Next Article in Journal
Projecting Lifetime Health Outcomes and Costs Associated with the Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Exposure among Adult Women in Korea
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Risk of Birth Defects Related to the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology: An Updated Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Sarcopenic Obesity Tendency and Nutritional Status Is Related to the Risk of Sarcopenia, Frailty, Depression and Quality of Life in Patients with Dementia
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Relationship between Social Support, Self-Efficacy and Characteristics of Women with Diabetes during Pregnancy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Environmental Toxicants and Preterm Birth: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends and Output

by
Manuel S. Vidal, Jr.
1,*,
Ramkumar Menon
2,
Gracia Fe B. Yu
3 and
Melissa D. Amosco
4
1
College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila 1000, Philippines
2
Division of Basic Science and Translational Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555, USA
3
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila 1000, Philippines
4
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila 1000, Philippines
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(5), 2493; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052493
Submission received: 14 January 2022 / Revised: 8 February 2022 / Accepted: 10 February 2022 / Published: 22 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Obstetrics and Gynecology in Public Health)

Abstract

:
Preterm birth remains a problem globally, as multiple factors contribute to its etiology and pathogenesis. One such factor is the exposure to environmental toxicants, in which recent literature has described contributory roles in disease progression. This study aims to show research trends and collaborations in papers related to environmental toxicants and preterm birth through a bibliometric analysis to determine hot spots for research as well as to identify already established themes that can point to policy making and development. Using the Scopus database, we were able to identify 956 original research articles from 72 countries between 1955 and 2021; bibliographic information was exported, analyzed, and visualized using Bibliometrix and VOSviewer. There was an annual growth of research and reporting in this area, which significantly increased within the last two decades. The top countries that have published on this topic include the USA (n = 343), China (n = 103), and Australia (n = 43), with strong international collaboration in reports from China. Top journals for publication include Environmental Research (n = 53), Environmental Health Perspectives (n = 47), and Environment International (n = 46). Previous literature focused on establishing toxicants that are significantly associated with preterm birth, with current research focusing on molecular mechanisms of environmental toxicants. Overall, our bibliometric analysis gives a scoping view of the existing research landscape in terms of environmental health and preterm birth.

1. Introduction

Preterm birth remains a persistent problem in the world, with annual rates ranging from 5–18% of all infants born globally [1]. Although multiple etiologies have already been proposed that contribute to preterm delivery, only a few of these factors have been well studied and reported due to greater research into those aspects. For instance, infection is well established to lead to inflammation that may lead to early spontaneous preterm birth [2]. Intrauterine bleeding activates thrombin and leads to cytokine and chemokine influx that induces myometrial contractions, resulting in preterm birth [3]. Uterine distension, either via polyhydramnios, multiple gestations, or congenital abnormalities, induces stretch receptor-mediated inflammatory responses that may also lead to preterm birth [4].
One of the emerging risk factors for preterm birth is environmental toxicants. The catalog comprises a vast array of chemicals, ranging from organic pollutants (persistent, non-persistent, and water disinfectants), metals (lead, arsenic, mercury, cadmium), and air pollutants (gases, particulate matter, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, and tobacco smoke) [5]. In varying degrees, these compounds have been shown to lead to increased rates of premature delivery, from small to large positive associations. As examples, exposure to high levels of organochlorine pesticides such as DDT were linked to higher risks of preterm delivery [6,7]. Multiple reports on air pollution and particulate matter showed strong associations with preterm birth, especially for women with prior preterm birth [8,9,10]. Metal exposure, especially lead and cadmium, appear to increase risks of preterm birth as well [11].
More studies are still needed to understand the mechanisms of the environment and toxicant exposure on pregnancy outcomes. Analysis of a two-decade research output on preterm birth demonstrated that research regarding “Public, Environment, and Occupational Health” and preterm birth only had a marginal increase in the share of preterm birth research, from 0.6% in 1997 to 1.0% in 2016 [12]. A combination of industrialization and gaps in local policies on pollution would naturally lead to increases in exposure of vulnerable populations, specifically pregnant women, to environmental toxicants [13]. Therefore, scoping the literature regarding the progress in research in this field can potentially determine knowledge gaps to address through future research as well as identify already established themes that can guide policy making and development.
Bibliometric analysis provides a powerful avenue to view how overall research in a field progresses over time. Tracking multiple quantitative parameters in terms of journal, author, country, keywords, and article citations through bibliometrics enables researchers to develop conceptual, intellectual, and social structures that can be analyzed [14]. Multiple softwares are available as open sources for bibliometric analysis. One tool that can be used is Bibliometrix, a science mapping software that runs as an R package. It runs a partner web interface app, Biblioshiny, that allows running of command line functions in a more convenient, user-friendly manner [15]. Visualization tools for keyword co-occurrence and author co-authorship networks can be done natively, but one application commonly used is the Java-run VOSviewer [16]. Using these two tools, we set out to perform bibliometric analysis regarding research on environmental toxicants and preterm birth.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Selection

An extensive systematic search of literature was performed using the Scopus database [17]. We utilized the search argument [(“environmental toxi*” OR “toxicants” OR “pollut*” OR metal* OR arsenic OR cadmium OR mercury OR smoke OR particulate OR dde OR pcb OR hch OR hcb OR bisphenol OR phthalate OR phenyl OR pesticide OR dioxin OR pfc OR pfoa OR pfos OR ddt OR pah ) AND (“preterm birth” OR “premature birth” OR “premature delivery” OR “decreased gestational age”)]. We limited our search to full-text original articles as well as open access articles published from 1955–2021. We excluded review articles and letters/notes. An electronic search was performed on 29 August 2021.

2.2. Data Collection

A total of 956 bibliographic records were downloaded from the Scopus database. The following metadata were obtained: authors, title, year of publication, source title, citation count, source type, DOI, affiliations, publisher, editors, language, correspondence address, abstract, author keywords, index keywords, and references. The 2021 impact factor was obtained from the master journal list of Clarivate [18].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis and graph generation were undertaken using the Biblioshiny package of the Bibliometrix package version 3.1 of R version 4.1 (R Studio version 1.4.1717) [15]. The visualization of co-occurrences of keywords related to environmental toxicants and preterm birth as well as co-authorship networks were conducted using VOSviewer version 1.6.16 [16].

3. Results

We included a total of 908 journal articles spanning from 1955 to 2021, obtained from 385 source documents. The average annual growth rate for publications regarding preterm birth and environmental toxicants is estimated at 1.63%, and the trend is shown in Figure 1.
The most impactful journal article was by Michael Brauer, entitled “A Cohort Study of Traffic-Related Air Pollution Impacts on Birth Outcomes “ (local citation (LC) = 71, global citation (GC) = 419, LC/GC ratio = 16.95). Two of the three most impactful journal articles belonged to Beate Ritz, entitled “Effect of air pollution on preterm birth among children born in Southern California between 1989 and 1993” (LC = 67, GC = 263 LC/GC ratio = 25.48) and another study entitled “Ambient air pollution and preterm birth in the environment and pregnancy outcomes study at the University of California, Los Angeles” (LC = 60, GC = 263, LC/GC ratio = 22.81). Data are summarized in Table 1.

3.1. Publications by Journals

The top journals with the highest number of published research were Environmental Research (n = 53 articles, total citations (TC) = 1289 h-index = 21, impact factor (IF) = 6.498), followed by Environmental Health Perspectives (n = 47, TC = 4662, h-index = 35, IF = 9.031), and then Environment International (n = 46, TC = 1215, h-index = 20, IF = 9.621). The top 10 journals also comprise core sources among 369 journals publishing about the topic as shown in Figure 2, along with PLoS ONE, Environmental Pollution, and Placenta. Among the top 10 journals, six of these are relevant to environmental themes, two emphasize epidemiological relevance (American Journal of Epidemiology, Epidemiology), while two cater to obstetrics, gynecology, and child health (American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal and Child Health). The results are summarized in Table 2.

3.2. Publication by Authors

The top authors who have published the highest number of papers were John Meeker of the School of Public Health, University of Michigan (n = 27, fractional authorship (FA) = 2.328, h-index = 18, TC = 321), Ramkumar Menon of the University of Texas Medical Branch (n = 21, FA = 3.94, h-index = 12, TC = 560 ), and Kelly Ferguson of the US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) (n = 20, FA = 3.26, h-index = 16, TC = 1097). Data are shown in Table 3. Only around 1.98% of all authors have published at least four papers, with 81.4% of all authors only publishing a single paper. Co-authorship network visualization reveals multiple clusters of co-authorship with major clustering around authors from China, as seen in Figure 3.

3.3. Publications by Institutions

The top institutions publishing regarding the topic of interest include the University of California, California, USA (n = 97), followed by the Harvard University (Harvard Medical School and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health), Massachusetts, USA (n = 91), and the University of Michigan (University of Michigan and University of Michigan School of Public Health), Michigan, USA (n = 67). Two of the 10 institutions are outside the United States (Peking University, Beijing, China and Sun-Yat Sen University, Guangzhou, China). Results are summarized in Table 4.

3.4. Publications by Countries

The top countries that have published the highest number of papers include the USA (n = 343, single country publications (SCP) = 284, multiple countries publication (MCP) = 59, MCP ratio = 0.1720, TC = 13798), China (n = 103, SCP = 62, MCP = 42, MCP ratio = 0.398, TC = 1848), and Australia (n = 41, SCP = 35, MCP = 216 MCP ratio = 0.0.1463, TC = 923). Results are shown in Table 5 and Figure 4.

3.5. Keyword Visualization

We identified three time periods, from 1955–2000, 2001–2012, and 2013–present, as we observed that there was a spike in citations for 2000 (number of references = 453) due to the publication of Ritz et al. (“Effect of air pollution on preterm birth among children born in Southern California between 1989 and 1993”) and the peak of publication references was reached at 2012 (number of references = 2304). We analyzed thematic evolution of author keywords over these three time periods through thematic maps shown in Figure 5. From 1955–2000, there were two transversal themes (“preterm birth” and “smoking”) with a single well-developed theme (“birth weight”). From 2001–2012, we saw a burst of motor and transversal themes. Highly developed themes were research involving “development”, “chorioamnionitis”, “air pollutants” and “cancer”. Basic themes involved research on “pesticides”, “environment”, “placenta”. “Birth weight” and “preterm birth” converged into a single basic theme of “preterm birth”. From 2013–present, “pesticides” diverged into research on “prenatal exposure” and “premature birth”, “placenta” diverged into two additional themes on “progesterone receptor” and “inflammation”. Research on “cadmium” converged with “placenta”. “Preterm birth” and “preterm delivery” diverged into “preterm birth”/”premature birth” and “pregnancy outcomes”. Studies on “metals” and “progesterone receptor” appeared and were relegated as niche themes.
Co-occurrence analysis was also undertaken, as shown in Figure 6. Overall, four clusters of keywords were observed. These were designated as relating to human studies (red), air and particulate matter pollution (blue), environmental pollutants (yellow), and molecular studies on non-human and tissue/cellular samples (green).

4. Discussion

Although there is a multitude of studies that explore the association between environmental toxicants and preterm birth, no analysis has been undertaken yet that identifies global research output and trends in this field. This paper shows also the main contributors to the field of study, as well as publication preferences and regional output.
Early research has focused on effects of smoking on preterm birth and birth weight. A meta-analysis published in 2000 demonstrated a 1.27 pooled estimate risk for preterm delivery among maternal smokers when compared to non-smokers [19]. Although multiple papers have been published regarding preterm birth and smoking, only a few papers have delved into the component-specific mechanisms responsible for adverse outcomes [20]. In our thematic analysis, preterm birth slowly merged with smoking over the time slices, fitting so since it has already been established as a risk factor for preterm birth. Meanwhile, research on environmental pollutants, such as persistent organic pollutants and metals contaminants, occurred near the year 2000, and the following decade saw an increase in papers publishing about these pollutants.
Particularly interesting is air pollution, as papers about its association with preterm birth along with particulate matter were published in the 2000s. The following decade saw cohort studies by Ritz and Brauer on the impact of air pollution, and our analysis showed that these articles have been the most impactful in terms of local as well as global citations [8,9,10]. Ritz et al. observed a preterm birth risk ratio of 1.20 for those exposed to ambient levels of particulate matter (PM) <10 μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM10), and elevated risks as well for those exposed to carbon monoxide and PM2.5 [8,9]. Brauer observed associations with PM2.5 and preterm births <37 weeks, with other air pollutants associated with preterm birth at <30 weeks [10]. These papers essentially established air pollution as a risk factor, and over the years it converged as well with preterm birth in our thematic analysis.
We observed a peak in publication in this area within the last 10 years, especially in 2014, 2016, and 2020. During the last decade, the bigger themes included “placenta” and “inflammation” as well as the niche theme “progesterone receptor”, indicating that research now tend to delve into the mechanisms of preterm birth with exposure to environmental toxicants. Time sensitivity has also been explored in this period, since “prenatal exposure” also appeared. Most of the research also involve “pregnancy outcomes”, perhaps indicating that the latest publications also examine postpartum impacts such as birth weight and infant disabilities. From research on cadmium in the second time period, now the latest research includes other “metals” as a niche theme and may relate to molecular mechanisms as well.
There is also a regional imbalance in terms of global research output. The top countries in which most of the research has been done are highly industrialized countries such as the United States and China. Top authors in the field also are stationed in the United States, with Drs Meeker and Ferguson publishing mostly on epidemiological evidence of preterm birth and adverse pregnancy outcome association with multiple environmental pollutants. Dr Menon’s work is primarily focusing on mechanistic studies on how pollutants such as cigarette smoke, PBDE, and BPA/BPS cause preterm birth [21,22,23]. Interestingly, articles published in China had a higher intensity of international collaboration compared to their American counterparts. Also, most researchers as observed in the co-authorship network plot tend to concentrate on Chinese authors, with outside clusters of American or other European/North American origin. In particular, air pollution is widely explored in China as there are higher pollution levels along with genetic differences in comparison to other populations [24,25]. In the United States, air pollution has also been widely explored along with other environmental pollutants such as pesticides and metals/metalloids, among others [5]. Indeed, economic development and environmental pollution are two inseparable themes, as the increase in demand for infrastructure resources along with increased consumption of pollution-intensive resources may lead to pollution especially in developing countries [26]. Although considerable evidence can be obtained from developed countries, there must also be representative research in developing countries in order to fully estimate the impact of these environmental pollutants in terms of adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, research endeavors on this topic may be limited in these countries depending on the country’s health research agenda, local institutions that cater to the research topic, and also by the individual country’s research spending [27]. Developing countries such as India, where pollution-related health issues are rampant, are yet to report on environmental impacts on preterm birth.
We also observed that most authors tend to publish in high-impact journals on environmental health. Although Environmental Research has the highest number of papers, Environmental Health Perspectives has a much higher h-index and total citations thus making it the most impactful journal. The latter is also published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/NIEHS, and may play a role in its impact within the local community [28]. Although the inclusion of two obstetrics and child health journals within the top 10 is not surprising, more interesting would be the inclusion of two epidemiological research journals. Thus, it can be inferred that this research area is not only relegated to purely clinical aspects, but is also a pressing public health concern that needs an epidemiological assessment and action [29].
The strength of this study involves the use of two different software for bibliometric analysis and network visualization. Bibliometrix, among other bibliometric tools for science mapping analysis, stands out with its intuitive interface as well as the incorporation of powerful features, such as evolution analysis, performance analysis, and reference spectroscopy; VOSviewer on the other hand allows for a more intensive network visualization through three-step co-occurrence matrix creation, zoom and scroll option, and smart labeling to avoid overlaps [30].
One limitation of this study is that only a single database was used for the literature search. However, by using the Scopus database, we are confident that the most relevant literature in the field has been captured since Scopus allows for greater coverage for citation analysis and journal range compared to other big databases such as Web of Science, Pubmed, or Google Scholar [31]. Future research may combine our results with literature retrieved from other databases in order to have a comprehensive look at research trends in environmental pollution and preterm birth. Another limitation of this study is that only full-text research articles were included, and review articles, editorials, and position/hypothesis papers were excluded. Nonetheless, this paper provides a robust overview of the research progress in terms of environmental toxicants and preterm birth.

5. Conclusions

Our bibliometric analysis demonstrates the research trends and research collaborations among researchers in the field of environmental toxicants and preterm birth since 1955. Currently, research in this subject matter seems to expand beyond epidemiological association studies and gradually delve into mechanistic studies. Although annual production in this field has grown substantially within the last two decades, overall growth is still small despite massive industrialization and increased exposure to environmental pollution. The research has evolved from establishing significant environmental toxicants to exploring the molecular mechanisms of action of these pollutants. Most studies were from developed countries and further representation of developing countries is needed for researchers to gain a better picture of the current state of science and evidence related to preterm birth. Increasing research involvement in such countries may help form local and global policies on pollution control in order to reduce the incidence of preterm birth.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, literature search, and analysis, M.S.V.J.; writing—review and editing, R.M., G.F.B.Y., M.D.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by the College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila; the MD-PhD in Molecular Medicine Committee of the College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila; and the Department of Science and Technology-Philippine Council for Health Research and Development (DOST-PCHRD), Philippines.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Enrico Paolo C. Banzuela, MSEd, MHPEd, FPSP for his kind assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. OECD. WHO Preterm Birth and Low Birth Weight; OECD: Paris, France, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lamont, R.F. Advances in the Prevention of Infection-Related Preterm Birth. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Nishimura, F.; Mogami, H.; Moriuchi, K.; Chigusa, Y.; Mandai, M.; Kondoh, E. Mechanisms of Thrombin-Induced Myometrial Contractions: Potential Targets of Progesterone. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Waldorf, K.M.A.; Singh, N.; Mohan, A.R.; Young, R.C.; Ngo, L.; Das, A.; Tsai, J.; Bansal, A.; Paolella, L.; Herbert, B.R.; et al. Uterine Overdistention Induces Preterm Labor Mediated by Inflammation: Observations in Pregnant Women and Nonhuman Primates. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 213, 830.e1–e830.e19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Ferguson, K.K.; Chin, H.B. Environmental Chemicals and Preterm Birth: Biological Mechanisms and the State of the Science. Curr. Epidemiol. Rep. 2017, 4, 56–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Bergonzi, R.; Palma, G.D.; Specchia, C.; Dinolfo, M.; Tomasi, C.; Frusca, T.; Apostoli, P. Persistent Organochlorine Compounds in Fetal and Maternal Tissues: Evaluation of Their Potential Influence on Several Indicators of Fetal Growth and Health. Sci. Total. Environ. 2011, 409, 2888–2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Pathak, R.; Ahmed, R.S.; Tripathi, A.K.; Guleria, K.; Sharma, C.S.; Makhijani, S.D.; Banerjee, B.D. Maternal and Cord Blood Levels of Organochlorine Pesticides: Association with Preterm Labor. Clin. Biochem. 2009, 42, 746–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ritz, B.; Wilhelm, M.; Hoggatt, K.J.; Ghosh, J.K.C. Ambient Air Pollution and Preterm Birth in the Environment and Pregnancy Outcomes Study at the University of California, Los Angeles. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 166, 1045–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ritz, B.; Yu, F.; Chapa, G.; Fruin, S. Effect of Air Pollution on Preterm Birth Among Children Born in Southern California Between 1989 and 1993. Epidemiology 2000, 11, 502–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Brauer, M.; Lencar, C.; Tamburic, L.; Koehoorn, M.; Demers, P.; Karr, C. A Cohort Study of Traffic-Related Air Pollution Impacts on Birth Outcomes. Environ. Health Persp. 2008, 116, 680–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Khanam, R.; Kumar, I.; Oladapo-Shittu, O.; Twose, C.; Islam, A.A.; Biswal, S.S.; Raqib, R.; Baqui, A.H. Prenatal Environmental Metal Exposure and Preterm Birth: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pu. 2021, 18, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Visser, L.; de Boer, M.A.; de Groot, C.J.M. Analysis of Publication Interest on Preterm Birth Over Two Decades. Matern. Child Health J. 2019, 23, 1392–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Institute of Medicine (US); Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Adverse Health Outcomes. The Role of Environmental Toxicants in Preterm Birth. In Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention; Behrman, R.E., Butler, A.S., Eds.; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  14. Toom, K. Chapter 10—Indicators. In The European Research Management Handbook—Europe and Beyond; Andersen, J., Toom, K., Poli, S., Miller, P., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2018; pp. 213–230. ISBN 9780128050590. [Google Scholar]
  15. Aria, M.; Cuccurullo, C. Bibliometrix: An R-Tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Scopus Database. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/home.uri (accessed on 29 August 2021).
  18. Web of Science Group. Web of Science Master Journal List. Available online: https://mjl.clarivate.com/ (accessed on 29 August 2021).
  19. Shah, N.R.; Bracken, M.B. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies on the Association between Maternal Cigarette Smoking and Preterm Delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000, 182, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ion, R.; Bernal, A.L. Smoking and Preterm Birth. Reprod. Sci. 2014, 22, 918–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Scopus Scopus Preview—Meeker, John D—Author Details. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?origin=resultslist&authorId=7003970613&zone= (accessed on 31 August 2021).
  22. Scopus Scopus Preview—Ferguson, Kelly K.—Author Details. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?origin=resultslist&authorId=47960986400&zone= (accessed on 31 August 2021).
  23. Scopus Scopus Preview—Menon, Ramkumar—Author Details. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?origin=resultslist&authorId=35566257700&zone= (accessed on 31 August 2021).
  24. Liu, W.-Y.; Yu, Z.-B.; Qiu, H.-Y.; Wang, J.-B.; Chen, X.-Y.; Chen, K. Association between Ambient Air Pollutants and Preterm Birth in Ningbo, China: A Time-Series Study. BMC Pediatr. 2018, 18, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, X.; Huang, S.; Jiao, A.; Yang, X.; Yun, J.; Wang, Y.; Xue, X.; Chu, Y.; Liu, F.; Liu, Y.; et al. Association between Ambient Fine Particulate Matter and Preterm Birth or Term Low Birth Weight: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 227, 596–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ali, S.H.; de Oliveira, J.A.P. Pollution and Economic Development: An Empirical Research Review. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 123003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Ballesteros-Pérez, P.; Skitmore, M.; Yang, G.; Philbin, S.P.; Lu, Q. Factors Influencing Environmental Performance: A Bibliometric Review and Future Research Agenda. Int. J. Urban Sci. 2021, pp. 1–27. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1899845 (accessed on 14 January 2022).
  28. Sciences, T.N.I. of E.H. Environmental Health Perspectives. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/journal/envihealpers (accessed on 14 January 2022).
  29. Etzel, R.A. Is the Environment Associated With Preterm Birth? Jama Netw. Open 2020, 3, e202239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Moral-Muñoz, J.A.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Santisteban-Espejo, A.; Cobo, M.J. Software Tools for Conducting Bibliometric Analysis in Science: An up-to-Date Review. El Profesional De La Información 2020, 29, e290103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Falagas, M.E.; Pitsouni, E.I.; Malietzis, G.A.; Pappas, G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and Weaknesses. FASEB J. 2007, 22, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Annual scientific production for articles on environmental toxicants and pollutants and preterm birth.
Figure 1. Annual scientific production for articles on environmental toxicants and pollutants and preterm birth.
Ijerph 19 02493 g001
Figure 2. Core sources for publications on environmental toxicants and pollutants and preterm birth.
Figure 2. Core sources for publications on environmental toxicants and pollutants and preterm birth.
Ijerph 19 02493 g002
Figure 3. Co-authorship network showing multiple clusters of co-authors, with centralization among a majority of Chinese authors.
Figure 3. Co-authorship network showing multiple clusters of co-authors, with centralization among a majority of Chinese authors.
Ijerph 19 02493 g003
Figure 4. Top countries publishing on environmental toxicants and pollutants and preterm birth.
Figure 4. Top countries publishing on environmental toxicants and pollutants and preterm birth.
Ijerph 19 02493 g004
Figure 5. Thematic evolution of author keywords from (A) 1973 to 2000, (B) 2000–2012, and (C) 2013–present.
Figure 5. Thematic evolution of author keywords from (A) 1973 to 2000, (B) 2000–2012, and (C) 2013–present.
Ijerph 19 02493 g005aIjerph 19 02493 g005b
Figure 6. Co-occurrence network showing four clusters of keywords relating to human studies (red), air and particulate matter pollution (blue), environmental pollutants (yellow), and molecular studies on non-human and tissue/cellular samples (green).
Figure 6. Co-occurrence network showing four clusters of keywords relating to human studies (red), air and particulate matter pollution (blue), environmental pollutants (yellow), and molecular studies on non-human and tissue/cellular samples (green).
Ijerph 19 02493 g006
Table 1. Most cited documents on environmental toxicants and pollutants and preterm birth.
Table 1. Most cited documents on environmental toxicants and pollutants and preterm birth.
DocumentTitle and DOIYearLocal CitationsGlobal CitationsLC/GC Ratio (%)Normalized Local CitationsNormalized Global Citations
Brauer M, 2008, Environ Health Perspect“A Cohort Study of Traffic-Related Air Pollution Impacts on Birth Outcomes”10.1289/ehp.1095220087141916.958.405.74
Ritz B, 2000, Epidemiology“Effect of air pollution on preterm birth among children born in Southern California between 1989 and 1993”10.1097/00001648-200009000-0000420006726325.483.721.52
Ritz B, 2007, Am J Epidemiol“Ambient air pollution and preterm birth in the environment and pregnancy outcomes study at the University of California, Los Angeles”10.1093/aje/kwm18120076026322.817.143.34
DOI: Digital object identifier, LC/GC Ratio: Local citations/Global citations ratio.
Table 2. Top journals that published regarding environmental toxicants and pollutants and preterm birth.
Table 2. Top journals that published regarding environmental toxicants and pollutants and preterm birth.
SourcesArticlesH-IndexTC
Environmental Research53211289
Environmental Health Perspectives47354662
Environment International46201215
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health238186
Science of the Total Environment2212413
Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source2114949
American Journal of Epidemiology19171274
Epidemiology18161366
American Journal of Obstetrics And Gynecology1613768
Maternal and Child Health Journal148300
TC: Total citations.
Table 3. Top authors that published regarding environmental toxicants and pollutants and preterm birth.
Table 3. Top authors that published regarding environmental toxicants and pollutants and preterm birth.
AuthorsArticlesArticles FractionalizedH-IndexTC
Meeker JD274.0718522
Menon R213.9412560
Ferguson KK203.26161097
McElrath TF172.9414890
Mukherjee B162.5213733
Ritz B133.39121664
Cordero JF111.246272
Calafat AM111.028502
Mendola P102.49612
Cantonwine DE91.249521
TC: Total citations.
Table 4. Top institutions that published regarding environmental toxicants and pollutants and preterm birth.
Table 4. Top institutions that published regarding environmental toxicants and pollutants and preterm birth.
AffiliationsArticles
University of California97
Harvard University91
University of Michigan67
Emory University30
Wayne State University25
Yale University25
Peking University20
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences19
University of South Florida19
Sun Yat-Sen University18
Table 5. Top countries that published regarding environmental toxicants and pollutants and preterm birth.
Table 5. Top countries that published regarding environmental toxicants and pollutants and preterm birth.
CountryArticlesTCSCPMCPMCP Ratio
USA34313,798284590.1720
China103184862410.3981
Australia419233560.1463
Canada39249718210.5385
United Kingdom29118118110.3793
Korea224791570.3182
France202631730.1500
Netherlands20136610100.5000
Italy184451350.2778
Japan175551250.2941
TC: Total citations, SCP: Single country publications, MCP: Multiple countries publications.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vidal, M.S., Jr.; Menon, R.; Yu, G.F.B.; Amosco, M.D. Environmental Toxicants and Preterm Birth: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends and Output. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2493. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052493

AMA Style

Vidal MS Jr., Menon R, Yu GFB, Amosco MD. Environmental Toxicants and Preterm Birth: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends and Output. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(5):2493. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052493

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vidal, Manuel S., Jr., Ramkumar Menon, Gracia Fe B. Yu, and Melissa D. Amosco. 2022. "Environmental Toxicants and Preterm Birth: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends and Output" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 5: 2493. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052493

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop