Next Article in Journal
Association of Proteus mirabilis and Providencia stuartii Infections with Diabetes
Previous Article in Journal
The Relationship between Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Postoperative Delirium in Patients Undergoing Spinal Fusion Surgery: Clinical Data Warehouse Analysis
 
 
Case Report
Peer-Review Record

A Challenging Nodular Lesion of the Ear

Medicina 2022, 58(2), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58020269
by Antonella Tammaro 1, Carmen Cantisani 2,*, Camilla Chello 1,3, Ganiyat Adenike Ralitsa Adebanjo 1, Lavinia Lilli 4, Francesca Farnetani 2, Chiara Filippi 5, Edoardo Covelli 1, Evelina Rogges 6 and Giovanni Pellacani 2,3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Medicina 2022, 58(2), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58020269
Submission received: 30 December 2021 / Revised: 24 January 2022 / Accepted: 7 February 2022 / Published: 11 February 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a very unusual report of Merkel cell carcinoma. The tumor is overall rare and involvement fo the ear is quite exceptional. I think that the paper may be very helpeful for the Clinicians to improve their diagnostic skills.

Only a few suggestions:

please check English language

there are some typing errors in the text; please check and correct

Insert the following artcile in the text and references: 

Gioacchini, F. M., Postacchini, V., Simonetti, O., Offidani, A., Magliulo, G., & Re, M. (2013). Merkel cell carcinoma: a systematic review of ENT presentations. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 270(8), 2191–2199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2283-1

Author Response

Thanks for the suggestion we improved english language and typing errors and we inserte the suggested manuscript

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you to Authors, Editors and Editorial Staff for giving me the opportunity to peer review the current manuscript, which aims to present a case report on Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Although MCC is a rare and aggressive tumour representing nowadays a challenge in the dermatologic field, this paper raises some concerns

 

Nothing new is contributed to scientific knowledge and authors have not generated hypotheses, presented new findings or ideas that could represent an advance for the prevention, diagnosis, prognosis or therapy of this disease. Furthermore, many publications are easily found on this disease. The conduction of the simple following search strategy on MEDLINE/PubMed: ("Carcinoma, Merkel Cell"[mh]) retrieved 2,827 results, being 1,088 of them categorized as case reports according to the pertinent publication type filter.

 

Finally, the paper should have been much better elaborated, important topics presented in the introduction were not a posteriori discussed and important references are missing.

Author Response

As suggested we tried to improve our manuscript unfortunately the patient died and we were not able to speculate on this case

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This is a interesting case report regarding the diagnostic challenge of nodular malignant lesions of the skin related to a Merkel cell carcinoma..

I have minor comments to this paper

Line 31. (no clear) delete with all their histopathological variants 

Line 31/32 Add Atypical Fibroxanthoma  and Kaposi in the differential diagnosis

Case report

Clinical features are very impressive in this case. Dermoscopy has been performed  ?

Discussion :

The discussion may be reduced

Line 67.  cell carcinoma (CC) or  Merkel cell carcinoma MCC ??

Line 82 acronym  AEIOU (Asymptomatic/lack of tenderness, Expanding rapidly, Immune suppression, 83 Older than 5p years, and Ultraviolet-exposed/fair skin. A reference is needed.

To give to the reader additional diagnostical key points in the MCC early phase, I suggest to include dermoscopic features of MCC in the discussion.  C. Jalilian,1 A.J   Clinical and dermoscopic characteristics of Merkel cell carcinoma. British Journal of Dermatology (2013) 169, pp 294–297.

 

Author Response

Thanks for the possibility to improve our manuscript we followed Your suggestion and added suggested references.

Many thanks in advance

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop