Next Article in Journal
Liposomes for Intra-Articular Analgesic Drug Delivery in Orthopedics: State-of-Art and Future Perspectives. Insights from a Systematic Mini-Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Journal
In Vivo Biological Evaluation of Orthodontically Moved Incisors after Replantation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pulmonologists Adherence to the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease GOLD Guidelines: A Goal to Improve

by
Ruxandra-Mioara Rajnoveanu
1,
Armand-Gabriel Rajnoveanu
2,*,
Andreea-Bianca Ardelean
3,
Doina Adina Todea
1,
Carmen-Monica Pop
1,
Sabina Antonela Antoniu
4,
Nicoleta Stefania Motoc
1,
Ana Florica Chis
1,
Ariadna Petronela Fildan
5 and
Milena Adina Man
1
1
Pneumology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 6 BP Hasdeu St, 400371 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Occupational Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 3-5 Clinicilor St, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Victor Babes St, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4
Nursing/Palliative Care, 2nd Department of Medicine, Gr T Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 16 Universitatii St, 700337 Iasi, Romania
5
Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ovidius University, 124 Mamaia Bld, 900527 Constanta, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2020, 56(9), 422; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090422
Submission received: 6 July 2020 / Revised: 5 August 2020 / Accepted: 19 August 2020 / Published: 20 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Pulmonary)

Abstract

:
Background and objectives: Data about pulmonologist adherence to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines showed a great variability and cannot be extrapolated. The present study investigates the current pharmacological prescribing practices in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) according to the 2017 GOLD guidelines, to determine the level of pulmonologist adherence and to identify possible factors that influence physician adherence. Materials and methods: This retrospective study took place between 1 February and 30 April 2018 in Pneumophtysiology Clinical Hospital Cluj-Napoca. We included 348 stable COPD outpatients classified according to the 2017 GOLD strategy in the ABCD risk groups. Pulmonologist adherence was defined as appropriate if the recommended pharmacological therapy was the first- or alternative-choice drug according to the guidelines, and inappropriate (overtreatment, undertreatment) if it was not in line with these recommendations. Results: The most prescribed treatment was the combination long-acting beta agonist (LABA) + long-acting antimuscarinic agent (LAMA) (34.77%), followed by LAMA + LABA + inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). Overall, pneumologist adherence was 79.02%. The most inappropriate therapies were in Group B (33.57%), followed by 33.33% in Group A. Compared to Groups C and D (analyzed together), Groups A and B had a 4.65 times higher chance (p = 0.0000001) of receiving an inappropriate therapy. Patients with cardiovascular comorbidities had a 1.89 times higher risk of receiving an inappropriate therapy (p = 0.021). ICS overprescription was the most common type of inappropriateness (17.81%). Groups C and D had a 3.12 times higher chance of being prescribed ICS compared to Groups A and B (p = 0.0000004). Conclusions: Pulmonologist adherence to the GOLD guidelines is not optimal and needs to be improved. Among the factors that influence the inappropriateness of COPD treatments, cardiovascular comorbidities and low-risk Groups A and B are important. ICS represent the most prescribed overtreatment. Further multicentric studies are needed to evaluate all factors that might influence the adherence rate.

1. Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains one of the leading global causes of mortality and morbidity [1], estimated to be the third most common cause of death by 2020 [2]. The 2011 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines were designed to provide healthcare professionals with the most appropriate recommendations for the diagnosis and management of COPD patients. Since then, this guide, and its major (2006, 2011, and 2017), and minor revisions (almost yearly) [3], have become the most important tool accessed in global clinical practices [4]. Of these, the 2017 revision had particular importance because it refined the previous ABCD assessment considering patient symptoms [5,6], combined with the history of exacerbations, excluding spirometry grading and modifying the pharmacological recommendations [1]. Although the COPD guidelines are important for the management of the disease [4], in a number of countries, low levels of adherence to the guideline recommendations were recorded among doctors treating different patient cohorts [4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14], often with overtreatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) [13]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) [15], factors influencing pulmonologist adherence to the guidelines are very complex, related not only to the physician, but also to the patient, disease, and/or social aspects [14,16]. Regardless of barriers, the suboptimal level of adherence has a negative impact on clinical benefits [15], the risk of acute COPD exacerbations [17,18], and treatment success [14]. On the other hand, by improving adherence, the effects are not only clinical and functional [13,19,20], but also come with economic benefits that decrease direct and indirect healthcare costs [21,22].
Most studies that have investigated physician adherence to the GOLD guidelines were conducted at different levels—regional, national [4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,23], or even local and, single-centered [14]. The results showed a great variability [22,24], and because of this, they cannot be globally extrapolated. They took place among pulmonologists, but also among other specialties involved in COPD treatments [25], evaluating different GOLD reports [13] mainly in 2009–2018, with a higher interest in the 2017 GOLD strategy [4,11,14,23,26]. Hsieh et al. emphasized the importance of better implementing guidelines in clinical practice by optimizing their dissemination [11]. Better communication is also needed between doctors and the organizations responsible for issuing guidelines to identify adherence barriers and to adapt the recommendations to the requirements of daily medical practices [8]. In light of these observations, it was salutary to evaluate the pulmonologist knowledge and application of COPD management guidelines in Romania, where the overall prevalence of this condition was estimated at 8.13% in the adult population [27]. The present study aimed to: (1) investigate the current pharmacological prescribing practices in COPD treatment according to the 2017 GOLD guidelines, (2) determine the level of pulmonologist adherence, and (3) identify possible factors that influence the adherence to therapeutic recommendations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Selection

This retrospective, observational study took place between 1 February and 30 April 2018 in Pneumophtysiology Clinical Hospital Cluj-Napoca. Outpatient electronic medical records were collected. The inclusion criteria were: patients with a documented diagnosis of COPD confirmed by a pulmonologist on the basis of clinical history, a physical examination, and spirometric evaluation; stable forms; aged ≥ 40 years; classified according to 2017 GOLD guidelines in the ABCD risk groups (by symptoms and exacerbation history). The exclusion criteria were: inpatients, younger than 40 years old, an unconfirmed COPD diagnosis, incomplete medical records (lack of GOLD stage/group), and patients presenting acute COPD exacerbations or a concomitant asthma diagnosis. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Pneumophtysiology Clinical Hospital Cluj-Napoca (approval number 1689/2018, approval date: 26 January 2018).

2.2. Data Collection

A reference number was assigned to each patient corresponding to the order in which they were included in the study. The following data were collected: age, race, gender, location of residency (urban or rural), cigarette-smoking history, spirometry classification of airflow-limitation severity GOLD Grades 1–4, GOLD ABCD risk groups, comorbidities (cardiovascular diseases), the presence of a chronic respiratory failure diagnosis in the patient medical records, first consultation or regular follow-up visit, inhaled pharmacological medications prescribed for COPD as a monotherapy or in different combinations of short-acting beta agonists (SABA), long-acting beta agonists (LABA), short-acting antimuscarinic agents (SAMA), long-acting antimuscarinic agents (LAMA), and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Comorbid cardiovascular disease consists of arterial hypertension, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, cor pulmonale, arrhythmias, and valvopathies, as they were mentioned in the patients’ medical records.

2.3. Adherence to the GOLD Guidelines

Adherence was defined as appropriate if the recommended pharmacological therapy was the first-choice or alternative-choice drug according to the guidelines, and inappropriate if it was not in line with these recommendations [1]. Furthermore, an inappropriate therapy was classified as overtreatment or undertreatment.
An appropriate therapy was assessed according to specific 2017 GOLD algorithms for the treatment of each risk group (Table 1).
The phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor was not included in our therapy algorithm, as it was not available in Romania.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The data were collected in 2016 Microsoft Excel software (version 18.2006.1031.0, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, DC, USA), and transferred to SPSS software (IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0.0.0, Armonk, New York, NY, USA) for the statistical analysis. The quantitative variables were expressed by their median/mean ± standard deviation (SD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI). The qualitative variables were expressed as absolute and relative numbers (percentages). The used statistical tests were the chi-squared test for frequency comparison, the t-test for independent samples to compare the averages of two samples comprising normally distributed variables, and the Mann–Whitney U test to compare the means of two samples comprising abnormally distributed variables. The level for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

The study included 348 patients consulted by 15 pulmonologists; 325 patients were excluded due to a lack of a COPD stage/group being documented in their record. The baseline characteristics of the COPD patients are presented in Table 2. The mean age of the cohort was 68.61 years with a standard deviation of 10.61 years. The male gender was predominant (72.41%) with a 2.6:1 ratio compared to females. All patients were white (100%); 191 (54.89%) patients lived in urban areas, and 157 (45.11%) in rural settings. Among the 348 patients, smoking-history data were available for 235 (67.53%) patients—23.83% were current smokers, 63.40% were former smokers, and 12.77% patients had never smoked. In 113 cases, no information about smoking history was available. The data about smoking pack-years were recorded in only 117 patients, with calculated mean pack-years of 40 ± 14.86. According to the GOLD spirometry grades, 37.83% of patients were classified as GOLD 2, followed by GOLD 3 (26.72%), GOLD 4 (26.15%), and GOLD 1 (9.20%). When classified into the refined 2017 GOLD ABCD groups, most patients were in Group B (41.09%) and Group D (28.45%), followed by Group C (24.34%) and Group A (6.03%). Most current smokers were in Group A (28.57%) and Group B (17.48%); 41.24% of COPD patients presented cardiovascular comorbidities, and 115 (33.04%) cases had chronic respiratory failure.
The percentages of the different therapeutic regimens were different across the GOLD ABCD groups, as listed in Table 3. Overall, the most prescribed maintenance treatment was the combination of LAMA + LABA (34.77%), followed by triple therapy LAMA + LABA + ICS (in two different inhalers) (24.14%), LAMA (18.97%), and LABA + ICS (17.82%). The percentages may not sum up to 100 because of rounding.
From the 348 patients included in the study, 275 patients received the appropriate therapy; therefore, the overall pneumologist adherence to the 2017 GOLD recommendations was 79.02%. The appropriateness and inappropriateness of pharmacological treatments were different for each of the ABCD groups (Figure 1).
The most inappropriate therapy was in Group B patients (33.57%), with overtreatment in 31.46% of cases (0.7% ICS, 20.98% ICS + LABA and 9.79% LAMA + LABA + ICS), and undertreatment in 2.1% of patients. Of Group A patients, 33.33% had inappropriate (overtreatment) prescriptions, with LAMA + LABA (28.57%) and LABA + ICS (4.75%). Of Group C patients, 18.82% were overtreated with triple therapy. Undertreatment was seen in 2.02% of Group D patients. Overall, ICS overprescription was the most common type of inappropriate treatment (17.81%), occurring mostly in Group B patients (31.46%), followed by Group C (18.82%) and Group A patients (4.75%). We applied the chi-squared test to analyze the frequency of ICS prescriptions between the high-risk exacerbation groups (C and D) (analyzed together) in which their prescription was recommended by the GOLD 2017 guidelines compared to the low-risk exacerbation groups (A and B) (analyzed together). The results were statistically significant (p = 0.0000004), with patients in Groups C and D having a 3.12 times higher chance of being prescribed ICS compared to Group A and B (odds ratio (OR) 3.12 with a 95% CI, 1.9951–4.8840).
Using statistical tests (a t-test for independent samples, and chi-squared test), we analyzed the variables of 275 patients treated according to the guidelines compared to those with inappropriate prescriptions (Table 4). Group A and B patients (analyzed together) had a significantly statistically higher chance (p = 0.0000001) to receive an inappropriate therapy compared to Group C and D patients (analyzed together) with an OR of 4.65 (95% CI, 2.5937–8.3488). The frequency of treatment concordance recorded statistically significant differences between patients with and without cardiovascular comorbidities (p = 0.021), with an OR of 1.89 (95% CI, 1.0946–3.27350).
Analysis of the first-choice compared to alternative-choice prescription drug showed statistically significant differences for three variables, as listed in Table 5. Males had a 1.83 times higher chance to receive alternative and not first-choice drugs compared to females (p = 0.029), with an OR of 1.83 (95% CI of 1.0568–3.1817). COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure also had a 2.96 times higher chance to receive alternative and not first-choice therapy compared to those without this condition, with an OR of 2.96 (95% CI of 1.6988–5.1455) (p = 0.00009). Patients at first consultation had a 2.77 greater chance to receive first-choice therapy and not the alternative variant compared to patients at follow-up visits (p = 0.002), with an OR of 2.77 (95% CI of 1.4096–5.4387).

4. Discussion

The core findings of our research were the relatively good adherence of pulmonologists to the 2017 GOLD guidelines (79.02%), and the association between inappropriate treatment prescriptions and comorbid cardiovascular disease (1.89 higher risk) on the one hand, and the low-risk exacerbation groups (A and B) (4.65 higher risk) on the other hand. ICS-containing regimens were the most prescribed overtreatment overall (17.81%).
Our cohort of 348 patients had similar demographic and clinical characteristics to those in other studies. The number of our COPD patients was close to that of a North African cohort (296 patients), analyzed by Aissa et al. [14], and more than double the number of patients included in the study of Chinai et al. [26]. The predominance of the male gender (72.4%) was observed in most studies [4,11,13,14,23], while the mean age was similar to the Korean KOCOSS study [4] and the Tunisian study of Aissa [14]. Regarding smoking status, our results were close to those of the Italian study of Palmiotti et al. [13], but the percentage of current smokers (23.83%) was underestimated due to missing data about smoking in about one third (32.37%) of cases. This lack of evidence drew attention to a major deficiency in treating tobacco use and dependence in Romania, where only about 44% of doctors offer smoking-cessation counselling [27,28].
The adherence of pneumologists to the GOLD guidelines represented the primary endpoint of our analysis. According to the definition provided by the United States National Library of Medicine, adherence to medical practice guidelines means “conformity in fulfilling or following official, recognized guidelines, recommendations, protocols” with their application in clinical practice [29]. Though the concept looks clear, it is overly complex [30]. Similar to other studies [4,7,10,11,13,14,23,26], the metric that we used in our study to assess doctor adherence to guidelines was the percentage of pharmacological prescriptions that were in accordance with the recommendations of the GOLD guidelines. In the analysis we did not include factors influencing pulmonologist adherence, a limitation of the study that was also reported by Aissa and colleagues in their research [14]. Overall, pulmonologist adherence to pharmacological therapy, according to the 2017 GOLD guidelines, was 79.02%. This is close to the 70% rate reported by Palmiotti et al. [13], and higher compared to most previously published results, where the adherence level varied between 29.7% in Tunisia and the Maghreb [14], 44.9% in Taiwan [11], 49.6% in South Korea [4], 58.25% in Western Europe and the USA [12], and 61.6% in Turkey [10]. Though there is no standard cut-off for satisfactory adherence [22], our value is improvable. We may assume that the rate of adherence in our study could have a similar explanation to that offered by Palmiotti and colleagues in their study [13]. The study was conducted in a university center where the influx of updated medical information is continuous, with more trainee doctors and important economic resources [13].
The pulmonologist adherence rate was different across the ABCD groups. The highest concordance between the prescribed medication and GOLD 2017 guidelines was seen in high-risk exacerbation patients from Groups D and C (81.18%), followed by prescriptions given to low-risk exacerbation patients from Groups A (66.67%) and B (66.43%). This variation was consistent with that observed in other studies [4,10,12,23], and emphasizes that COPD patients from specific GOLD Groups and in different countries are not appropriately treated by their doctors [14], even with regard to the same therapeutic approach recommended by the GOLD guidelines. Moreover, Group A and B patients (analyzed together) had a 4.65-fold higher chance of receiving inappropriate therapy compared to those from Groups C and D (p = 0.0000001). This finding should encourage pulmonologists to more carefully prescribe treatment, not only in high- but also in low-risk groups, knowing that Group B represents the most frequent (41.09%) category of patients [4,11,23]. In contrast to this, most Group D patients received appropriate therapy (97.98%) in line with the GOLD guidelines, a result similar to most related studies [10,13,22,31,32]. No GOLD Group D patient was overtreated, as in the TOLD study [11]. The reasons for all these findings may be the fact that this category of patients, with a high-symptom burden and high-risk of exacerbation, usually receives the maximal therapy (LAMA + LABA + ICS) if further exacerbations occur [1,33], and overtreatment is not possible.
Another significant factor that influenced the appropriateness of the therapy prescription according to the guidelines was the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities. COPD patients frequently present concomitant diseases like cardiovascular diseases [34], lung cancer [35], obstructive sleep apnea [36,37], and depression [38] that may influence the health status, prognosis, and whole course of the disease [1]. In our study, cardiovascular diseases were present in almost half of the COPD patients (42.24%). This comorbidity was a significant factor that influenced pulmonologist adherence to the GOLD guidelines. COPD patients with cardiovascular comorbidities were 1.89 times more likely to be prescribed pharmacological treatments that were inappropriate with the guidelines compared to those without this comorbidity (p = 0.02). The predominance of cardiovascular comorbidities was previously observed by Sharif et al. [7], without identifying a statistically significant association between their existence and adherence level. Our findings raise pulmonologists’ awareness to not only identify comorbidities, but to also be more careful when prescribing COPD treatments to patients with concomitant cardiovascular diseases, knowing that treatments for one condition may affect the other; therefore, the appropriate therapy of both conditions is important [34]. Inappropriate treatments in COPD patients with cardiovascular diseases consisted of under- and overtreatments. Undertreatments may be because of historical concern regarding an increased risk of cardiovascular events associated with LAMA and LABA use, particularly at treatment initiation, although the safety profile of this medication administered for a long time seems to be encouraging [34]. In overtreated patients, there may be some concerns regarding the safety of bronchodilators. However, there is conflicting evidence related to the cardiovascular events associated to bronchodilator administration in COPD. Some articles [39,40] suggested an increased risk, while others showed no evidence or even risk reduction [41,42]. Regarding the effect of triple therapy (ICS + LAMA + LABA), the TRIBUTE [43] and FULFIL [44] trials did not confirm excessive cardiovascular risk when compared to LAMA + LABA or ICS + LABA.
Overall, the most common pharmacological treatment prescribed in our study was the combination of LAMA + LABA (34.77%), similar to the observations of Kim et al. [4]. The motifs are well-documented in the literature, with benefits not only on symptoms, health status, and lung function [1,45], but also on the exacerbation risk when compared to LAMA or LABA + ICS [1,46,47]. Triple therapy (24.14%; ICS + LABA + LAMA) was the second most prescribed regimen in our study. Except for Group D, where it represents an alternative of treatment for some patients [1], it was an inappropriate prescription for Groups B (9.79%) and C (18.82%). These findings were also noted in previous studies [11,12], with the highest frequency (33.94%) recorded by Ding et al. in a multinational study conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the USA [12]. On a different note, undertreatment (including no therapy) was observed in only 1.44% of our cases, in contrast with the results of Sharif [7] and Aissa [14], where this type of inappropriateness was predominant, and possibly explained by the low rate of COPD diagnosis, especially in the early stages of the disease.
In our study, ICS-containing regimens were prescribed in almost half of the patients (42.24%). Among these prescriptions, overtreatment with ICS (monotherapy or with other drugs, including triple therapy) was seen in 62 (17.81%) patients, which represented the most common type of inappropriateness. The result was not surprising, as it was underlined in most related studies [9,13,48,49,50,51]. The increased prescription frequency of ICS in Groups C and D was expected, but the fact that even patients without history of exacerbations, such as those in Groups A (4.76%) and B (31.46%), received ICS was not in line with the GOLD recommendations. This pattern is not uncommon in real-world practice, as was highlighted in the TOLD study [11,52], the KOCOSS study [4], and in the Portuguese study of Duarte-de-Araujo [23]. The widespread use of ICS in our study could be based on similar explanations in several other papers [13,14,27]: the lack of pulmonologist awareness of the updated GOLD guidelines [53], the long marketing history and information received from pharmaceutical companies [54], the automatic renewal of a prior prescription without an updated assessment [13] or without ICS withdrawal after they were introduced [11,55], pulmonologist preferences [13], the availability of drugs on the market [11], or the belief that ICS is the most beneficial in real life compared to clinical trials [14] and that it should be prescribed regardless of GOLD groups [8,14,56]. Moreover, a look at the local context may indicate other possible reasons why people with a lower GOLD grade are consistently overtreated. A single LABA medication registered on the local market and discontinued availability in drug stores for LABA and LABA + LAMA led to more frequent prescriptions of the ICS + LABA combination. For many years, Romanian pulmonologists treated COPD patients using ICS/LABA medication, and did not update their knowledge on the newer guidelines, which may result in overtreatment with this combination. Without neglecting the well-documented benefits of combining ICS with inhaled bronchodilators on symptoms, the risk of exacerbations and quality of life [4,57], pulmonologists should also weigh the possible side effects like the increased risk of pneumonia or diabetes/poor control of diabetes, oral candidiasis, or mycobacterial infections, including tuberculosis [57], and make the best recommendation to each COPD patient.
Patients at the first consultation had a significantly higher chance to receive first- compared to alternative-choice drugs (p = 0.002), a result that seems logical. According to the 2017 GOLD treatment algorithm, both first- and alternative-choice medications are considered appropriate therapies [1]. The male gender and chronic respiratory failure were associated with a higher chance to receive alternative- compared to first-choice drugs. These findings are difficult to interpret because of scarce data in the literature related to these results and the need for further research. Our study, to the best of our knowledge, is the first in Romania to address the problem of pulmonologist adherence to the GOLD 2017 guidelines, which is a strength, along with the inclusion of patients with cardiovascular disease who are systematically excluded in controlled trials.
Naturally, our study has some limitations. First, this retrospective study was conducted in one center, therefore the results may not be extrapolated. Second, the design of the study, with the inclusion of complete ABCD-categorized patients, may not reflect real life, as COPD patients are still underdiagnosed or have not been classified according to GOLD risk groups. The large number of ineligible patients due to the lack of a COPD stage/group documented in their records may lead to an overestimation of pulmonologist adherence. Another limitation is represented by the lack of patient follow-up, therefore, there is no information about the long-term management of stable COPD is available. Furthermore, the present research does not provide data on the adherence to nonpharmacological treatments or to other pharmacological therapies. Moreover, the study did not assess some important practical issues, like the availability and cost of medications, as the Romanian health-insurance system covers mostly half of the expenses. This can often be a decisive factor in prescribing medication, and may explain pulmonologist deviations from the guideline recommendations.
Lastly, reflecting on our findings, we make some recommendations that may be beneficial for clinical practice in Romania like the need for a more appropriate use of COPD guidelines, starting with a correct and complete diagnosis that leads to an appropriate therapy. Second, particular attention has to be paid by all clinicians to patients in low-risk Groups A and B and to those with concomitant cardiovascular disease.

5. Conclusions

Our study outlined that the pulmonologist adherence to the GOLD guidelines is not optimal and needs to be improved. Among factors that influence the inappropriateness of COPD treatment, the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities, and the low-risk groups (A and B) are particularly important. ICS-containing regimens represent the most common overtreatment, even in patients at a low risk of exacerbation. Further multicentric studies are needed to evaluate all factors that might influence adherence rates to reduce the gap between the guideline recommendations and real-life practice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.-M.R., A.-G.R., A.-B.A. and M.A.M.; methodology, A.-B.A., D.A.T., C.-M.P. and S.A.A.; software, A.-G.R.; validation, N.S.M., A.F.C. and A.P.F.; formal analysis, R.-M.R., A.-G.R., A.-B.A. and M.A.M.; investigation, D.A.T., C.-M.P. and S.A.A.; resources, R.-M.R. and A.-B.A.; data curation, R.-M.R. and A.-G.R.; writing—original draft preparation, R.-M.R., A.-G.R., N.S.M., A.F.C. and A.-B.A.; writing—review and editing, R.-M.R., A.-G.R., A.-B.A., D.A.T., C.-M.P., S.A.A., A.P.F. and M.A.M.; visualization, N.S.M., A.F.C. and A.P.F.; supervision, R.-M.R. and A.-G.R.; project administration, R.-M.R. and A.-G.R.; funding acquisition, none. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vogelmeier, C.F.; Criner, G.J.; Martinez, F.J.; Anzueto, A.; Barnes, P.J.; Bourbeau, J.; Celli, B.R.; Chen, R.; Decramer, M.; Fabbri, L.M.; et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease 2017 report. GOLD executive summary. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 195, 557–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mathers, C.D.; Loncar, D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006, 3, 2011–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Albitar, H.A.H.; Iyer, V.N. Adherence to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines in the real world: Current understanding, barriers, and solutions. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2020, 26, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kim, T.-O.; Shin, H.-J.; Kim, Y.-I.; Rhee, C.-K.; Lee, W.-Y.; Lim, S.-Y.; Ra, S.-W.; Jung, K.-S.; Yoo, K.-H.; Park, S.-J.; et al. Adherence to the GOLD guideline in COPD management of South Korea: Findings from KOCOSS Study 2011–2018. Chonnam Med. J. 2019, 55, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ardelean, D.L.; Lunceanu, I.; Popescu, R.; Didilescu, C.; Dinescu, S.; Olteanu, M.; Niţu, M. Evaluation of COPD patients using CAT-COPD assessment test. Pneumologia 2012, 61, 221–229. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cojocaru, C.; Marian, M.I.; Cojocaru, E. La perception de la fatigue chez les patients avec broncho-pneumonie chronique obstructive. Rev. Mal. Respir. 2012, 29, A58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sharif, R.; Cuevas, C.R.; Wang, Y.; Arora, M.; Sharma, G. Guideline adherence in management of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir. Med. 2013, 107, 1046–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Corrado, A.; Rossi, A. How far is real life from COPD therapy guidelines? An Italian observational study. Respir. Med. 2012, 106, 989–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sen, E.; Guclu, S.Z.; Kibar, I.; Ocal, U.; Yilmaz, V.; Celik, O.; Cimen, F.; Topcu, F.; Orhun, M.; Tereci, H.; et al. Adherence to GOLD guideline treatment recommendations among pulmonologists in Turkey. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2015, 10, 2657–2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Turan, O.; Emre, J.C.; Deniz, S.; Baysak, A.; Turan, P.A.; Mirici, A. Adherence to current COPD guidelines in Turkey. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2016, 17, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hsieh, M.-J.; Huang, S.-Y.; Yang, T.-M.; Tao, C.-W.; Cheng, S.-L.; Lee, C.-H.; Kuo, P.-H.; Wu, Y.-K.; Chen, N.-H.; Hsu, W.-H.; et al. The impact of 2011 and 2017 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (GOLD) guidelines on allocation and pharmacological management of patients with COPD in Taiwan: Taiwan Obstructive Lung Disease (TOLD) study. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2018, 13, 2949–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Ding, B.; Small, M.; Holmgren, U. A cross-sectional survey of current treatment and symptom burden of patients with COPD consulting for routine care according to GOLD 2014 classifications. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2017, 12, 1527–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Palmiotti, G.A.; Lacedonia, D.; Liotino, V.; Schino, P.; Satriano, F.; Di Napoli, P.L.; Sabato, E.; Mastrosimone, V.; Scoditti, A.; Carone, M.; et al. Adherence to GOLD guidelines in real-life COPD management in the Puglia region of Italy. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2018, 13, 2455–2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Aissa, S.; Knaz, A.; Maatoug, J.; Khedher, A.; Benzarti, W.; Abdelghani, A.; Garrouche, A.; Hayouni, A.; Benzarti, M.; Gargouri, I.; et al. Adherence of North-African Pulmonologists to the 2017-Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Pharmacological Treatment Guidelines (PTGs) of Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Burkhart, P.V.; Sabaté, E. Adherence to long-term therapies: Evidence for action. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2003, 35, 207. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ulmeanu, R.; Mihaltan, F.; Arghir, O.; Fira-Mladinescu, O.; Teodorescu, G. Treatment Goals in COPD: The Concordance Between Patients and Physicians (Interim Results of ACORD Study). Chest 2016, 150, 873A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hogea, S.-P.; Tudorache, E.; Fildan, A.P.; Fira-Mladinescu, O.; Marc, M.; Oancea, C. Risk factors of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. Clin. Respir. J. 2020, 14, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sandu, V.M.; Mihaescu, T.; Filipeanu, D.; Cernomaz, A.; Crisan-Dabija, R.A. Impact of halotherapy on COPD exacerbations. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 54, PA2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Asche, C.V.; Leader, S.; Plauschinat, C.; Raparla, S.; Yan, M.; Ye, X.; Young, D. Adherence to current guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among patients treated with combination of long-acting bronchodilators or inhaled cortico-steroids. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2012, 7, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Chiang, C.-H.; Liu, S.-L.; Chuang, C.-H.; Jheng, Y.-H. Effects of guideline-oriented pharmacotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed COPD: A prospective study. Wien Klin. Wochenschr. 2013, 125, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Miravitlles, M.; Sicras, A.; Crespo, C.; Cuesta, M.; Brosa, M.; Galera, J.; Lahoz, R.; Lleonart, M.; Riera, M.I. Costs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in relation to compliance with guidelines: A study in the primary care setting. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 2013, 7, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chan, K.P.; Ko, F.W.S.; Chan, H.S.; Wong, M.L.; Mok, T.Y.W.; Choo, K.L.; Hui, D.S.C. Adherence to a COPD treatment guideline among patients in Hong Kong. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2017, 12, 3371–3379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Duarte-de-Araújo, A.; Teixeira, P.; Hespanhol, V.; Correia-de-Sousa, J. COPD: Analysing factors associated with a successful treatment. Pulmonology 2020, 26, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sehl, J.; O’Doherty, J.; O’Connor, R.; O’Sullivan, B.; O’Regan, A. Adherence to COPD management guidelines in general practice? A review of the literature. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2018, 187, 403–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Surani, S.; Aiyer, A.; Eikermann, S.; Murphy, T.; Anand, P.; Varon, J.; Vanderheiden, D.; Khan, A.; Guzman, A. Adoption and adherence to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease GOLD guidelines in a primary care setting. SAGE Open Med. 2019, 7, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chinai, B.; Hunter, K.; Roy, S. Outpatient Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Physician Adherence to the 2017 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Guidelines and its Effect on Patient Outcomes. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2019, 11, 556–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ulmeanu, R.; Oancea, C.; Fildan, A.; Mihaltan, F. (Eds.) Recomandari de Diagnostic si Tratament in Bronhopneumopatia Obstructivă Cronica; Editura Medicală: Bucuresti, Romania, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  28. Davidescu, L.; Jurca, R.; Ulmeanu, R. Value of adding behavioural-cognitive therapy to standard treatment in smoking cessation programme: Results of Smoking Cessation Centre Oradea on 7 years. Eur. Respir. J. 2014, 44, P4161. [Google Scholar]
  29. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Available online: https://www.definitions.net/definition/guideline+adherence (accessed on 9 May 2020).
  30. López-Campos, J.L.; Gallego, E.Q.; Hernández, L.C. Status of and strategies for improving adherence to COPD treatment. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2019, 14, 1503–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ghosh, S.; Anderson, W.H.; Putcha, N.; Han, N.K.; Curtis, J.L.; Criner, G.J.; Dransfield, M.T.; Barr, R.G.; Krishnan, J.A.; Lazarus, S.C.; et al. Alignment of COPD medication use patterns with GOLD guidelines: Analysis of the SPIROMICS cohort. In B102. Clinical Trials and Studies in COPD; American Thoracic Society: New York, NY, USA, 2018; p. A4246. [Google Scholar]
  32. White, P.; Thornton, H.; Pinnock, H.; Georgopoulou, S.; Booth, H.P. Overtreatment of COPD with inhaled corticosteroids-implications for safety and costs: Cross-sectional observational study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ray, R.; Hahn, B.; Stanford, R.H.; White, J.; Essoi, B.; Hunter, A.G. Classification of Patients with COPD on LAMA Monotherapy Using the GOLD Criteria: Analysis of a Claims-Linked Patient Survey Study. Pulm. Ther. 2019, 5, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Rabe, K.F.; Hurst, J.R.; Suissa, S. Cardiovascular disease and COPD: Dangerous liaisons? Eur. Respir. Rev. 2018, 27, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sekine, Y.; Katsura, H.; Koh, E.; Hiroshima, K.; Fujisawa, T. Early detection of COPD is important for lung cancer surveillance. Eur. Respir. J. 2012, 39, 1230–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Jimborean, G.; Szasz, S.; Szathmary, M.; Csipor, A.; Arghir, O.; Nemes, R.; Postolache, P.; Ianosi, E.S. Association Between Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Sleep Apnea—Overlap Syndrome—Experience of Pulmonology Clinic Tg. Mures, Romania. Rev. Chim. Buchar. 2018, 69, 1014–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Budin, C.; Maierean, A.; Ianosi, E.S.; Socaci, A.; Buzoianu, A.D.; Alexescu, T.; Olteanu, M.; Rusu, E.; Moldovan, A.; Nemes, R.M. Nocturnal hypoxemia, a key parameter in overlap syndrome. Rev. Chim. Buchar. 2019, 70, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Matte, D.L.; Pizzichini, M.M.M.; Hoepers, A.T.C.; Diaz, A.P.; Karloh, M.; Dias, M.; Pizzichini, E. Prevalence of depression in COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies. Respir. Med. 2016, 117, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gershon, A.; Croxford, R.; Calzavara, A.; To, T.; Stanbrook, M.B.; Upshur, R.; Stukel, T.A. Cardiovascular safety of inhaled long-acting bronchodilators in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA Intern. Med. 2013, 173, 1175–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Singh, S.; Loke, Y.K.; Furberg, C.D. Inhaled anticholinergics and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2008, 300, 1439–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Calverley, P.M.; Anderson, J.A.; Celli, B.; Ferguson, G.T.; Jenkins, C.; Jones, P.W.; Crim, C.; Willits, L.R.; Yates, J.C.; Vestbo, J. Cardiovascular events in patients with COPD: TORCH study results. Thorax 2010, 65, 719–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Tashkin, D.P.; Celli, B.; Senn, S.; Burkhart, D.; Kesten, S.; Menjoge, S.; Decramer, M. A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 1543–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Papi, A.; Vestbo, J.; Fabbri, L.; Corradi, M.; Prunier, H.; Cohuet, G.; Guasconi, A.; Montagna, I.; Vezzoli, S.; Petruzzelli, S.; et al. Extrafine inhaled triple therapy versus dual bronchodilator therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (TRIBUTE): A double-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2018, 391, 1076–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lipson, D.A.; Barnacle, H.; Birk, R.; Brealey, N.; Locantore, N.; Lomas, D.A.; Ludwig-Sengpiel, A.; Mohindra, R.; Tabberer, M.; Zhu, C.-Q.; et al. FULFIL Trial: Once-Daily Triple Therapy for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 196, 438–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Mahler, D.A.; Kerwin, E.; Ayers, T.; Taylor, A.F.; Maitra, S.; Thach, C.; Lloyd, M.; Patalano, F.; Banerji, D. FLIGHT1 and FLIGHT2: Efficacy and safety of QVA149 (indacaterol/glycopyrrolate) versus its monocomponents and placebo in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 192, 1068–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Calzetta, L.; Rogliani, P.; Matera, M.G.; Cazzola, M. A systematic review with meta-analysis of dual bronchodilation with LAMA/LABA for the treatment of stable COPD. Chest 2016, 149, 1181–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wedzicha, J.A.; Banerji, D.; Chapman, K.R.; Vestbo, J.; Roche, N.; Ayers, R.T.; Thach, C.; Fogel, R.; Patalano, F.; Vogelmeier, C.F.; et al. Indacaterol–glycopyrronium versus salmeterol–fluticasone for COPD. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 2222–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Stafyla, E.; Kotsiou, O.S.; Deskata, K.; Gourgoulianis, K.I. Missed diagnosis and overtreatment of COPD among smoking primary care population in Central Greece: Old problems persist. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2018, 13, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Spyratos, D.; Chloros, D.; Michalopoulou, D.; Sichletidis, L. Estimating the extent and economic impact of under and overdiagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care. Chron. Respir. Dis. 2016, 13, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Price, D.; West, D.; Brusselle, G.; Gruffydd-Jones, K.; Jones, R.; Miravitlles, M.; Rossi, A.; Hutton, C.; Ashton, V.L.; Stewart, R.; et al. Management of COPD in the UK primary-care setting: An analysis of real-life prescribing patterns. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2014, 9, 889–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Petite, S.E. Characterization of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prescribing patterns in the United States. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 49, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wei, Y.-F.; Kuo, P.-H.; Tsai, Y.-H.; Tao, C.-W.; Cheng, S.-L.; Lee, C.-H.; Wu, Y.-K.; Chen, N.-H.; Hsu, W.-H.; Hsu, J.-Y.; et al. Factors associated with the prescription of inhaled corticosteroids in GOLD group A and B patients with COPD–subgroup analysis of the Taiwan obstructive lung disease cohort. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2015, 10, 1951–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Ivanov, Y.; Nikolaev, I.; Nemeth, I. Real-life evaluation of COPD treatment in a Bulgarian population: A 1-year prospective, observational, noninterventional study. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2018, 13, 653–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Desalu, O.O.; Onyedum, C.C.; Adeoti, A.O.; Gundiri, L.B.; Fadare, J.O.; Adekeye, K.A.; Onyeri, K.D.; Fawibe, A.E. Guideline-based COPD management in a resource-limited setting-physicians′ understanding, adherence, and barriers: A cross-sectional survey of internal and family medicine hospital-based physicians in Nigeria. Prim. Care Respir. J. 2013, 22, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Cataldo, D.; Derom, E.; Liistro, G.; Marchand, E.; Ninane, V.; Peché, R.; Slabbynck, H.; Vincken, W.; Janssens, W. Overuse of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD: Five questions for withdrawal in daily practice. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2018, 13, 2089–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Jebrak, G. COPD routine management in France: Are guidelines used in clinical practice? Rev. Mal. Respir. 2010, 27, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive of Pulmonary Disease. 2020 Report. Available online: https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/GOLD-2020-FINAL-ver1.2-03Dec19_WMV.pdf (accessed on 9 May 2020).
Figure 1. Percentages of appropriate and inappropriate medical therapy according to the 2017 GOLD guidelines (n = 348).
Figure 1. Percentages of appropriate and inappropriate medical therapy according to the 2017 GOLD guidelines (n = 348).
Medicina 56 00422 g001
Table 1. Criteria of appropriate and inappropriate treatments according to 2017 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines.
Table 1. Criteria of appropriate and inappropriate treatments according to 2017 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines.
Guideline-Concordant (Appropriate)Guideline-Discordant (Inappropriate)
GroupFirst ChoiceAlternative ChoiceUndertreatmentOvertreatment
ASABA or SAMAChange the bronchodilatorNo bronchodilatorLABA + LAMA, ICS-containing regimen
BLAMA or LABALAMA + LABAOnly short-acting bronchodilatorICS + LABA, ICS + LABA + LAMA, ICS + LAMA
CLAMALAMA + LABA or ICS/LABAOnly ICS or LABA or SABAICS + LABA + LAMA, ICS + LAMA
DLAMA + LABA or LAMA or ICS/LABAIf further exacerbations/symptoms ICS + LABA + LAMAOnly ICS or LABA or SABA, ICS + LAMA
Abbreviations: GOLD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; SABA, short-acting beta agonist; LABA, long-acting β2-agonists; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonist; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; SAMA, short-acting antimuscarinic agents.
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.
VariableFrequency (n = 348)
Age (years, mean (SD))68.61 (10.61)
Gender
Male, n (%)252 (72.41)
Female, n (%)96 (27.59)
White race, n (%)348 (100)
Location of residency
Urban191 (54.89)
Rural157 (45.11)
Smoking history, n (%)235 (67.53)
Current56 (23.83)
Former149 (63.40)
Never30 (12.77)
Pack-years (mean (SD)) (n = 117)40 (14.86)
Cardiovascular comorbidity, n (%) 147 (42.24)
Chronic respiratory failure, n (%)115 (33.04)
Spirometric GOLD grade, n (%)
GOLD 132 (9.20)
GOLD 2132 (37.93)
GOLD 393 (26.72)
GOLD 491 (26.15)
GOLD group, n (%)
A21 (6.03)
B143 (41.09)
C85 (24.43)
D99 (28.45)
SD—standard deviation
Table 3. Maintenance pharmacological regimens used for COPD management across the GOLD ABCD groups.
Table 3. Maintenance pharmacological regimens used for COPD management across the GOLD ABCD groups.
TherapyAllGroup AGroup BGroup CGroup D
SABA, n (%) 7 (2.01)5 (23.81)1 (0.7)0 (0)1 (1.01)
LABA, n (%)4 (1.15)0 (0)4 (2.8)0 (0)0 (0)
LAMA, n (%) 66 (18.97)9 (42.86)43 (30.07)11 (12.94)3 (3.03)
LAMA + LABA, n (%)121 (34.77)6 (28.57)48 (33.57)41 (48.24)26 (26.26)
ICS, n (%)1 (0.29)0 (0)1 (0.7)0 (0)0 (0)
LABA + ICS, n (%)62 (17.82)1 (4.76)30 (20.98)17 (20)14 (14.14)
LAMA + LABA + ICS, n (%)84 (24.14)0 (0)14 (9.79)16 (18.82)54 (54.55)
No therapy3 (0.86)0 (0)2 (1.40)0 (0)1 (1.01)
Table 4. Influencing factors of appropriate or inappropriate therapies according to the 2017 GOLD guidelines.
Table 4. Influencing factors of appropriate or inappropriate therapies according to the 2017 GOLD guidelines.
VariableConcordant
(n = 275)
Discordant
(n = 73)
p Value
Age (mean, (SD))68.90 (10.31)67.53 (11.66)0.363 a
Male, n (%)201 (73.09)51 (69.86)0.583 b
Rural, n (%)130 (47.27)27 (36.98)0.116 b
Chronic respiratory failure, n (%)115 (41.82)31 (42.47)0.92 b
Cardiovascular comorbidities, n (%)147 (53.45)50 (68.49)0.02 b
First consultation, n (%)41 (14.91)10 (13.69)0.794 b
Groups A and B (n) vs. Groups C and D (n)109 vs. 16655 vs. 180.0000001 b
a t-test for independent samples; b chi-squared test.
Table 5. Patient characteristics who were prescribed first-choice therapy compared to alternative-choice drugs.
Table 5. Patient characteristics who were prescribed first-choice therapy compared to alternative-choice drugs.
VariableFirst-Choice
(n = 91)
Alternative-Choice
(n = 184)
p Value
Age (mean, (SD))67.65 (10.82)69.52 (10.02)0.171 a
Male, n (%)59 (64.83)142 (77.17)0.029 b
Rural, n (%)40 (43.96)90 (48.91)0.438 b
Chronic respiratory failure, n (%)23 (25.27)92 (50)0.00009 b
Cardiovascular comorbidities, n (%)147 (53.45)50 (68.49)0.869 b
First consultation, n (%)41 (14.91)10 (13.69)0.002 b
a t-test for independent samples; b chi-squared test.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rajnoveanu, R.-M.; Rajnoveanu, A.-G.; Ardelean, A.-B.; Todea, D.A.; Pop, C.-M.; Antoniu, S.A.; Motoc, N.S.; Chis, A.F.; Fildan, A.P.; Man, M.A. Pulmonologists Adherence to the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease GOLD Guidelines: A Goal to Improve. Medicina 2020, 56, 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090422

AMA Style

Rajnoveanu R-M, Rajnoveanu A-G, Ardelean A-B, Todea DA, Pop C-M, Antoniu SA, Motoc NS, Chis AF, Fildan AP, Man MA. Pulmonologists Adherence to the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease GOLD Guidelines: A Goal to Improve. Medicina. 2020; 56(9):422. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090422

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rajnoveanu, Ruxandra-Mioara, Armand-Gabriel Rajnoveanu, Andreea-Bianca Ardelean, Doina Adina Todea, Carmen-Monica Pop, Sabina Antonela Antoniu, Nicoleta Stefania Motoc, Ana Florica Chis, Ariadna Petronela Fildan, and Milena Adina Man. 2020. "Pulmonologists Adherence to the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease GOLD Guidelines: A Goal to Improve" Medicina 56, no. 9: 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56090422

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop