Next Article in Journal
Gelatin and Antioxidant Peptides from Gelatin Hydrolysate of Skipjack Tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) Scales: Preparation, Identification and Activity Evaluation
Next Article in Special Issue
A New β-Galactosidase from the Antarctic Bacterium Alteromonas sp. ANT48 and Its Potential in Formation of Prebiotic Galacto-Oligosaccharides
Previous Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Sesquiterpenoid Derivatives and Monoterpenoids from the Deep-Sea Sediment-Derived Fungus Aspergillus versicolor SD-330
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Characterization and Modification of a Novel Bifunctional and Robust Alginate Lyase Derived from Marinimicrobium sp. H1
Article

Unraveling the Detoxification Mechanism of 2,4-Dichlorophenol by Marine-Derived Mesophotic Symbiotic Fungi Isolated from Marine Invertebrates

1
Industrial Biotechnology & Biocatalysis Group, Biotechnology Laboratory, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Pesticides Control and Phytopharmacy, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 14561 Kifissia, Greece
3
Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles, ICSN, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS, 91198 Gif sur Yvette, France
4
iMare Natural S.L., 18600 Granada, Spain
5
Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
6
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
7
Division of Pharmacognosy and Chemistry of Natural Products, Department of Pharmacy, University of Athens, 15771 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2019, 17(10), 564; https://doi.org/10.3390/md17100564
Received: 31 August 2019 / Revised: 24 September 2019 / Accepted: 26 September 2019 / Published: 30 September 2019

Abstract

Chlorophenols (CPs) are environmental pollutants that are produced through various anthropogenic activities and introduced in the environment. Living organisms, including humans, are exposed to these toxic xenobiotics and suffer from adverse health effects. More specifically, 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP) is released in high amounts in the environment and has been listed as a priority pollutant by the US Environmental Protection Agency. Bioremediation has been proposed as a sustainable alternative to conventional remediation methods for the detoxification of phenolic compounds. In this work, we studied the potential of fungal strains isolated as symbionts of marine invertebrates from the underexplored mesophotic coral ecosystems. Hence, the unspecific metabolic pathways of these fungal strains are being explored in the present study, using the powerful analytical capabilities of a UHPLC-HRMS/MS. The newly identified 2,4-DCP metabolites add significantly to the knowledge of the transformation of such pollutants by fungi, since such reports are scarce.
Keywords: 2,4-dichlorophenol; bioremediation; marine-derived fungi; invertebrate symbionts; mesophotic zone; metabolite analysis; HRMS/MS 2,4-dichlorophenol; bioremediation; marine-derived fungi; invertebrate symbionts; mesophotic zone; metabolite analysis; HRMS/MS

1. Introduction

In everyday life, we come across over 60,000 chemicals in the types of consumer products, drugs, pesticides, food additives, fuels, and industrial solvents [1]. Chlorophenols (CPs) constitute a class of organic compounds containing at least one chlorine atom attached on a phenol moiety. CPs are introduced in the environment as metabolites of herbicides and other chlorinated xenobiotics or through anthropogenic activities as effluent discharge of industrial processes; for instance, pulp bleaching, dye manufacturing, water disinfection with chlorine, waste burning, and wood waste incineration [2,3].
These compounds can be detected in water, soil and the atmosphere after volatilization and they can also accumulate in the adipose tissue of living organisms due to their lipophilicity [2,3]. 2,4-Dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP) has been widely used as a fungicide, pesticide, and wood preservative [4], being released in high amounts into the environment (ca. 10,000 kg in the US during 2014) according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), who listed it as a priority pollutant among other CPs [2,5]. Human exposure to CPs takes places by consuming substances that contain them or through skin [6]. CPs are toxic, endocrine disrupting substances that have been associated with a variety of adverse health effects such as oxidative stress, cytotoxicity, mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, and apoptosis induction [2,6,7].
Several physicochemical methods have been used so far for the remediation of phenolic compounds including photocatalysis, ozonation, liquid–liquid or solid-state extraction, adsorption, ion-exchange, membrane-based separation, electro-Fenton reaction, mixing coagulation and supersonic chemistry, many of which suffer from several disadvantages such as high operational cost and incomplete degradation [8,9].
Bioremediation is the use of living organisms in order to remove pollutants from soil and water; a method that is considered more cost-effective and environmentally friendly than the conventional techniques mentioned above [5,8]. Microorganisms—mainly bacteria and fungi—indigenous to the contaminated regions are potential candidates for the task, benefiting from their acquired enzymatic arsenal, aiming to use the contaminants as food, ideally towards their complete mineralization [10]. Fungi are robust organisms and most of them are usually more tolerant to high concentrations of pollutants compared to bacteria [10].
The marine environment is an untapped source of microbial diversity, showing various characteristics valuable for biotechnological applications, including bioremediation [11], especially considering that a great part of the Earth’s pollution appears in the oceans. An exceptionally under-investigated source of marine biodiversity is the fungal symbionts of marine invertebrates (e.g., ascidians, cnidarians, and sponges) [11] and more specifically the ones residing in the mesophotic zone. Mesophotic coral ecosystems (MCEs) are tropical or sub-tropical light-dependent habitats located at 30–40 m below the sea level and extend as deep as 150 m. Even though they are known for the rich biodiversity, they remain relatively under investigated, due to the limitations imposed by their location. Only recently, they have gained more attention as a result of the technological advances, such as remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) and autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) [12].
Microorganisms derived from pristine environments do not necessarily possess the ability to detoxify halogenated organic pollutants, as they are unlikely to have ever come across such molecules in order to evolve special detoxification mechanisms. However, there are natural halogenated compounds found in the sea [13], some of them similar to manmade pollutants, like brominated diphenyl ethers. Many sessile organisms, such as sponges and corals (or their symbionts), are thought to produce organohalogens as a defense against predators [14]. Therefore, marine-derived invertebrate symbionts may have the potential to bioconvert halogenated aromatic compounds.
The present work describes the screening of 60 fungal strains isolated from pristine MCEs habitats as symbionts of invertebrates for their potential in bioremediation of 2,4-DCP. The strains that showed the highest 2,4-DCP bioconversion yield were chosen for further investigation of their metabolic pathways.

2. Results and Discussion

Mesophotic coral ecosystems have been rather neglected by scientists, compared to the shallow reefs, mostly because of technical challenges. The data we have obtained about the biodiversity of these ecosystems are rather biased due to the limited geographical regions investigated so far, namely the Western Atlantic Ocean, the Hawaiian Archipelago, the Great Barrier Reef (Australia), and the Red Sea [15]. In this work, we tried to access the biodiversity of symbiotic fungal strains isolated from mesophotic invertebrates and their potential in bioremediation of 2,4-DCP. The fungi were isolated from invertebrates collected in four different locations, namely Andaman Sea, Eilat (northern Red Sea), West and East Mediterranean Sea. The invertebrates were corals and sponges (see Table 1).
Among the 60 isolates screened, 52 have the capability to convert significantly 2,4-DCP (Table 1). 81% of them belong to three genera—Aspergillus (31%), Penicillium (33%), and Cladosporium (17%). Twenty isolates convert 2,4-DCP over 40% at 1 mM initial concentration, including 7 Aspergillus, 8 Penicillium, 2 Cladosporium, 1 Obolarina, 1 Pseudocercosporella, and 1 Chrysosporium species. However, the capacity of conversion could not be linked to the area of collection, the depth nor the nature of the host invertebrate, indicating that only the genetic background and metabolic capabilities of specific genera is required and is slightly impacted by environmental habitat condition.
Marine-derived fungi are promising microorganisms to be utilized for biotechnological applications, thanks to unique properties they acquired through their adaptation to extreme environmental conditions, such as high salinity, low oxygen concentration, high pressure, temperature, and low nutrient availability [11,16]. So far, marine-derived fungi have been employed for the bioremediation of crude oil components, like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs— phenanthrene, pyrene, benzo[a]pyrene) and aliphatic alkenes, but also 1,4,6-trinitrotoluene and hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine, originating from unexploded ordnance [16,17,18]. There are also some reports regarding the degradation of pesticides—most of them chlorinated compounds—like 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis-(4-chlorophenyl)ethane (DDD), esfenvalerate, dieldrin, and methyl parathion [16].

2.1. 2,4-DCP Biotransformation Potential of Isolated Fungi

In the present work, the fungal isolates were tested for their ability to transform the environmental pollutant 2,4-DCP in resting-cell reactions. The transformation yield of 2,4-DCP for each of the 52 strains at the 10th reaction day is presented in Table 1. Only 9 microorganisms were able to reach over 50% bioconversion yield. Out of these, five could bioconvert the pollutant at percentages over 55%, namely Penicillium steckii TM2-S5 (58.5%), Chrysosporium sp.TM9-S2 (74.0%), Penicillium sp. TM38-S1 (56.2%), Aspergillus creber TM122-S3 (62.0%), and Aspergillus sp. TM124-S1 (69.0%). It should be noted that the initial concentration of 2,4-DCP was high (1 mM or 163 mg L−1), therefore, only the strains with increased tolerance on this pollutant and high biotransformation potential could achieve increased yields.
Vroumsia et al. [19] screened 90 fungal strains able to detoxify other xenobiotics (phenylurea herbicides, pentachloronitrobenzene, and pentachlorophenol) for their ability to biodegrade 2,4-DCP at initial concentration of 100 mg L−1. Out of these, only three were able to reach yields above 50%, after 5 d. A Bacillus strain that was isolated from chlorophenol enrichment cultures of a paper mill aeration pond could remove ~25% of 0.56 mM 2,4-DCP after 9 d [20]. A Pseudomonas putida strain not related to chlorophenols was able to remove 35% from 51 mg L−1 2,4-DCP [21]. In the same manner, Basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium could bioconvert ~20% of 100 mg L−1 2,4-DCP in the presence of 2 mg L−1 cadmium. For initial concentrations higher than 40 mg L−1 2,4-DCP the total removal was less than 40% after 4.5 d [22].

2.2. Identification of 2,4-DCP Metabolites

When it comes to the biotransformation of CPs, the majority of studies use bacteria, while reports with fungi (let alone marine-derived) are very scarce. Bacteria of various genera have the ability to aerobically degrade all kinds of CPs. More specifically, representatives of the genera Pseudomonas, Rhodococcus, Bacillus, and Cupriavidus have the ability to degrade DCP [6]. The general mechanism for the bacterial aerobic degradation involves the initial ortho-hydroxylation of DCP, followed by the ortho-cleavage of the catechol scaffold and simultaneous release of the para chloride leading to 2-chloromaleylacetic acid, which is further dehalogenated [3]. Cupriavidus necator JMP222 is reported to degrade 2,4-DCP through a meta-cleavage pathway, yielding 2-hydroxy-3,5-dichloro-6-oxo-hexa-2,4-dienoic acid [6].
The detoxification of xenobiotics by higher organisms and fungi may take place in two stages known as phase I and phase II. Phase I involves the modification of the compound by the addition of a functional group, usually performed by cytochrome P450 enzymes. The products of phase I may then undergo conjugation reactions to form sulfates, glucuronides, glucosides, or glutathione conjugates. The phase II conjugation enzymes (sulfotransferases, glycosyltransferases, glutathione S-transferases) are non-specific, creating less-toxic metabolites that can be easily excreted from the cell and are typically not subjected to further modifications [23,24].
The increased resolving power of 70,000 at the full scan and of 35,000 of the MS/MS measurements in correlation with the accurate mass measurements (Δm < 5 ppm), of the Orbitrap analyzer allowed the safe characterization of several compounds in the reaction mixtures. Out of the characterized components, special attention was given to those indicated by the 2,4-DCP metabolism study, as possible metabolites and degradation products. Extended identification of the xenobiotic metabolites was performed by the Compound Discoverer 2.1 software (Thermo Fisher ScientificTM - San Jose, CA, USA) in comparison with internal spectral libraries. Those indicated compounds were further evaluated in comparison with data from literature and were finally indicated as intermediates or final products of the DCP metabolism in the presence of specific microbial strain. The highlighted compounds, described below, were not present in control samples. The suggested elemental composition (EC), the indicated ring double bond equivalents (RDBeq) and the special isotopic patterns for the chlorinated and sulphated molecules not only for the molecular ion, but also for the HRMS/MS fragment, helped significantly with the structural identification procedure.
The detected compounds indicated as 2,4-DCP metabolites, based on the above-mentioned identification procedure are presented in Table 2.
Out of the five strains tested, Chrysosporium sp. ΤΜ9-S2 was the richest in metabolites, containing all of the compounds mentioned in Table 2 except two, while Penicillium sp. TM38-S1 was the poorest in metabolites (only two detected). Overall, the only ‘Phase I’ metabolites identified were dichlorocatechol (or some kind of hydroxylated dichlorophenol) (11) and 2-chlorohydroquinone (or 4-chlorocatechol) (7) that were only present in Chrysosporium sp. ΤΜ9-S2. Dichlorocatechol was further metabolized to its corresponding palmitate (4), glucoside (8), and glutamine conjugates (2). Chlorohydroquinone was further conjugated with glutamine (1). Chrysosporium sp. ΤΜ9-S2 was able to transform 2,4-DCP to its cysteine conjugate (6), while also P. steckii TM2-S5 and A. creber TM122-S3 could reductively dechlorinate the initial compound to form chlorophenol (10). Chlorophenol was further transformed by Chrysosporium sp. ΤΜ9-S2 to its cysteine conjugates (5), when P. steckii TM2-S5, A. creber TM122-S3, and Aspergillus sp. TM124-S1 produced its sulphated metabolite (9). A fact that should be noted is that strains A. creber TM122-S3 and Aspergillus sp. TM124-S1 could completely oxidatively dechlorinate the initial compound to form hydroxyquinol (3), which could possibly be further assimilated by these strains.

2.3. Fungal Mechanisms for 2,4-DCP Detoxification

The mechanisms by which fungi deal with 2,4-DCP are much less studied compared to bacteria and also seem to be much more complicated and diverse. To our knowledge, this is the first report of several DCP metabolites mentioned above. The soil fungus Mortierella sp. could bioconvert DCP using two different pathways: the one involved the initial hydroxylation to dichlorocatechol and further methylation to dichloroguaiacol, while the second included the dechlorination of the para-chlorine yielding 2-chloro-hydroquinone (as in Chrysosporium sp. ΤΜ9-S2) and the subsequent dechlorination leading to hydroquinone [25]. Cunninghamella elegans expressed both Phase I and Phase II enzymatic activities for the bioconversion of xenobiotics including hydroxylase and demethylase, as well as glucuronosyl-, glycosyl-, and sulfotransferases. This fungus could also dechlorinate 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene by the use of a glutathione S-transferase [26]. The same fungus could use both oxidative and reductive mechanisms for the biotransformation of substituted naphthalene [27]. Apparently, a combination of oxidative and reductive dechlorination can take place in aerobic microorganisms like in the case of Flavobacterium sp., which could bioconvert pentachlorophenol firstly to tetrachlorohydroquinone by oxidative dechlorination and then have two more chlorine atoms removed by reductive dehalogenation [28]. The reductive dehalogenase of this bacterium that utilized glutathione as a reducing agent, was isolated and studied and it appeared to be similar to plant glutathione S-transferases [29,30]. Additionally, a marine-derived Trichoderma harzianum strain isolated from ascidian Didemnun ligulum could biotransform pentachlorophenol and produce pentachloroanisole and 2,3,4,6-tetrachloroanisole suggesting a reductive dehalogenation activity [31]. The white-rot fungus Coriolus versicolor followed different pathways for the transformation of the herbicide chloronitrofen—including hydroxylations, oxidative, and reductive dechlorination reactions [32].
Many other fungi, mostly white-rot, have the ability to transform DCP and other CPs by the powerful ligninolytic enzymatic activities expressed extracellularly. The products of these activities could be even more toxic than the initial CPs, like in case of chlorinated ethers and dioxins [33,34]. White-rot fungi Panus tigrinus and Coriolus versicolor showed the ability to bioconvert various CPs including DCP and 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (TCP) by inducing ligninolytic activities [35]. The TCP fungal metabolites were identified as 2,6-dichloro-1,4-hydroquinol (oxidative dechlorination) and 2,6-dichloro-1,4-benzoquinone. Phanerochaete chrysosporium is a well-known ligninolytic white-rot mushroom with the ability to transform DCP. All the metabolites identified from this strain were previously reported and include the halogenated compounds 2,4-dichloroanisole, 2-chloro-1,4-hydroquinone (present study), 2-chloro-1,4-benzoquinone, and 2-chloro-1,4-dimethoxybenzene [36]. Furthermore, several completely dechlorinated metabolites were detected, such as 2,5-dimethoxy-1,4-hydroquinone, 2,5-dimethoxy-1,4-benzoquinone, 2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoquinone, and 1,2,4,5-tetrahydroxybenzene. Stoilova et al. [37] studied the removal of high concentrations of DCP by Aspergillus awamori NRRL 3112 and even though no metabolites were identified, catechol 1,2-dioxygenase activity was detected suggesting that the degradation pathway is different than the ones described above. In our case, the catechol dioxygenase activities measured for all tested strains were very low, estimated less than 8 U mg−1 of expressed extracellular protein (data not shown).
Based on the above-mentioned literature and our identification methodology, we tried to create a schematic representation of the 2,4-DCP metabolic pathway by the tested fungal strains. Structural configurations presented in Figure 1 are tentative and are based on the most possible conformation according to the compound dynamics and data from literature. In the case of the compounds that are represented by two peaks with close retention times in the chromatograms, we assumed that more than one isomer is present.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals

2,4-DCP (99%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Organic solvents (acetonitrile and chloroform) were of HPLC grade (Fisher Chemical, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). LC-MS grade acetonitrile and formic acid were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Fisher Optima, Loughborough, UK) and LC-MS water was produced from SG Millipore apparatus.

3.2. Culture Conditions and Resting-Cell Reactions

Fungal strains were grown on Difco™ Marine Agar 2216 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) plates at 27 °C for 5 days. These plates were used to inoculate submerged cultures with Difco™ Marine Broth 2216 (pH 7.6) at 27 °C and 150 rpm shacking. After 5 days, the biomass was filtered using 0.2 μm-pore filters and used as a biocatalyst (10% w/v) in 15-mL reactions containing 1 mM DCP in ultrapure water. Reactions were left under mild shacking at 27 °C for 10 days. Samples were withdrawn on the third and sixth day and analyzed after filtration. On the final day, the remaining reaction was extracted with equal volume of chloroform and it was analyzed after drying and recovery in ultrapure water.

3.3. Identification of Fungal Strains

Genomic DNA of the strains were isolated using DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For each sample, the ITS rDNA region was amplified with primers ITS1F (5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC). Amplicons were sequenced by Sanger sequencing (Eurofins genomics, GATC Biotech, Konstanz, Germany) and the sequences were submitted to non-redundant database of the NCBI using BLASTn program (GenBank) and compared to the corresponding sequences.

3.4. Culture Conditions and Resting-Cell Reactions

Reaction samples were analyzed for the quantification of the remaining 2,4-DCP using a SHIMADZU LC-20AD HPLC equipped with a SIL-20A autosampler. A C-18 reverse-phase NUCLEOSIL® 100-5 (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) served as the stationary phase and 40% aqueous acetonitrile as the mobile phase (flow rate 0.8 mL min−1). Detection took place with the photodiode array detector Varian ProStar and the wavelength at which the absorption was recorded was 285 nm. The total running time was 16 min and the retention time of DCP was 12.4 min.

3.5. Identification of 2,4-DCP Metabolites by UHPLC-HRMS/MS

The analysis of the 2,4-DCP metabolites was performed by UHPLC-HRMS/MS spectrometry on a Q-Exactive Orbitrap platform (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA). The ultra-high performance liquid chromatography was performed employing a Dionex Ultimate 3000 UHPLC system (Thermo Scientific™ Dionex™, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) equipped with a binary pump, an autosampler, an online vacuum degasser, and a temperature-controlled column compartment. A Hypersil Gold UPLC C18 (2.1 × 150 mm, 1.9 μm) reversed phased column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA). was used for the analysis. The gradient phase consisted of solvents A: aqueous 0.1% (v/v) formic acid and B: acetonitrile. The gradient elution was: T = 0 min, 5% B; T = 2 min, 5% B, T = 23 min, 95% B, T = 28 min, 95% B, T = 28.1 min, 5% B; T = 30 min, 5% B. The flow rate was 0.220 mL/min and the injection volume was 3 μL. The column temperature was kept at 40 °C while the sample tray temperature was set at 10 °C.
The high-resolution mass spectrometry was performed on an Orbitrap Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA). The ionization was performed at HESI, both positive and negative modes. The conditions for the HRMS for both negative and positive ionization modes were set as follows: capillary temperature, 350 °C; spray voltage, 2.7 kV; S-lense Rf level, 50 V; sheath gas flow, 40 arb. units; aux gas flow, 5 arb. units; aux. gas heater Temperature, 50 °C. For the full scan experiments the resolution was 70,000. The data dependent acquisition capability has been also used at 35,000 resolution, allowing for MS/MS fragmentation of the three most intense ions of every peak exceeding the predefined threshold applying a 10 s dynamic exclusion. Stepped normalized collision energy was set at 40, 60, and 100. The acquisition of the mass spectra was performed in every case using the centroid mode. Data acquisition and analysis has been completed employing Xcalibur 2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany).
Data were imported to Compound Discoverer 2.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) and a standard metabolism workflow was selected in order to detect the possible DCP metabolites in the extracts. The appropriate set up for peak detection, deconvolution, deisotoping, and alignment was applied.
Results revealed several 2,4-DCP metabolites in resting cell reactions compared to control samples (just cells).

4. Conclusions

In the present work, we aimed in the investigation of the potential of marine-derived fungi for the detoxification of the 2,4-DCP. In order to accomplish that, we accessed the underexplored mesophotic zone, collecting marine invertebrates from different regions. The fungal symbionts of these invertebrates were isolated, identified, and used as whole-cell biocatalysts for the removal of 2,4-DCP. Even though these strains originate from non-polluted habitats, they showed high biotransformation potential. In an attempt to elucidate the mechanism by which these marine-derived microorganisms biotransform 2,4-DCP, we detected their metabolites using UHPLC-HRMS/MS analysis. Based on these results and the literature, we saw that the isolates use non-specific enzymatic activities in order to biotransform the xenobiotic and convert it to less toxic products.

Author Contributions

E.T., N.F., and J.O. conceived the investigation; E.N. and A.A. performed biocatalysis experiments; G.L.G. isolated and identified symbionts; A.T. and K.M. performed metabolite analysis; P.Á., S.C., and Y.B. collected and identified invertebrates; E.N. wrote the paper; E.T. supervised the project.

Funding

This study was supported by TASCMAR, a project funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 634674. This research is co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund- ESF) through the Operational Programme “Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning” in the context of the project “Strengthening Human Resources Research Potential via Doctorate Research” (MIS-5000432), implemented by the State Scholarships Foundation (ΙΚΥ).

Acknowledgments

Yehuda Benayahu would like to thank the Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences in Eilat (IUI) for the use of the Sam Rothberg R/V and the professional assistance of its crew members. We are indebted to EcoOcean staff members for operating the ROV. We acknowledge Michal Weis and Ronen Liberman and Erez Shoham for help in the field work and Alex Shlagman for curatorial skills. Collection of invertebrates in Eilat (northern Red Sea) and in the Israeli Mediterranean coast complied with a permit issued by the Israel Nature and National Parks Protection Authority.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Das, S.; Dash, H.R. Microbial bioremediation: A potential tool for restoration of contaminated areas. In Microbial Biodegradation and Bioremediation; Surajit Das, Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  2. Honda, M.; Kannan, K. Biomonitoring of chlorophenols in human urine from several Asian countries, Greece and the United States. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 232, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. El-Naas, M.H.; Mousa, H.A.; Gamal, M. El Microbial degradation of chlorophenols. In Microbe-Induced Degradation of Pesticides; Singh, S.N., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 23–58. [Google Scholar]
  4. Huang, Z.; Chen, G.; Zeng, G.; Chen, A.; Zuo, Y.; Guo, Z.; Tan, Q.; Song, Z.; Niu, Q. Polyvinyl alcohol-immobilized Phanerochaete chrysosporium and its application in the bioremediation of composite-polluted wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 289, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Patel, B.P.; Kumar, A. Biodegradation and co-metabolism of monochlorophenols and 2,4-dichlorophenol by microbial consortium. CLEAN Soil Air Water 2017, 45, 1700329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Arora, P.; Bae, H. Bacterial degradation of chlorophenols and their derivatives. Microb. Cell Fact. 2014, 13, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Patel, B.P.; Kumar, A. Biodegradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol by Bacillus endophyticus strain: Optimization of experimental parameters using response surface methodology and kinetic study. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 15932–15940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ren, H.; Li, Q.; Zhan, Y.; Fang, X.; Yu, D. 2,4-Dichlorophenol hydroxylase for chlorophenol removal: Substrate specificity and catalytic activity. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2016, 82, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Anku, W.W.; Mamo, M.A.; Govender, P.P. Phenolic compounds in water: Sources, reactivity, toxicity and treatment methods. In Phenolic Compounds—Natural Sources, Importance and Applications; Soto-Hernandez, M., Palma-Tenango, M., del Rosario Garcia-Mateos, M., Eds.; InTech: Vienna, Austria, 2017; pp. 419–443. [Google Scholar]
  10. Srivastava, S. Bioremediation Technology: A greener and sustainable approach for restoration of environmental pollution. In Applied Environmental Biotechnology: Present Scenario and Future Trends; Kaushik, G., Ed.; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2015; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nikolaivits, E.; Dimarogona, M.; Fokialakis, N.; Topakas, E. Marine-derived biocatalysts: Importance, accessing and application in aromatic pollutant bioremediation. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Turner, J.A.; Babcock, R.C.; Hovey, R.; Kendrick, G.A. Deep thinking: A systematic review of mesophotic coral ecosystems. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2017, 74, 2309–2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gribble, G. Biological activity of recently discovered halogenated marine natural products. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 4044–4136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Atashgahi, S.; Häggblom, M.M.; Smidt, H. Organohalide respiration in pristine environments: Implications for the natural halogen cycle. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 20, 934–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sinniger, F.; Ballantine, D.L.; Bejarano, I.; Colin, P.L.; Pochon, X.; Pomponi, S.A.; Puglise, K.A.; Pyle, R.L.; Reaka, M.; Spalding, H.L.; et al. Biodiversity of mesophotic coral ecosystems. In Mesophotic Coral Ecosystems: A Lifeboat for Coral Reefs; Baker, K.E., Puglise, K.A., Harris, P.T.H., Eds.; The United Nations Environment Programme and GRID-Arendal: Arendal, Norway, 2016; pp. 50–62. [Google Scholar]
  16. Nicoletti, R.; Andolfi, A. The marine-derived filamentous fungi in biotechnology. In Grand Challenges in Marine Biotechnology; Rampelotto, P.H., Trincone, A., Eds.; Springer: Champaign, IL, USA, 2018; pp. 157–189. [Google Scholar]
  17. Birolli, W.G.; de Santos, D.A.; Alvarenga, N.; Garcia, A.C.F.S.; Romão, L.P.C.; Porto, A.L.M. Biodegradation of anthracene and several PAHs by the marine-derived fungus Cladosporium sp. CBMAI 1237. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 129, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bovio, E.; Gnavi, G.; Prigione, V.; Spina, F.; Denaro, R.; Yakimov, M.; Calogero, R.; Crisafi, F.; Varese, G.C. The culturable mycobiota of a Mediterranean marine site after an oil spill: Isolation, identification and potential application in bioremediation. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 576, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Vroumsia, T.; Steiman, R.; Seigle-Murandi, F.; Benoit-Guyod, J.-L. Groupe pour l’Étude du Devenir des Xénobiotiques dans l’Environnement (GEDEXE) Fungal bioconversion of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP). Chemosphere 2005, 60, 1471–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Matafonova, G.; Shirapova, G.; Zimmer, C.; Giffhorn, F.; Batoev, V.; Kohring, G.-W. Degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol by Bacillus sp. isolated from an aeration pond in the Baikalsk pulp and paper mill (Russia). Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2006, 58, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kargi, F.; Eker, S. Kinetics of 2,4-dichlorophenol degradation by Pseudomonas putida CP1 in batch culture. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2005, 55, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, A.; Zeng, G.; Chen, G.; Fan, J.; Zou, Z.; Li, H.; Hu, X.; Long, F. Simultaneous cadmium removal and 2,4-dichlorophenol degradation from aqueous solutions by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 91, 811–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Marco-Urrea, E.; Reddy, C.A. Degradation of chloro-organic pollutants by white rot fungi. In Microbial Degradation of Xenobiotics. Environmental Science and Engineering; Singh, S., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 31–66. [Google Scholar]
  24. Aranda, E. Promising approaches towards biotransformation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with Ascomycota fungi. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016, 38, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nakagawa, A.; Osawa, S.; Hirata, T.; Yamagishi, Y.; Hosoda, J.; Horikoshi, T. 2,4-Dichlorophenol degradation by the soil fungus Mortierella sp. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2006, 70, 525–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, D.; Yang, Y.; Leakey, J.E.; Cerniglia, C.E. Phase I and phase II enzymes produced by Cunninghamella elegans for the metabolism of xenobiotics. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1996, 138, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mountfield, R.J.; Hopper, D.J. The formation of 1-hydroxymethylnaphthalene and 6-hydroxymethylquinoline by both oxidative and reductive routes in Cunninghamella elegans. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998, 50, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Steiert, J.G.; Crawford, R.L. Catabolism of pentachlorophenol by a Flavobacterium sp. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1986, 141, 825–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Orser, C.S.; Dutton, J.; Lange, C.; Jablonski, P.; Xun, L.; Hargis, M. Characterization of a Flavobacterium glutathione S-transferase gene involved reductive dechlorination. J. Bacteriol. 1993, 175, 2640–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Xun, L.; Topp, E.; Orser, C.S. Purification and characterization of a tetrachloro-p-hydroquinone reductive dehalogenase from a Flavobacterium sp. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 8003–8007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Vacondio, B.; Birolli, W.G.; Ferreira, I.M.; Seleghim, M.H.R.; Gonçalves, S.; Vasconcellos, S.P.; Porto, A.L.M. Biodegradation of pentachlorophenol by marine-derived fungus Trichoderma harzianum CBMAI 1677 isolated from ascidian Didemnun ligulum. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2015, 4, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hiratsuka, N.; Wariishi, H.; Tanaka, H. Degradation of diphenyl ether herbicides by the lignin-degrading basidiomycete Coriolus versicolor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 57, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Öberg, L.G.; Rappe, C. Biochemical formation of PCDD/Fs from chlorophenols. Chemosphere 1992, 25, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tsujiyama, S.; Muraoka, T.; Takada, N. Biodegradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol by shiitake mushroom (Lentinula edodes) using vanillin as an activator. Biotechnol. Lett. 2013, 35, 1079–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Leontievsky, A.A.; Myasoedova, N.M.; Baskunov, B.P.; Evans, C.S.; Golovleva, L.A. Transformation of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol by the white rot fungi Panus tigrinus and Coriolus versicolor. Biodegradation 2000, 11, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rubilar, O.; Diez, M.C.; Gianfreda, L. Transformation of chlorinated phenolic compounds by white rot fungi. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 38, 227–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Stoilova, I.; Krastanov, A.; Stanchev, V.; Daniel, D.; Gerginova, M.; Alexieva, Z. Biodegradation of high amounts of phenol, catechol, 2,4-dichlorophenol and 2,6-dimethoxyphenol by Aspergillus awamori cells. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2006, 39, 1036–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Proposed metabolic pathway for the detoxification of 2,4-DCP by the isolated mesophotic fungi. The isomers were suggested according to MS2 data and literature. For metabolites where there is no information about the most probable isomer, an asterisk has been added next to the molecule. The number next to each compound is the one corresponding to Table 2.
Figure 1. Proposed metabolic pathway for the detoxification of 2,4-DCP by the isolated mesophotic fungi. The isomers were suggested according to MS2 data and literature. For metabolites where there is no information about the most probable isomer, an asterisk has been added next to the molecule. The number next to each compound is the one corresponding to Table 2.
Marinedrugs 17 00564 g001
Table 1. Percentage of 2,4-DCP reduction in resting-cell reactions after 10 d for all isolated fungal strains, which were identified based on their ITS region. Information (region and depth) about the invertebrate host of each strain are given. Locations: East Mediterranean Sea (Med E), West Mediterranean Sea (Med W), northern Red Sea (Eilat), and Andaman Sea.
Table 1. Percentage of 2,4-DCP reduction in resting-cell reactions after 10 d for all isolated fungal strains, which were identified based on their ITS region. Information (region and depth) about the invertebrate host of each strain are given. Locations: East Mediterranean Sea (Med E), West Mediterranean Sea (Med W), northern Red Sea (Eilat), and Andaman Sea.
Isolate CodeInvertebrate of OriginLocationDepth (m)Isolate Identification% DCP
Removal
TM2-S5Sponge on top of SpondylusMed E38Penicillium steckii58.5
TM6-S1Dendronephthya sp.Eilat120Aspergillus tubingensis23.2
TM6-S2Dendronephthya sp.Eilat120Penicillium kewense9.3
TM37-S2Spondylus sp.Eilat49Penicillium chrysogenum49.2
TM38-S1Polycarpa sp.Eilat49Penicillium sp.56.2
TM9-S2Theonella sp.Eilat65Chrysosporium sp.74.0
TM43-S1Xestospongia sp.Andaman30–40Penicillium sp.17.5
TM43-S3Xestospongia sp.Andaman30–40Cladosporium halotolerans4.5
TM46-S1Thrinacophora sp.Andaman30–40Cladosporium sp.30.4
TM47-S1Chondrilla sp.Andaman30–40Cladosporium halotolerans46.9
TM116-S2Xestospongia sp.Andaman30–40Aspergillus sp.28.4
TM116-S3Xestospongia sp.Andaman30–40Hortaea sp. (yeast)9.5
TM122-S1Iotrochota sp.Andaman30–40Aspergillus sp.21.7
TM122-S2Iotrochota sp.Andaman30–40Aspergillus fumigatus29.5
TM124-S1Echinaster sepositusMed W30–40Aspergillus sp.69.0
TM125-S2Clavelina dellavalleiMed W30–40Penicillium sp.51.6
TM125-S3Clavelina dellavalleiMed W30–40Penicillium sp.50.2
TM126-S1Clayx nicaensisMed W30–40Aspergillus sp.47.0
TM133-S2Cerianthus membranaceusMed W30–40Penicillium crustosum10.6
TM138-S1Didemnum maculosumMed W30–40Purpureocillium lilacinum26.2
TM138-S3Didemnum maculosumMed W30–40Cladosporium sp.16.8
TM138-S4Didemnum maculosumMed W30–40Purpureocillium lilacinum24.6
TM2-S6Sponge on top of SpondylusMed E38Aspergillus sp.55.6
TM7-S1Siphonogorgia sp.Eilat120Penicillium sp.29.3
TM30-S1Diacarnus erythraenusEilat49Penicillium fellutanum37.1
TM220-S1Gorgonian overgrown by Antipathozoanthus sp.Eilat75Cladosporium sphaerospermum40.9
TM220-S4Gorgonian overgrown by Antipathozoanthus sp.Eilat75Penicillium sp.47.1
TM225-S2Villogorgia nozzoleaEilat68Penicillium chrysogenum9.0
TM226-S1Callyspongia sp.Eilat86Cladosporium halotolerans36.2
TM226-S2Callyspongia sp.Eilat86Penicillium chrysogenum9.7
TM230-S1Siphonogorgia sp.Eilat115Penicillium sp.55.0
TM230-S6Siphonogorgia sp.Eilat115Penicillium sp.32.5
TM242-S1Orange/beige gorgonianEilat152Penicillium chrysogenum44.0
TM53-S1Plakina sp.Andaman30–40Cladosporium sp.16.3
TM54-S1Terpios sp.Andaman30–40Aspergillus sp.40.0
TM58-S1Biemna sp.Andaman30–40Penicillium sp.30.0
TM58-S2Biemna sp.Andaman30–40Aspergillus niger46.0
TM65-S2Padina spAndaman30–40Pseudocercosporella sp.46.4
TM65-S4Padina spAndaman30–40Acremonium sp.28.3
TM75-S1Ulva sp.Andaman30–40Aspergillus sp.21.6
TM83-S1BryozoanAndaman30–40Cladosporium halotolerans15.6
TM83-S2BryozoanAndaman30–40Cladosporium halotolerans33.7
TM116-S1Xestospongia sp.Andaman30–40Aspergillus aculeolatus24.6
TM122-S3Iotrochota sp.Andaman30–40Aspergillus creber62.0
TM122-S4Iotrochota sp.Andaman30–40Obolarina sp.40.1
TM124-S4Echinaster sepositusMed W30–40Aspergillus sp.36.0
TM124-S7Echinaster sepositusMed W30–40Aspergillus sp.46.4
TM132-S1Haliclona mediterraneaMed W30–40Aspergillus sp. 24.9
TM141-S1Cliona celataMed W30–40Alternaria sp.22.3
TM141-S2Cliona celataMed W30–40Alternaria sp.16.3
TM141-S3Cliona celataMed W30–40Alternaria sp.39.8
TM148-S1Astropecten bispinosusMed W30–40Aspergillus sp. 24.9
Table 2. 2,4-DCP metabolites traced only in DCP-treated cell cultures
Table 2. 2,4-DCP metabolites traced only in DCP-treated cell cultures
A/ARt (Min)[M − H]ECMS2Found in
(1)4.90271.0480C11H13ClN2O4114.9515 (C4O2Cl), 191.0924 (C11H13O2N)Penicillium steckii TM2-S5, Chrysosporium sp. ΤΜ9-S2, Aspergillus creber TM122-S3, Aspergillus sp. TM124-S1
(2)6.98287.0429C11H13O5N2Cl-Chrysosporium sp. ΤΜ9-S2, Aspergillus sp. TM124-S1, Penicilluim sp. TM38-S1
(3)7.01125.0233C6H6O3-Penicillium steckii TM2-S5, Penicilluim sp.TM38-S1, Aspergillus creber TM122-S3, Aspergillus sp. TM124-S1
(4)8.87 415.1801C22H34Cl2O3-All
(4)9.06415.1801C22H34Cl2O3-All
(5)9.42245.9986C9H10NClO3S158.9675 (C6H4OClS)Chrysosporium sp. ΤΜ9-S2
(5)9.63245.9986C9H10NClO3S158.9675 (C6H4OClS)Chrysosporium sp. ΤΜ9-S2
(6)10.24279.9596C9H9O3NSCl2-Chrysosporium sp. ΤΜ9-S2
(6)10.42279.9596C9H9O3NSCl2-Chrysosporium sp. ΤΜ9-S2
(7)11.68142.9903C6H5ClO2114.9515 (C4O2Cl)Chrysosporium sp. ΤΜ9-S2
(8)12.33339.0033C12H14Cl2O7160.9565 (C6H3OCl2), 124.9798 (C6H2OCl)Chrysosporium sp. ΤΜ9-S2
(9)12.43206.9513C6H5O4ClS-Penicillium steckii TM2-S5, Aspergillus creber TM122-S3, Aspergillus sp. TM124-S1
(10)13.37126.9945C6H5OCl-Penicillium steckii TM2-S5, Chrysosporium sp. ΤΜ9-S2, Aspergillus creber TM122-S3
(11)13.81176.9505C6H4Cl2O2-Chrysosporium sp. ΤΜ9-S2
(11)13.94176.9505C6H4Cl2O2-Chrysosporium sp. ΤΜ9-S2
(12)15.12160.9565C6H4Cl2O124.9798 (C6H2OCl); 88.9943 (C3H2OCl)All
Rt = retention time; [M − H]= m/z of the pseudomolecular ion; EC = elemental composition; MS2 = the main MS/MS fragments for each pseudomolecular ion together with the respective EC.
Back to TopTop