by Sasaki and Kuwahara.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch004
Scheme 5. Synthesis of THF fragment of amphidinolide N by Fuwa.
Scheme 5. Synthesis of THF fragment of amphidinolide N by Fuwa.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch005
Figure 6. Structure of isocaribenolide I and chlorohydrin.
Figure 6. Structure of isocaribenolide I and chlorohydrin.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g006
Figure 7. Structure of amphidinolides T.
Figure 7. Structure of amphidinolides T.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g007
Scheme 6. Retrosynthesis of amphidinolides T from a common intermediate.
Scheme 6. Retrosynthesis of amphidinolides T from a common intermediate.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch006
Scheme 7. Synthesis of THF fragment of amphidinolides T.
Scheme 7. Synthesis of THF fragment of amphidinolides T.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch007
Figure 8. Structure of haterumalides.
Figure 8. Structure of haterumalides.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g008
Figure 9. Structure of biselides.
Figure 9. Structure of biselides.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g009
Scheme 8. Synthesis of biselide A by Kigoshi, Hayakawa, and co-workers.
Scheme 8. Synthesis of biselide A by Kigoshi, Hayakawa, and co-workers.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch008
Scheme 9. Synthesis of THF moiety of biselide A in Britton’s total synthesis.
Scheme 9. Synthesis of THF moiety of biselide A in Britton’s total synthesis.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch009
Scheme 10. Reformatsky macrocyclization to biselide A by Britton and coworkers.
Scheme 10. Reformatsky macrocyclization to biselide A by Britton and coworkers.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch010
Figure 10. Initially proposed structure of chagosensine.
Figure 10. Initially proposed structure of chagosensine.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g010
Scheme 11. Synthesis of putative chagosensine.
Scheme 11. Synthesis of putative chagosensine.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch011
Figure 11. Structure of formosalides A and B.
Figure 11. Structure of formosalides A and B.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g011
Scheme 12. Synthesis of THF in formosalides.
Scheme 12. Synthesis of THF in formosalides.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch012
Scheme 13. Synthesis of formosalides by Fürstner.
Scheme 13. Synthesis of formosalides by Fürstner.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch013
Scheme 14. Synthesis of THF-containing fragment in formosalides by Mohapatra and co-workers.
Scheme 14. Synthesis of THF-containing fragment in formosalides by Mohapatra and co-workers.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch014
Figure 12. Structure of halichondrins, norhalichondrins and homohalichondrins.
Figure 12. Structure of halichondrins, norhalichondrins and homohalichondrins.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g012
Scheme 15. Key step in the total synthesis of halichondrins by Kishi.
Scheme 15. Key step in the total synthesis of halichondrins by Kishi.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch015
Scheme 16. Reverse approach to halichondrin B by Nicolaou.
Scheme 16. Reverse approach to halichondrin B by Nicolaou.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch016
Figure 13. Structure of the anticancer drug eribulin.
Figure 13. Structure of the anticancer drug eribulin.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g013
Figure 14. Structure of THF-containing iriomoteolides.
Figure 14. Structure of THF-containing iriomoteolides.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g014
Scheme 17. Retrosynthesis of iriomoteolide-2a.
Scheme 17. Retrosynthesis of iriomoteolide-2a.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch017
Scheme 18. Synthesis of contiguous THF in iriomoteolide-2a.
Scheme 18. Synthesis of contiguous THF in iriomoteolide-2a.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch018
Scheme 19. Engame to iriomoteolide-2a by Fuwa.
Scheme 19. Engame to iriomoteolide-2a by Fuwa.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch019
Figure 15. Structure of mandelalides.
Figure 15. Structure of mandelalides.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g015
Scheme 20. Synthesis of the trisubstituted THF in mandelalides.
Scheme 20. Synthesis of the trisubstituted THF in mandelalides.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch020
Scheme 21. Macrocyclization and final steps for the synthesis of mandelalide A.
Scheme 21. Macrocyclization and final steps for the synthesis of mandelalide A.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch021
Figure 16. Structure of mangromicins.
Figure 16. Structure of mangromicins.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g016
Scheme 22. Synthesis of THF segment of mangromicin A.
Scheme 22. Synthesis of THF segment of mangromicin A.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch022
Figure 17. Structure of cytospolides.
Figure 17. Structure of cytospolides.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g017
Scheme 23. Synthesis of cytospolides.
Scheme 23. Synthesis of cytospolides.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch023
Scheme 24. Retrosynthesis of cytospolide Q.
Scheme 24. Retrosynthesis of cytospolide Q.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch024
Scheme 25. Total synthesis of cytospolide Q.
Scheme 25. Total synthesis of cytospolide Q.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch025
Scheme 26. Synthesis of cytospolide analogues.
Scheme 26. Synthesis of cytospolide analogues.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch026
Figure 18. Structure of oscillariolide.
Figure 18. Structure of oscillariolide.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g018
Figure 19. Structure of phormidolide A.
Figure 19. Structure of phormidolide A.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g019
Figure 20. Structure of phormidolides B-D.
Figure 20. Structure of phormidolides B-D.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g020
Scheme 27. Retrosynthesis of phormidolides.
Scheme 27. Retrosynthesis of phormidolides.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch027
Scheme 28. Retrosynthesis of phormidolide macrocycle.
Scheme 28. Retrosynthesis of phormidolide macrocycle.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch028
Figure 21. Structure of ionostatin.
Figure 21. Structure of ionostatin.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g021
Figure 22. Structure of ionomycin.
Figure 22. Structure of ionomycin.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g022
Figure 23. Structure of akaeolide.
Figure 23. Structure of akaeolide.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g023
Scheme 29. Synthesis of bis-THF core of acetogenins.
Scheme 29. Synthesis of bis-THF core of acetogenins.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch029
Figure 24. Structures of tetrahydrofuran-containing obtusallenes II-VII.
Figure 24. Structures of tetrahydrofuran-containing obtusallenes II-VII.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g024
Scheme 30. One pot reaction for THF core of obtusallenes 157 and 159.
Scheme 30. One pot reaction for THF core of obtusallenes 157 and 159.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch030
Scheme 31. Synthesis of C8-C15 fragment of obtusallene 158.
Scheme 31. Synthesis of C8-C15 fragment of obtusallene 158.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch031
Scheme 32. Synthesis of obtusallene X (167).
Scheme 32. Synthesis of obtusallene X (167).
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch032
Figure 25. Structure of amphenozol A.
Figure 25. Structure of amphenozol A.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g025
Figure 26. Structure of asperpentenone A.
Figure 26. Structure of asperpentenone A.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g026
Figure 27. Structure of plakortones.
Figure 27. Structure of plakortones.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 g027
Scheme 33. Synthesis of plakortone core.
Scheme 33. Synthesis of plakortone core.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch033
Scheme 34. Total synthesis of plakortone B.
Scheme 34. Total synthesis of plakortone B.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch034
Scheme 35. Synthesis of plakortone B via plakortide E derivative.
Scheme 35. Synthesis of plakortone B via plakortide E derivative.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch035
Scheme 36. Synthesis of plakortone L.
Scheme 36. Synthesis of plakortone L.
Marinedrugs 20 00120 sch036
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernández-Peña, L.; Díez-Poza, C.; González-Andrés, P.; Barbero, A. The Tetrahydrofuran Motif in Polyketide Marine Drugs. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20020120

AMA Style

Fernández-Peña L, Díez-Poza C, González-Andrés P, Barbero A. The Tetrahydrofuran Motif in Polyketide Marine Drugs. Marine Drugs. 2022; 20(2):120. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20020120

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernández-Peña, Laura, Carlos Díez-Poza, Paula González-Andrés, and Asunción Barbero. 2022. "The Tetrahydrofuran Motif in Polyketide Marine Drugs" Marine Drugs 20, no. 2: 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20020120

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop