Multifunctional Bioactivity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SH-53: Analysis of Multiple Antagonistic and Synergistic Growth Promotion Mechanisms Based on Whole Genome
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Genomic Sequencing and Annotation of Strain SH-53
2.2. Prediction of NP-BGCs in Strain SH-53 Genome
2.3. Evaluation of Strain Bioactivity and Seed Germination Promotion
2.3.1. Detection of IAA Production Capability
Quantitation
2.3.2. Detection of Siderophore Production Capability of Strains
2.3.3. Physiological and Biochemical Experiments of Strain
2.3.4. Seed Germination Experiment of Strain SH-53
3. Results
3.1. Analysis of Genetic Information and Gene Structure Characteristics of the Strain Based on Whole Genome Sequencing
3.2. Exploration of Bioactivity and Mechanism Analysis Based on Whole Genome Sequencing
3.3. Gene Annotation Results
3.3.1. Analysis Results of COG Database Genes in Strain SH-53
3.3.2. Gene Analysis Results of Strain SH-53 in the GO Database
3.3.3. Results of KEGG Database Gene Analysis of Strain SH-53
3.3.4. Annotation of Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes in Strain SH-53
3.3.5. Prediction of NP BGCs in the Genome of Strain SH-53
3.3.6. Gene Analysis of ISR in the Strain
3.3.7. Hemolytic Activity Analysis of Strain SH-53
3.3.8. Antibiotic Resistance Analysis of Strain SH-53 (CARD)
3.4. Evaluation of Biological Activity and Seed Germination Promotion by Strain SH-53
3.4.1. Evaluation of Biological Activity of Strain SH-53
3.4.2. Determination of Seed Germination-Promoting Traits of Strain SH-53
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kazerooni, E.; Maharachchikumbura, S.; Al-Sadi, A.; Kang, S.; Yun, B.; Lee, I. Biocontrol potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens against Botrytis pelargonii and Alternaria alternata on Capsicum annuum. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ying, T.; Wu, P.; Gao, L.; Wang, C.; Zhang, T.; Liu, S.; Huang, R. Isolation and characterization of a new strain of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and its effect on strawberry preservation. LWT 2022, 165, 113712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, N.; Yang, D.; Kendall, J.; Borriss, R.; Druzhinina, I.; Kubicek, C.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, R. Comparative genomic analysis of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis reveals evolutional traits for adaptation to plant-associated habitats. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, B.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, L.; Zeng, Z.; Gong, L.; Wu, Y.; Li, W.-F. Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens instead of antibiotics on growth performance, intestinal health, and intestinal microbiota of broilers. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 679368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.; Tran, P.; Dam, H.; Nguyen, H.; Le, T.; Ho, P.; Nguyen, L. Whole genome sequence analysis of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain S2.5 as a potential probiotic for feed supplement in livestock production. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2024, 22, 100404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, H.; Yang, P.; Zhong, M.; Bilal, M.; Xu, H.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, J.; Liang, N.; Liu, S.; Zhao, L.; et al. Isolation of a potential probiotic strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LPB-18 and identification of antimicrobial compounds responsible for inhibition of food-borne pathogens. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 2186–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Migunova, V.; Sasanelli, N. Bacteria as biocontrol tool against phytoparasitic nematodes. Plants 2021, 10, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, Z.; Qu, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Zhou, E.; Qi, Y.; Yin, Y.; Rao, Y.; Tian, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, L.; et al. Genomic inference of the metabolism and evolution of the archaeal phylum Aigarchaeota. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Yang, J.; Huang, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, Q.; Lyu, L.; Ju, F.; Li, J.; Zhang, S. Exploring the role of organotrophic microbes in geochemical cycling of cold seep sediments. Innov. Geosci. 2025, 3, 100123-1–100123-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Q.; Xie, Y.; Gu, F.; Tu, C.; He, J.; Guo, Q.; Wu, Y.; Xu, M.; Liu, J. Potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens QY-1 as a biocontrol agent of Botrytis cinerea in postharvest blueberry. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2023, 128, 102117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, L.; Fu, Y.; Deng, S.; Wu, Y.; Gao, M. Genomic, antimicrobial, and aphicidal traits of Bacillus velezensis ATR2, and its biocontrol potential against ginger rhizome rot disease caused by Bacillus pumilus. Microorganisms 2021, 10, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Kuipers, O. Identification and classification of known and putative antimicrobial compounds produced by a wide variety of Bacillales species. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, L.; Zhao, C.; Wang, E.; Raza, A.; Yin, C. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as an excellent agent for biofertilizer and biocontrol in agriculture: An overview for its mechanisms. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 259, 127016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tanaka, K.; Amaki, Y.; Ishihara, A.; Nakajima, H. Synergistic effects of [Ile7] surfactin homologues with bacillomycin D in suppression of gray mold disease by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens biocontrol strain SD-32. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 5344–5353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.; Koumoutsi, A.; Scholz, R.; Schneider, K.; Vater, J.; Süssmuth, R.; Piel, J.; Borriss, R. Genome analysis of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 reveals its potential for biocontrol of plant pathogens. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 140, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, Q.; Zhang, H.; You, J.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, J.; Aimaier, R.; Zhang, J.; Han, S.; Zhao, H.; et al. Transcriptome and metabolome analyses reveal that Bacillus subtilis BS-Z15 lipopeptides mycosubtilin homologue mediates plant defense responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1088220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Q.; Xie, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Gu, X.; Yang, P.; Hu, G.; Wang, Q. Organization, evolution and function of fengycin biosynthesis gene clusters in the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens group. Phytopathol. Res. 2021, 3, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, N.; Liao, Y.; Shi, Z.; Shen, Y.; Yang, T.; Feng, L.; Yi, X.; Tang, J.; Chen, Q.; Yang, P. Identification of Three Strains of Bacillus from the Forest Soil of Wuliang Mountain and Mining of Their Bioactivities. Biotechnol. Bull. 2024, 40, 277–288. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, N.; Liao, Y.; Shen, Y.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Q.; Yang, P. Optimization of fermentation conditions and biocontrol effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SH-53 from rhizosphere of rumex. J. Plant Prot. 2024, 51, 817–829. [Google Scholar]
- Roller, B.; Stoddard, S.; Schmidt, T. Exploiting rRNA operon copy number to investigate bacterial reproductive strategies. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 1, 16160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belbahri, L.; Bouket, A.; Rekik, I.; Alenezi, F.; Vallat, A.; Luptakova, L.; Petrovova, E.; Oszako, T.; Cherrad, S.; Vacher, S.; et al. Comparative genomics of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains reveals a core genome with traits for habitat adaptation and a secondary metabolites rich accessory genome. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- She, T.; Tan, D.; Balcazar, J.; Friman, V.; Wang, D.; Zhu, D.; Ye, M.; Sun, M.; Yuan, S.; Hu, F. Phage-mediated horizontal transfer of Salmonella enterica virulence genes with regulatory feedback from the host. iMeta 2025, 4, e70042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liao, H.; Liu, C.; Zhou, S.; Liu, C.; Eldridge, D.; Ai, C.; Wilhelm, S.; Singh, B.; Liang, X.; Radosevich, M.; et al. Prophage-encoded antibiotic resistance genes are enriched in human-impacted environments. Nat. Commun. 2025, 15, 8315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- D’Rose, V.; Ganapathy Bhat, S. Whole genome sequence analysis enabled affirmation of the probiotic potential of marine sporulator Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BTSS3 isolated from Centroscyllium fabricii. Gene 2024, 864, 147305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Murugavel, K.; Karthikeyan, G.; Raveendran, M.; Sendhilvel, V.; Sudha, A.; Karthiba, L.; Rajendran, L. Insights into the genome sequence of an endophytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (TNOB22) from tea and its promising biocontrol activity against major diseases of tea. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2025, 138, 102680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.; Tao, H.; Gaballa, A.; Pi, H.; Helmann, J. The extracytoplasmic sigma factor σX supports biofilm formation and increases biocontrol efficacy in Bacillus velezensis 118. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 5315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glaeser, S.; Kämpfer, P. Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) in prokaryotic taxonomy. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 38, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, S.; Hartmann, A.; Gao, X.; Borriss, R. Biocontrol mechanism by root-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42—A review. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sylla, J.; Alsanius, B.; Krüger, E.; Reineke, A.; Strohmeier, S.; Wohanka, W. Leaf microbiota of strawberries as affected by biological control agents. Phytopathology 2013, 103, 1001–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Shao, J.; Li, B.; Yan, X.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, R. Contribution of bacillomycin D in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 to antifungal activity and biofilm formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 808–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Prajapati, V.; Prajapati, S.; Bais, H.; Lu, J. Comparative genome analysis of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens focusing on phylogenomics, functional traits, and prevalence of antimicrobial and virulence genes. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 724217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lam, V.B.; Meyer, T.; Arias, A.A.; Ongena, M.; Oni, F.E.; Höfte, M. Bacillus cyclic lipopeptides iturin and fengycin to control rice blast caused by Pyricularia oryzae in potting and acid sulfate soils by direct antagonism and induced systemic resistance. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lv, J.; Da, R.; Cheng, Y.; Tuo, X.; Wei, J.; Jiang, K.; Monisayo, A.; Han, B. Mechanism of antibacterial activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens C-1 lipopeptide toward anaerobic Clostridium difficile. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 3104613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yuan, Q.; Yang, P.; Liu, Y.; Tabl, K.; Guo, M.; Zhang, J.; Wu, A.; Liao, Y.; Huang, T.; He, W. Iturin and fengycin lipopeptides inhibit pathogenic Fusarium by targeting multiple components of the cell membrane and their regulative effects in wheat. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2025, 67, 2184–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, J.; Walsh, C. Action and timing of BacC and BacD in the late stages of biosynthesis of the dipeptide antibiotic bacilysin. Biochemistry 2013, 52, 889–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Feng, H.; Chen, L.; Zhang, H.; Dong, X.; Xiong, Q.; Zhang, R. Root-secreted spermine binds to Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 histidine kinase KinD and modulates biofilm formation. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2020, 33, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Li, J.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Peng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Hu, M.; Lin, W.; Wu, Z. Effects of quorum sensing and quorum quenching mediated by AHLs on plant-rhizosphere microbial interactions. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 2024, 32, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Jia, R.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Ji, X.; Sadiq, F.; Wang, X.; Zhang, G. The role of quorum sensing effector ComA in regulating biofilm formation and surfactin production in Bacillus subtilis ASAG 010. Food Biosci. 2025, 69, 106842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.; Zhang, N.; Xia, L.; Li, Q.; Shao, J.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, R. ResDE two-component regulatory system mediates oxygen limitation-induced biofilm formation by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02744-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, Z.; Gu, S.; Zhang, X.; Xue, J.; Yan, T.; Guo, S.; Pommier, T.; Jousset, A.; Yang, T.; Xu, Y.; et al. Siderophore interactions drive the ability of Pseudomonas spp. consortia to protect tomato against Ralstonia solanacearum. Hortic. Res. 2024, 11, uhae186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, S.; Wei, Z.; Shao, Z.; Friman, V.; Cao, K.; Yang, T.; Kramer, J.; Wang, X.; Li, M.; Mei, X.; et al. Competition for iron drives phytopathogen control by natural rhizosphere microbiomes. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 1002–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Montejano-Ramírez, V.; Valencia-Cantero, E. Cross-talk between iron deficiency response and defense establishment in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Neilands, J.B. Siderophores: Structure and function of microbial iron transport compounds. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 26723–26726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, X.; Qiao, W.; Dong, Y.; Yang, H.; Xu, H.; Qiao, M. 3-Butanediol dehydrogenase is more efficient than acetoin reductase at metabolizing reserve carbon to improve carbon cycling pathways in Lactococcus lactis N8. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 299, 140023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryu, C.; Farag, M.; Hu, C.; Reddy, M.; Kloepper, J.; Paré, P. Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mihalovits, L.; Ferenczy, G.; Keserű, G. Catalytic mechanism and covalent inhibition of UDP-N-Acetylglucosamine Enolpyruvyl Transferase (MurA): Implications to the design of novel antibacterials. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019, 59, 5161–5173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nirody, J.; Budin, I.; Rangamani, P. ATP synthase: Evolution, energetics, and membrane interactions. J. Gen. Physiol. 2020, 152, e201912475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, C.; Zhao, W.; Liu, D.; Yang, R.; Cui, Z.; Zou, D.; Li, D.; Wei, X.; Xiong, H.; Niu, C. Screening, identification, engineering, and characterization of Bacillus-derived α-amylase for effective tobacco starch degradation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 282, 137364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Liu, X.; Wu, M.; Ge, S. Molecular insights into the antifungal mechanism of bacilysin. J. Mol. Model. 2018, 24, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erega, A.; Stefanic, P.; Dogsa, I.; Danevčič, T.; Simunovic, K.; Klančnik, A.; Možina, S.; Mulec, M. Bacillaene mediates the inhibitory effect of Bacillus subtilis on Campylobacter jejuni biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e02955-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Y.; Chen, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J.; Xiao, R.; Wang, X.; Liu, B.; Chen, M.; He, J. Lipopeptide C17 fengycin B exhibits a novel antifungal mechanism by triggering metacaspase-dependent apoptosis in Fusarium oxysporum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 7943–7953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, Q.; Bie, X.; Lu, Z.; Lv, F.; Tao, Y.; Qu, X. Effects of fengycin from Bacillus subtilis fmbJ on apoptosis and necrosis in Rhizopus stolonifer. J. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 675–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lyng, M.; Jørgensen, J.; Schostag, M.; Jarmusch, S.; Aguilar, D.; Lozano-Andrade, C.; Kovács, Á. Competition for iron shapes metabolic antagonism between Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas marginalis. ISME J. 2024, 18, wrad001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, J.; Xie, X.; Li, B.; Yang, L.; Song, F.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, M. Complete genome analysis and antimicrobial mechanism of Bacillus velezensis GX0002980 reveals its biocontrol potential against mango anthracnose disease. Microbiol. Spectr. 2025, 13, e02685-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muñoz, C.Y.; Zhou, L.; Yi, Y.; Kuipers, O.P. Biocontrol properties from phyllospheric bacteria isolated from Solanum lycopersicum and Lactuca sativa and genome mining of antimicrobial gene clusters. BMC Genom. 2022, 23, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Li, S.; Zhou, X.; Du, C.; Fang, J.; Li, X.; Zhao, J.; Ding, F.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens promotes cluster root formation of white lupin under low phosphorus by mediating auxin levels. Plant Physiol. 2025, 197, kiae676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sorokan, A.; Veselova, S.; Benkovskaya, G.; Maksimov, I. Endophytic strain Bacillus subtilis 26D increases levels of phytohormones and repairs growth of potato plants after colorado potato beetle damage. Plants 2021, 10, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussein, K.; Kadhum, N.; Yassera, Y. The role of bacteria Bacillus subtilis in improving rooting response of Mung bean (Vigna ratiata) cuttings. J. Contemp. Med. Sci. 2016, 2, 88–92. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Gao, M.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.; Yu, S.; Lu, L. Halotolerant Enterobacter asburiae A103 isolated from the halophyte Salix linearistipularis: Genomic analysis and growth-promoting effects on Medicago sativa under alkali stress. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 289, 127909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Hu, Q.P. Studying of the promotion mechanism of Bacillus subtilis QM3 on wheat seed germination based on β-amylase. Open Life Sci. 2020, 15, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, J.; Dong, A.; Xiong, G.; Liu, Y.; Hossain, S.; Liu, S.; Gao, N.; Li, S.; Wang, J.; Qiu, D. Production of highly active extracellular amylase and cellulase from Bacillus subtilis ZIM3 and a recombinant strain with a potential application in tobacco fermentation. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, S.; Kaur, K.; Kumar, V.; Tiwari, S. Iron transport and homeostasis in plants: Current updates and applications for improving human nutrition values and sustainable agriculture. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 100, 373–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleem, A.; Zulfiqar, A.; Saleem, M.; Ali, B.; Saleem, M.; Ali, S.; Tufekci, E.; Tufekci, A.; Rahimi, M.; Mostafa, R. Alkaline and acidic soil constraints on iron accumulation by Rice cultivars in relation to several physio-biochemical parameters. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, N.; Wang, T.; Chen, Y.; Wang, M.; Lu, Q.; Wang, K.; Dou, Z.; Chi, Z.; Qiu, W.; Dai, J.; et al. Microbiome convergence enables siderophore-secreting-rhizobacteria to improve iron nutrition and yield of peanut intercropped with maize. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vishnu; Sharma, P.; Kaur, J.; Gosal, S.; Walia, S. Characterization of Sulfur Oxidizing Bacteria and Their Effect on Growth Promotion of Brassica napus L. J. Basic Microbiol. 2024, 64, e2400239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Hou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z. Enhancement of sulfur conversion rate in the production of L-cysteine by engineered Escherichia coli. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 68, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harwood, C.; Mouillon, J.-M.; Pohl, S.; Arnau, J. Secondary metabolite production and the safety of industrially important members of the Bacillus subtilis group. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 42, 721–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nøhr-Meldgaard, K.; Struve, C.; Ingmer, H.; Agersø, Y. Intrinsic tet(L) sub-class in Bacillus velezensis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens is associated with a reduced susceptibility toward tetracycline. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 966016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chebotar, V.; Myskova, A.; Khudyaeva, M.; Keleinikova, O.; Baganova, M.; Zaplatkin, A.; Pishchik, V.; Chizhevskaya, E. Draft genome sequence and analysis of endophyte Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain Can02R isolated from the roots of Chenopodium album L. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2025, 14, e01075-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, B.; Wang, C.; Song, X.; Ding, X.; Wu, L.; Wu, H.; Gao, X.; Borriss, R. Bacillus velezensis FZB42 in 2018: The Gram-Positive Model Strain for Plant Growth Promotion and Biocontrol. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumavath, R.; Gupta, P.; Tatta, E.R.; Mohan, M.S.; Salim, S.A. Unraveling the Role of Mobile Genetic Elements in Antibiotic Resistance Transmission and Defense Strategies in Bacteria. Front. Syst. Biol. 2025, 5, 1557413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, X.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Wei, R.; Wang, R.; He, T. Livestock Probiotics in China: Quality Analysis and Enterococcus-Associated Antibiotic Resistance Dissemination Risks. Engineering 2025, 55, 241–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petjul, K.; Kan-A-Roon, N.; Khunsanit, P.; Kollboon, U.; Boonmee, T. Evaluation of enzymatic activity, hemolytic safety, and antibiotic susceptibility of Bacillus spp. isolated from giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) farms in Kalasin Province, Thailand. Vet. World 2025, 18, 3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, G.; Xia, L.; Dong, X.; Li, Q.; Liles, M.; Shao, J.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, R. A genomic island in a plant beneficial rhizobacterium encodes novel antimicrobial fatty acids and a self-protection shield to enhance its competition. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 21, 3455–3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Y.; Zhou, C.; Qiu, F.; Peng, D.; Wang, X.; Li, X. Acid-resistant Bacillus velezensis effectively controls pathogenic Colletotrichum capsici and improves plant health through metabolic interactions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2025, 91, e00340-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jian, Z.; Zeng, L.; Xu, T.; Sun, S.; Yan, S.; Yang, L.; Huang, Y.; Jia, J.; Dou, T. Antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria: Occurrence, spread, and control. J. Basic Microbiol. 2021, 61, 1049–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]










| Cluster ID | Nucleotide Length (bp) | Gene Cluster Type | Most Similar Known Cluster | Similarity Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65,411 | NRPS | surfactin | High |
| 2 | 22,598 | lanthipeptide-class-iii | ||
| 3 | 41,245 | PKS-like | butirosin A/butirosin B | |
| 4 | 20,744 | terpene | ||
| 5 | 110,124 | NRPS, T3PKS, transAT-PKS | bacillaene | High |
| 6 | 110,422 | NRPS, betalactone, transAT-PKS | fengycin | High |
| 7 | 21,884 | terpene | ||
| 8 | 41,101 | T3PKS | ||
| 9 | 20,891 | terpene-precursor | ||
| 10 | 45,529 | NRPS | ||
| 11 | 65,250 | NRP-metallophore, NRPS, RiPP-like, terpene-precursor | bacillibactin | High |
| 12 | 41,419 | other | bacilysin | High |
| Treatment | CK | NB | T1 | T2 | T3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germinationrate/% | 50.00 ± 17.32 a | 33.33 ± 15.28 b | 60.00 ± 17.32 a | 53.33 ± 15.28 a | 40.00 ± 10.00 b |
| Rootlength/cm | 7.97 ± 2.66 b | 0.46 ± 0.24 c | 5.56 ± 1.20 b | 7.77 ± 2.57 b | 10.10 ± 3.19 a |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Jia, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Pei, W.; Pu, T.; Shi, Z.; He, F.; Yang, P. Multifunctional Bioactivity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SH-53: Analysis of Multiple Antagonistic and Synergistic Growth Promotion Mechanisms Based on Whole Genome. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2026, 48, 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48020193
Jia J, Wang Y, Liu X, Pei W, Pu T, Shi Z, He F, Yang P. Multifunctional Bioactivity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SH-53: Analysis of Multiple Antagonistic and Synergistic Growth Promotion Mechanisms Based on Whole Genome. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2026; 48(2):193. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48020193
Chicago/Turabian StyleJia, Jianpeng, Yu Wang, Xin Liu, Weihua Pei, Te Pu, Zhufeng Shi, Feifei He, and Peiwen Yang. 2026. "Multifunctional Bioactivity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SH-53: Analysis of Multiple Antagonistic and Synergistic Growth Promotion Mechanisms Based on Whole Genome" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 48, no. 2: 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48020193
APA StyleJia, J., Wang, Y., Liu, X., Pei, W., Pu, T., Shi, Z., He, F., & Yang, P. (2026). Multifunctional Bioactivity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SH-53: Analysis of Multiple Antagonistic and Synergistic Growth Promotion Mechanisms Based on Whole Genome. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 48(2), 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48020193
