Next Article in Journal
Growth Factor-Free Vascularization of Marine-Origin Collagen Sponges Using Cryopreserved Stromal Vascular Fractions from Human Adipose Tissue
Previous Article in Journal
Nitrogen Starvation Enhances the Production of Saturated and Unsaturated Fatty Acids in Aurantiochytrium sp. PKU#SW8 by Regulating Key Biosynthetic Genes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 20
Issue 10
10.3390/md20100622
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Intratympanic Administration of Dieckol Prevents Ototoxic Hearing Loss

by
Hui Li
1,2,
Seung Ha Oh
1,2,
Hyeon-Cheol Shin
3 and
Myung-Whan Suh
2,*
1
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
2
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea
3
Center for Molecular Intelligence, The State University of New York, Incheon 21985, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2022, 20(10), 622; https://doi.org/10.3390/md20100622
Submission received: 20 July 2022 / Revised: 22 September 2022 / Accepted: 24 September 2022 / Published: 30 September 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Objective. Systemic administration of dieckol reportedly ameliorates acute hearing loss. In this study, dieckol was delivered to the inner ear by the intratympanic route. The functional and anatomic effects and safety of dieckol were assessed using the rat ototoxicity model. Materials and methods. Dieckol in a high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid vehicle (dieckol+vehicle group) or vehicle without dieckol (vehicle-only group) were randomly delivered into 12 ears intratympanically. Ototoxic hearing loss was induced by intravenous administration of cisplatin, gentamicin, and furosemide. The hearing threshold and surviving outer hair cells (OHC) were enumerated. Biocompatibility was assessed by serial endoscopy of the tympanic membrane (TM), and the histology of the TM and the base of bulla (BB) mucosa was quantitatively assessed. Results. The hearing threshold was significantly better (difference of 20 dB SPL) in the dieckol+vehicle group than in the vehicle-only group. The number of surviving OHCs was significantly greater in the dieckol+vehicle group than in the vehicle-only group. There were no signs of inflammation or infection in the ear. The thickness of the TM and the BB mucosa did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion. Intratympanic local delivery of dieckol may be a safe and effective method to prevent ototoxic hearing loss.

1. Introduction

More than 80% of children with cancer will be cured, but sequelae (such as hearing loss) after chemotherapy can degrade their quality of life [1]. A method of preventing or curing ototoxic hearing loss without affecting the chemotherapy outcome is thus needed. According to the Lancet clinical practice guidelines, only thiosulfate can reduce cisplatin-induced toxicity without decreasing survival [2]. However, the efficacy of thiosulfate in preventing acute hearing loss is not sufficient in patients with cancer other than non-metastatic hepatoblastoma [2]. A systemic steroid was formerly the standard first-line treatment for acute hearing loss, but its utility is unclear, according to a recent Cochrane Database Systemic Review [3]. There is no first-line treatment for sudden hearing loss that is strongly recommended by the American Academy of Otolaryngology [4]. An alternative approach is administering steroids locally in the middle ear via intratympanic (IT) injection [5,6]. Because the drug is delivered only into the ear, it has no systemic effect. Compared to intraperitoneal (IP) or intravenous (IV) administration, a higher concentration of the drug can be delivered to the inner ear by IT injection [7]. Local drug delivery is accepted for the treatment of sudden hearing loss [4], but its ability to prevent and resolve ototoxic hearing loss is unclear.
The main mechanism of ototoxic hearing loss is excessive oxidative stress. Production of reactive oxidative species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) induce hair cell loss [8]. Antioxidants such as glutathione may prevent this loss by maintaining the balance between oxidative stress and antioxidants [9]. Under abnormal conditions, such as administering ototoxic medication, disruption of the balance between oxidative stress and antioxidants leads to acute sensorineural hearing loss. Exogenous antioxidants such as N-acetylcysteine (NAC) reportedly have preventative and/or therapeutic effects [10]. Hearing loss was prevented by NAC administration prior to cisplatin treatment [11]. Other antioxidants have also shown promising outcomes [8,12], but it is not clear which antioxidant is most helpful. The route of administration is another issue—NAC may reduce the effect of cisplatin, resulting in worse cancer outcomes [13]. Therefore, a potent antioxidant that prevents ototoxic hearing loss and can be delivered locally into the ear is needed [14].
Seaweeds with a variety of phytochemical and pharmacological properties are used as substitutes for drugs [15]. Ecklonia cava is an edible brown alga found mainly in South Korea, Japan, and China [16]. The purified polyphenolic extract from E. cava (PPEE) contains several phytochemicals, including dieckol, eckol, and phlorofucofuroeckol-A, referred to as eckols [17]. Among them, dieckol, a potent antioxidant, is the main bioactive ingredient. Dieckol suppresses the formation of ROS [18,19,20,21,22,23]. It has therapeutic effects on chronic inflammation, oxidative stress and circulatory dysfunction, central nervous system damage, and neurodegenerative diseases. An E. cava extract was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2008 (FDA-1995-S-0039-0176). Dieckol promotes recovery of the inner ear after ototoxic insult [24] and acute acoustic trauma [25]. The results are promising, particularly because there is no first-line treatment for acute hearing loss.
We evaluated the effect of dieckol on ototoxic hearing loss. To avoid systemic effects and enhance the local treatment effect, we delivered the drug via the IT route. Our hypothesis was that the antioxidant effect of IT-delivered dieckol would prevent ototoxic hearing loss and improve hearing outcomes.

2. Results

2.1. TM Endoscopy

The external auditory canal and tympanic membrane were observed by TM endoscopy. None of the 12 ears were inflamed in either group (Figure 1). In both groups, perforation closure was observed at 4.7 ± 1.6 and 4.2 ± 0.4 days after IT drug delivery in the dieckol+vehicle and vehicle-only groups, respectively. The time required for perforation healing was similar in the two groups (p = 0.937).

2.2. Hearing Threshold Based on the ABR

The hearing threshold was normal (<35 dB SPL at all three frequencies) in all rats before the experiment. At PHD 1, hearing had deteriorated in all rats (Figure 2). The degree of hearing deterioration was less in the dieckol+vehicle group than the vehicle-only group (p = 0.015 at PHD 1, p < 0.015 at PHD 4, p = 0.04 at PHD 8, p = 0.093 at PHD 12, p < 0.009 at PHD 21, p < 0.004 at PHD 30, and p < 0.009 at PHD 45) at 32 kHz. A significant difference at 8 kHz was observed on PHD 1 (p = 0.015). When the hearing at 32 kHz was compared between the control group and vehicle-only group, it was almost identical, with no statistical difference. The degree of hearing deterioration was less in the dieckol+vehicle group than the control group (p = 0.492 at PHD 1, p = 0.022 at PHD 4, p = 0.042 at PHD 8, p = 0.181 at PHD 12, p = 0.003 at PHD 21, p =0.002 at PHD 30, and p < 0.001 at PHD 45) at 32 kHz. As for the low to mid frequencies (8–16 kHz), the variability was very large, but a similar tendency was found.

2.3. Organ of Corti Surface Preparation and Hair Cell Number

The number of OHCs per 200 μm in the apical turn (8 kHz), the middle turn (16 kHz), the basal turn (32 kHz), and the hook portion are shown in Figure 3A. The basal turn (32 kHz) exhibited a superior treatment outcome (78.8 ± 1.7 cells/200 μm) compared to the vehicle-only group (72.9 ± 5.2 cells/200 μm, p = 0.002). The middle turn (16 kHz) also showed a superior treatment outcome (77.5 ± 5.7 cells/200 μm) compared to the vehicle-only group (56.4 ± 28.1 cells/200 μm, p = 0.009). In the apical turn (8 kHz) and the hook portion, the survival of OHCs in the dieckol+vehicle group (80.7 ± 23.4 cells/200 μm in the apical turn and 57.4 ± 29.9 cells/200 μm in the hook portion) was superior to that of the vehicle-only group (67.3 ± 20.7 cells/200 μm in the apical turn and 49.9 ± 23.4 μm in the hook portion), but this difference did not reach a statistical significance (Figure 3B).

2.4. Middle Ear Histology

The mean thickness of the TM was 2.0 ± 0.2 μm in the dieckol+vehicle group and 2.0 ± 0.3 μm in the vehicle-only group (Figure 4, p = 0.937). The mean thickness of the mucosa at the BB was 30.9 ± 12.3 μm in the dieckol+vehicle group and 27.7 ± 9.5 μm in the vehicle-only group (Figure 4, p = 0.394).

3. Discussion

In this study, IT delivery of dieckol reduced ototoxic hearing loss. The hearing threshold was significantly better in the dieckol+vehicle group compared to the vehicle-only group. The morphologies of cochlea OHCs were consistent with the auditory threshold results. That is, the number of surviving OHCs was significantly greater in the dieckol+vehicle group compared to the vehicle-only group. The functional and anatomic outcomes of dieckol treatment were clinically significant (approximately 20 dB hearing gain, effect size 2.19). Although dieckol is reportedly effective for noise-induced hearing loss [24], this is the first in vivo study to demonstrate its benefit in ototoxic hearing loss. Acute acoustic trauma tends to recover spontaneously, whereas ototoxic hearing loss is permanent. Therefore, the clinical implication of dieckol for ototoxic hearing loss may be greater than for acute acoustic trauma.
The mechanism by which dieckol prevents ototoxic hearing loss is hypothetical—its antioxidant activity likely plays a major role. The main mechanism of ototoxicity of aminoglycosides is the production and accumulation of ROS [26,27], leading to HC apoptosis [28,29,30,31]. Oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, and autophagy are important in the pathogenesis of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity [8]. When cisplatin is used in combination with a diuretic (furosemide), even a small amount of cisplatin can cause hair cell damage and increase the loss of OHCs [32]. The application of antioxidants, which inhibit oxidases [33], reduces the production of ROS [34,35,36,37], thereby preventing the death of HCs caused by ototoxic drugs. Dieckol and other eckols have strong antioxidant activities, which may be the key to preventing ototoxic hearing loss. In vivo and in vitro studies have shown that eckols have ROS scavenging properties; dieckol upregulates antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione peroxidase and superoxide dismutase (SOD) [38] and downregulates pro-inflammatory enzymes, such as NO synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) [39]. Additionally, dieckol may have anti-inflammatory [40,41], cell-protective [42,43], and neuroprotective functions [44]. These additional functions may have contributed to the prevention of ototoxic hearing loss observed in this study.
The advantages of IT drug delivery include (1) reduced systemic metabolism, (2) specific drug delivery to the inner ear, and (3) a higher concentration of drug [45]. Because of the unique physiological and anatomical characteristics of the inner ear organs, the blood–labyrinthine barrier (BLB) hampers drug delivery into the inner ear [46]. Dieckol administered systemically likely has poor penetration of the inner ear. We found that dieckol has a substantial effect when delivered via IT. Because it bypasses the BLB and systemic metabolism, IT delivery of dieckol may have a better treatment outcome, with fewer systemic adverse effects, compared to IP or IV. Compared to our former study [25], hearing gain was approximately 20 dB with IT delivery compared to ≤10 dB with IP delivery. However, the hearing loss animal models were different, hampering the comparison of treatment outcomes.
The downside of IT drug delivery is middle ear infection. Various biocompatible materials and drugs that are safe in other organs can cause inflammation and/or infection in the structurally vulnerable TM [47,48]. Therefore, we evaluated the macroscopic and microscopic changes induced by IT delivery of dieckol. Endoscopy showed good recovery of the TM in all rats. None developed inflammation, infection, or perforation of the TM. The incidence of adverse reactions was 0% in both groups. The histological findings of the middle ear were similar in the two groups. The thickness of the TM and mucosa was not affected by dieckol. The thickness of the TM in untreated normal rats is reported to be 2.1 ± 1.0 μm [49], and that of the dieckol+vehicle group was 2.0 ± 0.2 μm, indicating that dieckol+vehicle had a negligible effect on TM inflammation and/or infection.
IT delivery of dieckol resulted in a better hearing outcome at the high frequency (32 kHz) than at the middle and low frequencies (16 and 8 kHz). This is likely to be because of the diffusion property of the round/oval window [50]. Dieckol in the middle ear must migrate into the inner ear through the round and oval windows. During this migration, dieckol is thought to enter the inner ear by diffusion. The drug concentration will be higher in the basal turn (32 kHz, location of the oval and round windows) compared to the middle (16 kHz) or apical (8 kHz) turn. A concentration gradient between the basal and apical turn has been reported for other drugs, such as steroids and gentamicin [51]. According to our hypothesis, the hearing outcome should be best in the basal turn (32 kHz) because the dieckol concentration is highest at this location. A better treatment outcome at high frequencies has been documented for the delivery of other drugs via the IT route [49,52].
This study had several limitations. A larger number of animals would have increased the statistical power. However, we identified a marked difference between the two groups in hearing threshold and HC count. The mean difference between the dieckol+vehicle group and vehicle-only group in PHD45 was 22.5 dB. The standard deviation of the two groups was 8.01 and 12.11, respectively. When the alpha error was set as 0.05 and the beta error was set as 0.2, the required sample size turned out to be 4 samples for each group. Accordingly, the statistical power seems to be sufficient despite the small sample size, thanks to the large mean difference and small standard deviation. This study is a proof-of-concept pilot study that points out the possibility of delivering dieckol by the IT route as a novel approach that has never been reported in the literature. Further studies should be repeated with a larger sample size for the drug to be considered for any human trial. We did not evaluate the mechanism by which dieckol promoted hearing recovery. Instead, we focused on expanding the indication and mode of administration because the mechanism has been established [25]. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of delivering dieckol via the IT route to treat ototoxic hearing loss. Several concentrations of dieckol should have been tested. The concentration of dieckol was not titrated to the optimum therapeutic range as in our prior in vitro study [24]. The in vitro and in vivo conditions may differ, and different concentrations of dieckol may result in diverse treatment outcomes. The concentration of dieckol in this study may not be the most optimal concentration, and further studies are needed. We plan to evaluate these issues in a future study.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Experimental Animals

All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Research Committee of Seoul National University Hospital, and animal care was supported and supervised by the institution (IACUC16-0243-01A02). Twenty-two ears of male Sprague-Dawley rats (6 weeks of age; 189–228 g) were used. The rats were anesthetized with zoletil and xylazine. Dieckol was delivered to the inner ear via IT injection. Under a surgical microscope, one ear of each rat was randomly selected for administration of dieckol in a hyaluronic acid (HA)-based vehicle. The other ear (control ear) was administered HA vehicle only. The ears were divided into the dieckol+vehicle group (n = 6) and vehicle-only group (n = 6), and control group (n = 10) for comparison. As for the control group, no treatment was performed after induction of ototoxic hearing loss. The age-matched control group was recruited from our former study that was performed with the same experimental settings [50].

4.2. IT Drug Delivery

The IT drug delivery method is reported elsewhere [49]. In brief, an Angiocath Plus 24-gauge needle (BD, Sandy, UT, USA) was connected to a 1 mL syringe (KovaxSyringe 1 mL, Korea Vaccine Co., Seoul, Korea) with a mini-extension tube (Mini-Volume Line, Insung Medical, Seoul, Korea). An air vent was first made in the anterior superior quadrant of the tympanic membrane (TM). The syringe was inserted carefully at a low speed (∼60 µL/10 s). The injection was stopped when the drug and vehicle completely filled the middle ear (bulla) or leaked through the air vent. The volume injected into the middle ear cavity was similar (40–60 μL) in the two groups. After injecting the drug and vehicle into one ear, the other ear, within 5 min, was injected with the vehicle (without drug), respectively. To prevent positional effects, rats were placed in a straight prone position without leaning to the left or right until the experiment was concluded. The final day of IT drug delivery was considered post-injection day (PID) 0.

4.3. Induction of Ototoxic Hearing Loss

On days 3 and 4 after IT drug delivery, intravenous injection of cisplatin (2 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/mL), gentamicin (120 mg/kg, 40 mg/mL) and furosemide (90 mg/kg, 10 mg/mL) for two consecutive days induced ototoxic hearing loss. Cisplatin and gentamicin solutions were slowly (0.2 mL/2 min) injected through the vein on the lateral side of the tail using an Angiocath Plus 24-gauge needle. Five minutes after flushing the tube with normal saline (0.3 mL), furosemide was slowly (0.2 mL/2 min) injected. The last day of ototoxic hearing loss induction was considered post-hearing loss day (PHD) 0. Therefore, PID 4 was the same as PHD 0.

4.4. Preparation of Dieckol and Vehicle

Dieckol was a light brown powder and was provided by Botamedi, Inc. (Jeju, Korea); its specifications are available elsewhere [25]. Briefly, the whole E. cava plant was collected off the coast of Jeju Island, South Korea. Dried E. cava powder was extracted with 70% aqueous ethanol and partitioned between water and ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate fraction was subjected to octadecylsilyl (ODS) column chromatography followed by gel filtration in a Sephadex LH-20 column equilibrated with methanol. Final purification was accomplished by HPLC (Waters Spherisorb S10 ODS2 column (20 × 250 mm); eluent, 30% methanol; flow rate, 3.5 mL/min) to isolate dieckol (98.5 wt%). As the vehicle, 2 wt%, 5000–10,000 kDa high-molecular-weight HA was used (MNH Bio, Hwaseong, Korea). The dieckol+vehicle was prepared as follows: 0.2 g of dieckol was mixed with 3 mL of 10% ethanol and 0.9 mL of normal saline at 37 °C and centrifuged for 30 min. Next, 16.1 mL of high-molecular-weight HA were stirred into the solution for 24 h.

4.5. Endoscopy of the Tympanic Membrane (TM)

A 2.7-mm-diameter endoscope (GD-060, Chammed, Gunpo, Korea) was connected to a smartphone (iPhone 4, Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA) to photograph the external auditory canal and TM of the rats. We evaluated signs of inflammation, infection, swelling, redness, perforations, and other side effects. TM endoscopic measurements were performed at PID 0, 1, 5, 8, 12, 16, 25, 34, and 49.

4.6. Assessment of Hearing Threshold Based on the Auditory Brainstem Response

Using the Smart EP system (Intelligent Hearing Systems, Miami, FL, USA), auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds were evaluated at 8, 16, and 32 kHz. The rats were anesthetized as above. Subdermal needle electrodes were inserted at the vertex (active electrode) and behind the ipsilateral ear (reference electrode) and contralateral ear (ground electrode). The speaker was aligned with the external auditory canal, and the earphone tube was inserted gently into the ear canal. Hearing thresholds were assessed by evaluating the lowest stimulus level that produced clear III/V and SN10 (slow, negative wave) waves. ABR testing started at 90 dB SPL and decreased in 5 dB increments. ABRs were evaluated at PRE, PID 0, and PHD 1, 4, 8, 12, 21, 30, and 45.

4.7. Organ of Corti Surface Preparation and Hair Cell Enumeration

On the last day of the experiment (PID 49), the animals were anesthetized, and the cochleae were harvested, perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered solution (PBS), and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C for 24 h. Organ of Corti surface preparation was performed under a stereoscopic microscope (SZX7, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The cochlea was stained with phalloidin (Alexa Fluor 546, Life Technologies, OR, USA) and rinsed three times with PBS for 5 min each. Hair cells were observed by z-stacking with a confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP8, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Three rows of outer hair cells (OHC) were counted within 200 μm per turn. Two separate locations per turn were used for measurements. If hair cells were empty or absent in photomicrographs, they were considered non-viable.

4.8. Middle Ear Histology

On PID 49, the animals were anesthetized, and the middle ear was harvested, perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 2 h at room temperature. After decalcification with 0.1 M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (pH 7.4) for 3 weeks, the bullae were embedded in paraffin wax, cut into 5-μm-thick sections, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The location of the TM was identified in a consistent manner by locating the malleus head and its fibrous connection to the TM. The mucosa at the base of the bulla (BB) was evaluated. Using a light microscope (CX31, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), the thicknesses of the TM and BB mucosa were measured using DP2-BSW software (Olympus).

4.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 25.0; SPSS Inc., IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables are expressed as means ± standard deviations. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare outcomes. A non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test was used because the data were not normally distributed, and the sample size was smaller than 20 in each group. p-values < 0.05 were considered to denote statistical significance.

Author Contributions

H.L., S.H.O., H.-C.S. and M.-W.S. made substantial contributions to the design of the work, data acquisition, data analysis, data interpretation, drafting the work, and revising it. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1C1B3005431).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Animal Research Committee of Seoul National University Hospital (IACUC16-0243-C1A02, approved on 28-12-2016).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Botamedi Inc. for providing dieckol.

Conflicts of Interest

H.L. and M.-W.S. hold a patent related to a hyaluronic acid-based drug delivery vehicle (Korean Intellectual Property application number 10–2020–0012749).

References

  1. Oeffinger, K.C.; Mertens, A.C.; Sklar, C.A.; Kawashima, T.; Hudson, M.M.; Meadows, A.T.; Friedman, D.L.; Marina, N.; Hobbie, W.; Kadan-Lottick, N.S.; et al. Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355, 1572–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Freyer, D.R.; Brock, P.R.; Chang, K.W.; Dupuis, L.L.; Epelman, S.; Knight, K.; Mills, D.; Phillips, R.; Potter, E.; Risby, D.; et al. Prevention of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in children and adolescents with cancer: A clinical practice guideline. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2020, 4, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wei, B.P.; Stathopoulos, D.; O’Leary, S. Steroids for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013, 7, CD003998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chandrasekhar, S.S.; Tsai Do, B.S.; Schwartz, S.R.; Bontempo, L.J.; Faucett, E.A.; Finestone, S.A.; Hollingsworth, D.B.; Kelley, D.M.; Kmucha, S.T.; Moonis, G.; et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss (Update). Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2019, 161 (Suppl. S1), S1–S45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shafik, A.G.; Elkabarity, R.H.; Thabet, M.T.; Soliman, N.B.; Kalleny, N.K. Effect of intratympanic dexamethasone administration on cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in adult guinea pigs. Auris Nasus Larynx 2013, 40, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hill, G.W.; Morest, D.K.; Parham, K. Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity: Effect of intratympanic dexamethasone injections. Otol. Neurotol. 2008, 29, 1005–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bird, P.A.; Begg, E.J.; Zhang, M.; Keast, A.T.; Murray, D.P.; Balkany, T.J. Intratympanic versus intravenous delivery of methylprednisolone to cochlear perilymph. Otol. Neurotol. 2007, 28, 1124–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, D.; Gu, J.; Chen, Y.; Kang, W.; Wang, X.; Wu, H. Current Strategies to Combat Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hazlitt, R.A.; Min, J.; Zuo, J. Progress in the Development of Preventative Drugs for Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 5512–5524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Callejo, A.; Sedo-Cabezon, L.; Juan, I.D.; Llorens, J. Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity: Effects, Mechanisms and Protection Strategies. Toxics 2015, 3, 268–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Dickey, D.T.; Wu, Y.J.; Muldoon, L.L.; Neuwelt, E.A. Protection against cisplatin-induced toxicities by N-acetylcysteine and sodium thiosulfate as assessed at the molecular, cellular, and in vivo levels. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005, 314, 1052–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chirtes, F.; Albu, S. Prevention and restoration of hearing loss associated with the use of cisplatin. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 925485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wu, Y.J.; Muldoon, L.L.; Neuwelt, E.A. The chemoprotective agent N-acetylcysteine blocks cisplatin-induced apoptosis through caspase signaling pathway. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005, 312, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Choe, W.T.; Chinosornvatana, N.; Chang, K.W. Prevention of cisplatin ototoxicity using transtympanic N-acetylcysteine and lactate. Otol. Neurotol. 2004, 25, 910–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Haq, S.H.; Al-Ruwaished, G.; Al-Mutlaq, M.A.; Naji, S.A.; Al-Mogren, M.; Al-Rashed, S.; Ain, Q.T.; Al-Amro, A.A.; Al-Mussallam, A. Antioxidant, anticancer activity and phytochemical analysis of green algae, Chaetomorpha collected from the Arabian Gulf. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kim, S.K.; Lee, D.Y.; Jung, W.K.; Kim, J.H.; Choi, I.; Park, S.G.; Seo, S.K.; Lee, S.W.; Lee, C.M.; Yea, S.S.; et al. Effects of Ecklonia cava ethanolic extracts on airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation in a murine asthma model: Role of suppressor of cytokine signaling. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2008, 62, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, Y.; Fu, X.; Duan, D.; Liu, X.; Xu, J.; Gao, X. Extraction and Identification of Phlorotannins from the Brown Alga, Sargassum fusiforme (Harvey) Setchell. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Athukorala, Y.; Jung, W.-K.; Vasanthan, T.; Jeon, Y.-J. An anticoagulative polysaccharide from an enzymatic hydrolysate of Ecklonia cava. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 66, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, Y.; Qian, Z.-J.; Ryu, B.; Lee, S.-H.; Kim, M.-M.; Kim, S.-K. Chemical components and its antioxidant properties in vitro: An edible marine brown alga, Ecklonia cava. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 1963–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kang, I.-J.; Jeon, Y.E.; Yin, X.F.; Nam, J.-S.; You, S.G.; Hong, M.S.; Jang, B.G.; Kim, M.-J. Butanol extract of Ecklonia cava prevents production and aggregation of beta-amyloid, and reduces beta-amyloid mediated neuronal death. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 2252–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yoon, J.-S.; Yadunandam, A.K.; Kim, S.-J.; Woo, H.-C.; Kim, H.-R.; Kim, G.-D. Dieckol, isolated from Ecklonia stolonifera, induces apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma Hep3B cells. J. Nat. Med. 2013, 67, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Choi, H.-J.; Park, J.-H.; Lee, B.H.; Chee, H.Y.; Lee, K.B.; Oh, S.-M. Suppression of NF-κB by dieckol extracted from Ecklonia cava negatively regulates LPS induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase gene. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 173, 957–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jung, H.A.; Jung, H.J.; Jeong, H.Y.; Kwon, H.J.; Ali, M.Y.; Choi, J.S. Phlorotannins isolated from the edible brown alga Ecklonia stolonifera exert anti-adipogenic activity on 3T3-L1 adipocytes by downregulating C/EBPα and PPARγ. Fitoterapia 2014, 92, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chang, M.Y.; Han, S.Y.; Shin, H.-C.; Byun, J.Y.; Rah, Y.C.; Park, M.K. Protective effect of a purified polyphenolic extract from Ecklonia cava against noise-induced hearing loss: Prevention of temporary threshold shift. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2016, 87, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Woo, H.; Kim, M.-K.; Park, S.; Han, S.-H.; Shin, H.-C.; Kim, B.-g.; Oh, S.-H.; Suh, M.-W.; Lee, J.-H.; Park, M.-K. Effect of Phlorofucofuroeckol A and Dieckol Extracted from Ecklonia cava on Noise-induced Hearing Loss in a Mouse Model. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huang, T.; Cheng, A.G.; Stupak, H.; Liu, W.; Kim, A.; Staecker, H.; Lefebvre, P.P.; Malgrange, B.; Kopke, R.; Moonen, G.; et al. Oxidative stress-induced apoptosis of cochlear sensory cells: Otoprotective strategies. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2000, 18, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Balaban, R.S.; Nemoto, S.; Finkel, T. Mitochondria, oxidants, and aging. Cell 2005, 120, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mangiardi, D.A.; McLaughlin-Williamson, K.; May, K.E.; Messana, E.P.; Mountain, D.C.; Cotanche, D.A. Progression of hair cell ejection and molecular markers of apoptosis in the avian cochlea following gentamicin treatment. J. Comp. Neurol. 2004, 475, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Coffin, A.B.; Rubel, E.W.; Raible, D.W. Bax, Bcl2, and p53 differentially regulate neomycin- and gentamicin-induced hair cell death in the zebrafish lateral line. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2013, 14, 645–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, S.; Yu, H.; Yu, H.; Honglin, M.; Ni, W.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, L.; He, Y.; Xue, Z.; Ni, Y.; et al. Inhibition of the activation and recruitment of microglia-like cells protects against neomycin-induced ototoxicity. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015, 51, 252–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, L.; Chen, Y.; Qi, J.; Zhang, Y.; He, Y.; Ni, W.; Li, W.; Zhang, S.; Sun, S.; Taketo, M.M.; et al. Wnt activation protects against neomycin-induced hair cell damage in the mouse cochlea. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Xia, L.; Chen, Z.; Su, K.; Yin, S.; Wang, J. Comparison of cochlear cell death caused by cisplatin, alone and in combination with furosemide. Toxicol. Pathol. 2014, 42, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kim, H.J.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, S.J.; Oh, G.S.; Moon, H.D.; Kwon, K.B.; Park, C.; Park, B.H.; Lee, H.K.; Chung, S.Y.; et al. Roles of NADPH oxidases in cisplatin-induced reactive oxygen species generation and ototoxicity. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 3933–3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sha, S.H.; Schacht, J. Antioxidants attenuate gentamicin-induced free radical formation in vitro and ototoxicity in vivo: D-methionine is a potential protectant. Hear. Res. 2000, 142, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kawamoto, K.; Sha, S.H.; Minoda, R.; Izumikawa, M.; Kuriyama, H.; Schacht, J.; Raphael, Y. Antioxidant gene therapy can protect hearing and hair cells from ototoxicity. Mol. Ther. 2004, 9, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kim, S.J.; Park, C.; Han, A.L.; Youn, M.J.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, Y.; Kim, E.S.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, J.K.; Lee, H.K.; et al. Ebselen attenuates cisplatin-induced ROS generation through Nrf2 activation in auditory cells. Hear. Res. 2009, 251, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ding, D.; Qi, W.; Yu, D.; Jiang, H.; Han, C.; Kim, M.J.; Katsuno, K.; Hsieh, Y.H.; Miyakawa, T.; Salvi, R.; et al. Addition of exogenous NAD+ prevents mefloquine-induced neuroaxonal and hair cell degeneration through reduction of caspase-3-mediated apoptosis in cochlear organotypic cultures. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kang, M.C.; Kang, S.M.; Ahn, G.; Kim, K.N.; Kang, N.; Samarakoon, K.W.; Oh, M.C.; Lee, J.S.; Jeon, Y.J. Protective effect of a marine polyphenol, dieckol against carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver damage in mouse. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013, 35, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lee, S.H.; Han, J.S.; Heo, S.J.; Hwang, J.Y.; Jeon, Y.J. Protective effects of dieckol isolated from Ecklonia cava against high glucose-induced oxidative stress in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Toxicol. In Vitro 2010, 24, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, E.-J.; Moon, J.-Y.; Kim, M.-J.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, C.-S.; Lee, W.J.; Lee, N.H.; Hyun, C.-G. Inhibitory effect of Jeju endemic seaweeds on the production of pro-inflammatory mediators in mouse macrophage cell line RAW 264.7. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2010, 11, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Lopes, G.; Sousa, C.; Silva, L.R.; Pinto, E.; Andrade, P.B.; Bernardo, J.; Mouga, T.; Valentão, P. Can phlorotannins purified extracts constitute a novel pharmacological alternative for microbial infections with associated inflammatory conditions? PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kim, A.R.; Shin, T.S.; Lee, M.S.; Park, J.Y.; Park, K.E.; Yoon, N.Y.; Kim, J.S.; Choi, J.S.; Jang, B.C.; Byun, D.S.; et al. Isolation and identification of phlorotannins from Ecklonia stolonifera with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 3483–3489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yotsu-Yamashita, M.; Kondo, S.; Segawa, S.; Lin, Y.C.; Toyohara, H.; Ito, H.; Konoki, K.; Cho, Y.; Uchida, T. Isolation and structural determination of two novel phlorotannins from the brown alga Ecklonia kurome Okamura, and their radical scavenging activities. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 165–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jung, W.-K.; Heo, S.-J.; Jeon, Y.-J.; Lee, C.-M.; Park, Y.-M.; Byun, H.-G.; Choi, Y.H.; Park, S.-G.; Choi, I.-W. Inhibitory effects and molecular mechanism of dieckol isolated from marine brown alga on COX-2 and iNOS in microglial cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 4439–4446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, X.; Dellamary, L.; Fernandez, R.; Ye, Q.; LeBel, C.; Piu, F. Principles of inner ear sustained release following intratympanic administration. Laryngoscope 2011, 121, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Shi, X. Pathophysiology of the cochlear intrastrial fluid-blood barrier. Hear. Res. 2016, 338, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cho, J.-A.; Kim, B.J.; Hwang, Y.-J.; Woo, S.-W.; Noh, T.-S.; Suh, M.-W. Effect and Biocompatibility of a Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid and Polylactide-co-glycolide Microcapsule Vehicle in Intratympanic Drug Delivery for Treating Acute Acoustic Trauma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Park, M.; Hwang, Y.J.; Noh, T.S.; Woo, S.W.; Park, J.H.; Park, S.H.; Kim, M.S.; Suh, M.W. Biocompatibility and Therapeutic Effect of 3 Intra-Tympanic Drug Delivery Vehicles in Acute Acoustic Trauma. Audiol. Neurootol. 2020, 25, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, H.; Suh, M.W.; Oh, S.H. Dual Viscosity Mixture Vehicle for Intratympanic Dexamethasone Delivery Can Block Ototoxic Hearing Loss. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 701002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sadreev, I.I.; Burwood, G.W.S.; Flaherty, S.M.; Kim, J.; Russell, I.J.; Abdullin, T.I.; Lukashkin, A.N. Drug Diffusion Along an Intact Mammalian Cochlea. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Plontke, S.K.; Biegner, T.; Kammerer, B.; Delabar, U.; Salt, A.N. Dexamethasone concentration gradients along scala tympani after application to the round window membrane. Otol. Neurotol. 2008, 29, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yüksel Aslıer, N.G.; Tağaç, A.A.; Durankaya, S.M.; Çalışır, M.; Ersoy, N.; Kırkım, G.; Yurdakoç, K.; Bağrıyanık, H.A.; Yılmaz, O.; Sütay, S.; et al. Dexamethasone-loaded chitosan-based genipin-cross-linked hydrogel for prevention of cisplatin induced ototoxicity in Guinea pig model. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2019, 122, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Marinedrugs 20 00622 g001 550
Figure 1. Typical tympanic membrane (TM) endoscopy after intratympanic (IT) drug delivery. TM endoscopic measurements were performed 0, 1, 5, 8, 12, 16, 25, 34, and 49 days after IT drug delivery.
Figure 1. Typical tympanic membrane (TM) endoscopy after intratympanic (IT) drug delivery. TM endoscopic measurements were performed 0, 1, 5, 8, 12, 16, 25, 34, and 49 days after IT drug delivery.
Marinedrugs 20 00622 g001
Marinedrugs 20 00622 g002 550
Figure 2. Changes in hearing thresholds after ototoxic hearing loss. Auditory brainstem response thresholds were measured at 8, 16, and 32 kHz on post-hearing loss days (PHDs) 1, 4, 8, 12, 21, 30, and 45. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 compared to the vehicle-only group. Error bars represent standard deviations.
Figure 2. Changes in hearing thresholds after ototoxic hearing loss. Auditory brainstem response thresholds were measured at 8, 16, and 32 kHz on post-hearing loss days (PHDs) 1, 4, 8, 12, 21, 30, and 45. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 compared to the vehicle-only group. Error bars represent standard deviations.
Marinedrugs 20 00622 g002
Marinedrugs 20 00622 g003 550
Figure 3. Numbers of outer hair cells in the apical turn (8 kHz), middle turn (16 kHz), basal turn (32 kHz), and hook portion. Red, outer hair cells stained with phalloidin; green, absence of outer hair cells (A). In the apical turn (8 kHz) and the hook portion, the survival of OHCs in the dieckol+vehicle group (80.7 ± 23.4 cells/200 μm in the apical turn and 57.4 ± 29.9 cells/200 μm in the hook portion) was superior to that of the vehicle-only group (67.3 ± 20.7 cells/200 μm in the apical turn and 49.9 ± 23.4 μm in the hook portion), but this difference did not reach a statistical significance (B). ** p < 0.01. Scale bars represent 50 µm in (A). Error bars represent standard deviations.
Figure 3. Numbers of outer hair cells in the apical turn (8 kHz), middle turn (16 kHz), basal turn (32 kHz), and hook portion. Red, outer hair cells stained with phalloidin; green, absence of outer hair cells (A). In the apical turn (8 kHz) and the hook portion, the survival of OHCs in the dieckol+vehicle group (80.7 ± 23.4 cells/200 μm in the apical turn and 57.4 ± 29.9 cells/200 μm in the hook portion) was superior to that of the vehicle-only group (67.3 ± 20.7 cells/200 μm in the apical turn and 49.9 ± 23.4 μm in the hook portion), but this difference did not reach a statistical significance (B). ** p < 0.01. Scale bars represent 50 µm in (A). Error bars represent standard deviations.
Marinedrugs 20 00622 g003
Marinedrugs 20 00622 g004 550
Figure 4. Histology of the tympanic membrane (TM) and mucosa at the base of the bulla (BB). The TM and BB retain drug/vehicle for the longest time and therefore need to be assessed for scheme.
Figure 4. Histology of the tympanic membrane (TM) and mucosa at the base of the bulla (BB). The TM and BB retain drug/vehicle for the longest time and therefore need to be assessed for scheme.
Marinedrugs 20 00622 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, H.; Oh, S.H.; Shin, H.-C.; Suh, M.-W. Intratympanic Administration of Dieckol Prevents Ototoxic Hearing Loss. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20100622

AMA Style

Li H, Oh SH, Shin H-C, Suh M-W. Intratympanic Administration of Dieckol Prevents Ototoxic Hearing Loss. Marine Drugs. 2022; 20(10):622. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20100622

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Hui, Seung Ha Oh, Hyeon-Cheol Shin, and Myung-Whan Suh. 2022. "Intratympanic Administration of Dieckol Prevents Ototoxic Hearing Loss" Marine Drugs 20, no. 10: 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20100622

APA Style

Li, H., Oh, S. H., Shin, H. -C., & Suh, M. -W. (2022). Intratympanic Administration of Dieckol Prevents Ototoxic Hearing Loss. Marine Drugs, 20(10), 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/md20100622

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop