Next Article in Journal
Reply to Lago, T.R.; Bolognani, F. Comment on “Nazarloo et al. Oxytocin, Vasopressin and Stress: A Hormetic Perspective. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 632”
Previous Article in Journal
Generation of an Insecticidal Human Domain Antibody from a Phage Library Targeting Plutella xylostella Brush-Border Membrane Vesicles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multifunctional Bioactivity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SH-53: Analysis of Multiple Antagonistic and Synergistic Growth Promotion Mechanisms Based on Whole Genome

1
School of Agriculture, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
2
Institute of Agricultural Environment and Resources, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650204, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2026, 48(2), 193; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48020193
Submission received: 28 December 2025 / Revised: 27 January 2026 / Accepted: 4 February 2026 / Published: 9 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology)

Abstract

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens is an important agricultural microbial resource. This study focuses on the whole genome analysis and functional characterization of B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53, isolated from the Wuliang Mountain National Nature Reserve in Dali, Yunnan. The genomic feature analysis revealed that the genome of SH-53 contains 27 ribosomal RNA operons, 4078 protein-coding genes, and 250 prophage-related genes. Additionally, 12 biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) for secondary metabolites were predicted, of which 7 are novel gene clusters with unknown functions, showing significant differences compared to the known BGCs of conventional biocontrol strains. Functional potential analysis indicates that SH-53 possesses potential antagonistic activity against plant pathogenic bacteria and can colonize the plant rhizosphere through various mechanisms to exert growth-promoting effects. It is capable of synthesizing multiple antibacterial secondary metabolites, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), iron carriers, secreting amylase, and efficiently utilizing sulfur sources. The genome also harbors a complete core gene network related to the induced systemic resistance (ISR) and supporting genes that maintain secondary metabolism homeostasis. In conclusion, B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53 exhibits rich biocontrol-related characteristics and unique secondary metabolic potential, indicating promising prospects for its development as an excellent biocontrol agent.

1. Introduction

In recent years, advances in agricultural microbiology have propelled B. amyloliquefaciens to the forefront of research, primarily due to its exceptional biocontrol potential in supporting sustainable plant disease management [1,2]. However, existing studies have largely focused on a limited number of model strains and those isolated from conventional agricultural environments, resulting in a limited understanding of the genomic features and metabolic potentials of strains derived from unique ecosystems [3]. B. amyloliquefaciens has application value beyond agricultural biocontrol, showing great potential in livestock farming. With stricter global restrictions on antibiotics as feed additives, its probiotic strains—endowed with stress resistance and functionality—have become ideal alternatives [4], as they can colonize livestock and poultry gastrointestinal tracts, secrete hydrolytic enzymes to improve feed conversion efficiency, and regulate intestinal microbial balance to boost immunity [5]. Special ecological niche strains, adapted to unique environmental stresses, outperform conventional strains in stress resistance genetic diversity, enzyme activity, and metabolic product novelty [6], offering new breakthroughs for efficient multifunctional microbial preparations. Additionally, as an agricultural microorganism with biocontrol and growth-promoting functions, it is extensively applied in root-knot nematode control, achieving this dual effect by secreting lipopeptides, and egg hatching, while also triggering plants to activate induced systemic resistance, which reinforces their intrinsic defense mechanisms against nematode infestation [7].
Under the influence of distinctive environmental selection pressures, specialized ecological niches often serve as important sources for novel metabolic pathways and ecological functions through evolution [8,9]. The Wuliang Mountain National Nature Reserve in Dali, Yunnan, as an ecological hotspot with a typical vertical climate zone and high biodiversity, presents a unique opportunity to systematically explore its microbial resource pool, unveiling functional strains that are both novel and efficient.
This study isolates B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53 from the Wuliangshan National Nature Reserve and aims to reveal its potentially evolved unique genetic and functional characteristics. Early research on B. amyloliquefaciens primarily focused on the isolation, identification, and mechanism analysis of core antifungal lipopeptides, such as iturin, fengycin, and surfactin [10]. With the advancement of genomic technologies, research has progressed from phenotypic studies to genotypic analyses, enabling the precise elucidation of the biosynthetic gene clusters, regulatory networks, and secretion mechanisms of key metabolites [11,12]. Current research indicates that the biocontrol efficacy of B. amyloliquefaciens is driven by a synergistic network composed of various secondary metabolites, including lipopeptides, polyene compounds, and bacteriocins [13,14]. For instance, Surfactin, a lipopeptide metabolite of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, can enhance the membrane permeability of target pathogenic cells, thereby promoting the penetration and biocontrol activity of iturin., while iron carriers inhibit pathogen growth through nutritional competition. This synergistic multi-component, multi-target model is key to achieving efficient pest and disease control [15,16].
Therefore, this study aims to conduct a comprehensive whole-genome analysis and functional validation of B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53, isolated from the special ecological niche of the Wuliangshan National Nature Reserve in Dali, Yunnan. By integrating bioinformatics analyses with physiological and biochemical experiments, the study systematically elucidates the mechanisms by which SH-53 promotes plant growth. Furthermore, from the perspective of “genomic analysis + functional validation”, this research seeks to explore the genetic basis and application potential of SH-53 as a microbial inoculant in greater depth.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Genomic Sequencing and Annotation of Strain SH-53

Using the Whole Genome Shotgun (WGS) strategy, libraries with different insert fragment lengths were constructed, and sequencing was performed using a combination of second-generation and third-generation sequencing technologies. Specifically, short reads were generated using the Illumina NovaSeq platform (2 × 150 bp paired-end reads), while long reads were obtained using the PacBio Sequel platform. After quality control of the sequencing data, genome assembly was performed with software tools such as HiFiasm, Unicycler, and Flye. Additionally, the Pilon software version 1.24 software was utilized to correct the contigs obtained from third-generation sequencing using high-quality short reads from Illumina, ultimately yielding a complete and high-quality genome sequence. Following the assembly of the genome, repeat sequences within the genome were predicted de novo using RepeatModeler (v1.0.8) and RepeatMasker (v4.0.5). For functional annotation of protein-coding genes, systematic comparisons were conducted with public databases, including the NCBI non-redundant protein database (NR), eggNOG, KEGG, Swiss-Prot, Gene Ontology (GO), Pfam, the Carbohydrate Active Enzymes database (CAZy), and the Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD).

2.2. Prediction of NP-BGCs in Strain SH-53 Genome

The BGCs within the genome of strain SH-53 were identified and analyzed using antiSMASH version 8.0.4. This tool facilitated the prediction of the structural formulas of secondary metabolites encoded by the identified gene clusters [17].

2.3. Evaluation of Strain Bioactivity and Seed Germination Promotion

2.3.1. Detection of IAA Production Capability

Qualitative Analysis of IAA Production
To assess the IAA production capability of strain SH-53 qualitatively, a single colony was picked and inoculated into KB medium (containing 20.0 g/L peptone, 1.5 g/L dipotassium hydrogen phosphate (K2HPO4·H2O), 1.5 g/L magnesium sulfate (MgSO4·7H2O), 15.0 mL/L glycerol, and 1 g/L L-Tryptophan). The culture was incubated at 30 °C with shaking at 180 rpm for 24 h under sterile conditions. After incubation, 1 mL of the fermentation broth was taken into a centrifuge tube and rapidly mixed with 4 mL of Sackowcki’s color reagent. The mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature in the dark for 40 min to develop color. The color change was then observed and recorded; a pink coloration indicated a positive result, confirming that the strain was capable of secreting IAA.
Quantitation
Standard Curve Preparation: Weigh 10 mg of IAA standard and dissolve it in a small volume of ethanol. Dilute the solution to 100 mL with distilled water to obtain a stock solution with a concentration of 100 μg/mL. Perform gradient dilution to prepare a series of standard solutions with concentrations of 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 μg/mL (note: the original “24 g/mL” is corrected to μg/mL to conform to experimental logic). Pipette 1 mL of each standard solution, add 4 mL of color reagent, and incubate the mixture at 30 °C in the dark for 40 min to allow color development. Measure the absorbance value at OD535 using a spectrophotometer, and plot the standard curve with IAA concentration as the abscissa and OD535 value as the ordinate.
Assay Method: Prepare 100 mL of King’s B (KB) medium. Inoculate the nutrient broth (NB) medium (containing 10 g/L peptone, 3 g/L beef extract, 5 g/L NaCl, pH 7.0) with 1% (v/v) of bacterial suspension with a calibrated OD600 value. After incubation for 1 day, centrifuge both the bacterial suspension and the blank control at 12,500 r·min−1 for 10 min. Collect 4 mL of the supernatant, add an equal volume (4 mL) of Sackowcki’s color reagent, and incubate the mixture in the dark for 40 min. Zero the spectrophotometer with the blank colorimetric solution, then measure the OD535 value of each sample. Each treatment is replicated three times to ensure accuracy. Conduct continuous determination for 7 days, record the color changes at different fermentation time points, and calculate the IAA yield of the strain at each time point by referring to the prepared standard curve.

2.3.2. Detection of Siderophore Production Capability of Strains

An amount of 200 µL of spore suspension with a concentration of 1 × 106/mL to 2 × 106/mL was added to 200 mL of iron-free Czapek liquid medium. The flask containing the medium (500 mL) was then placed on a shaking incubator (model: HS-200B) at 30 °C and 150 r·min−1 for 48 h. After cultivation, 2–5 mL of the culture was removed, filtered through a 0.22 µm sterile filter membrane, and mixed with an equal volume of CAS (Chrome Azurol S) detection solution. After standing for 1 h, the OD630 was measured using a full-wavelength microplate reader (model: MultiskaGO), recorded as “As”. The OD630 of the un-inoculated liquid medium was measured using the same method as a reference value, recorded as “Ar”. The concentration of siderophores was expressed in siderophore units (SU), calculated as SU = [(Ar − As)/Ar] × 100%. Measurements were repeated three times, and the average value was used for comparative analysis.

2.3.3. Physiological and Biochemical Experiments of Strain

To ensure the reproducibility of the experiments, all culture media and related reagents used in this study were purchased from Qingdao Haibo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China).
The physiological and biochemical experiments were performed on the strain SH-53, including hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production test, hemolysis assay, and antibiotic susceptibility test, with each experiment conducted in triplicate.
H2S Production Test: LB solid medium was prepared (10 g/L tryptophan, 5 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L NaCl), and sterilized under high pressure at 121 °C. After cooling to approximately 50 °C, a mixed solution of 1 mL of 10% (w/v) sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3) and 1% (w/v) lead acetate (Pb(CH3COO)2), both filtered through a 0.22 µm filter membrane for sterilization, was added per 100 mL of medium. The mixture was quickly stirred and poured into Petri dishes. Pure colonies of strain SH-53 were picked with a sterile toothpick and inserted vertically into the depths of the medium. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 24 h, and the color change of the medium was observed.
Starch Hydrolysis Test: Strain SH-53 was inoculated onto starch agar plates and incubated at 30 °C for 48 h. A suitable amount of Lugol’s iodine solution (components: 5.0 g iodine, 10.0 g potassium iodide, made up to 100 mL with distilled water) was then poured over the surface of the plates with colonies. After standing for 1 min, the results were observed.
Hemolysis Assay: A solid LB medium containing 5% (v/v) defibrinated sheep blood was prepared. After autoclaving, the medium was cooled to approximately 50 °C, and defibrinated sheep blood was added under sterile conditions, mixed thoroughly, and poured into Petri dishes to set. Subsequently, a sterile inoculating loop was used to pick a single colony of purified SH-53 for streak inoculation onto the surface of the blood agar plates. The plates were then incubated in an inverted position in a constant temperature incubator at 30 °C for 48–72 h. After the incubation period, the appearance of a clear hemolytic zone (β-hemolysis) or a greenish hemolytic zone (α-hemolysis) around the colony was observed. The presence of a clear zone indicated that the strain exhibited hemolytic activity.
Antibiotic Susceptibility Test: A total of 300 μL of the bacterial culture was evenly spread on NA plates. Once the plates dried, antibiotic sensitivity paper discs (Erythromycin, Gentamicin, Streptomycin, Tetracycline, Vancomycin, Chloramphenicol, Ciprofloxacin, Subactam, Cefotaxime Sodium, and Cefuroxime) were placed in the center of the plates. The plates were then incubated in the dark at 30 °C for 24 h. The results were analyzed based on the presence of a clear inhibition zone around the discs, indicating the strain’s sensitivity to the respective antibiotics; the absence of an inhibition zone indicated resistance to the antibiotics tested.

2.3.4. Seed Germination Experiment of Strain SH-53

Pure colonies of strain SH-53 preserved on slants were inoculated into 100 mL of NB liquid medium and shaken at 30 °C and 180 r·min−1 for 24 h. When the OD600 reached approximately 1, this was considered the seed liquid of SH-53. Fermentation was carried out according to the previously optimized formula and culture conditions (sucrose 15.00 g/L, sodium nitrate 15.00 g/L, disodium hydrogen phosphate 5.25 g/L, yeast extract 5.00 g/L, pH 7.5, temperature 30 °C, shaking speed 200 r·min−1, with a liquid volume of 200 mL for 24 h) to obtain the fermentation broth of strain SH-53. A blank control group was set up with 2 mL of sterile water, a negative control group with 2 mL of NB liquid medium, treatment group T1 with 2 mL of undiluted fermentation broth, treatment group T2 with 2 mL of 10-fold diluted fermentation broth, and treatment group T3 with 2 mL of 100-fold diluted fermentation broth. Each treatment was repeated three times, and 10 tomato seeds were placed in each plate. The plates were incubated in the dark at 30 °C for 7 days to observe the seed germination status.

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of Genetic Information and Gene Structure Characteristics of the Strain Based on Whole Genome Sequencing

Based on phylogenetic analysis using the universal 16S rRNA primer, the strain SH-53 was subjected to NCBI Blastn search and compared with related species gene sequences in the GenBank database. The results indicated that strain SH-53 belongs to the genus Bacillus, and it resides within the same independent branch as B. amyloliquefaciens DSM7 (Figure 1).
Based on the analysis of Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) and digital DNA-DNA Hybridization (dDDH), the ANI value between strain SH-53 and B. amyloliquefaciens DSM7 was as high as 99.95%, while the dDDH value was 100%. These values are significantly above the recognized thresholds for prokaryotic species delineation (ANI ≥ 95–96%, dDDH ≥ 70%). This result clearly indicates that strain SH-53 should be classified as B. amyloliquefaciens (Table S1). Furthermore, multi-locus sequence analysis (MLSA) revealed that strain SH-53 is most closely related to B. amyloliquefaciens DSM7 (Table S2).

3.2. Exploration of Bioactivity and Mechanism Analysis Based on Whole Genome Sequencing

The whole genome sequencing results of B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53 (Figure 2) show that its chromosome length is 4,007,020 bp, with a GC content of 45.99% and encoding 4078 genes. The average length of the coding genes is 864.68 bp, and the chromosome contains 27 rRNA, 87 tRNA, 83 sRNA, and 11 genomic islands encoding a total of 446 genes. These data provide a critical foundation for further investigation of the bioactivity of this strain and its corresponding mechanisms of action.

3.3. Gene Annotation Results

Using the NCBI nr, KEGG, Swiss Prot, GO, COG, TCDB, Pfam, CAZy, and CARD databases, the predicted gene protein sequences were compared with various functional databases using Diamond (E-value ≤ 1 × 10−5). The highest scoring results were selected for annotation (with default identity ≥ 40% and coverage ≥ 40%). The final annotation statistics are shown in Figure 3. A significant number of genes had functional annotations in the NCBI nr, Swiss Prot, Pfam, COG, GO, and KEGG databases, totaling 4076, 3655, 3504, 3155, 2410, and 2875, respectively, which accounts for 99.95%, 89.63%, 85.92%, 77.37%, 59.10%, and 53.21% of the total genes. In the CAZy database, a total of 133 genes were annotated, representing 3.26%. In the TCDB database, 775 genes were annotated, accounting for 19.00%, and in the CARD database, 163 genes were annotated, making up 4.00% of the total gene count.

3.3.1. Analysis Results of COG Database Genes in Strain SH-53

The proteins of B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53 were annotated using the COG database. Figure 4 displays the classification results of the 3155 genes annotated in strain SH-53 according to COG. The most abundant category was amino acid transport and metabolism, with a total of 320 genes, accounting for 10.14% of the annotated genes. This was followed by transcription, which included 302 genes, representing 9.57% of the annotated genes. Other categories that received annotation include carbohydrate transport and metabolism (263 genes, 8.34%), translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (232 genes, 7.35%), cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis (213 genes, 6.75%), and signal transduction mechanisms (198 genes, 6.28%).
Additionally, 153 genes (accounting for 4.85%) were identified to have unknown functions, warranting further investigation. Among the 23 subcategories, aside from the functionally unknown genes (S, 4.31%), those belonging to amino acid transport and metabolism (E, 9.02%), transcription (K, 8.52%), carbohydrate transport and metabolism (G, 7.42%), general function prediction (R, 7.16%), and translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (J, 6.54%) also exhibited significant abundance. This reveals potential advantages of the strain in metabolic processes, environmental adaptation, and competitive survival.

3.3.2. Gene Analysis Results of Strain SH-53 in the GO Database

Using the GO database, a total of 2410 genes from strain SH-53 were annotated, accounting for 59.10% of the total annotated genes. This database classifies all annotated genes into three categories (Figure 5), with some genes appearing in multiple classifications. The genes relate to cellular components (1227 genes, 28.00%), molecular functions (1890 genes, 43.13%), and biological processes (1265 genes, 28.87%), allowing for overlap among the categories. In the cellular component functional annotation, 1227 genes were successfully annotated, with membrane-related genes being the most abundant, exceeding 400 in number (specifically 441 genes). Additionally, 333 genes closely associated with the plasma membrane and 310 genes associated with the cytoplasm were effectively annotated. In the biological process functional annotation, a total of 1265 genes were annotated, with phosphorylation processes representing the largest number of annotated biological processes within this category. For molecular function annotations, a total of 1890 genes received annotations, with ATP binding activity identified as a core annotated entry within this category.

3.3.3. Results of KEGG Database Gene Analysis of Strain SH-53

The KEGG annotation database is organized into six primary categories: cellular processes, environmental information processing, genetic information processing, human diseases, metabolism, and biological systems. Among these categories, the metabolism section contained the most extensive information, encompassing a total of 2875 annotated genes (as illustrated in Figure 6). Notably, when genes were simultaneously annotated across multiple categories, the metabolism category represented the highest proportion, accounting for 2170 genes (69.84%). This finding aligns closely with the annotation results derived from the COG database.
Excluding the 842 genes assigned to the global and overview maps category, the top three subcategories within the six major categories were carbohydrate metabolism (269 genes, 8.66%), amino acid metabolism (233 genes, 7.50%), and the metabolism of cofactors and vitamins (214 genes, 6.89%). These results largely correspond with the findings from the GO and COG databases, indicating that the strain demonstrates a robust capacity for environmental adaptability and competitive nutrient acquisition. This insight underscores the strain’s significant biological value, particularly in industrial applications and host-microbe interactions.

3.3.4. Annotation of Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes in Strain SH-53

The carbohydrate-active enzymes in strain SH-53 were classified into six main categories: accessory activities, carbohydrate-binding modules, carbohydrate esterases, glycoside hydrolases, glycosyltransferases, and polysaccharide lyases. Among these, the genes encoding glycosyltransferases were notably represented, with a total of 44 genes annotated in this category. The gene counts for the other five categories were as follows: accessory activities (10 genes), carbohydrate esterases (4 genes), glycoside hydrolases (31 genes), glycosyltransferases (44 genes), and polysaccharide lyases (4 genes), as depicted in Figure 7. This distribution indicates a diverse enzymatic toolkit related to carbohydrate metabolism, which may play a crucial role in the strain’s functionality and potential applications.
Further analysis revealed that the genome of strain SH-53 contains multiple key genes involved in the starch degradation pathway, aligning closely with the high proportion of glycoside hydrolases found in its CAZyme annotations. For instance, the amyA gene encodes a precursor form of α-amylase (1,4-α-D-glucan glucanohydrolase), an enzyme that directly hydrolyzes the α-1,4-glycosidic bonds in starch, making it a core enzyme in the initial stages of starch degradation. Additionally, the malL and malZ genes encode highly conserved α-glucosidases that further hydrolyze the oligosaccharides (such as maltose) produced from starch degradation into glucose, providing the strain with a readily available carbon source. This enzymatic capability enhances strain SH-53’s potential for efficient starch utilization and suggests its application in processes involving carbohydrate metabolism.
It is noteworthy that this strain also contains genes such as sacA and sacC, which encode proteins from glycoside hydrolase family 32 and sucrose-6-phosphate hydrolase, respectively. These enzymes are capable of catalyzing the hydrolysis of sucrose and its derivatives, effectively breaking down sucrose-6-phosphate into glucose-6-phosphate and fructose. This functionality not only broadens the carbon source utilization range of SH-53, allowing it to utilize disaccharides like sucrose, but also corroborates the starch degradation capabilities observed in experiments (Figure 7). Considering both the CAZyme annotations and the functional analysis of key genes, it is evident that SH-53 possesses a diverse carbohydrate metabolism capacity. Its genetic basis for enzyme production highlights its significant potential, particularly in the degradation and utilization of starch and sucrose. This enzymatic versatility enhances the strain’s applicability in various industrial and biotechnological processes involving carbohydrate substrates.

3.3.5. Prediction of NP BGCs in the Genome of Strain SH-53

Using the antiSMASH v8.0.4 bioinformatics analysis platform, we predicted secondary metabolite BGCs in the whole genome sequence of B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53. A total of 12 potential secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters were identified (Table 1), and their genomic localization is illustrated in Figure 8. These clusters include 3 types of terpenes, 3 types of transAT-PKS, 1 type of lanthipeptide III, 2 types of NRPS, and 2 types of PKS. Among these gene clusters, 5 showed high similarity to known compound gene clusters, namely surfactin, bacillaene, fengycin, bacillibactin, and bacilysin, as depicted in the biosynthetic gene cluster map shown in Figure S1. The remaining 7 gene clusters did not find homologous gene clusters, which may provide potential metabolic reserves for the strain to cope with various stress pressures in complex environments, thereby allowing it to better adapt to different ecological environments and exert biocontrol functions. Preliminary antagonistic experiments indicated that strain SH-53 exhibited good inhibitory effects against various plant pathogenic bacteria [18]. The secondary metabolite prediction results based on the genome in this study well explain this phenotype. We speculate that its broad-spectrum antagonistic ability against pathogens is not reliant on a single mechanism but is rather the result of the synergistic action of various metabolites, including these lipopeptides (NRPS/PKS), bacteriocins (lanthipeptides), and siderophores. These abundant BGCs provide a significant metabolic potential for competing for nutrients, occupying ecological niches, and efficiently performing biocontrol functions in complex rhizosphere environments.

3.3.6. Gene Analysis of ISR in the Strain

Based on the annotation results from the KEGG database, we further annotated the ISR genes (Table S3). The results showed that the genome of B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53 contains a series of genes associated with plant root colonization and biofilm formation. The genome includes a variety of core genes related to ISR, such as lipopeptide antibiotic synthesis genes (ppsD, ppsE, ituA, ituB, ituC, licA, licB, licC), antimicrobial peptide (bacteriocin) synthesis and transport genes (bacG, bacF, bacE, bacD), as well as quorum sensing and regulation genes (luxS, ahlD, comA, slrR). Additionally, we identified many genes associated with iron nutrition competition, including siderophore synthesis genes (entC, entE) and siderophore transport genes (fecE, fhuA, efeO). These genes can inhibit pathogen growth by chelating soil iron ions, thereby indirectly enhancing plant disease resistance. The genome also contains genes responsible for synthesizing volatile ISR signal molecules (butB, acoA, acoB) as well as metabolic support genes that maintain secondary metabolite homeostasis (murA, atpA, talB, amyA). Therefore, B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53 can enhance plant immunity and induce systemic resistance through the synergistic action of multiple types of signaling molecules, while exhibiting excellent biocontrol potential.

3.3.7. Hemolytic Activity Analysis of Strain SH-53

The results of whole-genome annotation analysis indicated that no genes related to the synthesis or regulation of hemolysins were detected in the genome of strain SH-53, and there was no annotation information for hemolysis-related functional genes. Furthermore, in conjunction with the hemolysis plate experiment, no hemolytic zones were observed around the colonies cultured on blood agar plates (Figure S5D), providing further evidence that strain SH-53 does not exhibit hemolytic activity.

3.3.8. Antibiotic Resistance Analysis of Strain SH-53 (CARD)

The genome of strain SH-53 was compared with the CARD database, resulting in the identification of 268 resistance genes (Table S4). The specific classification of these resistance genes is illustrated in Figure 9. Among these, the proportion of resistance genes was relatively high for peptide antibiotics (11.51%), tetracycline antibiotics (9.59%), macrolide antibiotics (8.63%), fluoroquinolone antibiotics (6.95%), penicillins (6.71%), and disinfectants and preservatives (6.24%). The results of the antibiotic susceptibility plate assay indicated that the strain SH-53 exhibited good sensitivity to a variety of antibiotics, including peptides, tetracyclines, and macrolides, which correspond to the high prevalence of resistant genes. No resistant phenotypes were observed (Figure S6).

3.4. Evaluation of Biological Activity and Seed Germination Promotion by Strain SH-53

3.4.1. Evaluation of Biological Activity of Strain SH-53

The KEGG database annotation results indicate that strain SH-53 possesses multiple potentials for plant growth promotion, including the secretion of IAA, production of hydrogen sulfide (H2S), phosphate transport and assimilation, and synthesis of siderophores. Previous studies have also demonstrated that the strain exhibits biological activities such as amylase production and nitrogen fixation [14].
A complete set of tryptophan (IAA precursor) biosynthesis genes, trpABCDEFG, was identified in the genome of strain SH-53, indicating that it can autonomously synthesize IAA precursors without the need for exogenous tryptophan, possessing a complete biosynthetic pathway (Figure S3). Additionally, key genes related to the indole-3-pyruvic acid (IPA) pathway, including ipdC (which encodes indole-3-pyruvic acid decarboxylase, EC:4.1.1.74) and aldehyde dehydrogenase genes (EC:1.2.1.3), as well as genes in the indole-3-acetamide (IAM) pathway, such as amiE (amidase, EC:3.5.1.4) and iaaH (indole-3-acetamide hydrolase, EC:3.5.1) were also identified in the genome (Table S5). This suggests that strain SH-53 may efficiently synthesize IAA through multiple pathways. Functional screening experiments further confirmed the ability of strain SH-53 to produce IAA (Figure S5A).
Strain SH-53 exhibits a significant ability to secrete siderophores. Qualitative detection using the CAS plate method demonstrated that the color of the reaction system changed from blue to orange-red upon inoculation with this strain (Figure S5B), confirming its capability to secrete siderophores. Quantitative analysis revealed that the siderophore activity unit (SU) reached as high as 94.95% ± 0.07%, indicating a strong ability for siderophore secretion.
The genome of strain SH-53 contains two complete gene clusters involved in siderophore biosynthesis: the entABCEF and dhbBEF clusters (Table S6). These clusters are responsible for encoding non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS) and modifying enzymes required for the synthesis of two efficient iron chelators, enterobactin and bacillibactin. Moreover, a complete catechol-type siderophore synthesis pathway was annotated (Figure S4). These catechol-type siderophores exhibit a high affinity for trivalent iron ions (Fe3+), enabling them to effectively capture trace amounts of iron in the environment.
Analysis of the genome of B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53 indicates that it has a complete genetic basis for sulfur metabolism. This strain contains multiple sets of 14 key genes involved in the utilization of different sulfur sources. Notably, the sat-cysC-cysH-cysJ gene cluster constitutes the sulfate assimilation pathway, responsible for the stepwise reduction of inorganic sulfate (SO42−) to hydrogen sulfide (H2S), which is subsequently used for the synthesis of sulfur-containing organic compounds such as cysteine. The cysE-cysK genes encode key enzymes in the cysteine synthesis pathway, catalyzing the reaction between hydrogen sulfide and O-acetylserine to form cysteine. Additionally, the ssuABCD gene cluster encodes a complete sulfonate transport and oxidation system, allowing the strain to utilize organic sulfonates as alternative sulfur sources. Genes such as metA and mccB are involved in methionine synthesis and sulfur cycle regulation. The presence of soxC suggests that the strain may participate in sulfur oxidation processes (Table S7). Collectively, these sulfur metabolism-related genes enhance the adaptability and competitive capacity of SH-53 in fluctuating sulfur environments in the rhizosphere. Functional screening experiments also confirmed the ability of strain SH-53 to produce hydrogen sulfide (Figure S5C).
Analysis of the genome of B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53 demonstrates that it possesses a genetic basis for the efficient utilization of various inorganic nitrogen sources. This strain contains a complete nitrate reduction system, composed of genes such as narGHI, nasADE, and narK (Table S8), which enables the stepwise reduction of nitrate (NO3) to ammonium (NH4+) in the environment. In addition, SH-53 has a complete ammonium assimilation pathway with genes including glnA, gltBD, and gudB, allowing for the efficient incorporation of ammonium into amino acid metabolism. Together, these nitrogen metabolism-related genes enhance the adaptability and competitive capability of SH-53 in fluctuating nitrogen environments in the rhizosphere. This genetic foundation not only supports the strain’s growth but also contributes to its potential role in promoting plant growth by improving nitrogen availability.
The analysis of the starchase in the genome of strain SH-53 indicates its genetic potential to utilize complex carbohydrates present in the environment. This strain contains multiple sets of 7 key genes involved in the degradation of starch and glycogen. Among them, the amyA gene, which encodes a typical α-amylase, is responsible for the initial hydrolysis of starch, and its products are further degraded into glucose by the α-glucosidases encoded by malL and malZ. Meanwhile, the treC and sacA genes handle products from other carbohydrate metabolic pathways by hydrolyzing trehalose-6-phosphate and sucrose-6-phosphate, respectively, thereby providing accessible carbon sources and energy for the cells (Table S9). Preliminary experiments have also confirmed the amylase production capability of strain SH-53.
The genome of strain SH-53 contains genes involved in phosphate transport and assimilation, such as phoA and phoD, which are capable of hydrolyzing various organic phosphonates in the environment, decomposing them, and releasing accessible inorganic phosphate. Additionally, genes like pstS, pstA, pstC, and pstB have been annotated, representing a complete high-affinity phosphate-specific ABC transport system that efficiently uptake trace amounts of inorganic phosphate from the environment under phosphate-limiting conditions. Furthermore, the two-component regulatory system gene phoR encodes a histidine kinase that initiates the phosphate stress response under phosphorus deficiency, upregulating the expression of related genes such as the aforementioned alkaline phosphatases (phoA/phoD) and the phosphate transport system (pstSCAB). This adaptation allows the strain to respond effectively to phosphate-limited environments (Table S10).

3.4.2. Determination of Seed Germination-Promoting Traits of Strain SH-53

Previous research has confirmed that strain SH-53 possesses biofilm formation and root colonization abilities [19]; however, it remains unclear whether this strain influences seed germination during the early stages. Therefore, this study conducted qualitative tests on plant growth-promoting (PGP) bioactivity. The experimental results indicate that strain SH-53 has a strong capacity to promote seed germination. Under treatment with the undiluted fermentation broth of strain SH-53 (T1), the germination rate of tomato seeds reached a maximum of 60.00%, which is an increase of 10% compared to the blank control group (CK: 50.00%) (Table 2). The 100-fold diluted fermentation broth treatment group (T3) showed the best promoting effect on root length, with an increase of 21.09% compared to the control group (CK: 7.97 cm vs. T3: 10.10 cm) (Figure 10). These results demonstrate that strain SH-53 has a good ability to promote plant growth and possesses potential for further development as a plant growth promoter.

4. Discussion

This study reveals the significant biocontrol potential of SH-53 as a plant root-associated growth-promoting bacterium (PGPR) through whole-genome analysis. Notably, compared to other excellent biocontrol strains, SH-53 exhibits two extremely remarkable genomic features: First, it has as many as 27 ribosomal RNA operons (rRNA operons), which is much higher than the reference strains SQR9 (7), FZB42 (10), DSM7 (10), and B. subtilis 168 (10). The copy number of rRNA operons is directly related to the growth rate of bacteria, suggesting that SH-53 may possess the potential for rapid niche colonization [20]. Secondly, SH-53 contains 4078 protein-coding genes, which is on par with the recognized strong biocontrol strain SQR9 (4078) and significantly exceeds the number in FZB42 (3693) and DSM7 (3921). This indicates that SH-53 has similarly robust metabolic functions and secondary metabolite synthesis potential [21].
Additionally, the genome of SH-53 contains 250 prophage-related genes, a number comparable to the high levels found in B. subtilis 168 (268 genes) and SQR9 (218 genes), and significantly higher than that of FZB42 (44 genes). This suggests that the genome of SH-53 has undergone active horizontal gene transfer events, potentially endowing it with additional functional advantages, such as novel stress resistance or antibacterial genes [22,23].
Comparison of the core genomic structural data of the probiotic strains S2.5, marine-derived strain BTSS3, and endophytic biocontrol strain TNOB22 (see Table S11) reveals a high degree of uniformity in the shared characteristics of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens across the four strains, forming a core genetic basis. In terms of genome size, SH-53 (4.007 Mb), S2.5 (3.912 Mb), BTSS3 (4.09 Mb), and TNOB22 (3.86 Mb) cluster within the range of 3.8–4.2 Mb, reflecting genomic stability at the species level. The number of protein-coding genes in all strains falls within the range of 3800 to 4400, maintaining a consistent framework for core functional genes. Each strain contains 8–12 secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), including species-specific clusters such as surfactin and fengycin. Phage-related genes and rRNA operons are conserved genomic components that collectively support the basic survival and functional expression of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens [5,24,25].
Using SH-53 as a reference, the genomic structures of the other three strains show significant specific differentiation, reflecting differences in ecological niche adaptation. In terms of rRNA operon copy numbers, SH-53 exhibits 27 copies, far exceeding those of S2.5 (10 copies), BTSS3 (8 copies), and TNOB22 (7 copies), suggesting enhanced proliferation and colonization capabilities in the rhizosphere environment. The proportion of novel secondary metabolite BGCs in SH-53 (58.3%) is significantly higher than that of S2.5 (37.5%), BTSS3 (30%), and TNOB22 (25%), providing unique genetic resources for its broad-spectrum biocontrol functions. Regarding the quantity of phage-related genes, SH-53 (250 genes) has more than the other three strains, indicating a more active gene exchange in complex soil environments, while TNOB22 (97 genes) and S2.5 (128 genes) display lower copy numbers, indicating adaptation to stable ecological niches in plants and the intestinal tracts of livestock, respectively. These differences suggest that the core genome of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens is highly conserved, while strain-specific characteristics are driven by structural differences in rRNA operon copy numbers, proportions of novel BGCs, and phage-related gene quantities, resulting from adaptive evolution under different ecological niche selection pressures.
These results indicate that SH-53 not only possesses genetic coding potential comparable to that of top-performing biocontrol strains but also benefits from an exceptional competitive colonization advantage due to its high output of rRNA operons. These findings reveal, from a genomic perspective, the mechanisms by which this strain exerts its functions in biocontrol and plant growth promotion.
B. amyloliquefaciens, as an important representative of PGPR, is renowned for its exceptional ability to produce antibacterial substances and promote plant growth [26,27]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that this strain is effective in controlling various plant diseases. For instance, the strain FZB42 can effectively inhibit sheath blight in rice caused by Rhizoctonia solani [28] and gray mold in strawberries caused by Botrytis cinerea [29]. The strain SQR9 exhibits strong antagonistic effects against the pathogen Fusarium oxysporum responsible for cucumber wilt [30]. In addition, B. amyloliquefaciens can produce a variety of antibacterial substances, such as surfactin, iturin, and fengycin, which have been widely applied in agricultural production, showcasing its significant potential in biocontrol [21].
The biocontrol efficacy of B. amyloliquefaciens primarily arises from the secretion of various secondary metabolites. In the whole-genome analysis of the SH-53 strain, we identified a total of 12 BGCs for secondary metabolites, of which 5 were highly similar to known BGCs responsible for the synthesis of Surfactin, Bacillaene, Fengycin, Bacillibactin, and Bacilysin. Notably, an important finding is that the remaining 7 BGCs show very low similarity to known clusters, a characteristic that significantly distinguishes SH-53 from conventional biocontrol strains and likely reflects the adaptive evolution of SH-53 to its native environment in the unique ecological niche of the Wuliang Mountain Nature Reserve [31].
The enhancement of plant disease resistance relies not only on the direct suppression of pathogens by biocontrol bacteria but also on the “immune boosting effect” achieved through the induction of the plant’s own defense system (i.e., Induced Systemic Resistance, ISR). Based on functional annotation from the KEGG database (Supplementary Table S8), a systematic exploration of ISR-related genes in SH-53 revealed a complete ISR regulatory network within its genome. Core genes within this network interact to form a synergistic effect, providing dual guarantees for its biocontrol functions.
Within this network, the genes related to the synthesis of lipopeptide antibiotics (ppsD, ppsE, ituA-ituC, licA-licC) play a dual role as both “signal molecules and antimicrobial agents”. The synthesized compounds, such as fengycin and iturin, can not only directly disrupt the cell membrane structures of pathogens or inhibit their metabolism but also act as activating signals for plant ISR. They trigger defense pathways such as jasmonic acid and salicylic acid, thereby enhancing plant resistance against a broad spectrum of pathogens [32,33,34]. Meanwhile, the genes involved in the synthesis and transportation of antibacterial peptides (bacG, bacF, bacE, bacD) participate in the modification and extracellular secretion of bioactive products, reinforcing direct suppression of pathogens and enhancing the activation efficiency of the ISR pathway through signaling by metabolic products [33,35], establishing a dual action mode of “direct inhibition + immune enhancement”.
The presence of quorum sensing and regulatory genes provides a “precise regulatory mechanism” for this network: the AI-2 signaling molecule synthesized by the luxS gene mediates interspecies communication between SH-53 and root-associated microorganisms, helping the strain better adapt and colonize the rhizosphere microenvironment [36]. The ahlD gene can degrade the quorum sensing signaling molecules (AHLs) produced by pathogens, obstructing their collective behaviors (such as biofilm formation and virulence factor synthesis), thereby weakening their pathogenicity [37]. Additionally, the comA and slrR genes promote biofilm formation, enhancing SH-53’s colonization ability in plant roots and ensuring the continuous action of its metabolic products [38,39].
Furthermore, the existence of iron nutrition competition-related genes (entC, entE, fecE, fhuA, efeO) enables SH-53 to efficiently chelate iron ions in the rhizosphere, inhibiting pathogen proliferation by depriving them of essential nutrients for growth; simultaneously, the binding of iron carriers to plant roots can indirectly activate jasmonic acid-mediated disease-resistant pathways, further strengthening the plant’s inherent defenses [40,41,42]. Genes involved in the synthesis of volatile signaling molecules (butB, acoA, acoB) catalyze the production of compounds such as 2,3-butanediol and 2-phenylethanol, inducing plant defense responses at a distance. Moreover, the regulation of metabolic homeostasis of 2-phenylethanol by acoA and acoB ensures the sustained effectiveness of this signaling pathway [43,44].
These genes do not function in isolation but collaborate through intersecting metabolic pathways, forming a complete ISR regulatory network characterized by “signal recognition—defense activation—nutrient competition—colonization assurance”. The integrity and synergy of this network significantly enhance the biocontrol mechanisms of SH-53 compared to some conventional strains that rely solely on a single antimicrobial substance.
SH-53 also contains support genes that maintain the stability of secondary metabolism, including murA, atpA, talB, and amyA. Specifically, murA is responsible for the synthesis of the lipid peptidoglycan modification precursor [45]; atpA generates ATP to provide energy for the synthesis and secretion of signaling molecules [46]; talB participates in the pentose phosphate pathway, providing raw materials for nucleic acids and coenzymes [47]; and amyA degrades starch to serve as a carbon source, maintaining the carbon source balance necessary for the growth of the strain and secondary metabolism [48].
In the known metabolic products, the SH-53 strain retains a typical framework of antibacterial mechanisms: Bacilysin disrupts the synthesis of the pathogenic bacterial cell wall by inhibiting the GlmS enzyme [49]; Bacillaene effectively prevents the formation of biofilms by pathogenic bacteria [50]; Fengycin possesses a concentration-dependent dual action mechanism, inducing fungal apoptosis while also directly damaging cell membranes [51,52]; Bacillibactin restricts pathogenic bacterial growth through an iron ion competition strategy [53]. However, the most valuable finding of this study is the presence of seven functionally uncharacterized secondary BGCs within the SH-53 genome. These unannotated BGCs not only dominate in number but also suggest that this strain may have evolved novel antibacterial mechanisms that surpass conventional metabolic frameworks, thereby bestowing it with broader biocontrol potential [54].
Particularly noteworthy is that these 7 uncharacterized BGCs not only outnumber the known clusters but also indicate that SH-53 may produce novel antibacterial substances or signaling molecules that have yet to be reported. This rich diversity of BGCs, especially the high proportion of unknown clusters, distinguishes SH-53 from conventional agricultural strains, offering broader mechanistic possibilities and developmental prospects for its application in biocontrol [55].
Bacillus promotes plant growth through various mechanisms, one key role being the direct regulation of plant growth and development by secreting plant hormones such as auxins, cytokinins, and gibberellins [56,57]. For example, rhizosphere bacteria of Bacillus can significantly enhance root growth and expansion by secreting endogenous synthesized IAA and activating the plant’s endogenous auxin synthesis pathway [58]. Genome annotation has revealed that SH-53 possesses a complete tryptophan biosynthesis pathway (trpABCDEFG gene cluster), enabling it to autonomously synthesize IAA precursors, thereby regulating plant growth and development [59].
These strains degrade starch-based organic materials in the soil, such as plant residues and complex carbohydrates found in organic fertilizers, by secreting amylase. This process transforms them into simple sugars, such as glucose and maltose, which can be directly absorbed by plants. It not only improves the cycling efficiency of the soil organic carbon pool and loosens the soil structure but also provides an additional carbon source for plant photosynthesis. Particularly in habitats where organic matter is abundant but decomposes slowly, this can effectively alleviate the limitation of carbon source deficiency during the seedling stage of plants [60]. Notably, strain SH-53 annotates seven genes involved in amylase secretion [61], a significantly higher number than that of some conventional biocontrol strains (for instance, the commercial strain FZB42 has only 3–4 amylase-related genes [15]). This suggests that SH-53 has a stronger amylase secretion capacity and possesses outstanding potential in carbon source conversion and nutrient supply for plants, aligning with the complex organic matrix decomposition needs in its unique ecological niche (Wuliang Mountain Nature Reserve).
Iron is an essential trace element for plant growth and development, participating in key physiological processes such as chlorophyll synthesis, respiration, and enzymatic reactions. However, most iron in the soil exists in insoluble forms, such as iron hydroxide, and its bioavailability is limited by soil pH (which makes it more difficult to dissolve in acidic or alkaline soils), often becoming a limiting factor for plant growth [62,63]. Strains secrete iron carriers (such as siderophores or pyoverdine), which chelate with insoluble iron compounds in the soil due to their high affinity, forming soluble complexes and significantly increasing the effective iron content in the rhizosphere. This mechanism not only meets the strains’ own iron requirements but also provides a convenient pathway for plant roots to absorb iron [64]. For SH-53, this ability can inhibit pathogenic microorganisms through nutrient competition (since pathogens also depend on iron for growth) and enhance the plant’s resistance by improving its iron nutritional status. When iron is sufficient, chlorophyll synthesis in the plant is normal, photosynthesis efficiency is high, and both disease resistance and stress tolerance are significantly improved, forming a “strain-promoting + plant-resistance” synergistic effect. This mechanism constitutes a core part of SH-53’s multifunctional biocontrol system, in conjunction with the previously mentioned ISR regulatory network.
Additionally, the bioavailability of sulfur typically restricts plant growth; strains with sulfur-oxidizing capabilities can oxidize insoluble sulfides or organic sulfur compounds in the soil, releasing sulfate that is available for plant absorption, thus increasing the available sulfur content in the soil and indirectly promoting plant growth and development. The sulfur metabolism ability of SH-53 also provides strong support for its plant growth-promoting effects [65]. Genomic analysis revealed that SH-53 has been annotated with 14 sulfur metabolism-related genes, which can efficiently utilize sulfur sources in the environment through various sulfur metabolism pathways, such as cysteine synthesis, sulfite metabolism, and sulfate assimilation [66]. In summary, the strain SH-53 has comprehensive potential in promoting plant growth and maintaining plant health through multiple mechanisms, including the tryptophan-IAA synthesis pathway, amylase production, iron nutrient supply mediated by iron carriers, and sulfur nutrient supply mediated by sulfur metabolism, providing a theoretical basis for its application in agricultural production.
The analysis of antibiotic resistance and hemolytic safety of strain SH-53 provides fundamental support for its safe application. Although 268 resistance genes were identified in the genome of this strain, encompassing various resistance categories such as peptides and tetracyclines, the antibiotic susceptibility plate assays confirmed that the strain exhibited good sensitivity to the corresponding antibiotics, showing no resistant phenotypes. Most of these resistance genes are inherent adaptive genes of Bacillus subtilis, rather than acquired resistance genes with clinical risk [67,68,69]. This is consistent with the characteristics of commercially safe biocontrol strains FZB42 and SQR9, indicating no additional antibiotic resistance risk. Furthermore, the dual negative findings for hemolytic gene annotation and phenotypic experiments further solidify its safety profile [70].
More importantly, the absence of resistant phenotypes and relevant mobile genetic elements indicates that there is no risk of horizontal transfer of resistance genes [6]. This means that there is no potential threat to soil microecological balance or clinical antibiotic use, thereby eliminating core safety concerns for its large-scale application in agricultural biocontrol scenarios, ensuring ecological safety and reliability during the application process [71,72].
Hemolytic activity is a core assessment criterion for the pathogenicity of strains, as the production of hemolysins can cause toxic damage to the host. The genome of strain SH-53 lacks any hemolysis-related genes, and the hemolysis plate experiments showed no hemolytic phenomena. This thoroughly excludes the possibility of it causing disease through hemolytic toxins from both genetic background and phenotypic expression, clearly confirming that SH-53 is non-pathogenic and bears extremely low safety risks [73].
In the rhizospheric microecosystem, the competition for microbial resources is intense, and the antibacterial metabolic products of closely related Bacillus species and pathogenic bacteria are major stress factors for the survival of strains. Previous studies have shown that B. velezensis FZB42 and SQR9 can inhibit the growth of closely related strains by secreting antimicrobial substances [74]. This study confirms that the abundant resistance genes carried by SH-53 not only enable it to tolerate antimicrobial substances in the rhizosphere but also allow it to avoid self-toxicity effects from its own antimicrobial products, thereby maintaining metabolic homeostasis. Coupled with its significant inhibitory ability against closely related Bacillus strains, this provides critical ecological support for its biocontrol applications [75,76].
In summary, the experimental and analytical results indicate that this study confirms that B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53 is a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium with significant application potential. Furthermore, the genomic information of strain SH-53 may help to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying its antimicrobial activity.

5. Conclusions

Strain SH-53 was isolated from the Yunnan Wuliangshan National Nature Reserve, and based on whole-genome analysis and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA), it was confirmed to be B. amyloliquefaciens. This strain exhibits antagonistic effects against plant pathogens and can colonize the plant rhizosphere and promote plant growth through various mechanisms. It possesses the ability to produce multiple antibacterial secondary metabolites, synthesize auxin (IAA), secrete amylase, synthesize iron chelators, and efficiently utilize sulfur sources. The strain B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53 contains 27 ribosomal RNA operons and 4078 protein-coding genes, and 250 prophage-related genes were also identified. Additionally, the genome of SH-53 harbors 12 BGCs for secondary metabolites, of which 7 are novel gene clusters with unknown functions, significantly differing from conventional biocontrol strains. It also includes a complete core gene network related to ISR and supporting genes that ensure the homeostasis of secondary metabolism. The enrichment of novel secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters within the genome of B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53 provides critical genetic resources for the exploration of new antibacterial active substances and lays a molecular foundation for elucidating the evolutionary mechanisms of plant rhizosphere-promoting and biocontrol functions. Furthermore, its complete ISR regulatory network and secondary metabolism homeostasis supporting system further ensure the strain’s ability to maintain stable biocontrol efficacy in complex field environments. A genomic analysis of B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53 revealed that, although it contains 268 intrinsic antibiotic resistance genes, no resistant phenotype was observed, which is consistent with the characteristics of commercial biocontrol strains. Additionally, there are no mobile genetic elements, indicating no risk of horizontal transfer of resistance genes. Moreover, the absence of hemolytic-related genes and phenotypes confirms its non-pathogenicity and extremely low safety risk, laying a solid foundation for the large-scale application of this agricultural biocontrol agent. In summary, this study clarifies that this strain possesses core potential to be developed as an excellent biocontrol agent.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb48020193/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.J., Y.W., X.L., W.P., T.P., Z.S., F.H. and P.Y.; methodology, P.Y.; software, J.J.; formal analysis, J.J.; investigation, Y.W., T.P. and W.P.; resources, Y.W., Z.S. and F.H.; writing—original draft, J.J.; writing—review and editing, J.J. and P.Y.; funding acquisition, P.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Central Government Guided Local Science and Technology Development Fund (202407AC110006), and the Yunnan Province “Xingdian Talent” Support Program (XDYC-CYCX-2002-0071).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Genome sequences were deposited in the GenBank database under accession number CP187258.1 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCA_049677765.1/ (accessed on 8 August 2025)).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kazerooni, E.; Maharachchikumbura, S.; Al-Sadi, A.; Kang, S.; Yun, B.; Lee, I. Biocontrol potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens against Botrytis pelargonii and Alternaria alternata on Capsicum annuum. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ying, T.; Wu, P.; Gao, L.; Wang, C.; Zhang, T.; Liu, S.; Huang, R. Isolation and characterization of a new strain of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and its effect on strawberry preservation. LWT 2022, 165, 113712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, N.; Yang, D.; Kendall, J.; Borriss, R.; Druzhinina, I.; Kubicek, C.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, R. Comparative genomic analysis of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis reveals evolutional traits for adaptation to plant-associated habitats. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, B.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, L.; Zeng, Z.; Gong, L.; Wu, Y.; Li, W.-F. Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens instead of antibiotics on growth performance, intestinal health, and intestinal microbiota of broilers. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 679368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nguyen, H.; Tran, P.; Dam, H.; Nguyen, H.; Le, T.; Ho, P.; Nguyen, L. Whole genome sequence analysis of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain S2.5 as a potential probiotic for feed supplement in livestock production. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2024, 22, 100404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lu, H.; Yang, P.; Zhong, M.; Bilal, M.; Xu, H.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, J.; Liang, N.; Liu, S.; Zhao, L.; et al. Isolation of a potential probiotic strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LPB-18 and identification of antimicrobial compounds responsible for inhibition of food-borne pathogens. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 2186–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Migunova, V.; Sasanelli, N. Bacteria as biocontrol tool against phytoparasitic nematodes. Plants 2021, 10, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hua, Z.; Qu, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Zhou, E.; Qi, Y.; Yin, Y.; Rao, Y.; Tian, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, L.; et al. Genomic inference of the metabolism and evolution of the archaeal phylum Aigarchaeota. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, Y.; Yang, J.; Huang, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, Q.; Lyu, L.; Ju, F.; Li, J.; Zhang, S. Exploring the role of organotrophic microbes in geochemical cycling of cold seep sediments. Innov. Geosci. 2025, 3, 100123-1–100123-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lu, Q.; Xie, Y.; Gu, F.; Tu, C.; He, J.; Guo, Q.; Wu, Y.; Xu, M.; Liu, J. Potential of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens QY-1 as a biocontrol agent of Botrytis cinerea in postharvest blueberry. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2023, 128, 102117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liang, L.; Fu, Y.; Deng, S.; Wu, Y.; Gao, M. Genomic, antimicrobial, and aphicidal traits of Bacillus velezensis ATR2, and its biocontrol potential against ginger rhizome rot disease caused by Bacillus pumilus. Microorganisms 2021, 10, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhao, X.; Kuipers, O. Identification and classification of known and putative antimicrobial compounds produced by a wide variety of Bacillales species. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Luo, L.; Zhao, C.; Wang, E.; Raza, A.; Yin, C. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as an excellent agent for biofertilizer and biocontrol in agriculture: An overview for its mechanisms. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 259, 127016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tanaka, K.; Amaki, Y.; Ishihara, A.; Nakajima, H. Synergistic effects of [Ile7] surfactin homologues with bacillomycin D in suppression of gray mold disease by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens biocontrol strain SD-32. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 5344–5353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, X.; Koumoutsi, A.; Scholz, R.; Schneider, K.; Vater, J.; Süssmuth, R.; Piel, J.; Borriss, R. Genome analysis of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 reveals its potential for biocontrol of plant pathogens. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 140, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yang, Q.; Zhang, H.; You, J.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, J.; Aimaier, R.; Zhang, J.; Han, S.; Zhao, H.; et al. Transcriptome and metabolome analyses reveal that Bacillus subtilis BS-Z15 lipopeptides mycosubtilin homologue mediates plant defense responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1088220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zeng, Q.; Xie, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Gu, X.; Yang, P.; Hu, G.; Wang, Q. Organization, evolution and function of fengycin biosynthesis gene clusters in the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens group. Phytopathol. Res. 2021, 3, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, N.; Liao, Y.; Shi, Z.; Shen, Y.; Yang, T.; Feng, L.; Yi, X.; Tang, J.; Chen, Q.; Yang, P. Identification of Three Strains of Bacillus from the Forest Soil of Wuliang Mountain and Mining of Their Bioactivities. Biotechnol. Bull. 2024, 40, 277–288. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, N.; Liao, Y.; Shen, Y.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Q.; Yang, P. Optimization of fermentation conditions and biocontrol effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SH-53 from rhizosphere of rumex. J. Plant Prot. 2024, 51, 817–829. [Google Scholar]
  20. Roller, B.; Stoddard, S.; Schmidt, T. Exploiting rRNA operon copy number to investigate bacterial reproductive strategies. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 1, 16160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Belbahri, L.; Bouket, A.; Rekik, I.; Alenezi, F.; Vallat, A.; Luptakova, L.; Petrovova, E.; Oszako, T.; Cherrad, S.; Vacher, S.; et al. Comparative genomics of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains reveals a core genome with traits for habitat adaptation and a secondary metabolites rich accessory genome. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. She, T.; Tan, D.; Balcazar, J.; Friman, V.; Wang, D.; Zhu, D.; Ye, M.; Sun, M.; Yuan, S.; Hu, F. Phage-mediated horizontal transfer of Salmonella enterica virulence genes with regulatory feedback from the host. iMeta 2025, 4, e70042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liao, H.; Liu, C.; Zhou, S.; Liu, C.; Eldridge, D.; Ai, C.; Wilhelm, S.; Singh, B.; Liang, X.; Radosevich, M.; et al. Prophage-encoded antibiotic resistance genes are enriched in human-impacted environments. Nat. Commun. 2025, 15, 8315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. D’Rose, V.; Ganapathy Bhat, S. Whole genome sequence analysis enabled affirmation of the probiotic potential of marine sporulator Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BTSS3 isolated from Centroscyllium fabricii. Gene 2024, 864, 147305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Murugavel, K.; Karthikeyan, G.; Raveendran, M.; Sendhilvel, V.; Sudha, A.; Karthiba, L.; Rajendran, L. Insights into the genome sequence of an endophytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (TNOB22) from tea and its promising biocontrol activity against major diseases of tea. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2025, 138, 102680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cai, Y.; Tao, H.; Gaballa, A.; Pi, H.; Helmann, J. The extracytoplasmic sigma factor σX supports biofilm formation and increases biocontrol efficacy in Bacillus velezensis 118. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 5315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Glaeser, S.; Kämpfer, P. Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) in prokaryotic taxonomy. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 38, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chowdhury, S.; Hartmann, A.; Gao, X.; Borriss, R. Biocontrol mechanism by root-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42—A review. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sylla, J.; Alsanius, B.; Krüger, E.; Reineke, A.; Strohmeier, S.; Wohanka, W. Leaf microbiota of strawberries as affected by biological control agents. Phytopathology 2013, 103, 1001–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xu, Z.; Shao, J.; Li, B.; Yan, X.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, R. Contribution of bacillomycin D in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 to antifungal activity and biofilm formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 808–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, H.; Prajapati, V.; Prajapati, S.; Bais, H.; Lu, J. Comparative genome analysis of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens focusing on phylogenomics, functional traits, and prevalence of antimicrobial and virulence genes. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 724217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lam, V.B.; Meyer, T.; Arias, A.A.; Ongena, M.; Oni, F.E.; Höfte, M. Bacillus cyclic lipopeptides iturin and fengycin to control rice blast caused by Pyricularia oryzae in potting and acid sulfate soils by direct antagonism and induced systemic resistance. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lv, J.; Da, R.; Cheng, Y.; Tuo, X.; Wei, J.; Jiang, K.; Monisayo, A.; Han, B. Mechanism of antibacterial activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens C-1 lipopeptide toward anaerobic Clostridium difficile. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 3104613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yuan, Q.; Yang, P.; Liu, Y.; Tabl, K.; Guo, M.; Zhang, J.; Wu, A.; Liao, Y.; Huang, T.; He, W. Iturin and fengycin lipopeptides inhibit pathogenic Fusarium by targeting multiple components of the cell membrane and their regulative effects in wheat. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2025, 67, 2184–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Parker, J.; Walsh, C. Action and timing of BacC and BacD in the late stages of biosynthesis of the dipeptide antibiotic bacilysin. Biochemistry 2013, 52, 889–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, Y.; Feng, H.; Chen, L.; Zhang, H.; Dong, X.; Xiong, Q.; Zhang, R. Root-secreted spermine binds to Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 histidine kinase KinD and modulates biofilm formation. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2020, 33, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Q.; Li, J.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Peng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Hu, M.; Lin, W.; Wu, Z. Effects of quorum sensing and quorum quenching mediated by AHLs on plant-rhizosphere microbial interactions. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 2024, 32, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  38. Jia, R.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Ji, X.; Sadiq, F.; Wang, X.; Zhang, G. The role of quorum sensing effector ComA in regulating biofilm formation and surfactin production in Bacillus subtilis ASAG 010. Food Biosci. 2025, 69, 106842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhou, X.; Zhang, N.; Xia, L.; Li, Q.; Shao, J.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, R. ResDE two-component regulatory system mediates oxygen limitation-induced biofilm formation by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02744-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shao, Z.; Gu, S.; Zhang, X.; Xue, J.; Yan, T.; Guo, S.; Pommier, T.; Jousset, A.; Yang, T.; Xu, Y.; et al. Siderophore interactions drive the ability of Pseudomonas spp. consortia to protect tomato against Ralstonia solanacearum. Hortic. Res. 2024, 11, uhae186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gu, S.; Wei, Z.; Shao, Z.; Friman, V.; Cao, K.; Yang, T.; Kramer, J.; Wang, X.; Li, M.; Mei, X.; et al. Competition for iron drives phytopathogen control by natural rhizosphere microbiomes. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 1002–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Montejano-Ramírez, V.; Valencia-Cantero, E. Cross-talk between iron deficiency response and defense establishment in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Neilands, J.B. Siderophores: Structure and function of microbial iron transport compounds. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 26723–26726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xu, X.; Qiao, W.; Dong, Y.; Yang, H.; Xu, H.; Qiao, M. 3-Butanediol dehydrogenase is more efficient than acetoin reductase at metabolizing reserve carbon to improve carbon cycling pathways in Lactococcus lactis N8. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 299, 140023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ryu, C.; Farag, M.; Hu, C.; Reddy, M.; Kloepper, J.; Paré, P. Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mihalovits, L.; Ferenczy, G.; Keserű, G. Catalytic mechanism and covalent inhibition of UDP-N-Acetylglucosamine Enolpyruvyl Transferase (MurA): Implications to the design of novel antibacterials. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019, 59, 5161–5173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nirody, J.; Budin, I.; Rangamani, P. ATP synthase: Evolution, energetics, and membrane interactions. J. Gen. Physiol. 2020, 152, e201912475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ye, C.; Zhao, W.; Liu, D.; Yang, R.; Cui, Z.; Zou, D.; Li, D.; Wei, X.; Xiong, H.; Niu, C. Screening, identification, engineering, and characterization of Bacillus-derived α-amylase for effective tobacco starch degradation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 282, 137364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, T.; Liu, X.; Wu, M.; Ge, S. Molecular insights into the antifungal mechanism of bacilysin. J. Mol. Model. 2018, 24, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Erega, A.; Stefanic, P.; Dogsa, I.; Danevčič, T.; Simunovic, K.; Klančnik, A.; Možina, S.; Mulec, M. Bacillaene mediates the inhibitory effect of Bacillus subtilis on Campylobacter jejuni biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 87, e02955-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Deng, Y.; Chen, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J.; Xiao, R.; Wang, X.; Liu, B.; Chen, M.; He, J. Lipopeptide C17 fengycin B exhibits a novel antifungal mechanism by triggering metacaspase-dependent apoptosis in Fusarium oxysporum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 7943–7953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tang, Q.; Bie, X.; Lu, Z.; Lv, F.; Tao, Y.; Qu, X. Effects of fengycin from Bacillus subtilis fmbJ on apoptosis and necrosis in Rhizopus stolonifer. J. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 675–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lyng, M.; Jørgensen, J.; Schostag, M.; Jarmusch, S.; Aguilar, D.; Lozano-Andrade, C.; Kovács, Á. Competition for iron shapes metabolic antagonism between Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas marginalis. ISME J. 2024, 18, wrad001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, J.; Xie, X.; Li, B.; Yang, L.; Song, F.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, M. Complete genome analysis and antimicrobial mechanism of Bacillus velezensis GX0002980 reveals its biocontrol potential against mango anthracnose disease. Microbiol. Spectr. 2025, 13, e02685-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Muñoz, C.Y.; Zhou, L.; Yi, Y.; Kuipers, O.P. Biocontrol properties from phyllospheric bacteria isolated from Solanum lycopersicum and Lactuca sativa and genome mining of antimicrobial gene clusters. BMC Genom. 2022, 23, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yang, J.; Li, S.; Zhou, X.; Du, C.; Fang, J.; Li, X.; Zhao, J.; Ding, F.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens promotes cluster root formation of white lupin under low phosphorus by mediating auxin levels. Plant Physiol. 2025, 197, kiae676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sorokan, A.; Veselova, S.; Benkovskaya, G.; Maksimov, I. Endophytic strain Bacillus subtilis 26D increases levels of phytohormones and repairs growth of potato plants after colorado potato beetle damage. Plants 2021, 10, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hussein, K.; Kadhum, N.; Yassera, Y. The role of bacteria Bacillus subtilis in improving rooting response of Mung bean (Vigna ratiata) cuttings. J. Contemp. Med. Sci. 2016, 2, 88–92. [Google Scholar]
  59. Li, Y.; Gao, M.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.; Yu, S.; Lu, L. Halotolerant Enterobacter asburiae A103 isolated from the halophyte Salix linearistipularis: Genomic analysis and growth-promoting effects on Medicago sativa under alkali stress. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 289, 127909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, Y.; Hu, Q.P. Studying of the promotion mechanism of Bacillus subtilis QM3 on wheat seed germination based on β-amylase. Open Life Sci. 2020, 15, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dai, J.; Dong, A.; Xiong, G.; Liu, Y.; Hossain, S.; Liu, S.; Gao, N.; Li, S.; Wang, J.; Qiu, D. Production of highly active extracellular amylase and cellulase from Bacillus subtilis ZIM3 and a recombinant strain with a potential application in tobacco fermentation. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Khan, S.; Kaur, K.; Kumar, V.; Tiwari, S. Iron transport and homeostasis in plants: Current updates and applications for improving human nutrition values and sustainable agriculture. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 100, 373–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Saleem, A.; Zulfiqar, A.; Saleem, M.; Ali, B.; Saleem, M.; Ali, S.; Tufekci, E.; Tufekci, A.; Rahimi, M.; Mostafa, R. Alkaline and acidic soil constraints on iron accumulation by Rice cultivars in relation to several physio-biochemical parameters. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wang, N.; Wang, T.; Chen, Y.; Wang, M.; Lu, Q.; Wang, K.; Dou, Z.; Chi, Z.; Qiu, W.; Dai, J.; et al. Microbiome convergence enables siderophore-secreting-rhizobacteria to improve iron nutrition and yield of peanut intercropped with maize. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vishnu; Sharma, P.; Kaur, J.; Gosal, S.; Walia, S. Characterization of Sulfur Oxidizing Bacteria and Their Effect on Growth Promotion of Brassica napus L. J. Basic Microbiol. 2024, 64, e2400239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, H.; Hou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z. Enhancement of sulfur conversion rate in the production of L-cysteine by engineered Escherichia coli. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 68, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Harwood, C.; Mouillon, J.-M.; Pohl, S.; Arnau, J. Secondary metabolite production and the safety of industrially important members of the Bacillus subtilis group. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 42, 721–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Nøhr-Meldgaard, K.; Struve, C.; Ingmer, H.; Agersø, Y. Intrinsic tet(L) sub-class in Bacillus velezensis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens is associated with a reduced susceptibility toward tetracycline. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 966016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chebotar, V.; Myskova, A.; Khudyaeva, M.; Keleinikova, O.; Baganova, M.; Zaplatkin, A.; Pishchik, V.; Chizhevskaya, E. Draft genome sequence and analysis of endophyte Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain Can02R isolated from the roots of Chenopodium album L. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2025, 14, e01075-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fan, B.; Wang, C.; Song, X.; Ding, X.; Wu, L.; Wu, H.; Gao, X.; Borriss, R. Bacillus velezensis FZB42 in 2018: The Gram-Positive Model Strain for Plant Growth Promotion and Biocontrol. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kumavath, R.; Gupta, P.; Tatta, E.R.; Mohan, M.S.; Salim, S.A. Unraveling the Role of Mobile Genetic Elements in Antibiotic Resistance Transmission and Defense Strategies in Bacteria. Front. Syst. Biol. 2025, 5, 1557413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ji, X.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Wei, R.; Wang, R.; He, T. Livestock Probiotics in China: Quality Analysis and Enterococcus-Associated Antibiotic Resistance Dissemination Risks. Engineering 2025, 55, 241–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Petjul, K.; Kan-A-Roon, N.; Khunsanit, P.; Kollboon, U.; Boonmee, T. Evaluation of enzymatic activity, hemolytic safety, and antibiotic susceptibility of Bacillus spp. isolated from giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) farms in Kalasin Province, Thailand. Vet. World 2025, 18, 3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, D.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, G.; Xia, L.; Dong, X.; Li, Q.; Liles, M.; Shao, J.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, R. A genomic island in a plant beneficial rhizobacterium encodes novel antimicrobial fatty acids and a self-protection shield to enhance its competition. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 21, 3455–3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Peng, Y.; Zhou, C.; Qiu, F.; Peng, D.; Wang, X.; Li, X. Acid-resistant Bacillus velezensis effectively controls pathogenic Colletotrichum capsici and improves plant health through metabolic interactions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2025, 91, e00340-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jian, Z.; Zeng, L.; Xu, T.; Sun, S.; Yan, S.; Yang, L.; Huang, Y.; Jia, J.; Dou, T. Antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria: Occurrence, spread, and control. J. Basic Microbiol. 2021, 61, 1049–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene. Note: “T” indicates that this strain is a type strain.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene. Note: “T” indicates that this strain is a type strain.
Cimb 48 00193 g001
Figure 2. Genomic circle map of B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53. Note: From the inside out, the first circle represents the scale; the second circle represents the GC skew; the third circle represents the GC content; the fourth and seventh circles represent the COG categories to which each CDS belongs; and the fifth and sixth circles represent the positions of CDS, tRNA, and RNA on the genome.
Figure 2. Genomic circle map of B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53. Note: From the inside out, the first circle represents the scale; the second circle represents the GC skew; the third circle represents the GC content; the fourth and seventh circles represent the COG categories to which each CDS belongs; and the fifth and sixth circles represent the positions of CDS, tRNA, and RNA on the genome.
Cimb 48 00193 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of functional annotation of strain SH-53 genes across databases.
Figure 3. Distribution of functional annotation of strain SH-53 genes across databases.
Cimb 48 00193 g003
Figure 4. Statistics of COG annotation classification results for the genome of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SH-53. The COG functional annotation includes 23 categories.
Figure 4. Statistics of COG annotation classification results for the genome of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SH-53. The COG functional annotation includes 23 categories.
Cimb 48 00193 g004
Figure 5. GO annotation classification result statistics of B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53 genome.
Figure 5. GO annotation classification result statistics of B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53 genome.
Cimb 48 00193 g005
Figure 6. KEGG annotation classification result statistics of B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53 genome.
Figure 6. KEGG annotation classification result statistics of B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53 genome.
Cimb 48 00193 g006
Figure 7. Annotation of carbohydrate-active enzymes.
Figure 7. Annotation of carbohydrate-active enzymes.
Cimb 48 00193 g007
Figure 8. Genomic localization of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters in B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53.
Figure 8. Genomic localization of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters in B. amyloliquefaciens SH-53.
Cimb 48 00193 g008
Figure 9. Functional annotation results of the SH-53 genome based on the CARD database.
Figure 9. Functional annotation results of the SH-53 genome based on the CARD database.
Cimb 48 00193 g009
Figure 10. Effect of strain SH-53 on tomato seed germination.
Figure 10. Effect of strain SH-53 on tomato seed germination.
Cimb 48 00193 g010
Table 1. Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters in strain SH-53 predicted by antiSMASH.
Table 1. Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters in strain SH-53 predicted by antiSMASH.
Cluster IDNucleotide Length (bp)Gene Cluster TypeMost Similar Known ClusterSimilarity Confidence
165,411NRPSsurfactinHigh
222,598lanthipeptide-class-iii
341,245PKS-likebutirosin A/butirosin B
420,744terpene
5110,124NRPS, T3PKS, transAT-PKSbacillaeneHigh
6110,422NRPS, betalactone, transAT-PKSfengycinHigh
721,884terpene
841,101T3PKS
920,891terpene-precursor
1045,529NRPS
1165,250NRP-metallophore, NRPS, RiPP-like, terpene-precursorbacillibactinHigh
1241,419otherbacilysinHigh
Table 2. Effects of strain SH-53 on seed germination rate and root length.
Table 2. Effects of strain SH-53 on seed germination rate and root length.
TreatmentCKNBT1T2T3
Germinationrate/%50.00 ± 17.32 a33.33 ± 15.28 b60.00 ± 17.32 a53.33 ± 15.28 a40.00 ± 10.00 b
Rootlength/cm7.97 ± 2.66 b0.46 ± 0.24 c5.56 ± 1.20 b7.77 ± 2.57 b10.10 ± 3.19 a
Note: CK: Sterile water; NB: NB medium; T1: Original bacterial fermentation broth; T2: 10-fold diluted bacterial fermentation broth; T3: 100-fold diluted bacterial fermentation broth. Data in the table represent mean ± standard error; Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jia, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Pei, W.; Pu, T.; Shi, Z.; He, F.; Yang, P. Multifunctional Bioactivity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SH-53: Analysis of Multiple Antagonistic and Synergistic Growth Promotion Mechanisms Based on Whole Genome. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2026, 48, 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48020193

AMA Style

Jia J, Wang Y, Liu X, Pei W, Pu T, Shi Z, He F, Yang P. Multifunctional Bioactivity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SH-53: Analysis of Multiple Antagonistic and Synergistic Growth Promotion Mechanisms Based on Whole Genome. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2026; 48(2):193. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48020193

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jia, Jianpeng, Yu Wang, Xin Liu, Weihua Pei, Te Pu, Zhufeng Shi, Feifei He, and Peiwen Yang. 2026. "Multifunctional Bioactivity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SH-53: Analysis of Multiple Antagonistic and Synergistic Growth Promotion Mechanisms Based on Whole Genome" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 48, no. 2: 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48020193

APA Style

Jia, J., Wang, Y., Liu, X., Pei, W., Pu, T., Shi, Z., He, F., & Yang, P. (2026). Multifunctional Bioactivity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SH-53: Analysis of Multiple Antagonistic and Synergistic Growth Promotion Mechanisms Based on Whole Genome. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 48(2), 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48020193

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop