Next Article in Journal
Unmasking Subclinical Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Speckle-Tracking Echocardiographic Study
Previous Article in Journal
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Older Adults: Integrating Cardiac Remodeling and Geriatric Syndromes—A Narrative Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Between Promise and Proof: Evaluating PRP’s Role in Modern Gynecology

by
Andreea Borislavschi
1,2 and
Aida Petca
1,2,*
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Eroii Sanitari Blvd., 050474 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elias University Emergency Hospital, 17 Mărăști Blvd., 050474 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2025, 61(9), 1514; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091514 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 9 July 2025 / Revised: 13 August 2025 / Accepted: 21 August 2025 / Published: 23 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Obstetrics and Gynecology)

Abstract

Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a promising regenerative therapy in various medical fields, including the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. PRP promotes regeneration by delivering a concentrated dose of platelets to damaged tissues, triggering healing mechanisms such as hemostasis, revascularization, and connective tissue regeneration through the release of growth factors. Despite evidence supporting the short- and medium-term benefits of PRP, its long-term efficacy remains unclear, largely due to the limited duration of follow-up in existing studies. Furthermore, the lack of standardized protocols for both preparation and administration of PRP poses a significant challenge to accurately assessing and comparing its sustained therapeutic outcomes. This literature review utilized comprehensive searches of PubMed and Google Scholar databases to analyze current evidence regarding PRP’s role in managing SUI in women. SUI, often resulting from weakened pubo-urethral ligament or intrinsic sphincter dysfunction due to childbirth, aging, or hormonal changes, significantly impacts quality of life. PRP offers a safe, minimally invasive, and cost-effective treatment option; however, further large-scale, well-designed studies are necessary to define optimal protocols and confirm long-term benefits. Advancing understanding of PRP therapy could substantially improve clinical management and patient quality of life in SUI.
Keywords: platelet-rich plasma; PRP; gynecology; menopause; stress urinary incontinence platelet-rich plasma; PRP; gynecology; menopause; stress urinary incontinence

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Borislavschi, A.; Petca, A. Between Promise and Proof: Evaluating PRP’s Role in Modern Gynecology. Medicina 2025, 61, 1514. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091514

AMA Style

Borislavschi A, Petca A. Between Promise and Proof: Evaluating PRP’s Role in Modern Gynecology. Medicina. 2025; 61(9):1514. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091514

Chicago/Turabian Style

Borislavschi, Andreea, and Aida Petca. 2025. "Between Promise and Proof: Evaluating PRP’s Role in Modern Gynecology" Medicina 61, no. 9: 1514. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091514

APA Style

Borislavschi, A., & Petca, A. (2025). Between Promise and Proof: Evaluating PRP’s Role in Modern Gynecology. Medicina, 61(9), 1514. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091514

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop