Next Article in Journal
Uridine Derivatives: Synthesis, Biological Evaluation, and In Silico Studies as Antimicrobial and Anticancer Agents
Previous Article in Journal
High Fat Diet Exaggerate Metabolic and Reproductive PCOS Features by Promoting Oxidative Stress: An Improved EV Model in Rats
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 59
Issue 6
10.3390/medicina59061105
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationship between the Young’s Modulus of the Achilles Tendon and Ankle Dorsiflexion Angle at Maximum Squat Depth in Healthy Young Males

by
Hayato Miyasaka
1,*,
Bungo Ebihara
2,
Takashi Fukaya
3 and
Hirotaka Mutsuzaki
4,5
1
Department of Rehabilitation, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, 4-1-1 Otsuno, Tsuchiura 300-0028, Ibaraki, Japan
2
Department of Rehabilitation, JA Toride Medical Center, 2-1-1 Hongo, Toride 302-0022, Ibaraki, Japan
3
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tsukuba International University, 6-8-33 Manabe, Tsuchiura 300-0051, Ibaraki, Japan
4
Center for Medical Science, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ami 300-0394, Ibaraki, Japan
5
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences Hospital, Ami 300-0331, Ibaraki, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2023, 59(6), 1105; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061105
Submission received: 1 May 2023 / Revised: 2 June 2023 / Accepted: 6 June 2023 / Published: 7 June 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and Objective: Achilles tendon (AT) stiffness can reduce ankle dorsiflexion. However, whether AT stiffness affects the ankle dorsiflexion angle at a maximum squat depth remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the Young’s modulus of the AT and ankle dorsiflexion angle at the maximum squat depth in healthy young males using shear-wave elastography (SWE). Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 31 healthy young males. AT stiffness was measured using the Young’s modulus through SWE. The ankle dorsiflexion angle at the maximum squat depth was measured as the angle between the vertical line to the floor and the line connecting the fibula head and the lateral malleolus using a goniometer. Results: Multiple regression analysis identified the Young’s modulus of the AT at 10° of ankle dorsiflexion (standardized partial regression coefficient [β] = −0.461; p = 0.007) and the ankle dorsiflexion angle in the flexed knee (β = 0.340; p = 0.041) as independent variables for the ankle dorsiflexion angle at maximum squat depth. Conclusions: The Young’s modulus of the AT may affect the ankle dorsiflexion angle at the maximum squat depth in healthy young males. Therefore, improving the Young’s modulus of the AT may help increase the ankle dorsiflexion angle at maximum squat depth.

1. Introduction

Deep squatting is a motion involving total body flexion that can be used to evaluate functional movement [1,2]. It is routinely performed by Asians during daily life activities and farmwork [3,4]. However, an Achilles tendon (AT) rupture can lead to an inability to perform deep squatting [5], and such an injury could negatively impact employment. Therefore, improving the deep squatting motion may help accelerate the patient’s return to work.
Ankle dorsiflexion flexibility has been shown to influence deep squatting motion [6]. Kim et al. (2015) reported that the ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) is a major factor affecting squat depth in both sexes and is critical to increasing ankle joint mobility [7]. Chang et al. (2021) also reported that ankle dorsiflexion ROM correlates with AT stiffness [8]. However, whether AT stiffness affects the ankle dorsiflexion angle at maximum squat depth remains unclear.
Methods for estimating tissue stiffness using ultrasound-based shear-wave elastography (SWE) have been proposed by previous studies [9,10]. Notably, SWE has been increasingly used to assess tendon stiffness [11,12], which is represented in terms of Young’s modulus. With the measurement of the shear-wave propagation velocity distribution in the tissues, SWE produces numerical data in kilopascals (kPa) [9]. Young’s modulus (E), which is a measure of tissue stiffness, is calculated as follows: E = 3ρc2; Young’s modulus, E; tissue density, ρ; and shear wave velocity, c [13]. An elevated Young’s modulus signifies the stiffness of the tissue. SWE can measure the Young’s modulus of an AT with high reliability [11,14]; therefore, assessing the Young’s modulus of the AT may be a useful method for predicting the ankle dorsiflexion angle at maximum squat depth. Additionally, SWE is expected to be useful in the evaluation of rehabilitation programs, provide an early diagnosis, and detect injury risk in the assessment of tendon pathology [15]. An AT rupture occurs most frequently in young males [16]. Therefore, evaluating the Young’s modulus of the AT in young males may help prevent AT rupture.
Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the relationship between the Young’s modulus of the AT and the ankle dorsiflexion angle at maximum squat depth in healthy young males. We hypothesized that the Young’s modulus of the AT affects the ankle dorsiflexion angle at the maximum squat depth. Furthermore, if this hypothesis is proven, improving the Young’s modulus of the AT may help increase the ankle dorsiflexion angle at the maximum squat depth.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Overall, 31 healthy young males participated in this study. The participants’ characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The dominant leg was assessed by asking the participants which leg they would use to kick a ball [17]. The right foot of all participants was measured. Participants were included if they had a maximum ankle dorsiflexion ROM of at least 10°; had no fever, joint pain, or muscle pain; and could understand and sign the consent form. In contrast, participants were excluded if they had a history of neuromuscular disease or musculoskeletal injury to the lower limbs. The same physical therapist, with 5 years of experience on musculoskeletal ultrasound examinations, assessed each participant for tendon health through palpation and B-mode ultrasound. None of the participants exhibited tendinopathy-related swelling or hypoechoic areas in the tendon.
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the institute, and the study protocol was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Measurement of Ankle Dorsiflexion ROM

The patients were placed supine, and ankle dorsiflexion ROM was measured in the extended- and flexed-knee positions using a goniometer with a minimum value of 1°. During measurement, the fulcrum of the goniometer was centered over the lateral malleolus, the stationary arm was aligned with the long axis of the fibula, and the movement arm was parallel to the fifth metatarsal.

2.3. Measurement of the Ankle Dorsiflexion Angle at the Maximum Squat Depth

The participants were instructed to bodyweight squat to the maximal depth position they could maintain for 3 s to measure the ankle dorsiflexion angle at maximum squat depth. They were also instructed to stand with their feet shoulder-width apart with their arms extended forward, parallel to the floor, while maintaining a straight line of vision. Participants were instructed to maintain heel contact during the task. Ankle dorsiflexion was measured using a goniometer as the angle between the vertical line to the floor and the line connecting the fibula head and lateral malleolus (Figure 1), with a minimum value of 1°.

2.4. Measurement of Ankle Plantar/Dorsiflexion Strength

The ankle joints’ muscles were assessed for strength using a Biodex 3 dynamometer (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY, USA). The participants were in a sitting position, with 30° of knee flexion. The lower trunk, thigh, and ankle muscles were stabilized using straps. Bilateral isokinetic (concentric/concentric) ankle plantar/dorsiflexion measurements were performed, and two sets of five maximal dynamic repetitions were conducted at an angular velocity of 60°/s, with a 30-s interval between these sets. Each participant was positioned with their feet parallel to the floor to avoid hamstring action during the test. Finally, the peak torque was measured at a minimum of 1 Nm, and peak torque/body weight was calculated.

2.5. Measurement of the Young’s Modulus of the AT

Ultrasound examinations were performed using a 2–10 MHz linear transducer (Supersonic Imaging, Aix-en-Provence, France). The same physical therapist, with 5 years of experience in musculoskeletal ultrasound examinations, assessed the Young’s modulus using the SWE Opt penetration mode. The Young’s modulus range for the AT was 0–800 kPa. The participants were measured in the kneeling position with 90° of knee flexion and the upper body supported by a table (Figure 2). We instructed the participants to remain relaxed during the measurements. Ultrasound images were recorded along the longitudinal axis of the tendon at ankle dorsiflexion angles of −10°, 0°, and 10°. The ankle joint was securely attached to the tilt table footplate. AT fibers and the transducer were made parallel and the AT region was defined as 3 cm above the calcaneal tuberosity [18]. Furthermore, the skin surface was marked with a black pen, and the probe was kept stationary for 10 s with a 3-mm-diameter region of interest (ROI) circle [19]. The ROI was set near the center of the AT (Figure 3). Therefore, to reduce the effect of pressure, a generous amount of gel was applied, and the probe was carefully positioned over the skin. However, measurements of each ankle position were taken at −10°, 0°, and 10° of dorsiflexion in the specified order to lessen the impact of stretching.
Fifteen minutes after the initial measurement, the measurements were repeated to assess reliability [12]. The average Young’s modulus of the first and second measurements was used to calculate the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The ICC (1.1) values of the Young’s modulus at −10°, 0°, and 10° of ankle dorsiflexion were 0.968, 0.959, and 0.958, respectively.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

A power analysis of the multiple regression, with an effect size f2 of 0.35, an error probability of 0.05, a power of 0.8, and two predictors, was performed using the ankle dorsiflexion angle at maximum squat depth as the dependent variable. Using G*Power 3.1 [20], a power analysis was conducted, and 31 participants were included in the study. The distribution of the measured values was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Means and standard deviation were used to describe normally distributed data; otherwise, the medians and interquartile ranges were computed.
One-way repeated measures, analysis of variance, and Bonferroni post hoc test were used to demonstrate the effects of ankle position. Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficients were used to analyze the correlations between relationships. The ankle dorsiflexion angle at the maximum squat depth was used as the dependent variable in the stepwise multiple regression analysis.
Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® statistics version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Participants’ Measured Values

The participants’ measured values are summarized in Table 2. The mean ankle dorsiflexion ROM in the extended knee, the flexed knee, and at the maximum squat depth was 16.5 ± 3.3°, 22.8 ± 3.6°, and 38.8 ± 7.0°, respectively.

3.2. Young’s Modulus of the AT at −10°, 0°, and 10° of Ankle Dorsiflexion

The differences in the Young’s modulus between the ankle positions are summarized in Figure 4. The mean Young’s modulus of the AT at −10°, 0°, and 10° of ankle dorsiflexion was 323.9 ± 48.7°, 400.1 ± 45.6°, and 501.7 ± 32.6°, respectively. One-way repeated measures analysis of variance showed the significant main effects of the ankle position. The Young’s modulus varied significantly among all angles (p < 0.001), according to post hoc analysis, and the values of the Young’s modulus increased as the ankle dorsiflexed (Figure 4).

3.3. Correlation Coefficients

The correlations between the ankle dorsiflexion angle at the maximum squat depth and other measurement values are shown in Table 3. The ankle dorsiflexion angle at maximum squat depth correlated with the Young’s modulus of the AT at 10° of ankle dorsiflexion (r = −0.640; p < 0.001), ankle dorsiflexion ROM in the extended knee (r = 0.441; p = 0.013), and ankle dorsiflexion ROM in the flexed knee (r = 0.583; p < 0.001). The other measurement parameters were not significantly correlated (p > 0.05).

3.4. Multiple Regression Analysis

The results of the multiple regression analysis are presented in Table 4. The Young’s modulus of the AT at 10° (p = 0.007) and the ankle dorsiflexion angle in the flexed knee (p = 0.041) were selected as independent variables. The multiple correlation coefficient, coefficient of determination (R2), and adjusted coefficient of determination (adjusted R2) were 0.702, 0.493, and 0.457, respectively. The Durbin–Watson ratio was 2.169, and the residuals were normally distributed (p = 0.366). The regression formula is as follows:
Ankle dorsiflexion angle at maximum squat depth (°) = 66.844–0.089 × Young’s modulus of the AT at 10° of ankle dorsiflexion (kPa) + 0.596 × ankle dorsiflexion ROM in the flexed knee (°).

4. Discussion

We investigated the relationship between the Young’s modulus of the AT and the ankle dorsiflexion angle at the maximum squat depth in healthy young males using SWE. The results showed that the ankle dorsiflexion angle at the maximum squat depth may reduce as the Young’s modulus of the AT increases in healthy young males.
It has been suggested that deep squatting requires a large ankle dorsiflexion ROM. However, ankle dorsiflexion ROM may be influenced by AT stiffness [21], capsular tightness, soft tissue restrictions of the foot, and posterior lower leg musculature [22]. Therefore, if the Young’s modulus of the AT of ankle dorsiflexion at 10° increases, it may lead to limited ankle dorsiflexion movement, which would make it more difficult to bend the ankle to the observed ankle dorsiflexion angle of 23.4°–25.9° at the maximum squatting depth [23].
Moreover, the Young’s modulus of the AT increased as the ankle dorsiflexed. The three-headed triceps surae, which comprises the gastrocnemius and soleus, works to plantar flex the ankle joint through its associated tendon, which is the AT [24]. The gastrocnemius and soleus are elongated during ankle dorsiflexion [25]; therefore, a passive tension is generated in the AT with ankle dorsiflexion, which can increase the Young’s modulus of the AT.
Clinically, assessing the Young’s modulus of the AT using SWE may help identify areas of AT stiffness. The AT is the biggest tendon in the human body and is one of the most frequently injured tendons [26]. Tavares et al. (2014) reported that fibrosis in the tendon and surrounding area causes AT to stiffen and lose its elasticity after healing [27]. Consequently, ankle dorsiflexion is limited after an AT rupture. Regarding acute AT ruptures, early rehabilitation is encouraged to promote functional improvement [28,29]. Therefore, rehabilitation after AT rupture may improve the Young’s modulus of stiff areas of the AT by increasing the flexibility of the three-headed triceps surae to increase the ankle dorsiflexion angle at maximum squat depth.
This study had some limitations. First, this study only included healthy young males; therefore, our findings cannot be generalized to the entire population. Therefore, corresponding studies with participants of different ages and sexes should be conducted in the future. Second, electromyography was not used during SWE measurements. Consequently, monitoring muscle activity is necessary to ensure no muscle contraction. Third, Young’s modulus only considers the AT. Therefore, the Young’s modulus of muscles, such as the triceps surae, should also be examined to discover a factor that confirms the relationship between ankle dorsiflexion angle at maximum squat depth and the Young’s modulus of the AT is specifically related to the tendon. Finally, inter-rater reliability was not assessed. The measurement of the Young’s modulus depends on the skill of the examiner [30]. Therefore, whether the measured Young’s modulus of the AT is comparable between the different examiners is unclear. Further studies are warranted to investigate the Young’s modulus of AT in individuals with AT disorders.

5. Conclusions

The Young’s modulus of the AT may affect the ankle dorsiflexion angle at the maximum squat depth in healthy young males. Clinically, improving the Young’s modulus of the AT may help increase the ankle dorsiflexion angle at maximum squat depth.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.M. (Hayato Miyasaka), B.E., T.F. and H.M. (Hirotaka Mutsuzaki); Formal analysis, H.M. (Hayato Miyasaka), B.E., T.F. and H.M. (Hirotaka Mutsuzaki); Investigation, H.M. (Hayato Miyasaka), B.E., T.F. and H.M. (Hirotaka Mutsuzaki); Methodology, H.M. (Hayato Miyasaka), B.E., T.F. and H.M. (Hirotaka Mutsuzaki); Project administration, H.M. (Hirotaka Mutsuzaki); Supervision, H.M. (Hirotaka Mutsuzaki); Writing—original draft, H.M. (Hayato Miyasaka); Writing—review and editing, B.E., T.F. and H.M. (Hirotaka Mutsuzaki). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital (approval number: 2022FY127; date of approval: 30 November 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available, owing to restrictions on their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cook, G.; Burton, L.; Hoogenboom, B. Pre-participation screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function-part 1. N. Am. J. Sport. Phys. Ther. 2006, 1, 62–72. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lui, T.K.S.; Tsang, S.M.H.; Kwok, A.W.L. Changes in lumbopelvic movement and muscle recruitment associated with prolonged deep squatting: A pilot study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Chung, M.K.; Lee, I.; Kee, D. Effect of stool height and holding time on postural load of squatting postures. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2003, 32, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kasuyama, T.; Sakamoto, M.; Nakazawa, R. Ankle joint dorsiflexion measurement using the deep squatting posture. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2009, 21, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Won Lee, K.; Bae, J.Y.; Ho, B.C.; Kim, J.H.; Seo, D.K. Immediate weightbearing and ankle motion exercise after acute Achilles tendon rupture repair. J. Foot. Ankle. Surg. 2022, 61, 604–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. McMillian, D.J.; Rynders, Z.G.; Trudeau, T.R. Modifying the functional movement screen deep squat test: The effect of foot and arm positional variations. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2016, 30, 973–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, S.H.; Kwon, O.Y.; Park, K.N.; Jeon, I.C.; Weon, J.H. Lower extremity strength and the range of motion in relation to squat depth. J. Hum. Kinet. 2015, 45, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Chang, T.T.; Li, Z.; Zhu, Y.C.; Wang, X.Q.; Zhang, Z.J. Effects of self-myofascial release using a foam roller on the stiffness of the gastrocnemius-Achilles tendon complex and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 718827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gennisson, J.L.; Deffieux, T.; Fink, M.; Tanter, M. Ultrasound elastography: Principles and techniques. Diagn. Interv. Imaging 2013, 94, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Taljanovic, M.S.; Gimber, L.H.; Becker, G.W.; Latt, L.D.; Klauser, A.S.; Melville, D.M.; Gao, L.; Witte, R.S. Shear-wave elastography: Basic physics and musculoskeletal applications. Radiographics 2017, 37, 855–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Feng, Y.N.; Li, Y.P.; Liu, C.L.; Zhang, Z.J. Assessing the elastic properties of skeletal muscle and tendon using shearwave ultrasound elastography and MyotonPRO. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ebihara, B.; Mutsuzaki, H.; Fukaya, T. Relationships between quadriceps tendon elasticity and knee flexion angle in young healthy adults. Medicina 2019, 55, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Bercoff, J.; Tanter, M.; Fink, M. Supersonic shear imaging: A new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2004, 51, 396–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Leung, W.K.C.; Chu, K.L.; Lai, C. Sonographic evaluation of the immediate effects of eccentric heel drop exercise on Achilles tendon and gastrocnemius muscle stiffness using shear wave elastography. PeerJ 2017, 5, e3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Prado-Costa, R.; Rebelo, J.; Monteiro-Barroso, J.; Preto, A.S. Ultrasound elastography: Compression elastography and shear-wave elastography in the assessment of tendon injury. Insights Imaging 2018, 17, 791–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lemme, N.J.; Li, N.Y.; DeFroda, S.F.; Kleiner, J.; Owens, B.D. Epidemiology of Achilles tendon ruptures in the United States: Athletic and nonathletic injuries from 2012 to 2016. Orthop. J. Sport. Med. 2018, 6, 62325967118808238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Brophy, R.; Silvers, H.J.; Gonzales, T.; Mandelbaum, B.R. Gender influences: The role of leg dominance in ACL injury among soccer players. Br. J. Sport. Med. 2010, 44, 694–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Haen, T.X.; Roux, A.; Soubeyrand, M.; Laporte, S. Shear waves elastography for assessment of human Achilles tendon’s biomechanical properties: An experimental study. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2017, 69, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zardi, E.M.; Pipita, M.E.; Giorgi, C.; Afeltra, A.; Maffulli, N.; Franceschi, F. Strain ultrasound elastography in the Achilles tendon of ankylosing spondylitis patients treated with anti-TNF-α: A preliminary study. Vivo 2019, 33, 1635–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Buchner, A.; Lang, A.-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 2009, 41, 1149–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gomes, J.; Neto, T.; Vaz, J.R.; Schoenfeld, B.J.; Freitas, S.R. Is there a relationship between back squat depth, ankle flexibility, and Achilles tendon stiffness? Sport. Biomech. 2022, 21, 782–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Myer, G.D.; Kushner, A.M.; Brent, J.L.; Schoenfeld, B.J.; Hugentobler, J.; Lloyd, R.S.; Vermeil, A.; Chu, D.A.; Harbin, J.; McGill, S.M. The back squat: A proposed assessment of functional deficits and technical factors that limit performance. Strength Cond. J. 2014, 36, 4–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Endo, Y.; Miura, M.; Sakamoto, M. The relationship between the deep squat movement and the hip, knee and ankle range of motion and muscle strength. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2020, 32, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Del Buono, A.; Chan, O.; Maffulli, N. Achilles tendon: Functional anatomy and novel emerging models of imaging classification. Int. Orthop. 2013, 37, 715–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Saeki, J.; Ikezoe, T.; Nakamura, M.; Nishishita, S.; Ichihashi, N. The reliability of shear elastic modulus measurement of the ankle plantar flexion muscles is higher at dorsiflexed position of the ankle. J. Foot. Ankle. Res. 2017, 10, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Józsa, L.; Kvist, M.; Bálint, B.J.; Reffy, A.; Järvinen, M.; Lehto, M.; Barzo, M. The role of recreational sport activity in Achilles tendon rupture. A clinical, pathoanatomical, and sociological study of 292 cases. Am. J. Sport. Med. 1989, 17, 338–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tavares, W.C., Jr.; de Castro, U.B.; Paulino, E., Jr.; de Souza Vasconcellos, L.; Madureira, A.P.; Magalhães, M.A.B.; Mendes, D.V.M.; Kakehasi, A.M.; Resende, V. Healing of the Achilles tendon in rabbits—Evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2014, 9, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Brumann, M.; Baumbach, S.F.; Mutschler, W.; Polzer, H. Accelerated rehabilitation following Achilles tendon repair after acute rupture—Development of an evidence-based treatment protocol. Injury 2014, 45, 1782–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Tarantino, D.; Palermi, S.; Sirico, F.; Corrado, B. Achilles tendon rupture: Mechanisms of injury, principles of rehabilitation and return to play. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2020, 5, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hirayama, K.; Akagi, R.; Takahashi, H. Reliability of ultrasound elastography for the quantification of transversus abdominis elasticity. Acta. Radiol. Open 2015, 4, 2058460115603420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Medicina 59 01105 g001 550
Figure 1. Measurement of ankle dorsiflexion angle at the maximum squat depth. Ankle dorsiflexion was measured as the angle between the vertical line to the floor and the line connecting the fibula head and lateral malleolus.
Figure 1. Measurement of ankle dorsiflexion angle at the maximum squat depth. Ankle dorsiflexion was measured as the angle between the vertical line to the floor and the line connecting the fibula head and lateral malleolus.
Medicina 59 01105 g001
Medicina 59 01105 g002 550
Figure 2. Measurement position of the Young’s modulus of the Achilles tendon during passive ankle dorsiflexion at (a) −10°, (b) 0°, and (c) 10°. The participants were measured while kneeling, with 90° of knee flexion and the upper body supported by a table. The ankle joint was attached to the tilt table footplate.
Figure 2. Measurement position of the Young’s modulus of the Achilles tendon during passive ankle dorsiflexion at (a) −10°, (b) 0°, and (c) 10°. The participants were measured while kneeling, with 90° of knee flexion and the upper body supported by a table. The ankle joint was attached to the tilt table footplate.
Medicina 59 01105 g002
Medicina 59 01105 g003 550
Figure 3. Representative images of the elasticity maps of the Achilles tendon (AT) during passive ankle dorsiflexion at (a) −10°, (b) 0°, and (c) 10°. (d) Grey and color scale. Images represent the changes in color according to stiffness and region of interest position.
Figure 3. Representative images of the elasticity maps of the Achilles tendon (AT) during passive ankle dorsiflexion at (a) −10°, (b) 0°, and (c) 10°. (d) Grey and color scale. Images represent the changes in color according to stiffness and region of interest position.
Medicina 59 01105 g003
Medicina 59 01105 g004 550
Figure 4. Comparison of the Young’s modulus of the Achilles tendon at −10°, 0°, and 10° of ankle dorsiflexion. * One-way repeated measures analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc test detected significant differences among all angles (p < 0.001). The Young’s modulus is represented as the mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 4. Comparison of the Young’s modulus of the Achilles tendon at −10°, 0°, and 10° of ankle dorsiflexion. * One-way repeated measures analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc test detected significant differences among all angles (p < 0.001). The Young’s modulus is represented as the mean ± standard deviation.
Medicina 59 01105 g004
Table
Table 1. Participants’ physical characteristics (n = 31).
Table 1. Participants’ physical characteristics (n = 31).
Age (years)27.0 (25.0–34.0)
Height (m)1.73 (1.70–1.75)
Weight (kg)64.3 (59.9–68.0)
Body mass index (kg/m2)21.5 (20.7–22.6)
Dominant leg (right/left)28/3
Values are presented as medians (interquartile ranges) or n/n.
Table
Table 2. Participants’ measured values (n = 31).
Table 2. Participants’ measured values (n = 31).
Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (°)
Extended knee16.5 ± 3.3
Flexed knee22.8 ± 3.6
Maximum squat depth38.8 ± 7.0
Ankle strength (Nm/kg)
Plantar flexion0.5 ± 0.1
Dorsiflexion1.0 ± 0.3
Values are presented as means ± standard deviation.
Table
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the ankle dorsiflexion angle at maximum squat depth and other measurement values.
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the ankle dorsiflexion angle at maximum squat depth and other measurement values.
MeasurementsAnkle Dorsiflexion Angle at Maximum Squat Depth
rp Value
Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion
Extended knee0.4410.013 **
Flexed knee0.583<0.001 *
Young’s modulus of the Achilles tendon−0.640<0.001 *
Ankle strength
Plantar flexion0.1810.329
Dorsiflexion−0.0060.973
* Correlation was significant at p = 0.01. ** Correlation was significant at p = 0.05.
Table
Table 4. Multiple regression analysis results.
Table 4. Multiple regression analysis results.
VariablesB95% CI of Bp-ValueβVIF
Constant66.84426.868–106.8200.002
Young’s modulus of the Achilles tendon (kPa)−0.089−0.152 to −0.0260.007−0.4611.386
Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion in the flexed knee (°)0.5960.027–1.1650.0410.3401.386
B: partial regression coefficient; CI: confidence interval; β: standardized partial regression coefficient; VIF: variance inflation factor.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miyasaka, H.; Ebihara, B.; Fukaya, T.; Mutsuzaki, H. Relationship between the Young’s Modulus of the Achilles Tendon and Ankle Dorsiflexion Angle at Maximum Squat Depth in Healthy Young Males. Medicina 2023, 59, 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061105

AMA Style

Miyasaka H, Ebihara B, Fukaya T, Mutsuzaki H. Relationship between the Young’s Modulus of the Achilles Tendon and Ankle Dorsiflexion Angle at Maximum Squat Depth in Healthy Young Males. Medicina. 2023; 59(6):1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miyasaka, Hayato, Bungo Ebihara, Takashi Fukaya, and Hirotaka Mutsuzaki. 2023. "Relationship between the Young’s Modulus of the Achilles Tendon and Ankle Dorsiflexion Angle at Maximum Squat Depth in Healthy Young Males" Medicina 59, no. 6: 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061105

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop