Next Article in Journal
Design and Synthesis of Analogues of Marine Natural Product Galaxamide, an N-methylated Cyclic Pentapeptide, as Potential Anti-Tumor Agent in Vitro
Next Article in Special Issue
Extracellular Metabolites from Industrial Microalgae and Their Biotechnological Potential
Previous Article in Journal
A Coral-Derived Compound Improves Functional Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury through Its Antiapoptotic and Anti-Inflammatory Effects
Previous Article in Special Issue
Screening of Diatom Strains and Characterization of Cyclotella cryptica as A Potential Fucoxanthin Producer
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Antimicrobial Compounds from Eukaryotic Microalgae against Human Pathogens and Diseases in Aquaculture

FR CNRS 3473 IUML Mer-Molécules-Santé (MMS), Université du Maine, Avenue O. Messiaen, Le Mans 72085, France
Ifremer, SG2M-LGPMM, Laboratoire de Génétique et de Pathologie des Mollusques Marins, Avenue Mus de Loup, La Tremblade 17390, France
Institut des Sciences de la Mer de Rimouski, Université du Québec à Rimouski, 310 des Ursulines, Rimouski, QC G5L 3A1, Canada
UMR CNRS 6283 Institut des Molécules et Matériaux du Mans (IMMM), Université du Maine, Avenue O. Messiaen, Le Mans 72085, France
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2016, 14(9), 159;
Submission received: 12 July 2016 / Revised: 20 August 2016 / Accepted: 24 August 2016 / Published: 2 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Collection Bioactive Compounds from Marine Plankton)


The search for novel compounds of marine origin has increased in the last decades for their application in various areas such as pharmaceutical, human or animal nutrition, cosmetics or bioenergy. In this context of blue technology development, microalgae are of particular interest due to their immense biodiversity and their relatively simple growth needs. In this review, we discuss about the promising use of microalgae and microalgal compounds as sources of natural antibiotics against human pathogens but also about their potential to limit microbial infections in aquaculture. An alternative to conventional antibiotics is needed as the microbial resistance to these drugs is increasing in humans and animals. Furthermore, using natural antibiotics for livestock could meet the consumer demand to avoid chemicals in food, would support a sustainable aquaculture and present the advantage of being environmentally friendly. Using natural and renewable microalgal compounds is still in its early days, but considering the important research development and rapid improvement in culture, extraction and purification processes, the valorization of microalgae will surely extend in the future.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Microalgae are present in almost all ecosystems around the world. They evolved in extreme competitive environments, are largely grazed by highly diverse consumers and exposed to microbial pathogens such as bacteria, viruses and fungi. In order to survive, they had to develop tolerance or defense strategies. The variety of these mechanisms resulted in a high diversity of compounds synthesized from diverse metabolic pathways. It appears that many of these metabolites present very specific chemical structures that are not encountered among terrestrial organisms, and sometimes with a structural complexity that makes often too difficult to reproduce them by hemi-synthesis or complete synthesis [1].
In recent decades, there has been a great trend for research and industrial applications of marine compounds and biotechnology [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Among the large spectrum of marine organisms, microalgae represent a promising resource for blue technologies, due to their rapid growth and usually simple nutriment requirements. Furthermore, many microalgal species are able to grow in saline water or wastewater. This represents an invaluable advantage, considering that freshwater resources are becoming scarce. Microalgae are usually very versatile and able to acclimate to various and changing environments. They offer the opportunity to discover novel molecules or produce known molecules at a lower cost. Due to a tremendous phenotypic plasticity, the nature and amount of their secondary metabolites can be manipulated through control of the culture conditions. Many valuable compounds can be extracted from microalgae, including pigments, lipids, proteins, polysaccharides, vitamins or minerals [8,9,10,11]. If an important research effort in microalgal biotechnology is made to promote the production of biofuels [12,13,14], the variety of compounds generated by microalgae can serve a broad spectrum of applications such as pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, human and animal nutrition, environmental restoration and protection or bioenergy [15,16,17,18,19,20]. Several compounds have shown potent biological activities, such as antioxidants, anticoagulants, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial or antitumoral [8,9,21,22]. The possible use of these compounds as a source of prebiotics, nutraceuticals, chemopreventive agents or antimicrobial drugs was investigated and has demonstrated promising results [11,23,24,25,26]. Microalgae are also valuable for their production of a diverse range of pigments such as chlorophyll, phycobiliproteins or carotenoids that can be used as dyes for food industry or cosmetics.
The earliest and most common use of microalgae is for aquaculture. They have been used as food source and feed additive to promote the growth of the larvae or the juveniles of various aquatic animals such as finfish, shellfish or crustaceans and can be used for refining process at adult stages [27]. Microalgae can also be supplied to the zooplankton used to feed the larvae of finfish and crustaceans [28]. They are not only essential as a food source but they also permit to improve the quality of aquaculture stock. For instance, the carotenoid astaxanthin, especially abundant in the green microalga Haematococcus pluvialis, can be supplied to give or increase color to the flesh of salmon and trout [29]; the blue pigment marennine, produced by the diatom Haslea ostrearia, gives a blue-green color to the gills and labial palps of oysters, increasing their market value [30].
Other examples of the microalgae use in aquaculture are the so-called “green-water” and “pseudo green-water” techniques. The “green-water” technique refers to natural phytoplankton populations in outdoor ponds, while the “pseudo green-water” technique relates to the regular addition of selected microalgae. Both techniques allow providing favorable turbidity conditions and/or continuous nutrition to larvae or to the live food [27,31,32]. They have proven multiple benefits over the “clear water” system, for which a series of external filters allows to maintain the water quality, in terms of survival and growth of several animal species [33,34,35,36]. Indeed, “green-water” cultures can help to provide food with high nutritional value with chemical and digestive stimulants, and to improve and stabilize the quality of the culture medium [37,38]. Such culture techniques increase general health and resistance to diseases, thanks not only to a better nutrition [39], but also to the production of antimicrobial compounds by some microalgae. The “green-water” culture, and especially the “pseudo green-water” culture present many advantages as they allow direct supply of nutrients, are easy to manage, environmentally friendly and could lower the use of antibiotics in rearing systems [40].
Considering the remarkable biodiversity of microalgae and the improvement in culture, screening, extraction and purification techniques, it is likely that these microorganisms will represent an important source of new products in the future as part of blue technology. So far, bioactive compounds from cyanobacteria have been more studied than those from eukaryotic microalgae, probably due to their simpler culture methods, and have been the subject of several recent papers [41,42,43,44]. One of the major difficulties of microalgae mass culture is the bacterial contamination [45] while the culture media of cyanobacteria species studies are generally more resistant.
The present work is thus an update of previous works [1,2,23], and a complement to a recent review on freshwater microalgae [46]. It aims to present the available information about the biological activities of eukaryotic microalgae, by focusing on their (i) antibacterial; (ii) antifungal and (iii) antiviral properties, with a special interest on the activity against human pathogens and their potential application in aquaculture against various microbial diseases.

2. Antibacterial Activity from Microalgae

2.1. Antibacterial Activity from Microalgae against Human Pathogenic Bacteria

The increasing resistance of pathogenic bacteria against a significant number of antibiotics, with consequences for human health, has been a great concern for the past decades and has forced the efforts to find new antibacterial substances [6,47,48]. Some bacteria may infect and cause serious diseases in humans and some others can also provoke foodborne illness inducing moderate to severe nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Since the pioneer work of Pratt in 1944, which demonstrated the activity of the green alga Chlorella against several Gram-positive (G+) and Gram-negative (G−) bacteria [49], the interest for antibacterial compounds from microalgae has been growing. Numerous studies followed to detect compounds with antibacterial activity in microalgae, either to develop new drugs against bacterial infections, or to develop additives for food preservations.
Large screening programs have thus been conducted to assess the potential antibacterial activity of various microalgal extracts against pathogenic and foodborne bacteria. Numerous microalgal species from distinct taxonomical groups originating from various areas [50,51,52], mainly from marine environment [53,54,55,56,57,58], but also from freshwater environment [59,60], or even from the soil [61] were shown to have potent antibacterial activity against both (G+) and (G−) bacteria (Table 1). As screening studies can sometimes include hundreds of different microalgae [51,55,59], Table 1 only presents the microalgae with the highest antibacterial activity or the wider spectrum of activity from these screenings.
It appeared from these studies that the production of antibiotics is largely dependent on the microalgal species [65]. The presence of antibiotic agents can vary widely between different species from the same class, even if some studies presume that the antibacterial activity is predominantly found among the members of the classes Bacillariophyceae and Chrysophyceae [54,55]. The antibacterial activity can also differ within a same species, with ecotypes adapted to different environments [83]. Indeed, the green microalga Dunaliella sp. isolated from highly polluted waters proved to be more active against bacteria than its ecotypes isolated from less polluted waters [68].

2.1.1. Toward Improving Extraction Techniques

Beside the microalgal species, the presence of the antibacterial compounds in the microalgal extracts is also highly dependent on the solvent used during the extraction. As the biological activity is rarely found in aqueous extracts [59,79,80], it seems that compounds with an activity against foodborne and human pathogenic bacteria in microalgae are mostly hydrophobic and can be more readily extracted with organic solvents. Some authors found that antibacterial activity was generally found in methanolic extracts [50,59], while some other studies described a better extraction using acetone [79,80], benzene and ethyl acetate [65] or petroleum ether and hexane [66].
Other techniques have been tested to extract bioactive compounds from microalgae, such as supercritical CO2, pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) or subcritical water extraction (SWE). These techniques are considered as “greener” than the traditional ones as they do not need large quantities of organic solvents, allow a faster extraction and are more selective toward the compounds of interest [84]. Supercritical CO2 method allowed obtaining lipid fractions from Chaetoceros muelleri with antibacterial activity against Staphyloccocus aureus and Escherichia coli [75], while a classic extraction with solvents such as hexane, dichloromethane and methanol did not demonstrate any activity against E. coli [74]. PLE and SWE permitted to extract antimicrobial agents from H. pluvialis in the red phase with good efficiency [66,69,70]. SWE presents the advantage of not requiring the use of toxic solvents, and low temperatures such as 50 °C can allow a good extraction. SWE could therefore represent an interesting green technique to obtain extracts for natural ingredients, and particularly for the food industry.

2.1.2. Diversity of Antibacterial Compounds Extracted from Microalgae

In some studies, the antibacterial compounds present in the organic extracts were characterized. These bioactive compounds can be pigments, such as phycobiliproteins [72] or chlorophyll derivatives [82,85], but they are most of the time free fatty acids. Short chain fatty acids from H. pluvialis [69,70] and long chain fatty acids from Scenedesmus obliquus [71] present antibacterial activity against E. coli and S. aureus. The polyunsaturated fatty acids from Chlorococcum strain HS-101 and Dunaliella primolecta demonstrated antibacterial activity against the methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), a bacterium causing infections that kill thousands of people per year and which can be highly resistant to conventional antibiotics [64]. Desbois et al. also found fatty acids from the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum with a very potent antibacterial activity against the MRSA and have characterized three different unsaturated fatty acids involved in the antibacterial activity: the polyunsaturated fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), the monounsaturated fatty acid palmitoleic acid (PA) and the relatively unusual polyunsaturated fatty acid hexadecatrienoic acid (HTA) [77,78]. It has also been observed that the fusiform morphotype of this diatom produced greater levels of EPA, PA and HTA compared to its oval morphotype [86].
In natural environments, fatty acids are released when the microalgal cell loses its integrity and they seem to be involved in an “activated” defense mechanism to protect an algal population against grazing predators [87] and when pathogenic bacteria are around the algae [26]. Moreover, it has previously been shown that fatty acids possess bactericidal properties against a diverse range of bacteria [88]. The exact mechanism of the antibacterial activity of the bioactive compounds is not yet fully elucidated, but it seems that bacterial cellular membranes would be the main site of action [89]. There is some evidence of deleterious effects of fatty acids in the bacterial membrane, causing a cell leakage, a reduction of the nutrient intake and a reduction of the cellular respiration [26]. The antibacterial action of fatty acids may also be mediated by the inhibition of bacterial fatty acid synthesis [87].
These mechanisms could explain why (G+) bacteria are more susceptible to microalgae bioactive compounds than (G−) bacteria. In fact, the bacterial growth inhibition is generally lower when microalgae are tested against (G−) bacteria, and in some cases the tested extracts do not present any bactericidal effect. As examples, the phycobiliproteins and exopolysaccharides from the red microalgae Porphyridium aerugineum and Rhodella reticulata respectively, were active against the (G+) bacteria S. aureus and Streptoccocus pyogenes but presented no effect against the (G−) bacteria E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [72]. The diatom P. tricornutum did not demonstrate antibacterial effect against these two (G−) bacteria either, whereas a good antibacterial activity against the (G+) MRSA was observed [78]. Thus, the difference in sensitivities between bacteria may be due to their complex membrane permeability, making the penetration and the bactericidal action of the compound more difficult.
The potent activity of microalgal compounds, especially free fatty acids, against various bacteria straightens further development in the search for drugs and food preservatives from microalgae. Bacterial resistance to free fatty acids has not been encountered yet [90,91], so their exploitation in medicine deserves to be further investigated [78]. Furthermore, as consumers tend to avoid synthetic additives, microalgae could be good candidates as natural sources against food-borne pathogens.

2.2. Use of Microalgae against Pathogenic Bacteria in Aquaculture

Bacteria are nowadays considered as main causes of infections in intensive aquaculture of finfish and shellfish worldwide [92], occurring as well in hatcheries and nurseries as in rear and grow-out ponds. These infections can lead to serious mass mortalities and imply considerable economic losses. A wide range of bacteria are known to infect farmed and wild species with minor to severe consequences on health and survival. Among the important bacterial diseases in finfish we can cite those caused by Aeromonas sp. and Pseudomonas sp., inducing hemorrhages in many fresh-water species, or Vibrio sp. inducing vibrioses in marine fish species [93]. Vibrio are able to infect a wide variety of hosts [94] and are also the most common and harmful shrimp pathogenic bacteria [95], with luminous species such as Vibrio harveyi involved in mass mortalities in shrimp hatcheries [96]. Vibrio sp. have also been demonstrated to be involved in a large number of massive mortalities in bivalve hatcheries [97,98,99,100,101].
Antibiotics have been largely used in intensive aquaculture, as well for finfish [102,103], shrimp [104,105,106,107] or shellfish cultures [108,109]. However, as for humans and terrestrial animals, bacterial resistance in aquaculture is increasing and most antibiotics are less effective [110,111,112]. The presence of drug residues in tissues of aquatic animals and the risk of transferring resistant bacteria to humans have led to a great concern about the use of antibiotics for public health [113]. A few antibiotics are now licensed in aquaculture due to the establishment of strict regulations by the European Conformity (EC) or the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), such as the regulation (EC) No 470/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council of 6 May 2009 laying down Community procedures for the establishment of residue limits of pharmacologically active substances in foodstuffs of animal origin. Various alternative and natural compounds are available today to control aquatic pathogenic bacteria, mainly derived from plants. They present the advantages of decreasing the side effects observed with synthetic antibiotics, being less expensive [114]. In this context, several microalgae species have been investigated for their antibacterial activity in vitro, and in co-culture with pathogenic bacteria, and some studies have also been conducted in vivo with the “green water” technique and using microalgae as food supplements (Table 2).

2.2.1. Benefits of the “Green-Water” Technique against Bacterial Diseases in Aquaculture

The “green water” technique has demonstrated beneficial effects on health, survival rates and resistance of different organisms [32,33,34,35,36,37,39]. Addition of the microalga Isochrysis galbana allowed a better viability and a faster grow of the turbot Scophthalmus maximus larvae as well as a lower proliferation of opportunistic bacteria [133]. The green microalga Tetraselmis suecica first showed good antibacterial activity in vitro against several Vibrio species [122] and then proved to reduce in vivo the number of various bacterial species in the water tank of the Atlantic salmon Salmo salar [123]. Adding T. suecica also reduced the number of Vibrio species in broodstock gut, eggs and larvae of the white prawn Fenneropenaeus indicus, resulting in improved egg hatching and larval survival [132]. A better survival and physiological conditions of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis larvae and the scallop Placopecten magellanicus larvae were observed when incubated with supernatant containing marennine, the extracellular blue pigment of the diatom H. ostrearia, at concentrations as low as 0.1 mg/L [130]. The use of the diatoms Skeletonema costatum and Chaetoceros calcitrans to feed Penaeus monodon larvae allowed a growth inhibition of the luminous bacteria Vibrio harveyi [134]. However, this seemed mainly due to the microbial flora associated with the diatoms rather than their metabolic products. Indeed, the effectiveness of the “green water” culture in preventing bacterial infections and outbreaks can also be attributed to the presence of antibacterial factors in the bacterial, fungal and phytoplankton microbiota associated with this culture technique [124].
Yet, several co-culture experiments with axenic microalgae demonstrated the ability of some species to produce and release compounds with potent activity against pathogenic bacteria. Axenic cultures of Chlorella minutissima, Tetraselmis chui, Isochrysis sp. and Nannochloropsis sp. limited the growth of various Vibrio species [125], and growth of the luminous bacteria V. harveyi highly decreased when co-cultured with pure Chlorella sp. [40], C. calcitrans or Nitzschia sp. [124].
Finally, genetically modified microalgae were also used in vivo. In a recent study, better growth, resistance to bacteria and survival rate were observed in the shrimp postlarvae P. monodon fed with “fusant” Chlorella and Dunaliella [135]. The so-called “fusant” microalgae resulted from the generation of a unique cell through somatic hybridization by fusion of the two protoplasts. This fusion technology is especially used to transfer agronomically useful traits to plants [136] and would allow an improvement of valuable metabolites production from these two microalgae. Another genetically modified microalga tested in “green water” systems is the transgenic line of Nannochloropsis oculata, able to produce the bovine antimicrobial lactoferricin (LFB) peptide. These LFB-containing transgenic microalgae were developed and tested as food supplement for the medaka fish Oryzias latipes infected with Vibrio parahaemolyticus, which displayed a significantly better survival rate after 24 h [137].

2.2.2. Microalgae to Improve the Live-Food Quality

Microalgae also show advantages for the live-food quality [39,138], by reducing the number of associated pathogenic bacteria such as Vibrio and allowing a lower risk of transmission to fish larvae. Daily addition of Dunaliella tertiolecta to feed the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana, considered as an essential part of the live food chain for the culture of fish, conferred a full protection against Vibrio campbellii and Vibrio proteolyticus [39]. A 4 h incubation of A. franciscana with the microalgae Tetraselmis sp. resulted in a diminution by 75% of associated bacteria, with a better bacterial diversity and the flora less dominated by Vibrio alginolyticus [131]. Similar observations were made by Makridis et al. with incubation of Artemia with T. chui and C. minutissima [129]. These authors proposed that the reduction of Vibrio cells in Artemia cultures could either be due to compounds released by microalgae or to (G+) associated bacteria.

2.2.3. In Vitro Efficiency of Microalgal Compounds against Marine Bacteria

Several in vitro studies demonstrated the ability of various microalgae to produce antibacterial compounds effective against relevant marine pathogenic bacteria. The whole cells of Chaetoceros lauderi [58], supernatant and homogenates of T. suecica [122,123] or homogenates from Stichochrysis immobilis [121] induced a growth inhibition of various marine bacteria. However, Berland et al. noted that limited attention should be paid to antibacterial activity obtained with broken cells, as in natural conditions substances synthesized have to be released into the water to target another organism [121]. Microalgae producing antibacterial compounds that are not released in the medium cannot indeed be considered gainful in “green water” techniques, but these compounds can be highly useful in the design of novel drugs.
Only a few compounds with activity against marine bacteria have been characterized, such as the polyunsaturated free fatty acid in P. tricornutum, identified as eicosapentaenoic acid [78]. An antibacterial activity was also demonstrated in vitro with the blue pigment of the two diatoms H. ostrearia and Haslea karadagensis. These blue pigments can be observed in the apex of the microalgae (intracellular form) but can also be released in the medium (extracellular form). The purified forms of these pigments [139] have been shown to inhibit the growth of several marine bacteria including Vibrio such bacteria belonging to Vibrio splendidus clade or Vibrio aestuarianus species [30,117,118,119], involved in oysters mass mortality [140,141,142].
A series of experiments were conducted to assess the spectrum of activity of purified extracellular marennine, the pigment produced by H. ostrearia, against pathogenic Vibrio species. The growth of V. splendidus-related strain (Vibrio tasmaniensis LGP32 (CIP107715)) was slowed down when exposed to a concentration of marennine up to 10 μg per mL and seemed totally inhibited with a concentration of 1 mg per mL (Figure 1).
In another series of experiments, a comparative approach combining several species and strains was chosen to reflect the diversity of strains within species. The sensitivity of various strains recognized for their virulence, of V. aestuarianus [143], Vibrio coralliilyticus [144] and Vibrio tubiashii [145] to extracellular marennine purified as previously described [139] was assessed by exposing the bacteria to marennine concentration ranging from 1 to 100 μg per mL. For all the three species, after 48 h, the higher the marennine concentration, the higher was the bacterial growth inhibition (data not shown), confirming the antibacterial activity of the pigment produced by the diatom H. ostrearia. Moreover, when comparing different ecotypes within a same Vibrio species, the sensitivity of the strains exposed to marennine could be significantly different (Figure 2). It can be noted that the strains coming from collections, used to describe the species and often isolated besides mortality events, seemed more sensitive to marennine comparing to virulent strains. Complementary experiments are under way in order to confirm and precise the biological effect of marennine on these Vibrio species and to highlight the variability in sensitivity of different strains within a same species.

2.2.4. Interactions between Microalgae and Marine Bacteria

The antibacterial mechanisms of action of microalgae are still unclear and the bioactive compounds released by the cells could either be bactericidal or prevent the bacterial multiplication. The very rapid growth inhibition of various Vibrio species in co-culture with Chlorella sp., Isochrysis sp. or Nannochloropsis sp. with no recovery after few days [40,125] allows considering a bactericidal action of the extracellular substances produce by some microalgae [126]. Austin et al. also observed a prompt inhibition of several Vibrio species by T. suecica in vitro and noticed a very rapid decrease in bacterial mobility with an elongation and vacuolisation of the cells in less than 20 min. Though, a reduction of the inhibitory activity was observed after only 5 h. It was suggested that the bioactive substance could have been denatured or adsorbed by some bacterial cells, allowing others to grow [122,123].
In some cases, the antibacterial activity of microalgae can be induced by the presence of bacteria in the vicinity of the microalgae, or can be constitutive and always present in the algal culture medium [61]. The constitutive production of antibacterial exometabolites by some microalgae was highlighted with the growth diminution of Listeria monocytogenes in co-culture with the cell-free culture media of S. costatum [127].
Microalgae can influence marine bacteria in different ways. They can either inhibit or stimulate bacterial growth, or have no apparent effect, depending on the target bacteria [121,128]. As an example, the diatom S. costatum inhibits the growth of Pseudomonas and Vibrio in co-culture, but enhances the growth of Flavobacterium [128]. The production of antibacterial compounds by microalgae such as lipids or fatty acids varies according to the taxonomic group, the growth conditions, the available nutrients and their concentration in the medium, the light intensity, the temperature or the pH. The development stage of the algal culture is also highly significant as it is assumed that various secondary metabolites are produced and released in the medium at different growth phases [1]. Terekhova et al. showed that only the exometabolites produced by S. costatum during the middle steady-state growth phase presented an antibacterial activity against L. monocytogenes while compounds released during the exponential growth phase had no effect on these bacteria [127]. Cooper et al. have also demonstrated the direct relation between cell growth phase and antibacterial activity, and showed that P. tricornutum presented a better activity against a wide spectrum of marine bacteria during the exponential growth phase compared to the stationary phase, while the reverse relationship was found for S. costatum [81].

3. Antifungal Activity from Microalgae

3.1. Antifungal Activity from Microalgae against Human Pathogens

The search for antifungal compounds from microalgae started much later than screening for antibacterial activity. As a matter of fact, fungi have been considered as harmful human pathogens since the 1970s, when mortality induced by fungal infections and the frequency of nosocomial mycoses increased in hospitalized patients. Increase of fungal infections was mainly due to therapies that depress patients’ immune system such as the use of intensive and aggressive chemotherapy regimens, the expansion of organ transplant programs and the spread of the AIDS epidemic. [146,147]. The incidence of invasive aspergillosis (induced by Aspergillus species), and the number of cases of candidemia (an infection and a disease caused by Candida species), have been rising inexorably from that time [148,149]. The growing use of antifungal agents in recent years has led to the development of drug resistance [150,151]. Thus, there is a need for novel drugs and several studies were recently conducted to find fungicide activity from natural marine products against human pathogenic fungi [152,153,154,155,156,157], including antifungal agents from microalgae (Table 3).
There are fewer screening activities for microalgal fungicides than for bactericides, and most of the studies focus not only on the antifungal activity but also on antibacterial activities [50,51,58,60,63,65,72,80,117,158,159]. As for antibacterial activity, antifungal activity varies widely depending on microalgal species, type of solvent used to extract the compound and the microorganism tested. It does not seem to be a taxonomic trend for the antifungal activity, and the capability to produce antifungal compounds would have evolved independently of phylogenetic relationship in microalgae [50]. However, Pesando et al. noticed a significant activity of the genus Chaetoceros [160] and Kellam et al. also indicated that marine microalgae showed more potential in the search for new antifungal agents than freshwater species [161].
As illustrated in Table 3, several antifungal compounds from various microalgae have been characterized. Polysaccharides with high molecular weight were identified in the diatom C. lauderi. They presented a large spectrum of activity against dermatophytes, moulds and phyto-fungi, but no activity was detected against the yeasts tested [58,162,163]. Gambieric acids from the dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus toxicus also had an antifungal activity against several dermatophytes and moulds but showed no activity against yeasts like Candida albicans or Saccharomyces cerevisiae [165]. The diatom Thalassiothrix frauenfeldii was meanwhile active against yeasts and moulds but not against dermathophytes [80]. Other compounds such as pigments like beta-carotene, chlorophyll-a and chlorophyll-b from Chlorococcum humicola [65], or phycobiliproteins from Porphyridium aerugineum have also demonstrated antifungal activities [72]. The polyene-polyhydroxy metabolites amphidinols were extracted from the dinoflagellate Amphidinium klebsii [168,169]. Polyenes are metabolites known for having a potent antifungal activity as they target the biosynthetic pathway of ergosterols, found in fungi membranes [150]. These few results illustrate that the search for novel antifungal compounds from microalgae has not been greatly developed so far, although an increasing number of fungi display drug resistance phenomenon.

3.2. Potential Use of Microalgae against Fungal Diseases in Aquaculture

An increase in fungal infections has been observed in the last few decades with the modernization and intensification of aquaculture at an industrial scale, resulting in huge losses for aquaculture industries. Fungal infections in aquaculture may cause severe diseases and mortality events leading to economic losses. They are often considered secondary to other factors or pathogens such as consequences of water quality problems, fish trauma by rough handling or temperature shock, bacterial diseases or parasites [170]. Several fungi are known to induce diseases by developing in the skin and the gills of the infected fish or in eggs, or by producing toxins [171]. Indeed, mycotoxins can provoke many disorders and can accumulate in fish tissues, representing a risk for public health [172].
Chemicals used to treat infected animals are limited and, due to the increasing resistance of fungi against conventional drugs, environmental legislations and consumer's safety, the alternative “herbal formulations” and alternative safe and cheap methods have become of renewed interest [173]. Studies have been conducted in order to find new antimycotics of natural origin such as plant extracts [174,175,176] or essential oils [177,178], which should have no harmful effect on fish, fish eggs, human health and ecosystems.
So far, very few studies have been conducted to assess the antifungal activity from microalgae against pathogenic fungi in aquaculture systems (Table 3). Gastineau et al. have demonstrated in vitro the antifungal activity of the pigment produced by the diatom H. karadagensis against three marine fungal species Corollospora maritima, Dendryphiella salina, Lulworthia sp., which can be involved in the phenomenon of biofouling [117]. Organic extracts of the green microalgae Chlorella pyrenoidosa and Scenedesmus quadricauda have demonstrated antifungal activity against Fusarium monofiliform [63] reported of causing black gill disease in shrimps [179]. This result is of great interest as Fusarium sp. were recently shown to produce toxins that accumulate in fish [180]. Aspergillus fumigatus is also a fungus susceptible to produce toxins and it thus represents a potential contaminant for seafood, particularly for marine bivalves [181]. It can be inhibited by compounds produced by C. lauderi [58], G. toxicus [165], and Chlorella vulgaris [62].
More generally, fungi from the taxa Fusarium and Aspergillus are found in many countries in water, sediments and marine invertebrates, and their presence in shellfish farming areas evidences the necessity to pay attention to shellfish contamination by such fungi [182]. Furthermore, reports of fungi causing deleterious effects are frequently related [183,184], which encourage a larger screening of microalgae for the production of novel antifungal compounds.

4. Antiviral Activity from Microalgae

4.1. Antiviral Activity from Microalgae against Pathogenic Human Viruses

Viral pathogens are the leading cause of human diseases and mortality worldwide. Treatments to block the entry of the virus or its replication directly are difficult to design, as they can have adverse effects on the infected host cells [185]. Thus, treatments against diseases caused by viruses are limited, and resistance to these available treatments demonstrate the need for new medicines [186]. Many drugs exhibiting selective inhibition of mammalian originate from synthetic organic chemicals or from natural products, for instance secondary metabolites in plants [185]. Along with the development of “blue” technology and extraction improvement, there is a growing interest in marine-derived antiviral compounds. Thus, thousands of compounds from various marine organisms such as algae, bacteria, fungi, marine invertebrates or sponges have been screened [153,186,187,188] and some of them have demonstrated antiviral activities and are commercially available.
Potential antiviral activity from algal compounds has been first demonstrated in the 1950s by Gerber et al. who observed that the polysaccharides extracted from Gelidium cartilagenium afforded protection for embryonated eggs against influenza B and mumps viruses [189], and the first brood-based studies of seaweeds for their antiviral substances started in the 1970s [190]. Screenings for antiviral compounds from macroalgae are still predominant [191,192,193,194,195], but the interest for antiviral compounds from microalgae and cyanobacteria rapidly increased as they also present relevant antiviral activities and are easier to culture. Cyanobacteria are promising sources of antiviral compounds, and their simple growth needs make them good candidates for the production of antiviral agents at an industrial scale [44,196]. The sulphated polysaccharide isolated from the cyanobacteria Spirulina platensis, named spirulan, has demonstrated potent antiviral activity against the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and also against the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) [197]. A spirulan-like molecule isolated from Arthrospira platensis has also been indicated to possess antiviral activities against these two viruses, with absence of cytotoxic effects [198].
Several studies have been conducted to test microalgae compounds against pathogenic human viruses (Table 4). Antiviral compounds extracted from microalgae are mainly polysaccharides. Their mechanisms of action against viruses are not fully understood but it seems that they can inhibit different stages of the viral infection, such as the adhesion, the penetration or the replication. Polysaccharides have gained interest in the biomedical and pharmaceutical industries as they are easily available in nature and most of them are nontoxic, safe, biodegradable and biocompatible [199]. However, numerous polysaccharides with antiviral activities were not developed for clinical use. The reasons are probably the very high molecular weights of some polysaccharides, preventing them to pass through the different barriers of the body and the incapacity of enzymes to digest these large and complex molecules, leading to their accumulation in the body and to potential cytotoxic effects [200].
Some sulphated polysaccharides present a broad antiviral spectrum against enveloped viruses. Naviculan, extracted from the diatom Navicula directa, or A1 and A2 extracted from Cochlodinium polykrikoides demonstrated to potent antiviral activity against several enveloped viruses such as HIV-1, HSV-1 or influenza virus type A (IFV-A) [210,211]. The sulphated polysaccharide p-KG03 extracted from Gyrodinium impudicum did not demonstrate antiviral activity against HSV-1 and HSV-2, but presented a good activity against the encephalomyocarditis RNA virus (EMCV) [211], and against several strains of influenza viruses with efficiency comparable to some existing drugs [212]. Antiviral activities of microalgae against HSV type 1 and 2 are the most studied [117,118,200,201,202,203,206,208,209,210]. More than one third of the world population is affected by HSV-1 or HSV-2, infections that cause contagious diseases such as oral and genital herpes [187]. The efficiency and the low toxicity of some of the microalgal compounds tested attest their advantageous use as antiviral agents. They could help to control viral diseases occurring in humans, but also in animal species with economic value.

4.2. Potential Use of Microalgae against Viruses in Aquaculture

Aquaculture production undergoes numerous viral diseases, which can affect organism health and survival rates, and can sometimes lead to mass mortality. Viral diseases are spreading and are consequently important limiting factors for the expansion of aquaculture. Many different viruses, from various virus families, are known to infect farmed species, such as finfish, crustaceans or molluscs [213,214,215]. As a few relevant examples, we can cite the infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV), isolated from a very wide host range among finfish [215], the yellow head virus (YHV) and the white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) causing important losses in shrimp culture, or the ostreid herpesvirus-1 (OsHV-1) leading to high mortality in marine bivalves [216] and which can be transmitted between different bivalve species [217]. It appears that diseases induced by RNA viruses are the highest cause of ecological and socio-economic impacts in European farmed finfish [218]. Viruses in aquaculture species are either established for decades or are newly emerging because of the intensification of farming practices that facilitates rapid transmission of diseases.
Viral diseases in aquaculture are challenging to manage. They are difficult to treat directly and a few, if any, efficacious treatments are available other than destroying all organisms in infected farms and avoiding their movements to and from infected areas. In some particular cases, vaccination is used in farmed finfish, mainly to treat trout and salmon [218,219]. The vaccination issue did not arise in invertebrates, as it was widely assumed that, unlike vertebrates, they do not possess the capacity to develop long-term acquired immunity. Nevertheless, there are evidences for specific immune memory in some invertebrates [220] such as crustaceans [221], and several studies have demonstrated the antiviral protection of shrimp by “vaccination” [222,223]. A recent work has also demonstrated the presence of an antiviral system in oysters after injection of a synthetic viral analogue (Poly I:C) against OsHV-1. This immune response showed similarity with the vertebrate interferon response pathway [224]. The lack of marine mollusc cell culture not only restricts virus isolation capacities and subsequent characterization work, but also limits investigations on host-virus interaction. However, recent progress has been made with the development of stem cells in the cupped oysters Crassostrea gigas [225].
Plant and herbal extracts with activity against viral diseases in aquaculture production have recently been reviewed by Sivasankar et al. [226]. Some extracts have already been successfully tested in vivo, such as the plant extract of Cyanodon dactylon against the WSS virus of the shrimp P. monodon [227]. Plant extracts, acting as immunostimulants, have the advantage of being easily delivered by oral administration and may be eco-friendly as they are biodegradable.
In contrast, very few studies have been conducted to assess the antiviral activity of microalgae against viruses in aquaculture. Some polysaccharide extracts of various microalgae have been tested against the viral hemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV) [228], a virus of economic importance afflicting over 50 species of fresh water and marine fish including salmonid fish [215]. Endocellular extracts of Porphyridium cruentum, D. tertiolecta, Ellipsoidon sp., Isochrysis galbana var. Tiso and Chlorella autotrophica inhibited the viral infection of VHSV in vitro in epithelioma papulosum cyprinid (EPC) cells. Concentrations lower than 2 μg of extracts per mL of P. cruentum and D. tertiolecta were sufficient to detect an antiviral activity. Exocellular extracts of these algal species were also able to inhibit the viral infection, except for I. galbana var. Tiso. This study has also demonstrated that there is no correlation between the content of sulphated polysaccharides of each microalga and its capacity to inhibit the viral replication. Thus, the observed antiviral effects would be due to different polysaccharide molecular species with differences in molecular size.
A higher resistance to the WSSV was observed in the tiger shrimp P. menodon reared in a “green water” system using commercially available extracts of Dunaliella salina [35]. Culture bath treatments with the microalga C. minutissima significantly reduced the mortality of Epinephelus marginatus showing signs of Viral Encephalopathy and Retinopathy (VER) [229]. These results indicate that the control of the disease is probably due to the antiviral effect of C. minutissima cultures, which thus needs to be further investigated using in vitro testing of water-soluble algal extracts.
Viral diseases are increasingly spreading, causing great economic losses for aquaculture industries. No effective treatment has yet been developed, as vaccination possibility is limited and chemical drugs are gradually avoided because of their toxicity and potential residue accumulation. Plant and herbal extracts have shown potent antiviral activity against several pathogenic viruses in aquaculture. They could be promising candidates for antiviral agents as part of an environmentally friendly and sustainable aquaculture, although their production and delivery processes could be limiting factors. In this context, the use of microalgae as a source of antiviral agents should be further studied, as water-soluble compounds present in algal supernatants could be a valuable alternative.

5. Conclusions and Final Remarks

The diversity of microalgae is immense, with species, genera or even classes being discovered every year. On the estimated millions of existing species, about 30,000 have been described, but only a dozen are cultivated in a large scale for biotechnological applications. The main obstacle for their commercial exploitation remains the production cost, but it should be bypassed by the optimization of mass culturing conditions. Microalgae are promising source of high-value products, and their application as antimicrobials is only in its onset. The development of novel drugs with no microbial resistance and the use of environmentally friendly antibiotics in a context of sustainable aquaculture are needed. The efficiency of various microalgal compounds against human or aquatic pathogens is very encouraging and there is no doubt that their exploitation and application will expand.


The authors acknowledge H.T. Badawy for her help with Vibrio splendidus experiments, the Region Pays de la Loire and Le Mans Centre for Technology Transfer for facilities. This publication benefited from funding from the European Commission under the Community’s Seventh Framework Program BIOVADIA (contract No. FP7-PEOPLE-2010-IRSES-269294, Biodiversity and Valorisation of Blue Diatoms).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Borowitzka, M.A. Microalgae as sources of pharmaceuticals and other biologically active compounds. J. Appl. Phycol. 1995, 7, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bhatnagar, I.; Kim, S.-K. Immense essence of excellence: Marine microbial bioactive compounds. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 2673–2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dyshlovoy, S.A.; Honecker, F. Marine compounds and cancer: Where do we stand? Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 5657–5665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jha, R.K.; Zi-rong, Xu. Biomedical compounds from marine organisms. Mar. Drugs 2004, 2, 123–146. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kang, H.K.; Seo, C.H.; Park, Y. Marine peptides and their anti-infective activities. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 618–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mayer, A.M.S.; Rodríguez, A.D.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O.; Fusetani, N. Marine Pharmacology in 2009–2011: Marine compounds with antibacterial, antidiabetic, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antiprotozoal, antituberculosis, and antiviral activities; affecting the immune and nervous systems, and other miscellaneous mechanisms of action. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 2510–2573. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Suleria, H.A.R.; Osborne, S.; Masci, P.; Gobe, G. Marine-based nutraceuticals: An innovative trend in the food and supplement industries. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 6336–6351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Encarnacao, T.; Pais, A.A.; Campos, M.G.; Burrows, H.D. Cyanobacteria and microalgae: A renewable source of bioactive compounds and other chemicals. Sci. Prog. 2015, 98, 145–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Singh, S.; Kate, B.N.; Banerjee, U.C. Bioactive compounds from cyanobacteria and microalgae: An overview. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2005, 25, 73–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Shimizu, Y. Microalgal metabolites. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2003, 6, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Talero, E.; García-Mauriño, S.; Ávila-Román, J.; Rodríguez-Luna, A.; Alcaide, A.; Motilva, V. Bioactive compounds isolated from microalgae in chronic inflammation and cancer. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 6152–6209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ahmad, A.L.; Yasin, N.H.M.; Derek, C.J.C.; Lim, J.K. Microalgae as a sustainable energy source for biodiesel production: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 584–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ghasemi, Y.; Rasoul-Amini, S.; Naseri, A.T.; Montazeri-Najafabady, N.; Mobasher, M.A.; Dabbagh, F. Microalgae biofuel potentials (Review). Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2012, 48, 126–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Halim, R.; Danquah, M.K.; Webley, P.A. Extraction of oil from microalgae for biodiesel production: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 709–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Barra, L.; Chandrasekaran, R.; Corato, F.; Brunet, C. The challenge of ecophysiological biodiversity for biotechnological applications of marine microalgae. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 1641–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cadoret, J.-P.; Garnier, M.; Saint-Jean, B. Microalgae, functional genomics and biotechnology. Adv. Bot. Res. 2012, 64, 285–341. [Google Scholar]
  17. Priyadarshani, I.; Biswajit, R. Commercial and industrial applications of micro algae—A review. J. Algal Biomass Utln. 2012, 3, 89–100. [Google Scholar]
  18. De Jesus Raposo, M.F.; de Morais, R.M.S.C.; de Morais, A.M.M.B. Health applications of bioactive compounds from marine microalgae. Life Sci. 2013, 93, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Spolaore, P.; Joannis-Cassan, C.; Duran, E.; Isambert, A. Commercial applications of microalgae. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2006, 101, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Yaakob, Z.; Ali, E.; Zainal, A.; Mohamad, M.; Takriff, M.S. An overview: Biomolecules from microalgae for animal feed and aquaculture. J. Biol. Res. 2014, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. De Jesus Raposo, M.F.; de Morais, R.M.S.C.; Bernardo de Morais, A.M.M. Bioactivity and applications of sulphated polysaccharides from marine microalgae. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 233–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. De Jesus Raposo, M.F.; de Morais, A.M.B.; de Morais, R.M.S.C. Marine polysaccharides from algae with potential biomedical applications. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 2967–3028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Amaro, H.M.; Guedes, A.C.; Malcata, F.X. Chapter: Antimicrobial activities of microalgae: An invited review. In Science against Microbial Pathogens: Communicating Current Research and Technological Advances; Formatex Microbiology Book Series; Mendez-Vilas, A., Ed.; Formatex Research Center: Badajoz, Spain, 2011; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  24. De Jesus Raposo, M.F.; de Morais, A.M.M.B.; de Morais, R.M.S.C. Emergent sources of prebiotics: Seaweeds and microalgae. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. De Jesus Raposo, M.F.; de Morais, A.M.M.B.; de Morais, R.M.S.C. Carotenoids from marine microalgae: A valuable natural source for the prevention of chronic diseases. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 5128–5155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Smith, V.J.; Desbois, A.P.; Dyrynda, E.A. Conventional and unconventional antimicrobials from fish, marine invertebrates and micro-algae. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 1213–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Muller-Feuga, A. The role of microalgae in aquaculture: Situation and trends. J. Appl. Phycol. 2000, 12, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Borowitzka, M.A. Microalgae for aquaculture: Opportunities and constraints. J. Appl. Phycol. 1997, 9, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lorenz, R.T.; Cysewski, G.R. Commercial potential for Haematococcus microalgae as a natural source of astaxanthin. Trends Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gastineau, R.; Turcotte, F.; Pouvreau, J.-B.; Morançais, M.; Fleurence, J.; Windarto, E.; Prasetiya, F.S.; Arsad, S.; Jaouen, P.; Babin, M.; et al. Marennine, promising blue pigments from a widespread Haslea diatom species complex. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 3161–3189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Neori, A. “Green water” microalgae: The leading sector in world aquaculture. J. Appl. Phycol. 2010, 23, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Papandroulakis, N.; Divanach, P.; Anastasiadis, P.; Kentouri, M. The pseudo-green water technique for intensive rearing of sea bream (Sparus aurata) larvae. Aquac. Int. 2001, 9, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Naas, K.E.; N˦ss, T.; Harboe, T. Enhanced first feeding of halibut larvae (Hippoglossus hippoglossus L.) in green water. Aquaculture 1992, 105, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Reitan, K.I.; Rainuzzo, J.R.; Øie, G.; Olsen, Y. A review of the nutritional effects of algae in marine fish larvae. Aquaculture 1997, 155, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Supamattaya, K.; Kiriratnikom, S.; Boonyaratpalin, M.; Borowitzka, L. Effect of a Dunaliella extract on growth performance, health condition, immune response and disease resistance in black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon). Aquaculture 2005, 248, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Van der Meeren, T.; Mangor-Jensen, A.; Pickova, J. The effect of green water and light intensity on survival, growth and lipid composition in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) during intensive larval rearing. Aquaculture 2007, 265, 206–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cahu, C.L.; Zambonino Infante, J.L.; Péres, A.; Quazuguel, P.; Le Gall, M.M. Algal addition in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) larvae rearing: Effect on digestive enzymes. Aquaculture 1998, 161, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Palmer, P.J.; Burke, M.J.; Palmer, C.J.; Burke, J.B. Developments in controlled green-water larval culture technologies for estuarine fishes in Queensland, Australia and elsewhere. Aquaculture 2007, 272, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Marques, A.; Thanh, T.H.; Sorgeloos, P.; Bossier, P. Use of microalgae and bacteria to enhance protection of gnotobiotic Artemia against different pathogens. Aquaculture 2006, 258, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tendencia, E.A.; dela Peña, M. Investigation of some components of the greenwater system which makes it effective in the initial control of luminous bacteria. Aquaculture 2003, 218, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Burja, A.M.; Banaigs, B.; Abou-Mansour, E.; Grant Burgess, J.; Wright, P.C. Marine cyanobacteria—A prolific source of natural products. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9347–9377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Costa, M.; Costa-Rodrigues, J.; Fernandes, M.H.; Barros, P.; Vasconcelos, V.; Martins, R. Marine cyanobacteria compounds with anticancer properties: A review on the implication of apoptosis. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 2181–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gupta, V.; Ratha, S.K.; Sood, A.; Chaudhary, V.; Prasanna, R. New insights into the biodiversity and applications of cyanobacteria (blue-green algae)—Prospects and challenges. Algal Res. 2013, 2, 79–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vijayakumar, S.; Menakha, M. Pharmaceutical applications of cyanobacteria—A review. J. Acute Med. 2015, 5, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Deschênes, J.-S.; Boudreau, A.; Tremblay, R. Mixotrophic production of microalgae in pilot-scale photobioreactors: Practicability and process considerations. Algal Res. 2015, 10, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pradhan, J.; Das, S.; Das, B.K. Antibacterial activity of freshwater microalgae: A review. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2014, 8, 809–818. [Google Scholar]
  47. Jin, L.; Quan, C.; Hou, X.; Fan, S. Potential Pharmacological Resources: Natural Bioactive Compounds from Marine-Derived Fungi. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Shannon, E.; Abu-Ghannam, N. Antibacterial Derivatives of Marine Algae: An Overview of Pharmacological Mechanisms and Applications. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Pratt, R.; Daniels, T.C.; Eiler, J.J.; Gunnison, J.B.; Kumler, W.D.; Oneto, J.F.; Strait, L.A.; Spoehr, H.A.; Hardin, G.J.; Milner, H.W.; et al. Chlorellin, an antibacterial substance from Chlorella. Science 1944, 99, 351–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Mudimu, O.; Rybalka, N.; Bauersachs, T.; Born, J.; Friedl, T.; Schulz, R. Biotechnological screening of microalgal and cyanobacterial strains for biogas production and antibacterial and antifungal effects. Metabolites 2014, 4, 373–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ördög, V.; Stirk, W.A.; Lenobel, R.; Bancířová, M.; Strnad, M.; van Staden, J.; Szigeti, J.; Németh, L. Screening microalgae for some potentially useful agricultural and pharmaceutical secondary metabolites. J. Appl. Phycol. 2004, 16, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pane, G.; Cacciola, G.; Giacco, E.; Mariottini, G.L.; Coppo, E. Assessment of the antimicrobial activity of algae extracts on bacteria responsible of external otitis. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 6440–6452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chang, T.; Ohta, S.; Ikegami, N.; Miyata, H.; Kashimoto, T.; Kondo, M. Antibiotic substances produced by a marine green alga, Dunaliella primolecta. Bioresour. Technol. 1993, 44, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Duff, D.C.B.; Bruce, D.L.; Antia, N.J. The Antibacterial Activity of Marine Planktonic Algae. Can. J. Microbiol. 1966, 12, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kellam, S.J.; Walker, J.M. Antibacterial activity from marine microalgae in laboratory culture. Br. Phycol. J. 1989, 24, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ohta, S.; Chang, T.; Ikegami, N.; Kondo, M.; Miyata, H. Antibiotic substance produced by a newly isolated marine microalga, Chlorococcum HS-101. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1993, 50, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Srinivasakumar, K.P.; Rajashekhar, M. In vitro studies on bactericidal activity and sensitivity pattern of isolated marine microalgae against selective human bacterial pathogens. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2009, 2, 16–23. [Google Scholar]
  58. Viso, A.C.; Pesando, D.; Baby, C. Antibacterial and antifungal properties of some marine diatoms in culture. Bot. Mar. 1987, 30, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cannell, R.J.P.; Owsianka, A.M.; Walker, J.M. Results of a large-scale screening programme to detect antibacterial activity from freshwater algae. Br. Phycol. J. 1988, 23, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Katircioglu, H.; Beyatli, Y.; Aslim, B.; Yüksekdag, Z.; Atici, T. Screening for antimicrobial agent production of some microalgae in freshwater. Internet J. Microbiol. 2005, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  61. Safonova, E.; Reisser, W. Growth promoting and inhibiting effects of extracellular substances of soil microalgae and cyanobacteria on Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus. Phycol. Res. 2005, 53, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ghasemi, Y.; Moradian, A.; Mohagheghzadeh, A.; Shokravi, S.; Morowvat, M.H. Antifungal and antibacterial activity of the microalgae collected from paddy fields of Iran: Characterization of antimicrobial activity of Chroococcus dispersus. J. Biol. Sci. 2007, 7, 904–910. [Google Scholar]
  63. Abedin, R.; Taha, H. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of cyanobacteria and green microalgae. Evaluation of medium components by Plackett-Burman design for antimicrobial activity of Spirulina platensis. Glob. J. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2008, 3, 22–31. [Google Scholar]
  64. Ohta, S.; Shiomi, Y.; Kawashima, A.; Aozasa, O.; Nakao, T.; Nagate, T.; Kitamura, K.; Miyata, H. Antibiotic effect of linolenic acid from Chlorococcum strain HS-101 and Dunaliella primolecta on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Appl. Phycol. 1995, 7, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bhagavathy, S.; Sumathi, P.; Jancy Sherene Bell, I. Green algae Chlorococcum humicola—A new source of bioactive compounds with antimicrobial activity. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2011, 1, S1–S7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Herrero, M.; Ibáñez, E.; Cifuentes, A.; Reglero, G.; Santoyo, S. Dunaliella salina microalga pressurized liquid extracts as potential antimicrobials. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 2471–2477. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Mendiola, J.A.; Santoyo, S.; Cifuentes, A.; Reglero, G.; Ibáñez, E.; Señoráns, F.J. Antimicrobial activity of sub- and supercritical CO2 extracts of the green alga Dunaliella salina. J. Food Prot. 2008, 71, 2138–2143. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Lustigman, B. Comparison of antibiotic production from four ecotypes of the marine alga, Dunaliella. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1988, 40, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Rodríguez-Meizoso, I.; Jaime, L.; Santoyo, S.; Señoráns, F.J.; Cifuentes, A.; Ibáñez, E. Subcritical water extraction and characterization of bioactive compounds from Haematococcus pluvialis microalga. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2010, 51, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Santoyo, S.; Rodríguez-Meizoso, I.; Cifuentes, A.; Jaime, L.; García-Blairsy Reina, G.; Señorans, F.J.; Ibáñez, E. Green processes based on the extraction with pressurized fluids to obtain potent antimicrobials from Haematococcus pluvialis microalgae. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 42, 1213–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Guedes, A.C.; Barbosa, C.R.; Amaro, H.M.; Pereira, C.I.; Malcata, F.X. Microalgal and cyanobacterial cell extracts for use as natural antibacterial additives against food pathogens. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 46, 862–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Najdenski, H.M.; Gigova, L.G.; Iliev, I.I.; Pilarski, P.S.; Lukavský, J.; Tsvetkova, I.V.; Ninova, M.S.; Kussovski, V.K. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of selected microalgae and cyanobacteria. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 1533–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ingebrigtsen, R.A.; Hansen, E.; Andersen, J.H.; Eilertsen, H.C. Light and temperature effects on bioactivity in diatoms. J. Appl. Phycol. 2015, 28, 939–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Del Pilar Sánchez-Saavedra, M.; Licea-Navarro, A.; Bernáldez-Sarabia, J. Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of different species of phytoplankton. Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr. 2010, 45, 531–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mendiola, J.A.; Torres, C.F.; Toré, A.; Martín-Álvarez, P.J.; Santoyo, S.; Arredondo, B.O.; Señoráns, F.J.; Cifuentes, A.; Ibáñez, E. Use of supercritical CO2 to obtain extracts with antimicrobial activity from Chaetoceros muelleri microalga. A correlation with their lipidic content. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2007, 224, 505–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Findlay, J.A.; Patil, A.D. Antibacterial constituents of the diatom Navicula delognei. J. Nat. Prod. 1984, 47, 815–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Desbois, A.P.; Lebl, T.; Yan, L.; Smith, V. Isolation and structure characterization of two antibacterial free fatty acids from marine diatom, Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 81, 755–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Desbois, A.P.; Mearns-Spragg, A.; Smith, V.J. A fatty acid from the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum is antibacterial against diverse bacteria including multi-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Mar. Biotechnol. 2008, 11, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Venkatesan, R.; Karthikayen, R.; Periyanayagi, R.; Sasikala, V.; Balasubramanian, T. Antibacterial activity of the marine diatom, Rhizosolenia alata (Brightwell, 1858) against human pathogens. Res. J. Microbiol. 2007, 2, 98–100. [Google Scholar]
  80. Walter, C.S.; Mahesh, R. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of some marine diatoms in culture. Indian J. Mar. Sci. 2000, 29, 238–242. [Google Scholar]
  81. Cooper, S.; Battat, A.; Marsot, P.; Sylvestre, M. Production of antibacterial activities by two Bacillariophyceae grown in dialysis culture. Can. J. Microbiol. 1983, 29, 338–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bruce, D.L.; Duff, D.C.; Antia, N.J. The identification of two antibacterial products of the marine planktonic alga Isochrysis galbana. Microbiology 1967, 48, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Pawlik-Skowrońska, B. Resistance, accumulation and allocation of zinc in two ecotypes of the green alga Stigeoclonium tenue Kütz. coming from habitats of different heavy metal concentrations. Aquat. Bot. 2003, 75, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Herrero, M.; Mendiola, J.A.; Plaza, M.; Ibañez, E. Screening for Bioactive Compounds from Algae. In Advanced Biofuels and Bioproducts; Lee, J.W., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 833–872. [Google Scholar]
  85. Jørgensen, E.G. Antibiotic substances from cells and culture solutions of unicellular algae with special reference to some chlorophyll derivatives. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 530–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Desbois, A.P.; Walton, M.; Smith, V.J. Differential antibacterial activities of fusiform and oval morphotypes of Phaeodactylum tricornutum (Bacillariophyceae). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 2010, 90, 769–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jüttner, F. Liberation of 5,8,11,14,17-Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Other Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids from Lipids as a Grazer Defense Reaction in Epilithic Diatom Biofilms. J. Phycol. 2001, 37, 744–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kabara, J.J.; Swieczkowski, D.M.; Conley, A.J.; Truant, J.P. Fatty acids and derivatives as antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1972, 2, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Galbraith, H.; Miller, T.B. Physicochemical effects of long chain fatty acids on bacterial cells and their protoplasts. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1973, 36, 647–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Sun, C.Q.; O’Connor, C.J.; Roberton, A.M. Antibacterial actions of fatty acids and monoglycerides against Helicobacter pylori. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2003, 36, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Petschow, B.W.; Batema, R.P.; Ford, L.L. Susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to bactericidal properties of medium-chain monoglycerides and free fatty acids. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1996, 40, 302–306. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  92. Austin, B. Infectious Disease in Aquaculture: Prevention and Control; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  93. Austin, B.; Austin, D.A. Bacterial Fish Pathogens: Disease of Farmed and Wild Fish; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  94. Vandenberghe, J.; Thompson, F.L.; Gomez-Gil, B.; Swings, J. Phenotypic diversity amongst Vibrio isolates from marine aquaculture systems. Aquaculture 2003, 219, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Aguirre-Guzmán, G.; Mejia Ruíz, H.; Ascencio, F. A review of extracellular virulence product of Vibrio species important in diseases of cultivated shrimp. Aquac. Res. 2004, 35, 1395–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Austin, B.; Zhang, X.-H. Vibrio harveyi: A significant pathogen of marine vertebrates and invertebrates. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 43, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Beaz-Hidalgo, R.; Diéguez, A.L.; Cleenwerck, I.; Balboa, S.; Doce, A.; de Vos, P.; Romalde, J.L. Vibrio celticus sp. nov., a new Vibrio species belonging to the Splendidus clade with pathogenic potential for clams. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 33, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Kesarcodi-Watson, A.; Kaspar, H.; Lategan, M.J.; Gibson, L. Two pathogens of Greenshell mussel larvae, Perna canaliculus: Vibrio splendidus and a V. coralliilyticus/neptunius-like isolate. J. Fish Dis. 2009, 32, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Lambert, C.; Nicolas, J.L.; Cilia, V.; Corre, S. Vibrio pectenicida sp. nov., a pathogen of scallop (Pecten maximus) larvae. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1998, 48, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Prado, S.; Romalde, J.L.; Montes, J.; Barja, J.L. Pathogenic bacteria isolated from disease outbreaks in shellfish hatcheries. First description of Vibrio neptunius as an oyster pathogen. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2005, 67, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Travers, M.-A.; Boettcher Miller, K.; Roque, A.; Friedman, C.S. Bacterial diseases in marine bivalves. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2015, 131, 11–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Armstrong, S.M.; Hargrave, B.T.; Haya, K. Antibiotic Use in Finfish Aquaculture: Modes of Action, Environmental Fate, and Microbial Resistance. In Environmental Effects of Marine Finfish Aquaculture; Hargrave, B.T., Ed.; Handbook of Environmental Chemistry; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2005; pp. 341–357. [Google Scholar]
  103. Cabello, F.C. Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: A growing problem for human and animal health and for the environment. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 8, 1137–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Bermdez-Almada, M.C.; Espinosa-Plascenci, A. The Use of Antibiotics in Shrimp Farming. In Health and Environment in Aquaculture; Carvalho, E., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  105. Gräslund, S.; Bengtsson, B.E. Chemicals and biological products used in south-east Asian shrimp farming, and their potential impact on the environment—A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2001, 280, 93–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Primavera, J.H.; Lavilla-Pitogo, C.R.; Ladja, J.M.; Dela Peña, M.R. A survey of chemical and biological products used in intensive prawn farms in the Philippines. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1993, 26, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Silva, E.F.; Soares, M.A.; Calazans, N.F.; Vogeley, J.L.; do Valle, B.C.; Soares, R.; Peixoto, S. Effect of probiotic (Bacillus spp.) addition during larvae and postlarvae culture of the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquac. Res. 2012, 44, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Holbach, M.; Robert, R.; Boudry, P.; Petton, B.; Archambault, P.; Tremblay, R. Scallop larval survival from erythromycin treated broodstock after conditioning without sediment. Aquaculture 2015, 437, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Prado, S.; Romalde, J.L.; Barja, J.L. Review of probiotics for use in bivalve hatcheries. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 145, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Albuquerque Costa, R.; Araújo, R.L.; Souza, O.V.; Vieira, R.H.S.D.F. Antibiotic-Resistant Vibrios in Farmed Shrimp. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 505914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Fernández-Alarcón, C.; Miranda, C.D.; Singer, R.S.; López, Y.; Rojas, R.; Bello, H.; Domínguez, M.; González-Rocha, G. Detection of the floR gene in a diversity of florfenicol resistant Gram-negative bacilli from freshwater salmon farms in Chile. Zoonoses Public Health 2010, 57, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Miranda, C.D.; Zemelman, R. Bacterial resistance to oxytetracycline in Chilean salmon farming. Aquaculture 2002, 212, 31–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Sapkota, A.; Sapkota, A.R.; Kucharski, M.; Burke, J.; McKenzie, S.; Walker, P.; Lawrence, R. Aquaculture practices and potential human health risks: Current knowledge and future priorities. Environ. Int. 2008, 34, 1215–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Citarasu, T. Natural antimicrobial compounds for use in aquaculture. In Infectious Disease in Aquaculture: Prevention and Control; Austin, B., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2012; pp. 419–457. [Google Scholar]
  115. González-Davis, O.; Ponce-Rivas, E.; Sánchez-Saavedra, M.D.P.; Muñoz-Márquez, M.-E.; Gerwick, W.H. Bioprospection of microalgae and cyanobacteria as biocontrol agents against Vibrio campbellii and their use in white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei culture. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2012, 43, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Das, B.K.; Pradhan, J.; Pattnaik, P.; Samantaray, B.R.; Samal, S.K. Production of antibacterials from the freshwater alga Euglena viridis (Ehren). World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 21, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Gastineau, R.; Hardivillier, Y.; Leignel, V.; Tekaya, N.; Morançais, M.; Fleurence, J.; Davidovich, N.; Jacquette, B.; Gaudin, P.; Hellio, C.; et al. Greening effect on oysters and biological activities of the blue pigments produced by the diatom Haslea karadagensis (Naviculaceae). Aquaculture 2012, 368, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Gastineau, R.; Pouvreau, J.-B.; Hellio, C.; Morançais, M.; Fleurence, J.; Gaudin, P.; Bourgougnon, N.; Mouget, J.-L. Biological activities of purified marennine, the blue pigment responsible for the greening of oysters. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 3599–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Pouvreau, J.-B. Purification et Caractérisation du Pigment Bleu-Vert “Marennine” Synthétisé par la Diatomée Marine Haslea ostrearia (Gaillon/Bory) Simonsen: Propriétés Physico-Chimiques et Activités Biologiques. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  120. Naviner, M.; Bergé, J.-P.; Durand, P.; Le Bris, H. Antibacterial activity of the marine diatom Skeletonema costatum against aquacultural pathogens. Aquaculture 1999, 174, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Berland, B.R.; Bonin, D.J.; Cornu, A.L.; Maestrini, S.Y.; Marino, J.-P. The antibacterial substances of the marine alga Stichochrysis immobilis (chrysophyta). J. Phycol. 1972, 8, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Austin, B.; Day, J.G. Inhibition of prawn pathogenic Vibrio spp. by a commercial spray-dried preparation of Tetraselmis suecica. Aquaculture 1990, 90, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Austin, B.; Baudet, E.; Stobie, M. Inhibition of bacterial fish pathogens by Tetraselmis suecica. J. Fish Dis. 1992, 15, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Lio-Po, G.D.; Leaño, E.M.; Peñaranda, M.M.D.; Villa-Franco, A.U.; Sombito, C.D.; Guanzon, N.G., Jr. Anti-luminous Vibrio factors associated with the “green water” grow-out culture of the tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon. Aquaculture 2005, 250, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kokou, F.; Makridis, P.; Kentouri, M.; Divanach, P. Antibacterial activity in microalgae cultures. Aquac. Res. 2012, 43, 1520–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Molina-Cárdenas, C.A.; del Pilar Sánchez-Saavedra, M.; Lizárraga-Partida, M.L. Inhibition of pathogenic Vibrio by the microalgae Isochrysis galbana. J. Appl. Phycol. 2014, 26, 2347–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Terekhova, V.E.; Aizdaicher, N.A.; Buzoleva, L.S.; Somov, G.P. Influence of extrametabolites of marine microalgae on the reproduction of the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes. Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 2009, 35, 355–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Kogure, K.; Simidu, U.; Taga, N. Effect of Skeletonema costatum (Grev.) Cleve on the growth of marine bacteria. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1979, 36, 201–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Makridis, P.; Costa, R.A.; Dinis, M.T. Microbial conditions and antimicrobial activity in cultures of two microalgae species, Tetraselmis chuii and Chlorella minutissima, and effect on bacterial load of enriched Artemia metanauplii. Aquaculture 2006, 255, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Turcotte, F. Effet Protecteur d’un Pigment (Marennine) de Diatomée Bleue Contre la Bactérie Pathogène Vibrio splendidus chez les Larves de Moule Bleue Mytilus edulis: Utilisation Potentielle en Ecloseries de Vivalves. Master’s Thesis, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, QC, Canada, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  131. Olsen, A.I.; Olsen, Y.; Attramadal, Y.; Christie, K.; Birkbeck, T.H.; Skjermo, J.; Vadstein, O. Effects of short term feeding of microalgae on the bacterial flora associated with juvenile Artemia franciscana. Aquaculture 2000, 190, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Regunathan, C.; Wesley, S.G. Control of Vibrio spp. in shrimp hatcheries using the green algae Tetraselmis suecica. Asian Fish. Sci. 2004, 17, 147–158. [Google Scholar]
  133. Salvesen, I.; Skjermo, J.; Vadstein, O. Growth of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) during first feeding in relation to the proportion of r/K-strategists in the bacterial community of the rearing water. Aquaculture 1999, 175, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Lavilla-Pitogo, C.R.; Albright, L.J.; Paner, M.G. Will microbial manipulation sustain the ecological balance in shrimp (Penaeus monodon) hatcheries? In Advances in Shrimp Biotechnology, Proceedings of the 5th Asian Fisheries Forum on Special Session on Shrimp Biotechnology, Chiengmai, Thailand, 11–14 November 1998; Flegel, T.W., Ed.; National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology: Bangkok, Thailand, 1998; pp. 185–192. [Google Scholar]
  135. Kusumaningrum, H.P.; Zainuri, M. Detection of bacteria and fungi associated with Penaeus monodon postlarvae mortality. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2015, 23, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Davey, M.R.; Anthony, P.; Power, J.B.; Lowe, K.C. Plant protoplasts: Status and biotechnological perspectives. Biotechnol. Adv. 2005, 23, 131–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Li, S.-S.; Tsai, H.-J. Transgenic microalgae as a non-antibiotic bactericide producer to defend against bacterial pathogen infection in the fish digestive tract. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2009, 26, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Øie, G.; Reitan, K.I.; Olsen, Y. Comparison of rotifer culture quality with yeast plus oil and algal-based cultivation diets. Aquac. Int. 1994, 2, 225–238. [Google Scholar]
  139. Pouvreau, J.-B.; Morançais, M.; Massé, G.; Rosa, P.; Robert, J.-M.; Fleurence, J.; Pondaven, P. Purification of the blue-green pigment “marennine” from the marine tychopelagic diatom Haslea ostrearia (Gaillon/Bory) Simonsen. J. Appl. Phycol. 2006, 18, 769–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Garnier, M.; Labreuche, Y.; Garcia, C.; Robert, M.; Nicolas, J.-L. Evidence for the Involvement of Pathogenic Bacteria in Summer Mortalities of the Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas. Microb. Ecol. 2007, 53, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Garnier, M.; Labreuche, Y.; Nicolas, J.-L. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Vibrio aestuarianus subsp. francensis subsp. nov., a pathogen of the oyster Crassostrea gigas. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 31, 358–365. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  142. Gay, M.; Renault, T.; Pons, A.-M.; Le Roux, F. Two Vibrio splendidus related strains collaborate to kill Crassostrea gigas: Taxonomy and host alterations. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2004, 62, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Goudenège, D.; Travers, M.A.; Lemire, A.; Petton, B.; Haffner, P.; Labreuche, Y.; Tourbiez, D.; Mangenot, S.; Calteau, A.; Mazel, D.; et al. A single regulatory gene is sufficient to alter Vibrio aestuarianus pathogenicity in oysters. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 4189–4199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Genard, B.; Miner, P.; Nicolas, J.-L.; Moraga, D.; Boudry, P.; Pernet, F.; Tremblay, R. Integrative Study of Physiological Changes Associated with Bacterial Infection in Pacific Oyster Larvae. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Travers, M.-A.; Mersni Achour, R.; Haffner, P.; Tourbiez, D.; Cassone, A.-L.; Morga, B.; Doghri, I.; Garcia, C.; Renault, T.; Fruitier-Arnaudin, I.; et al. First description of French V. tubiashii strains pathogenic to mollusk: I. Characterization of isolates and detection during mortality events. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2014, 123, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Anaissie, E.; Bodey, G.P. Nosocomial fungal infections. Old problems and new challenges. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 1989, 3, 867–882. [Google Scholar]
  147. Alangaden, G.J. Nosocomial fungal infections: Epidemiology, infection control, and prevention. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2011, 25, 201–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Manuel, R.J.; Kibbler, C.C. The epidemiology and prevention of invasive aspergillosis. J. Hosp. Infect. 1998, 39, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Wey, S.B.; Mori, M.; Pfaller, M.A.; Woolson, R.F.; Wenzel, R.P. Hospital-acquired candidemia: The attributable mortality and excess length of stay. Arch. Intern. Med. 1988, 148, 2642–2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Ghannoum, M.A.; Rice, L.B. Antifungal agents: Mode of action, mechanisms of resistance, and correlation of these mechanisms with bacterial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 501–517. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  151. Accoceberry, I.; Noël, T. Antifongiques: Cibles cellulaires et mécanismes de résistance. Thérapie 2006, 61, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. El Amraoui, B.; El Amraoui, M.; Cohen, N.; Fassouane, A. Anti-Candida and anti-Cryptococcus antifungal produced by marine microorganisms. J. Med. Mycol. 2014, 24, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Cheung, R.C.F.; Wong, J.H.; Pan, W.L.; Chan, Y.S.; Yin, C.M.; Dan, X.L.; Wang, H.X.; Fang, E.F.; Lam, S.K.; Ngai, P.H.K.; et al. Antifungal and antiviral products of marine organisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 3475–3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Hong, J.-H.; Jang, S.; Heo, Y.M.; Min, M.; Lee, H.; Lee, Y.M.; Lee, H.; Kim, J.-J. Investigation of marine-derived fungal diversity and their exploitable biological activities. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 4137–4155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Shishido, T.K.; Humisto, A.; Jokela, J.; Liu, L.; Wahlsten, M.; Tamrakar, A.; Fewer, D.P.; Permi, P.; Andreote, A.P.D.; Fiore, M.F.; et al. Antifungal compounds from cyanobacteria. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 2124–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Wang, Y.-T.; Xue, Y.-R.; Liu, C.-H. A brief review of bioactive metabolites derived from deep-sea fungi. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 4594–4616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Xu, L.; Meng, W.; Cao, C.; Wang, J.; Shan, W.; Wang, Q. Antibacterial and antifungal compounds from marine fungi. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 3479–3513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Gauthier, M.J. Activité antibactérienne d’une Diatomée marine: Asterionella notata (Grun). Rev. Intern. Oceanogr. Med. 1969, 25, 103–165. [Google Scholar]
  159. Nagai, H.; Satake, M.; Yasumoto, T. Antimicrobial activities of polyether compounds of dinoflagellate origins. J. Appl. Phycol. 1990, 2, 305–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Pesando, D.; Gnassia-Barelli, M.; Gueho, E. Antifungal properties of some marine algae. In Marine Algae in Pharmaceutical Science; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1979; pp. 461–472. [Google Scholar]
  161. Kellam, S.J.; Cannell, R.J.P.; Owsianka, A.M.; Walker, J.M. Results of a large-scale screening programme to detect antifungal activity from marine and freshwater microalgae in laboratory culture. Br. Phycol. J. 1988, 23, 45–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Gueho, E.; Pesando, D.; Barelli, M. Propriétés antifongiques d’une diatomeé Chaetoceros lauderi ralfs C C. Mycopathologia 1977, 60, 105–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Pesando, D.; Gnassia-Barelli, M.; Gueho, E. Partial characterization of a specific antibiotic, antifungal substance isolated from the marine diatom Chaetoceros lauderi Ralfs. In Marine Algae in Pharmaceutical Science; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1979; Volume 1, pp. 447–459. [Google Scholar]
  164. Washida, K.; Koyama, T.; Yamada, K.; Kita, M.; Uemura, D. Karatungiols A and B, two novel antimicrobial polyol compounds, from the symbiotic marine dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 2521–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Nagai, H.; Mikami, Y.; Yazawa, K.; Gonoi, T.; Yasumoto, T. Biological activities of novel polyether antifungals, gambieric acids A and B from a marine dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus toxicus. J. Antibiot. 1993, 46, 520–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Sharma, G.M.; Michaels, L.; Burkholder, P.R. Goniodomin, a new antibiotic from a dinoflagellate. J. Antibiot. 1968, 21, 659–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Murakami, M.; Makabe, K.; Yamaguchi, K.; Konosu, S.; Wälchli, M.R. Goniodomin a, a novel polyether macrolide from the dinoflagellate Goniodoma pseudogoniaulax. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 1149–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Houdai, T.; Matsuoka, S.; Matsumori, N.; Murata, M. Membrane-permeabilizing activities of amphidinol 3, polyene-polyhydroxy antifungal from a marine dinoflagellate. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1667, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Satake, M.; Murata, M.; Yasumoto, T.; Fujita, T.; Naoki, H. Amphidinol, a polyhydroxy-polyene antifungal agent with an unprecedented structure, from a marine dinoflagellate, Amphidinium klebsii. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9859–9861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Yanong, R.P.E. Fungal diseases of fish. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Exot. Anim. Pract. 2003, 6, 377–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Noga, E.J. Fish Disease: Diagnosis and Treatment; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  172. Anater, A.; Manyes, L.; Meca, G.; Ferrer, E.; Luciano, F.B.; Pimpão, C.T.; Font, G. Mycotoxins and their consequences in aquaculture: A review. Aquaculture 2016, 451, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Trakranrungsie, N. Plant derived antifungals-trends and potential applications in veterinary medicine: A mini-review. In Science against Microbial Pathogens: Communicating Current Research and Technological Advances; Mendez-Vilas, A., Ed.; Formatex Research Center: Badajoz, Spain, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  174. Hussein, M.M.A.; El-Feki, M.A.; Hatai, K.; Yamamoto, A. Inhibitory effects of thymoquinone from Nigella sativa on pathogenic Saprolegnia in fish. Biocontrol Sci. 2002, 7, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Mori, T.; Hirose, H.; Hanjavanit, C.; Hatai, K. Antifungal activities of plant extracts against some aquatic fungi. Biocontrol Sci. 2002, 7, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Udomkusonsri, P.; Trongvanichnam, K.; Limpoka, M.; Klangkaew, N.; Kusucharit, N. In vitro efficacy of the antifungal activity of some Thai medicinal-plants on the pathogenic fungus, Saprolegnia parasitica H2, in fish. Kasetsart J. Nat. Sci. 2007, 41, 56–61. [Google Scholar]
  177. Hussein, M.M.A.; Wada, S.; Hatai, K.; Yamamoto, A. Antimycotic activity of eugenol against selected water molds. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 2000, 12, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Mousavi, S.M.; Mirzargar, S.S.; Ebrahim Zadeh Mousavi, H.; Omid Baigi, R.; Khosravi, A.; Bahonar, A.; Ahmadi, M. Evaluation of antifungal activity of new combined essential oils in comparaison with malachite green on hatching rate in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) eggs. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2009, 4, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
  179. Rhoobunjongde, W.; Hatai, K.; Wada, S.; Kubota, S.S. Fusarium moniliforme (Sheldon) isolated from gills of kuruma prawn Penaeus japonicus (Bate) with black gill disease. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 1991, 57, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Tolosa, J.; Font, G.; Mañes, J.; Ferrer, E. Natural occurrence of emerging Fusarium mycotoxins in feed and fish from aquaculture. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 12462–12470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Grovel, O.; Pouchus, Y.F.; Verbist, J.-F. Accumulation of gliotoxin, a cytotoxic mycotoxin from Aspergillus fumigatus, in blue mussel (Mytilus edulis). Toxicon 2003, 42, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Matallah-Boutiba, A.; Ruiz, N.; Sallenave-Namont, C.; Grovel, O.; Amiard, J.-C.; Pouchus, Y.F.; Boutiba, Z. Screening for toxigenic marine-derived fungi in Algerian mussels and their immediate environment. Aquaculture 2012, 342–343, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Karthikeyan, V.; Gopalakrishnan, A. A novel report of phytopathogenic fungi Gilbertella persicaria infection on Penaeus monodon. Aquaculture 2014, 430, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Karthikeyan, V.; Selvakumar, P.; Gopalakrishnan, A. A novel report of fungal pathogen Aspergillus awamori causing black gill infection on Litopenaeus vannamei (pacific white shrimp). Aquaculture 2015, 444, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Kitazato, K.; Wang, Y.; Kobayashi, N. Viral infectious disease and natural products with antiviral activity. Drug Discov. Ther. 2007, 1, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  186. Yasuhara-Bell, J.; Lu, Y. Marine compounds and their antiviral activities. Antivir. Res. 2010, 86, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Husseiny, S.; Ibrahem, A.B.B.; El Sayed, A.F.M.; Mohammed, F.A. In vitro evaluation of anti-microbial activities of marine streptomyces against viral models, bacterial and fungal Strains. Int. J. Virol. 2015, 11, 20–31. [Google Scholar]
  188. Vo, T.-S.; Ngo, D.-H.; Ta, Q.V.; Kim, S.-K. Marine organisms as a therapeutic source against herpes simplex virus infection. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 44, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Gerber, P.; Dutcher, J.D.; Adams, E.V.; Sherman, J.H. Protective Effect of Seaweed Extracts for Chicken Embryos Infected with Influenza B or Mumps Virus. Exp. Biol. Med. 1958, 99, 590–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Ehresmann, D.W.; Deig, E.F.; Hatch, M.T.; DiSalvo, L.H.; Vedros, N.A. Antiviral Substances from California Marine Algae1. J. Phycol. 1977, 13, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Bouhlal Rhimou, R.H. Antiviral activity of the extracts of Rhodophyceae from Morocco. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 7968–7975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Luescher-Mattli, M. Algae, a possible source for new drugs in the treatment of HIV and other viral diseases. Curr. Med. Chem.—Anti-Infect. Agents 2003, 2, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Schaeffer, D.J.; Krylov, V.S. Anti-HIV activity of extracts and compounds from algae and cyanobacteria. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2000, 45, 208–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Soares, A.R.; Robaina, M.C.S.; Mendes, G.S.; Silva, T.S.L.; Gestinari, L.M.S.; Pamplona, O.S.; Yoneshigue-Valentin, Y.; Kaiser, C.R.; Romanos, M.T.V. Antiviral activity of extracts from Brazilian seaweeds against herpes simplex virus. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2012, 22, 714–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Wijesekara, I.; Pangestuti, R.; Kim, S.-K. Biological activities and potential health benefits of sulfated polysaccharides derived from marine algae. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Arif, J.M.; Farooqui, A.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Al-Karrawi, M.; Al-Hazmi, A.; Al-Sagair, O.A. Chapter 5: Novel bioactive peptides from cyanobacteria: Functional, biochemical, and biomedical significance. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry; Bioactive Natural Products; Atta-ur-Rahman, Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 36, pp. 111–161. [Google Scholar]
  197. Hayashi, T.; Hayashi, K.; Maeda, M.; Kojima, I. Calcium spirulan, an inhibitor of enveloped virus replication, from a blue-green alga Spirulina platensis. J. Nat. Prod. 1996, 59, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Rechter, S.; König, T.; Auerochs, S.; Thulke, S.; Walter, H.; Dörnenburg, H.; Walter, C.; Marschall, M. Antiviral activity of Arthrospira-derived spirulan-like substances. Antivir. Res. 2006, 72, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Ahmadi, A.; Zorofchian Moghadamtousi, S.; Abubakar, S.; Zandi, K. Antiviral potential of algae polysaccharides isolated from marine sources: A review. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 825203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Huleihel, M.; Ishanu, V.; Tal, J.; Arad, S. Antiviral effect of red microalgal polysaccharides on Herpes simplex and Varicella zoster viruses. J. Appl. Phycol. 2001, 13, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Santoyo, S.; Plaza, M.; Jaime, L.; Ibañez, E.; Reglero, G.; Señorans, F.J. Pressurized liquid extraction as an alternative process to obtain antiviral agents from the edible microalga Chlorella vulgaris. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 8522–8527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Ohta, S.; Ono, F.; Shiomi, Y.; Nakao, T.; Aozasa, O.; Nagate, T.; Kitamura, K.; Yamaguchi, S.; Nishi, M.; Miyata, H. Anti-Herpes Simplex Virus substances produced by the marine green alga, Dunaliella primolecta. J. Appl. Phycol. 1998, 10, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Santoyo, S.; Jaime, L.; Plaza, M.; Herrero, M.; Rodriguez-Meizoso, I.; Ibañez, E.; Reglero, G. Antiviral compounds obtained from microalgae commonly used as carotenoid sources. J. Appl. Phycol. 2011, 24, 731–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. De Jesus Raposo, M.F.; de Morais, A.M.M.B.; de Morais, R.M.S.C. Influence of sulphate on the composition and antibacterial and antiviral properties of the exopolysaccharide from Porphyridium cruentum. Life Sci. 2014, 101, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Radonić, A.; Thulke, S.; Achenbach, J.; Kurth, A.; Vreemann, A.; König, T.; Walter, C.; Possinger, K.; Nitsche, A. Anionic polysaccharides from phototrophic microorganisms exhibit antiviral activities to Vaccinia virus. J. Antivir. Antiretrovir. 2010, 2, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Huleihel, M.; Ishanu, V.; Tal, J.; Arad, S. Activity of Porphyridium sp. polysaccharide against Herpes simplex viruses in vitro and in vivo. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2002, 50, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Talyshinsky, M.M.; Souprun, Y.Y.; Huleihel, M.M. Anti-viral activity of red microalgal polysaccharides against retroviruses. Cancer Cell Int. 2002, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Bergé, J.P.; Bourgougnon, N.; Alban, S.; Pojer, F.; Billaudel, S.; Chermann, J.C.; Robert, J.M.; Franz, G. Antiviral and anticoagulant activities of a water-soluble fraction of the marine diatom Haslea ostrearia. Planta Med. 1999, 65, 604–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Lee, J.-B.; Hayashi, K.; Hirata, M.; Kuroda, E.; Suzuki, E.; Kubo, Y.; Hayashi, T. Antiviral sulfated polysaccharide from Navicula directa, a diatom collected from deep-sea water in Toyama bay. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 29, 2135–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Hasui, M.; Matsuda, M.; Okutani, K.; Shigeta, S. In vitro antiviral activities of sulfated polysaccharides from a marine microalga (Cochlodinium polykrikoides) against human immunodeficiency virus and other enveloped viruses. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1995, 17, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Yim, J.H.; Kim, S.J.; Ahn, S.H.; Lee, C.K.; Rhie, K.T.; Lee, H.K. Antiviral effects of sulfated exopolysaccharide from the marine microalga Gyrodinium impudicum strain KG03. Mar. Biotechnol. 2004, 6, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Kim, M.; Yim, J.H.; Kim, S.-Y.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, W.G.; Kim, S.J.; Kang, P.-S.; Lee, C.-K. In vitro inhibition of influenza A virus infection by marine microalga-derived sulfated polysaccharide p-KG03. Antivir. Res. 2012, 93, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Ahne, W. Viral infections of aquatic animals with special reference to Asian aquaculture. Annu. Rev. Fish Dis. 1994, 4, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Arzul, I.; Corbeil, S.; Morga, B.; Renault, T. Viruses infecting marine molluscs. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2016. under review. [Google Scholar]
  215. Crane, M.; Hyatt, A. Viruses of Fish: An Overview of Significant Pathogens. Viruses 2011, 3, 2025–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Segarra, A.; Pépin, J.F.; Arzul, I.; Morga, B.; Faury, N.; Renault, T. Detection and description of a particular Ostreid herpesvirus 1 genotype associated with massive mortality outbreaks of Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas, in France in 2008. Virus Res. 2010, 153, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Arzul, I.; Renault, T.; Lipart, C.; Davison, A.J. Evidence for interspecies transmission of oyster herpesvirus in marine bivalves. J. Gen. Virol. 2001, 82, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Gomez-Casado, E.; Estepa, A.; Coll, J.M. A comparative review on European-farmed finfish RNA viruses and their vaccines. Vaccine 2011, 29, 2657–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Sommerset, I.; Krossøy, B.; Biering, E.; Frost, P. Vaccines for fish in aquaculture. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2005, 4, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Loker, E.S.; Adema, C.M.; Zhang, S.-M.; Kepler, T.B. Invertebrate immune systems—Not homogeneous, not simple, not well understood. Immunol. Rev. 2004, 198, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Rowley, A.F.; Pope, E.C. Vaccines and crustacean aquaculture—A mechanistic exploration. Aquaculture 2012, 334–337, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Johnson, K.N.; van Hulten, M.C.W.; Barnes, A.C. “Vaccination” of shrimp against viral pathogens: Phenomenology and underlying mechanisms. Vaccine 2008, 26, 4885–4892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Venegas, C.A.; Nonaka, L.; Mushiake, K.; Nishizawa, T.; Murog, K. Quasi-immune response of Penaeus japonicus to penaeid rod-shaped DNA virus (PRDV). Dis. Aquat. Org. 2000, 42, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Green, T.J.; Montagnani, C. Poly I: C induces a protective antiviral immune response in the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) against subsequent challenge with Ostreid herpesvirus (OsHV-1 μvar). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2013, 35, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Jemaà, M.; Morin, N.; Cavelier, P.; Cau, J.; Strub, J.M.; Delsert, C. Adult somatic progenitor cells and hematopoiesis in oysters. J. Exp. Biol. 2014, 217, 3067–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Sivasankar, P.; Anix Vivek Santhiya, A.; Kanaga, V. A review on plants and herbal extracts against viral diseases in aquaculture. J. Med. Plants Stud. 2015, 3, 75–79. [Google Scholar]
  227. Balasubramanian, G.; Sarathi, M.; Venkatesan, C.; Thomas, J.; Hameed, A.S.S. Studies on the immunomodulatory effect of extract of Cyanodon dactylon in shrimp, Penaeus monodon, and its efficacy to protect the shrimp from white spot syndrome virus (WSSV). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2008, 25, 820–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Fabregas, J.; García, D.; Fernandez-Alonso, M.; Rocha, A.I.; Gómez-Puertas, P.; Escribano, J.M.; Otero, A.; Coll, J.M. In vitro inhibition of the replication of haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV) and African swine fever virus (ASFV) by extracts from marine microalgae. Antivir. Res. 1999, 44, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Katharios, P.; Papadakis, I.; Prapas, A.; Dermon, C.; Ampatzis, K.; Divanach, P. Mortality control of viral encephalopathy and retinopathy in 0+ grouper Epinephelus marginatus after prolonged bath in dense Chlorella minutissima culture. Bull. Eur. Assoc. Fish Pathol. 2005, 25, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Growth inhibition of Vibrio tasmaniensis CIP 107715 by purified marennine, the blue pigment produced by Haslea ostrearia. (a) V. tasmaniensis was grown over night at 25 °C, cells were then washed with sterile water 2 times and adjusted to an OD600 = 0.5. Cells were added to wells with marennine in the following concentrations: 0, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 and 1000 μg per mL. Kinetics were run at OD600 for 48 h, with measurements taken every 30 min (n = 3); (b) Relative values were graphed in order to account for the absorbance differences due to the pigment. The effective concentration reducing bacteria growth rate by 50%, EC50, was estimated at 19.14 μg per mL (Standard error: 6.73) (original results).
Figure 1. Growth inhibition of Vibrio tasmaniensis CIP 107715 by purified marennine, the blue pigment produced by Haslea ostrearia. (a) V. tasmaniensis was grown over night at 25 °C, cells were then washed with sterile water 2 times and adjusted to an OD600 = 0.5. Cells were added to wells with marennine in the following concentrations: 0, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 and 1000 μg per mL. Kinetics were run at OD600 for 48 h, with measurements taken every 30 min (n = 3); (b) Relative values were graphed in order to account for the absorbance differences due to the pigment. The effective concentration reducing bacteria growth rate by 50%, EC50, was estimated at 19.14 μg per mL (Standard error: 6.73) (original results).
Marinedrugs 14 00159 g001
Figure 2. Relative growth inhibition of three Vibrio species, V. aestuarianus, V. coralliilyticus, V. tubiashii, after a 48 h exposition to purified extracellular marennine, produced by the diatom Haslea ostrearia. Each strain was grown over night in a Mueller-Hinton Broth medium at 22 °C and their concentration was then adjusted to an OD600 = 0.1. Bacterial cultures were exposed for 48 h to marennine at a concentration of 100 µg per mL before OD measurement. The relative growth inhibition was assessed in comparison with the growth of the control, not exposed to marennine. Results are means ± SD, for two separate experiments conducted using triplicates. A significant difference of sensitivity (*) between the two V. aestuarianus and V. coralliilyticus strains was observed (ANOVA statistical test, p-value 0.01 and 7 × 10−4 respectively). (original results).
Figure 2. Relative growth inhibition of three Vibrio species, V. aestuarianus, V. coralliilyticus, V. tubiashii, after a 48 h exposition to purified extracellular marennine, produced by the diatom Haslea ostrearia. Each strain was grown over night in a Mueller-Hinton Broth medium at 22 °C and their concentration was then adjusted to an OD600 = 0.1. Bacterial cultures were exposed for 48 h to marennine at a concentration of 100 µg per mL before OD measurement. The relative growth inhibition was assessed in comparison with the growth of the control, not exposed to marennine. Results are means ± SD, for two separate experiments conducted using triplicates. A significant difference of sensitivity (*) between the two V. aestuarianus and V. coralliilyticus strains was observed (ANOVA statistical test, p-value 0.01 and 7 × 10−4 respectively). (original results).
Marinedrugs 14 00159 g002
Table 1. Antibacterial activity from microalgae against human pathogenic bacteria.
Table 1. Antibacterial activity from microalgae against human pathogenic bacteria.
Microalgae SpeciesAntibacterial Compound/Fraction(G+) Bacteria Growth Inhibition(G−) Bacteria Growth InhibitionReferences
Green microalgae
Chlamydomonas reinhardtiiAqueous or methanolic and exanolic extractsBacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidisEscherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhi[62]
Chlorella minutissimaEthanolic extractsS. aureusE. coli, P. aeruginosa[51]
Chlorella pyrenoidosaVarious organic solvent extractsB. subtilis, S. aureusE. coli, P. aeruginosa[63]
Chlorella vulgarisChlorellinB. subtilis, S. aureus, Streptococcus pyogenesE. coli, P. aeruginosa[49]
Chlorella vulgarisAqueous or methanolic and hexanolic extractsB. subtilis, S. aureus, S. epidermidisE. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. typhi[62]
Chlorococcum HS-101alpha-linolenic acidB. subtilis, Bacillus cereus, S. aureus, MRSAEnterobacter aerogenes[53,56,64]
Chlorococcum humicolaVarious organic solvent extracts and purified pigments (carotenoid, chlorophyll)B. subtilis, S. aureusE. coli, P. aeruginosa, Salmonella typhimurium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Vibrio cholerae[65]
Desmococcus olivaceusEthanolic extractsS. aureusE. coli, P. aeruginosa[51]
Dunaliella primolectaPolyunsatured fatty acids: alpha-linolenic acidB. cereus, B. subtilis, S. aureus, MRSAE. aerogenes[53,64]
Dunaliella salinaIndolic derivative, polyunsaturated fatty acids, beta-ionone and neophytadieneS. aureusE. coli, P. aeruginosa[52,66,67]
Dunaliella sp.Lysed cellsS. epidermidis, Micrococcus luteusProteus vulgaris[68]
Haematococcus pluvialisShort-chain fatty acidsS. aureusE. coli[69,70]
Klebsormidium sp.PelletB. subtilisNe[50]
Pseudokirchneriella subcapitataMethanolic extractsS. aureusP. aeruginosa[52]
Scenedesmus obliquusLong chain fatty acidsS. aureusE. coli, P. aeruginosa, Salmonella sp.[71]
Scenedesmus quadricaudaVarious organic solvent extractsB. subtilis, S. aureusE. coli, P. aeruginosa[63]
Scenedesmus sp.Ethanolic extractsS. aureusE. coli, P. aeruginosa[51]
Red microalgae
Porphyridium aerugineumPhycobiliproteinsS. aureus, S. pyogenesNt[72]
Porphyridium purpureumMethanolic extractsB. subtilisE. coli[50]
Porphyridium sordidumPelletB. subtilisE. coli, Pseudomonas fluorescens[50]
Rhodella reticulataExopolysaccharidesS. aureus, B. cereus, S. pyogenesNe[72]
Asterionella glacialisWhole cellS. aureus, S. epidermidis, M. luteus, Sarcina sp.E. coli[58]
Attheya longicornisMethanolic extractsS. aureus, MRSANe[73]
Chaetoceros muelleriUnsaturated fatty acid-containing lipidic fractions (triglycerides and docosa-pentaenoic acid (DPA))B. subtilis, S. aureusE. coli[74,75]
Navicula delognei (Parlibellus delognei)transphytol ester, hexadecatetraenoic and octadecatetraenoic acidsS. aureus, S. epidermidisS. typhimurium, P. vulgaris[76]
Phaeodactylum tricornutumeicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), palmitoleic and hexadecatrienoic acids (HTA)B. cereus, Bacillus weihenstephanensis, S. aureus, S. epidermidis, MRSANe[77,78]
Rhizosolenia alataVarious organic solvent extractsB. subtilis, S. aureusE. coli, P. aeruginosa, P. vulgaris, S. typhi, V. cholerae[79]
Thalassiothrix frauenfeldiiNon-axenic culture and organic solvent extractsB. subtilis, S. aureusE. coli, P. aeruginosa, Salmonella paratyphi, S. typhi, V. cholerae[80]
Skeletonema costatumAqueous and organic extractsB. subtilis, S. aureusP. aeruginosa[81]
Skeletonema costatumVarious organic solvents extractsS. aureus, Staphylococcus peoria, S. fecalis, S. pyogenesNe[54]
Isochrysis galbanaChlorophyll a derivatives: pheophytin a and chlorophyllide aS. aureus, Streptococcus faecalis, S. pyogenes, Micrococcus sp.Nt[54,82]
Ne = No effect of the microalgal compound against the bacteria tested; Nt = Not tested; MRSA = Methicillin resistant S. aureus.
Table 2. Antibacterial activity from microalgae against diseases in aquaculture.
Table 2. Antibacterial activity from microalgae against diseases in aquaculture.
Microalgae SpeciesCompound/Fraction TestedTarget Bacteria/Antibacterial EffectReferences
In vitro experiments
Chaetoceros lauderiWhole cellVibrio anguillarum, Aeromonas salmonicida[58]
Dunaliella tertiolectaAqueous extractVibrio campbellii[115]
Euglena viridisOrganic solvent extractsAeromonas hydrophila, Edwardsiella tarda, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas putida Vibrio alginolyticus, V. anguillarum, Vibrio fluvialis, Vibrio harveyi, Vibrio parahaemolyticus[116]
Haslea karadagensisPurified pigment (intra- and extracellular forms)Polaribacter irgensii, Pseudoalteromonas elyakowii, Vibrio aestuarianus[117]
Haslea ostreariaPurified marennine (intra- and extracellular forms)P. irgensii, P. elyakowii, V. aestuarianus[118]
Purified marennine (intracellular form)V. anguillarum[119]
Purified marennine (extracellular form)Vibrio splendidus-related[30]
Phaeodactylum tricornutumAqueous and organic extractsAlcaligenes cupidus, Alteromonas communis, Alteromonas haloplanktis, Vibrio fischeri, V. parahaemolyticus[81]
Polyunsaturated free fatty acidVibrio anguillarum, M. luteus, Photobacterium sp. [78]
Skeletonema costatumAqueous and Organic extractsA. cupidus, A. communis, Pseudomonas marina, V. fischeri, V. parahaemolyticus[81]
Organic and purified extractsV. anguillarum, Vibrio mytili T, Vibrio spp. S322, Vibrio spp. VRP[120]
Aqueous extractsVibrio campbellii[115]
Stichochrysis immobilisMicroalgal homogenatesXanthomonas sp. 1, Flavobacterium sp. 1, Pseudomonas sp. Strain 101[121]
Tetraselmis suecicaMicroalgal supernatant and microalgal homogenates of a commercial spray-dried preparationA. hydrophila, A. salmonicida, Serratia liquefaciens, V. alginolyticus, V. anguillarum, V. parahaemolyticus, Vibrio salmonicida, Vibrio vulnificus, Yersinia ruckeri[122,123]
Co-culture experiments
Chaetoceros calcitransAxenic cultureV. harveyi[124]
Chlorella minutissimaAxenic cultureV. alginolyticus, V. anguillarum, Vibrio lentus, V. parahaemolyticus, Vibrio scophthalmi, V. splendidus[125]
Chlorella sp.Axenic cultureV. harveyi[40]
Isochrysis galbanaNon-axenic cultureV. alginolyticus, V. campbellii, V. harveyi[126]
Isochrysis sp.Axenic cultureV. alginolyticus, V. lentus, V. splendidus, V. scophthalmi, V. parahaemolyticus, V. anguillarum[125]
Nannochloropsis sp.Axenic cultureV. alginolyticus, V. anguillarum, V. lentus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. scophthalmi, V. splendidus[125]
Nitzchia sp.Axenic cultureV. harveyi[124]
S. costatumExometabolites in the culture fluidListeria monocytogenes[127]
Axenic culturePseudomonas sp., Vibrio sp.[128]
Tetraselmis chuiAxenic cultureV. alginolyticus, V. anguillarum, V. lentus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. scophthalmi, V. splendidus[125]
In vivo experiments
C. minutissima30 min incubation of enriched Artemia metanaupliiDecrease of the bacterial load in Artemia and diminution of presumptive Vibrio[129]
D. tertiolectaDaily diet of Artemia franciscanaProtection against V. campbellii and V. proteolyticus[39]
H. ostreariaIncubation of Mytilus edulis larvae with supernatant containing extracellular pigmentsHigher survival and physiological conditions of larvae challenged with V. splendidus-related[130]
Tetraselmis sp.4 h incubation of Artemia franciscanaDiminution of associated bacteria, better bacterial diversity and the flora less dominated by V. alginolyticus[131]
T. suecicaFood supplement for the Atlantic salmon Solmo salarReduction of A. hydrophila, A. salmonicida, Serratia liquefaciens, V. anguillarum, V. salmonicida, Y. ruckeri infections, reduction of bacterial populations in water tanks and increase of the microbial communities in the digestive tract[123]
Food supplement for the broodstock and partial live larvae feed for the white prawn Fenneropenaeus indicusReduction of Vibrio numbers in the water tank, better egg hatching rate and survival rate of the larvae[132]
Table 3. Antifungal activity from microalgae.
Table 3. Antifungal activity from microalgae.
Microalgae SpeciesAntifungal Compounds/FractionTarget MicroorganimsReferences
Green microalgae
Chlorella vulgarisMicroalgal supernatantYeast: Candida kefyr Mold: Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger[62]
Chlorococcum humicolaOrganic solvent extracts and pigments: beta carotene, Chlorophyll a and Chlorophyll bYeast: C. albicans Mold: A. flavus, A. niger[65]
Heterochlorella luteoviridisMicroalgal supernatantYeast: C. albicans[50]
Haematococcus pluvialisShort-chain fatty acidsYeast: C. albicans[70]
Scenedesmus quadricaudaOrganic solvent extractsYeast: C. albicans, S. cerevisiae Mold: A. flavus, A. niger, P. herquei Other: A. brassicae, F. moniliforme, Helminthosporium sp.[63]
Red microalgae
Porphyridium aerugineumPhycobiliproteinsYeast: C. albicans[72]
Porphyridium purpureumMicroalgal supernatantYeast: C. albicans[50]
Rhodella reticulataExopolysaccharidesYeast: C. albicans[72]
Chaetoceros lauderiPolysaccharidesMold: A. fumigatus, Blastomyces dermatitidis, Emmonsia parva, Madurella mycetomi, Sporothrix schenckii Dermatophyte: Epidermophyton floccosum, Microsporum audouini, Microsporum canis, Microsporum ferrugineum, Microsporum gypseum, Microsporum nanum, Microsporum persicolor, Trichophyton spp.[58,162,163]
Chaetoceros muelleriLipidic fractions: triglycerides, docosapentaenoic acid (DPA)Yeast: C. albicans[75]
Haslea karadagensisPurified pigment (intra- and extracellular forms)Corollospora maritima, Lulworthia sp., Dendryphiella salina[117]
Thalassiothrix frauenfeldiiculture filtrates and organic solvent extractsYeast: C. albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, Candida tropicalis, Cryptococcus neoformans Mold: A. niger[80]
Amphidinium sp.Polyols: karatungiols A(1)Mold: A. niger[164]
Gambierdiscus toxicusGambieric acids A and B formsMold: A. fumigatus, A. niger, Aspergillus oryzae, Penicillium citrinum, Penicillium chrysogenum, Paecilomyces variotii Dermatophyte: E. floccosum, T. mentagrophytes[165]
Goniodoma pseudogonyaulaxGoniodomin A (polyether macrolide)Yeast: C. albicans, C. neoformans, S. cerevisiae Mold: Penicillium sp. Dermatophyte: T. mentagrophytes[166,167]
Prorocentrum limaPolyethersYeast: Candida rugosa Mold: A. niger, Penicillium funiculosum[159]
Table 4. Antiviral activity from microalgae.
Table 4. Antiviral activity from microalgae.
Microalgae SpeciesAntiviral Compound and Cytotoxicity (μg/mL)Target VirusMechanism of Action and Efficiency (μg/mL)References
Green microalgae
Chlorella vulgarisPolysaccharide-rich fraction CC50 > 1600 (Vero cells)HSV-1Inhibits attachment, replication[201]
IC50 = 61
Dunaliella primolectaPheophorbide-like compound Not cytotoxic (Vero cells)HSV-1Inhibits adsorption, invasion[202]
MIC = 5 (totally inhibit the CPE)
Dunaliella salinaShort chain fatty acids, β-ionone, neophytadiene, phytol, palmitic and α-linolenic acids CC50 = 1711 (Vero cells)HSV-1Inhibits infectivity[203]
IC50 = 85
Haematococcus pluvialisPolysaccharide-rich fraction CC50 = 1867 (Vero cells)HSV-1Inhibits attachment, penetration, replication[203]
IC50 = 99
Red microalgae
Porphyridium cruentumSulphated exopolysaccharide Not cytotoxic at 100 (HeL cells) Inhibits penetration, replication[204]
HSV-1EC50 (HSV-1) = 34
HSV-2EC50 (HSV-2) = 12
VaccinaEC50 (Vaccina) = 12
Porphyridium purpureumExopolysaccharide Not cytotoxic at 500 (HEp-2 cells)VaccinaInteraction with free viral particles[205]
IC50 = 0.65
Porphyridium sp.Sulphated polysaccharide Not cytotoxic at 250 (Vero cells) and 2000 (in vivo in rats)HSV-1In vitro: inhibits adsorption, replication[200,206]
CPE50 = 1
In vivo: prevents the development of symptoms at 100
Inhibits adsorption, replication
HSV-2CPE50 (HSV-2) = 5
VZVCPE50 (VZV) = 0.7
Porphyridium sp.Purified polysaccharide Not cytotoxic at 1000 (NIH/3T3 cells)MuSV/MuLVInhibits the production of retroviruses in the cells[207]
RT50 reduction = 5
MuSV-124Inhibits cell transformation
ffu50 protection = 10
Haslea karadagensisPurified pigment: intra- and extracellular formsHSV-1Inhibits infection, cell destruction[117]
CC50 (Int) = 87EC50 (Int) = 62
CC50(Ext) > 200 (Vero cells)EC50 (Ext) = 23
Haslea ostreariaPurified pigment: intra- and extracellular formsHSV-1Inhibits infection, cell destruction[117]
CC50 (Int) > 200 (Vero cells)EC50 (Int) = 24
CC50 (Ext) = 107 (Vero cells)EC50 (Ext) = 27
Water soluble extract CC50 > 200 (Vero and MT-4 cells)HSV-1Inhibits replication[208]
EC50 = 14
Navicula directaSulphated polysaccharide: Naviculan Inhibits adhesion, penetration[209]
CC50 (HSV-1) = 3800 (Vero cells)HSV-1IC50 (HSV-1) = 14
CC50 (HSV-2) = 3800 (Vero cells)HSV-2IC50 (HSV-2) = 7.4
CC50 (IFV-A)= 5400 (MDCK cells)IFV-AIC50 (IFV-A) = 170
CC50 (HIV-1) = 4000 (HeLA cells)HIV-1IC50 (HIV-1) = 53
Cochlodinium polykrikoidesExtracellular sulphated polysaccharides: A1 and A2 Inhibits replication and the CPE[210]
CC50 (HIV-1) > 100 (MT-4 cells)HIV-1IC50 (HIV-1) = 1.7
CC50 (IFV-A) > 100 (MDCK cells)IFV-AIC50 (IFV-A) = 0.45–1
CC50 (IFV-B) > 100 (MDCK cells)IFV-BIC50 (IFV-B) = 7.1–8.3
CC50 (RSV-A) > 100 (Hep-2 cells)RSV-AIC50 (RSV-A) = 2–3
CC50 (RSV-B) > 100 (Hep-2 cells)RSV-BIC50 (RSV-B) = 0.8
A1HSV-1IC50 = 4.5
CC50 > 100 (HMV-2 cells)
A2PFluV-2IC50 = 0.8
CC50 > 100 (HMV-2 cells)
Gyrodinium impudicumPurified sulphated exopolysaccharide: p-KG03EMCVInhibits the development of the CPE, suppress tumor cell growth EC50 = 27[211]
CC50 = 3.4 (MT-4 cells)
CC50 = 59.9 (Vero cells)
CC50 > 1000 (HeLa cells)
Not in MDCK cells CC50 > 100 Inhibits adsorption[212]
IFV-AEC50 (IFV-A) = 0.19–0.48
IFV-BEC50 (IFV-B) = 0.26
EMCV: encephalomyocarditis virus; HIV-1: human immunodeficiency virus type 1; HSV-1: Herpes simplex virus type 1; HSV-2: herpes simplex virus type 2; IFV-A: influenza A virus; IFV-B: influenza B virus; MuLV: murine leukemia virus; MuSV-124: murine sarcoma virus; RSV: respiratory syncytial virus; VZV: varicella zoster virus. CC50: concentration that kills 50% of the infected cells; CPE50: concentration that offers 50% protection against the cytopathic effect; EC50: concentration requires to inhibit 50% of the virus-induced cytopathic effects (CPE); ffu50: concentration that offers 50% protection against the formation of foci of malignant cells; IC50: concentration that inhibits 50% of the virus infection; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration; RT50: concentration that offers 50% reduction of reverse transcriptase activity.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Falaise, C.; François, C.; Travers, M.-A.; Morga, B.; Haure, J.; Tremblay, R.; Turcotte, F.; Pasetto, P.; Gastineau, R.; Hardivillier, Y.; et al. Antimicrobial Compounds from Eukaryotic Microalgae against Human Pathogens and Diseases in Aquaculture. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 159.

AMA Style

Falaise C, François C, Travers M-A, Morga B, Haure J, Tremblay R, Turcotte F, Pasetto P, Gastineau R, Hardivillier Y, et al. Antimicrobial Compounds from Eukaryotic Microalgae against Human Pathogens and Diseases in Aquaculture. Marine Drugs. 2016; 14(9):159.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Falaise, Charlotte, Cyrille François, Marie-Agnès Travers, Benjamin Morga, Joël Haure, Réjean Tremblay, François Turcotte, Pamela Pasetto, Romain Gastineau, Yann Hardivillier, and et al. 2016. "Antimicrobial Compounds from Eukaryotic Microalgae against Human Pathogens and Diseases in Aquaculture" Marine Drugs 14, no. 9: 159.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop