Next Article in Journal
Scalarane-Type Sesterterpenoids from the Marine Sponge Lendenfeldia sp. Alleviate Inflammation in Human Neutrophils
Next Article in Special Issue
Lipid Indexes and Quality Evaluation of Omega-3 Rich Oil from the Waste of Japanese Spanish Mackerel Extracted by Supercritical CO2
Previous Article in Journal
Exogenous Antioxidants Improve the Accumulation of Saturated and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Schizochytrium sp. PKU#Mn4
Previous Article in Special Issue
Production and Physicochemical Characterization of Gelatin and Collagen Hydrolysates from Turbot Skin Waste Generated by Aquaculture Activities
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 19
Issue 10
10.3390/md19100560
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antioxidant Bioactivity of Extracts from Beach Cast Leaves of Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile

by
Concetta Maria Messina
1,*,
Rosaria Arena
1,
Simona Manuguerra
1,
Yann Pericot
2,
Eleonora Curcuraci
1,
Fanny Kerninon
2,
Giuseppe Renda
3,
Claire Hellio
2 and
Andrea Santulli
1,3
1
Laboratorio di Biochimica Marina ed Ecotossicologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Terra e del Mare DiSTeM, Università Degli Studi di Palermo, Via G. Barlotta 4, 91100 Trapani, Italy
2
LEMAR, IRD, CNRS, Ifremer, Université de Brest, F-29280 Plouzane, France
3
Istituto di Biologia Marina, Consorzio Universitario della Provincia di Trapani, Via G. Barlotta 4, 91100 Trapani, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2021, 19(10), 560; https://doi.org/10.3390/md19100560
Submission received: 19 July 2021 / Revised: 26 September 2021 / Accepted: 27 September 2021 / Published: 30 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fishery Discards, Processing Waste and Marine By-Products Valorization in the Era of Zero Waste: From Discovery to Profit 2.0)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The marine environment is a generous source of biologically active compounds useful for human health. In 50 years, about 25,000 bioactive marine compounds have been identified, with an increase of 5% per year. Peculiar feature of algae and plants is the production of secondary metabolites, such as polyphenols, synthesized as a form of adaptation to environmental stress. Posidonia oceanica is a Mediterranean endemic and dominant seagrass and represents a biologically, ecologically and geologically important marine ecosystem. Within this study, methanolic and ethanolic extracts were generated from fresh and dried Posidonia oceanica leaves, with the aim to employ and valorize the beach cast leaves. The best yield and antioxidant activity (polyphenols content equal to 19.712 ± 0.496 mg GAE/g and DPPH IC50 of 0.090 µg/µL.) were recorded in 70% ethanol extracts (Gd-E4) obtained from leaves dried for two days at 60 °C and ground four times. HPLC analyses revealed the presence of polyphenols compounds (the most abundant of which was chicoric acid) with antioxidant and beneficial properties. Bioactive properties of the Gd-E4 extracts were evaluated in vitro using fibroblast cells line (HS-68), subjected to UV induced oxidative stress. Pre-treatment of cells with Gd-E4 extracts led to significant protection against oxidative stress and mortality associated with UV exposure, thus highlighting the beneficial properties of antioxidants compounds produced by these marine plants against photo damage, free radicals and associated negative cellular effects. Beach cast leaves selection, processing and extraction procedures, and the in vitro assay results suggested the potentiality of a sustainable approach for the biotechnological exploitation of this resource and could serve a model for other marine resources.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The marine environment is characterized by a high biodiversity. Many marine organisms have developed chemical defences to adapt to the environment, producing a wide range of biologically important compounds, that can be exploited for biomedicine, food, nutraceutical and cosmeceutical purposes [1,2]. Research in the last few years has focused on algae and plants with exceptional properties [2,3,4,5,6,7]. With an estimated coverage area of over 300,000 km2 [8], seagrasses beds are one of the most widespread marine habitats on the planet. Despite their abundance and the fact that they offer incredible opportunities for discovering new phytochemicals, research applied to seagrasses compared to algae remains underdeveloped [9]. In particular, seagrasses have excellent human health properties, including antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities [1,10,11,12,13]. Posidonia oceanica (Linnaeus) Delile (Phylum magnoliophyta; Class liliopsida; Order alismatale) is a seagrass endemic to the Mediterranean Sea, with an important ecological role [14]. It is protected through the EU European ‘Habitats’ Directive 92/43/EEC [15], the Bern (1976) and Barcelona Convention (1976, amended in 1995) [14,16].
In autumn P. oceanica loses leaves are deposited along the coast by storm surges and subsequently form dead leaf structures called “banquettes”, that exert a major role in coastal biodiversity end shore protection from erosion [14]. Since prehistoric times, dead leaves of P. oceanica have been used throughout the Mediterranean as thermal insulation, compost, etc., until the species was declared protected, leading many countries to ban its use [7,14]. In Italy, the legislation concerning the management of beached P. oceanica is still lacking and the matter is regulated either as a waste or as a resource [17], allowing the use of P. oceanica beach cast leaves as compost up to a maximum of 20% their weight in the banquettes [17,18,19].
In recent years, a growing number of studies have increased the knowledge of the beneficial properties of phytocomplex extracted from P. oceanica for human health, such as antidiabetic, antioxidant and vasoprotective effects [1,3,20]. Different natural products have been isolated from leaves, such as antioxidant molecules (e.g., natural phenols, phenylmethane derivatives, phenyl ethane derivatives, phenylpropane derivatives and their esters, chalkones, flavonols) [7,21,22].
The high importance of antioxidants in the prevention of the diseases, determined by oxidative stress, has drawn the attention to the natural molecules extracted from marine plants, algae and bacteria able to counteract oxidative stress caused by exogenous and endogenous factors [1,2,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Furthermore, the interest in identification of cosmeceutical compounds extracted by marine plants and algae is increasing [2,3,4,5,6,7].
P. oceanica leaves have a high content of secondary metabolites, mainly represented by phenolic compounds making this seagrass a potential useful source of antioxidant molecules, to counter oxidative stress, which leads wrinkle formation, skin aging, cancer and cardiovascular diseases [1,7,30,31,32,33]. Excessive and prolonged exposure to ultra-violet radiation (UV) is one of the main factor for the cellular over-production of radical species, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) [34,35]. Under normal physiological conditions, cellular systems are able to maintain a balance between the production of reactive oxygen species and the cellular ability to detoxify the reactive intermediates [7].
Considering the bioactive properties of P. oceanica leaves extracts and its ability to counteract oxidative stress, the aims of this work were the quantification of the polyphenolic content and antioxidant capacity of extracts obtained from leaves of P. oceanica and the assessment of the efficiency of different solvents for polyphenol extraction. We investigated also whether the different leaf colors, indicative of the reduction of photosynthetic capacity during aging, could be linked to antioxidant capacity, correlated with a different quantity and quality of specific compounds.
In order to consider biotechnology applications, we checked whether the antioxidant power of the extract was transferred to the cellular level, by testing the bioactive properties in vitro, in terms of antioxidants and photo-protective, for application in cosmeceutical. Furthermore, we proposed a sustainable protocol for the collection and use of P. oceanica beach cast leaves before they die and became litter and accumulating in banquettes.

2. Results

2.1. Characterization of the Antioxidant Power

2.1.1. Total Phenolic Content

Figure 1 showed the phenolic yield of the various extracts obtained from P. oceanica leaves.
The total phenolic contents of extracts obtained from fresh leaves by 70% ethanol classified as green (G), half-green (H) and brown (B), showed similar values. Among extracts obtained from green leaves, the higher content (p < 0.05) in total phenolic compounds (19.712 ± 0.496 mg GAE/g) was measured in those obtained from green leaves dried at 60 °C for 48 h, ground four times and extracted with 70% ethanol (Gd-E4).

2.1.2. HPLC Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

Table 1 showed phenolic compound concentrations (µg/g) of extracts from P. oceanica leaves.
Extracts obtained from green leaves (G) showed the highest total concentration of phenolic compounds compared to H and B extracts (Table 1).
Extracts obtained from dried leaves (Table 1) had higher concentration (µg/g) of phenolic compounds, compared to extracts from fresh leaves.
Solvents utilized for the extraction induced significant differences in extraction yields (Table 1). With 80% methanol extraction, both extracts obtained from dried green leaves ground once ((Gd-M1) and four times (Gd-M4), ρ-hydroxybenzoic acid is not present, while in the ethanol extracts (Gd-E1) it is present at low concentration (2.714 µg/g) and high concentration in Gd-E4 (519.272 µg/g). Chicoric acid was the most abundant phenolic compound in all extracts (Table 1).
Significant differences were recorded between the two different drying procedures (Gd37-E and Gd-E4) (Table 1). In particular, it was observed that Gd37-E contained 110.807 µg/g DW of ρ-hydroxybenzoic and 2843.772 µg/g DW of chicoric acid, whereas Gd-E4 extracts contained 519.272 µg/g DW and 4991.813 µg/g DW of ρ-hydroxybenzoic and of chicoric acid, respectively (Table 1).

2.1.3. Antioxidant Power—DPPH Assay

Results of the DPPH radical scavenging activity, quantifying antioxidant activity of Posidonia leaf extracts, are displayed in Figure 2.
The lowest IC50 value (0.090 µg/µL), indicating the highest free radical scavenging ability, was observed in Gd-E4, comparable to the antioxidant power of the synthetic standards we utilized (Figure 2). On the contrary, as expected, the highest IC50 (14.530 µg/µL) was observed in brown leaf extract (B), not photosynthetically active leaves.

2.2. In Vitro Photo Protective Effect Evaluation of Posidonia Oceanica Extracts

On the basis of the preliminary evaluation of the antioxidant activity (Table 1), Gd-E4 extracts were selected to determine the photo protective capacity in vitro. Results showing responses of fibroblast not exposed to UV (-UV) to an increasing concentrations of Gd-E4, expressed as a percentage of viable cells compared to not extract treated cells (Control), are reported in Figure 3. Concentrations of Gd-E4 between 0.75–1.5 µg/mL did not induce any significant variation on the viability after 24 h, compared to control not exposed to UV (-UV) (Figure 3).
Obtained MTT test results (Figure 3) indicate that UV exposure of fibroblast not treated with extracts (Control +UV) and fibroblasts treated with ethanol, the solvent used to vehicular the extract to the cultured cells (EtOH +UV), induced a significate toxicity (p < 0.05), expressed by decrease of viability. On the contrary, pre-treating cells with different concentrations of Gd-E4 prior to exposure to UV light resulted in a photo protective effect, as demonstrated by an increase in cell viability, comparable to cells pretreated with synthetic antioxidant NAC (Figure 3).

3. Discussion

The marine environment constitutes a generous source of biologically active compounds useful for human health and for this reason, attracting a growing scientific research attention. In the last 50 years, about 25,000 marine bioactive compounds have been identified, with an increase of 5%/year [36]. Seaweeds and seagrasses represent a potential source of unique molecules, characterized by strong biological activities; they are therefore of major importance to humans [2,3,4,5,6,7]. A peculiar characteristic of algae and marine plants is the production of secondary metabolites, synthesized by metabolic pathways that do not participate in primary functions, but are used for their adaptation to environmental stress conditions and as defense against pathogens and predators [3]. In particular, the polyphenol production, as defence strategy involving at least 23 bioactive compounds, has been reported in P. oceanica [1,3,20,22,37]. Antioxidant and pharmacological properties identified in seagrasses are mostly linked to the presence of phenolic compounds, in particular phenolic acids and flavonoids [9]. These compound can be reducing agents, donors of electrons or hydrogen atoms [38] and heavy metals binder [39].
In this study, the polyphenolic content and the antioxidant capacity were determined in extracts obtained from P. oceanica leaves, with different physiological stage, identified by leaves color (green, half-green and brown) (Figure 1). In fact, HPLC analysis (Table 1) revealed that the profile of some specific phenolic compounds showed significant differences according to the colors of the leaves. Extracts obtained from green leaves (G), rich in chlorophyll and photosynthetically active, contained more bioactive phenolic compounds than extracts obtained from half brown (H) and brown (B) leaves. We considered then green leaves more suitable for our experimentation.
The effects of the grinding process before extraction was investigated. In fact, it has been described that smaller leaf particle size guarantee a better access of the extraction solvent and then a better yield [40].
In our study, extraction by different solvents of leaves ground once (coarse particles) or ground four times (fine particles) were compared. The extraction yield and antioxidant activity strongly depended on the polarity of the solvent, which influences both qualitatively and quantitatively the extracts [23,41]. The impact of the solvent used for extraction is well-documented, being mixture of methanol, ethanol or acetone with water the best solvents [42,43,44].
Ethanol extracts of fine particles of dried Posidonia leaves had a higher yield of total phenolic compounds (Table 1), dominated by chicoric acid, as already described by Grignon-Dubois and Rezzonico [45]. Gd-E4, besides having a higher polyphenolic content (19.712 ± 0.496 mg GAE/g), showed a higher antioxidant activity (Figure 2); in fact, Gd-E4 was the extract that has the lowest IC50 (0.090 µg/µL), comparable to that of synthetic antioxidants.
Drying by heat of the vegetal sample before extraction is a very complex stage. Some studies suggested that oven drying of the sample reduces drastically the yield and the bioactivity of the extracts [46,47,48]. High temperatures and oxygen expositions tend to damage the compounds of interest. However, on the other hand, some studies showed that the drying increased yields and bioactivities [44], or at least does not have any effect [49].
Drying temperature and time are factors that can influence the efficiency of the heat treatment. Phenolic compounds are thermo-sensitive so a high drying temperature can damage them [50]. But on the other hand, a long drying time means a long exposition to oxygen, which can also degrades polyphenols [50]. Leaves can be dried for a long time at low temperature or over a short time at a high temperature. To decide which one of these procedures was the most appropriate, we compared Posidonia leaf extracts dried over 5 days at 37 °C with extracts obtained from of leaves dried over 2 days at 60 °C. On the basis of obtained results, the best yield and bioactivity were obtained by extracts from leaves dried over 2 days at 60 °C. According to a Mrkìc et al. [51], the critical factor is indeed the drying time. A heat treatment over a short time at a high temperature seemed to be the best to recover phenolic compounds. Cannac et al. [49] also showed that water evaporated from leaves P. oceanica leaves very quickly because they were easily desiccated, because of their perpetual immersion. Thus, based on our results, for P. oceanica, we recommend rapid drying to preserve the compounds and maximize their recovery.
Cosmeceutics represent a promising area for valorization and use of marine bioactive molecules. Nowadays, plant-based cosmetics are expanding their popularity because of the significant impact these substances have on the prevention of skin aging [52]. Various molecules isolated from marine organisms have proven to be efficient against photo-induced oxidative damage to the skin [53].
Since secondary metabolites contribute to plant photoprotection [54], they are interesting candidates for the prevention of adverse effects caused by UV radiation on human skin cells [55]. In addition, they display important anti-aging potency, for example resveratrol has action on longevity factors [56,57]. A very interesting aspect is the antitumor effect provided by the ability of the extract of P. oceanica to reduce the expression and activity of gelatinase on human fibrosarcoma cells and human melanoma cell line, preventing cell invasion [20,58].
The Gd-E4 extract was selected to assess the protective extracts in vitro effect of P. oceanica, as it had both the highest polyphenolic content (Figure 1) and the highest antioxidant activity (Figure 2).
Results showed no significant adverse effects on viability of Posidonia leaf extracts (Figure 3).
Subsequently, the possible protective effect of Gd-E4 extract was investigated following exposure to UV, a known source of oxidative stress [59,60].
Analysis conducted through the MTT assay, showed that exposure to UV is able to induce a significant change in terms of density and cellular morphology, in cells exposed to UV without any pre-treatment with antioxidants compared to those previously treated with the extract Gd-E4 (Figure 3).
The exposure of cells to UV led to a significant increase in ROS and that, in contrast, exposure of cells to the same conditions, but with a pre-treatment (Gd-E4), showed improvement of cells viability.
Since it appears to be well documented the positive relationship between polyphenol content of plants extracts and their antioxidant activity in vitro [11,23,25,61,62,63,64], the high content of total phenolic compounds found in Gd-E4 extract, may explain its activity against oxidative stress.
Ultra-violet radiation (UVA and UVB) exposition, due to their capacity to generate free radicals, especially reactive oxygen species, in the cells and the establishment of a condition of oxidative stress, can lead to skin cancer and other photoaging complications [53,65]. The cytotoxic effect of UV responsible for damage to all biological macromolecules and cell viability, has been widely demonstrated [59,66]. Ultra-violet radiation has the ability to induce the apoptotic cascade event in animal cells [66] and human cells [36,67].
Numerous UV-absorbing compounds have been extracted and isolated from plants [67,68] and various marine organisms (algae, fungi, lichens, bacteria, phytoplankton, animals, and plants) for the development of anti-photoaging and photo protective natural products [53]. Phenolic compound extracted from Posidonia leaves could be considered as valuable candidates for the formulation of cosmetic products utilized for UV protection.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Samples Collection, Processing and Preparation of Plant Extract

Posidonia oceanica is a protected species by the European ’Habitats’ Directive 92/43/EEC [15], Barcelona Convention (1976, amended in 1995) and Annex 1 of the 1979 Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats-RS 0.455. Referring to the Italian legislation concerning the management of P. oceanica banquettes [17,18,19], fresh foliar bundles naturally detached from the meadow (e.g. due to sea storms) and not yet deposited along the coast, were collected in late winter and early spring (between February and March), before forming banks along the coast of Favignana, one of the islands of the Egadi Marine Protected Area.
A total of 10 kg of fresh detached foliar fascicles, not yet deposited along the coast to form banquettes, were collected monthly, which represent a negligible part of the annual casted leaves, considering that previous studies [69,70] reported the annual beaching of 3251 metric tons DW of P. oceanica along 18.2 km of coast in Sardinia and 72.2 metric tons DW along the Maltese coast in beaches extended between 0.35 and 112.8 km.
The sustainability of the collection method of P. oceanica foliar bundles, for the extraction of bioactive molecules, was validated by the Managing Authority of the Egadi Islands Marine Protected Area.
This method guaranteed the preservation of both the P. oceanica meadow, which remained untouched maintaining its important ecological role and of the banquettes that have an important role in the shore morph-dynamics and coastal stability [71], as the collecting took place before its formation.
Before each handling, the P. oceanica foliar bundles were selected and the basal sheath (or petiole) was removed and discarded to facilitate drying and extraction.
The leaves of P. oceanica were processed as shown in Figure 4.
The leaves of P. oceanica were extracted fresh and dried. Two procedures were carried out to dry the green leaves: in the first procedure the leaves were dried for 48 h at 60 °C, ground into fine powder [23], carrying out for part of the leaves one grinding cycle and the remaining part four grinding cycles; in the second procedure the leaves were dried for 5 days at 37 °C ground into fine powder with four grinding cycles.

Extraction

The leaves of collected bundles were divided into three batches, according to their photosynthetic capacity, determined by different colors: green leaves (G), half-green leaves, (H) and brown leaves (B), being the brown senescent leaves photosynthetically inactive. Five g of fresh green (G), half-green, (H) and brown leaves (B) were extracted by 10 mL of 70% ethanol homogenizing leaves for five minutes at 4 °C, using an Ultra-Turrax (IKA, Werke Staufen, Germany) at 24,000 rpm [72,73,74]. Green leaves were dried at 37 °C and 60 °C and submitted to one cycle or 4 cycle of grinding, lasting 10 min, by Grindomix GM200. One g of ground dried leaves was extracted by 10 mL of methanol 80% or ethanol 70%, Gd-M1 and Gd-E1, one grinding cycle and Gd-M4 and Gd-E4 four grinding cycles. Green leaves dried at 37 °C underwent 4 grinding cycles and were extracted with ethanol at 70% (Gd37-E).
The extracts were centrifuged (1100× g at 4 °C for 10 min) and the supernatant was recovered in a tube and stored at −20 °C.
The residue was solubilized and the extraction was performed with 10 mL of solvent as above. The recovered solvent was pooled with the previous extract. In the last extraction cycle the residue was again put back into solution with 10 mL of solvent and left to shake overnight at room temperature. The extract was centrifuged (1100× g at 4 °C for 10 min) and the supernatant was recovered and combined with the previous extract.
The contents of the extractions were transferred into a tube of known weight.
The extract was vacuum dried, weighed and finally re-suspended with a known volume of solvent to obtain a final concentration of 100 mg/mL or 50 mg/mL.

4.2. Characterization of the Antioxidant Power

4.2.1. Total Polyphenols Contents

Total phenolic content of samples was determined by Folin-Ciocalteu reagent assay [75,76].
Gallic acid (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was used as standard for calibration (5–500 mg/mL) and results were expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per g of the P. oceanica dw [23,25,26,77]. The absorbance of each dilution was measured at 725 nm, using a microplate reader (Multiskan-Sky Microplate Reader, Thermo-ScientificTM, Waltham, MA, USA). Each sample was analyzed in triplicate.

4.2.2. HPLC Analysis of Posidonia Leaf Extracts

A known concentration of Posidonia leaf extract (10 mg/mL) was filtered on 0.2 µm filter (MiniUniprep™, Whatman, Maidstone, England) prior to injection and analyzed by RP-HPLC, utilizing an Elite LaChrom HPLC system equipped with HPLC pump L-7100 (LaChrom, Merck-Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), Column oven L-7350 (LaChrom, Merck-Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and DAD detector L-2455 (Elite LaChrom, Merck-Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Data analysis was performed by EZChrom Elite V.3.1.7 software (Scientific Software, Pleasanton, CA, USA).
A column Kinetex C-18 (150 × 4.6 mm) ID 5 µm, 100 Å of shell size (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) was used at a constant temperature of 35 °C. The chromatographic separation of the extracts was obtained according to Puigventós et al. [78] with minor modifications. The binary gradient system was set with phase A (0.1% aqueous H3PO4, Merck, HPLC grade) and B (methanol, Chromanorm, VWR chemicals, HPLC grade), at a flow of 1.5 mL min−1, as follows: 0–3 min 5% B; 3–6 min from 5 to 25% B; 6–9 min from 25 to 37% B; 9–13 min 37% B; 13–18 min from 37 to 54% B; 18–22 min 54% B; 22–26 min from 54 to 95% B; 26–29 min 95% B; 29–29.15 min from 95 to 5% B; 29.15–36 min 5% B. Injection volume was 20 µL. Selected wavelengths for polyphenol analysis were 205, 280, 320 and 350 nm. HPLC grade (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) Caffeic Acid, ρ-coumaric Acid, Gallic Acid, ρ-hydroxybenzoic Acid, Phloroglucinol, Quercetin, Trans-ferulic Acid and Vanillic Acid, were used as standards for identification and quantification of polyphenols in Posidonia leaf extracts according to Robbins and Bean [79]. Calibration curves were obtained using a broad range of standard concentration (0.0125 to 0.5 mg/mL) in methanol solution.

4.2.3. DPPH Assay

DPPH Assay was performed reported by Brand-Williams et al. [80].
Samples were diluted in EtOH 96% at 10, 5 and 1 mg/mL and 20 µL of each dilution were added, in triplicate, to a 96 well plate. Standard curves were prepared for gallic acid, caffeic acid, ascorbic acid, alpha-tocopherol (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), using six concentrations (10; 5; 1; 0.5; 0.1 and 0.05 mg/mL). A total of 200 µL of 60 mg/mL DPPH (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) were added to each well (except the blank). Absorbance was read after 30 min. The percentage of DPPH inhibition was obtained by the following equation
I% = 1 − (Asample/Ablank) × 100%
The inhibition values were calculated for extracts at concentrations 1, 5 and 10 mg/mL and the slope of the linear portion of each graph was used to calculate IC 50% [23,81].

4.3. Evaluation of Bioactive Properties In Vitro

4.3.1. Cell Culture

Human skin fibroblast (HS-68) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were grown as a monolayer in flasks, using Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM glutamine, and 100 µg/mL penicillin–streptomycin, incubated in a humidified atmosphere at 5% CO2, 95% air and 37 °C, under sterile conditions.

4.3.2. Evaluation of Photo-Protective Effect in Fibroblast Cell Line HS-68

Cells at 80% of confluence were detached, utilizing a trypsin solution (0.05% of trypsin in PBS, pH 7.2–7.4) and pelleted by centrifugation (1000 rpm, 10 min, 25 °C). The cell suspension was dispensed in 96-well plate at a density of 8000 cells/well and incubated for 24 h before the exposure to ethanol extract of P. oceanica leaves (Gd-E4).
The extracts (dissolved in ethanol) were diluted in culture medium at a concentration ranging from 0.15–1.5 µg/mL, at a final solvent concentration not exceeding 0.1% (v/v). As already assessed [25] this solvent concentration did not exerts any effects on cell viability. After 24 h, cells were incubated at increasing concentrations of Gd-E4 extract (0.15–0.75–1.5 µg/mL) and then UV-irradiated. N-acetylcysteine (NAC 5 mM), a synthetic antioxidant, that inhibits oxidative stress formation, was used as control [25,82].
To prevent UV light absorption by the cell culture medium, the medium was removed just prior to irradiation and replaced with a thin layer of PBS to cover the cells. All samples were exposed to UV radiation (lamp UV KW 254 nm) at dose rate of 105 erg/mm2/sec for 5 min, with a daily increase of 5 min, for a total of three days of exposure [59,83]. Cells not treated with Gd-E4 extract and not UV irradiated were cultivated as controls.
The viability of cells was measured using the MTT assay according to Mosmann [84]. Results were expressed as percentage of viable cells, respect to controls. Each experiment of viability was carried in six replicates.

4.4. Statistical Analysis

Data are reported as mean values ± standard deviation.
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed and Tukey was used as post hoc test for comparison of the means among samples. The degree of heterogeneity was assessed by the Cochran test [85] Significance was accepted at probabilities p < 0.05. ANOVA performed using STATISTICA (version 8.0, Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).

5. Conclusions

In addition to its significant ecological role, thanks to bioactive properties of its compounds, P. oceanica could be considered as a promising resource for human health.
This study provides a demonstration of the possible use of natural extracts obtained from fresh beach cast P. oceanica leaves as antioxidant and photo-protective agents for the skin protection.
Human skin was the main photo-oxidative target, being continuously exposed to UV radiation. This exposure can trigger a state of oxidative stress and damage at the cellular level. Scientific research has focused on the discovery of new natural compounds of marine origin in order to obtain molecules with important therapeutic properties for human health. Polyphenolic extracts from marine plants are potential candidates for the prevention of the harmful effects of UV radiation on the skin.
From our results, it can be concluded that the intrinsic antioxidant capacity of P. oceanica leaves extract ensures increased antioxidant capacity at the cellular level, confirming the importance of using in vitro cell systems and biomolecular markers for the research of bioactives for cosmeceutical applications. This allows reliable results to be obtained in order to validate the efficacy of bioactive molecules of marine origin.
This work contributes to the improvement of current research strategies thus allowing the development of future perspectives to better understand the mechanisms of photo-acclimation in marine flora and fauna and will enable us to obtain potent compounds that are beneficial for cosmeceutical and pharmaceutical applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S., C.M.M.; methodology, A.S., C.M.M.; validation, A.S. and C.M.M.; formal analysis, C.M.M., R.A., S.M.; Y.P., E.C., F.K., G.R.; investigation, A.S., C.M.M., C.H.; resources, A.S., C.M.M.; data curation, A.S., C.M.M., C.H.; writing—original draft preparation, R.A., S.M., F.K., E.C.; writing—review and editing, A.S., C.M.M., C.H.; supervision, A.S.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Y.P. was granted by a fellowship from Universitè de Brest, within the Erasmus + mobility; E.C. is supported by the PhD project NUTRAQUA “Production of high value-added nutraceuticals in a multitrophic aquaculture system within a closed-circuit marine hatchery”, funded by PON RI FSE-FESR (2014/2020) Action I.1–“Innovative PhDs with industrial characterization”, to University of Palermo, in partnership with LEMAR.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Benito-González, I.; López-Rubio, A.; Martínez-Abad, A.; Ballester, A.R.; Falcó, I.; González-Candelas, L.; Sánchez, G.; Lozano-Sánchez, J.; Borrás-Linares, I.; Segura-Carretero, A.; et al. In-depth characterization of bioactive extracts from posidonia oceanica waste biomass. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Rotter, A.; Barbier, M.; Bertoni, F.; Bones, A.M.; Cancela, M.L.; Carlsson, J.; Carvalho, M.F.; Cegłowska, M.; Chirivella-Martorell, J.; Conk Dalay, M.; et al. The Essentials of Marine Biotechnology. Front. Mar. Sci. 2021, 8, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cornara, L.; Pastorino, G.; Borghesi, B.; Salis, A.; Clericuzio, M.; Marchetti, C.; Damonte, G.; Burlando, B. Posidonia oceanica (L.) delile ethanolic extract modulates cell activities with skin health applications. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Wijesinghe, W.A.J.P.; Jeon, Y.J. Biological activities and potential cosmeceutical applications of bioactive components from brown seaweeds: A review. Phytochem. Rev. 2011, 10, 431–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Thiyagarasaiyar, K.; Goh, B.-H.; Jeon, Y.-J.; Yow, Y.-Y. Algae Metabolites in Cosmeceutical: An Overview of Current Applications and Challenges. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jahan, A.; Ahmad, I.Z.; Fatima, N.; Ansari, V.A.; Akhtar, J. Algal bioactive compounds in the cosmeceutical industry: A review. Phycologia 2019, 56, 410–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vasarri, M.; De Biasi, A.M.; Barletta, E.; Pretti, C.; Degl’Innocenti, D. An Overview of New Insights into the Benefits of the Seagrass Posidonia oceanica for Human Health. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Duarte, C.M.; Losada, I.J.; Hendriks, I.; Mazarrasa, I. The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2013, 3, 961–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bharathi, N.P.; Amudha, P.; Vanitha, V. Sea grasses—Novel marine nutraceuticals. Int. J. Pharma Bio. Sci. 2016, 7, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Choi, H.-G.; Lee, J.-H.; Park, H.-H.; Sayegh, F.A.Q. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity of Zostera marina L. Extract. ALGAE 2009, 24, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kannan, R.R.R.; Arumugam, R.; Anantharaman, P. In vitro antioxidant activities of ethanol extract from Enhalus acoroides (L.F.) Royle. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2010, 3, 898–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hua, K.F.; Hsu, H.Y.; Su, Y.C.; Lin, I.F.; Yang, S.S.; Chen, Y.M.; Chao, L.K. Study on the antiinflammatory activity of methanol extract from seagrass Zostera japonica. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Menajang, F.S.I.; Mahmudi, M.; Yanuhar, U.; Herawati, E.Y. Evaluation of phytochemical and superoxide dismutase activities of Enhalus acoroides (L.f.) Royle from coastal waters of North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Vet World. 2020, 13, 676–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Boudouresque, C.F.; Bernard, G.; Bonhomme, P.; Charbonnel, E.; Diviacco, G.; Meinesz, A.; Pergent, G.; Pergent-Martini, C.; Ruitton, S.; Tunesi, L. Préservation et Conservation des Herbiers à Posidonia Oceanica; Ramoge Pub: Marseille, France, 2006; pp. 1–202. ISBN 2905540303. [Google Scholar]
  15. European Community. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21st May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora. Off. J.Eur.Union 1992, L206, 7–50. [Google Scholar]
  16. Salomidi, M.; Katsanevakis, S.; Borja, Á.; Braeckman, U.; Damalas, D.; Galparsoro, I.; Mifsud, R.; Mirto, S.; Pascual, M.; Pipitone, C.; et al. Assessment of goods and services, vulnerability, and conservation status of European seabed biotopes: A stepping stone towards ecosystem-based marine spatial management. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2012, 13, 49–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Rotini, A.; Chiesa, S.; Manfra, L.; Borrello, P.; Piermarini, R.; Silvestri, C.; Cappucci, S.; Parlagreco, L.; Devoti, S.; Pisapia, M.; et al. Effectiveness of the “ecological beach” model: Beneficial management of posidonia beach casts and banquette. Water 2020, 12, 3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Legislative Decree of 29 April 2010, n. 75 Riordino e Revisione Della Disciplina in Materia di Fertilizzanti, a Norma Dell’articolo 13 Della Legge 7 Luglio 2009, n. 88 In GU N. 121 DEL 26 MAGGIO 2010. Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2010/05/26/010G0096/sg (accessed on 10 September 2020).
  19. Ministry Decree/Decreto Ministeriale del Ministero Delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali del 22 Gennaio 2009 Aggiornamento Degli Allegati al Decreto Legislativo 29 Aprile 2006, n. 217, Concernente la Revisione Della Disciplina in Materia di Fertilizzanti in GU n.88 del 16-04-2009. Available online: www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2009/04/16/09A03940/sg (accessed on 10 September 2020).
  20. Leri, M.; Ramazzotti, M.; Vasarri, M.; Peri, S.; Barletta, E.; Pretti, C.; Degl’Innocenti, D. Bioactive compounds from Posidonia oceanica (L.) delile impair malignant cell migration through autophagy modulation. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Heglmeier, A.; Zidorn, C. Secondary metabolites of Posidonia oceanica (Posidoniaceae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2010, 38, 964–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Subhashini, P.; Dilipan, E.; Thangaradjou, T.; Papenbrock, J. Bioactive natural products from marine angiosperms: Abundance and functions. Rev. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect 2013, 3, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Messina, C.M.; Troia, A.; Arena, R.; Manuguerra, S.; Ioannou, T.; Curcuraci, E.; Renda, G.; Hellio, C.; Santulli, A. Species-specific antioxidant power and bioactive properties of the extracts obtained from wild mediterranean Calendula spp. (Asteraceae). Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Messina, C.M.; Manuguerra, S.; Catalano, G.; Arena, R.; Cocchi, M.; Morghese, M.; Montenegro, L.; Santulli, A. Green biotechnology for valorisation of residual biomasses in nutraceutic sector: Characterization and extraction of bioactive compounds from grape pomace and evaluation of the protective effects in vitro. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 35, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Manuguerra, S.; Caccamo, L.; Mancuso, M.; Arena, R.; Rappazzo, A.C.; Genovese, L.; Santulli, A.; Messina, C.M.; Maricchiolo, G. The antioxidant power of horseradish, Armoracia rusticana, underlies antimicrobial and antiradical effects, exerted in vitro. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020, 34, 1567–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Messina, C.M.; Renda, G.; Laudicella, V.A.; Trepos, R.; Fauchon, M.; Hellio, C.; Santulli, A. From ecology to biotechnology, study of the defense strategies of algae and halophytes (from trapani saltworks, NW sicily) with a focus on antioxidants and antimicrobial properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Carocho, M.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. A review on antioxidants, prooxidants and related controversy: Natural and synthetic compounds, screening and analysis methodologies and future perspectives. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 51, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zheng, W.; Wang, S.Y. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in selected herbs. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 5165–5170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bibi, F.; Naseer, M.I.; Hassan, A.M.; Yasir, M.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.K.; Azhar, E.I. Diversity and antagonistic potential of bacteria isolated from marine grass Halodule uninervis. 3 Biotech 2018, 8, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Pinazo-Durán, M.D.; Gallego-Pinazo, R.; García-Medina, J.J.; Zanón-Moreno, V.; Nucci, C.; Dolz-Marco, R.; Martínez-Castillo, S.; Galbis-Estrada, C.; Marco-Ramírez, C.; López-Gálvez, M.I.; et al. Clinical Interventions in Aging Dovepress Oxidative stress and its downstream signaling in aging eyes. Clin. Interv. Aging 2014, 2014, 637–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Vasarri, M.; Leri, M.; Barletta, E.; Ramazzotti, M.; Marzocchini, R.; Degl’Innocenti, D. Anti-inflammatory properties of the marine plant Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 247, 112252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Astudillo-Pascual, M.; Domínguez, I.; Aguilera, P.A.; Garrido Frenich, A. New phenolic compounds in posidonia oceanica seagrass: A comprehensive array using high resolution mass spectrometry. Plants 2021, 10, 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ammar, N.M.; Hassan, H.A.; Mohammed, M.A.; Serag, A.; Abd El-Alim, S.H.; Elmotasem, H.; El Raey, M.; El Gendy, A.N.; Sobeh, M.; Abdel-Hamid, A.H.Z. Metabolomic profiling to reveal the therapeutic potency ofPosidonia oceanicananoparticles in diabetic rats. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 8398–8410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Aseervatham, G.S.B.; Sivasudha, T.; Jeyadevi, R.; Arul Ananth, D. Environmental factors and unhealthy lifestyle influence oxidative stress in humans--an overview. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2013, 20, 4356–4369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Al-Gubory, K.H. Environmental pollutants and lifestyle factors induce oxidative stress and poor prenatal development. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2014, 29, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Corinaldesi, C.; Barone, G.; Marcellini, F.; Dell’Anno, A.; Danovaro, R. Marine microbial-derived molecules and their potential use in cosmeceutical and cosmetic products. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zidorn, C. Secondary metabolites of seagrasses (Alismatales and Potamogetonales; Alismatidae): Chemical diversity, bioactivity, and ecological function. Phytochemistry 2016, 124, 5–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Rice-Evans, C. Plant polyphenols: Free radical scavengers or chain-breaking antioxidants? Biochem. Soc. Symp. 1995, 61, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Michalak, A. Phenolic compounds and their antioxidant activity in plants growing under heavy metal stress. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2006, 15, 523–530. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gião, M.S.; Pereira, C.I.; Fonseca, S.C.; Pintado, M.E.; Malcata, F.X. Effect of particle size upon the extent of extraction of antioxidant power from the plants Agrimonia eupatoria, Salvia sp. and Satureja montana. Food Chem. 2009, 117, 412–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Franco, D.; Sineiro, J.; Rubilar, M.; Sánchez, M.; Jerez, M.; Pinelo, M.; Costoya, N.; Núñez, M.J. Polyphenols from plant materials: Extraction and antioxidant power. Electron. J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 7, 3210–3216. [Google Scholar]
  42. Alothman, M.; Bhat, R.; Karim, A.A. Antioxidant capacity and phenolic content of selected tropical fruits from Malaysia, extracted with different solvents. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 785–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shi, J.; Yu, J.; Pohorly, J.; Young, J.C.; Bryan, M.; Wu, Y. Optimization of the extraction of polyphenols from grape seed meal by aqueous ethanol solution. Food Agric. Environ. 2003, 1, 42–47. [Google Scholar]
  44. Anwar, F.; Kalsoom, U.; Sultana, B.; Mushtaq, M.; Mehmood, T.; Arshad, H.A. Effect of drying method and extraction solvent on the total phenolics and antioxidant activity of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L.) Extracts. Int. Food Res. J. 2013, 20, 653–659. [Google Scholar]
  45. Grignon-Dubois, M.; Rezzonico, B. Phenolic fingerprint of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica from four locations in the Mediterranean Sea: First evidence for the large predominance of chicoric acid. Bot. Mar. 2015, 58, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lim, Y.Y.; Murtijaya, J. Antioxidant properties of Phyllanthus amarus extracts as affected by different drying methods. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 40, 1664–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chan, E.W.C.; Lim, Y.Y.; Wong, S.K.; Lim, K.K.; Tan, S.P.; Lianto, F.S.; Yong, M.Y. Effects of different drying methods on the antioxidant properties of leaves and tea of ginger species. Food Chem. 2009, 113, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Le Lann, K.; Jégou, C.; Stiger-Pouvreau, V. Effect of different conditioning treatments on total phenolic content and antioxidant activities in two Sargassacean species: Comparison of the frondose Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt and the cylindrical Bifurcaria bifurcata R. Ross. Phycol. Res. 2008, 56, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cannac, M.; Ferrat, L.; Barboni, T.; Pergent, G.; Pasqualini, V. The influence of tissue handling on the flavonoid content of the aquatic plant Posidonia oceanica. J. Chem. Ecol. 2007, 33, 1083–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Liazid, A.; Palma, M.; Brigui, J.; Barroso, C.G. Investigation on phenolic compounds stability during microwave-assisted extraction. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1140, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mrkìc, V.; Cocci, E.; Rosa, M.D.; Sacchetti, G. Effect of drying conditions on bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006, 86, 1559–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mukherjee, P.K.; Maity, N.; Nema, N.K.; Sarkar, B.K. Bioactive compounds from natural resources against skin aging. Phytomedicine 2011, 19, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pallela, R.; Na-Young, Y.; Kim, S.K. Anti-photoaging and photoprotective compounds derived from marine organisms. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 1189–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Edreva, A.; Velikova, V.; Tsonev, T.; Dagnon, S.; Gesheva, E. Stress-protective role of secondary metabolites: Diversity of functions and mechanisms. Gen. Appl. Plant. Physiol. 2008, 34, 67–68. [Google Scholar]
  55. Svobodová, A.; Psotová, J.; Walterová, D. Natural phenolics in the prevention of UV-induced skin damage. A review. Biomed. Pap. Med. Fac. Univ. Palacky. Olomouc. Czech. Repub. 2003, 147, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Cao, C.; Lu, S.; Kivlin, R.; Wallin, B.; Card, E.; Bagdasarian, A.; Tamakloe, T.; Wang, W.-J.; Song, X.; Chu, W.M.; et al. SIRT1 confers protection against UVB- and H2O2-induced cell death via modulation of p53 and JNK in cultured skin keratinocytes. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2009, 13, 3632–3643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Masaki, H. Role of antioxidants in the skin: Anti-aging effects. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2010, 58, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Barletta, E.; Ramazzotti, M.; Fratianni, F.; Pessani, D.; Degl’Innocenti, D. Hydrophilic extract from Posidonia oceanic inhibits activity and expression of gelatinases and prevents HT1080 human fibrosarcoma cell line invasion. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2015, 9, 422–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Debacq-Chainiaux, F.; Leduc, C.; Verbeke, A.; Toussaint, O. UV, stress and aging. Dermatoendocrinology 2012, 4, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Montenegro, L.; Messina, C.M.; Manuguerra, S.; Santagati, L.M.; Pasquinucci, L.; Turnaturi, R.; Parenti, C.; Arena, R.; Santulli, A. In vitro antioxidant activity and in vivo topical efficacy of lipid nanoparticles co-loadingm idebenone and tocopheryl acetate. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Lee, S.-G.; Kang, H. Evaluation of Antioxidant and Anti-neuroinflammatory Activities of Hizikia fusiformis (Harvey) Okamura Extract. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2015, 14, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Arena, R.; Manuguerra, S.; Collins, E.; Mahdhi, A.; Renda, G.; Messina, C.M.; Santulli, A. Antioxidant properties of a supercritical fluid extract of the halophyte Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum L. from sicilian coasts: Nutraceutical and cosmeceutical applications. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Maqsood, S.; Benjakul, S.; Abushelaibi, A.; Alam, A. Phenolic Compounds and Plant Phenolic Extracts as Natural Antioxidants in Prevention of Lipid Oxidation in Seafood: A Detailed Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 1125–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dhouibi, N.; Manuguerra, S.; Arena, R.; Mahdhi, A.; Messina, C.M.; Santulli, A.; Dhaouadi, H. Screening of Antioxidant Potentials and Bioactive Properties of the Extracts Obtained from Two Centaurea L. Species (C. kroumirensis Coss. and C. sicula L. subsp sicula). Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Poljšak, B.; Dahmane, R. Free radicals and extrinsic skin aging. Dermatol. Res. Pract. 2012, 2012, 135206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Xu, H.; Yan, Y.; Li, L.; Peng, S.; Qu, T.; Wang, B. Ultraviolet B-induced apoptosis of human skin fibroblasts involves activation of caspase-8 and -3 with increased expression of vimentin. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2010, 26, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Yang, Y.; Li, S. Dandelion Extracts Protect Human Skin Fibroblasts from UVB Damage and Cellular Senescence. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2015, 2015, 619560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Pacheco-Palencia, L.A.; Noratto, G.; Hingorani, L.; Talcott, S.T.; Mertens-Talcott, S.U. Protective Effects of Standardized Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Polyphenolic Extract in Ultraviolet-Irradiated Human Skin Fibroblasts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 8434–8441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Deidun, A.; Saliba, S.; Schembri, P.J. Quantitative assessment and physical characterisation of Posidonia oceanica wrack beached along the Maltese coastline. Biol. Mar. Mediterr. 2011, 18, 307–308. [Google Scholar]
  70. Guala, I.; Simone, S.; Cristina, B.M.; Flagella, S.; Baroli, M.; De Falco, G. Posidonia Oceanica ‘banquettes’ removal: Environmental Impact and Management implications. Biol. Mar. Mediterr. 2006, 13, 149–153. [Google Scholar]
  71. Simeone, S.; De Falco, G. Morphology and composition of beach-cast Posidonia oceanica litter on beaches with different exposures. Geomorphology 2012, 151–152, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gharbi, S.; Renda, G.; La Barbera, L.; Amri, M.; Messina, C.M.; Santulli, A. Tunisian tomato by-products, as a potential source of natural bioactive compounds. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 626–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fish, W.W.; Perkins-Veazie, P.; Collins, J.K. A Quantitative Assay for Lycopene That Utilizes Reduced Volumes of Organic Solvents. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2002, 15, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Musa, K.H.; Abdullah, A.; Jusoh, K.; Subramaniam, V. Antioxidant Activity of Pink-Flesh Guava (Psidium guajava L.): Effect of Extraction Techniques and Solvents. Food Anal. Methods 2011, 4, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Singleton, V.L.; Rossi, J.A. Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1965, 16, 144–158. [Google Scholar]
  76. Krishnaiah, D.; Sarbatly, R.; Nithyanandam, R. A review of the antioxidant potential of medicinal plant species. Food Bioprod. Process. 2011, 89, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Oki, T.; Masuda, M.; Furuta, S.; Nishiba, Y.; Terahara, N.; Suda, I. Involvement of anthocyanins and other phenolic compounds in radical-scavenging activity of purple-fleshed sweet potato cultivars. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 1752–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Puigventós, L.; Navarro, M.; Alechaga, É.; Núñez, O.; Saurina, J.; Hernández-Cassou, S.; Puignou, L. Determination of polyphenolic profiles by liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry for the authentication of fruit extracts. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015, 407, 597–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Robbins, R.J.; Bean, S.R. Development of a quantitative high-performance liquid chromatography- photodiode array detection measurement system for phenolic acids. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1038, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yeddes, N.; Chérif, J.; Guyot, S.; Sotin, H.; Ayadi, M. Comparative Study of Antioxidant Power, Polyphenols, Flavonoids and Betacyanins of the Peel and Pulp of Three Tunisian Opuntia Forms. Antioxidants 2013, 2, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Abbes, M.; Baati, H.; Guermazi, S.; Messina, C.; Santulli, A.; Gharsallah, N.; Ammar, E. Biological properties of carotenoids extracted from Halobacterium halobium isolated from a Tunisian solar saltern. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 13, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Saija, A.; Tomaino, A.; Trombetta, D.; Pellegrino, M.L.; Tita, B.; Messina, C.; Bonina, F.P.; Rocco, C.; Nicolosi, G.; Castelli, F. “In vitro” antioxidant and photoprotective properties and interaction with model membranes of three new quercetin esters. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2003, 56, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Underwood, A.J. Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation using Analysis of Variance; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997; ISBN 0521556961. [Google Scholar]
Marinedrugs 19 00560 g001 550
Figure 1. Total phenolic content (mg GAE/g P. oceanica) of extracts obtained from fresh and dried leaves of P. oceanica. G: green fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; H: half-green fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; B: brown fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; Gd-M1: methanol 80% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground once; Gd-M4: methanol 80% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground four times; Gd-E1: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground once; Gd-E4: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground four times; Gd37-E: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 37 °C and ground four times. Results are given as means ± SD. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different extract (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Total phenolic content (mg GAE/g P. oceanica) of extracts obtained from fresh and dried leaves of P. oceanica. G: green fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; H: half-green fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; B: brown fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; Gd-M1: methanol 80% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground once; Gd-M4: methanol 80% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground four times; Gd-E1: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground once; Gd-E4: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground four times; Gd37-E: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 37 °C and ground four times. Results are given as means ± SD. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different extract (p < 0.05).
Marinedrugs 19 00560 g001
Marinedrugs 19 00560 g002 550
Figure 2. IC50 (µg/µL) of extracts of leaves of P. oceanica (in yellow) and IC 50 of four standards of the antioxidant power (in blue). G: green fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; H: half-green fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; B: brown fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; Gd-M1: methanol 80% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground once; Gd-M4: methanol 80% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground four times; Gd-E1: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground once; Gd-E4: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground four times; Gd37-E: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 37 °C and ground four times. Results are given as means ± SD. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different extract (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. IC50 (µg/µL) of extracts of leaves of P. oceanica (in yellow) and IC 50 of four standards of the antioxidant power (in blue). G: green fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; H: half-green fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; B: brown fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; Gd-M1: methanol 80% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground once; Gd-M4: methanol 80% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground four times; Gd-E1: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground once; Gd-E4: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground four times; Gd37-E: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 37 °C and ground four times. Results are given as means ± SD. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different extract (p < 0.05).
Marinedrugs 19 00560 g002
Marinedrugs 19 00560 g003 550
Figure 3. Cell viability test in HS-68 treatment with different concentration of Gd-E4 (ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground four times) (0.15–1.5 µg/mL) for 24 h and subjected to the experiment induced stress with UV radiation. Control: fibroblasts maintained in standard culture conditions; EtOH: fibroblasts maintained in standard culture conditions with ethanol 0.1%; NAC: cell pretreated with the synthetic antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (5 mM); Gd-E4: cells pretreated with increasing doses of leaf extracts ground four times in ethanol 70%. −UV: fibroblasts not exposed to UV radiation; +UV: fibroblasts exposed to UV radiation. Bars represent the mean ± sd (n = 6). Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA; p < 0.05) among group.
Figure 3. Cell viability test in HS-68 treatment with different concentration of Gd-E4 (ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground four times) (0.15–1.5 µg/mL) for 24 h and subjected to the experiment induced stress with UV radiation. Control: fibroblasts maintained in standard culture conditions; EtOH: fibroblasts maintained in standard culture conditions with ethanol 0.1%; NAC: cell pretreated with the synthetic antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (5 mM); Gd-E4: cells pretreated with increasing doses of leaf extracts ground four times in ethanol 70%. −UV: fibroblasts not exposed to UV radiation; +UV: fibroblasts exposed to UV radiation. Bars represent the mean ± sd (n = 6). Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA; p < 0.05) among group.
Marinedrugs 19 00560 g003
Marinedrugs 19 00560 g004 550
Figure 4. Flowchart of the experimental design.
Figure 4. Flowchart of the experimental design.
Marinedrugs 19 00560 g004
Table
Table 1. Concentrations (µg/g) in phenolic compounds of extracts of leaves of P. oceanica with different treatments. G: green fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; H: half-green fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; B: brown fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; Gd-M1: methanol 80% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground once; Gd-M4: methanol 80% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground four times; Gd-E1: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground once; Gd-E4: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground four times; Gd37-E: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 37 °C and ground four times.
Table 1. Concentrations (µg/g) in phenolic compounds of extracts of leaves of P. oceanica with different treatments. G: green fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; H: half-green fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; B: brown fresh leaf ethanol 70% extracts; Gd-M1: methanol 80% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground once; Gd-M4: methanol 80% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground four times; Gd-E1: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground once; Gd-E4: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 60 °C and ground four times; Gd37-E: ethanol 70% extracts from green leaves dried at 37 °C and ground four times.
Phenolic CompoundsGHBGd-M1Gd-M4Gd-E1Gd-E4Gd37-E
Phloroglucinol25.6064.13115.83195.95104.60382.159102.085117.296
Gallic Acid103.15925.57229.57299.883271.192199.412411.845472.836
ρ-hydroxybenzoic Acid208.7296.6757.91002.714519.272110.807
Vanillic Acid76.2693.85721.942111.61478.03566.206131.375161.822
Caffeic Acid36.8895.01212.869153.203128.94787.069193.761120.565
ρ-coumaric Acid25.2376.74913.03392.72939.4835.68587.501150.997
Ferulic Acid23.3359.3215.63586.09860.81446.10683.42282.53
Chicoric Acid48.7464.38512.7041873.1882270.2111208.2034991.8132843.772
Quercetin26.9931.9929.7165.89157.74346.599105.185135.457
Total574.96367.693139.2042778.5563011.0251774.1536626.2594196.08
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Messina, C.M.; Arena, R.; Manuguerra, S.; Pericot, Y.; Curcuraci, E.; Kerninon, F.; Renda, G.; Hellio, C.; Santulli, A. Antioxidant Bioactivity of Extracts from Beach Cast Leaves of Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19100560

AMA Style

Messina CM, Arena R, Manuguerra S, Pericot Y, Curcuraci E, Kerninon F, Renda G, Hellio C, Santulli A. Antioxidant Bioactivity of Extracts from Beach Cast Leaves of Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile. Marine Drugs. 2021; 19(10):560. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19100560

Chicago/Turabian Style

Messina, Concetta Maria, Rosaria Arena, Simona Manuguerra, Yann Pericot, Eleonora Curcuraci, Fanny Kerninon, Giuseppe Renda, Claire Hellio, and Andrea Santulli. 2021. "Antioxidant Bioactivity of Extracts from Beach Cast Leaves of Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile" Marine Drugs 19, no. 10: 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19100560

APA Style

Messina, C. M., Arena, R., Manuguerra, S., Pericot, Y., Curcuraci, E., Kerninon, F., Renda, G., Hellio, C., & Santulli, A. (2021). Antioxidant Bioactivity of Extracts from Beach Cast Leaves of Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile. Marine Drugs, 19(10), 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19100560

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop