Next Article in Journal
Survival and Chemosensitivity in Advanced High Grade Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients with and without a BRCA Germline Mutation: More Evidence for Shifting the Paradigm towards Complete Surgical Cytoreduction
Previous Article in Journal
Knowledge on the Use of Isotretinoin and Its Side Effects and Awareness towards Saudi FDA-Pregnancy Prevention Program among the Female Acne Patients: A Northern Saudi Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Influence of Malnutrition Measured by Hypalbuminemia and Body Mass Index on the Outcome of Geriatric Patients with a Fracture of the Proximal Femur

1
Department of Orthopedic and Emergency Surgery, Alfried Krupp Hospital, 45276 Essen, Germany
2
Center for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2022, 58(11), 1610; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111610
Submission received: 29 September 2022 / Revised: 2 November 2022 / Accepted: 3 November 2022 / Published: 7 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Surgery)

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Fractures of the proximal femur are a life-changing and life-threatening event for older people. Concomitant malnutrition has been described as an independent risk factor for complications and mortality. Therefore, we examined the influence of albumin and body mass index (BMI) as parameters for the nutritional state on the outcome after geriatric hip fracture surgery. Materials and Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from hospital information systems, and complications and all other parameters were obtained from patient charts. We included patients aged 70 years or above with a fracture of the proximal femur. We excluded periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures and patients with a missing BMI or albumin value. Results: Patients with a BMI below 20 kg/m2 were more likely to be female but did not differ from the normal BMI group in terms of baseline parameters. Patients with hypoalbuminemia had a higher ASA grade and Charlson Comorbidity Index, as well as a lower hemoglobin value and prothrombin time compared to those with normal albumin values and low BMI. Hypoalbuminemia was associated with significantly increased rates of complications (57.9% vs. 46.7%, p = 0.04) and mortality (10.3% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.02). Blood loss and transfusion rates were higher in the hypoalbuminemia group. Patients with a BMI below 20 kg/m2 had a higher risk of intraoperative cardiac arrest (2.6% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.05) but did not show higher mortality rates than patients with a BMI above 20 kg/m2. However, the outcome parameter could not be confirmed in the regression analysis. Conclusions: Hypoalbuminemia might be an indicator for more vulnerable patients with a compromised hemoglobin value, prothrombin time, and ASA grade. Therefore, it is also associated with higher mortality and postoperative complications. However, hypoalbuminemia was not an independent predictor for mortality or postoperative complications, but low albumin values were associated with a higher CCI and ASA grade than in patients with a BMI below 20 kg/m2.

1. Introduction

Fractures of the proximal femur are a life-changing and life-threatening event for older people, and despite special treatment protocols, mortality and morbidity are still high [1]. Concomitant malnutrition has been described as an independent risk factor for complications and mortality [2,3,4,5,6]. The prevalence of malnutrition in geriatric trauma patients in Germany is 30–50%, and among such patients, the highest prevalence is seen in patients with a fracture of the pelvis and proximal femur [4,7].
More and more studies are focusing on the influence of malnutrition on hospitalized patients, but only a minority of hospitals are screening for it [4,7,8,9]. Several clinical assessments, laboratory tests, and biometrical parameters are available, and some have been validated for geriatric patients, such as the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) [10]. Body mass index (BMI) seems to lack enough sensitivity for standalone screening concerning the prevalence of malnutrition. For example, the obesity paradox describes a positive correlation between survival and body weight in some diseases [11]. Nevertheless, it is nearly always available and easy to handle, so it is often part of malnutrition screening. Recent studies have proposed an optimal geriatric body mass index (BMI) regarding survival, which ranges from 23 to 29.9 kg/m2 [12,13].
Another critical point in relation to intervention studies in the field of malnutrition is the validation of outcome parameters. Weight alone, laboratory parameters, arm and ankle diameters, and lymphocyte count do not show a good correlation with nutritional intervention. Despite the knowledge of a potentially modifiable risk factor, surgeons are confronted with the dilemma of the need for prompt surgery, and it is obvious that malnutrition cannot be sufficiently addressed before time-critical surgery. Therefore, we conducted a study to analyze the influence of malnutrition based on BMI and serum albumin on the outcome of patients with a fracture of the proximal femur in a certificated geriatric trauma center.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Sources

Data were retrospectively collected from a hospital information system. Complications and all other parameters were obtained from patient charts.

2.2. Patients

The inclusion criteria were patients aged 70 years or above with a fracture of the proximal femur from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2019. A total of 856 patients were included. We excluded periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures and patients with a missing BMI or albumin value. Therefore, each analysis shows the total number of patients that could be included. All included patients were assessed as an emergency. Preoperative fasting was not mandatory. A high-calorie nutrition postoperatively was part of the postoperative care. Albumin or parenteral feeding were not routinely supplied due to low preoperative albumin values. Albumin was not measured postoperatively.

2.3. Covariates

The covariates measured included age, gender, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Grades 1–5 [14], and the Identification of Seniors At Risk (ISAR) score. The ISAR score ranges from 0 to 6, and the need for geriatric treatment is thought to be necessary for a score of 2 and above [15]. We also examined the use of oral anticoagulants, time to surgery, current residential status, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), preoperative laboratory results (hemoglobin, leucocytes, thrombocytes, C-Reactive Protein (CRP), International Normalized Ratio (INR), activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT), creatinine, and albumin), and the presence of injuries besides hip fracture. All complications during the in-hospital stay were measured, and intraoperative processes were analyzed (including central venous catheter, invasive blood pressure measurement, catecholamine, and fluids, as well as blood loss or bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS)). The perioperative complications were summarized using the Clavien–Dindo classification [16]. Malnutrition was assumed at albumin levels below or equal to 35 g/L or a BMI of 20 kg/m2 [17,18].

2.4. Outcomes

The primary outcome was mortality during the hospital stay. Other outcome parameters were peri- and postoperative complications measured with the Clavien–Dindo classification, intraoperative fluids, and the need for ICU treatment.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All calculations were performed using the statistics software R v. 4.0.2 (Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). For descriptive analyses, categorical data were presented as counts and percentages, and continuous variables were presented as the median and interquartile range (IQR). Comparisons between groups were made using the chi² test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon test for continuous variables. To verify the outcomes of patients according to their albumin value and BMI, patients were sorted into groups.
Linear models and logistic regression models were used to examine the impact of malnutrition on outcomes after controlling for the ISAR grade, ASA grade, sex, age, and type of proximal femur fracture. Results are reported as regression coefficients (ß) for linear regression and odds ratios (OR) for logistic regression, along with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

2.6. Ethics

Written patient consent was obtained. This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. According to the guidelines of the responsible state medical association of North Rhine, ethical approval was not necessary for this retrospective anonymous analysis (reference number 70/2021).

3. Results

After applying the exclusion criteria, 856 patients remained (Table 1).
Patients with a BMI below 20 kg/m2 were more likely to be female and showed significantly decreased albumin and creatinine values than patients with a higher BMI. Hypoalbuminemia was associated with a higher ASA grade, lower BMI, and significantly lower prothrombin time, and patients showed a higher CCI. Significantly lower hemoglobin values were found in both groups. No differences were seen in age, type of fracture, anticoagulants, or ISAR score (Table 2).

3.1. Inpatient Outcomes

The inpatient outcome showed no differences in time to surgery or type of surgery in all groups. Hypoalbuminemia was associated with a significantly higher mortality rate and more perioperative complications, as measured with the Clavien–Dindo classification. Neither of the outcome parameters were conspicuous in the BMI analysis. The intraoperative blood loss was inconsistent between the albumin and BMI groups. It was significantly lower in the low-BMI group and in the high-albumin group. The blood transfusion rate was higher in the hypoalbuminemia group. Patients with low albumin values were more likely to receive a central venous line and an invasive blood pressure measurement (Table 3).

3.2. Multivariable Logistic and Linear Regression

After controlling for the ISAR grade, ASA grade, sex, age, and type of proximal femur fracture, the impact of BMI and albumin on the outcome parameters showed divergent results. Only a tendency toward higher mortality was seen in patients with hypoalbuminemia (Table 4). An influence of a BMI < 20 kg/m2 could not be seen on the outcome parameters (Table 5).

4. Discussion

The aim of this study was to examine the differences in outcome between well-nourished and malnourished elderly patients with hip fracture surgery in a specialized orthogeriatric center based on a combination of serum albumin values and BMI. We determined that the nutritional status is associated with the outcome. Patients with low albumin values showed a higher complication rate and mortality rate.
Several observational studies, including a meta-analysis, show that preoperative hypoalbuminemia can predict mortality and morbidity in patients with hip fracture surgery [2,19,20,21,22] and that a poor nutritional state even influences rehabilitation [3]. Our inhouse mortality rate in the hypoalbuminemia group was 10.3%, while it was 4.1% in those with normal values (p = 0.02). Comparative studies revealed similar mortality rates of 9.94% vs. 5.53% [19] and 11% vs. 4% [22]. However, it should be taken into account that many other factors, such as sex or age, have an influence on the mortality rate in geriatric hip fractures [23]. We conducted a regression analysis to determine the influence of hypoalbuminemia on the outcome. After controlling for the ISAR grade, ASA grade, sex, age, and type of proximal femur fracture, the effect of albumin on mortality was weaker but still measurable at the significance level of 0.1.
Additionally, it should be mentioned that patients with low serum albumin levels had lower preoperative hemoglobin levels and lower prothrombin time, which is most likely to be seen as an expression of a deficiency-induced synthesis disorder. Both pathologies are reflected in the intra- and postoperative blood loss and transfusion rates, which were significantly higher in the hypoalbuminemia group. As we did not find any differences in the intake of anticoagulants between both groups, the lower prothrombin time could be discussed as an expression of malnutrition as well, as mentioned above, as the parameters measured by the prothrombin time are a product of liver synthesis and are directly dependent on nutrition and vitamin K intake [24].
Data regarding the relationship of a high or low BMI with the outcome parameters after hip fracture surgery are comparatively rare. It has been shown that a BMI below 20 kg/m2 is associated with a higher mortality rate compared to normal weight [17,25]. A meta-analysis, including 11 studies, recently demonstrated an inverse relation of body weight with short-term and long-term mortality after hip fracture surgery [26]. Our data did not reveal any significant differences in the mortality rates related to the BMI, but there was a tendency towards a higher mortality rate in the underweight group (BMI < 20 kg/m2) group.
It must be mentioned that the BMI was calculated from the anesthesia form and is sensitive to errors as the body weight is difficult to measure before hip fracture surgery, and the declaration of weight and height was made by the patients themselves. Besides the different amounts of crystalloids intraoperatively, no significant difference between the two BMI groups was seen in our analysis, which could be due to the lower number of patients in the lower-BMI group. Our data hinted towards more intraoperative cardiac arrests and higher resuscitation rates in the undernourished BMI group, but this association should be assessed carefully due to the small sample size.
When comparing both identified groups, we found that patients with a low albumin value had a higher CCI and ASA grade, as well as a lower hemoglobin value and prothrombin time. Looking at the outcome parameters, hypoalbuminemia seems to be a more reliable parameter for predicting the likelihood of complications and mortality than a low BMI level. This correlates with previous findings in the literature, where BMI alone has not been recommended for screening malnutrition in geriatric trauma patients. Additional testing should be conducted, such as the MNA short form and the NRS 2002, which were validated in this group of patients and can be performed in a short period of time, even with cognitively impaired patients. For such patients, a helpful and easy-to-handle guideline has been published by the ESPEN society for nutrition in dementia. This guideline can help in making decisions perioperatively, especially in cases of problems with nutritional intake [27]. Lastly, not only malnutrition, but also osteosarcopenia must be kept in mind and detected in such patients as its influence is crucial for the improvement of postoperative outcomes.
However, our analysis demonstrated that there is an association between mortality and hypoalbuminemia following hip fracture surgery. But nourishment cannot be seen as a single parameter and is embedded in a complex of afflictions of old age that might raise the mortality rate in the elderly and is only one of many parameters in geriatric care that should be addressed. These results should encourage all those involved in elderly care to focus on diet and nutritional status. Further studies should focus on intervention in postoperative care to decrease the mortality rate for undernourished patients as there are hints that nutritional support decreases the mortality rate and surgical site infections after hip fracture surgery [28,29].

5. Conclusions

Hypoalbuminemia is associated with a higher risk of complications and mortality following hip fracture surgery and is a more reliable parameter to assess the outcome after hip fracture surgery than the BMI. However, albumin is not an independent factor and has to be seen in the context of comorbidities and other risk factors. Nevertheless, this study has some limitations. First of all, it was a retrospective study, and there are known potential biases associated with such as study, e.g., selection bias or confounding factors. Furthermore, this was a single-center study, and internal procedures may limit the universality of our results and conclusions. However, our data are mostly coherent with recent literature. Another limitation concerns the sample size. More reliable statements for rare events require a bigger study population.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.P. and C.S.; formal analysis, B.P., F.M., M.R., R.A., T.K., D.E., B.H., A.M., S.L. and C.S.; writing—original draft, B.P. and C.S.; writing—review and editing, F.M., M.R., R.A., T.K., D.E., B.H., A.M. and S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the state medical association of North Rhine. Ethical approval was not necessary for this retrospective anonymous analysis (reference number 70/2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schnell, S.; Friedman, S.M.; Mendelson, D.A.; Bingham, K.W.; Kates, S.L. The 1-year mortality of patients treated in a hip fracture program for elders. Geriatr. Orthop. Surg. Rehabil. 2010, 1, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Malafarina, V.; Reginster, J.-Y.; Cabrerizo, S.; Bruyère, O.; Kanis, J.A.; Martinez, J.A.; Zulet, M.A. Nutritional Status and Nutritional Treatment Are Related to Outcomes and Mortality in Older Adults with Hip Fracture. Nutrients 2018, 10, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wong, A.M.; Xu, B.Y.; Low, L.L.; Allen, J.C.; Low, S.G. Impact of malnutrition in surgically repaired hip fracture patients admitted for rehabilitation in a community hospital: A cohort prospective study. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2021, 44, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ihle, C.; Freude, T.; Bahrs, C.; Zehendner, E.; Braunsberger, J.; Biesalski, H.K.; Lambert, C.; Stöckle, U.; Wintermeyer, E.; Grünwald, J.; et al. Malnutrition—An underestimated factor in the inpatient treatment of traumatology and orthopedic patients: A prospective evaluation of 1055 patients. Injury 2017, 48, 628–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Choi, S.U.; Rho, J.H.; Choi, Y.J.; Jun, S.W.; Shin, Y.J.; Lee, Y.S.; Shin, H.J.; Lim, C.H.; Shin, H.W.; Kim, J.H.; et al. Postoperative hypoalbuminemia is an independent predictor of 1-year mortality after surgery for geriatric intertrochanteric femoral fracture: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine 2021, 100, e28306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, X.; Dai, L.; Zhang, Y.; Lv, Y. Gender and Low Albumin and Oxygen Levels are Risk Factors for Perioperative Pneumonia in Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients. Clin. Interv. Aging 2020, 15, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Eschbach, D.; Kirchbichler, T.; Oberkircher, L.; Knobe, M.; Juenemann, M.; Ruchholtz, S.; Buecking, B. Management of malnutrition in geriatric trauma patients: Results of a nationwide survey. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2016, 42, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Foo, M.X.E.; Wong, G.J.Y.; Lew, C.C.H. A systematic review of the malnutrition prevalence in hospitalized hip fracture patients and its associated outcomes. JPEN J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 2021, 45, 1141–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bohl, D.D.; Shen, M.R.; Kayupov, E.; Della Valle, C.J. Hypoalbuminemia Independently Predicts Surgical Site Infection, Pneumonia, Length of Stay, and Readmission After Total Joint Arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 2016, 31, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Murphy, M.C.; Brooks, C.N.; New, S.A.; Lumbers, M.L. The use of the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) tool in elderly orthopaedic patients. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 54, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Protopapas, A.D. Does Body Mass Index Affect Mortality in Coronary Surgery? Open Cardiovasc. Med. J. 2016, 10, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Porter Starr, K.N.; Bales, C.W. Excessive Body Weight in Older Adults: Concerns and Recommendations. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2015, 31, 311–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Winter, J.E.; MacInnis, R.J.; Wattanapenpaiboon, N.; Nowson, C.A. BMI and all-cause mortality in older adults: A meta-analysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 99, 875–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Horvath, B.; Kloesel, B.; Todd, M.M.; Cole, D.J.; Prielipp, R.C. The Evolution, Current Value, and Future of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System. Anesthesiology 2021, 135, 904–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. McCusker, J.; Bellavance, F.; Cardin, S.; Trépanier, S.; Verdon, J.; Ardman, O. Detection of older people at increased risk of adverse health outcomes after an emergency visit: The ISAR screening tool. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1999, 47, 1229–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dindo, D.; Demartines, N.; Clavien, P.-A. Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey. Ann. Surg. 2004, 240, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Akinleye, S.D.; Garofolo, G.; Culbertson, M.D.; Homel, P.; Erez, O. The Role of BMI in Hip Fracture Surgery. Geriatr. Orthop. Surg. Rehabil. 2018, 9, 2151458517747414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Russel, M.; McAdams, M.; Matarese, L.; Gottschlich, M. Laboratory monitoring of nutritional status. In Contemporary Nutrition Support Practice: A Clinical Guide; Matarese, L.E., Gottschlich, M.M., Eds.; W.B. Saunders Company: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1998; pp. 47–63. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bohl, D.D.; Shen, M.R.; Hannon, C.P.; Fillingham, Y.A.; Darrith, B.; Della Valle, C.J. Serum Albumin Predicts Survival and Postoperative Course Following Surgery for Geriatric Hip Fracture. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2017, 99, 2110–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ryan, S.; Politzer, C.; Fletcher, A.; Bolognesi, M.; Seyler, T. Preoperative Hypoalbuminemia Predicts Poor Short-term Outcomes for Hip Fracture Surgery. Orthopedics 2018, 41, e789–e796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cabrerizo, S.; Cuadras, D.; Gomez-Busto, F.; Artaza-Artabe, I.; Marín-Ciancas, F.; Malafarina, V. Serum albumin and health in older people: Review and meta analysis. Maturitas 2015, 81, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pimlott, B.J.; Jones, C.A.; Beaupre, L.A.; Johnston, D.W.C.; Majumdar, S.R. Prognostic impact of pre-operative albumin on short-term mortality and complications in patients with hip fracture. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2011, 53, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Schoeneberg, C.; Aigner, R.; Pass, B.; Volland, R.; Eschbach, D.; Peiris, S.E.; Ruchholtz, S.; Lendemans, S. Effect of time-to-surgery on in-house mortality during orthogeriatric treatment following hip fracture: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 16,236 patients of the AltersTraumaRegister DGU®. Injury 2021, 52, 554–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mladěnka, P.; Macáková, K.; Kujovská Krčmová, L.; Javorská, L.; Mrštná, K.; Carazo, A.; Protti, M.; Remião, F.; Nováková, L. Vitamin K—Sources, physiological role, kinetics, deficiency, detection, therapeutic use, and toxicity. Nutr. Rev. 2021, 80, 677–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tiihonen, R.; Helkamaa, T.; Nurmi-Lüthje, I.; Kaukonen, J.-P.; Kataja, M.; Lüthje, P. Patient-specific factors affecting survival following hip fractures-a 14-year follow-up study in Finland. Arch. Osteoporos. 2022, 17, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yang, T.-I.; Chen, Y.-H.; Chiang, M.-H.; Kuo, Y.-J.; Chen, Y.-P. Inverse relation of body weight with short-term and long-term mortality following hip fracture surgery: A meta-analysis. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2022, 17, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Volkert, D.; Chourdakis, M.; Faxen-Irving, G.; Frühwald, T.; Landi, F.; Suominen, M.H.; Vandewoude, M.; Wirth, R.; Schneider, S.M. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in dementia. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 34, 1052–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Duncan, D.G.; Beck, S.J.; Hood, K.; Johansen, A. Using dietetic assistants to improve the outcome of hip fracture: A randomised controlled trial of nutritional support in an acute trauma ward. Age Ageing 2006, 35, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. He, Y.; Xiao, J.; Shi, Z.; He, J.; Li, T. Supplementation of enteral nutritional powder decreases surgical site infection, prosthetic joint infection, and readmission after hip arthroplasty in geriatric femoral neck fracture with hypoalbuminemia. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2019, 14, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Baseline data. The number of patients with data is given separately for each parameter. SD, standard deviation; ASA grade, American Society of Anesthesiologists; ISAR, Identification of Seniors At Risk; IQR, interquartile range; BMI, body mass index; mg, milligram; g, gram; kg, kilogram; m, meter; dL, deciliter; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index.
Table 1. Baseline data. The number of patients with data is given separately for each parameter. SD, standard deviation; ASA grade, American Society of Anesthesiologists; ISAR, Identification of Seniors At Risk; IQR, interquartile range; BMI, body mass index; mg, milligram; g, gram; kg, kilogram; m, meter; dL, deciliter; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index.
Patientsn = 856
Age (years)
Mean (SD)85 (6.7)
Type of fracturen = 856
Fracture of the femoral neck447 (52%)
Pertrochanteric fracture409 (48%)
ASA graden = 856
Median (IQR)3 (3–3)
13 (0.3%)
2143 (16.7%)
3625 (73%)
485 (10%)
50 (0%)
BMI (kg/m2)n = 665
Median (IQR)23.4 (23.4–25.9)
<20117 (17.6%)
20–24.9323 (48.6%)
25–29.9174 (26.2%)
≥3051 (7.7%)
Hemoglobin (g/dL)n = 856
Median (IQR)12.3 (11.18–13.40)
<812 (1%)
8–1094 (11%)
>10750 (88%)
Creatinin (mg/dL)n = 856
Median (IQR)0.96 (0.76–1.22)
<1.2626 (73%)
1.2–2192 (22%)
>238 (4%)
Sexn = 856
Male247 (29%)
Female609 (71%)
Anticoagulationn = 856
Yes386 (45%)
No470 (87.2%)
ISAR-Scoren = 855
Median (IQR)1 (0–3)
0331 (39%)
1134 (16%)
2129 (15%)
3122 (14%)
488 (10%)
543 (5%)
68 (1%)
Albumin (g/L)n = 642
Median (IQR)39.8 (36.8–42.5)
>35538 (84%)
30–34.968 (11%)
22–29.934 (5%)
<222 (0%)
Prothrombin time (%)n = 856
Median (IQR)93.5 (78–108)
<30394 (46%)
30−80186 (22%)
>80276 (32%)
CCIn = 856
Median (IQR)2 (1–3)
0187 (22%)
1–2375 (44%)
3–4205 (24%
≥589 (10%)
Table 2. Comparison of the baseline data between the patients with BMI greater or lesser than 20 kg/m2 and albumin greater or lesser than 35 g/L. The number of patients with data is given separately for each parameter. HA, hemiarthroplasty; THA, total hip arthroplasty; ASA grade, American Society of Anesthesiologists; ISAR, Identification of Seniors At Risk; IQR, interquartile range; BMI, body mass index; mg, milligram; g, gram; kg, kilogram; m, meter; L, liter; dl, deciliter; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index. * significant differences.
Table 2. Comparison of the baseline data between the patients with BMI greater or lesser than 20 kg/m2 and albumin greater or lesser than 35 g/L. The number of patients with data is given separately for each parameter. HA, hemiarthroplasty; THA, total hip arthroplasty; ASA grade, American Society of Anesthesiologists; ISAR, Identification of Seniors At Risk; IQR, interquartile range; BMI, body mass index; mg, milligram; g, gram; kg, kilogram; m, meter; L, liter; dl, deciliter; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index. * significant differences.
BMI < 20 kg/m2BMI ≥ 20 kg/m2p-ValueAlbumin ≤ 35 g/LAlbumin > 35 g/Lp-Value
Patientsn = 117n = 548 n = 107n = 535
Age (years)
Mean (SD)85840.4185850.67
Sexn = 117n = 548 n = 107n = 535
Male20 (17.1%)170 (31%)<0.01 *31 (29%)151 (28.2%)0.97
Female97 (82.9%)378 (69%)76 (71%)384 (71.8%)
Type of fracturen = 117n = 548 n = 107n = 535
Femoral neck53 (45%)299 (54.7%)0.0949 (45.8%)288 (53.8%)0.16
Pertrochanteric64 (55%)249 (45.3%)58 (54.2%)247 (46.2%)
Type of surgery
Femoral neckn = 53n = 299 n = 49n = 288
Nail1 (1.9%)6 (2%) 0 (0%)6 (2.1%)
HA48 (90.6%)272 (91%)0.3245 (91.8%)264 (91.7%)0.26
THA1 (1.9%)12 (4%)4 (8.2%)16 (5.6%)
Others3 (5.7%)9 (3%) 0 (0%)2 (0.7%)
Pertrochantericn = 64n = 249 n = 58n = 247
Nail62 (96.9%)240 (96.4%) 56 (96.6%)240 (97.2%)
HA2 (3.1%)8 (3.2%)0.912 (3.4%)6 (2.4%)0.82
THA0 (0%)1 (0.4%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Others0 (0%)0 (0%) 0 (0%)1 (0.4%)
Anticoagulationn = 117n = 548 n = 107n = 535
Yes43 (37%)249 (45.3%)0.1142 (39.3%)233 (43.6%)0.48
No74 (63%)299 (54.7)65 (60.7%)302 (56.4%)
ASA graden = 117n = 548 n = 107n = 534
Median (IQR)3 (3–3)3 (3–3)0.993 (3–3)3 (3–3)<0.01 *
10 (0%)2 (0.4%) 0 (0%)1 (0.2%)
219 (16%)97 (17.7%) 10 (9.3%)92 (17.2%)
389 (76%)395 (72%)0.7574 (69.2%)395 (73.8)<0.01 *
49 (8%)54 (9.9%) 23 (21.5%)47 (8.8%)
50 (0%)0 (0%) 0 (0%)0 (0%)
ISAR-Scoren = 117n = 547 n = 105n = 534
Median (IQR)1 (0–2)1 (0–3)0.461 (0–3)1 (0–3)0.40
049 (41.9%)227 (41.5%) 40 (38.1%)214 (40.1%)
124 (20.5%)82 (15%) 14 (13.3%)80 (15%)
218 (15.4%)78 (14.3%) 17 (16.2%)88 (16.5%)
38 (6.8%)75 (13.7%)0.4017 (16.2%)63 (11.8%)0.83
412 (10.3%)49 (9%) 10 (9.5%)52 (9.7%)
55 (4.3%)32 (5.9%) 7 (6.7%)33 (6.2%)
61 (0.9%)4 (0.7%) 2 (1.9%)4 (0.7%)
Albumin (g/L)n = 103n = 486
Median (IQR)38.6 (33.8–42.1)40.1 (37.1–42.7)0.01 *
>3572 (61.5%)423 (87%)
30–34.915 (12.8%)45 (9.3%)<0.01 *
22–29.916 (13.7%)16 (3.3%)
<220 (0%)2 (0.4%)
BMI (kg/m2) n = 97n = 492
Median (IQR) 22.8 (19.5–23.4)23.5 (21.1–25.9)0.02 *
<20 31 (32%)72 (14.6%)
20–24.9 38 (39.2%)249 (50.6%)<0.01 *
25–29.9 21 (21.6%)134 (27.2%)
≥30 7 (7.2%)37 (7.5%)
Hemoglobin (g/dL)n = 117n = 548 n = 107n = 535
Median (IQR)11.7 (10.7–12.8)12.4 (11.3–13.5)<0.01 *11.2 (10.2–12.5)12.4 (11.5–13.5)<0.01 *
<81 (0.9%)7 (1.3%) 3 (2.8%)6 (1.1%)
8–1017 (14.5%)56 (10.2%)0.3824 (22.4%)48 (9%)<0.01 *
>1099 (84.6%)485 (88.5%) 80 (74.8%)481(89.9%)
Prothrombine time (%)n = 117n = 548 n = 107n = 535
Median (IQR)98 (80–107)93 (78–107)0.4486 (74–102)94 (80–109)<0.01 *
<3062 (53%)236 (43.1%) 35 (32.7%)257 (48.0%)
30−8022 (18.8%)131 (23.9%)0.1440 (37.4%)103 (19.3%)<0.01 *
>8033 (28.2%)181 (33%) 32 (29.9%)175 (32.7%)
Creatinin (mg/dL)n = 117n = 548 n = 107n = 535
Median (IQR)0.85 (0.72–1.09)0.97 (0.77–1.25)<0.01 *1 (0.72–1.37)0.95 (0.77–1.21)0.56
<1.296 (82.1%)392 (71.5%) 67 (62.6%)398 (74.4%)
1.2–218 (15.4%)130 (23.7%)0.0631 (29%)115 (21.5%)0.03 *
>23 (2.6%)26 (4.7%) 9 (8.4%)22 (4.1%)
CCIn = 117n = 548 n = 107n = 535
Median (IQR)2 (1–3)2 (1–3)0.722 (1–4)2 (1–3)0.02 *
026 (22.2%)121 (22.1%) 20 (18.7%)113 (21.1%)
1–258 (49.6%)241 (44%)0.4835 (32.7%)243 (45.4%)0.19
3–426 (22.2%)131 (23.9%)35 (32.7%)130 (24.3%)
>=57 (6%)55 (10%) 17 (15.9%)49 (9.2%)
Table 3. Comparison of the treatment data between the patients with a BMI greater or less than 20 kg/m2 and albumin greater or less than 35 g/L. The number of patients with data is given separately for each parameter. ASA grade, American Society of Anesthesiologists; ISAR, Identification of Seniors At Risk; IQR, interquartile range; BMI, body mass index; h, hour; HA, hemiarthroplasty; THA, total hip arthroplasty; BCIS, bone cement implantation syndrome; g, gram; kg, kilogram; m, meter; L, liter; dL, deciliter; ml, milliliter; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; RCC, red cell concentrate; IBP, invasive blood pressure measurement; CVC, central venous catheter; ICU, intensive care unit. * Significant differences.
Table 3. Comparison of the treatment data between the patients with a BMI greater or less than 20 kg/m2 and albumin greater or less than 35 g/L. The number of patients with data is given separately for each parameter. ASA grade, American Society of Anesthesiologists; ISAR, Identification of Seniors At Risk; IQR, interquartile range; BMI, body mass index; h, hour; HA, hemiarthroplasty; THA, total hip arthroplasty; BCIS, bone cement implantation syndrome; g, gram; kg, kilogram; m, meter; L, liter; dL, deciliter; ml, milliliter; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; RCC, red cell concentrate; IBP, invasive blood pressure measurement; CVC, central venous catheter; ICU, intensive care unit. * Significant differences.
BMI < 20 kg/m2BMI ≥ 20 kg/m2p-ValueAlbumin ≤ 35 g/LAlbumin > 35 g/Lp-Value
Time-to-surgery
Mean (h)17.214.80.9714.915.10.96
Type of surgeryn = 114n = 540 n = 107n = 525
Nail63 (55.3%)246 (45.6%)0.1056 (52.3%)249 (47.4%)0.32
HA50 (43.9%)280 (51.9%)0.1247 (44%)270 (51.4%)0.26
THA1 (0.9%)14 (2.6%)0.434 (3.7%)6 (1.14%)0.12
BCISn = 54n = 306 n = 51n = 293
Yes16 (29.6%)82 (26.8%)0.7918 (35.3%)80 (27.3%)0.32
No38 (70.4%)224 (73.2%)33 (64.7%)213 (72.7%)
Complicationsn = 117n = 546 n = 107n = 533
Dindo = 060 (51.3%)296 (54.2%)0.6445 (42.1%)284 (53.3%)0.04 *
Dindo ≥ 157 (48.7%)250 (45.8%)62 (57.9%)249 (46.7%)
Deceasedn = 117n = 546 n = 107n =533
Yes9 (7.7%)25 (4.6%)0.2511 (10.3%)22 (4.1%)0.02 *
No108 (92.3%)521 (95.4%)96 (89.7%)511 (95.9%)
Pneumonian = 117n = 545 n = 107n = 532
Yes9 (7.7%)33 (6%)0.657 (6.5%)33 (6.2%)1
No108 (92.3%)512 (94%)100 (93.5%)499 (93.8%)
Surgical side infectionn = 117n = 546 n = 107n = 533
Yes3 (2.6%)4 (0.7%)0.210 (0%)6 (1.1%)0.58
No114 (97.4%)542 (99.3%)107 (100%)527 (98.9%)
Urinary tract infectionn = 117n = 546 n = 107n = 533
Yes24 (20.5%)101 (18.5%)0.7123 (21.5%)106 (20%)0.81
No93 (79.5%)445 (81.5%)84 (78.5%)427 (80%)
Blood lossn = 116n = 546 n = 106n = 535
Median (IQR)100 (0–200)100 (0–300)0.04 *200 (0–300)100 (0–300)0.02 *
≤500114 (98.2%)513 (93.6%) 95 (89.6%)510 (95.3%)
501–10002 (1.7%)31 (5.7%)0.2610 (9.4%)22 (4.1%)0.06
1001–150002 (0.4%)1 (0.9%)1 (0.2%)
≥150102 (0.4%) 0 (0%)2 (0.4%)
Intraoperative crystalloids (mL)n = 116n = 548 n = 106n = 535
Median (IQR)1000 (500–1500)1000 (1000–1500)0.061000 (1000–1500)1000 (800–1500)0.19
≤50041 (35.3%)123 (22.4%) 24 (22.6%)133 (24.9%)
501–10041 (35.3%)254 (46.4%)0.03 *
41 (38.7%)235 (44%)0.49
1001–150022 (19%)117 (21.4%)27 (25.5%)115 (21.5%)
≥150112 (10.3%)54 (9.9%)14 (13.2%)52 (9.7%)
Intraoperative Colloids (mL)n = 116n = 548 n =106n = 535
Median (IQR)0 (0–500)0 (0–500)0.890 (0–500)0 (0–500)0.16
≤500115 (99.1%)530 (96.7%) 102 (96.2%)522 (97.6%)
501–10001 (0.9%)16 (2.9%)0.36
3 (2.8%)12 (2.2%)0.41
1001–15000 (0%)2 (0.4%)1 (0.9%)1 (0.2%)
≥15010 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Intraoperative Catecholaminen = 116n = 548 n = 106n =535
Yes99 (85.3%)476 (86.9%)0.7698 (92.5%)461 (86.2%)0.11
No17 (14.7%)72 (13.1%)8 (7.5%)74 (13.8%)
Intraoperative CPRn = 116n = 548 n = 106n = 535
Yes3 (2.6%)2 (0.4%)0.051 (0.9%)4 (0.7%)1
No113 (97.4%)546 (99.6%)105 (99.1%)531 (99.3%)
Transfusion (RCC)n = 117n = 546 n = 107n = 533
Median (IQR)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0.930 (0–1)0 (0–0)<0.01 *
091 (77.8%)428 (78.4%) 72 (67.3%)423 (79.4%)
19 (7.7%)27 (5%)0.419 (8.4%)27 (5.1%)0.05 *
213 (11.1%)56 (10.3%)16 (15%)57 (10.7%)
≥34 (3.4%)35 (6.4%) 10 (9.3%)26 (4.9%)
IBPn = 116n =548 n = 106n = 535
Yes45 (38.8%)229 (41.8%)0.6262 (58.5%)220 (41.1%)<0.01 *
No71 (61.2%)319 (58.2%)44 (41.5%)315 (58.9%)
CVCn = 116n =548 n = 106n = 535
Yes28 (24.1%)118 (21.5%)0.6243 (40.7%)103 (19.3%)<0.01 *
No88 (76%)430 (88.5%)63 (59.4%)432 (80.7%)
Postoperative ICUn = 116n = 548 n = 106n = 535
Yes12 (10.3%)42 (7.7%)0.4413 (12.3%)43 (8%)0.22
No104 (89.7%)506 (92.3%)93 (87.7%)492 (92%)
Table 4. Impact of Albumin on different outcome parameters. Results of the logistic and linear regression analysis. All regression models were adjusted for ASA grade, sex, age, CCI, type of fracture. OD, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ICU, intensive care unit.
Table 4. Impact of Albumin on different outcome parameters. Results of the logistic and linear regression analysis. All regression models were adjusted for ASA grade, sex, age, CCI, type of fracture. OD, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ICU, intensive care unit.
Impact of Albumin onnOR (95% CI)p-Value
In-hospital mortality6401.96 (0.88–4.36)0.10
Complications (Dindo ≥ 1)6401.33 (0.85–2.06)0.21
Intraoperative crystalloids6411.46 (0.93–2.30)0.10
Intraoperative colloids6411.45 (0.92–2.28)0.11
Postoperative ICU treatment6411.29 (0.63–2.62)0.98
Table 5. Impact of BMI on different outcome parameters. Results of the logistic and linear regression analysis. All regression models were adjusted for ASA grade, sex, age, CCI, type of fracture. OD, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ICU, intensive care unit.
Table 5. Impact of BMI on different outcome parameters. Results of the logistic and linear regression analysis. All regression models were adjusted for ASA grade, sex, age, CCI, type of fracture. OD, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ICU, intensive care unit.
Impact of BMI onnOR (95% CI)p-Value
In-hospital mortality6632.01 (0.86–4.68)0.11
Complications (Dindo ≥ 1)6631.12 (0.74–1.71)0.59
Intraoperative crystalloids6641.00 (0.64–1.58)0.98
Intraoperative colloids6641.15 (0.74–1.78)0.52
Postoperative ICU treatment6641.58 (0.76–3.29)0.21
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pass, B.; Malek, F.; Rommelmann, M.; Aigner, R.; Knauf, T.; Eschbach, D.; Hussmann, B.; Maslaris, A.; Lendemans, S.; Schoeneberg, C. The Influence of Malnutrition Measured by Hypalbuminemia and Body Mass Index on the Outcome of Geriatric Patients with a Fracture of the Proximal Femur. Medicina 2022, 58, 1610. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111610

AMA Style

Pass B, Malek F, Rommelmann M, Aigner R, Knauf T, Eschbach D, Hussmann B, Maslaris A, Lendemans S, Schoeneberg C. The Influence of Malnutrition Measured by Hypalbuminemia and Body Mass Index on the Outcome of Geriatric Patients with a Fracture of the Proximal Femur. Medicina. 2022; 58(11):1610. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111610

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pass, Bastian, Fahd Malek, Moritz Rommelmann, Rene Aigner, Tom Knauf, Daphne Eschbach, Bjoern Hussmann, Alexander Maslaris, Sven Lendemans, and Carsten Schoeneberg. 2022. "The Influence of Malnutrition Measured by Hypalbuminemia and Body Mass Index on the Outcome of Geriatric Patients with a Fracture of the Proximal Femur" Medicina 58, no. 11: 1610. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111610

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop