Next Article in Journal
Characterization of the cpt1b Gene in Response to a Tributyrin-Supplemented Diet: Cloning, Tissue-Specific Expression, and Intestinal Metabolic Function in Mandarin Fish (Siniperca chuatsi)
Previous Article in Journal
Decoding the Endometriosis-Associated Infertility Microenvironment: A Review of FTIR and Raman Spectroscopic Insights into Follicular Fluid
Previous Article in Special Issue
GPCR-Mediated Cell Intelligence: A Potential Mechanism for Survival and Long-Term Health
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

From Systemic Stress to Ovarian Failure: Heat Stress-Induced Infertility in Pigs as a Model for Reproductive Dysfunction

by
Ramanathan Kasimanickam
1,*,
Joao C. P. Ferreira
2 and
John P. Kastelic
3
1
College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
2
School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Botucatu 18618-81, SP, Brazil
3
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2026, 48(3), 304; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48030304
Submission received: 15 February 2026 / Revised: 9 March 2026 / Accepted: 10 March 2026 / Published: 12 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Current Issues in Molecular Biology)

Abstract

Heat stress (HS) occurs when animals are unable to effectively dissipate excess body heat, leading to increased core temperature and physiological imbalance. In mammals, HS negatively affects female reproduction. Infertility associated with HS is well documented in swine and is increasingly recognized in other mammals, including humans. HS disrupts several systemic processes that are essential for normal reproductive function, including endocrine regulation, nutrient metabolism, immune activity, and intestinal barrier integrity. Reduced feed intake and changes in metabolic hormones such as insulin and prolactin can impair ovarian function. Increased intestinal permeability during HS may allow bacterial endotoxins to enter the bloodstream, triggering inflammation that further compromises reproductive physiology. At the ovarian level, HS alters key cellular pathways involved in cell survival and metabolism, including Janus Kinase/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (JAK–STAT), Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase/Protein Kinase B (PI3K/AKT), oxidative stress responses, autophagy, apoptosis, and heat shock protein expression. These changes disrupt follicular development, hormone production, oocyte quality, and corpus luteum function, resulting in reduced conception rates and increased embryonic loss. This review summarizes current knowledge of systemic and ovarian mechanisms by which HS impairs female reproduction in pigs and identifies areas requiring further investigation to improve fertility under increasing environmental temperatures.

1. Introduction

Global environmental temperatures have steadily increased over recent decades, with an average rise of ~0.7 °C per decade, and projections suggesting a cumulative increase of 1–2 °C by 2050 [1,2,3]. This warming trend is accompanied by increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, including prolonged heatwaves, which pose challenges to human and animal health [4]. Elevated ambient temperatures are associated with increased incidence of infectious diseases, malnutrition, cardiovascular and respiratory disorders, and even mortality, particularly in vulnerable populations such as the elderly, young, and those with limited socioeconomic resources [5,6,7]. Urban heat islands and limited access to cooling technologies, such as air conditioning, further exacerbate heat-related health risks [8,9]. In this context, physiological effects of heat stress (HS) on mammals have become a major concern, with reproductive dysfunction emerging as a particularly sensitive end point.
In mammals, HS arises when environmental heat load, combined with endogenous metabolic heat production, exceeds the body’s capacity for heat dissipation [10]. Thermoregulatory mechanisms, including increased peripheral blood flow, sweating, and panting, facilitate heat dissipation and maintenance of thermal homeostasis. However, prolonged or severe heat exposure can exceed adaptive capacity, resulting in physiological dysfunction. In production animals such as swine, heat stress is associated with reduced growth performance, decreased lactation efficiency, impaired feed efficiency, and compromised reproductive function [11]. Female reproduction is highly sensitive to HS, with consequences ranging from anovulation and impaired estrous cyclicity to decreased conception rates, early embryonic loss, and pregnancy failure [12,13,14]. In pigs, seasonal infertility, most pronounced during summer and early autumn in North America, is widely recognized and reflects the detrimental effects of heat-associated metabolic and energetic challenges on reproductive efficiency [15].
Heat stress (HS) imposes significant challenges to female reproductive physiology, particularly in livestock species such as pigs [16]. While various mammalian models have been used to study HS-induced infertility, this review focuses primarily on the porcine model due to its agricultural importance and translational relevance [16,17]. References to other species—including murine and bovine studies—are included selectively to provide mechanistic context and to highlight conserved pathways, but pigs remain the central system for examining how heat stress affects ovarian function, folliculogenesis, and endocrine regulation.
The porcine model is especially relevant for studying HS-induced reproductive dysfunction due to its agricultural importance and translational value for human reproductive physiology [18,19]. Pigs share several physiological and reproductive similarities with humans, including comparable ovarian architecture, folliculogenesis dynamics, steroidogenic regulation, and endocrine signaling pathways. These similarities make the porcine ovary a valuable system for investigating mechanisms that may extend beyond livestock species. Importantly, many intracellular pathways disrupted by heat stress—including the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT) signaling pathway, Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK–STAT) signaling, inflammatory cascades, and oxidative stress–mediated responses—are highly conserved across mammalian systems [20,21]. Consequently, mechanistic insights derived from porcine ovarian responses to heat stress may provide broader biological understanding of how thermal stress perturbs follicular development, oocyte competence, and overall ovarian function. Recognizing these conserved mechanisms strengthens the translational relevance of the porcine model for investigating fundamental pathways underlying heat stress–associated reproductive impairment.
Importantly, HS affects both systemic and ovarian-specific processes, influencing endocrine signaling, nutrient metabolism, immune responses, and cellular stress pathways, each of which can independently or synergistically compromise fertility. At the ovarian level, HS alters key intracellular signaling pathways, including JAK–STAT, PI3K/AKT, toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)–mediated inflammatory signaling, oxidative stress regulation, and heat shock protein expression [22,23]. These molecular disruptions affect ovarian follicle development, steroid hormone synthesis, and corpus luteum (CL) function, ultimately reducing reproductive success.
This review aims to synthesize current knowledge on how HS affects female reproduction in pigs, emphasizing both systemic physiological changes and direct ovarian impacts. We highlight key mechanisms underlying fertility impairment, including hypophagia, intestinal hyperpermeability, endocrine dysregulation, and molecular alterations in the ovary. By focusing on the porcine model, this work provides a detailed mechanistic framework that can inform agricultural management practices and translational research into human reproductive health. Furthermore, it identifies critical gaps in understanding, including temporal dynamics, tissue-specific vulnerabilities, and potential strategies for mitigation, which are essential for developing interventions to preserve fertility under increasingly common HS conditions.

2. Heat Stress and Its Multifaceted Disruption of Female Reproduction

HS exerts profound negative effects on female reproductive function across mammalian species, with consequences ranging from altered ovarian activity to impaired pregnancy outcomes. In pigs, HS has been associated with anovulation, decreased conception rates, and compromised pregnancy maintenance, highlighting the vulnerability of the female reproductive system to elevated ambient temperatures [12,13,14]. These reproductive impairments are not unique to swine; studies in cattle demonstrate that in vitro exposure of preovulatory follicles to HS decreases estradiol (E2) production in granulosa cells [24,25], reduces oocyte competence [26,27], and ultimately diminishes fertility outcomes in vivo [28,29].
Beyond ovarian follicular development, HS negatively affects embryonic and fetal growth. In ruminants, particularly cattle, exposure to elevated ambient temperatures during early gestation adversely affects embryonic development [30,31] and is associated with restricted fetal growth later in pregnancy [32,33,34]. Similarly, in swine, in utero heat stress has persistent postnatal effects, including elevated core body temperature and altered body composition characterized by increased adiposity, with evidence of disrupted somatic and organ development [35,36]. Comparable outcomes have been reported in ruminants, demonstrating that gestational heat exposure can alter thermoregulation and productivity in postnatal life [37].
In humans, effects of elevated ambient temperatures on female reproductive physiology are increasingly evident. Women exposed to higher temperatures have reduced antral follicle counts, an indicator of diminished ovarian reserve [38], and increased risk of stillbirth [39]. Interestingly, HS tolerance in women is influenced by the menstrual cycle, with improved heat tolerance during the luteal phase, suggesting that sex steroid profiles may modulate thermoregulatory capacity [40]. Pregnancy represents a particularly sensitive window for HS effects; maternal hyperthermia elevates risks of miscarriage [41], hypertension [42], and preterm birth. Analysis of birth outcomes following the 1995 Chicago heat wave revealed a significant association between extreme heat exposure and preterm birth, with disparities across racial groups [43].
Deleterious effects of HS on female reproduction arise from both direct and indirect mechanisms. Elevated temperatures can directly impair ovarian function and embryonic development; in addition, systemic physiological alterations also contribute to infertility. These systemic effects include reduced nutrient intake, intestinal hyperpermeability (“leaky gut”), systemic inflammation, and endocrine dysregulation, all of which can compromise reproductive competence, even in the absence of overt hyperthermia of reproductive organs (Figure 1). Understanding these interconnected pathways is essential for identifying mitigation strategies and elucidating the multifactorial nature of HS-induced reproductive dysfunction.
HS elicits a variety of systemic physiological alterations, many of which independently compromise reproductive function. These include hypophagia and reduced nutritional intake, intestinal hyperpermeability and endotoxemia, systemic inflammation, and endocrine dysregulation. The subsequent sections elaborate on these mechanisms and their potential contributions to fertility impairment.

2.1. Heat Stress, Reduced Feed Intake, and Consequences for Female Reproduction

Heat stress commonly induces inappetence in mammals, including pigs, resulting in a reduced plane of nutrition and negative energy balance [11]. This decreased feed intake is an adaptive thermoregulatory response, as digestion of feed generates metabolic heat that further challenges thermal homeostasis. However, the resulting malnutrition has important consequences for reproductive function. In both humans and animals, undernutrition or caloric restriction is well-documented to impair fertility [44,45,46] by altering hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal signaling and depleting energy reserves necessary for ovarian function. Specifically, insufficient caloric intake can delay puberty, compromise ovarian follicular development, and reduce ovarian reserve, ultimately impairing fertility potential [47,48].
Metabolic hormones act as critical mediators linking nutrition and reproductive physiology. Leptin, secreted by adipose tissue, and ghrelin, produced by the stomach, are key regulators of energy homeostasis and reproductive maturation [49]. Reduced energy intake lowers circulating leptin and alters ghrelin dynamics, delaying puberty and disrupting gonadotropin secretion in both humans and livestock [50,51,52,53,54]. In dairy cattle, for instance, energy restriction during HS can explain up to 50% of reduced lactational performance [55], suggesting a substantial contribution of decreased nutrient intake to the overall physiological burden of HS. Although direct effects of reduced nutrition on fertility during HS are not fully quantified, it is plausible that energy deficits significantly exacerbate HS-induced reproductive dysfunction.
At the metabolic level, HS alters the serum metabolome in pre-pubertal pigs, highlighting systemic changes with potential reproductive implications [56]. For example, aminomalonic acid, a biomarker of protein oxidative stress, was reduced, reflecting altered protein metabolism and cellular stress responses. Serum campesterol concentrations were also decreased; campesterol, structurally similar to cholesterol, competes for absorption and can influence steroidogenesis, implying a potential pathway for endocrine disruption during HS [57]. Conversely, hydroxylamine concentrations were elevated under HS, raising concern due to its mutagenic properties [58]. Amino acid profiles in cumulus–oocyte complexes are also altered under thermal stress, potentially impairing oocyte maturation and competence [59,60].
A reduced plane of nutrition under HS not only deprives females of essential energy and metabolites for ovarian and reproductive function but also induces metabolomic and hormonal changes that may amplify infertility. This underscores the importance of considering nutritional status as a critical, yet often overlooked, factor in HS-induced reproductive impairment.

2.2. Gut Under Fire: Hidden Threats to Reproduction

Heat Stress imposes profound physiological challenges in mammals, particularly by disrupting vascular homeostasis to prioritize thermoregulation. During HS, blood is shunted from central organs, including the gastrointestinal tract, toward the periphery to facilitate convective and evaporative heat loss. This adaptive circulatory redistribution maintains core temperature but induces hypoperfusion of the intestine, particularly the jejunum and ileum, which are highly metabolically active and oxygen-dependent [61,62,63]. Enterocytes are extremely sensitive to oxygen and nutrient restriction, and even brief ischemia compromises tight junction integrity, mitochondrial function, and epithelial cell viability [64].
The resultant intestinal barrier dysfunction, commonly referred to as “leaky gut,” allows luminal contents, including microbial products, dietary antigens, and partially digested nutrients, to translocate into portal and systemic circulations [65,66,67]. HS-induced hyperpermeability has been consistently demonstrated across species, including rodents, ruminants, pigs, dogs, cats, and humans [68,69], underscoring its evolutionary conservation as a thermoregulatory tradeoff. The Gram-negative bacterial cell wall component lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is particularly notable because its entry into the circulation causes low-grade, chronic metabolic endotoxemia [70,71,72]. Unlike acute infection-induced endotoxemia, heat stress–associated endotoxemia is typically subclinical and may not elicit a febrile response, yet it can markedly disrupt systemic and reproductive physiology [73].
Heat stress disrupts the intestinal barrier, resulting in translocation of microbial products such as LPS, peptidoglycans, and short-chain fatty acids into systemic circulation [68,74,75]. These signals trigger a cascade of inflammatory and endocrine responses that affect distant organs, including the ovary. Collectively, this sequence can be conceptualized as a gut–systemic–ovarian axis, in which intestinal dysregulation under heat stress drives systemic inflammation, hormonal perturbations, and ultimately ovarian dysfunction [76]. Recognition of this axis provides a framework for integrating gastrointestinal, systemic, and ovarian mechanisms within a single conceptual model of HS-induced reproductive impairment.

2.3. Silent Signals: How LPS Disrupts Ovarian Function

Building on gut-derived systemic stressors, heat stress also affects metabolic and endocrine parameters, which collectively influence ovarian signaling and follicle survival. LPS activates the immune system primarily through the TLR4 pathway, inducing proinflammatory cytokine production and oxidative stress [77]. Ovarian tissue is directly responsive to systemic endotoxins; bovine ovarian cortical strips enriched in primordial follicles had increased atresia and fewer follicles after LPS exposure in vitro [78]. These effects are TLR4-dependent, as TLR4-deficient mice resist LPS-induced follicle depletion, confirming that the ovary is a target of circulating microbial products.
Lipopolysaccharide alters reproductive endocrine function by reducing follicular fluid estradiol concentrations [79], suppressing pituitary luteinizing hormone release [80], modulating granulosa cell steroidogenic capacity [81], and increasing ovarian TLR4 protein abundance [73,81]. Chronic low-level LPS exposure in post-pubertal, estrus-synchronized pigs increases circulating insulin, elevates LPS-binding protein, and raises serum E2 and glucose concentrations, while simultaneously upregulating ovarian TLR4 [73,81]. Notably, these systemic and ovarian effects occur without fever, highlighting the subtle yet significant endocrine and reproductive consequences of metabolic endotoxemia.
Although LPS has been widely used as a model for metabolic endotoxemia, intestinal barrier dysfunction during heat stress likely permits translocation of a broader spectrum of microbial and metabolic products. Components derived from Gram-positive bacteria, including peptidoglycans and lipoteichoic acids, can activate innate immune signaling through pattern recognition receptors such as TLR2, potentially contributing to inflammatory responses within reproductive tissues [82,83,84]. In addition, microbial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids—including acetate, propionate, and butyrate—may influence ovarian physiology through systemic metabolic and epigenetic mechanisms. While SCFAs generally support intestinal barrier integrity and metabolic homeostasis under normal conditions, dysregulated concentrations or altered microbial composition during heat stress may modify endocrine signaling and immune responses relevant to ovarian function [85,86]. Other microbial-associated molecules, including bacterial DNA fragments and secondary bile acid metabolites, may also enter circulation during intestinal hyperpermeability and interact with immune and metabolic pathways. Consequently, reproductive effects attributed solely to LPS likely represent only part of a complex network of gut-derived signals influencing ovarian physiology during heat stress [87].

2.4. Lifelong Reproductive Risks of Heat Stress and Gut Dysfunction

The reproductive impact of intestinal hyperpermeability varies across species and developmental stages. In prepubertal pigs, heat stress alters the serum metabolome, including reductions in aminomalonic acid and campesterol, indicating disruptions in oxidative stress–related metabolism and sterol homeostasis [56]. Amino acid perturbations also occur in cumulus-oocyte complexes under HS, compromising oocyte competence and developmental potential [58,59]. Therefore, immature females are particularly sensitive to HS-induced gut-derived endotoxemia, which may delay puberty onset and compromise ovarian reserve.
In utero exposure to maternal HS reduces placental efficiency and fetal growth, partially through gut barrier-mediated inflammatory mechanisms [36]. Postnatally, offspring exposed to in utero heat stress often exhibit elevated core body temperature, altered metabolic profiles, and changes in body composition [35,88], suggesting that prenatal heat stress can have lasting developmental and physiological consequences.

3. Gut-Endocrine Crosstalk in Heat Stress

HS-induced intestinal hyperpermeability intersects with multiple endocrine pathways critical for reproductive function. The preoptic region of the anterior hypothalamus regulates core temperature and integrates estrogenic inputs, influencing both thermoregulation and reproductive cyclicity [89,90,91,92]. Estradiol increases firing of heat-sensitive neurons [93], suggesting that HS-induced endocrine disruption may exacerbate hyperthermia while simultaneously impacting ovarian feedback mechanisms.

3.1. Heat Stress-Induced Insulin Effects on Ovarian Function

Reduced feed intake under HS is an adaptive response to lower the thermic cost of digestion, yet paradoxically, circulating insulin is elevated [11,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104]. Both basal insulin and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion are increased relative to thermal-neutral controls, implying that hyperinsulinemia is independent of caloric intake. Insulin regulates ovarian follicular growth, steroidogenesis, and oocyte energy metabolism [105,106], and chronic hyperinsulinemia is associated with reduced fecundity and fertility [107]. Mechanistically, insulin amplifies ovarian steroidogenic enzyme activity and influences granulosa and theca cell proliferation; however, excessive insulin may also contribute to luteal dysfunction under HS.

3.2. Heat Stress-Induced Prolactin Effects on Ovarian Function

Prolactin (PRL), secreted by anterior pituitary lactotrophs [108], is consistently elevated during HS in pigs, cows, and other mammals [11,109,110,111,112,113]. PRL is involved in thermoregulation, osmotic fluid balance, sweat production, and potentially heat shock protein induction [114,115,116]. Elevated PRL influences ovarian function by stimulating E2 and progesterone (P4) production, regulating luteal immune cell populations, and modulating ovarian follicular development [117,118]. Hyperprolactinemia causes infertility, amenorrhea, and reduced gonadotropin responsiveness [119,120]. Female Prl−/− mice are infertile, with irregular cyclicity, increased luteal cell death, and reduced P4 production [121,122,123]. Prolactin receptor (PRLR) gene variants in pigs influence thermotolerance, with long and short isoforms modulating JAK/STAT, Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), and PI3K signaling [124,125,126,127]. Clearly, HS-induced hyperprolactinemia contributes to reproductive compromise.

3.3. Luteal Vulnerability and Progesterone Under Heat Stress

The CL is the primary P4 source in pigs, essential for conceptus implantation and pregnancy maintenance [128,129,130]. HS reduces CL weight, possibly due to cellular apoptosis or altered luteal composition, while P4 output per unit tissue may paradoxically increase, reflecting compensatory steroidogenesis [131]. LPS and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) α disrupt luteal function and induce prostaglandin F2 (PGF2) α, contributing to early embryonic loss [132,133,134]. However, exogenous P4 restores CL weight and supports pregnancy under HS, offering a potential mitigation strategy.

3.4. Gut-Endocrine-Ovarian Axis: A Network Under Heat Stress

Intestinal hyperpermeability, metabolic endotoxemia, insulin hypersecretion, hyperprolactinemia, and CL dysfunction are interlinked. LPS stimulates PRL release [135], PRL promotes pancreatic beta-cell proliferation and insulin secretion [136,137], and extra-pituitary PRL enhances inflammatory signaling [21,138]. PRL also modulates LPS-induced TLR4/Nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) signaling [139,140]. Thus, gut-derived endotoxemia is tightly integrated with endocrine and metabolic responses, ultimately influencing ovarian function, follicular development, steroidogenesis, and reproductive success during HS (Figure 2). This proposed sequence linking vascular redistribution, intestinal barrier disruption, endotoxemia, and ovarian molecular responses is conceptually illustrated in Figure 2.

3.5. Heat Stress-Induced Oxidative and Inflammatory Challenges to Fertility

Heat stress-induced intestinal hyperpermeability and endotoxemia elevate systemic oxidative stress. Ischemia in enterocytes generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can circulate and affect ovarian tissue [64]. ROS impairs oocyte quality, reduces granulosa cell viability, and disrupts steroidogenesis, while proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNFα, IL-1β) induced by LPS further compromise luteal and follicular function [141,142,143,144,145]. Together, oxidative and inflammatory stress represents a central mechanism linking intestinal barrier dysfunction to reduced fertility [142,143,144,145,146].
In summary, HS-induced intestinal hyperpermeability, low-grade endotoxemia, endocrine disruption, and systemic inflammation form a mechanistic network that impairs female reproduction across species. These processes affect ovarian reserve, folliculogenesis, luteal function, steroidogenesis, and metabolic homeostasis, with implications for fertility and pregnancy outcomes. Integrating gut, endocrine, and ovarian responses is critical to understanding and mitigating HS-induced reproductive dysfunction.
A remaining challenge in understanding heat stress-induced reproductive dysfunction is defining the temporal sequence linking systemic physiological disturbances with ovarian molecular responses. Based on currently available evidence, a hypothetical progression can be proposed. In the early phase, elevated environmental temperature triggers thermoregulatory vascular redistribution, increasing peripheral blood flow to facilitate heat dissipation while reducing perfusion of visceral organs, including the gastrointestinal tract. In Stage 1, vascular redistribution likely occurs within hours of heat exposure. Reduced intestinal perfusion then promotes enterocyte hypoxia and epithelial barrier disruption (Stage 2), resulting in increased intestinal permeability (“leaky gut”) [68,84,101]. Subsequent translocation of bacterial products such as lipopolysaccharide into the circulation leads to Stage 3: low-grade metabolic endotoxemia, accompanied by systemic inflammatory signaling, endocrine perturbations, and oxidative stress [147,148]. These systemic alterations ultimately converge on the ovary, where Stage 4 occurs: ovarian molecular remodeling becomes evident through activation of signaling pathways including TLR4/NF-κB, insulin/PI3K/AKT, and JAK–STAT, as well as altered steroidogenesis, heat shock protein expression, and cell death pathways [149,150,151,152,153]. Although the precise timing of these stages likely varies with heat intensity, duration, and physiological state, this conceptual sequence provides a testable framework linking systemic heat stress responses to ovarian dysfunction and may guide future chronobiological investigations of heat stress–induced infertility.

4. Heat Stress and the Molecular Machinery of the Ovary

HS not only alters systemic physiology but also profoundly affects intracellular signaling within the ovary. These molecular disruptions are linked to hyperinsulinemia, PRL elevation, and metabolic endotoxemia in vivo, ultimately impairing follicle development, steroidogenesis, and oocyte competence. Key pathways affected by HS include insulin/PI3K signaling, LPS/TLR4 inflammatory pathways, steroidogenesis, JAK–STAT signaling, heat shock protein expression, autophagy, apoptosis, and other cell death processes [154]. Collectively, these alterations form a molecular network that underlies reproductive dysfunction in heat-stressed females (Figure 3).

4.1. Ovarian Insulin Signaling and PI3K/AKT Pathway Under Heat Stress

The ovary expresses insulin receptors (IRs), heterotetrameric proteins composed of two extracellular α-subunits and two transmembrane β-subunits [73,155,156]. Binding of insulin to the α-subunits activates the β-subunit tyrosine kinase, triggering autophosphorylation and recruitment of insulin receptor substrates (IRS1–4). Disruptions in IRS1 or IRS2 are associated with infertility, highlighting the critical role of insulin signaling in ovarian function [105,157,158]. In postpubertal, estrus-synchronized pigs, heat stress during the follicular phase increases ovarian IR abundance, demonstrating that hyperinsulinemia potentiates ovarian insulin signaling [159]. Similarly, prepubertal heat-stressed pigs show elevated IRS1 mRNA and phosphorylated IRS1^Tyr632, confirming enhanced insulin-mediated signaling in the ovary [160].
A key downstream effector of insulin signaling is PI3K, which regulates primordial follicle survival and activation [20,160,161,162,163,164]. PI3K activation leads to phosphorylation of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate to phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate, recruiting lipid-binding proteins such as AKT to the plasma membrane [165,166,167]. AKT phosphorylates Forkhead Box O3 (FOXO3), a transcription factor that regulates oocyte cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [168,169,170,171]. Phosphorylated FOXO3 translocates from the nucleus, permitting follicle activation and growth. HS increases ovarian AKT1 and FOXO3 mRNA, as well as pAKT1 protein, indicating enhanced PI3K/AKT signaling under heat load [105,157]. However, elevated FOXO3 activity may inhibit primordial follicle activation, potentially reducing ovarian reserve and impairing fertility [172,173,174].

4.2. Ovarian TLR4/NF-κB Signaling in Response to Heat Stress

Heat stress-induced intestinal hyperpermeability facilitates translocation of LPS into the systemic circulation [71,72]. In pigs exposed to cyclical HS, ovarian TLR4 protein abundance increases, indicating ovarian responsiveness to endotoxemia [73]. TLR4 activation triggers a signaling cascade culminating in NFκB activation via phosphorylation of RELA and nuclear translocation [175,176]. Activated NFκB upregulates proinflammatory cytokines, including TNFα and IL-1β, which impair follicle survival and oocyte competence [81,177,178,179].
Heat-stressed post-pubertal females exhibit increased ovarian pRELA, supporting the concept that the ovary responds directly to systemic endotoxemia. These findings link HS-induced intestinal barrier dysfunction to local ovarian inflammation and provide a molecular mechanism for follicular atresia observed during heat episodes.
Direct evidence from both in vivo and in vitro studies demonstrates that heat stress modulates PI3K/AKT signaling in ovarian granulosa cells. In vitro experiments using heat-stressed porcine granulosa cells show decreased phosphorylation of AKT and downstream targets, correlating with impaired steroidogenesis and increased apoptotic susceptibility [180,181]. Complementary in vivo studies in heat-stressed sows confirm similar disruptions in PI3K/AKT activity, highlighting this pathway’s central role in regulating follicular survival and ovarian function during thermal stress [20,151]. Mechanistically, TLR4/NF-κB-mediated inflammatory signaling can negatively influence PI3K/AKT activity, linking systemic endotoxemia to suppression of pro-survival pathways in ovarian follicles [149]. These findings provide mechanistic support for the contribution of PI3K/AKT pathway alterations to heat stress-induced reproductive dysfunction.

4.3. Impact of Heat Stress on Ovarian Steroidogenesis

Ovarian steroidogenesis is acutely sensitive to HS. In granulosa cells from mice, HS reduces E2 and P4 along with decreased expression of steroidogenic enzymes [182]. Conversely, in pre-pubertal heat-stressed pigs, Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory protein (STAR) and cytochrome P450 family 19 subfamily A member 1 (CYP19A1) mRNA are increased, suggesting compensatory attempts to maintain steroid production under heat load [21]. STAR mediates cholesterol transport into mitochondria, initiating steroid synthesis, while CYP19A1 catalyzes the final step in E2 production.
Interestingly, in luteal tissue of pigs exposed to HS, STAR, 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, and PGF2α receptor abundance were unchanged despite increased P4 per mg of CL tissue [131], indicating that HS may enhance steroidogenic efficiency to counter reduced luteal mass. These findings emphasize nuanced effects of HS on ovarian steroidogenesis.

4.4. Prolactin-Mediated Ovarian JAK–STAT Activation Under Heat Stress

PRL-mediated JAK–STAT signaling is a critical ovarian pathway affected by HS. Heat-stressed pigs exhibit increased pSTAT5α/β^Tyr694/699 during the follicular phase and elevated STAT3 in the luteal phase [183]. These molecular changes reflect systemic hyperprolactinemia and indicate direct modulation of ovarian signaling, potentially impacting granulosa cell proliferation, luteal function, and steroidogenesis.

4.5. Heat Shock Proteins in the Ovarian Heat Stress Response

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) act as molecular chaperones, assisting in protein folding, mitochondrial function, and stress response [184,185]. Constitutive HSPs maintain basal protein homeostasis, whereas inducible HSPs respond to HS, oxidative stress, and inflammatory stimuli. In pigs, HSPA1A (HSP70) and HSPE1 (HSP10) increase in response to HS, particularly in granulosa cells and oocytes [186,187]. HSPH1 has bidirectional regulation, depending on thermal and nutritional conditions [183,188]. These chaperones protect ovarian cells from protein misfolding and mitochondrial dysfunction induced by thermal and oxidative stress.

5. Heat Stress-Induced Modulation of Ovarian Cell Death Pathways

HS alters ovarian cell homeostasis by modulating autophagy and apoptosis, critical processes for removing damaged cellular components [189]. Morphological changes such as vacuolization occur in both oocytes and granulosa cells under HS [180]. Furthermore, HS increases protein abundance of Beclin 1 (BECN1) and Light Chain 3 Beta (LC3B)-II while decreasing ATG12 in ovarian cells, suggesting a dysregulated autophagic response [181].
Throughout the literature, it is critical to distinguish between in vitro and in vivo findings, as the experimental context can influence observed responses. For example, in vitro studies using isolated porcine granulosa cells [22,190] reveal direct effects of heat stress on steroidogenesis and intracellular signaling, whereas in vivo studies in heat-stressed sows [22,190] capture the integrated response of ovarian tissue under systemic physiological challenges. Notably, many intracellular pathways disrupted by heat stress—including PI3K/AKT, JAK–STAT, TLR4-mediated inflammatory cascades, and oxidative stress–mediated responses—show conserved alterations across these experimental systems, supporting their relevance to reproductive impairment [20,149,151,183].
In prophase I-arrested oocytes, phosphorylated B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) and BCL2L1 are elevated under HS, indicating altered apoptosis regulation [168]. In cultured pig oocytes, HS increases the Autophagy-related protein (ATG) 12–ATG5 complex and accelerates LC3B-II turnover, further demonstrating modifications to autophagic machinery [181]. Collectively, these alterations highlight that HS disrupts the balance between autophagy and apoptosis, potentially compromising follicle quality and oocyte survival.
It should be noted that besides autophagy and apoptosis, heat stress affects healthy follicular development through other regulated cell death mechanisms, including necroptosis, pyroptosis, and parthanatos, particularly in response to physiological stressors such as oxidative stress [191,192,193]. Heat stress disrupts follicular health not only by inducing apoptosis and autophagy but also by causing oxidative stress, damaging mitochondrial function, and altering steroidogenesis (significantly reducing estradiol). Together, these mechanisms lead to accelerated follicular atresia, impaired oocyte maturation, and reduced granulosa cell proliferation [191,192,193].

6. Proteomic Remodeling and Integrated Ovarian Signaling Networks of the Ovary Under Heat Stress

6.1. Proteomic Remodeling

HS induces broad proteomic changes in ovarian tissue. Transcriptional profiling of cumulus–oocyte complexes in pigs identified altered mRNAs linked to HSP response and extracellular matrix organization [194]. An untargeted Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) proteomic analysis in pre-pubertal gilts revealed 178 proteins affected by HS, including 76 upregulated and 102 downregulated proteins [184,186,188]. Notably, 79 proteins were consistently altered across multiple thermal and nutritional comparisons.
HS reduces hypoxia upregulated protein 1 (HYOU1), indicating ovarian hypoxia, consistent with reduced blood flow during HS. Proteins related to oxidative stress, peroxiredoxin, thioredoxin-like 1, and glutathione S-transferase, were altered, supporting the notion that HS induces oxidative damage [195,196,197]. Immune-responsive proteins were also affected, including increased complement C2, C8 alpha chain, Galectin-10, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein L-like, and decreased Ficolin-2, reflecting immune activation within the ovary [184,186,198].
Proteins involved in chaperoning, extracellular matrix remodeling, metabolism, and signaling were also altered, providing a molecular basis for systemic reproductive consequences observed during HS. HSP family members HSPA1A, HSPE1, and HSPH1 mirrored targeted studies, emphasizing their central role in protecting ovarian function under thermal stress [186,199].

6.2. Integrated Ovarian Signaling Networks Under Heat Stress

Collectively, HS orchestrates a multifaceted network of intracellular ovarian signaling disruptions. Enhanced insulin/PI3K/AKT signaling influences follicle activation and oocyte growth, while LPS/TLR4 and JAK–STAT pathways mediate inflammatory and endocrine signals [20,149,151,183]. Heat shock proteins mitigate protein misfolding and mitochondrial stress, while autophagy/apoptosis pathways regulate removal of damaged cellular components. Proteomic changes highlight oxidative stress, immune activation, and extracellular matrix remodeling as additional mechanisms of ovarian dysfunction.
These molecular perturbations, in combination with systemic alterations (hyperinsulinemia, hyperprolactinemia, and endotoxemia), provide a mechanistic framework explaining HS-induced reductions in follicle quality, steroidogenesis, oocyte competence, and early embryonic survival. Across species and developmental stages, these pathways appear highly conserved, underscoring their importance as potential targets for interventions to improve reproductive outcomes under thermal stress.

7. Future Directions for Mitigating Heat Stress-Induced Reproductive Dysfunction

HS represents a multifactorial challenge to female fertility, and future research should aim to unravel the temporal and mechanistic sequences of systemic and ovarian responses. Integrity of the intestinal barrier under HS is critical. Although LPS has been widely used to model endotoxemia, the intestine contains a complex milieu of bacterial products and metabolites that may differently influence ovarian signaling. Systematic evaluation of additional microbial and metabolic constituents in heat-stressed females is therefore warranted to better understand the interplay between gut-derived signals and reproductive dysfunction. Complementary to intestinal health, altered blood flow during HS may reduce ovarian delivery of nutrients and hormones, directly impairing follicle development and steroidogenesis [200]. Future studies employing non-invasive imaging or flow-sensitive biomarkers could clarify the extent to which vascular redistribution contributes to reproductive deficits.
Nutritional interventions aimed at sustaining feed intake or supporting metabolic balance during heat episodes may also hold promise; however, these approaches require careful optimization to avoid inducing additional metabolic stress. For example, excessive energy supplementation may overstimulate insulin signaling pathways, leading to hyperinsulinemia and altered metabolic partitioning that could disrupt ovarian endocrine regulation. Similarly, nutritional strategies that strongly stimulate anabolic pathways may alter the dynamics of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system, potentially affecting follicular growth, steroidogenesis, and luteal function [21]. Imbalances in these metabolic regulators may exacerbate endocrine dysregulation rather than improve reproductive outcomes. Therefore, nutritional interventions designed to mitigate HS should aim to support metabolic homeostasis while avoiding excessive activation of insulin- or IGF-mediated pathways. Future studies integrating metabolic, endocrine, and reproductive parameters will be essential to define optimal dietary strategies that preserve ovarian function under conditions of thermal stress.
At the molecular level, ovarian responses to HS include insulin/PI3K signaling, LPS/TLR4-mediated inflammation, JAK–STAT signaling, oxidative stress, and autophagy/apoptosis pathways [180,181,183,189]. Understanding the temporal dynamics and tissue-specific interactions among these pathways could reveal intervention windows for pharmacological, nutritional, or environmental mitigation. Importantly, any strategy must balance reproductive preservation with overall animal health, given that the systemic HS response prioritizes survival. Extending these investigations across species and developmental stages will improve translational relevance and may identify conserved mechanisms of HS resilience in female reproduction. Ultimately, integrative studies combining systemic physiology, ovarian molecular biology, and targeted interventions will be critical to reduce HS-induced infertility.

8. Conclusions

HS imposes profound effects on female reproductive physiology, resulting in infertility through both systemic and ovarian-specific mechanisms. Systemic alterations, including intestinal barrier dysfunction, hyperinsulinemia, hyperprolactinemia, and vascular redistribution, create a cascade of stressors that impact ovarian signaling pathways. Within the ovary, HS modulates insulin/PI3K signaling, steroidogenesis, LPS/TLR4-mediated inflammation, JAK–STAT activation, oxidative stress, and cell death pathways, including autophagy and apoptosis. Heat shock proteins provide partial protection; however, cumulative molecular disruptions impair follicle survival, oocyte quality, and hormonal balance. Experimental findings in porcine models provide a detailed framework linking systemic and local ovarian responses; however, gaps remain regarding species-specific variations and developmental stage-dependent sensitivity to HS. Potential mitigation strategies, such as improving intestinal integrity, sustaining nutrient intake, modulating endocrine responses, or targeting molecular stress pathways, require rigorous evaluation to ensure they do not compromise overall animal health. Importantly, identifying the temporal sequence of physiological and molecular events is essential to determine the primary drivers of HS-induced infertility and to target interventions effectively. Beyond its importance for livestock productivity, the porcine model provides a valuable translational framework for understanding the broader biological consequences of heat stress on ovarian physiology. Due to similarities between pigs and humans in ovarian morphology, follicular development patterns, and endocrine regulation, mechanistic insights gained from porcine studies may inform general mammalian reproductive biology. Notably, cellular pathways implicated in heat stress-induced ovarian dysfunction—such as PI3K/AKT signaling, JAK–STAT activation, inflammatory responses, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress pathways—are conserved across species. Therefore, studies in pigs contribute not only to improving reproductive efficiency in livestock but also to advancing our understanding of conserved mechanisms through which environmental stressors impair ovarian function. Overall, the current body of evidence highlights that reproductive dysfunction under HS is multifactorial, arising from the integration of systemic, cellular, and molecular perturbations. Future work focused on bridging these scales, linking systemic physiological responses with ovarian-specific molecular pathways, will be critical for developing targeted strategies to preserve fertility in heat-stressed females and may also provide insights relevant across mammalian species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.K.; investigation, R.K.; resources, R.K.; writing—original draft preparation, R.K.; writing—review and editing, R.K., J.C.P.F. and J.P.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge their respective institution for their support. All schematic illustrations presented in this review were created and optimized using the FigureLabs platform (Nano Banana2) for scientific visualization.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Costello, A.; Abbas, M.; Allen, A.; Ball, S.; Bell, S.; Bellamy, R.; Friel, S.; Groce, N.; Johnson, A.; Kett, M.; et al. Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. Lancet 2009, 373, 1693–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ebi, K.L.; Capon, A.; Berry, P.; Broderick, C.; de Dear, R.; Havenith, G.; Honda, Y.; Kovats, R.S.; Ma, W.; Malik, A.; et al. Hot weather and heat extremes: Health risks. Lancet 2021, 398, 698–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Papalexiou, S.M.; AghaKouchak, A.; Trenberth, K.E.; Foufoula-Georgiou, E. Global, regional, and megacity trends in the highest temperature of the year: Diagnostics and evidence for accelerating trends. Earth’s Future 2018, 6, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Thornton, P.K.; Ericksen, P.J.; Herrero, M.; Challinor, A.J. Climate variability and vulnerability to climate change: A review. Glob. Change Biol. 2014, 20, 3313–3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. McMichael, A.J.; Kovats, R.S. Climate change and climate variability: Adaptations to reduce adverse health impacts. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2000, 61, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Robine, J.-M.; Cheung, S.L.K.; Le Roy, S.; Van Oyen, H.; Griffiths, C.; Michel, J.-P.; Herrmann, F.R. Death toll exceeded 70,000 in Europe during the summer of 2003. Comptes Rendus Biol. 2008, 331, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kovats, R.S.; Kristie, L.E. Heatwaves and public health in Europe. Eur. J. Public Health 2006, 16, 592–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Memon, R.A.; Leung, D.Y.C.; Liu, C. A review on the generation, determination and mitigation of urban heat island. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Adams, Q.H.; Chan, E.M.G.; Spangler, K.R.; Weinberger, K.R.; Lane, K.J.; Errett, N.A.; Hess, J.J.; Sun, Y.; Wellenius, G.A.; Nori-Sarma, A. Examining the optimal placement of cooling centers to serve populations at high risk of extreme heat exposure in 81 US cities. Public Health Rep. 2023, 138, 955–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bernabucci, U.; Lacetera, N.; Baumgard, L.H.; Rhoads, R.P.; Ronchi, B.; Nardone, A. Metabolic and hormonal acclimation to heat stress in domesticated ruminants. Animal 2010, 4, 1167–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Prates, J.A.M. Heat stress effects on animal health and performance in monogastric livestock: Physiological responses, molecular mechanisms, and management interventions. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Love, R.J. Definition of a seasonal infertility problem in pigs. Vet. Rec. 1978, 103, 443–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Love, R.J.; Evans, G.; Klupiec, C. Seasonal effects on fertility in gilts and sows. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 1993, 48, 191–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xue, J.L.; Dial, G.D.; Marsh, W.E.; Davies, P.R. Multiple manifestations of season on reproductive performance of commercial swine. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1994, 204, 1486–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Costermans, N.G.J.; Teerds, K.J.; Middelkoop, A.; Roelen, B.A.J.; Schoevers, E.J.; van Tol, H.T.A.; Laurenssen, B.; Koopmanschap, R.E.; Zhao, Y.; Blokland, M.; et al. Consequences of negative energy balance on follicular development and oocyte quality in primiparous sows. Biol. Reprod. 2020, 102, 388–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jongbo, A.O.; de Borba, L.P.; Pereira, R.M.M.; Bello, Q.O.; Gregoratto, L.L.; de Souza, D.P.; Adeyeye, O.A.; Vieira, F.M.C. Heat stress in livestock under tropical climates: Impacts and mitigation strategies. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2026, 58, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nascimento, D.R.; Azevedo, V.A.N.; Ribeiro, R.P.; Ximenes, G.d.O.; Silva, A.d.A.; Barbalho, E.C.; Barrozo, L.G.; Chaves, S.C.; Castro, M.S.M.; Marcelino, E.C.; et al. Reproductive challenges in ruminants under heat stress: A review of follicular, oocyte, and embryonic responses. Animals 2025, 15, 2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lunney, J.K.; Van Goor, A.; Walker, K.E.; Hailstock, T.; Franklin, J.; Dai, C. Importance of the pig as a human biomedical model. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021, 13, eabd5758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bergen, W.G. Pigs (Sus scrofa) in biomedical research. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition and Metabolism; Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 1354, pp. 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jagarlamudi, K.; Liu, L.; Adhikari, D.; Reddy, P.; Idahl, A.; Ottander, U.; Lundin, E.; Liu, K. Oocyte-specific deletion of Pten in mice reveals a stage-specific function of PTEN/PI3K signaling in oocytes in controlling follicular activation. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nteeba, J.; Sanz-Fernandez, M.V.; Rhoads, R.P.; Baumgard, L.H.; Ross, J.W.; Keating, A.F. Heat stress alters ovarian insulin-mediated phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase and steroidogenic signaling in gilt ovaries. Biol. Reprod. 2015, 92, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sammad, A.; Luo, H.; Hu, L.; Zhu, H.; Wang, Y. Transcriptome reveals granulosa cells coping through redox, inflammatory and metabolic mechanisms under acute heat stress. Cells 2022, 11, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bei, M.; Wang, Q.; Yu, W.; Han, L.; Yu, J. Effects of heat stress on ovarian development and the expression of HSP genes in mice. J. Therm. Biol. 2020, 89, 102532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Roth, Z.; Meidan, R.; Shaham-Albalancy, A.; Braw-Tal, R.; Wolfenson, D. Delayed effect of heat stress on steroid production in medium-sized and preovulatory bovine follicles. Reproduction 2001, 121, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  25. Bridges, P.J.; Brusie, M.A.; Fortune, J.E. Elevated temperature (heat stress) in vitro reduces androstenedione and estradiol and increases progesterone secretion by follicular cells from bovine dominant follicles. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2005, 29, 508–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zeron, Y.; Ocheretny, A.; Kedar, O.; Borochov, A.; Sklan, D.; Arav, A. Seasonal changes in bovine fertility: Relation to developmental competence of oocytes, membrane properties and fatty acid composition of follicles. Reproduction 2001, 121, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  27. Al-Katanani, Y.M.; Paula-Lopes, F.F.; Hansen, P.J. Effect of season and exposure to heat stress on oocyte competence in Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85, 390–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Al-Katanani, Y.M.; Webb, D.W.; Hansen, P.J. Factors affecting seasonal variation in 90-day nonreturn rate to first service in lactating Holstein cows in a hot climate. J. Dairy Sci. 1999, 82, 2611–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Roth, Z. Heat stress reduces maturation and developmental capacity in bovine oocytes. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2021, 33, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ealy, A.D.; Drost, M.; Hansen, P.J. Developmental changes in embryonic resistance to adverse effects of maternal heat stress in cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1993, 76, 2899–2905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Edwards, J.L.; Hansen, P.J. Differential responses of bovine oocytes and preimplantation embryos to heat shock. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 1997, 46, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Collier, R.J.; Beede, D.K.; Thatcher, W.W.; Israel, L.A.; Wilcox, C.J. Influences of environment and its modification on dairy animal health and production. J. Dairy Sci. 1982, 65, 2213–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wolfenson, D.; Flamenbaum, I.; Berman, A. Dry period heat stress relief effects on prepartum progesterone, calf birth weight, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 1988, 71, 809–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Thureen, P.J.; Trembler, K.A.; Meschia, G.; Makowski, E.L.; Wilkening, R.B. Placental glucose transport in heat-induced fetal growth retardation. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 1992, 263, R578–R585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Johnson, J.S.; Boddicker, R.L.; Sanz-Fernandez, M.V.; Ross, J.W.; Selsby, J.T.; Lucy, M.C.; Safranski, T.J.; Rhoads, R.P.; Baumgard, L.H. Effects of mammalian in utero heat stress on adolescent body temperature. Int. J. Hyperth. 2013, 29, 696–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Johnson, J.S.; Sanz Fernandez, M.V.; Gutierrez, N.A.; Patience, J.F.; Ross, J.W.; Gabler, N.K.; Lucy, M.C.; Safranski, T.J.; Rhoads, R.P.; Baumgard, L.H. Effects of in utero heat stress on postnatal body composition in pigs: I. Growing phase. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Akbarinejad, V.; Gharagozlou, F.; Vojgani, M. Temporal effect of maternal heat stress during gestation on the fertility and anti-Müllerian hormone concentration of offspring in bovine. Theriogenology 2017, 99, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gaskins, A.J.; Mínguez-Alarcón, L.; VoPham, T.; Hart, J.E.; Chavarro, J.E.; Schwartz, J.; Souter, I.; Laden, F. Impact of ambient temperature on ovarian reserve. Fertil. Steril. 2021, 116, 1052–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nyadanu, S.D.; Tessema, G.A.; Mullins, B.; Pereira, G. Maternal acute thermophysiological stress and stillbirth in Western Australia, 2000–2015: A space-time-stratified case-crossover analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 836, 155750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yanovich, R.; Ketko, I.; Muginshtein-Simkovitch, J.; Yanovich, E.; Eliyahu, U.; Fleischmann, C.; Atias-Varon, D.; Waissengrin, B.; Makranz, C.; Heled, Y. Physiological differences between heat-tolerant and heat-intolerant young healthy women. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 2019, 90, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rekha, S.; Nalini, S.J.; Bhuvana, S.; Kanmani, S.; Hirst, J.E.; Venugopal, V. Heat stress and adverse pregnancy outcome: Prospective cohort study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2024, 131, 612–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mao, Y.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Yue, Y.; Ruan, T.; Yang, Y.; Xiong, T. Associations between extreme temperature exposure and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertens. Pregnancy 2023, 42, 2288586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gordon, M.; Casey, J.A.; McBrien, H.; Gemmill, A.; Hernández, D.; Catalano, R.; Chakrabarti, S.; Bruckner, T. Disparities in preterm birth following the July 1995 Chicago heat wave. Ann. Epidemiol. 2023, 87, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Were, J.M.; Stranges, S.; Creed, I.F. Fertility is a key predictor of the double burden of malnutrition among women of child-bearing age in sub-Saharan Africa. J. Glob. Health 2020, 10, 020423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Salem, A.M. Variation of leptin during menstrual cycle and its relation to the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis: A systematic review. Int. J. Womens Health 2021, 13, 445–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sun, J.; Shen, X.; Liu, H.; Lu, S.; Peng, J.; Kuang, H. Caloric restriction in female reproduction: Is it beneficial or detrimental? Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2021, 19, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Garcia, D.N.; Saccon, T.D.; Pradiee, J.; Rincón, J.A.A.; Andrade, K.R.S.; Rovani, M.T.; Mondadori, R.G.; Cruz, L.A.X.; Barros, C.C.; Masternak, M.M.; et al. Effect of caloric restriction and rapamycin on ovarian aging in mice. GeroScience 2019, 41, 395–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zanini, B.M.; Andrade, K.R.S.; Pradiee, J.; Veiga, G.B.; Garcia, D.N.; Mondadori, R.G.; Cruz, L.A.X.; Alvarado-Rincón, J.A.; Ramirez, R.P.; Saccon, T.D.; et al. Calorie restriction during gestation affects ovarian reserve in offspring in the mouse. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2020, 32, 1338–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Athar, F.; Karmani, M.; Templeman, N.M. Metabolic hormones are integral regulators of female reproductive health and function. Biosci. Rep. 2024, 44, BSR20231916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Muñoz, M.T.; Argente, J. Anorexia nervosa in female adolescents: Endocrine and bone mineral density disturbances. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2002, 147, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Muñoz-Calvo, M.T.; Argente, J. Nutritional and pubertal disorders. Endocr. Dev. 2016, 29, 153–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Byrne, C.J.; Fair, S.; English, A.M.; Cirot, M.; Staub, C.; Lonergan, P.; Kenny, D.A. Plane of nutrition before and after 6 months of age in Holstein–Friesian bulls: I. Effects on performance, body composition, age at puberty, and postpubertal semen production. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 3447–3459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Heslin, J.; Kenny, D.A.; Kelly, A.K.; McGee, M. Age at puberty and pregnancy rate in beef heifer genotypes with contrasting nutritional intake from 8 to 13 months of age. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2020, 212, 106221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bruinjé, T.C.; Rosadiuk, J.P.; Moslemipur, F.; Sauerwein, H.; Steele, M.A.; Ambrose, D.J. Differing planes of pre- and postweaning phase nutrition in Holstein heifers: II. Effects on circulating leptin, luteinizing hormone, and age at puberty. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 1153–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rhoads, M.L.; Rhoads, R.P.; VanBaale, M.J.; Collier, R.J.; Sanders, S.R.; Weber, W.J.; Crooker, B.A.; Baumgard, L.H. Effects of heat stress and plane of nutrition on lactating Holstein cows: I. Production, metabolism, and aspects of circulating somatotropin. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 1986–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Roach, C.M.; Mayorga, E.J.; Baumgard, L.H.; Ross, J.W.; Keating, A.F. Phenotypic, endocrinological, and metabolic effects of zearalenone exposure and additive effect of heat stress in prepubertal female pigs. J. Therm. Biol. 2024, 119, 103742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Choudhary, S.P.; Tran, L.S. Phytosterols: Perspectives in human nutrition and clinical therapy. Curr. Med. Chem. 2011, 18, 4557–4567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Gross, P. Biologic activity of hydroxylamine: A review. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1985, 14, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kawano, K.; Sakaguchi, K.; Ninpetch, N.; Yanagawa, Y.; Katagiri, S. Physiological high temperatures alter the amino acid metabolism of bovine early antral follicles. J. Reprod. Dev. 2024, 70, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mzedawee, H.R.H.; Kowsar, R.; Moradi-Hajidavaloo, R.; Shiasi-Sardoabi, R.; Sadeghi, K.; Nasr-Esfahani, M.H.; Hajian, M. Heat shock interferes with the amino acid metabolism of bovine cumulus–oocyte complexes in vitro: A multistep analysis. Amino Acids 2024, 56, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rowell, L.B.; Brengelmann, G.L.; Blackmon, J.R.; Twiss, R.D.; Kusumi, F. Splanchnic blood flow and metabolism in heat-stressed man. J. Appl. Physiol. 1968, 24, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Deschamps, A.; Magder, S. Effects of heat stress on vascular capacitance. Am. J. Physiol. 1994, 266, H2122–H2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Mayorga, E.J.; Renaudeau, D.; Ramirez, B.C.; Ross, J.W.; Baumgard, L.H. Heat stress adaptations in pigs. Anim. Front. 2019, 9, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Glover, L.E.; Lee, J.S.; Colgan, S.P. Oxygen metabolism and barrier regulation in the intestinal mucosa. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 3680–3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Amar, J.; Burcelin, R.; Ruidavets, J.B.; Cani, P.D.; Fauvel, J.; Alessi, M.C.; Chamontin, B.; Ferrières, J. Energy intake is associated with endotoxemia in apparently healthy men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 87, 1219–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Al-Attas, O.S.; Al-Daghri, N.M.; Al-Rubeaan, K.; da Silva, N.F.; Sabico, S.L.; Kumar, S.; McTernan, P.G.; Harte, A.L. Changes in endotoxin levels in T2DM subjects on anti-diabetic therapies. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2009, 8, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hawkesworth, S.; Moore, S.E.; Fulford, A.J.; Barclay, G.R.; Darboe, A.A.; Mark, H.; Nyan, O.A.; Prentice, A.M. Evidence for metabolic endotoxemia in obese and diabetic Gambian women. Nutr. Diabetes 2013, 3, e83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lian, P.; Braber, S.; Garssen, J.; Wichers, H.J.; Folkerts, G.; Fink-Gremmels, J.; Varasteh, S. Beyond heat stress: Intestinal integrity disruption and mechanism-based intervention strategies. Nutrients 2020, 12, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Garcia, C.K.; Renteria, L.I.; Leite-Santos, G.; Leon, L.R.; Laitano, O. Exertional heat stroke: Pathophysiology and risk factors. BMJ Med. 2022, 1, e000239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rietschel, E.T.; Kirikae, T.; Schade, F.U.; Mamat, U.; Schmidt, G.; Loppnow, H.; Ulmer, A.J.; Zähringer, U.; Seydel, U.; Di Padova, F.; et al. Bacterial endotoxin: Molecular relationships of structure to activity and function. FASEB J. 1994, 8, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cani, P.D.; Amar, J.; Iglesias, M.A.; Poggi, M.; Knauf, C.; Bastelica, D.; Neyrinck, A.M.; Fava, F.; Tuohy, K.M.; Chabo, C.; et al. Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes 2007, 56, 1761–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Luche, E.; Cousin, B.; Garidou, L.; Serino, M.; Waget, A.; Barreau, C.; André, M.; Valet, P.; Courtney, M.; Casteilla, L.; et al. Metabolic endotoxemia directly increases the proliferation of adipocyte precursors at the onset of metabolic diseases through a CD14-dependent mechanism. Mol. Metab. 2013, 2, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Keating, A.F.; Ross, J.W.; Baumgard, L.H. Impact of real-life environmental exposures on reproduction: Systemic and ovarian impacts of heat stress in the porcine model. Reproduction 2024, 168, e240217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Koch, F.; Thom, U.; Albrecht, E.; Weikard, R.; Nolte, W.; Kuhla, B.; Kuehn, C. Heat stress directly impairs gut integrity and recruits distinct immune cell populations into the bovine intestine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 10333–10338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ghulam Mohyuddin, S.; Khan, I.; Zada, A.; Qamar, A.; Arbab, A.A.I.; Ma, X.B.; Yu, Z.C.; Liu, X.X.; Yong, Y.H.; Ju, X.H.; et al. Influence of heat stress on intestinal epithelial barrier function, tight junction protein, and immune and reproductive physiology. Biomed. Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 8547379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jin, J.; Yao, G.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, T.; Ye, H.; Zhou, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Qin, Z.; Chen, H.; et al. Gut virome dysbiosis contributes to premature ovarian insufficiency by modulating gut bacteriome. Gut Microbes 2026, 18, 2611645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Loppnow, H.; Brade, H.; Dürrbaum, I.; Dinarello, C.A.; Kusumoto, S.; Rietschel, E.T.; Flad, H.D. IL-1 induction capacity of defined lipopolysaccharide partial structures. J. Immunol. 1989, 142, 3229–3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bromfield, J.J.; Sheldon, I.M. Lipopolysaccharide reduces the primordial follicle pool in the bovine ovarian cortex ex vivo and in the murine ovary in vivo. Biol. Reprod. 2013, 88, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Magata, F.; Horiuchi, M.; Echizenya, R.; Miura, R.; Chiba, S.; Matsui, M.; Miyamoto, A.; Kobayashi, Y.; Shimizu, T. Lipopolysaccharide in ovarian follicular fluid influences the steroid production in large follicles of dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2014, 144, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Herman, A.P.; Romanowicz, K.; Tomaszewska-Zaremba, D. Effect of LPS on reproductive system at the level of the pituitary of anestrous ewes. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2010, 45, e351–e359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Herath, S.; Williams, E.J.; Lilly, S.T.; Gilbert, R.O.; Dobson, H.; Bryant, C.E.; Sheldon, I.M. Ovarian follicular cells have innate immune capabilities that modulate their endocrine function. Reproduction 2007, 134, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Patra, A.K.; Kar, I. Heat stress on microbiota composition, barrier integrity, and nutrient transport in gut, production performance, and its amelioration in farm animals. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2021, 63, 211–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Tang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Ji, Y. Heat stress-induced intestinal barrier impairment: Current insights into the aspects of oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 5438–5449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Lambert, G.P. Stress-induced gastrointestinal barrier dysfunction and its inflammatory effects. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. He, J.; Guo, H.; Zheng, W.; Xue, Y.; Zhao, R.; Yao, W. Heat stress affects fecal microbial and metabolic alterations of primiparous sows during late gestation. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 10, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Xiong, Y.; Yi, H.; Wu, Q.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, L. Effects of acute heat stress on intestinal microbiota in grow-finishing pigs, and associations with feed intake and serum profile. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 128, 840–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bidne, K.L.; Kvidera, S.S.; Ross, J.W.; Baumgard, L.H.; Keating, A.F. Impact of repeated lipopolysaccharide administration on ovarian signaling during the follicular phase of the estrous cycle in post-pubertal pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 3622–3634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Johnson, J.S.; Sanz-Fernandez, M.V.; Patience, J.F.; Ross, J.W.; Gabler, N.K.; Lucy, M.C.; Safranski, T.J.; Rhoads, R.P.; Baumgard, L.H. Effects of in utero heat stress on postnatal body composition in pigs: II. Finishing phase. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Charkoudian, N.; Stachenfeld, N.S. Reproductive hormone influences on thermoregulation in women. Compr. Physiol. 2014, 4, 793–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Charkoudian, N.; Stachenfeld, N. Sex hormone effects on autonomic mechanisms of thermoregulation in humans. Auton. Neurosci. 2016, 196, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rance, N.E.; Dacks, P.A.; Mittelman-Smith, M.A.; Romanovsky, A.A.; Krajewski-Hall, S.J. Modulation of body temperature and LH secretion by hypothalamic KNDy (kisspeptin, neurokinin B and dynorphin) neurons: A novel hypothesis on the mechanism of hot flushes. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2013, 34, 211–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhang, Z.; DiVittorio, J.R.; Joseph, A.M.; Correa, S.M. The effects of estrogens on neural circuits that control temperature. Endocrinology 2021, 162, bqab087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Silva, N.L.; Boulant, J.A. Effects of testosterone, estradiol, and temperature on neurons in preoptic tissue slices. Am. J. Physiol. 1986, 250, R625–R632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Itoh, F.; Obara, Y.; Fuse, H.; Rose, M.T.; Osaka, I.; Takahashi, H. Effects of heat exposure on plasma insulin, glucagon and metabolites in response to nutrient injection in heifers. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 1998, 119, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Itoh, F.; Obara, Y.; Rose, M.T.; Fuse, H. Heat influences on plasma insulin and glucagon in response to secretogogues in non-lactating dairy cows. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 1998, 15, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wheelock, J.B.; Rhoads, R.P.; VanBaale, M.J.; Sanders, S.R.; Baumgard, L.H. Effects of heat stress on energetic metabolism in lactating Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 644–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Baumgard, L.H.; Wheelock, J.B.; Sanders, S.R.; Moore, C.E.; Green, H.B.; Waldron, M.R.; Rhoads, R.P. Postabsorptive carbohydrate adaptations to heat stress and monensin supplementation in lactating Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 5620–5633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sanz Fernandez, M.V.; Johnson, J.S.; Abuajamieh, M.; Stoakes, S.K.; Seibert, J.T.; Cox, L.; Kahl, S.; Elsasser, T.H.; Ross, J.W.; Clay Isom, S.; et al. Effects of heat stress on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in growing pigs. Physiol. Rep. 2015, 3, e12315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sanz Fernandez, M.V.; Pearce, S.C.; Gabler, N.K.; Patience, J.F.; Wilson, M.E.; Socha, M.T.; Torrison, J.L.; Rhoads, R.P.; Baumgard, L.H. Effects of supplemental zinc amino acid complex on gut integrity in heat-stressed growing pigs. Animal 2014, 8, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Itoh, F.; Obara, Y.; Rose, M.T.; Fuse, H.; Hashimoto, H. Insulin and glucagon secretion in lactating cows during heat exposure. J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 76, 2182–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pearce, S.C.; Mani, V.; Boddicker, R.L.; Johnson, J.S.; Weber, T.E.; Ross, J.W.; Baumgard, L.H.; Gabler, N.K. Heat stress reduces barrier function and alters intestinal metabolism in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 90, 257–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sanz Fernandez, M.V.; Stoakes, S.K.; Abuajamieh, M.; Seibert, J.T.; Johnson, J.S.; Horst, E.A.; Rhoads, R.P.; Baumgard, L.H. Heat stress increases insulin sensitivity in pigs. Physiol. Rep. 2015, 3, e12478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Pearce, S.C.; Mani, V.; Boddicker, R.L.; Johnson, J.S.; Weber, T.E.; Ross, J.W.; Rhoads, R.P.; Baumgard, L.H.; Gabler, N.K. Heat stress reduces intestinal barrier integrity and favors intestinal glucose transport in growing pigs. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Pearce, S.C.; Sanz Fernandez, M.V.; Hollis, J.H.; Baumgard, L.H.; Gabler, N.K. Short-term exposure to heat stress attenuates appetite and intestinal integrity in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 92, 5444–5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Brüning, J.C.; Gautam, D.; Burks, D.J.; Gillette, J.; Schubert, M.; Orban, P.C.; Klein, R.; Krone, W.; Müller-Wieland, D.; Kahn, C.R. Role of brain insulin receptor in control of body weight and reproduction. Science 2000, 289, 2122–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sliwowska, J.H.; Fergani, C.; Gawałek, M.; Skowronska, B.; Fichna, P.; Lehman, M.N. Insulin: Its role in the central control of reproduction. Physiol. Behav. 2014, 133, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sakumoto, T.; Tokunaga, Y.; Tanaka, H.; Nohara, M.; Motegi, E.; Shinkawa, T.; Nakaza, A.; Higashi, M. Insulin resistance/hyperinsulinemia and reproductive disorders in infertile women. Reprod. Med. Biol. 2010, 9, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Riddle, O.; Bates, R.W.; Dykshorn, S.W. The preparation, identification and assay of prolactin—A hormone of the anterior pituitary. Am. J. Physiol. 1933, 105, 191–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Smith, V.G.; Hacker, R.R.; Brown, R.G. Effect of alterations in ambient temperature on serum prolactin concentration in steers. J. Anim. Sci. 1977, 44, 645–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Schillo, K.K.; Alliston, C.W.; Malven, P.V. Plasma concentrations of luteinizing hormone and prolactin in the ovariectomized ewe during induced hyperthermia. Biol. Reprod. 1978, 19, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ronchi, B.; Stradaioli, G.; Verini Supplizi, A.; Bernabucci, U.; Lacetera, N.; Accorsi, P.A.; Nardone, A.; Seren, E. Influence of heat stress or feed restriction on plasma progesterone, oestradiol-17β, LH, FSH, prolactin and cortisol in Holstein heifers. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2001, 68, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Alamer, M. The role of prolactin in thermoregulation and water balance during heat stress in domestic ruminants. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2011, 6, 1153–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Iguchi, M.; Littmann, A.E.; Chang, S.-H.; Wester, L.A.; Knipper, J.S.; Shields, R.K. Heat stress and cardiovascular, hormonal, and heat shock proteins in humans. J. Athl. Train. 2012, 47, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Kaufman, S.; Mackay, B.J. Plasma prolactin levels and body fluid deficits in the rat: Causal interactions and control of water intake. J. Physiol. 1983, 336, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Schams, D.; Stephan, E.; Hooley, R.D. Effect of prolactin inhibition under heat exposure on water intake and excretion of urine, sodium and potassium in bulls. Acta Endocrinol. 1980, 94, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Blake, M.J.; Buckley, A.R.; Zhang, M.; Buckley, D.J.; Lavoi, K.P. A novel heat shock response in prolactin-dependent Nb2 node lymphoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 29614–29620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. McNeilly, A.S.; Glasier, A.; Jonassen, J.; Howie, P.W. Evidence for direct inhibition of ovarian function by prolactin. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1982, 65, 559–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Laoharatchatathanin, T.; Rieanrakwong, D.; Hatsugai, Y.; Terashima, R.; Yonezawa, T.; Kurusu, S.; Kawaminami, M. Mast cell dynamics in the ovary are governed by GnRH and prolactin. Endocrinology 2023, 164, bqad144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Jonassen, J.A.; Baker, S.P.; McNeilly, A.S. Long-term hyperprolactinaemia reduces basal but not androgen-stimulated oestradiol production in small antral follicles of the rat ovary. J. Endocrinol. 1991, 129, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bachelot, A.; Binart, N. Reproductive role of prolactin. Reproduction 2007, 133, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Horseman, N.D.; Zhao, W.; Montecino-Rodriguez, E.; Tanaka, M.; Nakashima, K.; Engle, S.J.; Smith, F.; Markoff, E.; Dorshkind, K. Defective mammopoiesis, but normal hematopoiesis, in mice with a targeted disruption of the prolactin gene. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 6926–6935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ormandy, C.J.; Camus, A.; Barra, J.; Damotte, D.; Lucas, B.; Buteau, H.; Edery, M.; Brousse, N.; Babinet, C.; Binart, N.; et al. Null mutation of the prolactin receptor gene produces multiple reproductive defects in the mouse. Genes Dev. 1997, 11, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Grosdemouge, I.; Bachelot, A.; Lucas, A.; Baran, N.; Kelly, P.A.; Binart, N. Effects of deletion of the prolactin receptor on ovarian gene expression. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2003, 1, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Vincent, A.L.; Wang, L.; Tuggle, C.K.; Robic, A.; Rothschild, M.F. Prolactin receptor maps to pig chromosome 16. Mamm. Genome 1997, 8, 793–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Kim, K.S.; Seibert, J.T.; Edea, Z.; Graves, K.L.; Kim, E.S.; Keating, A.F.; Baumgard, L.H.; Ross, J.W.; Rothschild, M.F. Characterization of the acute heat stress response in gilts: III. Genome-wide association studies of thermotolerance traits in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 2074–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kelly, P.A.; Djiane, J.; Postel-Vinay, M.C.; Edery, M. The prolactin/growth hormone receptor family. Endocr. Rev. 1991, 12, 235–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ormandy, C.J.; Binart, N.; Helloco, C.; Kelly, P.A. Mouse prolactin receptor gene: Genomic organization reveals alternative promoter usage and generation of isoforms via alternative 3′-exon splicing. DNA Cell Biol. 1998, 17, 761–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Geisert, R.D.; Johnson, G.A.; Burghardt, R.C. Implantation and establishment of pregnancy in the pig. In Advances in Anatomy, Embryology and Cell Biology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 216, pp. 137–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Spencer, T.E.; Forde, N.; Lonergan, P. The role of progesterone and conceptus-derived factors in uterine biology during early pregnancy in ruminants. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 5941–5950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lonergan, P.; Forde, N.; Spencer, T. Role of progesterone in embryo development in cattle. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2016, 28, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Bidne, K.L.; Romoser, M.R.; Ross, J.W.; Baumgard, L.H.; Keating, A.F. Heat stress during the luteal phase decreases luteal size but does not affect circulating progesterone in gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 4314–4322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Townson, D.H.; Pate, J.L. Mechanism of action of TNF-alpha-stimulated prostaglandin production in cultured bovine luteal cells. Prostaglandins 1996, 52, 361–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Lüttgenau, J.; Lingemann, B.; Wellnitz, O.; Hankele, A.K.; Schmicke, M.; Ulbrich, S.E.; Bruckmaier, R.M.; Bollwein, H. Repeated intrauterine infusions of lipopolysaccharide alter gene expression and lifespan of the bovine corpus luteum. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 6639–6653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Suzuki, C.; Yoshioka, K.; Iwamura, S.; Hirose, H. Endotoxin induces delayed ovulation following endocrine aberration during the proestrous phase in Holstein heifers. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2001, 20, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Tomaszewska-Zaremba, D.; Haziak, K.; Tomczyk, M.; Herman, A.P. Inflammation and LPS-binding protein enable the stimulatory effect of endotoxin on prolactin secretion in the ovine anterior pituitary: Ex vivo study. Mediat. Inflamm. 2018, 2018, 5427089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Ben-Jonathan, N.; Hugo, E.R.; Brandebourg, T.D.; LaPensee, C.R. Focus on prolactin as a metabolic hormone. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 17, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Arumugam, R.; Horowitz, E.; Noland, R.C.; Lu, D.; Fleenor, D.; Freemark, M. Regulation of islet beta-cell pyruvate metabolism: Interactions of prolactin, glucose, and dexamethasone. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 3074–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Barrett, R.; Narasimhulu, C.A.; Parthasarathy, S. Adrenergic hormones induce extrapituitary prolactin gene expression in leukocytes—Potential implications in obesity. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lopez-Rincon, G.; Pereira-Suarez, A.L.; Del Toro-Arreola, S.; Sanchez-Hernandez, P.E.; Ochoa-Zarzosa, A.; Munoz-Valle, J.F.; Estrada-Chavez, C. Lipopolysaccharide induces the expression of an autocrine prolactin loop enhancing inflammatory response in monocytes. J. Inflamm. 2013, 10, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Olmos-Ortiz, A.; Déciga-García, M.; Preciado-Martínez, E.; Bermejo-Martínez, L.; Flores-Espinosa, P.; Mancilla-Herrera, I.; Irles, C.; Helguera-Repetto, A.C.; Quesada-Reyna, B.; Goffin, V.; et al. Prolactin decreases LPS-induced inflammatory cytokines by inhibiting TLR-4/NFκB signaling in the human placenta. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 25, 660–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Flores-Espinosa, P.; Vega-Sánchez, R.; Mancilla-Herrera, I.; Bermejo-Martínez, L.; Preciado-Martínez, E.; Olmos-Ortiz, A.; Méndez, I.; Estrada-Gutiérrez, G.; Quesada-Reyna, B.; Helguera-Repetto, C.; et al. Prolactin selectively inhibits the LPS-induced chemokine secretion of human foetal membranes. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020, 33, 4083–4089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Kluger, M.J.; Rudolph, K.; Soszynski, D.; Conn, C.A.; Leon, L.R.; Kozak, W.; Wallen, E.S.; Moseley, P.L. Effect of heat stress on LPS-induced fever and tumor necrosis factor. Am. J. Physiol. 1997, 273, R858–R863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Montilla, S.I.; Johnson, T.P.; Pearce, S.C.; Gardan-Salmon, D.; Gabler, N.K.; Ross, J.W.; Rhoads, R.P.; Baumgard, L.H.; Lonergan, S.M.; Selsby, J.T. Heat stress causes oxidative stress but not inflammatory signaling in porcine skeletal muscle. Temperature 2014, 1, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Komadan, N.; Shandilya, U.K.; Canovas, A.; Mallard, B.A.; Karrow, N.A. Assessment of heat stress response of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from dairy cows stress-phenotyped using bacterial lipopolysaccharide endotoxin. J. Dairy Sci. 2025, 108, 13981–13994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Lemal, P.; May, K.; König, S.; Schroyen, M.; Gengler, N. Invited review: From heat stress to disease—Immune response and candidate genes involved in cattle thermotolerance. J. Dairy Sci. 2023, 106, 4471–4488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Tatemoto, H.; Sakurai, N.; Muto, N. Protection of porcine oocytes against apoptotic cell death caused by oxidative stress during in vitro maturation: Role of cumulus cells. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 63, 805–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Mohammad, S.; Thiemermann, C. Role of metabolic endotoxemia in systemic inflammation and potential interventions. Front. Immunol. 2021, 11, 594150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Chen, B.; Gautron, L. Gut-derived lipopolysaccharides and metabolic endotoxemia: A critical review. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2025, 329, E746–E754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Giaccari, C.; Antonouli, S.; Anifandis, G.; Cecconi, S.; Di Nisio, V. An update on physiopathological roles of Akt in the reprodAKTive mammalian ovary. Life 2024, 14, 722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Akira, S.; Takeda, K. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004, 4, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ghoneum, A.; Said, N. PI3K-AKT-mTOR and NFκB pathways in ovarian cancer: Implications for targeted therapeutics. Cancers 2019, 11, 949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Contreras-Méndez, L.A.; Medrano, J.F.; Thomas, M.G.; Enns, R.M.; Speidel, S.E.; Luna-Nevárez, G.; López-Castro, P.A.; Rivera-Acuña, F.; Luna-Nevárez, P. The anti-Müllerian hormone as endocrine and molecular marker associated with reproductive performance in Holstein dairy cows exposed to heat stress. Animals 2024, 14, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Picard, D. The role of heat-shock proteins in the regulation of steroid receptor function. ChemInform 2000, 31, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Zhou, L.T.; Gokyer, D.; Madkins, K.; Beestrum, M.; Horton, D.E.; Duncan, F.E.; Babayev, E. The effects of heat stress on the ovary, follicles and oocytes: A systematic review. bioRxiv 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Sweet, L.J.; Morrison, B.D.; Pessin, J.E. Isolation of functional αβ heterodimers from the purified human placental α2β2 heterotetrameric insulin receptor complex. A structural basis for insulin binding heterogeneity. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 6939–6942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Kido, Y.; Nakae, J.; Accili, D. Clinical review 125: The insulin receptor and its cellular targets. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 86, 972–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Poretsky, L.; Cataldo, N.A.; Rosenwaks, Z.; Giudice, L.C. The insulin-related ovarian regulatory system in health and disease. Endocr. Rev. 1999, 20, 535–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Wu, X.; Sallinen, K.; Anttila, L.; Mäkinen, M.; Luo, C.; Pöllänen, P.; Erkkola, R. Expression of insulin-receptor substrate-1 and -2 in ovaries from women with insulin resistance and from controls. Fertil. Steril. 2000, 74, 564–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Dickson, M.J.; Hager, C.L.; Al-Shaibi, A.; Thomas, P.Q.; Baumgard, L.H.; Ross, J.W.; Keating, A.F. Impact of heat stress during the follicular phase on porcine ovarian steroidogenic and phosphatidylinositol-3 signaling. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 2162–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Liu, K.; Rajareddy, S.; Liu, L.; Jagarlamudi, K.; Boman, K.; Selstam, G.; Reddy, P. Control of mammalian oocyte growth and early follicular development by the oocyte PI3 kinase pathway: New roles for an old timer. Dev. Biol. 2006, 299, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Liu, L.; Rajareddy, S.; Reddy, P.; Jagarlamudi, K.; Du, C.; Shen, Y.; Guo, Y.; Boman, K.; Lundin, E.; Ottander, U.; et al. Phosphorylation and inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 by soluble kit ligand in mouse oocytes during early follicular development. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2007, 38, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Reddy, P.; Adhikari, D.; Zheng, W.; Liang, S.; Hamalainen, T.; Tohonen, V.; Ogawa, W.; Noda, T.; Volarevic, S.; Huhtaniemi, I.; et al. PDK1 signaling in oocytes controls reproductive aging and lifespan by manipulating the survival of primordial follicles. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, 2813–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Reddy, P.; Liu, L.; Adhikari, D.; Jagarlamudi, K.; Rajareddy, S.; Shen, Y.; Du, C.; Tang, W.; Hamalainen, T.; Peng, S.L.; et al. Oocyte-specific deletion of Pten causes premature activation of the primordial follicle pool. Science 2008, 319, 611–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Adhikari, D.; Zheng, W.; Shen, Y.; Gorre, N.; Hamalainen, T.; Cooney, A.J.; Huhtaniemi, I.; Lan, Z.J.; Liu, K. Tsc/mTORC1 signaling in oocytes governs the quiescence and activation of primordial follicles. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Blume-Jensen, P.; Hunter, T. Oncogenic kinase signalling. Nature 2001, 411, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Cantley, L.C. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway. Science 2002, 296, 1655–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Fayard, E.; Tintignac, L.A.; Baudry, A.; Hemmings, B.A. Protein kinase B/Akt at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118, 5675–5678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Datta, S.R.; Brunet, A.; Greenberg, M.E. Cellular survival: A play in three Akts. Genes Dev. 1999, 13, 2905–2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Kim, Y.B.; Peroni, O.D.; Franke, T.F.; Kahn, B.B. Divergent regulation of Akt1 and Akt2 isoforms in insulin target tissues of obese Zucker rats. Diabetes 2000, 49, 847–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Burgering, B.M.T.; Medema, R.H. Decisions on life and death: FOXO Forkhead transcription factors are in command when PKB/Akt is off duty. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2003, 73, 689–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Tran, H.; Brunet, A.; Griffith, E.C.; Greenberg, M.E. The many forks in FOXO’s road. Sci. STKE 2003, 2003, RE5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Kops, G.J.P.L.; Dansen, T.B.; Polderman, P.E.; Saarloos, I.; Wirtz, K.W.A.; Coffer, P.J.; Huang, T.T.; Bos, J.L.; Medema, R.H.; Burgering, B.M.T. Forkhead transcription factor FOXO3a protects quiescent cells from oxidative stress. Nature 2002, 419, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Castrillon, D.H.; Miao, L.; Kollipara, R.; Horner, J.W.; DePinho, R.A. Suppression of ovarian follicle activation in mice by the transcription factor Foxo3a. Science 2003, 301, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Adhikari, D.; Liu, K. Molecular mechanisms underlying the activation of mammalian primordial follicles. Endocr. Rev. 2009, 30, 438–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Poltorak, A.; He, X.; Smirnova, I.; Liu, M.Y.; Van Huffel, C.; Du, X.; Birdwell, D.; Alejos, E.; Silva, M.; Galanos, C.; et al. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: Mutations in Tlr4 gene. Science 1998, 282, 2085–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Hoshino, K.; Takeuchi, O.; Kawai, T.; Sanjo, H.; Ogawa, T.; Takeda, Y.; Takeda, K.; Akira, S. Cutting edge: Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-deficient mice are hyporesponsive to lipopolysaccharide: Evidence for TLR4 as the Lps gene product. J. Immunol. 1999, 162, 3749–3752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Akira, S.; Uematsu, S.; Takeuchi, O. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 2006, 124, 783–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Adashi, E.Y.; Resnick, C.E.; Croft, C.S.; Payne, D.W. Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibits gonadotropin hormonal action in nontransformed ovarian granulosa cells. A modulatory noncytotoxic property. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 11591–11597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Ghersevich, S.; Isomaa, V.; Vihko, P. Cytokine regulation of the expression of estrogenic biosynthetic enzymes in cultured rat granulosa cells. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2001, 172, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Hale, B.J.; Hager, C.L.; Seibert, J.T.; Selsby, J.T.; Baumgard, L.H.; Keating, A.F.; Ross, J.W. Heat stress induces autophagy in pig ovaries during follicular development. Biol. Reprod. 2017, 97, 426–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Hale, B.J.; Li, Y.; Adur, M.K.; Keating, A.F.; Baumgard, L.H.; Ross, J.W. Characterization of the effects of heat stress on autophagy induction in the pig oocyte. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2021, 19, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Luo, M.; Li, L.; Xiao, C.; Sun, Y.; Wang, G.L. Heat stress impairs mice granulosa cell function by diminishing steroids production and inducing apoptosis. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2016, 412, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Roach, C.M.; Bidne, K.L.; Romoser, M.R.; Ross, J.W.; Baumgard, L.H.; Keating, A.F. Impact of heat stress on prolactin-mediated ovarian JAK-STAT signaling in postpubertal gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 2022, 100, skac118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Roach, C.M.; Mayorga, E.J.; Baumgard, L.H.; Ross, J.W.; Keating, A.F. Heat stress alters the ovarian proteome in prepubertal gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 2024, 102, skae053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Burel, C.; Mezger, V.; Pinto, M.; Rallu, M.; Trigon, S.; Morange, M. Mammalian heat shock protein families. Expression and functions. Experientia 1992, 48, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Lánská, V.; Chmelíková, E.; Sedmíková, M.; Petr, J.; Rajmon, R.; Jeseta, M.; Rozinek, J. Expression of heat shock protein 70 in pig oocytes: Heat shock response during oocyte growth. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2006, 96, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Seibert, J.T.; Adur, M.K.; Schultz, R.B.; Thomas, P.Q.; Kiefer, Z.E.; Keating, A.F.; Baumgard, L.H.; Ross, J.W. Differentiating between the effects of heat stress and lipopolysaccharide on the porcine ovarian heat shock protein response. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 4965–4973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Li, H.; Guo, S.; Cai, L.; Ma, W.; Shi, Z. Lipopolysaccharide and heat stress impair the estradiol biosynthesis in granulosa cells via increase of HSP70 and inhibition of smad3 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation. Cell. Signal. 2017, 30, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Ryter, S.W.; Cloonan, S.M.; Choi, A.M.K. Autophagy: A critical regulator of cellular metabolism and homeostasis. Mol. Cells 2013, 36, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Khan, M.Z.; Khan, A.; Chen, W.; Chai, W.; Wang, C. Advancements in Genetic Biomarkers and Exogenous Antioxidant Supplementation for Safeguarding Mammalian Cells against Heat-Induced Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Stringer, J.M.; Alesi, L.R.; Winship, A.L.; Hutt, K.J. Beyond apoptosis: Evidence of other regulated cell death pathways in the ovary throughout development and life. Hum. Reprod. Update 2023, 29, 434–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Wu, H.; Han, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhao, R.; Dai, S.; Guo, Y.; Li, N.; Yang, F.; Zeng, S. The Assembly and Activation of the PANoptosome Promote Porcine Granulosa Cell Programmed Cell Death during Follicular Atresia. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2024, 15, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Li, L.; Wu, J.; Luo, M.; Sun, Y.; Wang, G. The effect of heat stress on gene expression, synthesis of steroids, and apoptosis in bovine granulosa cells. Cell Stress Chaperones 2016, 21, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Liu, J.; He, B.; Yin, C.; Chang, Z.; Zhao, R. Transcriptomic responses of porcine cumulus cells to heat exposure during oocytes in vitro maturation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2021, 88, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Brown, J.D.; Day, A.M.; Taylor, S.R.; Tomalin, L.E.; Morgan, B.A.; Veal, E.A. A peroxiredoxin promotes H2O2 signaling and oxidative stress resistance by oxidizing a thioredoxin family protein. Cell Rep. 2013, 5, 1425–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Adachi, M.; Liu, Y.; Fujii, K.; Calderwood, S.K.; Nakai, A.; Imai, K.; Shinomura, Y. Oxidative stress impairs the heat stress response and delays unfolded protein recovery. PLoS ONE 2009, 11, e7719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Cavallari, F.C.; Leal, C.L.V.; Zvi, R.; Hansen, P.J. Effects of melatonin on production of reactive oxygen species and developmental competence of bovine oocytes exposed to heat shock and oxidative stress during in vitro maturation. Zygote 2019, 27, 180–186, Erratum in Zygote 2019, 27, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Garred, P.; Honore, C.; Ma, Y.J.; Rorvig, S.; Cowland, J.; Borregaard, N.; Hummelshoj, T. The genetics of ficolins. J. Innate Immun. 2010, 2, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Pennarossa, G.; Maffei, S.; Rahman, M.M.; Berruti, G.; Brevini, T.A.; Gandolfi, F. Characterization of the constitutive pig ovary heat shock chaperone machinery and its response to acute thermal stress or to seasonal variations. Biol. Reprod. 2012, 87, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Bloemhof, S.; van der Waaij, E.H.; Merks, J.W.; Knol, E.F. Sow line differences in heat stress tolerance expressed in reproductive performance traits. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, 3330–3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Systemic physiological responses to heat stress in female pigs. Schematic diagram illustrating systemic consequences of heat stress (HS) in female pigs. HS triggers a reduction in feed intake (inappetence), alterations in endocrine signaling (increased insulin, prolactin, altered progesterone and estradiol), and metabolic disruptions. Blood is redirected to the periphery to enhance heat dissipation, causing intestinal hypoperfusion, hyperpermeability, and low-level endotoxemia [lipopolysaccharide (LPS) leakage]. These systemic alterations independently and synergistically impair ovarian function and reproductive competence. Key organs affected include the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, pituitary, and ovaries. Arrows indicate causal links between HS, systemic alterations, and reproductive outcomes.
Figure 1. Systemic physiological responses to heat stress in female pigs. Schematic diagram illustrating systemic consequences of heat stress (HS) in female pigs. HS triggers a reduction in feed intake (inappetence), alterations in endocrine signaling (increased insulin, prolactin, altered progesterone and estradiol), and metabolic disruptions. Blood is redirected to the periphery to enhance heat dissipation, causing intestinal hypoperfusion, hyperpermeability, and low-level endotoxemia [lipopolysaccharide (LPS) leakage]. These systemic alterations independently and synergistically impair ovarian function and reproductive competence. Key organs affected include the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, pituitary, and ovaries. Arrows indicate causal links between HS, systemic alterations, and reproductive outcomes.
Cimb 48 00304 g001
Figure 2. Proposed link between intestinal hyperpermeability and endocrine/metabolic responses. Schematic representation of systemic and ovarian responses to heat stress (HS) in pigs. Key cytokines, including Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-, IL-6, and IL-8, mediate inflammatory signaling that contributes to intestinal barrier dysfunction, systemic endotoxemia, and ovarian perturbations. These systemic changes interact with ovarian signaling pathways—such as phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT) signaling pathway, Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK–STAT), Toll like receptor (TLR)4-mediated inflammation, oxidative stress, and heat shock protein (HSP) responses—to impair follicular development, steroidogenesis, and corpus luteum function.
Figure 2. Proposed link between intestinal hyperpermeability and endocrine/metabolic responses. Schematic representation of systemic and ovarian responses to heat stress (HS) in pigs. Key cytokines, including Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-, IL-6, and IL-8, mediate inflammatory signaling that contributes to intestinal barrier dysfunction, systemic endotoxemia, and ovarian perturbations. These systemic changes interact with ovarian signaling pathways—such as phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT) signaling pathway, Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK–STAT), Toll like receptor (TLR)4-mediated inflammation, oxidative stress, and heat shock protein (HSP) responses—to impair follicular development, steroidogenesis, and corpus luteum function.
Cimb 48 00304 g002
Figure 3. Ovarian molecular pathways altered by heat stress. Schematic representation of key ovarian molecular pathways altered by HS in female pigs. Heat stress impacts insulin/PI3K/AKT) signaling, JAK–STAT pathways, TLR4/NFκB inflammatory signaling, steroidogenesis (STAR, CYP19A, P4/E2 production), heat shock protein expression (HSP70, HSP110), oxidative stress responses, and autophagy/cell death mechanisms (LC3B-II, BECN1, BCL2 family). These disruptions collectively impair follicle activation, oocyte growth, corpus luteum function, and overall reproductive competence.
Figure 3. Ovarian molecular pathways altered by heat stress. Schematic representation of key ovarian molecular pathways altered by HS in female pigs. Heat stress impacts insulin/PI3K/AKT) signaling, JAK–STAT pathways, TLR4/NFκB inflammatory signaling, steroidogenesis (STAR, CYP19A, P4/E2 production), heat shock protein expression (HSP70, HSP110), oxidative stress responses, and autophagy/cell death mechanisms (LC3B-II, BECN1, BCL2 family). These disruptions collectively impair follicle activation, oocyte growth, corpus luteum function, and overall reproductive competence.
Cimb 48 00304 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kasimanickam, R.; Ferreira, J.C.P.; Kastelic, J.P. From Systemic Stress to Ovarian Failure: Heat Stress-Induced Infertility in Pigs as a Model for Reproductive Dysfunction. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2026, 48, 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48030304

AMA Style

Kasimanickam R, Ferreira JCP, Kastelic JP. From Systemic Stress to Ovarian Failure: Heat Stress-Induced Infertility in Pigs as a Model for Reproductive Dysfunction. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2026; 48(3):304. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48030304

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kasimanickam, Ramanathan, Joao C. P. Ferreira, and John P. Kastelic. 2026. "From Systemic Stress to Ovarian Failure: Heat Stress-Induced Infertility in Pigs as a Model for Reproductive Dysfunction" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 48, no. 3: 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48030304

APA Style

Kasimanickam, R., Ferreira, J. C. P., & Kastelic, J. P. (2026). From Systemic Stress to Ovarian Failure: Heat Stress-Induced Infertility in Pigs as a Model for Reproductive Dysfunction. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 48(3), 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48030304

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop