Next Article in Journal
Alterations in Gut Microbiota After Upper Gastrointestinal Resections: Should We Implement Screening to Prevent Complications?
Previous Article in Journal
Oncological Safety of Intrauterine Manipulator Use in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current and Emerging Approaches in the Management of Severe Ocular Surface Disease

by
Sandeep K. Dhallu
1,*,
Molly J. Pritchard
2,
David Y. S. Chau
2 and
Stewart B. Kirton
1
1
Clinical Pharmaceutical and Biological Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK
2
Division of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2025, 61(10), 1819; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101819 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 6 August 2025 / Revised: 25 September 2025 / Accepted: 3 October 2025 / Published: 11 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)

Abstract

Ocular surface disorders such as dry eye disease are an increasingly encountered ophthalmic disorder, in which signs and symptoms can vary significantly from one patient to the next. Severe dry eye can be a challenge for the ophthalmic practitioner to manage. Contemporary management options are wide-ranging and include topical treatments, contact lenses, and surgical options. More recently, newer stem cell-based therapies have emerged, and early reports have shown promising outcomes. Meanwhile, other novel approaches, such as the eggshell membrane, are currently in development, and while no studies have yet reported on its use in ophthalmic applications, further developments in this area are expected. However, longer-term studies are needed in order to fully assess the safety and efficacy of these newer treatments. There are an increasing number of treatment options available for ocular surface disorders. This article provides an overview of some of the current treatment options that are available for severe ocular surface disorders, including dry eye disease, as well as insight into applications that are currently in development, which may show potential in the future.

1. Introduction

Disorders that affect the cornea, limbus, conjunctiva, eyelids, eyelashes, lacrimal apparatus, or tear film are considered to be ocular surface diseases. These can encompass a wide variety of conditions ranging from those that are mild to others that are classed as severe. For instance, Stevens–Johnson syndrome can affect the whole ocular surface, including the corneal and conjunctival epithelial stem cells [1]. Dry eye disease [DED] is a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface [2], whose signs and symptoms can vary greatly across a spectrum, and studies suggest that its prevalence is growing [3].
DED may arise for many different reasons, including underlying inflammation, a deficiency, as a side effect of medication, or from meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), as well as others. Some biological anti-cancer treatments have been linked to ocular side effects, with the most common being those affecting the ocular anterior segment [4,5,6]. Chemical injury can cause serious damage to the eye, including sight loss, with young males aged 16–25 years old working in industry accounting for the bulk of reported cases [7]. Chemical burns can also cause dry eye as well as keratinisation of the ocular surface, and in specific situations such as this, the DED requires treatment first; otherwise, ocular surface repair options may not provide a sustained benefit [8].
There are many different therapeutic strategies for the treatment of dry eye, and the most appropriate management depends upon its severity. As we gain a deeper understanding of the multifactorial mechanisms that lead to its development, there is a greater focus on treating the underlying source of the disorder. This article will summarise some of the most commonly used management approaches for the treatment of more severe forms of DED and ocular surface disorders. Furthermore, new and emerging areas of research that show promise in providing a safe and effective treatment option for severe ocular surface disorders will be discussed.

2. Current and Emerging Management Strategies

2.1. Topical

Topical treatments such as lubricating eye drops are usually the first line of treatment, especially in mild-to-moderate cases of dry eye. In more severe cases, topically applied immunosuppressive agents like corticosteroids and immunomodulatory agents such as cyclosporin have been shown to help improve the corneal epithelium, possibly as a result of a decrease in inflammation. Topical cyclosporin A may increase tear production as well as goblet cell density [9]. However, corticosteroid use may be limited due to the associated side effects of raised intraocular pressure, cataracts, and irritation [10,11,12,13].
Autologous serum drops, which are derived from a patient’s own blood, have been developed in order to treat more severe forms of dry eye; however, these come with both benefits as well as limitations. They contain growth factors that promote epithelial healing [14], which lubricating eye drops do not contain, and so have been suggested as being more beneficial for severe forms of DED. However, they are more challenging to prepare, with no universally agreed method for this, and difficult to dispense and store, with contamination risk being an additional factor contributing to their lack of widespread adoption by clinicians [13], as well as being a more costly option for the patient [15]. Blood-derived products have been used successfully for Sjögren's syndrome for 40 years [16]; however, due to the presence of pro-inflammatory factors, the use of allogeneic serum may be a better alternative [17]; however, larger-scale studies are required to investigate their utility further.
The use of whole blood for DED involves the patient undergoing a finger prick to extract a small drop of blood which is then used as a treatment, and when used alongside conventional dry eye therapy was found to improve OSDI scores with no reported adverse effects [18] and improved corneal staining, TBUT, as well as ocular comfort scores [19]. It is a cost-effective and readily available technique, although drawbacks may include patient unwillingness to perform a finger prick multiple times a day [13].

2.2. Plasma Rich in Growth Factors [PRGF]

Natural tears have a complex composition and are made up of water, salts, protein and glycoproteins, minor hydrocarbons, lipids, as well as regulatory enzymes and nutrients, proteins, and antimicrobial agents. Eye drops that have been derived from a patient’s own blood have been shown to be effective in treating many ocular surface disorders, having first been applied on the eye nearly fifty years ago [16,20]. Autologous serum [AS] drops were the first blood-derived product used but came with many drawbacks, as detailed above. Plasma rich in growth factors [PRGF] is a platelet-rich plasma with many biological and antimicrobial properties. Some have found PRGF to be more effective than AS in the treatment of moderate-to-severe ocular surface diseases, including dry eye [21,22,23], while others have found no significant difference in outcome measures like OSDI scores, TBUT, and ocular surface staining [24].

2.3. Punctal Plugs

Punctal plugs were introduced fifty years ago [25] and work by occluding the punctum, thereby reducing tear drainage in order to retain more moisture at the ocular surface. They are inserted into the punctal ducts in a simple and safe procedure that is reversible [26]. They are recommended for those with more severe forms of dry eye disease, for whom lubricating eye drops are no longer providing effective relief. They have been found to improve symptoms and reduce the use of artificial tears as well as improve the health of the ocular surface. They are a cost-effective treatment option [27] and can be combined with other topical treatments [28]. They are contraindicated in patients with an allergy to the plug material, ectropion, and active ocular infection. Any inflammation, such as that of the lids in blepharitis, should be treated first [14], as the use of punctal plugs on an inflamed ocular surface may lead to toxic tear syndrome [29].
Potential complications include epiphora, foreign body sensation, and local pain/irritation, but this has generally been found to be minimal [26,30]. The development of new materials and designs has helped to improve patient tolerance to punctal plugs, as well as increase their efficacy and reduce the rate of complications [29]. Other issues include potential loss via migration into the lacrimal passageway, although this is uncommon [29,31,32]. Punctal cauterization is an effective option for those who repeatedly lose punctal plugs and can be performed relatively easily in a clinical setting without major complications [33].

2.4. Therapeutic Contact Lenses

Contact lenses can play an important role in the management of severe DED as well as in the protection and maintenance of the ocular surface. Soft contact lenses are most commonly used to correct refractive errors; however, they can also be used therapeutically. For example, they may be used to help with the healing of the cornea following injury, burn, or surgery or they may be used to protect the ocular surface from damage in conditions such as trichiasis. Silicone hydrogel lenses can help promote healing following chemical injury [34]. Bandage contact lenses have also been used following cataract surgery to help with wound healing and to improve patient comfort; they have been found to decrease dry eye symptoms and improve OSDI scores [35,36]. A further benefit of bandage contact lenses is in maintaining corneal hydration following keratoprosthesis by stabilising the tear film [37,38]. Contact lenses have also been found to be effective in sealing corneal perforations [39,40,41,42].
With advances in contact lens technology, they can be used in novel ways, such as in drug delivery, and animal studies have found that drug-eluting contact lenses can increase bioavailability by up to 50%, compared to eye drops [43,44]. Furthermore, contact lens sensing technology may be useful in helping to detect ocular biomarkers for DED development [45]. While they show promise as a treatment option for ocular surface disorders, longer-term studies are needed to evaluate their ocular toxicity and biocompatibility in humans.
Additionally, contact lens care and hygiene is of paramount importance to minimise the risk of complications, especially in cases where extended wear is prescribed, and wearers must be educated on how to insert and remove their lenses properly, as well as how to look after them correctly.

2.5. Heat, Light, and Low-Level Light Therapy

Warming the eyelids and then massaging the meibomian glands can help manage dry eye symptoms that occur as a result of MGD. This can be performed manually or with automated thermodynamic treatment devices, which have been shown to be effective in managing MGD [46,47].
Light therapies have more recently been developed to treat DED [48]. Intense Pulsed Light [IPL] was first used to treat dermatological conditions such as acne before being used for ophthalmological conditions around 20 years ago [14]. Flashes of light of different wavelengths are applied to the eyelid and surrounding tissues and are absorbed, thereby generating heat. It has been reported that IPL can increase tear film stability, lipid layer thickness [49], and tear break-up times [50]. The exact mechanism by which IPL provides relief is unclear, with several proposed hypotheses, which include the reduction in bacterial load on the eyelids, the eradication of demodex, thrombosis of abnormal blood vessels, the softening of meibum, and the clearing of meibomian glands [51,52,53,54]. Studies suggest that in those with moderate-to-severe symptoms, IPL in combination with meibomian gland expression could be an effective approach for treating DED caused by meibomian gland dysfunction [55,56]. However, it is not recommended in those with dark or deeply pigmented skin due to the risk of skin damage, and other adverse effects include loss of or thinning of eyelashes and eyebrows, corneal epithelial defects, conjunctival irritation, and corneal complications [54]. Exclusion criteria for IPL include those with skin disorders [57] and a history of uveitis and/or herpes simplex virus infection [58]. In general, dry eye management would only be considered once any active infection or inflammation has been resolved.
Low-level light therapy using wavelengths in the visible and near infra-red spectral range has recently been used for MGD, and early studies have shown an improvement in outcomes such as corneal staining [59], as well as other measures like lissamine green staining, the Schirmer test, meibography scores, and a range of tear parameters [54]. Low-level light therapy can be used in conjunction with IPL for MGD, with mixed findings. Some have reported finding improvements in symptoms after combination therapy [60], while others found a greater benefit with IPL but no strong benefit of low-level light therapy [61]. Therefore, further comparative studies are warranted.

2.6. Surgical and Transplantation

With more severe forms of ocular surface disease and dry eye conditions, non-invasive treatments are less effective, and surgical intervention is required in order to lower the risk of complications developing, which may affect sight. Depending on the cause, surgical approaches that may be considered include lid-based surgeries such as tarsorrhaphy, upper or lower lid blepharoplasty, levator resection, injection with Botulinum toxin A, conjunctival flap surgery, gland transplantation, as well as others [62]. For example, conjunctivochalasis is a condition that is often misdiagnosed as DED and is characterised by loose conjunctival folds, which can affect tear film stability, leading to dry eye symptoms. Risk factors include age, inflammation, and mechanical friction, and may be more favourably managed surgically as opposed to with other first-line, non-invasive treatment methods such as eye drops, ointments, and bandage contact lenses. Surgical options include conjunctival resection, cauterization, as well as radiowave electrosurgery [13,63].
Tarsorrhaphy is the closure of the eyelids either temporarily or permanently and may be warranted in cases such as persistent epithelial defects in order to help retain the tear film to prevent desiccation. This option has been found to have a quicker healing time than alternatives like amniotic membrane transplantation [64].
Lower lid blepharoplasty is indicated for ectropion and lower lid laxity [65]. Upper lid blepharoplasty can alleviate symptoms of dry eye in the long term without impacting tear film dynamics [66]. However, somewhat counter-intuitively, complications of lid surgery can include an increase in the signs and symptoms of dry eye [67].
Conjunctival disorders, such as pterygium, pinguecula, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, amongst others, may cause DED. The aim of conjunctival flap surgery is the restoration of corneal surface integrity in severe ocular surface diseases. It involves using a thin conjunctival flap to repair the cornea; however, since the evolution of more effective therapeutic options, its use has declined markedly, especially in developed countries [68]. Excision may be indicated for pterygium and pinguecula, followed by conjunctival or amniotic membrane grafting [62].
The lacrimal and salivary glands have a similar structural composition and autonomic innervation [69]. Therefore, transplantation of glands like the salivary glands or the secretory duct of the parotid duct gland may be an option to restore lubrication to the ocular surface in certain, more severe cases where other treatment options have failed. However, there may be complications associated with parotid gland transplantation surgery, and so this is usually reserved as an endpoint treatment option [62]. Potential adverse effects of parotid gland transplantation include atrophic and degenerative changes in the transplanted glands, infection, fistula formation, duct obstruction, amongst others [13]. Transplantation of minor salivary glands into the upper or lower conjunctival fornix is simpler in comparison and can improve outcome measures such as ocular surface staining, TBUT, and visual acuity, with reported postoperative complications including graft necrosis, ptosis, and donor site granuloma formation [70].

2.7. Gene Therapy

This technique refers to the transfer of genetic material in order to treat disease [71]. While the concept has existed for nearly half a century, it has more recently gained traction as a treatment option for various human diseases, including those affecting the anterior eye. Applications include conditions that cause abnormal wound healing, inflammation, corneal cloudiness, scarring, and graft rejection [72]. Many autoimmune diseases like Sjögren’s syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and lupus are associated with DED, and animal studies have shown promising results of gene therapy in restoring tear production and reducing corneal surface defects [73]. Further trials translating gene therapy into human clinical trials are needed.

2.8. Cell-Based Therapies

Persistent corneal epithelial defects may occur for a multitude of different reasons, including severe dry eye, and these corneal defects may lead to corneal opacification and loss of vision. Cell-based therapies using both corneal and non-corneal stem cells have been used to replace damaged corneal epithelial cells and regenerate the ocular surface [74,75,76].
Different types of stem cells have been used for corneal surface regeneration [77], including both corneal and non-corneal, which can be sub-classified into four groups [Figure 1]. Non-corneal stem cells are able to differentiate into cells that have characteristics of corneal epithelial cells. Pluripotent cells are derived from embryonic stem cells, epithelial stem cells from oral mucus, amniotic membrane, epidermis, and hair follicles, mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, adipose tissue, amniotic membrane, placenta, and umbilical cord, and neural crest origin stem cells from dental pulp stem cells [76].

2.9. Amniotic Membrane and Amniotic Drops

There are various sources of corneal and non-corneal stem cells. Foetal and oral cavity tissues are examples of tissues that are abundant in stem cells, and foetal tissue in particular has gained interest in regenerative therapies for ocular surface disorders. The placenta is normally treated as waste material and discarded after birth; however, amnion, which is the innermost epithelial layer of the placenta, can be harvested and used as transplant material [78]. The amniotic membrane can be obtained after elective caesarean deliveries and processed into a graftable material [79]; however, it requires specialised storage and application.
Amniotic membrane transplantation [AMT] was first used surgically in 1910 as a substitute material for a skin graft. It was first used for ocular applications in the 1940s and then largely abandoned until the 1990s when it regained popularity amongst ophthalmologists [80,81]. It has anti-inflammatory properties [82,83,84], antibacterial effects against a range of bacteria, as well as anti-viral properties [85,86,87,88]. AMT has been used in the treatment of corneal ulcers, certain glaucoma cases, after excision of malignant and benign tumours, in oculoplastics, for pterygium, as well as in strabismus surgery. It has also been used in the treatment of chemical burns, Steven–Johnson syndrome, graft versus host disease, and recurrent corneal erosion, and shows promise as a treatment option for advanced DED [14,78,89,90].
The cryopreserved amniotic membrane has been shown to improve the ocular surface recovery in those with moderate-to-severe DED after 1 month [90] and 3 months [91]. A novel specialised bandage contact lens, which uses a room-temperature stable dehydrated amniotic membrane that is applied using a specialised bandage contact lens, has been developed, which enables suture-less application, and early research has shown promise for the treatment of moderate-to-severe DED, with an improvement in symptoms and a decrease in ocular surface signs of stress after 1 month [90]. Dehydrated amniotic membrane can also be applied with standard soft disposable contact lenses, and similar results have been found demonstrating favourable epithelial recovery in those with severe DED [92]. Sutureless applications of the amniotic membrane are gaining popularity for both DED [91,93] and other disorders, including ulcerative keratitis, persistent corneal epithelial defects, chemical and thermal burns, neuropathic corneal pain, and others [94,95,96,97,98,99]. It may offer economic benefits to clinical services compared to some current standard treatment options, such as cyclosporin, for severe DED, as well as better reported clinical outcomes [100].
AMT has been reported to provide sustained symptomatic improvement in dry eye patients with reduced corneal and conjunctival staining, and some report improved corneal nerve density [91,96,101,102,103,104].
A novel approach that extracts amniotic membranes to be re-hydrated so that they can be applied topically as drops has been developed, and early results show promise in their safe and effective use for reducing symptoms and clinical signs of severe ocular surface disease, persistent epithelial defects, and corneal ulcers [105,106,107,108]. However, further studies are needed.

2.10. Egg Shell Membrane

There are similarities between skin and cornea wound healing. The treatment for chronic skin wounds often calls for regular application of topical drugs, and this is also often the case with chronic ocular surface disorders. Adherence can be problematic, and thus, the development of a two-in-one ocular bandage could prove useful to a large proportion of the population, particularly older people or those who struggle with administering drops due to dexterity or for other reasons. A drug-incorporated bandage could also be useful for the treatment of chronic wounds to relieve pain, protect the ocular surface, promote corneal healing and epithelial regeneration, and deliver ophthalmic drugs on the ocular surface. However, such a bandage would need to consider the physical and surface properties such as thickness, transparency, modulus, wettability, water content, oxygen permeability, and maximal drug loading capacity [109].
The eggshell membrane [ESM] is a naturally occurring material from the poultry and food industries, which has recently gained attention for its use in biomedical and healthcare applications due to its unique physical and biological properties. In essence, the ESM is a clear film that lines the eggshell [ES] and consists of the inner side membrane, also termed the limiting membrane, and the outer membrane [Figure 2].
As a whole, the ESM has a significantly high protein load of approximately 80–85%, where at least 500 different types of proteins have been identified, of which the collagen superfamily provides the major structural component [110]. Crucially, the outer ESM contains only collagen type I, whereas the inner ESM contains both collagen type I and V, thus dictating the translational applications of the substrate [111,112]. Moreover, the ESM procures a wide range of bioactive components, such as fibronectin, proteoglycans, and glycoproteins, as well as other inorganic components, during its formation and ageing process, as summarised in Table 1.
The ESM closely resembles the structure and composition of the extracellular matrix [ECM], exhibits semi-permeability, porosity, is non-toxic and biodegradable, has anti-inflammatory and antibacterial properties, and so naturally lends itself towards biomedical translational applications [109]. It benefits from low costs, material availability, and accessibility, as well as reduced ethical concerns. Recently, microparticles were incorporated into ESM to produce a cheap, effective, and rapid wound bandage for patients. The generated bandage was characterised by evaluating the physical, mechanical, and biological properties and reported to show good biocompatibility and did not promote pro-angiogenesis. Although the bandage exhibited promising cornea wound healing properties, further work investigating in vivo wound healing will need to be undertaken to validate its effectiveness [120].
Although it may seem that the ESM is presented as a novel material in medical research, historical biomedical uses of the ESM have been reported; for example, within traditional Chinese medicine, the ESM was used to treat burns, ulcers, and tympanic perforations. In ophthalmology, the first use of the ESM is believed to date back to 1899 for the treatment of symblepharon, ocular burn, corneal ulcer, and iritis. Here, raw ESM was applied directly to the wounds, with the resulting outcomes being reduced irritation, pain, and infection risk, as well as improved healing and recovery [121]. In hindsight, this study can be considered to be a pioneer in paving the first steps for the use of ESM as a scaffold to facilitate the growth and repair of ocular tissues. Recently, Choi and colleagues [122] used the ESM to regenerate the retinal pigment epithelium by incorporating it within gellan gum. Mensah and coworkers further explored the ESM as a potential material for corneal wound healing due to its innate characteristics of transparency, porosity, and permeability, with a study demonstrating that the ESM is capable of successfully supporting the attachment and proliferation of immortalised corneal epithelial cells and corneal mesenchymal stromal cells [120]. A number of complementary studies by the same team also considered incorporating drug and/or growth factor-loaded microparticles, as well as embedding silver nanoparticles within the ESM to further increase the therapeutic efficacy or enhance the antimicrobial capabilities of the membrane, respectively [123,124,125].
While no other studies have yet reported on the use of ESM in ophthalmic surgery or other ocular applications, current research is promising, and it seems that the future direction of ESM-based research includes its enhancement to improve the desired function required for its ultimate endpoint application, and as such, further developments in this area are expected.

3. Conclusions

The ocular surface is a complex structure that may be altered by disease, giving rise to painful ocular signs and symptoms in the patient. There are many different therapeutic strategies for the treatment of severe dry eye, and this is currently an area of active research, with many new and emerging treatment options in development. Recently, regeneration therapies have emerged as a promising approach to repairing the damaged ocular surface. In advanced cases with severe DED, where conventional therapies may not provide effective relief, more surgical intervention may be required. Management options should consider the underlying contributing causes and should consider the severity of the disease in order to provide safe, lasting, and effective relief.

Author Contributions

S.K.D.—Conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, review and editing; M.J.P.—writing—original draft preparation, review and editing; D.Y.S.C.—writing—original draft preparation, review and editing; S.B.K.—writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

D.Y.S.C. the CEO/CSO/Founder of ReOvum Ltd. ReOvum Ltd. made no financial contributions to this study. S.K.D., M.J.P. and S.B.K. declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sotozono, C.; Inatomi, T.; Nakamura, T.; Ueta, M.; Imai, K.; Fukuoka, H.; Komai, S.; Ishida, G.; Kitazawa, K.; Yokoi, N.; et al. Oral mucosal epithelial transplantation and limbal-rigid contact lens: A therapeutic modality for the treatment of severe ocular surface disorders. Cornea 2020, 39, S19–S27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wolffsohn, J.S.; Benítez-Del-Castillo, J.; Loya-Garcia, D.; Inomata, T.; Iyar, G.; Liang, L.; Pult, H.; Sabater, A.L.; Starr, C.E.; Vehof, J.; et al. TFOS DEWS III Diagnostic Methodology. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2025, 279, 387–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Galor, A.; Britten-Jones, A.C.; Feng, Y.; Ferrari, G.; Goldblum, D.; Gupta, P.K.; Merayo-Lloves, J.; Na, K.S.; Naroo, S.A.; Nichols, K.K.; et al. TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of lifestyle challenges on the ocular surface. Ocul. Surf. 2023, 28, 262–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cappelli, L.C.; Gutierrez, A.K.; Baer, A.N.; Albayda, J.; Manno, R.L.; Haque, U.; Lipson, E.J.; Bleich, K.B.; Shah, A.A.; Naidoo, J.; et al. Inflammatory arthritis and sicca syndrome induced by nivolumab and ipilimumab. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nguyen, A.T.; Elia, M.; Materin, M.A.; Sznol, M.; Chow, J. Cyclosporine for dry eye associated with nivolumab: A case pro-gressing to corneal perforation. Cornea 2016, 35, 399–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vishnevskia-Dai, V.; Rozner, L.; Berger, R.; Jaron, Z.; Elyashiv, S.; Markel, G.; Zloto, O. Ocular side effects of novel anti-cancer biological therapies. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Quesada, J.M.; Lloves, J.M.; Delgado, D.V. Ocular chemical burns in the workplace: Epidemiological characteristics. Burns 2019, 46, 1212–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dua, H.S.; Ting, D.S.J.; Al Saadi, A.; Said, D.G. Chemical eye injury: Pathophysiology, assessment and management. Eye 2020, 34, 2001–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kunert, K.S.; Tisdale, A.S.; Gipson, I.K. Goblet cell numbers and epithelial proliferation in the conjunctiva of patients with dry eye syndrome treated with cyclosporine. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2002, 120, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Periman, L.M.; Mah, F.S.; Karpecki, P.M. A review of the mechanism of action of cyclosporine A: The role of cyclosporine A in dry eye disease and recent formulation developments. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2020, 2020, 4187–4200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pflugfelder, S.C. Antiinflammatory therapy for dry eye. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2004, 137, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Anitua, E.; De la Fuente, M.; Muruzabal, F.; Riestra, A.; Merayo-Lloves, J.; Orive, G. Plasma rich in growth factors [PRGF] eye drops stimulates scarless regeneration compared to autologous serum in the ocular surface stromal fibroblasts. Exp. Eye Res. 2015, 135, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jones, L.; Jongkhajornpong, J.P.; Markoulli, M.; Karpecki, P.; Akpek, E.K.; Basu, S.; Bitton, E.; Chen, W.; Dhaliwal, D.K.; Dogru, M.; et al. TFOS DEWS III Management and Therapy Report. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2025, 279, 289–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jones, L.; Downie, L.E.; Korb, D.; Benitez-del-Castillo, J.M.; Dana, R.; Deng, S.X.; Dong, P.N.; Geerling, G.; Hida, R.Y.; Liu, Y.; et al. TFOS DEWS II management and therapy report. Ocul. Surf. 2017, 15, 575–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Vazirani, J.; Sridhar, U.; Gokhale, N.; Doddigarla, V.R.; Sharma, S.; Basu, S. Autologous serum eye drops in dry eye disease: Preferred practice pattern guidelines. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2023, 71, 1357–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fox, R.I.; Chan, R.; Michelson, J.B.; Belmont, J.B.; Michelson, P.E. Beneficial effect of artificial tears made with autologous serum in patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Arthritis Rheum. 1984, 27, 459–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Janus, J.; Chmielewska, K.; Antoniewicz-Papis, J. Allogeneic serum-based eye drops may give better results than autolo-gous drops in Sjögren’s syndrome dry eye. Transfus. Apher. Sci. 2024, 63, 103991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hassan, A.; Balal, S.; Cook, E.; Dehbi, H.M.; Pardhan, S.; Bourne, R.; Ahmad, S.; Sharma, A. Finger-prick autologous blood (FAB) eye drops for dry eye disease: Single masked multi-Centre randomised controlled trial. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2022, 16, 3973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Than, J.; Balal, S.; Wawrzynski, J.; Nesaratnam, N.; Saleh, G.M.; Moore, J.; Patel, A.; Shah, S.; Sharma, B.; Kumar, B.; et al. Fingerprick autologous blood: A novel treatment for dry eye syndrome. Eye 2017, 31, 1655–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ralph, R.A.; Doane, M.G.; Dohlman, C.H. Clinical experience with a mobile ocular perfusion pump. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1975, 93, 1039–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. López-Plandolit, S.; Morales, M.C.; Freire, V.; Grau, A.E.; Durán, J.A. Efficacy of plasma rich in growth factors for the treat-ment of dry eye. Cornea 2011, 30, 1312–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Soifer, M.; Tovar, A.; Wang, M.; Mousa, H.M.; Yennam, S.; Sabater, A.L.; Pflugfelder, S.C.; Perez, V.L. A multicenter report of the use of plasma rich in growth factors [PRGF] for the treatment of patients with ocular surface diseases in North America. Ocul. Surf. 2022, 25, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Anitua, E.; Muruzabal, F.; Tayebba, A.; Riestra, A.; Perez, V.L.; Merayo-Lloves, J.; Orive, G. Autologous serum and plasma rich in growth factors in ophthalmology: Preclinical and clinical studies. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015, 93, e605–e614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jongkhajornpong, P.; Lekhanont, K.; Rattanasiri, S.; Numthavaj, P.; McKay, G.; Attia, J.; Thakkinstian, A. Efficacy of 100% autologous platelet-rich plasma and 100% autologous serum in dry eye disease: A randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024, 9, e001857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Freeman, J.M. The punctum plug: Evaluation of a new treatment for the dry eye. Trans. Sect. Ophthalmol. Am. Acad. Ophthal-mol. Otolaryngol. 1975, 79, OP874-9. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kumar, S.V. Role of punctal plugs as a primarily treatment modality in moderate to severe dry eye. Int. J. Clin. Trials 2020, 7, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chi, S.L.; Acquah, K.F.; Richard, M.J.; Lee, P.P.; Sloan, F.A. Longitudinal evidence on punctal plug use in an elderly popula-tion. Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012, 28, 289–293. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jehangir, N.; Bever, G.; Mahmood, S.J.; Moshirfar, M. Comprehensive review of the literature on existing punctal plugs for the management of dry eye disease. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 2016, 9312340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Best, A.L.; Labetoulle, M.; Legrand, M.; M’garrech, M.; Barreau, E.; Rousseau, A. Punctal and canalicular plugs: Indications, efficacy and safety. J. Français D’ophtalmologie 2019, 42, e95–e104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Baxter, S.A.; Laibson, P.R. Punctal plugs in the management of dry eyes. Ocul. Surf. 2004, 2, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mansour, K.; Leonhardt, C.J.; Kalk, W.W.; Bootsma, H.; Bruin, K.J.; Blanksma, L.J. Lacrimal punctum occlusion in the treat-ment of severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca caused by Sjögren syndrome: A uniocular evaluation. Cornea 2007, 26, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Burgess, P.I.; Koay, P.; Clark, P. SmartPlug versus silicone punctal plug therapy for dry eye: A prospective randomized trial. Cornea 2008, 27, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Y.; Carreno-Galeano, J.T.; Singh, R.B.; Dana, R.; Yin, J. Long-term outcomes of punctal cauterization in the management of ocular surface diseases. Cornea 2021, 40, 168–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Baradaran-Rafii, A.; Eslani, M.; Haq, Z.; Shirzadeh, E.; Huvard, M.J.; Djalilian, A.R. Current and upcoming therapies for ocu-lar surface chemical injuries. Ocul. Surf. 2017, 15, 48–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shi, D.-N.; Song, H.; Ding, T.; Qiu, W.-Q.; Wang, W. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of therapeutic bandage contact lenses on post-cataract surgery patients. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 11, 230–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, X.; Yuan, R.; Sun, M.; Chen, X.; Lin, S.; Ye, J.; Chen, C. Efficacy of an ocular bandage contact lens for the treatment of dry eye after phacoemulsification. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019, 19, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Thomas, M.; Shorter, E.; Joslin, C.E.; McMahon, T.J.; Cortina, M.S. Contact lens use in patients with Boston keratoprosthesis type 1: Fitting, management, and complications. Eye Contact Lens. 2015, 41, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kammerdiener, L.L.; Speiser, J.L.; Aquavella, J.V.; Harissi-Dagher, M.; Dohlman, C.H.; Chodosh, J.; Ciolino, J.B. Protective effect of soft contact lenses after Boston keratoprosthesis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 100, 549–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lim, L.; Tan, D.T.; Chan, W.K. Therapeutic use of Bausch & Lomb PureVision contact lenses. CLAO J. 2001, 27, 179–185. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sharma, A.; Kaur, R.; Kumar, S.; Gupta, P.; Pandav, S.; Patnaik, B.; Gupta, A. Fibrin glue versus N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate in corneal perforations. Ophthalmology 2003, 110, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jhanji, V.; Young, A.L.; Mehta, J.S.; Sharma, N.; Agarwal, T.; Vajpayee, R.B. Management of corneal perforation. Surv. Oph-thalmol. 2011, 56, 522–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rana, M.; Savant, V. A brief review of techniques used to seal corneal perforation using cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2013, 36, 156–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Peng, C.C.; Burke, M.T.; Carbia, B.E.; Plummer, C.; Chauhan, A. Extended drug delivery by contact lenses for glaucoma therapy. J. Control. Release 2012, 162, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jung, H.J.; Abou-Jaoude, M.; Carbia, B.E.; Plummer, C.; Chauhan, A. Glaucoma Therapy by Extended Release of Timolol from Nanoparticle Loaded Silicone-Hydrogel Contact Lenses. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2013, 165, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mondal, H.; Kim, H.J.; Mohanto, N.; Jee, J.P. A review on dry eye disease treatment: Recent Progress, diagnostics, and future perspectives. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Finis, D.; Hayajneh, J.; König, C.; Borrelli, M.; Schrader, S.; Geerling, G. Evaluation of an automated thermodynamic treat-ment (LipiFlow®) system for meibomian gland dysfunction: A prospective, randomized, observer-masked trial. Ocul. Surf. 2014, 12, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gomez, M.L.; Jung, J.; Gonzales, D.D.; Shacterman, S.; Afshari, N.; Cheng, L. Comparison of manual versus automated thermal lid therapy with expression for meibomian gland dysfunction in patients with dry eye disease. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 22287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Demolin, L.; Es-Safi, M.; Soyfoo, M.S.; Motulsky, E. Intense Pulsed Light Therapy in the Treatment of Dry Eye Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xue, A.L.; Wang, M.T.M.; Ormonde, S.E.; Craig, J. Randomised double-masked placebo-controlled trial of the cumulative treatment efficacy profile of intense pulsed light therapy for meibomian gland dysfunction. Ocul. Surf. 2020, 18, 286–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Toyos, R.; Desai, N.R.; Toyos, M.; Dell, S.J. Intense pulsed light improves signs and symptoms of dry eye disease due to meibomian gland dysfunction: A randomized controlled study. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0270268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Suwal, A.; Hao, J.-L.; Zhou, D.-D.; Liu, X.-F.; Suwal, R.; Lu, C.-W. Use of Intense Pulsed Light to Mitigate Meibomian Gland Dysfunction for Dry Eye Disease. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 17, 1385–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Papageorgiou, P.; Clayton, W.; Norwood, S.; Chopra, S.; Rustin, M. Treatment of rosacea with intense pulsed light: Signifi-cant improvement and long-lasting results. Br. J. Dermatol. 2008, 159, 628–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fishman, H.A.; Periman, L.M.; Shah, A.A. Real-Time Video Microscopy of In Vitro Demodex Death by Intense Pulsed Light. Photobiomodul. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2020, 38, 472–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gomes, J.A.P.; Azar, D.T.; Baudouin, C.; Bitton, E.; Chen, W.; Hafezi, F.; Hamrah, P.; Hogg, R.E.; Horwath-Winter, J.; Kon-tadakis, G.A.; et al. TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of elective medications and procedures on the ocular surface. Ocul. Surf. 2023, 29, 331–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wladis, E.J.; Aakalu, V.K.; Foster, J.A.; Freitag, S.K.; Sobel, R.K.; Tao, J.P.; Yen, M.T. Intense pulsed light for meibomian gland disease: A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2020, 127, 1227–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Messmer, E.M. Pathophysiology of dry eye disease and novel therapeutic targets. Exp. Eye Res. 2022, 217, 108944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ribeiro, B.B.; Marta, A.; Ramalhão, J.P.; Marques, J.H.; Barbosa, I. Pulsed light therapy in the management of dry eye disease: Current perspectives. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2022, 16, 3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Qiao, C.; Li, L.; Wang, H.; Zhao, C.; Ke, L.; Sen, D.; Qi, M.; Li, S.; Wang, M.; Zeng, Q. Adverse events of intense pulsed light combined with meibomian gland expression versus meibomian gland expression in the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction. Lasers Surg. Med. 2021, 53, 664–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Park, Y.; Kim, H.; Kim, S.; Cho, K.J. Effect of low-level light therapy in patients with dry eye: A prospective, randomized, observer-masked trial. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 3575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ballesteros-Sanchez, A.; Gargallo-Martinez, B.; Sánchez-González, M.C.; Sanchez-Gonzalez, J.M. Intense pulse light com-bined with low-level light therapy in dry eye disease: A systematic review. Eye Contact Lens 2023, 49, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Marques, J.H.; Marta, A.; Baptista, P.M.; Almeida, D.; José, D.; Sousa, P.J.; Barbosa, I. Low-level light therapy in association with intense pulsed light for meibomian gland dysfunction. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2022, 16, 4003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gurnani, B.; Kaur, K. Current Approach in Surgical Management of Dry Eyes–Dry Eye Review II. TNOA J. Ophthalmic Sci. Res. 2021, 59, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kim, B.; Lee, Y.; Son, H.S.; Choi, C.Y. Clinical outcomes of conjunctivochalasis treatment with a new ophthalmic radiofre-quency device. BMC Ophthalmol. 2024, 24, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dhillon, H.K.; Bahadur, H.; Raj, A. A comparative study of tarsorrhaphy and amniotic membrane transplantation in the healing of persistent corneal epithelial defects. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 68, 29–33. [Google Scholar]
  65. Prischmann, J.; Sufyan, A.; Ting, J.Y.; Ruffin, C.; Perkins, S.W. Dry eye symptoms and chemosis following blepharoplasty: A 10-year retrospective review of 892 cases in a single-surgeon series. JAMA Facial Plast. Surg. 2013, 15, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hollander, M.H.; Pott, J.W.R.; Delli, K.; Vissink, A.; Schepers, R.H.; Jansma, J. Impact of upper blepharoplasty, with or without orbicularis oculi muscle removal, on tear film dynamics and dry eye symptoms: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022, 100, 564–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rodrigues, C.; Carvalho, F.; Marques, M. Upper eyelid blepharoplasty: Surgical techniques and results—Systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2023, 47, 1870–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zemba, M.; Stamate, A.C.; Tataru, C.P.; Branisteanu, D.C.; Balta, F. Conjunctival flap surgery in the management of ocular surface disease. Exp. Ther. Med. 2020, 20, 3412–3416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Singh, S.; Basu, S.; Geerling, G. Salivary gland transplantation for dry eye disease: Indications, techniques, and outcomes. Ocul. Surf. 2022, 26, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Vazirani, J.; Bhalekar, S.; Amescua, G.; Singh, S.; Basu, S. Minor salivary gland transplantation for severe dry eye disease due to cicatrising conjunctivitis: Multicentre long-term outcomes of a modified technique. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 105, 1485–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Anguela, X.M.; High, K.A. Entering the modern era of gene therapy. Annu. Rev. Med. 2019, 70, 273–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Amador, C.; Shah, R.; Ghiam, S.; Kramerov, A.A.; Ljubimov, A.V. Gene Therapy in the Anterior Eye Segment. Curr. Gene Ther. 2022, 22, 104–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Trousdale, M.D.; Zhu, Z.; Stevenson, D.; Schechter, J.E.; Ritter, T.; Mircheff, A.K. Expression of TNF inhibitor gene in the lacrimal gland promotes recovery of tear production and tear stability and reduced immunopathology in rabbits with in-duced autoimmune dacryoadenitis. J. Autoimmune Dis. 2005, 2, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nieto-Nicolau, N.; Martínez-Conesa, E.M.; Velasco-García, A.M.; Aloy-Reverté, C.; Vilarrodona, A.; Casaroli-Marano, R.P. Xenofree generation of limbal stem cells for ocular surface advanced cell therapy. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bandeira, F.; Goh, T.W.; Setiawan, M.; Yam, G.H.F.; Mehta, J.S. Cellular therapy of corneal epithelial defect by adipose mesenchymal stem cell-derived epithelial progenitors. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nosrati, H.; Alizadeh, Z.; Nosrati, A.; Ashrafi-Dehkordi, K.; Banitalebi-Dehkordi, M.; Sanami, S.; Khodaei, M. Stem cell-based therapeutic strategies for corneal epithelium regeneration. Tissue Cell 2021, 68, 101470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Joshi, V.P.; Singh, S.; Thacker, M.; Pati, F.; Vemuganti, G.K.; Basu, S.; Singh, V. Newer approaches to dry eye therapy: Nano-technology, regenerative medicine, and tissue engineering. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2023, 71, 1292–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Walkden, A. Amniotic membrane transplantation in ophthalmology: An updated perspective. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2020, 2020, 2057–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hopkinson, A.; Britchford, E.R.; Sidney, L.E. Preparation of dried amniotic membrane for corneal repair. In Corneal Regener-ation Methods and Protocols; Ahearne, M., Ed.; Humana: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 143–157. [Google Scholar]
  80. Davis, J.S., II. Skin grafting at the johns hopkins hospital. Ann. Surg. 1909, 50, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. De Rötth, A. Plastic repair of conjunctival defects with fetal membranes. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1940, 23, 522–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sharma, N.; Singh, D.; Maharana, P.K.; Kriplani, A.; Velpandian, T.; Pandey, R.M.; Vajpayee, R.B. Comparison of Amniotic Membrane Transplantation and Umbilical Cord Serum in Acute Ocular Chemical Burns: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 168, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tabatabaei, S.A.; Soleimani, M.; Behrouz, M.J.; Torkashvand, A.; Anvari, P.; Yaseri, M. A randomized clinical trial to evalu-ate the usefulness of amniotic membrane transplantation in bacterial keratitis healing. Ocul. Surf. 2017, 15, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tandon, R.; Gupta, N.; Kalaivani, M.; Sharma, N.; Titiyal, J.S.; Vajpayee, R.B. Amniotic membrane transplantation as an ad-junct to medical therapy in acute ocular burns. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2011, 95, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kjaergaard, N.; Helmig, R.B.; Schonheyder, H.C.; Uldbjerg, N.; Hansen, E.S.; Madsen, H. Chorioamniotic membranes con-stitute a competent barrier to group b streptococcus in vitro. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1999, 83, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kjaergaard, N.; Hein, M.; Hyttel, L.; Helmig, R.; Schønheyder, H.; Uldbjerg, N.; Madsen, H. Antibacterial properties of hu-man amnion and chorion in vitro. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2001, 94, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gabric, N.; Mravicic, I.; Dekaris, I.; Karaman, Z.; Mitrovic, S. Human amniotic membrane in the reconstruction of the ocular surface. Doc. Ophthalmol. 1999, 98, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sangwan, V.S.; Basu, S. Antimicrobial properties of amniotic membrane. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2011, 95, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Sanders, F.W.B.; Huang, J.; Alió Del Barrio, J.L.; Hamada, S.; McAlinden, C. Amniotic membrane transplantation: Structural and biological properties, tissue preparation, application and clinical indications. Eye 2023, 38, 668–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Travé-Huarte, S.; Wolffsohn, J.S. Bilateral Sutureless Application of Human Dehydrated Amniotic Membrane with a Spe-cialised Bandage Contact Lens for Moderate-to-Severe Dry Eye Disease: A Prospective Study with 1-Month Follow-Up. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2024, 2024, 1329–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. McDonald, M.B.; Sheha, H.; Tighe, S.; Janik, S.B.; Bowden, F.W.; Chokshi, A.R.; Singer, M.A.; Nanda, S.; Qazi, M.A.; Dierker, D.; et al. Treatment outcomes in the DRy eye amniotic membrane [DREAM] study. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2018, 2018, 677–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Jo, K.S.; Kim, K.Y.; Lee, Y.W.; Han, S.B.; Choi, C.Y. Clinical outcomes and indications of in-office sutureless dried gamma ray-sterilized human amniotic membrane transplantation with bandage contact lenses in various ocular surface disorders. Cornea 2024, 43, 1383–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. McDonald, M.; Janik, S.B.; Bowden, F.W.; Chokshi, A.; Singer, M.A.; Tighe, S.; Mead, O.G.; Nanda, S.; Qazi, M.; Dierker, D.; et al. Association of treatment duration and clinical outcomes in dry eye treatment with sutureless cryopreserved amniotic membrane. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2023, 17, 2697–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kheirkhah, A.; Johnson, D.A.; Paranjpe, D.R.; Raju, V.K.; Casas, V.; Tseng, S.C.G. Temporary sutureless amniotic membrane patch for acute alkaline burns. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2008, 126, 1059–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Sheha, H.; Liang, L.Y.; Li, J.J.; Tseng, S.C.G. Sutureless amniotic membrane transplantation for severe bacterial keratitis. Cornea 2009, 28, 1118–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Suri, K.; Kosker, M.; Raber, I.M.; Hammersmith, K.M.; Nagra, P.K.; Ayres, B.D.; Halfpenny, C.P.; Rapuano, C.J. Sutureless amniotic membrane prokera for ocular surface disorders: Short-term results. Article. Eye 2013, 39, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Morkin, M.I.; Hamrah, P. Efficacy of self-retained cryopreserved amniotic membrane for treatment of neuropathic corneal pain. Ocul. Surf. 2018, 16, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Maqsood, S.; Elsawah, K.; Dhillon, N.; Soliman, S.; Laginaf, M.; Lodhia, V.; Lake, D.; Hamada, S.; Elalfy, M. Management of persistent corneal epithelial defects with human amniotic membrane-derived dry matrix. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2021, 15, 2231–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mimouni, M.; Trinh, T.; Sorkin, N.; Cohen, E.; Santaella, G.; Rootman, D.S.; Slomovic, A.R.; Chan, C.C. Sutureless dehydrat-ed amniotic membrane for persistent epithelial defects. Euro J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 32, 875–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Voigt, J. Cost utility analysis of cryopreserved amniotic membrane versus topical cyclosporine for the treatment of moder-ate to severe dry eye syndrome. Cost. Eff. Resour. Alloc. 2020, 18, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kolomeyer, A.M.; Do, B.K.; Tu, Y.; Chu, D.S. Placement of ProKera in the management of ocular manifestations of acute Stevens-Johnson syndrome in an outpatient. Eye Contact Lens. 2013, 39, e7–e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Cheng, A.M.; Zhao, D.; Chen, R.; Yin, H.Y.; Tighe, S.; Sheha, H.; Casas, V.; Tseng, S.C. Accelerated restoration of ocular sur-face health in dry eye disease by self-retained cryopreserved amniotic membrane. Ocul. Surf. 2016, 14, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Craig, J.P.; Nelson, J.D.; Azar, D.T.; Belmonte, C.; Bron, A.J.; Chauhan, S.K.; de Paiva, C.S.; Gomes, J.A.; Hammitt, K.M.; Jones, L.; et al. TFOS DEWS II Report Executive Summary. Ocul. Surf. 2017, 15, 802–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. John, T.; Tighe, S.; Sheha, H.; Hamrah, P.; Salem, Z.M.; Cheng, A.M.S.; Wang, M.X.; Rock, N.D. Corneal Nerve Regeneration after Self-Retained Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane in Dry Eye Disease. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 2017, 6404918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Pérez, M.L.; Barreales, S.; Sabater-Cruz, N.; Martinez-Conesa, E.M.; Vilarrodona, A.; Casaroli-Marano, R.P. Amniotic mem-brane extract eye drops: A new approach to severe ocular surface pathologies. Cell Tissue Bank. 2022, 23, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sabater-Cruz, N.; Figueras-Roca, M.; Ferrán-Fuertes, M.; Agustí, E.; Martínez-Conesa, E.M.; Pérez-Rodríguez, M.L.; Vilarrodona, A.; Casaroli-Marano, R.P. Amniotic membrane extract eye drops for ocular surface diseases: Use and clinical outcome in real-world practice. Int. Ophthalmol. 2021, 41, 2973–2979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Agusti, E.; Martinez-Conesa, E.M.; Perez, M.L.; Sabater-Cruz, N.; Casaroli-Marano, R.P.; Vilarrodona, A. 30 A new step on amniotic membrane extract eye drops [AMEED] development for the treatment of severe ocular surface pathologies. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2022, 7, A13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Nam, J.W.; Kim, J.; Yoon, H.J.; Yoon, K.C. Effects of amniotic membrane extract eye drops on persistent epithelial defects of the cornea. J. Korean Ophthalmol. Soc. 2021, 62, 1340–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mensah, R.A.; Salim, K.; Peszko, K.; Diop, S.; Wong, T.H.; Chau, D.Y. The chicken eggshell membrane: A versatile, sustaina-ble, biological material for translational biomedical applications. Biomed. Mater. 2023, 18, 042001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. D’Ambrosio, C.; Arena, S.; Scaloni, A.; Guerrier, L.; Boschetti, E.; Mendieta, M.E.; Citterio, A.; Righetti, P.G. Exploring the chicken egg white proteome with combinatorial peptide ligand libraries. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 3461–3474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wong, M.; Hendrix, M.J.; von der Mark, K.; Little, C.; Stern, R. Collagen in the egg shell membranes of the hen. Dev. Biol. 1984, 104, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Leach, R.M., Jr. Biochemistry of the organic matrix of the eggshell. Poult. Sci. 1982, 61, 2040–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Rønning, S.B.; Berg, R.S.; Høst, V.; Veiseth-Kent, E.; Wilhelmsen, C.R.; Haugen, E.; Suso, H.P.; Barham, P.; Schmidt, R.; Pedersen, M.E. Processed eggshell membrane powder is a promising biomaterial for use in tissue engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ahmed, T.A.; Suso, H.P.; Maqbool, A.; Hincke, M.T. Processed eggshell membrane powder: Bioinspiration for an innovative wound healing product. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 95, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Lenselink, E.A. Role of fibronectin in normal wound healing. Int. Wound J. 2015, 12, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Si, J.; Wang, C.; Zhang, D.; Wang, B.; Hou, W.; Zhou, Y. Osteopontin in bone metabolism and bone diseases. Med. Sci. Monit. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res. 2020, 26, e919159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Scatena, M.; Liaw, L.; Giachelli, C.M. Osteopontin: A multifunctional molecule regulating chronic inflammation and vascular disease. Arterioscler.Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2007, 27, 2302–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Sodhi, H.; Panitch, A. Glycosaminoglycans in tissue engineering: A review. Biomolecules 2020, 11, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Kalman, D.S.; Hewlings, S. The effect of oral hydrolyzed eggshell membrane on the appearance of hair, skin, and nails in healthy middle-aged adults: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2020, 19, 1463–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Mensah, R.A.; Jo, S.B.; Kim, H.; Park, S.M.; Patel, K.D.; Cho, K.J.; Cook, M.T.; Kirton, S.B.; Hutter, V.; Sidney, L.E.; et al. The eggshell membrane: A potential biomaterial for corneal wound healing. J. Biomater. Appl. 2021, 36, 912–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Coover, D. The use of egg membrane in ophthalmic surgery. Ophthal. Record 1899, 8, 222–224. [Google Scholar]
  122. Choi, J.; Lee, J.; Shin, M.E.; Been, S.; Lee, D.H.; Khang, G. Eggshell membrane/gellan gum composite hydrogels with in-creased degradability, biocompatibility, and anti-swelling properties for effective regeneration of retinal pigment epithe-lium. Polymers 2020, 12, 2941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Briggs, E.; Mensah, R.A.; Patel, K.D.; Mandakhbayar, N.E.; Sharifulden, N.S.; Erdogan, Z.K.; Silva, L.V.B.; Salim, K.; Kim, H.W.; Nguyen, L.T.; et al. Therapeutic application of an Ag-nanoparticle-PNIPAAm-modified eggshell membrane construct for dermal regeneration and reconstruction. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Mensah, R.A.; Cook, M.T.; Kirton, S.B.; Hutter, V.; San Chau, D.Y. A drug-incorporated-microparticle-eggshell-membrane-scaffold (DIMES) dressing: A novel biomaterial for localised wound regeneration. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2023, 190, 258–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Mensah, R.A.; Trotta, F.; Briggs, E.; Sharifulden, N.S.; Silva, L.V.B.; Keskin-Erdogan, Z.; Diop, S.; Kureshi, A.K.; Chau, D.Y. A sustainable, green-processed, Ag-nanoparticle-incorporated eggshell-derived biomaterial for wound-healing applications. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Corneal and non-corneal stem cells used in corneal epithelium regeneration [76].
Figure 1. Corneal and non-corneal stem cells used in corneal epithelium regeneration [76].
Medicina 61 01819 g001
Figure 2. Schematic outlining the structure of the eggshell membrane in relation to a typical egg.
Figure 2. Schematic outlining the structure of the eggshell membrane in relation to a typical egg.
Medicina 61 01819 g002
Table 1. Biomolecules found within the ESM that allow translation of the ESM into ocular-specific tissue engineering applications.
Table 1. Biomolecules found within the ESM that allow translation of the ESM into ocular-specific tissue engineering applications.
ESM ComponentBenefits of Molecules in Tissue Engineering References
Collagen- Acts as a scaffold to facilitate cell seeding and adherence
- Type V collagen maintains structural integrity and tensile strength of the ESM
[113,114]
Fibronectin- Facilitates cellular adhesion, growth, migration, and repair[115]
Osteopontin- Has an immunomodulatory effect on the host by regulating cytokine release and macrophage recruitment [116,117]
GlycosaminoglycansHyaluronic acid- Maintains viscoelasticity via water retention, promotes ECM secretion, reduces inflammation, and is involved in every step of wound healing [118]
Heparin- Has a high affinity to growth factors, which allows easy modification of ESM to promote growth and healing
Chondroitin sulfate- Promotes cellular adhesion and induces cellular differentiation
Keratan sulfate- Aids the control of charge and ion gradients needed for cellular adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation
Amino Acids- Amino acids found in high abundance in the ESM include proline, cysteine, glycine, glutamine, and asparagine
- Important for collagen and protein synthesis needed to maintain the ECM matrix
- Impacts metabolic and physiologic processes such as cellular proliferation which can act as an energy substrate
[119]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dhallu, S.K.; Pritchard, M.J.; Chau, D.Y.S.; Kirton, S.B. Current and Emerging Approaches in the Management of Severe Ocular Surface Disease. Medicina 2025, 61, 1819. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101819

AMA Style

Dhallu SK, Pritchard MJ, Chau DYS, Kirton SB. Current and Emerging Approaches in the Management of Severe Ocular Surface Disease. Medicina. 2025; 61(10):1819. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101819

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dhallu, Sandeep K., Molly J. Pritchard, David Y. S. Chau, and Stewart B. Kirton. 2025. "Current and Emerging Approaches in the Management of Severe Ocular Surface Disease" Medicina 61, no. 10: 1819. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101819

APA Style

Dhallu, S. K., Pritchard, M. J., Chau, D. Y. S., & Kirton, S. B. (2025). Current and Emerging Approaches in the Management of Severe Ocular Surface Disease. Medicina, 61(10), 1819. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101819

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop