Previous Article in Journal
Long Non-Coding RNAs: Significant Drivers of Carcinogenesis Mechanisms in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
K-562 Extracellular Vesicles Partially Protect Intact Cells from Oxidative Stress and Provide Limited Resistance to Imatinib
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Histone-, Receptor-, and Integrin-Related Gene Products and ADAM28 as Relevant to B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)

by
Makayla R. K. Wilkins
and
Brett E. Pickett
*
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84062, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47(9), 699; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47090699
Submission received: 18 July 2025 / Revised: 19 August 2025 / Accepted: 26 August 2025 / Published: 28 August 2025

Abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood cancer, with pediatric ALL having a ~90 percent cure rate, while the adult cure rate is considerably lower. B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common subtype of ALL and is generally treated through a variety of chemotherapy drugs that can cause undesired side effects, adverse events, or other complications. Consequently, there is a need for improved understanding of the shared gene expression profiles and underlying molecular mechanisms shared among various B-ALL subtypes. In this study, 259 publicly available RNA-sequencing samples were evaluated and retrieved from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and then pre-processed using a robust computational workflow. Differential gene expression, pathway enrichment, marker prediction, and drug repurposing analyses were then performed to facilitate a better mechanistic understanding of disease. We found both previously identified as well as novel differentially expressed genes. Specifically, we observed upregulation in the HIST2H2AA3, EPHA7, and MPR1 genes; while downregulation was observed for the IGHA1, ANGPTL1, and CHAD genes. We identified multiple pathways, including “Integrins in Angiogenesis”, to be significantly affected in B-ALL. We then used these significant pathways to predict and rank 306 existing therapeutic targets that could potentially be repurposed for B-ALL, including three that have not been evaluated in human clinical trials. Using a tree-based classification algorithm, we also predicted ADAM28 as a possible mechanistic marker. The results of this study have potential implications for patients who have been diagnosed with B-ALL by providing improved mechanistic understanding and information on possible diagnostics and repurposed therapeutics for B-ALL.

1. Introduction

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood cancer, with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) being the most common subtype [1,2]. B-ALL, which occurs in B-cell progenitor cells, is responsible for about 75% of adult ALL diagnoses [3]. In pediatric ALL cases, the cure rate is ~90% [2], while the cure rate in adult ALL is ~30–50% [3,4].
Although the survival rate of acute lymphoblastic leukemia has improved in recent years, the standard therapy, which includes a combination of various chemotherapy agents, such as vincristine, anthracycline, L-asparaginase, and methotrexate, can lead to a variety of negative side-effects, including both short-term and long-term complications [1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Thus, a need still exists to identify improved treatments that can increase the quality of life for B-ALL patients both during and after treatment and increase the cure rate, especially for adults. Such advances in the discovery and development of new therapeutic options can be achieved through increased understanding of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of B-ALL. Given the relatively small number of human studies involving primary cells, performing a secondary analysis of multiple public datasets is justified.
The purpose of the current study was to perform a large-scale comparison of the gene expression patterns between B-cells from patients with B-ALL vs. B-cells from healthy patients to better understand the common underlying molecular mechanisms of disease, as well as to identify any shared transcriptional diagnostic markers in a large set of B-ALL patients regardless of molecular type. We report our findings of the significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) found in B-ALL, as well as significant signaling pathways, potential targets for drug repurposing, and one mechanistic marker derived from the compared transcriptomic data. We believe these findings will be useful in the future development of therapeutic targets that can increase efficiency in treating B-ALL.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Acquisition

Samples were gathered from publicly available data found from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database [10]. Specifically, we identified relevant studies and samples by applying search criteria including “Homo sapiens” and “gene expression using high-throughput sequencing” and manual selection to rule out cell lines, patient-derived xenograft samples, treated cells, relapsed samples, and single-cell RNA-sequencing data to obtain the desired RNA-sequencing reads for B-ALL and non-diseased B-cell samples. The fastq files for these RNA sequencing data were downloaded from the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database [11]. The B-ALL samples were obtained from three datasets (GSE156531 [12], GSE124824 [13], and GSE79373 [14]), which labeled samples as “B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” “B-lineage ALL,” and “precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia” respectively, and the healthy B-cell samples were likewise acquired from three different datasets (GSE115655 [15], GSE181859 [16], and GSE149050 [17]). All B-ALL samples were collected from the bone marrow with 25 known pediatric samples, one sample from a 19 year-old patient, and 197 samples of unknown age. These 197 samples came from a larger dataset mixed with pediatric and adult data; however, the latter dataset lacked age-related metadata. Thus, the exact counts in each age category are unknown. Of the 36 controls, four came from bone marrow samples and 32 came from peripheral blood samples. There were two known pediatric samples, 14 adult samples, and 20 of unknown age.

2.2. Preprocessing of RNA-Sequencing Data

These fastq files were run through the existing Automated Reproducible MOdular workflow for preprocessing and differential analysis of RNA-seq data (ARMOR) v1.5.10 bioinformatics workflow [18]. The ARMOR pipeline performs quality control on the RNA-seq reads using FastQC v0.11.9, trims adapters and poor-quality regions of the reads with TrimGalore! v0.6.6, quantifies and maps reads to the human transcriptome with Salmon v1.4.0 [19], calculates differential expression using edgeR v4.2.2 [20], and computes significantly enriched Gene Ontology terms with Camera v3.60.6 [21]. A metadata file and configuration file were created to provide appropriate instructions for this workflow and assign fastq files to their respective groups, B-ALL or control.

2.3. Downstream Analyses

The differentially expressed genes calculated using ARMOR were then analyzed using the Signaling Pathway Impact Analysis v2.54.0 (SPIA) program to generate a null distribution for each pathway based on the input genes through permutation and bootstrapping [22]. The signaling pathways were retrieved from five public databases, including KEGG, Reactome, and NCI, as has been done previously [23,24]. The significant signaling pathway results that were generated with SPIA were then used as input for the Pathway2Targets algorithm [25,26]. Briefly, this algorithm uses a customizable weighting scheme to rank potential therapeutics by various attributes in the Open Targets database that could be repurposed to target members of the significantly altered B-ALL pathways. Lastly, the Salmon gene counts data from the ARMOR pipeline was used as the input for the tree-based machine learning workflow to predict transcriptional mechanistic markers of B-ALL disease.

3. Results

3.1. Unsupervised Clustering Reveals Separation of Case and Control Samples

To determine whether the samples in this study formed separate clusters based on disease state, we began by performing a principal component analysis of all included samples. These PCA results showed the potential for two clusters based on the phenotype (Figure 1). We calculated that 89.07% of the variance between samples was explained by the first two principal components. Specifically, principal component one explained 81.33% of the variance, while principal component two explained an additional 7.74% of the variance. We next generated a Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) plot in an attempt to improve the resolution. The UMAP shows that the control samples clustered relatively closely to each other, while the B-ALL samples were much more diverse. Although this observation was partially expected, the diversity of the B-ALL samples could be due to differences in one or more factors, including molecular subtype, genetic aberrations, and/or cancer stage. These results suggest sufficient transcriptional differences to justify downstream analyses of the transcriptional profiles comparing B-ALL and healthy B-cells.

3.2. Differential Gene Expression Highlights Significant Differences in B-ALL

To elucidate the transcriptional differences between B-ALL and healthy B-cells, we applied a robust computational workflow to process and analyze RNA-sequencing data collected from publicly available clinical samples. Our analysis, which consisted of 223 B-ALL samples and 36 healthy B-cell samples, revealed over 8000 statistically significant differentially expressed genes (FDR-adjusted p-value < 0.05), and a log2 fold change (log2FC) value greater than the absolute value of one (Figure 2, Supplementary Materials). Unexpectedly, approximately 1000 of these statistically significant DEGs were pseudogenes.
We found that the most statistically significant six protein-coding DEGs that were upregulated in B-ALL samples included two histone gene products named histone cluster 2 H2A family member A3 and istone Cluster 1 H3 family member B (HIST2H2AA3 and HIST1H3B respectively); C-type lectin domain containing 14A (CLEC14A), which is a gene product involved in endothelium and angiogenesis; as well as other gene products that contribute receptor binding such as ephrin receptor A7 and natriuretic peptide receptor 1 (EPHA7, NPR1 respectively) (Table 1).
The top six statistically significant protein-coding DEGs found to be downregulated in B-ALL samples were angiopoietin-like 1 (ANGPTL1), as well as gene products that function in immunoglobulin chain formation-associated immunoglobulin heavy constant alpha 1 and immunoglobulin kappa variable 3D-11 (IGHA1 and IGKV3D-11, respectively), adhesion-associated chondroadherin (CHAD), glycine-N-acyltransferase-like 1B (GLYATL1B), and a churchill domain containing 1-farnesyltransferase fusion gene product (CHURC1-FNTB) (Table 2).

3.3. Signaling Pathway Enrichment Identifies Eight Biologically Relevant Cascades

We next used the SPIA algorithm, which uses protein–protein interactions and topology-based information to identify intracellular signaling pathways that are significantly enriched in our DEGs. Briefly, this algorithm uses permutation and bootstrapping to generate a null statistical distribution for each pathway. Our pathway analysis identified eight significantly enriched pathways that were significantly enriched in our list of DEGs. Such pathways included the “integrins in angiogenesis” pathway (false discovery rate-adjusted p-value 8.565 × 10−3), “Antigen processing and presentation” (FDR-adjusted p-value 7.797 × 10−4), “Calcium signaling pathway” (FDR-adjusted p-value 3.862 × 10−3), and others (Table 3).

3.4. Therapeutic Target Prioritization Predicts Known and Novel Targets

We next wanted to determine whether the signaling pathway results could be used to predict therapeutic targets that could be repurposed for B-ALL. Although the “integrins in angiogenesis” pathway did not contain any existing targets, we obtained 306 total therapeutic targets using the Pathways2Targets algorithm. A subset of the highest-ranked predicted targets for repurposing include tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor protein p53 (TP53), and AKT serine/threonine kinase 1 (AKT1); which could potentially be repurposed as protein targets for B-ALL (Table 4).
We also identified FMS-related receptor tyrosine kinase 1 (FLT1) as a potential target for repurposing, which previously has not been evaluated for B-ALL in clinical trials. Our effort to identify more early-stage targets for repurposing consisted of filtering the Pathway2Targets results to remove those that have been (1) FDA approved for at least one indication, (2) evaluated in a phase three clinical trial, and (3) involved in at least five phase two clinical trials. This approach produced a subset of predicted targets for repurposing that included cluster of differentiation-40 (CD40), toll-like receptor 8 (TLR8), and glutamate metabotropic receptor 5 (GRM5). None of these three targets have been evaluated in clinical trials for B-ALL previously.

3.5. Machine Learning Identified ADAM28 as a Mechanistic Marker

To determine potential mechanistic markers that display more consistent patterns across B-ALL and healthy controls, we used the RNA-sequencing gene counts data as input to a tree-based machine learning analysis implemented in the xgboost R library to detect additional gene products that play a mechanistic role in B-ALL. This analysis identified ADAM metallopeptidase domain 28 (ADAM28) as a putative mechanistic marker. Our analysis showed this potential marker to have both a specificity and sensitivity of 1.0, meaning that this one gene product could potentially predict with 100% accuracy whether a patient in our multi-study dataset had B-ALL. We found this gene to be significantly downregulated in our B-ALL analysis, with a log2FC of −6.08 (FDR-adjusted p-value 1.92 × 10−86). This gene product was not in the most downregulated DEGs reported above, which was expected given that this approach applied machine learning to identify the gene product that was most consistently found in the disease phenotype rather than those that significantly differed between the case and control groups.

4. Discussion

The goal of this work was to perform a secondary analysis of 259 existing publicly available RNA-sequencing samples comparing patients with B-ALL to healthy controls. The novelty of our approach includes multiple samples across various studies, which potentially increases the statistical power across a larger population of humans. As such, our findings include both previously reported DEGs, as well as novel DEGs that may contribute to the characteristics shared between the various B-ALL types. We identified multiple significant intracellular mechanistic signaling pathways, as well as 306 therapeutic targets that could be relevant to B-ALL. Among this list of existing therapeutic targets are FLT1, CD40, TLR8, and GRM5, which could potentially be repurposed specifically for B-ALL. We also report the results from a tree-based machine learning exercise that identified the ADAM28 gene product as a potential mechanistic marker, which was downregulated in B-ALL.
HIST2H2AA3 was the most upregulated gene in our differential expression analysis. Although there is currently a lack of direct connections between HIST2H2AA3 and B-ALL, there is evidence that this gene is altered in peripheral blood mononuclear cells after exposure to benzene, which has been linked to leukemia [27], and shows a potentially noteworthy mechanism to explore in future experiments.
The ephrin type-A receptor 7 (EPHA7) gene was also highly upregulated in our differential expression analysis. This gene product is part of the Eph/Ephrin class of receptors and genes, which are tyrosine kinase receptors, and contribute to development and growth [28,29]. The EPHA7 gene product has been previously found to be upregulated in B-ALL in a comparison between pediatric patients with B-ALL and pediatric patients with other common blood conditions [30]. Another study found EPHA7 to be upregulated in B-ALL (compared to healthy samples), which is consistent with our findings [29]. It should be noted that a prior study found EPHA7 to be methylated in several leukemia cell lines and acute lymphoblastic leukemia patient samples [28], which may be dependent on various experimental conditions.
The natriuretic peptide receptor 1 (NPR1) gene was third-highest on our list of differentially expressed genes. This gene product is a membrane-bound receptor for the vasoactive hormones atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and is a guanylyl cyclase that has previously been associated with B-ALL [31,32]. Interestingly, prior work observed that NPR1 was upregulated in B-lineage ALL, with no added chromosomal abnormalities compared to three other main subtypes of B-lineage ALL [33], while a separate study found NPR1 to be upregulated in mixed-lineage leukemia gene rearrangement (MLL-R) ALL [34]. Our analysis, which focused specifically on B-cell ALL, found NPR1 to be upregulated in B-ALL when compared to healthy controls, which is novel. Additional work is needed to better characterize the role of NPR1 in B-ALL.
Divergent protein kinase domain 1C (DIPK1C) was also identified as upregulated in our differential expression analysis. This gene product is found in the endoplasmic reticulum, though its function has not been fully characterized. One prior study found elevated expression of DIPK1C in precursor B-ALL (BCP-ALL) samples that were sensitive to a second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase mimetic therapy [35]. Further evaluation of the mechanisms of this gene in B-ALL could prove fruitful in developing targeted cancer therapies for B-ALL cases.
We also identified histone cluster 1 H3 family member B (HIST1H3B) to be strongly upregulated in the B-ALL vs. healthy control comparison. This gene was previously found to be a DEG in both adult and pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [36]; however, overexpression of this gene product in B-ALL is novel. CLEC14A was also highly upregulated, and its gene product is found on the surface of endothelial cells in the blood vessels. It was found to be overexpressed in the vasculature of various solid tumors [37], as well as in two subtypes of precursor B-ALL in samples with high expression of binder of MAP3K1 and KLF4 (BAALC) [38]. However, we did not find previous literature that compared CLEC14A expression in B-ALL to healthy samples, as was done in the current work.
The ANGPTL1 gene was found to be highly downregulated in our analysis. Its gene product is part of the angiopoietin family, which contains factors involved in vascular growth. This gene has been shown to inhibit solid tumor metastasis and has been shown to be relevant in other cancers [39,40], although relatively little is known about its role in B-ALL [39,40,41,42,43]. One prior study found this gene product to be upregulated in multiple cancer types, including AML, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), T-cell lymphoma, unspecified ALL, pre B-ALL, and T-cell ALL. Additional experiments in the wet lab will help to better elucidate the role of this gene product in B-ALL.
CHAD was also highly downregulated in our analysis. The gene product has been shown to bind to chondrocytes through the α2β1 integrin [44], while GLYATL1B is thought to be involved in activities related to glutamine processing. Our observation that CHAD and GLYATL1B are significantly downregulated in B-ALL is novel.
CHURC1-FNTB was also on our list of downregulated genes. This readthrough results from a fusion gene consisting of the churchill domain containing 1 gene and the farnesyltransferase, CAAX box, subunit beta gene. The first of these two gene products contributes to regulation of transcription and mediating fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling and binds zinc [45]. The second contributes to protein farnesylation and also binds zinc ions for function [46]. Our finding that CHURC1-FNTB is differentially expressed in B-ALL is novel, though work has been done to pursue this target as a cancer immunotherapy for a variety of different cancers, including AML [47,48].
We also found IGHA1 and IGKV3D-11 to be downregulated in B-ALL. A prior study in chronic lymphocytic leukemia found IGKV3D-11 to be downregulated [49]. In addition, prior proteomic analysis of human MLL-R BCP-ALL samples vs. healthy precursor B-cell samples, found IGHA1 to be downregulated [50]. However, though we believe this to be a novel finding in B-ALL, the abnormal expression of immunoglobulins in cancerous B-cells is not surprising.
Our pathway enrichment analysis identified eight intracellular signaling pathways that were dysregulated in B-ALL, including “Integrins in angiogenesis”. There have been many prior studies that have associated angiogenesis or integrins to the progression of B-ALL [51,52]. Interestingly, a previous study that treated B-ALL cell lines with an anti-alpha-6 integrin antibody observed a significant decrease in cell survival [53]. Overall, this demonstrates that this pathway is one area of further research that could improve the effectiveness of B-ALL treatment when included with conventional drugs, even though it contains no existing therapeutic targets. A subset of the remaining significantly affected pathways such as “Systemic lupus erythematosus” and “Epstein-Barr virus infection” have previously been associated with B-ALL [54,55,56,57], while pathways such as the “NF-kappa B signaling pathway” and “Toll-like receptor signaling pathway” are known to play a role in innate immunity and have been associated with B-ALL in prior studies [58,59,60,61]. Additional experiments are needed to better characterize the role of these pathways in B-ALL.
Some of the established therapeutic targets that were highly ranked in our B-ALL target repurposing analysis include TNF-alpha [62,63,64], IL-6 [65,66], TP53 [67,68], AKT1 [69], and BCL2 [70]. Interestingly, FLT1 was also predicted to be a relevant target for B-ALL. FLT1 is a cell-surface receptor for vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) A and B, which play roles in cell survival and migration as well as chemotaxis and cancer cell invasion. FLT1 is also a receptor for placental growth factor (PGF), which positively regulates cell proliferation and tumor growth. FLT1 has been evaluated as a target in other cancers (e.g., acute myeloid leukemia, leukemia, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia) and has been reported to be an important gene product in B-ALL [30,33,71,72]. However, using this target as a potential target for B-ALL has not been evaluated in human clinical trials (platform.opentargets.org).
Identifying CD40, TLR8, and GRM5 from the list of filtered therapeutic targets that have been tested in multiple phase-two trials is both interesting and biologically relevant. CD40, which is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, transduces ERK-activating signals in B cells to induce secretion of immunoglobulins. This therapeutic target has been evaluated in a phase-two clinical trial for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and another trial for Sjogren syndrome. It has also been involved in phase one clinical trials for chronic lymphocytic leukemia, but for no other subtype of leukemia, including B-ALL. Interestingly, CD40 has been reported as playing a role in B-ALL [59,73], with recent work in a patient-derived xenograft mouse model showing that a CD40 agonist could effectively target B-ALL cells [74].
TLR8 is known to play a key role in the innate immune response, with evidence of agonists contributing to progression of B-ALL [75], and the potential to enable lymphocytes to infiltrate solid tumors [76]. GRM5 is a G-protein-coupled receptor for glutamate, which is generally associated with neurons. Binding of this receptor activates the phosphatidylinositol system to generate a calcium-activated chloride current. This gene product has previously been associated with B-ALL [77], though its role has not been well characterized. While the results from our target repurposing analysis at least partially reflects the underrepresentation of all gene products across existing curated pathways, we believe that the high-ranked targets from this analysis particularly warrant validation in subsequent wet-lab experiments.
Lastly, the ADAM28 gene, which was identified by our machine learning approach to predict mechanistic markers, has been shown in various cancers [78,79,80]. Past research on this gene product in solid (lung) tumors showed that it may act as a tumor suppressor [81], and that ADAM28 protein levels were higher in adjacent healthy tissues in human colorectal cancer tumors [82]. ADAM28 has also been reported as having a role in inducing leukemic cell proliferation in B-AML [83]. Prior work has shown that bone marrow levels of ADAM28 were increased in recently diagnosed B-ALL patients when compared to healthy controls, and that ADAM28 expression was significantly higher in B-ALL patients who relapsed compared to patients who continued in remission [84]. However, it was unclear if the increased ADAM28 expression in the latter study was specifically due to B cells, which could be one potential factor that contributed to our differing results. Overall, this and other studies support ADAM28 as a potential mechanistic marker for B-ALL. Nevertheless, additional characterization experiments are required to determine whether ADAM28 could have diagnostic and/or prognostic potential in at least a subset of pediatric B-ALL cases.
There are potential limitations to this study, which primarily revolve around the use of publicly available bulk RNA-sequencing data with inconsistent metadata. One such limitation is that the ethnicity and sex of the patients from whom the samples were collected were unknown in the majority of the datasets, as well as the patient age in a subset of the datasets. In addition, only bone marrow B-ALL samples were used, but the controls contained a mixture of bone marrow and peripheral blood-derived B-cells. Even given these potential limitations, our results from 259 samples replicate findings from past work and include novel results. This suggests that the findings from this study are likely to be relevant to B-ALL, although additional validation experiments in multiple patient cohorts are still needed to validate the findings of this study.

5. Conclusions

Overall, this study identified statistically significant differentially expressed genes between B cells from patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and healthy B cells. The top DEGs analyzed included four genes with differential expression that have been previously associated with B-ALL, which shows the validity of our approach. In addition, eight of the DEGs in our B-ALL cells vs. normal B-cells are novel in B-ALL and could be investigated further in the context of B-ALL. We also found the “integrins in angiogenesis” and other pathways to be significantly dysregulated during this disease. Our results have predicted several potential therapeutic targets that could be repurposed for B-ALL, and that the ADAM28 gene product could potentially predict B-ALL with 100 percent accuracy in our combined dataset. These results suggest a continued need for continued research into the underlying mechanisms for B-ALL in bone marrow and could potentially be applied to the development and/or repurposing of targets to improve B-ALL treatment in future experiments.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb47090699/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R.K.W.; methodology, B.E.P.; software, B.E.P.; validation, M.R.K.W. and B.E.P.; formal analysis, M.R.K.W. and B.E.P.; investigation, B.E.P.; resources, B.E.P.; data curation, M.R.K.W.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R.K.W. and B.E.P.; writing—review and editing, M.R.K.W. and B.E.P.; visualization, M.R.K.W. and B.E.P.; supervision, B.E.P.; project administration, B.E.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting our reported results can be found in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database using the following identifiers: GSE156531 [12], GSE124824, and GSE79373,GSE115655, GSE181859, and GSE149050.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the Office of Research Computing at Brigham Young University for providing access to the necessary computational resources and support.

Conflicts of Interest

BEP has a vested interest in Pythia Biosciences.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
B-ALLB-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia
GEOGene Expression Omnibus
DEGDifferentially expressed genes
SRASequence read archive
ARMORAutomated Reproducible Modular workflow for preprocessing and differential analysis of RNA-seq data
SPIASignaling pathway impact analysis
PCAPrincipal component analysis
UMAPUniform manifold approximation and projection
FDRfalse discovery rate-adjusted p-value
HIST2H2AA3Histone cluster 2 H2A family member A3
HIST1H3B H3 clustered histone 2
CLEC14AC-type lectin domain containing 14A
EPHA7Ephrin receptor A7
NPR1natriuretic peptide receptor 1
ANGPTL1Angiopoietin-like 1
IGHA1Immunoglobulin chain formation-associated immunoglobulin heavy constant alpha 1
IGKV3D-11Immunoglobulin kappa variable 3D-11
CHADAdhesion-associated chondroadherin
GLYATL1BGlycine-N-acyltransferase like 1B
CHURC1-FNTBChurchill domain containing 1-farnesyltransferase fusion
TNFTumor necrosis factor alpha
IL6Interleukin 6
p53Tumor protein p53
AKT1AKT serine/threonine kinase 1
FLT1FMS-related receptor tyrosine kinase 1
CD40Cluster of differentiation 40
TLR8Toll-like receptor 8
GRM5Glutamate metabotropic receptor 5
ADAM28ADAM metallopeptidase domain 28
DIPK1CDivergent protein kinase domain 1C
BCP-ALLPrecursor B-ALL
BAALCBAALC binder of MAP3K1 and KLF4
MLL-Rmixed-lineage leukemia gene rearrangement
AMLAcute myeloid leukemia
BCL2BCL2 apoptosis regulator

References

  1. Inaba, H.; Pui, C.H. Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  2. Bhojwani, D.; Yang, J.J.; Pui, C.H. Biology of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 2015, 62, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  3. Terwilliger, T.; Abdul-Hay, M. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A comprehensive review and 2017 update. Blood Cancer J. 2017, 7, e577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  4. Sasaki, K.; Jabbour, E.; Short, N.J.; Jain, N.; Ravandi, F.; Pui, C.H.; Kantarjian, H. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A population-based study of outcome in the United States based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database, 1980–2017. Am. J. Hematol. 2021, 96, 650–658, Erratum in Am. J. Hematol. 2021, 96, 1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  5. Zhang, R.; Zhu, H.; Yuan, Y.; Zhao, J.; Yang, X.; Tian, Z. Risk Factors for Relapse of Childhood B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020, 26, e923271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  6. Junk, S.V.; Förster, A.; Schmidt, G.; Zimmermann, M.; Fedders, B.; Haermeyer, B.; Bergmann, A.K.; Möricke, A.; Cario, G.; Auber, B.; et al. Germline variants in patients developing second malignant neoplasms after therapy for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia-a case-control study. Leukemia 2024, 38, 887–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  7. Choed-Amphai, C.; Khorana, J.; Sathitsamitphong, L.; Natesirinilkul, R.; Charoenkwan, P. Predictive factors for L-asparaginase hypersensitivity in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Int. J. Hematol. 2024, 119, 442–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Daub, J.T.; Amini, S.; Kersjes, D.J.E.; Ma, X.; Jäger, N.; Zhang, J.; Pfister, S.M.; Holstege, F.C.P.; Kemmeren, P. A systematic analysis of genetic interactions and their underlying biology in childhood cancer. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  9. Al-Mahayri, Z.N.; AlAhmad, M.M.; Ali, B.R. Long-Term Effects of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Chemotherapy: Can Recent Findings Inform Old Strategies? Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 710163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  10. Clough, E.; Barrett, T.; Wilhite, S.E.; Ledoux, P.; Evangelista, C.; Kim, I.F.; Tomashevsky, M.; Marshall, K.A.; Phillippy, K.H.; Sherman, P.M.; et al. NCBI GEO: Archive for gene expression and epigenomics data sets: 23-year update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, D138–D144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  11. Katz, K.; Shutov, O.; Lapoint, R.; Kimelman, M.; Brister, J.R.; O’Sullivan, C. The Sequence Read Archive: A decade more of explosive growth. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, D387–D390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  12. Saint Fleur-Lominy, S.; Evensen, N.A.; Bhatla, T.; Sethia, G.; Narang, S.; Choi, J.H.; Ma, X.; Yang, J.J.; Kelly, S.; Raetz, E.; et al. Evolution of the Epigenetic Landscape in Childhood B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Its Role in Drug Resistance. Cancer Res. 2020, 80, 5189–5202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  13. Autry, R.J.; Paugh, S.W.; Carter, R.; Shi, L.; Liu, J.; Ferguson, D.C.; Lau, C.E.; Bonten, E.J.; Yang, W.; McCorkle, J.R.; et al. Integrative genomic analyses reveal mechanisms of glucocorticoid resistance in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat. Cancer 2020, 1, 329–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  14. Neveu, B.; Spinella, J.F.; Richer, C.; Lagacé, K.; Cassart, P.; Lajoie, M.; Jananji, S.; Drouin, S.; Healy, J.; Hickson, G.R.X.; et al. CLIC5: A novel ETV6 target gene in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 2016, 101, 1534–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  15. Black, K.L.; Naqvi, A.S.; Asnani, M.; Hayer, K.E.; Yang, S.Y.; Gillespie, E.; Bagashev, A.; Pillai, V.; Tasian, S.K.; Gazzara, M.R.; et al. Aberrant splicing in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 11357–11369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  16. Shangguan, S.; Ehrenberg, P.K.; Geretz, A.; Yum, L.; Kundu, G.; May, K.; Fourati, S.; Nganou-Makamdop, K.; Williams, L.D.; Sawant, S.; et al. Monocyte-derived transcriptome signature indicates antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis as a potential mechanism of vaccine-induced protection against HIV-1. eLife 2021, 10, e69577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  17. Panwar, B.; Schmiedel, B.J.; Liang, S.; White, B.; Rodriguez, E.; Kalunian, K.; McKnight, A.J.; Soloff, R.; Seumois, G.; Vijayanand, P.; et al. Multi-cell type gene coexpression network analysis reveals coordinated interferon response and cross-cell type correlations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Genome Res. 2021, 31, 659–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  18. Orjuela, S.; Huang, R.; Hembach, K.M.; Robinson, M.D.; Soneson, C. ARMOR: An utomated eproducible MOdular Workflow for Preprocessing and Differential Analysis of NA-seq Data. G3 2019, 9, 2089–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  19. Patro, R.; Duggal, G.; Love, M.I.; Irizarry, R.A.; Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 417–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  20. Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  21. Wu, D.; Smyth, G.K. Camera: A competitive gene set test accounting for inter-gene correlation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  22. Tarca, A.L.; Draghici, S.; Khatri, P.; Hassan, S.S.; Mittal, P.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, C.J.; Kusanovic, J.P.; Romero, R. A novel signaling pathway impact analysis. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  23. Rapier-Sharman, N.; Clancy, J.; Pickett, B.E. Joint Secondary Transcriptomic Analysis of Non-Hodgkin’s B-Cell Lymphomas Predicts Reliance on Pathways Associated with the Extracellular Matrix and Robust Diagnostic Biomarkers. J. Bioinform. Syst. Biol. 2022, 5, 119–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  24. Scott, T.M.; Solis-Leal, A.; Lopez, J.B.; Robison, R.A.; Berges, B.K.; Pickett, B.E. Comparison of Intracellular Transcriptional Response of NHBE Cells to Infection with SARS-CoV-2 Washington and New York Strains. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 1009328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  25. Dobbs Spendlove, M.; MGibson, T.; McCain, S.; Stone, B.C.; Gill, T.; Pickett, B.E. Pathway2Targets: An open-source pathway-based approach to repurpose therapeutic drugs and prioritize human targets. PeerJ 2023, 11, e16088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  26. Scott, T.M.; Jensen, S.; Pickett, B.E. A signaling pathway-driven bioinformatics pipeline for predicting therapeutics against emerging infectious diseases. F1000Research 2021, 10, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  27. McHale, C.M.; Zhang, L.; Lan, Q.; Li, G.; Hubbard, A.E.; Forrest, M.S.; Vermeulen, R.; Chen, J.; Shen, M.; Rappaport, S.M.; et al. Changes in the peripheral blood transcriptome associated with occupational benzene exposure identified by cross-comparison on two microarray platforms. Genomics 2009, 93, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  28. Kuang, S.Q.; Bai, H.; Fang, Z.H.; Lopez, G.; Yang, H.; Tong, W.; Wang, Z.Z.; Garcia-Manero, G. Aberrant DNA methylation and epigenetic inactivation of Eph receptor tyrosine kinases and ephrin ligands in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2010, 115, 2412–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  29. Phan, N.N.; Liu, S.; Wang, C.Y.; Hsu, H.P.; Lai, M.D.; Li, C.Y.; Chen, C.F.; Chiao, C.C.; Yen, M.C.; Sun, Z.; et al. Overexpressed gene signature of EPH receptor A/B family in cancer patients-comprehensive analyses from the public high-throughput database. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2020, 13, 1220–1242. [Google Scholar] [PubMed Central]
  30. Xia, J.; Wang, M.; Zhu, Y.; Bu, C.; Li, T. Differential mRNA and long noncoding RNA expression profiles in pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. BMC Pediatr. 2022, 22, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  31. Figueroa, M.E.; Chen, S.C.; Andersson, A.K.; Phillips, L.A.; Li, Y.; Sotzen, J.; Kundu, M.; Downing, J.R.; Melnick, A.; Mullighan, C.G. Integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 3099–3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  32. Yin, Z.; Liao, M.; Yan, R.; Li, G.; Ou, R.; Liu, Z.; Zhong, Q.; Shen, H.; Zhu, Y.; Xie, S.; et al. Transcriptome- and metabolome-based candidate mechanism of BCR-ABL-independent resistance to olverembatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2023, 23, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Messina, M.; Chiaretti, S.; Tavolaro, S.; Peragine, N.; Vitale, A.; Elia, L.; Sica, S.; Levis, A.; Guarini, A.; Foà, R. Protein kinase gene expression profiling and in vitro functional experiments identify novel potential therapeutic targets in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer 2010, 116, 3426–3437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, L.-L.; Tang, X.; Zhou, G.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Chen, F.; Li, T.; Wen, F.; Liu, S.; Mai, H. PROM1 and CTGF Expression in Childhood -Rearrangement Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J. Oncol. 2022, 2022, 5896022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  35. Zinngrebe, J.; Schlichtig, F.; Kraus, J.M.; Meyer, M.; Boldrin, E.; Kestler, H.A.; Meyer, L.H.; Fischer-Posovszky, P.; Debatin, K.M. Biomarker profile for prediction of response to SMAC mimetic monotherapy in pediatric precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Int. J. Cancer 2020, 146, 3219–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Petrov, I.; Suntsova, M.; Mutorova, O.; Sorokin, M.; Garazha, A.; Ilnitskaya, E.; Spirin, P.; Larin, S.; Kovalchuk, O.; Prassolov, V.; et al. Molecular pathway activation features of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblast leukemia (ALL) cells. Aging 2016, 8, 2936–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  37. Mura, M.; Swain, R.K.; Zhuang, X.; Vorschmitt, H.; Reynolds, G.; Durant, S.; Beesley, J.F.J.; Herbert, J.M.J.; Sheldon, H.; Andre, M.; et al. Identification and angiogenic role of the novel tumor endothelial marker CLEC14A. Oncogene 2012, 31, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kühnl, A.; Gökbuget, N.; Stroux, A.; Burmeister, T.; Neumann, M.; Heesch, S.; Haferlach, T.; Hoelzer, D.; Hofmann, W.K.; Thiel, E.; et al. High BAALC expression predicts chemoresistance in adult B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2010, 115, 3737–3744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chang, T.Y.; Lan, K.C.; Chiu, C.Y.; Sheu, M.L.; Liu, S.H. ANGPTL1 attenuates cancer migration, invasion, and stemness through regulating FOXO3a-mediated SOX2 expression in colorectal cancer. Clin. Sci. 2022, 136, 657–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  40. Kuo, T.C.; Tan, C.T.; Chang, Y.W.; Hong, C.C.; Lee, W.J.; Chen, M.W.; Jeng, Y.M.; Chiou, J.; Yu, P.; Chen, P.S.; et al. Angiopoietin-like protein 1 suppresses SLUG to inhibit cancer cell motility. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 1082–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  41. Chen, H.A.; Kuo, T.C.; Tseng, C.F.; Ma, J.T.; Yang, S.T.; Yen, C.J.; Yang, C.Y.; Sung, S.Y.; Su, J.L. Angiopoietin-like protein 1 antagonizes MET receptor activity to repress sorafenib resistance and cancer stemness in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2016, 64, 1637–1651, Erratum in Hepatology 2017, 65, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bacher, U.; Schnittger, S.; Grüneisen, A.; Haferlach, T.; Kern, W.; Haferlach, C. Inverted duplication dup(1)(q32q21) as sole aberration in lymphoid and myeloid malignancies. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 2009, 188, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Goud, T.M.; Al Salmani, K.K.; Al Harasi, S.M.; Al Musalhi, M.; Wasifuddin, S.M.; Rajab, A. Importance of FISH combined with Morphology, Immunophenotype and Cytogenetic Analysis of Childhood/ Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Omani Patients. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2015, 16, 7343–7350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Camper, L.; Heinegârd, D.; Lundgren-Akerlund, E. Integrin alpha2beta1 is a receptor for the cartilage matrix protein chondroadherin. J. Cell Biol. 1997, 138, 1159–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  45. Lee, B.M.; Buck-Koehntop, B.A.; Martinez-Yamout, M.A.; Dyson, H.J.; Wright, P.E. Embryonic neural inducing factor churchill is not a DNA-binding zinc finger protein: Solution structure reveals a solvent-exposed beta-sheet and zinc binuclear cluster. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 371, 1274–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  46. Sousa, S.F.; Fernandes, P.A.; Ramos, M.J. Farnesyltransferase--new insights into the zinc-coordination sphere paradigm: Evidence for a carboxylate-shift mechanism. Biophys. J. 2005, 88, 483–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  47. Hu, X.; Cao, P.; Wang, F.; Zhang, H.; Wang, T.; Liu, H.; Wu, X. Lengthening of the CHURC1 3′ untranslated region by alternative polyadenylation is associated with the progression of acute myeloid leukemia. Genes Dis. 2025, 12, 101248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  48. Liu, Z.; Zhou, J.; Wu, S.; Chen, Z.; Wu, S.; Chen, L.; Zhu, X.; Li, Z. Why Treg should be the focus of cancer immunotherapy: The latest thought. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 168, 115142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Fernández-Martínez, J.L.; DeAndrés-Galiana, E.J.; Cernea, A. The Effect of NOP16 Mutation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. J. Mol. Genet. Med. 2017, 11, 1000295. Available online: https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/the-effect-of-nop16-mutation-in-chronic-lymphocytic-leukemia-1747-0862-1000295-95280.html (accessed on 3 February 2025).
  50. Oliveira, T.; Zhang, M.; Joo, E.J.; Abdel-Azim, H.; Chen, C.W.; Yang, L.; Chou, C.H.; Qin, X.; Chen, J.; Alagesan, K.; et al. Glycoproteome remodeling in MLL-rearranged B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Theranostics 2021, 11, 9519–9537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  51. Perez-Atayde, A.R.; Sallan, S.E.; Tedrow, U.; Connors, S.; Allred, E.; Folkman, J. Spectrum of tumor angiogenesis in the bone marrow of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am. J. Pathol. 1997, 150, 815–821. [Google Scholar] [PubMed Central]
  52. Ruan, Y.; Kim, H.N.; Ogana, H.A.; Gang, E.J.; Li, S.; Liu, H.C.; Bhojwani, D.; Wayne, A.S.; Yang, M.; Kim, Y.M. In vitro and in vivo effects of AVA4746, a novel competitive antagonist of the ligand binding of VLA-4, in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Exp. Ther. Med. 2022, 23, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  53. Gang, E.J.; Kim, H.N.; Hsieh, Y.T.; Ruan, Y.; Ogana, H.A.; Lee, S.; Pham, J.; Geng, H.; Park, E.; Klemm, L.; et al. Integrin α6 mediates the drug resistance of acute lymphoblastic B-cell leukemia. Blood 2020, 136, 210–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  54. Rapier-Sharman, N.; Kim, S.; Mudrow, M.; Told, M.T.; Fischer, L.; Fawson, L.; Parry, J.; Poole, B.D.; O’Neill, K.L.; Piccolo, S.R.; et al. Comparison of B-Cell Lupus and Lymphoma Using a Novel Immune Imbalance Transcriptomics Algorithm Reveals Potential Therapeutic Targets. Genes 2024, 15, 1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  55. Yu, X.; Chen, Y.; Chen, J.; Fan, Y.; Lu, H.; Wu, D.; Xu, Y. Shared genetic architecture between autoimmune disorders and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Insights from large-scale genome-wide cross-trait analysis. BMC Med. 2024, 22, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  56. Deng, W.; Xu, Y.; Yuan, X. Clinical features and prognosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children with Epstein-Barr virus infection. Transl. Pediatr. 2022, 11, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  57. Cairo, M.S. EBV: The virus that keeps on giving! Blood 2023, 141, 689–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Gallardo-Zapata, J.; Pérez-Figueroa, E.; Olivar-López, V.; Medina-Sansón, A.; Jiménez-Hernández, E.; Ortega, E.; Maldonado-Bernal, C. TLR Agonists Modify NK Cell Activation and Increase Its Cytotoxicity in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  59. Bai, L.; Zhou, L.; Han, W.; Chen, J.; Gu, X.; Hu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Li, W.; Zhang, X.; Niu, C.; et al. BAX as the mediator of C-MYC sensitizes acute lymphoblastic leukemia to TLR9 agonists. J. Transl. Med. 2023, 21, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  60. Sánchez-Herrera, D.; Contreras-Ramos, A.; Jiménez-Hernández, E.; Medina-Sansón, A.; Giono-Cerezo, S.; Maldonado-Bernal, C. NK Cell Subpopulation Is Altered and the Expression of TLR1 and TLR9 Is Decreased in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J. Oncol. 2021, 2021, 5528378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  61. Canevarolo, R.R.; Cury, N.M.; Yunes, J.A. The Expression and Activation of the NF-κB Pathway Correlate with Methotrexate Resistance and Cell Proliferation in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Genes 2023, 14, 1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  62. Dai, Q.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Y.; Ye, L.; Shi, R.; Peng, L.; Guo, S.; He, J.; Yang, H.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Cytokine network imbalance in children with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia at diagnosis. Cytokine 2023, 169, 156267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Lejman, M.; Kuśmierczuk, K.; Bednarz, K.; Ostapińska, K.; Zawitkowska, J. Targeted Therapy in the Treatment of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Therapy and Toxicity Mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  64. Ivanov, A.V.; Alecsa, M.S.; Popescu, R.; Starcea, M.I.; Mocanu, A.M.; Rusu, C.; Miron, I.C. Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Emerging Therapies-From Pathway to Target. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  65. Jędraszek, K.; Malczewska, M.; Parysek-Wójcik, K.; Lejman, M. Resistance Mechanisms in Pediatric B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  66. Dander, E.; Palmi, C.; D’Amico, G.; Cazzaniga, G. The Bone Marrow Niche in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: The Role of Microenvironment from Pre-Leukemia to Overt Leukemia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  67. Kugler, E. Charting a path through resistance: Histone deacetylase inhibitors for TP53-mutated B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 2024, 109, 1643–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  68. Fidyt, K.; Pastorczak, A.; Cyran, J.; Crump, N.T.; Goral, A.; Madzio, J.; Muchowicz, A.; Poprzeczko, M.; Domka, K.; Komorowski, L.; et al. Potent, p53-independent induction of NOXA sensitizes MLL-rearranged B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells to venetoclax. Oncogene 2022, 41, 1600–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  69. Grüninger, P.K.; Uhl, F.; Herzog, H.; Gentile, G.; Andrade-Martinez, M.; Schmidt, T.; Han, K.; Morgens, D.W.; Bassik, M.C.; Cleary, M.L.; et al. Functional characterization of the PI3K/AKT/MTOR signaling pathway for targeted therapy in B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Gene Ther. 2022, 29, 1751–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  70. Hohtari, H.; Kankainen, M.; Adnan-Awad, S.; Yadav, B.; Potdar, S.; Ianevski, A.; Dufva, O.; Heckman, C.; Sexl, V.; Kytölä, S.; et al. Targeting Apoptosis Pathways with BCL2 and MDM2 Inhibitors in Adult B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Hemasphere 2022, 6, e701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  71. Narang, S.; Ghebrechristos, Y.; Evensen, N.A.; Murrell, N.; Jasinski, S.; Ostrow, T.H.; Teachey, D.T.; Raetz, E.A.; Lionnet, T.; Witkowski, M.; et al. Clonal evolution of the 3D chromatin landscape in patients with relapsed pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 7425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  72. Isobe, T.; Takagi, M.; Sato-Otsubo, A.; Nishimura, A.; Nagae, G.; Yamagishi, C.; Tamura, M.; Tanaka, Y.; Asada, S.; Takeda, R.; et al. Multi-omics analysis defines highly refractory RAS burdened immature subgroup of infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  73. Khanolkar, A.; Liu, G.; Simpson Schneider, B.M. Defining the Basal and Immunomodulatory Mediator-Induced Phosphoprotein Signature in Pediatric B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL) Diagnostic Samples. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  74. Bellaye, P.S.; Georgievski, A.; Ballerini, P.; Bouslama, B.; Richard, C.; Boidot, R.; Chevreux, G.; Legros, V.; Guy, J.; Racine, J.; et al. CD40 Agonist on Patient-Derived Xenograft Mice for the Treatment of B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res. 2025, 31, 181–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Rios de Los Rios, J.; Enciso, J.; Vilchis-Ordoñez, A.; Vázquez-Ramírez, R.; Ramirez-Ramirez, D.; Balandrán, J.C.; Rodríguez-Martínez, A.; Ruiz-Tachiquín, M.; Pompa-Mera, E.; Mendoza, L.; et al. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia-secreted miRNAs induce a proinflammatory microenvironment and promote the activation of hematopoietic progenitors. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2022, 112, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Fu, Z.; Li, S.; Han, S.; Shi, C.; Zhang, Y. Antibody drug conjugate: The “biological missile” for targeted cancer therapy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  77. Qi, H.; Chi, L.; Wang, X.; Jin, X.; Wang, W.; Lan, J. Identification of a Seven-lncRNA-mRNA Signature for Recurrence and Prognostic Prediction in Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Based on WGCNA and LASSO Analyses. Anal. Cell. Pathol. 2021, 2021, 6692022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  78. Ohtsuka, T.; Shiomi, T.; Shimoda, M.; Kodama, T.; Amour, A.; Murphy, G.; Ohuchi, E.; Kobayashi, K.; Okada, Y. ADAM28 is overexpressed in human non-small cell lung carcinomas and correlates with cell proliferation and lymph node metastasis. Int. J. Cancer 2006, 118, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Wei, L.; Wen, J.-Y.; Chen, J.; Ma, X.-K.; Wu, D.-H.; Chen, Z.-H.; Huang, J.-L. Oncogenic ADAM28 induces gemcitabine resistance and predicts a poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 25, 5590–5603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  80. Yin, Q.; Gu, J.; Qi, Y.; Lu, Y.; Yang, L.; Liu, J.; Liang, X. ADAM28 from both endothelium and gastric cancer cleaves von Willebrand Factor to eliminate von Willebrand Factor-induced apoptosis of gastric cancer cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021, 898, 173994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Gérard, C.; Hubeau, C.; Carnet, O.; Bellefroid, M.; Sounni, N.E.; Blacher, S.; Bendavid, G.; Moser, M.; Fässler, R.; Noel, A.; et al. Microenvironment-derived ADAM28 prevents cancer dissemination. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 37185–37199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  82. Wang, J.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Yan, X.; Zhang, D.; Ma, X.; Du, Y.; Liu, X.; Yang, Y. MicroRNA-552 enhances metastatic capacity of colorectal cancer cells by targeting a disintegrin and metalloprotease 28. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 70194–70210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed Central]
  83. Zhang, J.-M.; Wang, C.-C.; Zhang, G.-C.; Jiang, Q.; Yang, S.-M.; Fu, H.-X.; Wang, Q.-M.; Zhu, X.-L.; Zhu, H.-H.; Jiang, H.; et al. ADAM28 promotes tumor growth and dissemination of acute myeloid leukemia through IGFBP-3 degradation and IGF-I-induced cell proliferation. Cancer Lett. 2019, 442, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zhang, X.-H.; Wang, C.-C.; Jiang, Q.; Yang, S.-M.; Jiang, H.; Lu, J.; Wang, Q.-M.; Feng, F.-E.; Zhu, X.-L.; Zhao, T.; et al. ADAM28 overexpression regulated via the PI3K/Akt pathway is associated with relapse in de novo adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk. Res. 2015, 39, 1229–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Dimensional reduction analyses of all samples. (Upper Panel) Principal component analysis (PCA) of all samples. B-ALL samples (red) and healthy control samples (blue) show the variance-based differences between the phenotypes. (Lower Panel) UMAP plot with control samples clustering towards the Y-axis and B-ALL samples being more diverse and further from the Y-axis. Phenotypes for control cells include early B-cells (Control_EarlyB), pediatric early B-cells (Control_EarlyB_ped), immature B-cells (Control_ImmatureB), pediatric immature B-cells (Control_ImmatureB_ped), pre-B cells (Control_PreB), pediatric pre-B cells (Control_PreB_ped), pro-B cells (Control_ProB), and pediatric Pro-B cells (Control_ProB_ped).
Figure 1. Dimensional reduction analyses of all samples. (Upper Panel) Principal component analysis (PCA) of all samples. B-ALL samples (red) and healthy control samples (blue) show the variance-based differences between the phenotypes. (Lower Panel) UMAP plot with control samples clustering towards the Y-axis and B-ALL samples being more diverse and further from the Y-axis. Phenotypes for control cells include early B-cells (Control_EarlyB), pediatric early B-cells (Control_EarlyB_ped), immature B-cells (Control_ImmatureB), pediatric immature B-cells (Control_ImmatureB_ped), pre-B cells (Control_PreB), pediatric pre-B cells (Control_PreB_ped), pro-B cells (Control_ProB), and pediatric Pro-B cells (Control_ProB_ped).
Cimb 47 00699 g001
Figure 2. Volcano plot of B-ALL DEGs. Labels are included for the top 20 most statistically significant protein-coding genes that were either upregulated (red) or downregulated (blue). Higher values on the Y-axis represent more significant p-values, while the X-axis represents positive (right) or negative (left) log2 fold-change values.
Figure 2. Volcano plot of B-ALL DEGs. Labels are included for the top 20 most statistically significant protein-coding genes that were either upregulated (red) or downregulated (blue). Higher values on the Y-axis represent more significant p-values, while the X-axis represents positive (right) or negative (left) log2 fold-change values.
Cimb 47 00699 g002
Table 1. Top 10 upregulated protein-coding DEGs together with false discovery rate-adjusted p-value (FDR p-value) calculated in the B-ALL vs. healthy control comparison, sorted in decreasing order by positive log2 fold-change values.
Table 1. Top 10 upregulated protein-coding DEGs together with false discovery rate-adjusted p-value (FDR p-value) calculated in the B-ALL vs. healthy control comparison, sorted in decreasing order by positive log2 fold-change values.
Gene SymbolGene Namelog2FC 1FDR 2
HIST2H2AA3histone cluster 2 H2A family member a315.41.20 × 10−31
EPHA7EPH receptor A7137.63 × 10−22
NPR1natriuretic peptide receptor 112.93.69 × 10−26
DIPK1Cdivergent protein kinase domain 1C12.84.31 × 10−22
HIST1H3Bhistone cluster 1 H3 family member b12.61.49 × 10−85
CLEC14AC-type lectin domain containing 14A12.61.28 × 10−20
S100A16S100 calcium binding protein A1612.43.06 × 10−18
OVCH2ovochymase 2 (gene/pseudogene)122.14 × 10−17
ERGETS transcription factor ERG11.81.16 × 100−67
GREM1gremlin 1, DAN family BMP antagonist11.49.29 × 100−10
1 log2 fold change. 2 false discovery rate-corrected p-value.
Table 2. Top 10 downregulated protein-coding DEGs together with false discovery rate-adjusted p-value (FDR p-value) calculated in the B-ALL vs. healthy control comparison, sorted in increasing order by negative log2 fold-change values.
Table 2. Top 10 downregulated protein-coding DEGs together with false discovery rate-adjusted p-value (FDR p-value) calculated in the B-ALL vs. healthy control comparison, sorted in increasing order by negative log2 fold-change values.
Gene SymbolGene Namelog2FC 1FDR 2
IGHA1immunoglobulin heavy constant alpha 1−9.569.11 × 10−91
ANGPTL1angiopoietin like 1−9.062.38 × 10−94
IGKV1-39immunoglobulin kappa variable 1–39 (gene/pseudogene)−8.482.43 × 10−65
GLYATL1Bglycine-N-acyltransferase like 1B−8.224.93 × 10−109
CHADchondroadherin−8.221.48 × 10−87
CHURC1-FNTBCHURC1-FNTB readthrough−8.23.11 × 10−59
IGKV3D-11immunoglobulin kappa variable 3D-11−8.083.67 × 10−75
AC011511.4novel transcript−7.946.39 × 10−72
IGKV2D-28immunoglobulin kappa variable 2D-28−7.872.33 × 10−73
ABHD16Babhydrolase domain containing 16B−7.731.25 × 10−102
1 log2 fold change. 2 false discovery rate-corrected p-value.
Table 3. Intracellular signaling pathways that were significantly enriched in DEGs.
Table 3. Intracellular signaling pathways that were significantly enriched in DEGs.
NameNumber of Proteins in PathwayNumber of DEGs in PathwayFDR p-ValuePathway Regulation StatusSource Database
Integrins in angiogenesis54408.565 × 10−3ActivatedNCI
Antigen processing and presentation63557.797 × 10−4InhibitedKEGG
Calcium signaling pathway1341023.862 × 10−3ActivatedKEGG
Systemic lupus erythematosus1191092.521 × 10−2ActivatedKEGG
NF-kappa B signaling pathway85764.272 × 10−2InhibitedKEGG
Toll-like receptor signaling pathway85764.354 × 10−2InhibitedKEGG
Tight junction105974.354 × 10−2ActivatedKEGG
Epstein–Barr virus infection1951594.449 × 10−2InhibitedKEGG
Table 4. Highest-ranked 10 therapeutic target proteins to potentially be repurposed for B-ALL.
Table 4. Highest-ranked 10 therapeutic target proteins to potentially be repurposed for B-ALL.
Target SymbolTarget NameSubcellular LocationWeighted Score
TNFtumor necrosis factorCell membrane3870
IL6interleukin 6Secreted3287.5
TP53tumor protein p53Cytoplasm3177
EGFRepidermal growth factor receptorCell membrane2562
CD40LGCD40 ligandCell membrane2490
AKT1AKT serine/threonine kinase 1Cytoplasm2323.5
PIK3CAphosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alphaCytosol2301
PTGS2prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2Microsome membrane2288
PIK3CBphosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit betaCytoplasm2228
PIK3CDphosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit deltaCytoplasm2142
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wilkins, M.R.K.; Pickett, B.E. Histone-, Receptor-, and Integrin-Related Gene Products and ADAM28 as Relevant to B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL). Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47090699

AMA Style

Wilkins MRK, Pickett BE. Histone-, Receptor-, and Integrin-Related Gene Products and ADAM28 as Relevant to B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL). Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2025; 47(9):699. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47090699

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wilkins, Makayla R. K., and Brett E. Pickett. 2025. "Histone-, Receptor-, and Integrin-Related Gene Products and ADAM28 as Relevant to B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 47, no. 9: 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47090699

APA Style

Wilkins, M. R. K., & Pickett, B. E. (2025). Histone-, Receptor-, and Integrin-Related Gene Products and ADAM28 as Relevant to B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL). Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 47(9), 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47090699

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop