Next Article in Journal
Vascular Diameter as Clue for the Diagnosis of Clinically and/or Dermoscopically Equivocal Pigmented and Non-Pigmented Basal Cell Carcinomas and Nodular Melanomas
Previous Article in Journal
Safety of Rigid Bronchoscopy for Therapeutic Intervention at the Intensive Care Unit Bedside
 
 
Case Report
Peer-Review Record

Delayed Diagnosis of Bilateral Neuroarthropathy: Serious Impact on the Development of Charcot’s Foot, a Case Report

Medicina 2022, 58(12), 1763; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58121763
by Tatiana Benard 1, Corinne Lequint 1, Anne Christine Jugnet 1, Marie Bouly 1, Thomas Winther 1, Alfred Penfornis 1,2 and Dured Dardari 1,3,*
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Medicina 2022, 58(12), 1763; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58121763
Submission received: 2 October 2022 / Revised: 8 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 30 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Endocrinology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Title

 Delayed diagnosis of bilateral presentation of neuroarthropa-thy, a serious impact on the development of charcot's foot, a case report

 

The authors discussed a case of charcot's arthropathy that deteriorated due to delayed diagnosis. Some important point need to be addressed .

Line

Manuscript

Comment

14

 

 Results:

The case should be presented first

14

 

 the case of a lady

English editing is mandatory

14

 

 the case of a lady

The authors should described the age of the case

15

 

 in only 4 months

English editing is mandatory

16

 

 but it was also multifocal, affecting both tarsal 16 joints.

The English writing needs revision

18

 

 none of the physicians consulted made a suspicion or a diagnosis of CN

The sentence is too hard to be understood

Abstract

 

The abstract is reluctant and the description of the case is not so interesting

The abstract should be written in attractive mannar to attract the readers

Conclusion 19-21

 

The conclusion not reflected by the case description

29

 

lysis, The clinical presentation of 29 CN :The

There is something wrong with the use of capital and small letters and the use of punctuation

35

 

 Eichenholtz [2]. (assessment

Here again

39

 

 where magnetic 39 resonance imaging

In appropriate insertion of abbreviation and their meanings

 

 

The introduction should also more interesting and attractable to the authors

Patients and Methods

 

I think case presentation will be more appropriate as a  title than patients and methods

Our patient was aged 24 years

 

Not a scientific writing

oedema present from 55 more than 4 months

 

The sentence structure is not appropriate

56

both joints presenting an inflammatory aspect

What is meant by inflammatory aspect

68

The clinical 68 history of the patient shows the presence of an HbA1c level of

This is not a clinical history .This is laboratory data

Case presentation

 

Should be mentioned in a chronological manner

 

 

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer: many thanks for your comments, attached are the responses to your comments 

Kindly regards 

Dured Dardari

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Paper does not give us novelties. Nevertheless, the message you want to highlight is very important as to date the Charcot joint is often unrecognized and undiagnosed.

You should rearrange the description of the case improving the clinical features description and highlighting the moment in which somebody has had a wrong diagnosys, explaining why and how he should have done.

Plesase, be careful of the fluidity of sentences and the use of punctuation (some sentences need to be rewritten)

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

many thanks for your comments we have reviewed our entire manuscript and we hope that the new version will meet your expectations 

Kindly regards 

Dured Dardari 

Reviewer 3 Report

 

Many thanks to the authors for having presented a so interesting Case Report about “Delayed diagnosis of bilateral presentation of neuroarthropathy, a serious impact on the development of Charcot’s foot, a case report”.  Before resubmitting the revision version of the article, please read the editorial rules carefully, and check other editorial aspects, such as: text alignment (lacking), text justification at the head (lacking), etc. There are too many typing errors! The language is good enough. Please correct the title with italic, uppercase,  letter for Charcot foot.

 

Abstract

The abstract is well structured, and it contains the main information of the study.

 

Background

Although the introduction is quite well structured it is too short and shallow. Please make the introduction wider.

About operative management for Charcot foot please add minimally invasive techniques quoting the most recent reports presented in literature:

·       Distal Metatarsal Osteotomies for Chronic Plantar Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Foot Ankle Clin. 2022 Sep;27(3):545-566. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Aug 6. PMID: 36096551

·       Minimally invasive metatarsal osteotomies (Mimos) for the treatment of plantar diabetic forefoot ulcers (pdfus): A systematic review and meta‐analysis with meta‐regressions. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 2021, 11(20), 9628

Patients and Methods

This section contains enough information.

When was the sensitive neuropathy diagnosed? Please add images of RMI performed during follow up.

 

Discussion

The length and content of the discussion communicates the main information of the paper.

However, the case presented is not discussed adequately with data provide in literature, especially in relation to possible surgical techniques.

Lines 123-24: In addition to offloading, patients will often require management for the development of foot ulcers and possibly surgical reconstruction for disabling bone or joint deformity or instability.

Please discuss possible future surgical options for this case and quote respectively For bone reconstruction after immobilization in cast or boot:

·       Minimally Invasive Surgery for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Using a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail: Preliminary Results of an Innovative Modified Technique. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Nov-Dec;55(6):1130-1138. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

 

References

The references are not up to date. Hence, delate those before 2010 if not essential, replacing them with newer ones and integrate them as suggested previously.

 

Figures

 

The quality of figures is low. It would be advisable to add the clinical and radiographic images taken during follow-up.

Author Response

Dear reviewer many thanks for your comments we have reviewed our entire manuscript and we hope that the new version will meet your expectations 

Abstract

The abstract is well structured, and it contains the main information of the study.

Modification done

Although the introduction is quite well structured it is too short and shallow. Please make the introduction wider.

About operative management for Charcot foot please add minimally invasive techniques quoting the most recent reports presented in literature:

  • Distal Metatarsal Osteotomies for Chronic Plantar Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Foot Ankle Clin. 2022 Sep;27(3):545-566. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Aug 6. PMID: 36096551
  • Minimally invasive metatarsal osteotomies (Mimos) for the treatment of plantar diabetic forefoot ulcers (pdfus): A systematic review and meta‐analysis with meta‐regressions. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 2021, 11(20), 9628

 Many thanks for your comments : Modification done

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear author,

The reply to reviewer comments should be written in a scientific manner to indicate what has already been done. The paper as a whole is full of multiple caveats and not well written.

Reviewer 3 Report

The new references added must also reported the names of the authors. Please provide them.

Back to TopTop