Next Article in Journal
Is Salvage Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Still a Viable Treatment Option in Relapsed Myeloma Patients?
Previous Article in Journal
The Dynamics of Seizures After Microsurgical Treatment of Brain AVMs in Patients with Symptomatic Epilepsy: A Single-Center Experience over 10 Years
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Baricitinib Mitigates Methotrexate-Induced Liver Fibrosis Model via YAP Pathway

1
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur 15030, Turkey
2
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir 35620, Turkey
3
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur 15030, Turkey
4
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University, Tekirdag 59010, Turkey
5
Department of Veterinary Surgery, Health Science Institute, Erciyes University, Kayseri 38280, Turkey
6
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri 38280, Turkey
7
Faculty of Medicine, BAMER, Biruni University, Istanbul 34015, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2025, 61(5), 857; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61050857
Submission received: 23 February 2025 / Revised: 24 April 2025 / Accepted: 4 May 2025 / Published: 6 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Liver fibrosis, a chronic process caused by various pathogenic factors, including drug toxicity, metabolic disorders, and chronic inflammation, is associated with liver-related mortality rates worldwide. It has been established that methotrexate (MTX), a pharmaceutical agent utilised in the treatment of numerous diseases, induces hepatic fibrosis. Currently, there is still a paucity of clinically efficacious antifibrotic drugs for the management of hepatic fibrosis. Thus, the present research sought to evaluate the antifibrotic effects of baricitinib in a rat model of MTX-induced liver fibrosis through the yes-associated protein (YAP) pathway. Materials and Methods: A total of 36 Wistar rats were assigned to three groups (n = 12) randomly: a control group, an MTX-induced liver fibrosis group, and a baricitinib-treated group, which received 20 mg/kg/day of baricitinib following fibrosis induction. All treatments were administered for 10 days. Results: Biochemical analyses revealed significant increases in plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT), cytokeratin-18 (CK-18), and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, as well as liver transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), YAP1, and MDA levels, in the MTX-induced fibrosis group in comparison to the control group (p < 0.05). Notably, baricitinib addition significantly reduced these biomarkers (p < 0.05). A histopathological evaluation further confirmed a marked reduction in fibrosis, hepatic necrosis, and cellular infiltration in the baricitinib-treated group relative to the MTX-induced fibrosis group. Conclusions: Accordingly, our findings suggest that baricitinib mitigates MTX-induced liver fibrosis, potentially through its anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects mediated by the suppression of the YAP signalling pathway. These results highlight that baricitinib could be a potential treatment option for patients with liver fibrosis.

1. Introduction

Liver fibrosis is described as the pathological deposition of the extracellular matrix in hepatic tissue, resulting from a sustained injury–repair process that ultimately disrupts the liver architecture and impairs its activity [1]. The morbidity and mortality of liver fibrosis are significant worldwide, with an increasing prevalence each year [2]. Fibrosis is a characteristic of advanced liver disease and a precursor to severe disorders, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma [3].
Methotrexate (MTX), a widely used antifolate drug, is prescribed for the therapy of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, including psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis [4,5,6,7]. However, despite its therapeutic benefits, MTX has been associated with hepatotoxicity, and long-term administration, even at low doses, has been reported to induce hepatic fibrosis [8,9,10,11], thus posing a significant clinical challenge. Previous research has suggested that MTX-triggered liver damage is largely driven by oxidative stress, which aggravates liver injury via inflammation, cell death, and mitochondrial dysfunction [12,13,14]. Methotrexate has been shown to inhibit nicotinamide adenosine diphosphate (NADP)-dependent dehydrogenase and malic enzymes, disrupting the cellular redox balance. Nicotinamide adenosine diphosphate is a crucial cytosolic antioxidant required for the activity of glutathione reductase, an enzyme that protects cells from oxidative damage. Consequently, a decline in NADP levels renders hepatocytes vulnerable to injury from reactive oxygen species [8,15,16,17,18]. Numerous drugs are utilised to mitigate MTX-induced hepatotoxicity [19,20,21]; however, their efficacy in preventing hepatic fibrosis remains limited in humans [22,23].
Baricitinib, a targeted Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 suppressor with potent anti-inflammatory properties, has been authorised for the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis and related inflammatory conditions [24]. Recent studies have demonstrated its efficacy in alleviating fibrosis in pulmonary, dermal, and cardiac tissues [25,26]. Despite these promising findings, the potential antifibrotic effects of baricitinib in liver fibrosis remain unexplored. Considering this, the present research was conducted to investigate the protective role of baricitinib in an MTX-induced hepatic fibrosis model in rats, with a particular focus on its modulation of the YAP signalling pathway.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

The present research utilised thirty-six female Wistar albino rats, with a body mass range of 150–200 g and an age range of 10–12 weeks. Baseline data on the body weights and ages of the rats in each group are presented in Table 1. The animals were procured from the Experimental Animal Centre of Demiroglu Scientific University. The rats were housed in steel cages and provided with unrestricted access to a standard chow diet (comprising 35% fat, 18% protein, and 47% carbohydrates) and water within a temperature-controlled (22 ± 2 °C) environment that was subject to a 12 h light/dark cycle. The experiments conducted in this study were executed in accordance with the guidelines stipulated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, as outlined by the National Institutes of Health in the USA. The experiments were conducted only after obtaining ethical permission from the Animal Ethics Committee of Demiroglu Science University (Ethical number: 325011204, 15 January 2023). Unless otherwise stated, all chemicals were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich Inc., Munich, Germany.

2.2. Experimental Design

A total of 36 female Wistar rats were randomly allocated to three groups (n = 12). The first group represented the control group and did not undergo any chemical treatment. The second and third group rats were administered a single intraperitoneal (IP) injection of MTX (20 mg/kg) to trigger hepatic injury. Following MTX administration, the third group rats were administered baricitinib (20 mg/kg/day) by IP injection, while the second group was treated with 1 mL/kg/day of 0.9% NaCl saline via the same route. All interventions were administered for a period of 10 days.
Upon completion of the experiment, all animals were euthanised by cervical dislocation following high-dose anaesthesia induced by ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (50 mg/kg) (Ketasol, Richterpharma AG, Austria; Rompun, Bayer, Germany), in accordance with the AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals. Samples of blood were obtained from the rats through cardiac puncture for a biochemical analysis. The hepatic tissue was then dissected for further assessment by histopathology and biochemistry.

2.3. Biochemical Analysis of ALT and CK-18 Levels in Plasma

The measurement of plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) levels was conducted via a commercially sourced ELISA kit provided by USCN Life Science Inc., Wuhan, China.

2.4. Lipid Peroxidation Analysis of Plasma

The quantification of lipid peroxidation in tissue and plasma specimens was evaluated by determining malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARSs), in accordance with the methodology outlined by Taskin et al. [14]. In summary, trichloroacetic acid and TBARS reagent were introduced to the tissue samples and then mixed and incubated at 100 °C for 60 min. After being chilled on ice, the samples were subjected to centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 20 min. The optical density of the supernatants was then measured at a 535 nm wavelength. The MDA concentrations in the tissue samples were determined through a reference calibration curve prepared with tetraethoxypropane and are presented as nmol per gram of protein.

2.5. Biochemical Assessment of TGF-Beta and YAP1 in Liver Tissue

Post-decapitation, the livers were swiftly excised and stored at −20 °C until further analysis. Liver tissue samples were homogenised with a glass homogeniser in a fivefold volume of phosphate-buffered saline adjusted to pH 7.4 for a biochemical analysis. The homogenates were then exposed to centrifugation at 5000 g for a period of 15 min. The resultant clear upper layer was harvested, and the total protein concentration in the liver homogenates was assessed using Bradford’s method, with bovine serum albumin as the reference [27].
The concentrations of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) and yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) in the liver supernatants were quantified using commercially sourced rat-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). All samples were analysed in two independent measurements following the manufacturer’s protocols. Absorbance values were obtained via a microplate reader (Multiscan Go, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Portsmouth, NH, USA).

2.6. Histological Analysis

Formalin-fixed liver tissue samples (4 μm) were subjected to haematoxylin and eosin staining, and imaging was conducted using an Olympus C-5050 digital imaging system attached to an Olympus BX51 microscope (Olympus Co., Tokyo, Japan).
A Liver histopathological evaluation was performed according to the methodology outlined by Lobenhofer et al. [28]. The evaluation was quantified by summing the individual scores assigned to each liver section parameter (hepatocyte necrosis, fibrosis, and cellular infiltration) using a grading scale of 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (marked).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 15.0. Parametric variables were evaluated using Student’s t-test or an analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Nonparametric variables were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Ordinal data are presented as median (range). Statistically significant results were accepted as those with p < 0.05, and markedly statistically significant results were accepted as those with p < 0.001.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Baricitinib on Biochemical Parameters

In the rats treated with MTX and saline, there was a significant elevation in plasma ALT (p < 0.01), CK-18 (p < 0.001), and MDA (p < 0.001) levels, along with increased hepatic TGF-β (p < 0.01), YAP1 (p < 0.01), and MDA (p < 0.001) levels, in comparison to the control group. However, the administration of baricitinib markedly reduced plasma ALT (p < 0.05), CK-18 (p < 0.001), and MDA (p < 0.05) levels, as well as hepatic TGF-β (p < 0.05), YAP1 (p < 0.05), and MDA (p < 0.001) levels, in the MTX-induced fibrosis group (Table 2).

3.2. Effect of Baricitinib on Histopathological Parameters

The histopathological evaluation indicated significant morphological differences among the experimental groups. In the control group, the liver exhibited a normal histological structure with well-organised hepatocytes and intact central veins and portal areas. In contrast, the MTX and saline-treated group demonstrated severe histopathological damage in the portal area, characterised by hepatic necrosis, fibrosis, and marked cellular infiltration. Notably, in the rats treated with MTX + baricitinib, a considerable reduction in these pathological changes was observed (Figure 1).
The histopathological analysis showed that there was a considerable reduction (p < 0.01) in liver fibrosis, hepatic necrosis, and cellular infiltration in the baricitinib-supplemented group in comparison to the methotrexate-induced liver fibrosis group (Table 3).

4. Discussion

Liver fibrosis is a consequence of advanced hepatic damage caused by various factors, including diseases or side effects of therapeutical drugs, and its prevalence is increasing globally [2,3]. Methotrexate is an agent known to cause histological changes in the liver, including hepatic necrosis, fibrosis, and increased cellular infiltration, as side effects of treating disorders such as psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis [5,6,7,29,30]. Various pharmacological agents have been utilised to alleviate the adverse effects of MTX [19,20,21]; however, their effectiveness in preventing hepatic fibrosis remains limited in humans [22,23]. Based on this information, the present study investigated the biochemical and histopathological effects of baricitinib, an anti-inflammatory agent, in a methotrexate-induced liver fibrosis model via the modulation of the YAP pathway.
Alanine aminotransferase is a key biomarker of liver injury, reflecting hepatocellular damage and necrosis [31]. In accordance with the findings of earlier studies [30,32,33], we observed a considerable elevation in plasma ALT levels in response to MTX administration, indicative of hepatotoxicity. Importantly, baricitinib supplementation contributed to a considerable reduction in plasma ALT levels, further supporting its protective effects in mitigating MTX-induced hepatic damage.
Cytokeratin-18, a fundamental intermediate filament protein in liver cells, is a primary caspase substrate during hepatic cell death and plays a key role in hepatic injury. Moreover, plasma CK-18 is highly specific for detecting fibrosis [34]. Consistent with this, rats with MTX-induced liver fibrosis were found to have increased CK-18 levels in the present study. The addition of baricitinib reduced the CK-18 levels in these fibrosis-induced rats, suggesting that baricitinib may exert hepatoprotective effects by attenuating hepatocyte apoptosis and preserving liver integrity.
As shown in previous studies [35,36,37], MTX administration elevates serum and tissue MDA levels in rats, a key marker of lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress. Consistent with these findings, our study demonstrated a considerable elevation in MDA levels in both plasma and liver tissue following MTX treatment in comparison to the control group. However, baricitinib administration effectively reduced MDA levels, indicating a potential antioxidant role in mitigating oxidative stress-associated liver injury.
Transforming growth factor-beta is a key fibrogenic cytokine involved in the progression of chronic liver disease, contributing to fibrosis development by promoting hepatic stellate cell activation and extracellular matrix deposition [38]. Our results demonstrated that MTX treatment led to elevated liver TGF-β levels, further confirming its role in fibrosis progression. However, baricitinib supplementation significantly suppressed TGF-β expression, suggesting its potential antifibrotic activity, likely through the modulation of inflammatory and fibrotic signalling pathways.
Recent studies have emphasised the function of the Hippo pathway in fibrosis in different tissues, notably in the lung [39], liver [40,41,42,43,44], kidney [45], and heart [46]. Yes-associated protein 1 is a key mediator of the Hippo pathway and plays a crucial role in hepatic stellate cell stimulation, a key process in the initiation and progression of hepatic fibrosis [47]. Consistent with these findings, this study demonstrated that MTX-induced liver fibrosis was related to elevated liver YAP1 expression. Notably, baricitinib supplementation reduced YAP1 levels in fibrotic rats, suggesting that its antifibrotic effects may be mediated via the inhibition of the YAP1 pathway.
A histopathological analysis showed that there was a significant reduction in liver fibrosis, hepatic necrosis, and cellular infiltration in the baricitinib-supplemented group in comparison to the methotrexate-induced liver fibrosis group. The presence of bridging necrosis and fibrosis in the MTX-treated group aligns with previous research [13,14] reporting MTX-induced hepatotoxicity. MTX is known to induce liver injury through oxidative stress and inflammatory pathways [36,37]. In our study, the attenuation of fibrosis and necrosis in the baricitinib-treated group suggests a potential hepatoprotective role of this drug, likely mediated through its anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic properties. By inhibiting the JAK/STAT signalling pathway, baricitinib may suppress pro-inflammatory cytokine activity, thereby reducing tissue damage. However, further biochemical and molecular analyses are warranted to elucidate the precise processes responsible for the hepatoprotective effects of baricitinib.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this research revealed the biochemical and histopathological advantages of oral baricitinib administration in a model of MTX-induced hepatic fibrosis in rats. The findings indicate that baricitinib reduced plasma ALT, CK-18, and MDA levels, as well as liver TGF-β, YAP1, and MDA levels. Moreover, a histological analysis verified a considerable decline in hepatic necrosis, fibrosis, and cellular infiltration. Collectively, these observations suggest that baricitinib provides partial protection against MTX-induced hepatic injury, indicating its potential relevance in future therapeutic approaches. However, further studies are required to validate the findings and investigate the fundamental molecular pathways of baricitinib in liver fibrosis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, M.U., M.A.E. and O.E.; data curation, M.U., M.A.E., and O.E.; formal analysis, M.U., M.A.E. and O.E.; investigation, M.U., M.A.E., O.S. and O.E.; methodology, M.U., M.A.E. and O.E.; writing—original draft preparation, M.U., M.A.E., O.S., Z.D., B.B.C., G.A. and O.E.; writing—review and editing, M.U., M.A.E., O.S., Z.D., B.B.C., G.A. and O.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Ethical Committee of the University of Science University (protocol code 325011204, 15 January 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data obtained from this study are included in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Boyer-Diaz, Z.; Aristu-Zabalza, P.; Andrés-Rozas, M.; Robert, C.; Ortega-Ribera, M.; Fernández-Iglesias, A.; Broqua, P.; Junien, J.L.; Wettstein, G.; Bosch, J.; et al. Pan-PPAR agonist lanifibranor improves portal hypertension and hepatic fibrosis in experimental advanced chronic liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2021, 74, 1188–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Caballeria, L.; Pera, G.; Arteaga, I.; Rodríguez, L.; Alumà, A.; Morillas, R.M.; de la Ossa, N.; Díaz, A.; Expósito, C.; Miranda, D.; et al. High prevalence of liver fibrosis among European adults with unknown liver disease: A population-based study. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 16, 1138–1145.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vilar-Gomez, E.; Calzadilla-Bertot, L.; Wai-Sun, W.V.; Castellanos, M.; Aller-de, L.F.R.; Metwally, M.; Eslam, M.; Gonzalez-Fabian, L.; Sanz, M.A.-Q.; Conde-Martín, A.F.; et al. Fibrosis severity as a determinant of cause-specific mortality in patients with advanced nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A multi-national cohort study. Gastroenterology 2018, 155, 443–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Langford, C.A. Management of systemic vasculitis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2001, 15, 281–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Feagan, B.G.; Alfadhli, A. Methotrexate in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am. 2004, 33, 407–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, J.J.; Schiff, K.R. Sarcoidosis. Am. Fam. Physician 2004, 70, 312–322. [Google Scholar]
  7. Naldi, L.; Griffiths, C.E. Traditional therapies in the management of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: An assessment of the benefits and risks. Br. J. Dermatol. 2005, 152, 597–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. ter Borg, E.J.; Seldenrijk, C.A.; Timmer, R. Liver cirrhosis due to methotrexate in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Neth. J. Med. 1996, 49, 244–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bangert, C.A.; Costner, M.I. Methotrexate in dermatology. Dermatol. Ther. 2007, 20, 216–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Holliday, A.C.; Moody, M.N.; Berlingeri-Ramos, A. Methotrexate: Role of treatment in skin disease. Skin Ther. Lett. 2013, 18, 4–9. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ezhilarasan, D. Hepatotoxic potentials of methotrexate: Understanding the possible toxicological molecular mechanisms. Toxicology 2021, 458, 152840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Friedman, S.L. Hepatic stellate cells: Protean, multifunctional, and enigmatic cells of the liver. Physiol. Rev. 2008, 88, 125–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Uraz, S.; Tahan, V.; Aygun, C.; Eren, F.; Unluguzel, G.; Yuksel, M.; Senturk, O.; Avsar, E.; Haklar, G.; Celikel, C.; et al. Role of ursodeoxycholic acid in prevention of methotrexate-induced liver toxicity. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2008, 53, 1071–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Taskin, B.; Erdoğan, M.A.; Yiğittürk, G.; Günenç, D.; Erbaş, O. Antifibrotic effect of lactulose on a methotrexate-induced liver injury model. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2017, 2017, 7942531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vogel, W.H.; Snyder, R.; Schulman, M.P. The inhibition of dehydrogenases by folic acid and several of its analogs. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1963, 10, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lucas, M.; Solano, F. Coelenterazine is a superoxide anion-sensitive chemiluminescent probe: Its usefulness in the assay of respiratory burst in neutrophils. Anal. Biochem. 1992, 206, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Videla, L.A.; Correa, L.; Rivera, M.; Sir, T. Zymosan-induced luminol-amplified chemiluminescence of whole blood phagocytes in experimental and human hyperthyroidism. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1993, 14, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Van Dyke, K.; Patel, S.; Vallyathan, V. Lucigenin chemiluminescence assay as an adjunctive tool for assessment of various stages of inflammation: A study of quiescent inflammatory cells. J. Biosci. 2003, 28, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Verma, S.; Kaplowitz, N. Diagnosis, management and prevention of drug-induced liver injury. Gut 2009, 58, 1555–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abo-Haded, H.M.; Elkablawy, M.A.; Al-Johani, Z.; Al-Ahmadi, O.; El-Agamy, D.S. Hepatoprotective effect of sitagliptin against methotrexate-induced liver toxicity. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mehrzadi, S.; Fatemi, I.; Esmaeilizadeh, M.; Ghaznavi, H.; Kalantar, H.; Goudarzi, M. Hepatoprotective effect of berberine against methotrexate-induced liver toxicity in rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 97, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Heyens, L.; Busschots, D.; Koek, G.H.; Robaeys, G.; Francque, S. Liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: From liver biopsy to non-invasive biomarkers in diagnosis and treatment. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 615978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shan, L.; Wang, F.; Zhai, D.; Meng, X.; Liu, J.; Lv, X. New drugs for hepatic fibrosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 874408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Al-Salama, Z.T.; Scott, L.J. Baricitinib: A review in rheumatoid arthritis. Drugs 2018, 78, 761–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gu, S.; Liang, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; Miao, Y.; Wei, Y.; Li, S.; Gu, J.; Cui, Y.; Xiao, T.; et al. Baricitinib attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice by inhibiting TGF-β1 signaling pathway. Medicina 2023, 28, 2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hou, Z.; Su, X.; Han, G. JAK1/2 inhibitor baricitinib improves skin fibrosis and digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 859330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lobenhofer, E.K.; Boorman, G.A.; Phillips, K.L.; Heinloth, A.N.; Malarkey, D.E.; Blackshear, P.E.; Houle, C.; Hurban, P. Application of visualization tools to the analysis of histopathological data enhances biological insight and interpretation. Toxicol. Pathol. 2006, 34, 921–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sener, G.; Eksioglu-Demiralp, E.; Cetiner, M.; Ercan, F.; Yegen, B.C. Betaglucan ameliorates methotrexate-induced oxidative organ injury via its antioxidant and immunomodulatory effects. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 542, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dalaklioglu, S.; Genc, G.E.; Aksoy, N.H.; Akcit, F.; Gumuslu, S. Resveratrol ameliorates methotrexate-induced hepatotoxicity in rats via inhibition of lipid peroxidation. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2013, 32, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rosen, H.R.; Keeffe, E.B. Evaluation of abnormal liver enzymes, use of liver test, and the serology of viral hepatitis. In Liver Disease Diagnosis and Management; Bacon, B.R., Di Bisceglie, A.M., Eds.; Churchill: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 24–35. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bozkurt, M.; Bodakci, M.N.; Turkcu, G.; Kuyumcu, M.; Akkurt, M.; Sula, B.; Em, S.; Oktayoglu, P.; Batmaz, I.; Yüksel, H. Protective effects of carvacrol against methotrexate-induced liver toxicity in rats. Acta Chir. Belg. 2014, 114, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tunali-Akbay, T.; Sehirli, O.; Ercan, F.; Sener, G. Resveratrol protects against methotrexate-induced hepatic injury in rats. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 13, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cusi, K.; Chang, Z.; Harrison, S.; Lomonaco, R.; Bril, F.; Orsak, B.; Ortiz-Lopez, C.; Hecht, J.; Feldstein, A.E.; Webb, A.; et al. Limited value of plasma cytokeratin-18 as a biomarker for NASH and fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2014, 60, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jahovic, N.; Cevik, H.; Sehirli, A.O.; Yeğen, B.C.; Sener, G. Melatonin prevents methotrexate-induced hepatorenal oxidative injury in rats. J. Pineal Res. 2003, 34, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hadi, N.R.; Al-Amran, F.G.; Swadi, A. Metformin ameliorates methotrexate-induced hepatotoxicity. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother. 2012, 3, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Elsawy, H.; Algefare, A.I.; Alfwuaires, M.; Khalil, M.; Elmenshawy, O.M.; Sedky, A.; Abdel-Moneim, A.M. Naringin alleviates methotrexate-induced liver injury in male albino rats and enhances its antitumor efficacy in HepG2 cells. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, BSR20193686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dooley, S.; Ten Dijke, P. TGF-β in progression of liver disease. Cell Tissue Res. 2012, 347, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Haak, A.J.; Kostallari, E.; Sicard, D.; Ligresti, G.; Choi, K.M.; Caporarello, N.; Jones, D.L.; Tan, Q.; Meridew, J.; Diaz Espinosa, A.M.; et al. Selective YAP/TAZ inhibition in fibroblasts via dopamine receptor D1 agonism reverses fibrosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaau6296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yu, H.X.; Yao, Y.; Bu, F.T.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, S.; He, Z. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species-regulated Nrf2 and apoptosis induction protect against mitochondrial dysfunction in methotrexate-induced hepatotoxicity. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021, 893, 173818. [Google Scholar]
  41. Alsamman, S.; Christenson, S.A.; Yu, A.; Ayad, N.M.E.; Mooring, M.S.; Segal, J.M.; Hu, J.K.; Schaub, J.R.; Ho, S.S.; Rao, V.; et al. Targeting acid ceramidase inhibits YAP/TAZ signaling to reduce fibrosis in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020, 12, eaay8798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mooring, M.; Fowl, B.H.; Lum, S.Z.C.; Liu, Y.; Yao, K.; Softic, S.; Kirchner, R.; Bernstein, A.; Singhi, A.D.; Jay, D.G.; et al. Hepatocyte stress increases expression of Yes-associated protein and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif in hepatocytes to promote parenchymal inflammation and fibrosis. Hepatology 2020, 71, 1813–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, X.; Cai, B.; Yang, X.; Sonubi, O.O.; Zheng, Z.; Ramakrishnan, R.; Shi, H.; Valenti, L.; Pajvani, U.B.; Sandhu, J.; et al. Cholesterol stabilizes TAZ in hepatocytes to promote experimental non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 2020, 31, 969–986.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, C.; Zhang, R.; Zhan, Y.; Zheng, J. Resveratrol inhibits hepatic stellate cell activation via the Hippo pathway. Mediat. Inflamm. 2021, 2021, 3399357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gui, Y.; Li, J.; Lu, Q.; Feng, Y.; Wang, M.; He, W.; Yang, J.; Dai, C. Yap/Taz mediates mTORC2-stimulated fibroblast activation and kidney fibrosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 16364–16375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Francisco, J.; Zhang, Y.; Jeong, J.I.; Mizushima, W.; Ikeda, S.; Ivessa, A.; Oka, S.; Zhai, P.; Tallquist, M.D.; Del Re, D.P. Blockade of fibroblast YAP attenuates cardiac fibrosis and dysfunction through MRTF-A inhibition. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2020, 5, 931–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mannaerts, I.; Leite, S.B.; Verhulst, S.; Claerhout, S.; Eysackers, N.; Thoen, L.F.; Hoorens, A.; Reynaert, H.; Halder, G.; van Grunsven, L.A. The Hippo pathway effector YAP controls mouse hepatic stellate cell activation. J. Hepatol. 2015, 63, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of baricitinib on hepatocytes. Haematoxylin–eosin staining of tissue samples from rat liver (10× and 20× magnification). (A,B) Control group; CV: central vein; pa: portal area; (C,D) MTX (20 mg/kg) and saline group (1 mL/kg/day of 0.9% NaCl), arrow indicates reduction in bridging necrosis, fibrosis, and cellular infiltration in pa; (E,F) MTX (20 mg/kg) and baricitinib (20 mg/kg/day) group.
Figure 1. Effect of baricitinib on hepatocytes. Haematoxylin–eosin staining of tissue samples from rat liver (10× and 20× magnification). (A,B) Control group; CV: central vein; pa: portal area; (C,D) MTX (20 mg/kg) and saline group (1 mL/kg/day of 0.9% NaCl), arrow indicates reduction in bridging necrosis, fibrosis, and cellular infiltration in pa; (E,F) MTX (20 mg/kg) and baricitinib (20 mg/kg/day) group.
Medicina 61 00857 g001
Table 1. Baseline body weights and ages of rats in each group (mean ± SD).
Table 1. Baseline body weights and ages of rats in each group (mean ± SD).
GroupBody Weight (g)Age (Weeks)
Control176.5 ± 9.411.2 ± 0.4
MTX + Saline178.1 ± 10.211.3 ± 0.5
MTX + Baricitinib177.3 ± 8.911.1 ± 0.6
Table 2. Effects of baricitinib on plasma and liver biochemical markers in rats.
Table 2. Effects of baricitinib on plasma and liver biochemical markers in rats.
ControlMTX + SalineMTX + Baricitinib
Liver TGF-β level (pg/g)0.58 ± 0.22.6 ± 0.1 *1.15 ± 0.1 #
Liver MDA level (nmol/g tissue)30.8 ± 0.668.2 ± 3.5 **45.4 ± 1.8 ##
Liver YAP1 level (pg/g) 635.1 ± 4.6958.2 ± 2.4 *715.9 ± 1.8 #
Plasma cytokeratin-18 level (ng/mL)1.2 ± 0.12.75 ± 0.6 **1.9 ± 0.3 ##
Plasma MDA level (nM)32.5 ± 1.8122.4 ± 6.5 **106.8 ± 3.1 #
Plasma ALT (IU/L)16.5 ± 0.844.2 ± 1.5 *32.3 ± 1.6 #
Data are presented as mean ± SD. Control group: standard chow diet; MTX + saline group: MTX (20 mg/kg) and saline (1 mL/kg/day of 0.9% NaCl); MTX + baricitinib group: MTX (20 mg/kg) and baricitinib (20 mg/kg/day). * p < 0.01 and ** p < 0.001 indicate differences from the control group; # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.001 indicate differences from the MTX + saline-treated group.
Table 3. Effect of baricitinib on morphometric histological grading of hepatic necrosis, fibrosis, and cellular infiltration.
Table 3. Effect of baricitinib on morphometric histological grading of hepatic necrosis, fibrosis, and cellular infiltration.
Control MTX + Saline MTX + Baricitinib
Hepatic necrosis0 [0–1]2 [2,3] *1 [0–2] #
Fibrosis 0 [0–1]2 [1,2,3] *1 [0–2] #
Cellular infiltration0 [0–1]2 [1,2,3] *1 [0–2] #
Data are expressed as median [minimum–maximum]. Control group: standard chow diet; MTX + saline group: MTX (20 mg/kg) and saline (1 mL/kg/day of 0.9% NaCl); MTX + baricitinib group: MTX (20 mg/kg) and baricitinib (20 mg/kg/day). * p < 0.001 indicates considerable differences from the control group; # p < 0.001 denotes considerable differences from the MTX + saline group.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ulusan, M.; Erdogan, M.A.; Simsek, O.; Dogan, Z.; Ciftci, B.B.; Atalan, G.; Erbas, O. Baricitinib Mitigates Methotrexate-Induced Liver Fibrosis Model via YAP Pathway. Medicina 2025, 61, 857. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61050857

AMA Style

Ulusan M, Erdogan MA, Simsek O, Dogan Z, Ciftci BB, Atalan G, Erbas O. Baricitinib Mitigates Methotrexate-Induced Liver Fibrosis Model via YAP Pathway. Medicina. 2025; 61(5):857. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61050857

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ulusan, Mehmet, Mumin Alper Erdogan, Ozkan Simsek, Zafer Dogan, Bertug Bekir Ciftci, Gultekin Atalan, and Oytun Erbas. 2025. "Baricitinib Mitigates Methotrexate-Induced Liver Fibrosis Model via YAP Pathway" Medicina 61, no. 5: 857. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61050857

APA Style

Ulusan, M., Erdogan, M. A., Simsek, O., Dogan, Z., Ciftci, B. B., Atalan, G., & Erbas, O. (2025). Baricitinib Mitigates Methotrexate-Induced Liver Fibrosis Model via YAP Pathway. Medicina, 61(5), 857. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61050857

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop