Next Article in Journal
Identification and Heterologous Expression of the Kendomycin B Biosynthetic Gene Cluster from Verrucosispora sp. SCSIO 07399
Next Article in Special Issue
Chemical Composition and In Vitro Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of the Marine Cyanolichen Lichina pygmaea Volatile Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical and Physical Culture Conditions Significantly Influence the Cell Mass and Docosahexaenoic Acid Content of Aurantiochytrium limacinum Strain PKU#SW8
Previous Article in Special Issue
Algae-Derived Anti-Inflammatory Compounds against Particulate Matters-Induced Respiratory Diseases: A Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gracilaria gracilis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) from Dakhla (Southern Moroccan Atlantic Coast) as Source of Agar: Content, Chemical Characteristics, and Gelling Properties

1
Phycology, Blue Biodiversity and Biotechnology RU, Laboratory of Plant Biotechnology, Ecology and Ecosystem Valorization—CNRST Labeled Research Unit N°10, Faculty of Sciences, University Chouaib Doukkali, P.O. Box 20, 24000 El Jadida, Morocco
2
Laboratory of Catalysis and Corrosion of Materials, Faculty of Sciences, University Chouaib Doukkali, P.O. Box 20, 24000 El Jadida, Morocco
3
Materials and Transformations Unit, University of Lille, CNRS, INRAE, Centrale Lille, UMR 8207-UMET, F-59000 Lille, France
4
CIIMAR, Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Av. General Norton de Matos, s/n, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal
5
Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2021, 19(12), 672; https://doi.org/10.3390/md19120672
Submission received: 12 November 2021 / Revised: 24 November 2021 / Accepted: 25 November 2021 / Published: 26 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Compounds Derived from Marine Macrophytes)

Abstract

:
Agar is a sulfated polysaccharide extracted from certain marine red algae, and its gel properties depend on the seaweed source and extraction conditions. In the present study, the seaweed Gracilaria gracilis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) from Dakhla (Moroccan Atlantic Coast) was investigated for its agar content, structure, and gel properties. The agar yields of G. gracilis were 20.5% and 15.6% from alkaline pretreatment and native extraction, respectively. Agar with alkaline pretreatment showed a better gelling property supported by higher gel strength (377 g·cm−2), gelling (35.4 °C), and melting (82.1 °C) temperatures with a notable increase in 3,6-anhydro-galactose (11.85%) and decrease in sulphate (0.32%) contents. The sulfate falling subsequent to alkaline pretreatment was verified through FT-IR spectroscopy. The 13C NMR spectroscopy showed that alkaline-pretreated agar has a typical unsubstituted agar pattern. However, native agar had a partially methylated agarose structure. Overall, this study suggested the possibility of the exploitation of G. gracilis to produce a fine-quality agar. Yet, further investigation may need to determine the seasonal variability of this biopolymer according to the life cycle of G. gracilis.

1. Introduction

Seaweed’s cell wall and other components in the cellular matrix are made up of mostly structural polysaccharides existing as a heteropolysaccharide complex. A large amount of these polymers is sulfated, which includes the agar (with two polysaccharides mixtures, namely agarose and agaropectin; Figure 1) extracted from marine red algae known as agarophytes [1]. Agar applications are mainly based on their gel characteristics. More than 80% of the agar produced is consumed by the food industry and the rest is utilized mainly in biotechnology and other scientific applications [2]. Gracilaria and Gelidium species are mainly used for commercially producing agar. Gracilaria is preferred for the production of food-grade agar, whereas Gelidium is used for the production of pharmaceutical-grade agar and agarose [3,4]. Moreover, agar from Gelidium is better quality with an interesting gel strength, gelling, and melting temperatures [5,6], while a low-quality agar gel is obtained from Gracilaria spp. related to its high sulfate content [7]. However, the gelling properties of agars from Gracilaria species can be enhanced by an alkali pretreatment to convert α-l-galactose-6-sulfate into 3,6-anhydro-α-l-galactose [8].
Over the years, due to the growing demand for agar, natural stocks of agarophytes have been overexploited leading to a deficiency of wild raw material for agar production [9]. In 2015, the global agar market was estimated to be USD 214.98 million, which is further anticipated to grow at 4.9% CAGR from 2016 to 2025 [10]. Accordingly, the culture of agar-producing seaweeds, especially Gracilaria spp., is initiated in several countries [11]. The quantity of farmed Gracilaria species rose from 933,000 tons in 2005 [12] to 3.6 million tons in 2019, contributed to by 11 countries, including six countries in Eastern and South-Eastern Asia, two countries in South America (Chile and Brasil), two countries in Northern Africa (Morocco and Tunisa), and one European country (Spain) [13]. In fact, the culture of Gracilaria could enhance its production in other regions to respond to agar market demand [14]. During the last decade, Morocco has adopted a new development and competitiveness strategy for the aquaculture sector. The Halieutis plan that identified the development of aquaculture as a growth driver of the fishery sector created the national agency for the development of aquaculture. One of the priority actions of this Agency was the identification of suitable areas for aquaculture development. Currently, suitable natural sites for Gracilaria farming are recognized to supplement the natural resources for agar production. In addition, the increasing demand for seaweed products and the need for fishermen to seek alternative or additional livelihoods resulted in the emergence of seaweed farms in some locations along the Moroccan coastlines such as Marchika lagoon and Dakhla bay [15], with 273 tons of Moroccan farmed Gracilaria actually supplied to the global seaweed market [13]. Gracilaria gracilis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) is among the agarophytes species proposed to be most farmed in Dakhla bay. Unfortunately, the data regarding the content and quality of the agar from this species are not available. In this context, the present work aims to investigate the physicochemical characterization of agar from G. gracilis collected on natural deposits at Dakhla (South of Morocco), which constitutes the main cutting source of G. gracilis farming projects.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Agar Content

The agar yields of G. gracilis are shown in Table 1. The native extraction had a yield of 15.16 ± 2.5% dw. Agar yield increased to 20.5 ± 1.3% dw when alkaline treatment (6% NaOH) was used prior to extraction. According to Yarnpakdee et al. [16], alkaline pretreatment can destabilize the cross-links occurring in the cell wall of Gracilaria species. This allowed the release of more agars from a swollen or disrupted structure during extraction. Fidelis et al. [17] reported that native extraction (using water only) of sulphated polysaccharides from Gracilaria birdae had a lower yield, compared to the combination method of an alkaline solution, proteolysis, and sonication. Similarly, Praiboon et al. [18] highlighted that the agars extracted from Gracilaria fisheri and G. edulis using alkaline pretreatment (5% NaOH) have a higher yield compared to native extraction. Nevertheless, alkaline pretreatment at temperatures exceeding 80 °C caused a decrease in the yield of agar due to the degradation of polysaccharides and agar loss associated with diffusion during the pretreatment process [19,20,21,22].

2.2. Structural Characterization

2.2.1. FT-IR Analysis

The FT-IR spectra of G. gracilis extracted agar showed significant similarity with the analyzed commercial agar (Figure 2). The typical bands of agar were, commonly, situated at 700–1400 cm−1 [23]. The band located at 738 cm−1 is attributed to C-O-C binding [24]. The band at 805 cm−1 recorded in native extracted agar (Figure 2c) is recognized as sulfate groups at C-2 of 3,6 anydro-l-galactose [23,24]. The weak band at 855 cm−1 is attributed to the sulfate groups at C-4 of D-galactose [25,26,27]. The band located at 886 cm−1 is linked to C-H bending at C-1 of β galactopyranosyl [26,28]. The band assigned to the C-O vibration of 3,6-anhydro-galactose was detected at 928 cm−1 [29,30]. The intense band detected at 1033 cm−1 and the one at 1148 cm−1 are usually ascribed to C-O and C-C stretching vibrations of the pyranose ring [26,27]. The bands identified at 1243 cm−1 and 1367 cm−1 are assigned to the stretching vibration of ester sulfate groups [27,29,31]. The spectrum of extracted agar with alkaline pretreatment (Figure 2b) depicted an attenuation of the band at 1243 cm−1. It was previously reported that unstable sulfate could be removed during alkaline pretreatment [16].

2.2.2. 13C-NMR Analysis

The 13C-NMR spectra of agar from Gracilaria gracilis (Figure 3a,b) are similar to that of commercial agar (Figure 3c), showing 12 signals characteristic of agarobiose. The signal detected at 102.6 ppm corresponds to C1 of β-d-galactopyranose, and those recorded at 70.4, 82.4, 68.9, 75.5, and 61.6 ppm are associated with C2, C3, C4, C5, and C6, respectively, of 3-linked β-d-galactopyranosyl units [32]. Furthermore, the signals for carbon atoms in 3,6-anhydro-α-l-galactopyranose were identified at 98.5, 80.3, 77.5, 75.8, 70.07, and 69.6 ppm related to C1, C3, C4, C5 C6, and C2, respectively [32,33,34]. The native extracted agar (Figure 3a) showed a weak signal at 59.2 ppm characteristic of O-methyl groups of agarobiose [32,35]. In contrast, signals linked to methoxy substituents were not noticeable in the spectrum of alkaline pretreated agar (Figure 3b). The minor signals detected in agar from G. gracilis at 72.0 and 73.8 ppm could be assigned to the residue of floridean starch [32,34].

2.3. Physical Properties of Agar Gels

2.3.1. Gel Strength

The gel strength of agar extracted from Gracilaria gracilis varied from 105 ± 6.08 g·cm−2 for the native agar to 377 ± 19.79 g·cm−2 when 6% NaOH solution was used for pretreatment (Table 2). The comparison of gel strength values of agars from G. gracilis, previously reported in the literature, resulted in extreme variability. The gel strength of agar from G. gracilis from Thau lagoon (France) reached a value of 630 ± 15 g·cm−2 [20]. However, the gel strength value of G. gracilis from the Sea of Japan (Russia) did not exceed 250g·cm−2 [22]. Rebello et al. [36] reported a value of 859 g·cm−2 of agar gel strength for G. gracilis from Namibia. Likewise, the agar gel strength of G. gracilis from a Sicilian lagoon (Italy) showed a very high value of 880 g·cm−2 [37], while G. gracilis from the Patagonic coast of Argentina had a gel strength of 437 g·cm−2 [38]. This variability in gel strength values could be attributed to the different locations and physiological factors. Additionally, harvesting season is a determining factor for agar quality [39].

2.3.2. Gelling and Melting Temperatures

Gelling and melting temperatures of the native extracted agar were 31.7 ± 0.2 °C and 78.5 ± 0.4 °C, respectively. As shown in Table 2, the alkaline-pretreated agar had high melting and gelling temperatures (82.1 ± 0.1 °C and 35.4 ± 0.3 °C, respectively). This result indicated that alkaline pretreatment contributed to improving the gelling and melting temperatures of agar from G. gracilis. The gelling (31.7–35.4 °C) and melting temperature (78.5–82.1 °C) ranges obtained for the G. gracilis agars are comparable to those reported by Rodríguez et al. [38] for the same species (31 °C and 85 °C, respectively). These values were lower than that reported for other Gracilaria species [18,21,40,41]. It has been reported that the gelling and melting temperatures were related to the harvested regions, extraction processes, and molecular weight distribution [16,21].

2.4. Chemical Properties

2.4.1. Sulfate Content

The extracted agars from G. gracilis showed low sulfate levels (Table 3). The native agar form of G. gracilis depicted relatively higher sulphate content (0.65 ± 0.03%) compared to that with alkaline pretreatment (0.32 ± 0.10%). Mollet et al. [24] reported that sulphate contents of G. gracilis from Roscoff (Brittany, France) were reduced to 2.1% after alkali treatments. The sulfate contents in G. salicornia were in the range of 0.3–0.8% of alkali-treated samples, but they exceeded 2% for native (non-treated) samples [42]. Moreover, the lowest sulfate content (1.8% ± 0.03%) of agar from G. lemaneiformis was detected for the alkaline treatment [43]. These results were attributed to the desulfation of alkaline treatment prior to agar extraction (Figure 4) that can eliminate the sulfate ester at C-6 of the l-galactose [44]. If the hydroxyl group on C-3 is free, the treatment of agar molecules with alkali solutions removes the energetically unstable axial sulphate ester at C-6 of the l-galactopyranose unit giving rise to more stable 3,6-anhydro-l-galactose [45]. This conversion led to the formation of a three-dimensional gel network, consequently improving the gelling properties [46].

2.4.2. 3,6-Anhydro-galactose Content

As shown in Table 3, the content of 3,6-anhydro-galactose in Gracilaria gracilis agar was increased (11.85 ± 0.42%) when the algal biomass was treated with a NaOH solution. This observation supports the conclusion that the conversion of l-galactose sulfate to 3,6-anhydro-galactose by the alkaline treatment gave rise to the gel strength enhancement (Table 2). Similar findings were previously reported for other Gracilaria species [20,21,41,47]. Significant 3,6-anhydrogalactose contents are frequently related to high gel strength [9]. During the alkali pretreatment, the sulphate axially associated with 1,4-l-galactose is de-esterified resulting in an increase in 3,6-anhydro-galactose and amplification of the hydrogen bonds between extra hydroxyl groups and the oxygen atom linking the third and sixth carbon atoms in 1,4-l-galactose. Hence, the microcrystalline structure of agar becomes more stable [48].

3. Materials and Methods

The study site is located along the Dakhala shoreline (Southern Atlantic coast of Morocco). This area consists of a sheltered coastal bay where the largest zones of intertidal habitat are located in the northern part of the bay and along the inner coast of the peninsula. Gracilaria gracilis thalli were harvested from the outer coast of the peninsula (23°51′29″ N 15°51′58″ W) including a mixture of rocky and sandy biotope, with irregular-sized beaches and rocky outcrops. The collected samples were washed with sea water to remove the attached shells, sand, and other algae. Subsequently, the samples were thoroughly washed with tap water, and then subjected to sunlight for 1 week. The sundried samples were further dried to a constant weight at 50 °C.
The agar extraction was performed according to the methodology from Rebello et al. [49] and Li et al. [50], albeit slightly modified. Each extraction was performed in triplicate to obtain the average and standard deviation. Native agar was extracted by 20 g of dried seaweed hydrated in 500 mL of distilled water and heated at 100 °C for 2 h. The mixture was filtered, and the filtrate was allowed to gel at room temperature, frozen overnight, and thawed. The thawed gel was dehydrated with ethanol and then oven-dried at 50 °C to a constant weight. For the alkaline pretreatment extraction, 20 g of dried seaweed was mixed with 500 mL of a 6% NaOH solution and heated at 70 °C for 3 h. The residue was rinsed and soaked in 500 mL of distilled water at pH 6.2 for 12 h. The rest of the extraction steps proceeded as described in the native extraction.
The samples of agar powder were analyzed by FT-IR in attenuated total reflectance (ATR) mode using a Thermo Scientific Nicolet Impact 400D FT-IR Spectrometer (Nicolet Instrument Co., Madison, WI, USA). The spectra were scanned at a 4 cm−1 resolution between 500 and 4000 cm−1, with an average of 32 scans. The spectra were processed by OMNIC software (Nicolet, Madison, WI, USA).
The 13C NMR analyses of agar samples were carried out at 353 K using the spectrometer AV II 400 MHz, 9.4T (Proton Larmor frequency of 400.33 MHz, Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), with a 5 mm Triple Resonance Broadband Inverse probe (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) at a base frequency of 100.62 MHz. Presaturation was applied during the relaxation delay and mixing time. The exponential multiplication apodization functions were applied in one dimension with 0.5 for line broadening prior to Fourier transformation.
The gel strength of the extracted agar (1.5% w/v) was investigated through determination of the load (g·cm−2), leading the cylindrical plunger (1 cm2 cross-section) to break the gel in 20 s [51]. Gelling and melting temperatures were measured according to the Freile-Pelegrın and Robledo [19] modified method. Agars (1.5% (w/v) were dissolved in distilled water at 90 °C. Then, 20 mL of agar solutions were poured in test tubes with glass beads (5 mm diameter). The tubes were regularly tilted until the bead stopped moving and the gel temperature was directly recorded. The melting temperature was tested using the same tubes by increasing the temperature from 50 to 100 °C at 0.5 °C/ min; as the bead dropped into the solution, the melting temperature was measured.
The sulphate content was measured by the BaCl2 turbidimetric slightly modified method of Craigie et al. [52]. Gelatin was dissolved in distillated water (0.3% w/v) at 60–70 °C and then allowed to cool. After 16 h at 4 °C, the temperature was brought to 20–25 °C and 2.0 g of BaCl2 was added to the gelatin solution. Then, 0.02 g of agar samples was hydrolyzed in 0.5 mL of HCl (2 N) for 2 h at 100 °C. The contents were then transferred and made to volume in a 10 mL volumetric flask. Humic substances were discarded by centrifugation. Furthermore, 1 mL of the supernatant, 9 mL of distilled water, and 1 mL of 0.5N HCl were mixed. Then, 0.5 mL of the BaCl2-gelatin reagent was added and agitated. After 30 min, the contents of the flask were again mixed, and the turbidity was measured at 550 nm against a reagent blank. The K2SO4 was used as a standard at the concentration range of 5–60 μg·S·mL−1.
The content of 3,6-anhydro-galactose was determined by the slightly modified resorcinol method [53,54]. The resorcinol reagent was prepared with 9 mL of a resorcinol solution (1.5 mg/mL), 1 mL of a 1,1-Diethoxyethane solution (0.04% v/v), and 100 mL of concentrated HCl. Subsequently, a 0.09 mL aliquot of the sample solution (1 mg/mL) was added to a glass tube followed by the addition of 0.6 mL of distilled water. After being placed in an ice bath for 5 min, 3 mL of the resorcinol reagent was added, mixed homogenously in an ice bath, and then kept at room temperature for 2 min. The mixture was incubated for 10 min at 80 °C followed by cooling for 5 min in an ice bath. The absorbance of 3,6-anhydro-galactose was measured at 555 nm. A standard curve was prepared using D-fructose at concentrations ranging from 1 to 40 μg·mL−1. The 3,6-anhydro-galactose content was calculated and expressed as the percentage (dry weight basis).

4. Conclusions

Agar extracted from the Rhodophyte Gracilaria gracilis, harvested from the Southern Moroccan Atlantic coast, was investigated via physical and chemical analysis. An agar yield of 20.5% ± 1.3% was obtained from alkali pretreated samples. The alkali pretreated agar demonstrated a better gelling property supported by higher gel strength (377 ± 19.79 g·cm−2), gelling (35.4 ± 0.3 °C), and melting (82.1 ± 0.1 °C) temperatures with a notable increase in 3,6-anhydro-galactose (11.85 ± 0.42%) and a decline in sulphate (0.32 ± 0.10%) contents. The agar from G. gracilis can ultimately be used in the agar industry once its physico-chemical properties have been enhanced by alkali treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: B.S., F.B. and V.V.; methodology: Z.B., S.B., A.N., K.K. and S.B., software, F.B. and C.J., validation: B.S., A.R. and C.J., formal analysis: Z.B. and S.B., investigation: F.B. and Z.B., data curation: B.S. and Z.B., writing—original draft preparation: Z.B., writing—review and editing: B.S., F.B., C.J. and V.V., supervision: B.S. and V.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the project VPMA3/DESRS-ANPMA-CNRST “Exploitation de la diversité spécifique et génétique pour une bioraffinerie innovante des algues marines de la côte atlantique marocaine”. V.V. acknowledges FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology within the scope of UIDB/04423/2020 and UIDP/04423/2020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are reported within this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; nor in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Padam, B.S.; Chye, F.Y. Seaweed components, properties, and applications. In Advances in Green and Sustainable Chemistry Sustainable Seaweed Technologies Cultivation, Biorefinery, and Applications; Dolores, M., Kraan, T.S., Dominguez, H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 33–87. [Google Scholar]
  2. Padmesh, S.; Singh, A. Agars: Properties and Applications. In Polysaccharides: Properties and Applications; Inamuddin, Imran Ahamed, M., Boddula, R., Altalhi, T., Eds.; Scrivener Publishing LLC: Beverly, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 75–94. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bixler, H.J.; Porse, H. A decade of change in the seaweed hydrocolloids industry. J. Appl. Phycol. 2011, 23, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chew, K.W.; Juan, J.C.; Phang, S.M.; Ling, T.C.; Show, P.L. An overview on the development of conventional and alternative extractive methods for the purification of agarose from seaweed. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2018, 53, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xiao, A.; Xiao, Q.; Weng, H.; Ni, H.; Hong, Q.; Lin, K. Physicochemical and gel properties of agar extracted by enzyme and enzyme-assisted methods. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 87, 530–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, Y.; Zhao, M.; Gomez, L.P.; Senthamaraikannan, R.; Padamati, R.B.; O’Donnell, C.P.; Tiwari, B.K. Investigation of enzyme-assisted methods combined with ultrasonication under a controlled alkali pretreatment for agar extraction from Gelidium sesquipedale. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 120, 106905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Şahin, O.I. Seaweed Polysaccharides: Structure, Extraction and Applications. In Polysaccharides: Properties and Applications; Inamuddin, Imran Ahamed, M., Boddula, R., Altalhi, T., Eds.; Scrivener Publishing LLC: Beverly, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 61–74. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cotas, J.; Leandro, A.; Pacheco, D.; Gonçalves, A.M.M.; Pereira, L. A Comprehensive Review of the Nutraceutical and Therapeutic Applications of Red Seaweeds (Rhodophyta)? Life 2020, 10, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Armisen, R. World-wide use and importance of Gracilaria. J. Appl. Phycol. 1995, 7, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chudasama, N.A.; Sequeira, R.A.; Moradiya, K.; Prasad, K. Seaweed Polysaccharide Based Products and Materials: An Assessment on Their Production from a Sustainability Point of View. Molecules 2021, 26, 2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Porse, H.; Rudolph, B. The seaweed hydrocolloid industry: 2016 updates, requirements and outlook. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 2187–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018—Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals; Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cai, J.; Lovatelli, A.; Aguilar-Manjarrez, J.; Cornish, L.; Dabbadie, L.; Desrochers, A.; Diffey, S.; Garrido Gamarro, E.; Geehan, J.; Hurtado, A.; et al. Seaweeds and Microalgae: An Overview for Unlocking Their Potential in Global Aquaculture Development; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2021; Volume 1229, pp. 2–10. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fethi, M.; Ghedifa, A.B. Optimum ranges of combined abiotic factor for Gracilaria gracilis aquaculture. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 3025–3040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kassila, J.; Nhhala, H.; Givernaud, T.; Monsouri, M.; Yazami, O.; Abrehouch, A.; Mosfioui, A.; Idahala, M. Opportunities for the development of seaweed farming as a supplementary income for small-scale fishermen in Nador lagoon: Experimental cultivations of Gracilaria gracilis (Stackhouse). MedFAR 2019, 2, 12–26. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yarnpakdee, S.; Benjakul, S.; Kingwascharapong, P. Physico-chemical and gel properties of agar from Gracilaria tenuistipitata from the lake of Songkhla, Thailand. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 51, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fidelis, G.P.; Camara, R.B.G.; Queiroz, M.F.; Costa, M.S.S.P.; Santos, P.C.; Rocha, H.A.O.; Costa, L.S. Proteolysis, NaOH and ultrasound-enhanced extraction of anticoagulant and antioxidant sulfated polysaccharides from the edible seaweed, Gracilaria birdiae. Molecules 2014, 19, 18511–18526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Praiboon, J.; Chirapart, A.; Akakabe, Y.; Bhumibhamon, O.; Kajiwara, T. Physical and chemical characterization of agar polysaccharides extracted from the Thai and Japanese species of Gracilaria. Sci. Asia 2006, 32, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Freile-Pelegrín, Y.; Robledo, D. Influence of alkali treatment on agar from Gracilaria cornea from Yucatan, Mexico. J. Appl. Phycol. 1997, 9, 533–539. [Google Scholar]
  20. Marinho-Soriano, E. Agar polysaccharides from Gracilaria species (Rhodophyta, Gracilariaceae). J. Biotechnol. 2001, 89, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Freile-Pelegrın, Y.; Murano, E. Agars from three species of Gracilaria (Rhodophyta) from Yucatan Peninsula. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Skriptsova, A.V.; Nabivailo, Y.V. Comparison of three gracilarioids: Growth rate, agar content and quality. J. Appl. Phycol. 2009, 21, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Melo, M.R.S.; Feitosa, J.P.A.; Freitas, A.L.P.; de Paula, R.C.M. Isolation and characterization of soluble sulfated polysaccharide from the red seaweed Gracilaria cornea. Carbohydr. Polym. 2002, 49, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mollet, J.C.; Rahaoui, A.; Lemoine, Y. Yield, chemical composition and gel strength of agarocolloids of Gracilaria gracilis, Gracilariopsis longissima and the newly reported Gracilaria cf. vermiculophylla from Roscoff (Brittany, France). J. Appl. Phycol. 1998, 10, 59–66. [Google Scholar]
  25. Prado-Fernandez, J.; Rodriguez-Vazquez, J.A.; Tojo, E.; Andrade, J.M. Quantitation of κ-, ι- and λ-carrageenans by mid-infrared spectroscopy and PLS regression. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 480, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gómez-Ordónez, E.; Rupérez, P. FTIR-ATR spectroscopy as a tool for polysaccharide identification in edible brown and red seaweeds. Food Hydrocoll. 2011, 25, 1514–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guerrero, P.; Etxabide, A.; Leceta, I.; Penalba, M.; de la Caba, K. Extraction of agar from Gelidium sesquipedale (Rodhopyta) and surface characterization of agar based films. Carbohyd. Polym. 2014, 99, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Martinez-Sanz, M.; Gomez-Mascaraque, L.G.; Ballester, A.R.; Martinez-Abad, A.; Brodkorb, A.; Lopez-Rubio, A. Production of unpurified agar-based extracts from red seaweed Gelidium sesquipedale by means of simplified extraction protocols. Algal Res. 2019, 38, 101420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sousa, A.M.M.; Morais, S.; Abreu, M.H.; Pereira, R.; Sousa-Pinto, I.; Cabrita, E.J.; Delerue-Matos, C.; Gonçalves, M.P. Structural, physical, and chemical modifications induced by microwave heating on native agar-like galactans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 4977–4985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Belattmania, Z.; Bentiss, F.; Jama, C.; Nadri, A.; Reani, A.; Sabour, B. Spectroscopic characterization and gel properties of agar from two Gelidium species from the Atlantic coast of Morocco. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2021, 11, 12642–12652. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chopin, T.; Kerin, B.; Mazerolle, R. Phycocolloid chemistry as a taxonomic indicator of phylogeny in the Gigartinales, Rhodophyceae: A review and current developments using Fourier transform infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Phycol. Res. 2006, 47, 167–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lahaye, M.; Rochas, C.; Yaphe, W. A new procedure for determining the heterogeneity of agar polymers in the cell walls of Gracilaria spp. (Gracilariaceae, Rhodophyta). Can. J. Bot. 1986, 64, 579–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lahaye, M.; Yaphe, W.; Viet, M.T.P.; Rochas, C. 13C-n.m.r. spectroscopic investigation of methylated and charged agarose oligosaccharides and polysaccharides. Carbohydr. Res. 1989, 190, 249–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Falshaw, R.; Furneaux, R.H.; Pickering, T.D.; Stevenson, D.E. Agars from Three Fijian Gracilaria Species. Bot. Mar. 1999, 42, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Murano, E.; Toffanin, R.; Zanetti, F.; Knutsen, S.H.; Paoletti, S.; Rizzo, R. Chemical and macromolecular characterisation of agar polymers from Gracilaria dura (C.Agardh) J. Agardh (Gracilariaceae, Rhodophyta). Carbohydr. Polym. 1992, 18, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rebello, J.; Ohno, M.; Critchley, A.T.; Sawamura, M. Growth rates and agar quality of Gracilaria gracilis (Stackhouse) steentoft from Namibia, Southern Africa. Bot. Mar. 1996, 39, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Capillo, G.; Genovese, G.; Monteleone, A.; Morabito, M.; Sanfilippo, M.; Manganaro, A. From culture to application. Agar from Gracilaria gracilis of Ganzirri Lagoon (Sicily, Italy). J. Biol. Res. 2014, 87, 5–6. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rodriguez, M.C.; Matulewicz, M.C.; Noseda, M.D.; Ducatti, D.R.B.; Leonardi, P.I. Agar from Gracilaria gracilis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) of the Patagonic coast of Argentina—Content, structure and physical properties. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 1435–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Capillo, G.; Sanfilippo, M.; Aliko, V.; Spanò, N.; Spinelli, A.; Manganaro, A. Gracilaria gracilis, Source of Agar: A Short Review. Curr. Org. Chem. 2017, 21, 380–386. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sousa, A.M.; Alves, V.D.; Morais, S.; Delerue-Matos, C.; Gonçalves, M.D. Agar extraction from integrated multitrophic aquacultured Gracilaria vermiculophylla: Evaluation of a microwave-assisted process using response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 3258–3267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Wang, L.; Shen, Z.; Mu, H.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, X. Impact of alkali pretreatment on yield, physico-chemical and gelling properties of high quality agar from Gracilaria tenuistipitata. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 70, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vuai, S.A.H.; Mpatani, F. Optimization of agar extraction from local seaweed species, Gracilaria salicornia in Tanzania. Phycol. Res. 2019, 67, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, H.; Xiao, Q.; Weng, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Q.; Xiao, A. Extraction of sulfated agar from Gracilaria lemaneiformis using hydrogen peroxide-assisted enzymatic method. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 232, 115790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sasuga, K.; Yamanashi, T.; Nakayama, S.; Ono, S.; Mikami, K. Optimization of yield and quality of agar polysaccharide isolated from the marine red macroalga Pyropia yezoensis. Algal Res. 2017, 26, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Armisen, R.; Galatas, F.; Phillips, G.; Williams, P. Agar. In Handbook of Hydrocolloids, 2nd ed.; Phillip, G., William, P., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2009; pp. 82–107. [Google Scholar]
  46. Murano, E. Chemical structure and quality of agars from Gracilaria. J. Appl. Phycol. 1995, 7, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Orduna-Rojas, J.; García-Camacho, K.Y.; Orozco-Meyer, P.; Ríosmena-Rodríguez, R.; Pacheco-Ruiz, I.; Zertuche-Gonzalez, J.A.; Meling-López, A.E. Agar properties of two species of Gracilariaceae from the Gulf of California, Mexico. J. Appl. Phycol. 2008, 20, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nishinari, K.; Watase, M. Effect of alkali pretreatment on the Rheologicai properties of concentrated agar-agar gels. Carbohydr. Polym. 1983, 3, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rebellol, J.; Ohno, M.; Ukeda, H.; Sawamural, M. Agar quality of commercial agarophytes from different geographical origins: 1. Physical and theological properties. J. Appl. Phycol. 1996, 8, 517–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, H.; Yu, X.; Jin, Y.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Y. Development of an eco-friendly agar extraction technique from the red seaweed Gracilaria lemaneiformis. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 3301–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Armisen, R.; Galatas, F. Production, properties and uses of agar. Production and utilization of products from commercial seaweeds. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 1987, 288, 1–57. [Google Scholar]
  52. Craigie, J.S.; Wen, Z.C.; Van der Meer, J.P. Interspecific, Intraspecific and Nutritionally-Determined Variations in the Composition of, Agars from Gracilaria spp. Bot. Mar. 1984, 27, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yaphe, W.; Arsenault, G.P. Improved resorcinol reagent for the determination of fructose, and of 3,6-anhydrogalactose in polysaccharides. Anal. Biochem. 1965, 13, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xie, X.T.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.Q.; Cheong, K.L. Quantification of 3,6-anhydro-galactose in red seaweed polysaccharides and their potential skin-whitening activity. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of repeating saccharide units of agar.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of repeating saccharide units of agar.
Marinedrugs 19 00672 g001
Figure 2. FT-IR spectra of commercial agar (a) compared to alkaline pretreated (b) and native (c) agars from Gracilara gracilis.
Figure 2. FT-IR spectra of commercial agar (a) compared to alkaline pretreated (b) and native (c) agars from Gracilara gracilis.
Marinedrugs 19 00672 g002
Figure 3. 13C-NMR spectra of native (a) and alkaline pretreated agar (b) extracted from Gracilaria gracilis compared to commercial agar (c).
Figure 3. 13C-NMR spectra of native (a) and alkaline pretreated agar (b) extracted from Gracilaria gracilis compared to commercial agar (c).
Marinedrugs 19 00672 g003
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of agar desulfation during alkaline treatment.
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of agar desulfation during alkaline treatment.
Marinedrugs 19 00672 g004
Table 1. Agar yields of Gracilaria gracilis.
Table 1. Agar yields of Gracilaria gracilis.
ExtractionYield (% dw)
Native Extraction15.16 ± 2.5
Alkaline Pretreatment20.50 ± 1.3
Table 2. Gel proprieties of agar from Gracilaria gracilis.
Table 2. Gel proprieties of agar from Gracilaria gracilis.
ExtractionGel Strength (g·cm−2)Melting
Temperature (°C)
Gelling
Temperature (°C)
Native Extraction105.30 ± 6.0878.5 ± 0.431.7 ± 0.2
Alkaline Pretreatment377.39 ± 19.7982.1 ± 0.135.4 ± 0.3
Table 3. Sulphate and 3,6-anhydro-galactose contents of agar from Gracilaria gracilis.
Table 3. Sulphate and 3,6-anhydro-galactose contents of agar from Gracilaria gracilis.
ExtractionSulfate (% dw)3,6-AG (% dw)
Native Extraction0.65 ± 0.035.67 ± 0.49
Alkaline Pretreatment0.32 ± 0.1011.85 ± 0.42
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Belattmania, Z.; Bhaby, S.; Nadri, A.; Khaya, K.; Bentiss, F.; Jama, C.; Reani, A.; Vasconcelos, V.; Sabour, B. Gracilaria gracilis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) from Dakhla (Southern Moroccan Atlantic Coast) as Source of Agar: Content, Chemical Characteristics, and Gelling Properties. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19120672

AMA Style

Belattmania Z, Bhaby S, Nadri A, Khaya K, Bentiss F, Jama C, Reani A, Vasconcelos V, Sabour B. Gracilaria gracilis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) from Dakhla (Southern Moroccan Atlantic Coast) as Source of Agar: Content, Chemical Characteristics, and Gelling Properties. Marine Drugs. 2021; 19(12):672. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19120672

Chicago/Turabian Style

Belattmania, Zahira, Sanaa Bhaby, Amal Nadri, Khaoulaa Khaya, Fouad Bentiss, Charafeddine Jama, Abdeltif Reani, Vitor Vasconcelos, and Brahim Sabour. 2021. "Gracilaria gracilis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) from Dakhla (Southern Moroccan Atlantic Coast) as Source of Agar: Content, Chemical Characteristics, and Gelling Properties" Marine Drugs 19, no. 12: 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19120672

APA Style

Belattmania, Z., Bhaby, S., Nadri, A., Khaya, K., Bentiss, F., Jama, C., Reani, A., Vasconcelos, V., & Sabour, B. (2021). Gracilaria gracilis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) from Dakhla (Southern Moroccan Atlantic Coast) as Source of Agar: Content, Chemical Characteristics, and Gelling Properties. Marine Drugs, 19(12), 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19120672

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop