Next Article in Journal
Transcriptomic Analysis of the Negative Effect of Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate from Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis) on Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation Efficiency
Previous Article in Journal
The Application and Molecular Mechanisms of Mitochondria-Targeted Antioxidants in Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiac Injury
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Volatile Metabolome and Transcriptome in Sweet Basil Under Drought Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Chemical Seed Priming: Molecules and Mechanisms for Enhancing Plant Germination, Growth, and Stress Tolerance

by
Mason T. MacDonald
* and
Vijaya R. Mohan
Department of Plant, Food and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Bible Hill, NS B2N 5E3, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47(3), 177; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47030177
Submission received: 10 January 2025 / Revised: 28 February 2025 / Accepted: 6 March 2025 / Published: 7 March 2025

Abstract

:
Food security is one of the world’s top challenges, specifically considering global issues like climate change. Seed priming is one strategy to improve crop production, typically via increased germination, yields, and/or stress tolerance. Hydropriming, or soaking seeds in water only, is the simplest form of seed priming. However, the addition of certain seed priming agents has resulted in a variety of modified strategies, including osmopriming, halopriming, hormonal priming, PGR priming, nutripriming, and others. Most current research has focused on hormonal and nutripriming. This review will focus on the specific compounds that have been used most often over the past 3 years and the physiological effects that they have had on crops. Over half of recent research has focused on four compounds: (1) salicylic acid, (2) zinc, (3) gibberellic acid, and (4) potassium nitrate. One of the most interesting characteristics of all chemical seed priming agents is that they are exposed only to seeds yet confer benefits throughout plant development. In some cases, such benefits have been passed to subsequent generations, suggesting an epigenetic effect, which is supported by observed changes in DNA methylation and histone modification. This review will summarize the current state of knowledge on molecular changes and physiological mechanisms associated with chemical seed priming agents and discuss avenues for future research.

1. Introduction

Climate change is posing a significant challenge to agriculture and food security. The average global temperature has increased by 1.41 °C since the preindustrial period [1], which has contributed to an increased frequency of extreme weather events [2,3,4]. Such environmental changes are adversely affecting the yields of many crops [5,6,7]. For example, wheat yields are expected to decrease by 4–6% for every degree increase in global temperature [8,9]. A meta-analysis of future wheat yields predicted decreases of 18% and 31% due to temperature and drought stress, respectively [10]. The future risk to food security posed by climate change necessitates the exploration of strategies to increase growth and stress tolerance.
Seed priming has high potential to promote crop resilience to climate change. At its most basic level, seed priming involves soaking seeds in water to promote germination [11]. However, seed priming technologies have improved to include a variety of chemical and non-chemical agents (Figure 1). These seed priming agents (SPAs) are intended to promote germination, growth, and/or stress tolerance in developing plants [12,13,14]. The focus of this review is on chemical seed priming as opposed to non-chemical priming. Many chemicals have been used as SPAs, such as ascorbic acid [12], salicylic acid (SA) [15], glycinebetaine [15], benzimidazoles [16], pyroligneous acid [17], and other naturally occurring antioxidants [18]. Such chemical SPAs can be broadly classified as osmotic chemicals, salts, hormones, plant growth regulators, antioxidants, and nutrients [13,19,20].
One of the primary reasons for seed priming is to improve seed germination. Seed germination is a crucial part of a plant’s life cycle and is particularly susceptible to environmental stress [21]. Priming seeds improves germination, emergence, field uniformity, and seed vigor [22,23,24]. Specific details of physiological and molecular pathways continue to be discovered, but priming is known to activate critical metabolic processes within a seed, such as enzyme activation or resource mobilization, prior to radicle emergence [25].
Perhaps the most curious aspect of seed priming is that it triggers beneficial effects that persist in developing plants. Specific effects vary somewhat depending on the SPA but often include improvements in photosynthesis, nutrient content, oxidative stress regulation, and hormonal dynamics [13]. For example, broccoli seeds primed with 10 ppm ascorbic acid resulted in plants with an 84% increase in photosynthesis under irrigated conditions [12]. Those broccoli seedlings also exhibited improved drought tolerance when water was withheld, maintaining photosynthesis at similar rates to irrigated non-primed seedlings [12]. Improvements in photosynthesis and stress tolerance have inevitably led to increased yields in several studies [12,26,27], though improvements in yields have not always occurred in outdoor field trials [28]. Still, the possibility of increasing yields through inexpensive seed preconditioning techniques has justified research into the modes of action of SPAs. The objective of this review is to describe seed priming techniques, with an emphasis on the common chemicals used. This review will identify SPAs that have been studied most often in the past 3 years. This review will also describe what is known about chemical SPA molecular biology (with an emphasis on “omics” approaches), gaps in our understanding, and areas needed for future research.

2. Seed Priming Techniques

Seed priming is a method where seeds imbibe water, typically in the presence of a priming agent or other specifically imposed conditions [29,30]. The method is relatively short in duration, allowing a seed to reach a pre-germinative metabolism but stops before reaching full germination [31]. Germination occurs in three phases. Phase 1 involves rapid imbibition of water due to differences in water potential of a seed and its surroundings, phase 2 begins with the activation of seed metabolic processes, and phase 3 involves rapid uptake of water culminating in radicle protrusion [32]. Seed priming lasts only long enough to enter phase 2, ending before reaching phase 3 [33]. When used effectively, seed priming promotes germination or stress mitigation in cultivated species [34]. Although the priming duration is short, benefits can last for the entire life cycle of the plant [34] or possibly be passed to offspring [16].
Seed priming techniques can be broadly classified as chemical and non-chemical priming. This review will focus on the SPAs associated with chemical priming. However, non-chemical priming will be discussed briefly as they include some of the original priming methods before various SPAs were identified.

2.1. Non-Chemical Priming

Hydropriming is the simplest form of seed priming, considered to be the pragmatic approach because it is cost-effective, safe, and eco-friendly [35]. Hydroprimed seeds are simply soaked in water, which allows seeds to go through their usual germination phases [20]. It is the duration of priming that is the critical factor for hydropriming. Seeds should only be primed long enough to initiate normal metabolic processes, which makes it difficult to create a universal procedure [35]. For example, optimum response is achieved with 96 h of priming in onions [36], but can be achieved in as little as 7 h in pinto beans [37].
There are several other non-chemical priming methods. Thermopriming exposes seeds to high or low temperatures [38,39], biological priming combines imbibition with microbial inoculation [19,40], and solid matrix priming treats seeds with a known combination of water and solid material [20,41]. There has been increasing interest in other non-chemical priming techniques, such as magnetopriming, which involves passing seeds through a magnetic field [42,43]. A review by Farooq et al. [29] elaborates on the potential of non-chemical priming methods.

2.2. Chemical Priming

If hydropriming is the incubation of seeds with water alone, then chemical priming offers a logical next step by incubating seeds with virtually any compound (often dissolved or diluted in water) [44]. Many substances used for chemical priming are naturally occurring, such as plant extracts, chitosan, phytohormones, plant growth regulators, sugars, or polyamines [44]. The classification of chemical SPAs varies slightly from study to study, but a general classification scheme can be seen in Figure 1.
Chemical priming works by exposing seeds to stimuli beyond simple imbibition [45,46]. One of the earlier examples of chemical priming involved priming cress and lettuce seeds in sea water (an early example of halopriming) to improve germination [47,48]. More modern tests use nutrient solutions to prime tomato seeds [49] and kickstarted studies on many different potential SPAs [14,20,21]. In the past 3 years alone, there have been at least 64 different SPAs included in peer-reviewed studies (Supplementary Materials File S1). Most of the studies focused on nutripriming and plant growth regulator (PGR) priming, followed by halopriming and hormone priming (Figure 2). The objective of this section is to briefly describe the types of chemical priming most often studied before focusing on specific SPAs.

2.2.1. Osmopriming

Osmopriming is the general term for soaking seeds in a solution with low water potential [20]. By that definition, most chemical SPAs could be considered osmoprimers. However, osmopriming more often refers to sugar solutions such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), glycerol, sorbitol, or mannitol [20]. The most common osmoprimer studied in the past 3 years is PEG, which agrees with the previous literature [50].
Osmopriming introduces several more advantages than hydropriming alone. First, osmopriming results in earlier germination and seedling emergence [14]. Second, effects from osmopriming tend to continue throughout plant development long after germination [50,51]. Finally, osmopriming offers a better improvement in stress tolerance [52,53].

2.2.2. Halopriming

Halopriming is performed by soaking pre-germinated seeds in inorganic salt solutions [54]. Several salts have been used historically, such as NaCl, Na2CO3, KCl, KNO3, CaCl2, and CaSO4 [54]. However, KNO3 and CaCl2 have been the most studied over the past 3 years, being included in 12% and 9% of all seed priming studies since 2022 (Table 1).
Water potential is greatly reduced during halopriming, which is comparable to osmopriming. However, there are two key distinctions between halo- and osmopriming. The first is that osmotic adjustment is facilitated by adding a salt usually to distilled water [20]. The second is that the cation of the salt is often an essential element for plant growth, such as Ca2+ or K+ [54]. Still, there remains some overlap in the literature where halopriming agents will be described as osmopriming agents [14,21]. It may be best to consider halopriming as a subsect of osmopriming.

2.2.3. Hormonal Priming

Hormonal priming, sometimes referred to as hormopriming, refers to a strategy of soaking seeds in specific concentrations of phytohormones to elicit a response [55]. Phytohormones play significant roles in signaling pathways for normal physiological function but are also key mediators for stress responses [56,57,58]. The “classical five” phytohormones are gibberellic acid (GA), ethylene, auxin, cytokinins, and abscisic acid (ABA) [59]. Other compounds including jasmonates, brassinosteroids, and SA have since been regularly discussed as phytohormones [60,61,62]. These eight compounds are classified as hormonal primers for the purposes of this review. Other compounds, such as melatonin, are sometimes referred to as phytohormones [63] but currently remain classified as PGRs in this review.
Phytohormones may been separated into two categories. The first is hormones associated with growth promotion such as auxins, cytokinins, gibberellins, and brassinosteroids [62]. The second is hormones associated with stress tolerance such as ABA, jasmonic acid, and ethylene [64]. SA and GA are easily the most popular SPAs used for hormonal priming over the past 3 years, which together account for almost one-third of sampled SPA studies over the past 3 years (Table 1).

2.2.4. Plant Growth Regulator Priming

PGR priming is very similar to hormonal priming, to the extent that some papers use the terms interchangeably. Like other priming treatments, PGR priming involves soaking seeds in low concentrations of PGRs to elicit a positive response [65]. PGRs tend to be organic compounds that play vital roles in growth, expansion, and yield of plants even when present in small amounts [65]. PGRs may act as chemical messengers to regulate a range of cellular processes or help to coordinate complex signal transduction pathways during abiotic stress [66].
The phytohormones listed in Section 2.2.3 meet the definition of PGRs. But in much the same manner that not all fingers are thumbs, not all PGRs are phytohormones. Compounds such as tocopherols, polyamines, quaternary ammonium compounds, proline, trehalose, ascorbic acid, melatonin, and strigolactones are all considered PGRs, though they are not conventionally discussed as phytohormones [66,67]. Of these non-hormonal PGRs, melatonin and ascorbic acid have been studied most often as an SPA (Table 1).

2.2.5. Nutripriming

Nutripriming is performed by soaking seeds in solutions containing micro- or macronutrients [68]. Nutripriming combines the biochemical effect from hydropriming with the nutritional effect of whichever nutrient is used. Many nutrients have been used, either individually or in combinations [69]. For example, Mg, Zn, and B have all increased germination and yield of several crops [70,71,72]. However, Zn and Se have been studied most often and account for a quarter of all chemical SPA studies over the past 3 years (Table 1).

2.2.6. Other Chemical Priming

There are many other compounds used for seed priming that do not fall neatly into the more popular classifications. Chitosan, a bioactive polysaccharide molecule usually obtained from crustacean shells [73,74], is the most studied compound in the past 3 years that does not belong in the above classifications (Table 1). But turmeric [75], biochar [76], fluridone [77], essential oils [78], pyroligneous acid [79], H2O2 [80], and humic acid [81] have all demonstrated beneficial effects as SPAs in recent years. The use of H2O2 has been called redox priming in some papers, using direct exposure to free radicals to promote abiotic stress defense [80].
The use of plant extracts as SPAs is a research area that continues to develop. Plant extracts can contain a cocktail of phytochemicals, which are likely a blend of multiple classifications of SPA. Extracts from several different plants have been used. For example, Dawoud et al. [82] used extracts from pomegranate peels to prime cabbage seeds to improve growth characteristics. Meanwhile, El Sayed et al. [83] used extracts from cypress leaves to promote photosynthesis, growth, and antioxidant defense in zucchini. It is likely that there are many other plant extracts that could elicit a positive response.

3. Commonly Used SPAs and Their Effects

3.1. Salicylic Acid

SA (2-droxybenzoic acid) is potent phenolic signaling molecule and is widely involved in many physiological processes, such as germination, reproductive and vegetative growth, fruit ripening, and photosynthesis [84]. Further, SA is also involved in abiotic stress tolerance [85,86]. The multifunctional role of SA in plant physiology made it a desirable candidate for seed priming.
There are mixed results with respect to salicylic acid and germination. Several recent studies report an improvement in seed germination after SA priming [81,85,87,88,89,90], but not all had an experimental design capable of distinguishing whether SA offered any improvement beyond water alone. For instance, Ceritoglu et al. [90] found a significant increase in germination percentage and a decrease in germination time in lentils compared to an unprimed control but with no comparison to hydropriming. Meanwhile, Alam et al. [85] found no difference in the germination of cucumbers after priming with a 0.005% SA solution. There was also no improvement in the germination of rice seeds after priming with 10 mg L−1 or 20 mg L−1 SA versus hydropriming alone [89]. Conversely, priming with 0.2 mM SA increased germination in eggplant and sweet peppers [81]. Hydroprimed eggplant and sweet pepper seeds germinated at approximately 75 and 70%, respectively. Meanwhile, SA priming improved germination to approximately 92% in eggplant and 85% in sweet pepper [81]. Improvements in growth and yield due to SA seed priming have been much more consistent.

3.2. Zinc

Zn is a vital micronutrient for plants, and it plays a key role in essential cellular functions, including metabolism, physiological activities, and the regulation of ion homeostasis [91,92]. Zn plays an important role in photosynthesis by acting as a key component in chlorophyll synthesis [93]. It also plays a significant role in alleviating abiotic stresses such as salinity, drought, and extreme temperatures by minimizing oxidative damage [94]. This versatile nature of zinc in plant physiology makes it a potential seed priming agent.
Positive results have been observed in germination through Zn seed priming. Several recent studies have reported improved germination in rice, wheat, and spinach following Zn seed priming [71,95,96]. However, a study on corn indicated that both Zn and hydropriming enhanced germination [97]. Additionally, Zn seed priming was utilized in spinach to improve its germination rate and resistance to low-temperature stress during germination and early seedling development [95]. Zn seed priming has been shown to significantly improve crop performance across various plant species, including wheat, maize, and pea, particularly in Zn-deficient soils. In wheat, priming with 0.5 M ZnSO4 for 12 h enhanced seedling growth and establishment [96]. Similarly, maize seed priming with a 1% Zn solution for 16 h resulted in increased seedling weight, height, and Zn content, leading to a 27% increase in grain yield compared to non-primed seeds on calcareous, Zn-deficient soils in Pakistan [98]. In pea, priming with 1% ZnSO4 for 12 h improved yield-related traits such as pod length, number of pods per plant, and number of grains per pod, thereby enhancing overall green pea yield compared to hydroprimed seeds [99]. Overall, Zn priming treatments, particularly at optimal concentrations and durations, significantly boost seedling growth, yield attributes, and crop yield, making them a promising cost-effective agronomic tool for improving productivity.

3.3. Gibberellic Acid

Gibberellic acid (GA3) is a vital plant hormone influencing various stages of the plant life cycle [100]. Its functions include regulating seed germination, leaf expansion, stem elongation, flower and trichome initiation, source–sink dynamics and the development of flowers, fruits, and seed [100,101]. GA3 is categorized among the five classical plant hormones, alongside auxins, cytokinins, ABA, and ethylene, each of which influences specific physiological traits in plants [59]. GA3 is particularly notable for its role in controlling plant stature and alleviating seed dormancy [102,103]. At the molecular level, GA3 promotes plant elongation by regulating cell growth processes [102]. These multifaceted roles of GA3 in plant physiology make it an excellent seed priming agent.
GA3 priming has been widely studied across various crops, showing significant improvements in germination and growth-related traits. For instance, it enhanced seed germination rates, plant height, and overall biomass in Leymus chinensis [103]. In maize, GA3 priming increased germination percentage, reduced mean germination time, and improved seedling vigor under low-water-potential conditions [104]. Similarly, in tomato, optimal results were observed with GA3 priming at specific concentrations, enhancing germination rates, shoot and root lengths, and seed vigor [105].
Despite these findings, limited studies have evaluated GA3 priming effects through maturity or yield. Notably, GA3 priming improved growth traits under severe drought in rapeseed [106]. Under salinity stress, GA3 priming enhanced germination percentage, reduced germination time, and improved shoot and root length in crops like Zea mays L., Pisum sativum, and Lathyrus sativus [107]. Furthermore, GA3 priming enhanced germination, seedling dry weight, and antioxidant enzyme activity while reducing membrane damage in alfalfa [108]. In rice, it improved growth, chlorophyll content, and antioxidant capacity, alleviating salt-induced physiological stress [109].
The consistent improvements in germination and stress tolerance due to GA3 priming highlight its potential as an effective strategy for enhancing plant resilience and productivity under challenging conditions.

3.4. Potassium Nitrate

Potassium nitrate (KNO3) is an ionic salt composed of potassium ions (K⁺) and nitrate ions (NO3), and is widely used in seed priming due to its role as a major essential plant nutrient [110]. Studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in improving seed germination, seedling growth, and yield across various crops. For instance, KNO3 priming enhanced germination percentage, germination index, and reduced mean germination time in holy basil seeds [110], while rice seeds showed improved germination percentage, speed, and uniformity compared to untreated seeds [111]. Similarly, soybean seeds primed with KNO3 exhibited increased radicle and plumule length, seedling dry weight, plant height, leaf area, and overall plant dry weight [112]. Tomato seeds also benefited significantly, with improved final emergence percentage, mean emergence time, and physiological attributes, as well as higher levels of total soluble sugars and phenolics [113]. These benefits extended to chickpea seeds, which displayed enhanced germination and seedling vigor following KNO3 seed priming [114]. Moreover, rice seeds treated with KNO3 experienced a 7% increase in yield due to improved germination and growth parameters [115].
In addition to its role in enhancing germination and yield, KNO3 priming has proven effective in improving stress tolerance in crops. Soybean seeds primed with KNO3 showed better germination, emergence traits, and seedling growth under salinity stress [112]. Likewise, cantaloupe seeds demonstrated enhanced germination, growth, and fruit yield under drought stress when primed with KNO3 [116]. Furthermore, carrot seeds experienced improved germination, seedling growth, and root biomass under high-temperature stress following KNO3 seed priming [96]. These findings collectively highlight the versatility and efficacy of KNO3 in seed priming, not only for enhancing germination and crop performance under optimal conditions but also for mitigating the adverse effects of abiotic stresses. The consistent results across diverse crops and environmental conditions make KNO3 a valuable tool for improving agricultural productivity and sustainability.

3.5. Selenium

Se is an essential micronutrient for plant growth [117], playing a pivotal role in various metabolic processes through the synthesis of selenoenzymes. These selenoenzymes act as antioxidants, mitigating oxidative stress by detoxifying reactive oxygen species (ROS) [118]. However, while beneficial in trace amounts, excessive Se can adversely affect plant physiological and biochemical activities [119].
Seed priming with Se has demonstrated notable improvements in germination and stress resilience across various crops. For instance, Se-primed turnip (Brassica rapa L.) seeds showed enhanced germination, photosynthetic content, and seedling biomass by 48%, 56%, and 51%, respectively [120]. In Basmati rice, Se priming increased seedling emergence, chlorophyll content, and antioxidant activity compared to untreated and hydroprimed controls [121]. Under stress conditions, Se priming effectively mitigated oxidative stress in turnip exposed to salinity by upregulating antioxidant genes and reducing ROS, malondialdehyde, and proline levels [120]. Similarly, Se priming improved root length, biomass, and drought tolerance in wheat while increasing sugars and amino acids [122]. Additionally, Se priming boosted germination, growth, and dry weight in rice under flooding stress [123] and improved stress tolerance in quinoa under drought [124]. These findings highlight Se’s dual role in enhancing plant growth and mitigating abiotic stresses, making it a valuable agent for seed priming.

4. SPA Modes of Action

4.1. Overview

One of the most curious characteristics of seed priming is that short-term exposure to SPAs can induce long-term effects in developing plants. For example, broccoli seeds exposed to ascorbic acid for 24 h had significantly improved growth and photosynthesis in 8-week-old seedlings [12,125]. Further, the benefits of seed priming have been observed in the progeny of primed plants [16,126]. Seed priming must therefore induce changes to DNA and protein expression [127,128].
SPAs cause multiple changes at the DNA level. First, seed priming triggers DNA replication, causing an increase in total genomic DNA [129,130]. Second, seed priming activates genes associated with DNA repair [131]. For example, hydropriming activated GTF II H2, MMZ3/UEV 1C, RAD3, Rec A-like 1, RAD54, U DNA glycosylase, and KU 80, which are all associated with DNA repair and subsequent seed germination [131]. Third, seed priming activates genes associated with a variety of other physiological characteristics, such as enzyme synthesis [33,132], ATP [133,134], phytohormones [134,135], and antioxidants [125,135,136] (Table 2).
Improvement in antioxidant defense systems is one of the more widely reported physiological changes. SPAs activate antioxidant systems by increasing the activities of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalase while enhancing the accumulation of glutathione and free proline to mitigate oxidative damage [85,122,143]. These agents optimize photosynthetic processes by protecting chlorophyll and photosynthetic machinery, which causes increasing carotenoids and chlorophyll content, which help maintain energy balance and reduce ROS generation [144]. Equally importantly, oxidative protection also helps protect the mitochondria [133,145], ensuring cellular respiration can continue to generate ATP. Stress hormone modulation, particularly ABA signaling, stimulates carotenoid biosynthesis and stomatal closure, thereby improving water-use efficiency [135]. Additionally, seed priming improves resource allocation by optimizing root-to-shoot ratios, nutrient mobilization, and carbon fixation, leading to enhanced biomass accumulation [83,138,139,140,141]. Such changes enrich phytochemical profiles by increasing phenolics, flavonoids, and other bioactive compounds that contribute to stress resilience and nutritional quality [137,138,146]. By bolstering antioxidant defenses, enhancing photosynthetic efficiency, and improving nutrient utilization, SPAs prepare plants to withstand abiotic stresses and improve overall productivity, as shown in Figure 3.

4.2. Transcriptomic and Translatomic Changes

Changes during transcription are one of the earliest effects of seed priming [147]. CaCl2 priming in barley seeds induced drought tolerance [148]. Transcriptome analysis of those primed barley seeds identified ERF/AP2, C2C2-Dof, and bHLH transcription factors associated with drought tolerance [148]. Similarly, a study in seed primed rice identified 27 upregulated transcription factors and 5 downregulated transcription factors [149]. These transcription factors were associated with the regulation of root growth, phytohormone synthesis, and other established physiological benefits of seed priming. Similarly, Se- and SA-primed seeds analyzed 2371 and 2405 transcripts, respectively, identifying several associated with the regulation of secondary metabolism, plant development, and cell transport [150].
Examination of a plant translatome has also been used to further understand the complex changes associated with seed priming. The translatome helps identify the various regulatory events that modulate protein synthesis [151]. For example, internal ribosome entry site trans-acting factors play a key role in seed germination [152]. One such factor, EBP1, was found to over-accumulate in hydroprimed sugarbeet seeds [153]. EBP1 is broadly described to drive plant growth, specifically through root growth. Silencing EBP1 reduces root growth, while overexpressing EBP1 promotes root growth [154]. However, de novo protein synthesis increased the synthesis of ROS scavenging enzymes, providing a link to priming-induced stress tolerance [155].

4.3. Proteomic Changes

Seed priming induces many changes in protein accumulation. Proteomic analyses of melatonin-primed oat seeds and ascorbate primed wheat seeds uncovered 201 and 83 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs), respectively [156,157]. Halopriming of wheat uncovered 21 DEPs, 17 of which were upregulated [158]. The number and specific DEPs induced through priming seem to vary based on priming agent and plant species, but they often share similar functions. Some are related specifically to cell division [159], but other common functions include RNA repair, antioxidant protection, carbohydrate metabolism, photosynthesis, and electron transfer [156,157]. One of the most commons responses is an increase in ROS scavenging enzymes, such as catalase, superoxide dismutase, or ascorbate peroxidase [84,145,160].

4.4. Metabolomic Changes

Metabolites are often subdivided into primary and secondary classes. Primary metabolites include compounds like amino acids, sugars, nucleotides, and organic acids; secondary metabolites include compounds like phenolics, flavonoids, and others [161]. Changes in both primary and secondary metabolites are often reported in the literature.
Sugars and amino acids are often the most commonly reported changes in primary metabolites due to seed priming. Multiple methods of seed priming have increased α-amylase activity and, consequently, total soluble sugars [162,163]. Increased soluble sugars could contribute to noted improvements in respiration, which is essential for improved growth [133]. The accumulation of amino acids also offers protection for plants. Se-seed-primed wheat had increased alanine, leucine, glycine, cerine, valine, cysteine, and arginine [164], while AsA-seed-primed corn had increased serine, tyrosine, alanine, valine, glutamate, arginine, proline, aspartate, lysine, and isoleucine [165].
Phenolics and flavonoids are the most reported secondary metabolites associated with seed priming. Various crops have shown higher phenolics and flavonoids due to multiple seed priming agents, as reviewed by Jatana et al. [161]. Conversely, broccoli primed with AsA had higher flavonoids and carotenoids with no impact on total phenolics [125]. In all cases, these secondary metabolites are typically of interest due to their antioxidant activity [166] and the role that they could play under stress.

4.5. Epigenetics and Plant Memory

The epigenetic effect of SPAs has often been associated with “stress-induced memory”, where exposure to stress preconditions a plant to respond to future stress more efficiently [34]. In essence, a plant “remembers” its encounter with stress, and this memory could be passed to future generations. The concept of plant memory is not new and has been observed in many species [167,168,169]. However, the idea that this memory may be implanted by SPAs has yet to be fully explored. It has been proposed that SPAs may impose a minor or non-lethal stress within the seed that creates the epigenetic effect [34], and chromatin-dependent regulation is considered a key mechanism [170]. Epigenetic changes in chromatin structure are made possible through processes such as DNA methylation and histone modifications [171,172], which have been shown to occur in some studies. For instance, soybean seeds primed with epethon had an altered chromatin architecture, decreased DNA methyl transferase activity, and decreased DNA methylation [171]. A second study with epethon in soybean identified increased expression of histone acetyltransferase and decreased histone deacetylase [173]. Seed priming effects of DNA methylation and histone modification are limited and represent an area that should be explored further to better understand SPA epigenetic modes of action.

5. Nanoparticle Priming Agents

Nanotechnology in agriculture, particularly in the form of seed nano-priming, has emerged as a transformative approach to addressing critical challenges in global agriculture. With environmental stressors such as climate change, soil contamination, and water scarcity threatening food security, innovative methods are required to ensure sustainable agricultural productivity. Seed nano-priming involves the application of nanoparticles (NPs) under 100 nm to seeds during early growth stages, enhancing germination, seedling vigor, and plant health [137,174]. This technique has garnered significant attention for its potential to mitigate abiotic and biotic stressors and improve crop yields.
ZnO NPs have demonstrated efficacy through seed nano-priming, offering benefits such as enhanced germination rates, increased seedling and plant growth, and improved indicators of plant health when applied during early sowing stages. This approach leverages mechanisms like enhanced nutrient uptake, strengthened antioxidant properties, reduced ROS accumulation, and decreased lipid peroxidation [175]. These benefits are particularly crucial for staple crops, which are essential for addressing the demands of a growing global population and mitigating the decline in crop production caused by climate change and soil contamination [175]. Notably, studies have demonstrated the efficacy of ZnO NPs and Ag NPs in enhancing germination and plant growth in crops like bitter gourd and watermelon [137,176]. ZnO NPs, for instance, improve nutrient uptake, strengthen antioxidant responses, and reduce oxidative damage, while Ag NPs derived from agro-industrial byproducts have been shown to increase germination rates and field yields without compromising fruit quality [137,176].
The variability in the effectiveness of NPs due to differences in preparation methods and structural properties remains a subject of debate. Moreover, concerns regarding the potential toxicity of high NP concentrations in crops like lettuce, wheat, and tomatoes underscore the need for careful optimization and application [177]. There are also emerging innovations such as the integration of endophytes and advanced seed coating technologies that help to maximize the benefits of nano-priming. This study concludes that while nano-priming, with its low-cost potential, offers immense potential for sustainable agriculture, further research is needed to refine nanoparticle engineering and address associated risks, ensuring its practical application in mitigating food security challenges globally.

6. Conclusions and Future Directions

Seed priming is undoubtedly a good strategy for the improvement of crop production. It is well established that SPAs induce a variety of beneficial changes in plants, such as improved germination, photosynthesis, respiration, antioxidant defense systems, stress tolerance, and growth. SPAs also represent a generally low-cost technology to enhance crop germination, growth, and stress tolerance. For instance, salicylic acid was the most studied SPA in the past 3 years and was effective in 100% of those studies. The current cost of salicylic from Sigma-Aldrich is CAD 170 for 500 g of salicylic acid. As an example, Alam et al. [87] found 0.75 mM was the most effective concentration for seed priming cucumbers. This means a person could make 1 L of seed priming solution for CAD 0.06, with 1 L being sufficient to prime hundreds of seeds. The exact cost varies based on the specific SPA, but there are several inexpensive SPAs demonstrating high efficacy (e.g., ascorbic acid, chitosan, KNO3, CaCl2, and others). However, the majority (63%) of seed priming research is being conducted in only three countries: India, China, and Pakistan [34]. There is a need to better extend this knowledge on a global scale.
One challenge moving forward is the need for a comprehensive, open-access database of SPAs. Not every SPA is effective in every plant, and they do not all induce the same type or degree of benefits. For example, ascorbic acid was effective at significantly promoting germination and growth in broccoli seedlings [12,125], but was ineffective in 29% of sampled studies in the past 3 years. There are also distinct differences in effective concentrations. A catalog of SPAs, concentrations, effects, and affected crops would be beneficial.
This review discussed some molecular and physiological changes associated with seed priming, including possible epigenetic changes. Though there were some molecular data to support these changes, the data were not abundant. There is a need to further develop the SPA mode of action. Omics approaches are needed to better identify molecular changes from SPAs with emphasis on exploring other epigenetic changing mechanisms beyond DNA methylation and histone modification. Such studies would not only add to the knowledge of how SPAs work but could also provide insight into the long-term stability of epigenetic changes and association with plant stress memory.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cimb47030177/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.M. and V.R.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.M. and V.R.M.; writing—review and editing, M.T.M. and V.R.M.; visualization, M.T.M. and V.R.M.; supervision, M.T.M.; project administration, M.T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were produced in this research.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Department of Plant, Food, and Environmental Sciences for administrative support in preparing this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Shukla, P.R.; Skeg, J.; Calvo Buendia, E.; Masson-Delmotte, V.; Pörtner, H.-O.; Roberts, D.C.; Zhai, P.; Slade, R.; Connors, S.; van Diemen, S.; et al. Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Spinoni, J.; Barbosa, P.; De Jager, A.; McCormick, N.; Naumann, G.; Vogt, J.V.; Magni, D.; Masante, D.; Mazzeschi, M. A new global database of meteorological drought events from 1951 to 2016. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 2019, 22, 100593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ye, J.-S.; Gong, Y.-H.; Zhang, F.; Ren, J.; Bai, X.-K.; Zheng, Y. Which Temperature and Precipitation Extremes Best Explain the Variation of Warm versus Cold Years and Wet versus Dry Years? J. Clim. 2018, 31, 45–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lehmann, J.; Coumou, D.; Frieler, K. Increased record-breaking precipitation events under global warming. Clim. Change 2015, 132, 501–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Van Oort, P.A.J.; Zwart, S.J. Impacts of climate change on rice production in Africa and causes of simulated yield changes. Glob. Change Biol. 2018, 24, 1029–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Davenport, F.; Funk, C.; Galu, G. How will East African maize yields respond to climate change and can agricultural development mitigate this response? Clim. Change 2018, 147, 491–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Trnka, M.; Feng, S.; Semenov, M.A.; Olesen, J.E.; Kersebaum, K.C.; Rötter, R.P.; Semerádová, D.; Klem, K.; Huang, W.; Ruiz-Ramos, M.; et al. Mitigation efforts will not fully alleviate the increase in water scarcity occurrence probability in wheat-producing areas. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaau2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, B.; Asseng, S.; Müller, C.; Ewert, F.; Elliott, J.; Lobell, D.B.; Martre, P.; Ruane, A.C.; Wallach, D.; Jones, J.W.; et al. Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods. Nat. Clim. Change 2016, 6, 1130–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Asseng, S.; Ewert, F.; Martre, P.; Rötter, R.P.; Lobell, D.B.; Cammarano, D.; Kimball, B.A.; Ottman, M.J.; Wall, G.W.; White, J.W.; et al. Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production. Nat. Clim. Change 2015, 5, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mariem, S.B.; Soba, D.; Zhou, B.; Loladze, I.; Morales, F.; Aranjuelo, I. Climate Change, Crop Yields, and Grain Quality of C3 Cereals: A Meta-Analysis of [CO2], Temperature, and Drought Effects. Plants 2021, 10, 1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gebeyaw, M. Role of Seed Priming on Seed Quality: A Review. Int. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 2020, 7, 779–784. [Google Scholar]
  12. MacDonald, M.T.; Kannan, R.; Jayaseelan, R. Ascorbic Acid Preconditioning Effect on Broccoli Seedling Growth and Photosynthesis under Drought Stress. Plants 2022, 11, 1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zulfiqar, F. Effect of seed priming on horticultural crops. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 286, 110197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marthandan, V.; Geetha, R.; Kumutha, K.; Renganathan, V.G.; Karthikeyan, A.; Ramalingam, J. Seed Priming: A Feasible Strategy to Enhance Drought Tolerance in Crop Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lada, R.R.; Stiles, A.; Blake, T.J. The effects of natural and synthetic seed preconditioning agents (SPAs) in hastening seedling emergence and enhancing yield and quality of processing carrots. Sci. Hortic. 2005, 106, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. MacDonald, M.T.; Lada, R.R.; Robinson, A.R.; Hoyle, J. The Benefits of Ambiol® in Promoting Germination, Growth, and Drought Tolerance can be Passed on to Next-Generation Tomato Seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2010, 29, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Simma, B.; Polthanee, A.; Goggi, A.S.; Siri, B.; Promkhambut, A.; Caragea, P.C. Wood vinegar seed priming improves yield and suppresses weeds in dryland direct-seeding rice under rainfed production. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2017, 37, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. MacDonald, M.T.; Lada, R.R.; Robinson, A.R.; Hoyle, J. Seed Preconditioning with Natural and Synthetic Antioxidants Induces Drought Tolerance in Tomato Seedlings. HortScience 2009, 44, 1323–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rhaman, M.S.; Rauf, F.; Tania, S.S.; Khatun, M. Seed Priming Methods: Application in Field Crops and Future Perspectives. Asian J. Res. Crop Sci. 2020, 5, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M.R. Pre-Sowing Seed Treatment—A Shotgun Approach to Improve Germination, Plant Growth, and Crop Yield Under Saline and Non-Saline Conditions. In Advances in Agronomy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; Volume 88, pp. 223–271. ISBN 978-0-12-000786-8. [Google Scholar]
  21. Paul, S.; Dey, S.; Kundu, R. Seed priming: An emerging tool towards sustainable agriculture. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 97, 215–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, L.; Huo, W.; Yao, D.; Li, M. Effects of solid matrix priming (SMP) and salt stress on broccoli and cauliflower seed germination and early seedling growth. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 255, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Feghhenabi, F.; Hadi, H.; Khodaverdiloo, H.; van Genuchten, M.T. Seed priming alleviated salinity stress during germination and emergence of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 231, 106022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Anwar, M.P.; Jahan, R.; Rahman, M.R.; Islam, A.K.M.M.; Uddin, F.M.J. Seed priming for increased seed germination and enhanced seedling vigor of winter rice. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 756, 012047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Adhikari, B.; Adhikari, M.; Ghimire, B.; Adhikari, B.C.; Park, G.; Choi, E.H. Cold plasma seed priming modulates growth, redox homeostasis and stress response by inducing reactive species in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2020, 156, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abdel-Aziz, H.M.M.; Hasaneen, M.N.A.; Omer, A.M. Impact of engineered nanomaterials either alone or loaded with NPK on growth and productivity of French bean plants: Seed priming vs foliar application. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019, 125, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Majda, C.; Khalid, D.; Aziz, A.; Rachid, B.; Badr, A.-S.; Lotfi, A.; Mohamed, B. Nutri-priming as an efficient means to improve the agronomic performance of molybdenum in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 661, 654–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bezhin, K.; Santel, H.-J.; Gerhards, R. The Effect of Sugar Beet Seed Priming on Sugar Beet Yield and Weed Suppressive Ability. J. Plant Sci. 2018, 6, 146–156. [Google Scholar]
  29. Farooq, M.; Usman, M.; Nadeem, F.; Rehman, H.; Wahid, A.; Basra, S.; Siddique, K. Seed priming in field crops: Potential benefits, adoption and challenges. Crop Pasture Sci. 2019, 70, 731–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Johnson, R.; Puthur, J.T. Seed priming as a cost effective technique for developing plants with cross tolerance to salinity stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 162, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bewley, J.D.; Bradford, K.; Hilhorst, H.; Nonogaki, H. Seeds: Physiology of Development, Germination and Dormancy; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; ISBN 978-1-4614-4692-7. [Google Scholar]
  32. Savaedi, Z.; Parmoon, G.; Moosavi, S.A.; Bakhshande, A. The role of light and Gibberellic Acid on cardinal temperatures and thermal time required for germination of Charnushka (Nigella sativa) seed. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 132, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, K.; Arora, R. Priming memory invokes seed stress-tolerance. Cross-Stress Toler. Stress Mem. Plants 2013, 94, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Srivastava, A.K.; Suresh Kumar, J.; Suprasanna, P. Seed ‘primeomics’: Plants memorize their germination under stress. Biol. Rev. 2021, 96, 1723–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Catiempo, R.L.; Photchanachai, S.; Bayogan, E.R.V.; Wongs-Aree, C. Impact of hydropriming on germination and seedling establishment of sunflower seeds at elevated temperature. Plant Soil Environ. 2021, 67, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Caseiro, R.; Bennett, M.; Marcos-Filho, J. Comparison of three priming techniques for onion seed lots differing in initial seed quality. Seed Sci. Technol. 2004, 32, 356–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ghassemi-Golezani, K.; Chadordooz-Jeddi, A.; Nasrullahzadeh, S.; Moghaddam, M. Influence of hydro-priming duration on field performance of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 5, 893–897. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hardegree, S.P. Optimization of Seed Priming Treatments to Increase Low-Temperature Germination Rate. J. Range Manag. 1996, 49, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Min, T.-G.; Seo, B.-M. Optimum conditions for tobacco seed priming by PEG 6000. Korean J. Crop Sci. 1999, 44, 263–266. [Google Scholar]
  40. Callan, N.W.; Mathre, D.; Miller, J.B. Biopriming seed treatment for biological control of Pythium ultimum preemergence damping-off in sh-2 sweet corn. Plant Dis. 1990, 74, 368–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Taylor, A.G.; Harman, G.E.; Nielsen, P.A. Biological Seed Treatments using Trichoderma harzianum for Horticultural Crops. HortTechnology 1994, 4, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Migahid, M.M.; Elghobashy, R.M.; Bidak, L.M.; Amin, A.W. Priming of Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn seeds with H2O2 and magnetic field ameliorates seawater stress. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Afzal, I.; Saleem, S.; Skalicky, M.; Javed, T.; Bakhtavar, M.A.; Ul Haq, Z.; Kamran, M.; Shahid, M.; Sohail Saddiq, M.; Afzal, A.; et al. Magnetic Field Treatments Improves Sunflower Yield by Inducing Physiological and Biochemical Modulations in Seeds. Molecules 2021, 26, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Devika, O.S.; Singh, S.; Sarkar, D.; Barnwal, P.; Suman, J.; Rakshit, A. Seed Priming: A Potential Supplement in Integrated Resource Management Under Fragile Intensive Ecosystems. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 654001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Farooq, M.; Basra, S.M.; Wahid, A.; Ahmad, N. Changes in Nutrient-Homeostasis and Reserves Metabolism During Rice Seed Priming: Consequences for Seedling Emergence and Growth. Agric. Sci. China 2010, 9, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chatterjee, N.; Sarkar, D.; Sankar, A.; Pal, S.; Singh, H.B.; Singh, R.K.; Bohra, J.S.; Rakshit, A. On-farm seed priming interventions in agronomic crops. Acta Agric. Slov. 2018, 111, 715–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Darwin, C. Effect of salt-water on the germination of seeds. Gard. Chron. Agric. Gaz. 1855, 47, 773. [Google Scholar]
  48. Darwin, C. Does sea water kill seeds? Gard. Chron. Agric. Gaz. 1855, 242, 356–357. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ells, J.E. The influence of treating tomato seed with nutrient solutions on emergence rate and seedling growth. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1963, 83, 684–687. [Google Scholar]
  50. Singh, A.; Dahiru, R.; Musa, M.; Sani Haliru, B. Effect of Osmopriming Duration on Germination, Emergence, and Early Growth of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in the Sudan Savanna of Nigeria. Int. J. Agron. 2014, 2014, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Afifa, R.I.; Islam, N.; Choudhury, S. Effects of Priming on Onion Seed Germination and Field Performance during Summer Sowing. J. Sci. Res. Rep. 2024, 30, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Moradi, A.; Younesi, O. Effects of Osmo- and Hydro-priming on Seed Parameters of Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2009, 3, 1696–1700. [Google Scholar]
  53. Moradi, L.; Siosemardeh, A. Combination of seed priming and nutrient foliar application improved physiological attributes, grain yield, and biofortification of rainfed wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1287677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Paul, A.; Mondal, S.; Chakraborty, K.; Biswas, A.K. Moving forward to understand the alteration of physiological mechanism by seed priming with different halo-agents under salt stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 2024, 114, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Rhaman, M.S.; Imran, S.; Rauf, F.; Khatun, M.; Baskin, C.C.; Murata, Y.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Seed Priming with Phytohormones: An Effective Approach for the Mitigation of Abiotic Stress. Plants 2020, 10, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sytar, O.; Kumari, P.; Yadav, S.; Brestic, M.; Rastogi, A. Phytohormone Priming: Regulator for Heavy Metal Stress in Plants. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 739–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Salvi, P.; Manna, M.; Kaur, H.; Thakur, T.; Gandass, N.; Bhatt, D.; Muthamilarasan, M. Phytohormone signaling and crosstalk in regulating drought stress response in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 1305–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhao, B.; Liu, Q.; Wang, B.; Yuan, F. Roles of Phytohormones and Their Signaling Pathways in Leaf Development and Stress Responses. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 3566–3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kende, H.; Zeevaart, J.A.D. The Five “Classical” Plant Hormones. Plant Cell 1997, 7, 1197–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Waadt, R.; Seller, C.A.; Hsu, P.-K.; Takahashi, Y.; Munemasa, S.; Schroeder, J.I. Plant hormone regulation of abiotic stress responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 680–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Khan, M.I.R.; Kumari, S.; Nazir, F.; Khanna, R.R.; Gupta, R.; Chhillar, H. Defensive Role of Plant Hormones in Advancing Abiotic Stress-Resistant Rice Plants. Rice Sci. 2023, 30, 15–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Khan, N.; Bano, A.; Ali, S.; Babar, A. Crosstalk amongst phytohormones from planta and PGPR under biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 90, 189–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Arnao, M.; Hernández-Ruiz, J. Is Phytomelatonin a New Plant Hormone? Agronomy 2020, 10, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nunes Da Silva, M.; Carvalho, S.M.P.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; António, C.; Vasconcelos, M.W. Defence-related pathways, phytohormones and primary metabolism are key players in kiwifruit plant tolerance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae. Plant Cell Environ. 2022, 45, 528–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Rakshit, A.; Singh, H.B. (Eds.) Advances in Seed Priming; Springer: Singapore, 2018; ISBN 9789811300318. [Google Scholar]
  66. Zulfiqar, F.; Ashraf, M. Bioregulators: Unlocking their potential role in regulation of the plant oxidative defense system. Plant Mol. Biol. 2021, 105, 11–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Smirnoff, N.; Wheeler, G.L. Ascorbic Acid in Plants: Biosynthesis and Function. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2000, 19, 267–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Farooq, M.; Wahid, A.; Siddique, K.H.M. Micronutrient application through seed treatments: A review. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2012, 12, 125–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Thakur, M.; Tiwari, S.; Kataria, S.; Anand, A. Recent advances in seed priming strategies for enhancing planting value of vegetable seeds. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 305, 111355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Iqbal, S.; Farooq, M.; Cheema, S.A. Boron seed priming improves the seedling emergence, growth, grain yield and grain biofortification of bread wheat. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2017, 19, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sadeghizadeh, M.; Zarea, M.J. Effects of seed priming with zinc on germination, nursery seedling growth and paddy fields yield of two rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2022, 25, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sharma, P.; Gautam, A.; Kumar, V.; Guleria, P. MgO nanoparticles mediated seed priming inhibits the growth of lentil (Lens culinaris). Vegetos 2022, 35, 1128–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ling, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Cheng, B.; Tan, M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z. Seed Priming with Chitosan Improves Germination Characteristics Associated with Alterations in Antioxidant Defense and Dehydration-Responsive Pathway in White Clover under Water Stress. Plants 2022, 11, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hidangmayum, A.; Dwivedi, P. Effect of chitosan seed priming on mungbean seedlings subjected to different levels of water potential. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2023, 45, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kaushal, K.; Rajani, K.; Kumar, R.R.; Ranjan, T.; Kumar, A.; Ahmad, M.F.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, A. Physio-biochemical responses and crop performance analysis in chickpea upon botanical priming. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 9342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Shumaila; Ullah, S.; Shah, W.; Hafeez, A.; Ali, B.; Khan, S.; Ercisli, S.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Elshikh, M.S. Biochar and Seed Priming Technique with Gallic Acid: An Approach toward Improving Morpho-Anatomical and Physiological Features of Solanum melongena L. under Induced NaCl and Boron Stresses. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 28207–28232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Xia, J.; Hao, X.; Wang, T.; Li, H.; Shi, X.; Liu, Y.; Luo, H. Seed Priming with Gibberellin Regulates the Germination of Cotton Seeds Under Low-Temperature Conditions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 319–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Oğuz, M.Ç.; Oğuz, E.; Güler, M. Seed priming with essential oils for sustainable wheat agriculture in semi-arid region. PeerJ 2023, 11, e15126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ofoe, R.; Gunupuru, L.R.; Wang-Pruski, G.; Fofana, B.; Thomas, R.H.; Abbey, L. Seed priming with pyroligneous acid mitigates aluminum stress, and promotes tomato seed germination and seedling growth. Plant Stress 2022, 4, 100083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Silva, P.C.C.; Azevedo Neto, A.D.; Gheyi, H.R.; Ribas, R.F.; Silva, C.R.R.; Cova, A.M.W. Seed priming with H2O2 improves photosynthetic efficiency and biomass production in sunflower plants under salt stress. Arid Land Res. Manag. 2022, 36, 283–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hossinifarahi, M.; Moazen, H.A.; Amiri, A.; Jowkar, M.M.; Mottaghipisheh, J. Evaluation of Seed Priming and Culture Media to Improve the Germination Performance and Quality of Sweet Pepper and Eggplant Seedlings. Int. J. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2022, 9, 415–428. [Google Scholar]
  82. Dawoud, T.M.; Akhtar, N.; Okla, M.K.; Shah, A.N.; Shah, A.A.; Abdel-Mawgoud, M.; AbdElgayed, G.; Al-Hashimi, A.; AbdElgawad, H. Seed Priming with Pomegranate Peel Extract Improves Growth, Glucosinolates Metabolism and Antimicrobial Potential of Brassica oleraceae Varieties. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 3043–3055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. El Sayed, A.I.; Rafudeen, M.S.; Ganie, S.A.; Hossain, M.S.; Gomaa, A.M. Seed priming with cypress leaf extract enhances photosynthesis and antioxidative defense in zucchini seedlings under salt stress. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 293, 110707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ignatenko, A.A.; Talanova, V.V.; Repkina, N.S.; Titov, A.F. Effect of Salicylic Acid on Antioxidant Enzymes and Cold Tolerance of Cucumber Plants. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 68, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Alam, A.U.; Ullah, H.; Himanshu, S.K.; Tisarum, R.; Cha-um, S.; Datta, A. Seed Priming Enhances Germination and Morphological, Physio-Biochemical, and Yield Traits of Cucumber under Water-Deficit Stress. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2023, 23, 3961–3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hussain, S.J.; Khan, N.A.; Anjum, N.A.; Masood, A.; Khan, M.I.R. Mechanistic Elucidation of Salicylic Acid and Sulphur-Induced Defence Systems, Nitrogen Metabolism, Photosynthetic, and Growth Potential of Mungbean (Vigna radiata) Under Salt Stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 1000–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Alam, A.U.; Ullah, H.; Himanshu, S.K.; Praseartkul, P.; Tisarum, R.; Cha-um, S.; Datta, A. Seed Priming and Foliar Application of Salicylic Acid is Equally Beneficial in Mitigating Drought Stress in Cucumber. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2023, 23, 6299–6316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Alam, A.; Ullah, H.; Thuenprom, N.; Tisarum, R.; Cha-um, S.; Datta, A. Seed priming with salicylic acid enhances growth, physiological traits, fruit yield, and quality parameters of cantaloupe under water-deficit stress. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 150, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Anwar, S.; Iqbal, M.; Raza, S.H.; Iqbal, N. Efficacy of Seed Preconditiong with Salicylic and Ascorbic Acid in Increasing Vigor of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Seedling. Pak. J. Bot. 2013, 45, 157–162. [Google Scholar]
  90. Ceritoglu, M.; Erman, M.; Çığ, F.; Ceritoglu, F.; Uçar, Ö.; Soysal, S.; El Sabagh, A. Enhancement of Root System Architecture, Seedling Growth, and Germination in Lentil under Salinity Stress by Seed Priming with Siliconand Salicylic Acid. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2023, 32, 4481–4491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kambe, T.; Tsuji, T.; Hashimoto, A.; Itsumura, N. The Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Roles of Zinc Transporters in Zinc Homeostasis and Metabolism. Physiol. Rev. 2015, 95, 749–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yang, M.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Tian, J.; Liang, L.; Qiu, Y.; Wang, G.; Du, Q.; Cheng, D.; Cai, H.; et al. A high activity zinc transporter OsZIP9 mediates zinc uptake in rice. Plant J. 2020, 103, 1695–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Dang, K.; Mu, J.; Tian, H.; Gao, D.; Zhou, H.; Guo, L.; Shao, X.; Geng, Y.; Zhang, Q. Zinc regulation of chlorophyll fluorescence and carbohydrate metabolism in saline-sodic stressed rice seedlings. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rahman, A.; Islam, R.; Azim, A.; Skalicky, M.; Hossain, A. Chapter 5—Role of Zinc for Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. In Zinc in Plants; Tripathi, D.K., Singh, V.P., Pandey, S., Sharma, S., Chauhan, D.K., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2024; pp. 95–148. ISBN 978-0-323-91314-0. [Google Scholar]
  95. Imran, M.; Mahmood, A.; Neumann, G.; Boelt, B. Zinc Seed Priming Improves Spinach Germination at Low Temperature. Agriculture 2021, 11, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Rehman, A.; Farooq, M.; Ahmad, R.; Basra, S.M.A. Seed priming with zinc improves the germination and early seedling growth of wheat. Seed Sci. Technol. 2015, 43, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Choukri, M.; Abouabdillah, A.; Bouabid, R.; Abd-Elkader, O.H.; Pacioglu, O.; Boufahja, F.; Bourioug, M. Zn application through seed priming improves productivity and grain nutritional quality of silage corn. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 103456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Harris, D.; Rashid, A.; Miraj, G.; Arif, M.; Shah, H. ‘On-farm’ seed priming with zinc sulphate solution—A cost-effective way to increase the maize yields of resource-poor farmers. Field Crop. Res. 2007, 102, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sharma, M.; Parmar, D.K.; Sharma, S.K. On-farm seed priming with zinc nutrition: A cost effective way to increase the yield of resource poor farmers. J. Plant Nutr. 2021, 44, 2371–2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yamaguchi, S. Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 225–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Iqbal, N.; Nazar, R.; Khan, M.; Masood, A. Role of gibberellins in regulation of source-sink relations under optimal and limiting environmental conditions. Curr. Sci. 2011, 100, 998–1007. [Google Scholar]
  102. Castro-Camba, R.; Sánchez, C.; Vidal, N.; Vielba, J.M. Plant Development and Crop Yield: The Role of Gibberellins. Plants 2022, 11, 2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ma, H.-Y.; Zhao, D.-D.; Ning, Q.-R.; Wei, J.-P.; Li, Y.; Wang, M.-M.; Liu, X.-L.; Jiang, C.-J.; Liang, Z.-W. A Multi-year Beneficial Effect of Seed Priming with Gibberellic Acid-3 (GA3) on Plant Growth and Production in a Perennial Grass, Leymus chinensis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gnawali, A.; Subedi, R. Gibberellic acid priming enhances maize seed germination under low water potential. Indones. J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 22, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Jyoti, B.; Gaurav, S.S.; Pant, U. Use of growth regulators as priming agent for improvement of seed vigour in tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2016, 8, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Khan, M.N.; Khan, Z.; Luo, T.; Liu, J.; Rizwan, M.; Zhang, J.; Xu, Z.; Wu, H.; Hu, L. Seed priming with gibberellic acid and melatonin in rapeseed: Consequences for improving yield and seed quality under drought and non-stress conditions. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 156, 112850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Tsegay, B.A.; Andargie, M. Seed Priming with Gibberellic Acid (GA3) Alleviates Salinity Induced Inhibition of Germination and Seedling Growth of Zea mays L., Pisum sativum Var. abyssinicum A. Braun and Lathyrus sativus L. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 21, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Younesi, O.; Moradi, A. Effect Of Priming Of Seeds Of Medicago Sativa ‘Bami’ With Gibberellic Acid On Germination, Seedlings Growth And Antioxidant Enzymes Activity Under Salinity Stress. J. Hortic. Res. 2015, 22, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Chunthaburee, S.; Sanitchon, J.; Pattanagul, W.; Theerakulpisut, P. Alleviation of Salt Stress in Seedlings of Black Glutinous Rice by Seed Priming with Spermidine and Gibberellic Acid. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2014, 42, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Thongtip, A.; Mosaleeyanon, K.; Korinsak, S.; Toojinda, T.; Darwell, C.T.; Chutimanukul, P.; Chutimanukul, P. Promotion of seed germination and early plant growth by KNO3 and light spectra in Ocimum tenuiflorum using a plant factory. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ruttanaruangboworn, A.; Chanprasert, W.; Tobunluepop, P.; Onwimol, D. Effect of seed priming with different concentrations of potassium nitrate on the pattern of seed imbibition and germination of rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Integr. Agric. 2017, 16, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ahmadvand, G.; Soleimani, F.; Pouya, M. Effect of Seed Priming with Potassium Nitrate on Germination and Emergence Traits of Two Soybean Cultivars under Salinity Stress Conditions. IDOSI Publ. 2012, 12, 769–774. [Google Scholar]
  113. Moaaz Ali, M.; Javed, T.; Mauro, R.P.; Shabbir, R.; Afzal, I.; Yousef, A.F. Effect of Seed Priming with Potassium Nitrate on the Performance of Tomato. Agriculture 2020, 10, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Choudhury, A.; Bordolui, S.K. Inducement of Seed Priming with Potassium Nitrate on quality Performance of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Biol. Forum—Int. J. 2022, 14, 4. [Google Scholar]
  115. Dhillon, B.S.; Kumar, V.; Sagwal, P.; Kaur, N.; Singh Mangat, G.; Singh, S. Seed Priming with Potassium Nitrate and Gibberellic Acid Enhances the Performance of Dry Direct Seeded Rice (Oryza sativa L.) in North-Western India. Agronomy 2021, 11, 849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Alam, A.; Ullah, H.; Cha-um, S.; Tisarum, R.; Datta, A. Effect of seed priming with potassium nitrate on growth, fruit yield, quality and water productivity of cantaloupe under water-deficit stress. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 288, 110354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kaur, H.; Kaur, H.; Kaur, H.; Srivastava, S. The beneficial roles of trace and ultratrace elements in plants. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 100, 219–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Abou El-hamd, N.; Ahmed, E.Z. Red Kidney Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Germination and Seedling Growth as affected by Selenium, Nano- Selenium and Sulfur. J. Plant Physiol. Pathol. 2021, 9, 261. [Google Scholar]
  119. Shafiq, S.; Adeel, M.; Raza, H.; Iqbal, R. Effects of foliar application of selenium in maize (Zea mays L.) under cadmium toxicity. Biol. Forum–Int. J. 2019, 11, 2. [Google Scholar]
  120. Hussain, S.; Ahmed, S.; Akram, W.; Li, G.; Yasin, N.A. Selenium seed priming enhanced the growth of salt-stressed Brassica rapa L. through improving plant nutrition and the antioxidant system. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 13, 1050359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Khaliq, A.; Aslam, F.; Matloob, A.; Hussain, S.; Geng, M.; Wahid, A.; ur Rehman, H. Seed Priming with Selenium: Consequences for Emergence, Seedling Growth, and Biochemical Attributes of Rice. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2015, 166, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Nawaz, F.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Ahmad, R.; Waraich, E.A. Selenium (Se) Seed Priming Induced Growth and Biochemical Changes in Wheat Under Water Deficit Conditions. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2013, 151, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Hu, F.; Jiang, S.; Wang, Z.; Hu, K.; Xie, Y.; Zhou, L.; Zhu, J.; Xing, D.; Du, B. Seed priming with selenium: Effects on germination, seedling growth, biochemical attributes, and grain yield in rice growing under flooding conditions. Plant Direct 2022, 6, e378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Gholami, S.; Dehaghi, M.A.; Rezazadeh, A.; Naji, A.M. Seed germination and physiological responses of quinoa to selenium priming under drought stress. Bragantia 2022, 81, e0722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Cai, L.; Abbey, L.; MacDonald, M. Changes in Endogenous Carotenoids, Flavonoids, and Phenolics of Drought-Stressed Broccoli Seedlings After Ascorbic Acid Preconditioning. Plants 2024, 13, 3513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Baltazar, M.; Reis, S.; Carvalho, A.; Lima-Brito, J. Cytological and yield-related analyses in offspring of primed bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seeds. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2021, 68, 359–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Louis, N.; Dhankher, O.P.; Puthur, J.T. Seed priming can enhance and retain stress tolerance in ensuing generations by inducing epigenetic changes and trans-generational memory. Physiol. Plant. 2023, 175, e13881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Corbineau, F.; Taskiran-Özbingöl, N.; El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H. Improvement of Seed Quality by Priming: Concept and Biological Basis. Seeds 2023, 2, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ozbingol, N.; Corbineau, F.; Groot, S.P.C.; Bino, R.J.; Come, D. Activation of the Cell Cycle in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Seeds during Osmoconditioning as Related to Temperature and Oxygen. Ann. Bot. 1999, 84, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. de Castro, R.D.; van Lammeren, A.A.M.; Groot, S.P.C.; Bino, R.J.; Hilhorst, H.W.M. Cell Division and Subsequent Radicle Protrusion in Tomato Seeds Are Inhibited by Osmotic Stress But DNA Synthesis and Formation of Microtubular Cytoskeleton Are Not1. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Sharma, S.N.; Maheshwari, A. Expression patterns of DNA repair genes associated with priming small and large chickpea (Cicer arietinum) seeds. Seed Sci. Tech. 2015, 43, 250–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Valivand, M.; Amooaghaie, R.; Ahadi, A. Seed priming with H2S and Ca2+ trigger signal memory that induces cross-adaptation against nickel stress in zucchini seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 143, 286–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Sun, H.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; Wu, S.; Wang, X. Ascorbate–glutathione cycle of mitochondria in osmoprimed soybean cotyledons in response to imbibitional chilling injury. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Chojnowski, M.; Corbineau, F.; Côme, D. Physiological and biochemical changes induced in sunflower seeds by osmopriming and subsequent drying, storage and aging. Seed Sci. Res. 1997, 7, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Corbineau, F. Markers of seed quality: From present to future. Seed Sci. Res. 2012, 22, S61–S68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Sen, A.; Puthur, J.T. Influence of different seed priming techniques on oxidative and antioxidative responses during the germination of Oryza sativa varieties. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2020, 26, 551–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Waqas Mazhar, M.; Ishtiaq, M.; Maqbool, M.; Mahmoud, E.A.; Ullah, F.; Elansary, H.O. Optimizing bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) performance: Exploring the impact of varied seed priming durations and zinc oxide nanoparticle concentrations on germination, growth, phytochemical attributes, and agronomic outcomes. Cogent Food Agric. 2024, 10, 2313052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ali, Q.; Daud, M.K.; Haider, M.Z.; Ali, S.; Rizwan, M.; Aslam, N.; Noman, A.; Iqbal, N.; Shahzad, F.; Deeba, F.; et al. Seed priming by sodium nitroprusside improves salt tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by enhancing physiological and biochemical parameters. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 119, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Fathi, N.; Kazemeini, S.A.; Alinia, M.; Mastinu, A. The effect of seed priming with melatonin on improving the tolerance of Zea mays L. var saccharata to paraquat-induced oxidative stress through photosynthetic systems and enzymatic antioxidant activities. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2023, 124, 101967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Kurt-Celebi, A.; Colak, N.; Torun, H.; Dosedělová, V.; Tarkowski, P.; Ayaz, F.A. Exogenous melatonin ameliorates ionizing radiation-induced damage by modulating growth, osmotic adjustment and photosynthetic capacity in wheat seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 187, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Anwar, A.; Yu, X.; Li, Y. Seed priming as a promising technique to improve growth, chlorophyll, photosynthesis and nutrient contents in cucumber seedlings. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2020, 48, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zhu, Z.H.; Sami, A.; Xu, Q.Q.; Wu, L.L.; Zheng, W.Y.; Chen, Z.P.; Jin, X.Z.; Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Yu, Y.; et al. Effects of seed priming treatments on the germination and development of two rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) varieties under the co-influence of low temperature and drought. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0257236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ashraf, M.A.; Rasheed, R.; Hussain, I.; Hafeez, A.; Adrees, M.; ur Rehman, M.Z.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, S. Effect of different seed priming agents on chromium accumulation, oxidative defense, glyoxalase system and mineral nutrition in canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 309, 119769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Sun, T.; Rao, S.; Zhou, X.; Li, L. Plant carotenoids: Recent advances and future perspectives. Mol. Hortic. 2022, 2, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Jisha, K.C.; Puthur, J.T. Seed priming with BABA (β-amino butyric acid): A cost-effective method of abiotic stress tolerance in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek. Protoplasma 2016, 253, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Moulick, D.; Santra, S.C.; Ghosh, D. Rice seed priming with Se: A novel approach to mitigate As induced adverse consequences on growth, yield and As load in brown rice. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 355, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Zogli, P.; Pingault, L.; Grover, S.; Louis, J. Ento(o)mics: The intersection of ‘omic’ approaches to decipher plant defense against sap-sucking insect pests. Biot. Interact. AGRI 2019 2020, 56, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Sazegari, S.; Zinati, Z.; Tahmasebi, A. Dynamic transcriptomic analysis uncovers key genes and mechanisms involved in seed priming-induced tolerance to drought in barley. Gene Rep. 2020, 21, 100941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, A.; Jing, J.; Li, Z.; Ahmed, A.; Shi, Y.; Yang, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhang, W. Transcriptomic Analyses Reveal Carbon Dots-Based Seed priming in the Regulation of Root Growth in Rice. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 7614–7623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Hussain, S.; Yin, H.; Peng, S.; Khan, F.A.; Khan, F.; Sameeullah, M.; Hussain, H.A.; Huang, J.; Cui, K.; Nie, L. Comparative Transcriptional Profiling of Primed and Non-primed Rice Seedlings under Submergence Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Pagano, A.; Zannino, L.; Pagano, P.; Doria, E.; Dondi, D.; Macovei, A.; Biggiogera, M.; Araújo, S.d.S.; Balestrazzi, A. Changes in genotoxic stress response, ribogenesis and PAP (3’-phosphoadenosine 5’-phosphate) levels are associated with loss of desiccation tolerance in overprimed Medicago truncatula seeds. Plant Cell Environ. 2022, 45, 1457–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Sano, N.; Rajjou, L.; North, H.M. Lost in Translation: Physiological Roles of Stored mRNAs in Seed Germination. Plants 2020, 9, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Catusse, J.; Meinhard, J.; Job, C.; Strub, J.; Fischer, U.; Pestsova, E.; Westhoff, P.; Dorsselaer, A.; Job, D. Proteomics reveals potential biomarkers of seed vigor in sugarbeet. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1569–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Lokdarshi, A.; Papdi, C.; Pettkó-Szandtner, A.; Dorokhov, S.; Scheres, B.; Magyar, Z.; Von Arnim, A.G.; Bögre, L.; Horváth, B.M. ErbB-3 Binding Protein 1 Regulates Translation and Counteracts Reinoblastoma Related to Maintain the Root Meristem. Plant Physiol. 2020, 182, 919–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Galland, M.; Huguet, R.; Arc, E.; Cueff, G.; Job, D.; Rajjou, L. Dynamic Proteomics Emphasizes the Importance of Selective mRNA Translation and Protein Turnover during Arabidopsis Seed Germination. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2014, 13, 252–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Yan, H.; Mao, P. Comparative Time-Course Physiological Responses and Proteomic Analysis of Melatonin Priming on Promoting Germination in Aged Oat (Avena sativa L.) Seeds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Fercha, A.; Capriotti, A.L.; Caruso, G.; Cavaliere, C.; Samperi, R.; Stampachiacchiere, S.; Laganà, A. Comparative analysis of metabolic proteome variation in ascorbate-primed and unprimed wheat seeds during germination under salt stress. J. Proteom. 2014, 108, 238–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Liu, L.; Li, H.; Li, N.; Li, S.; Guo, J.; Li, X. Parental salt priming improves the low temperature tolerance in wheat offspring via modulating the seed proteome. Plant Sci. 2022, 324, 111428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. İşeri, Ö.D.; Sahin, F.I.; Haberal, M. Sodium Chloride Priming Improves Salinity Response of Tomato at Seedling Stage. J. Plant Nutr. 2014, 37, 374–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Vanitha, C.; Kathiravan, M.; Umarani, R.; Sathiya, K.; Menaka, C.; Yuvaraj, M.; Cyriac, J. Seed Priming with Nano Silica Alleviates Drought Stress through Regulating Antioxidant Defense System and Osmotic Adjustment in Soybean (Glycine max L.). Silicon 2024, 16, 2157–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Jatana, B.S.; Grover, S.; Ram, H.; Baath, G.S. Seed Priming: Molecular and Physiological Mechanisms Underlying Biotic and Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Agronomy 2024, 14, 2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Hussain, S.; Zheng, M.; Khan, F.; Khaliq, A.; Fahad, S.; Peng, S.; Huang, J.; Cui, K.; Nie, L. Benefits of rice seed priming are offset permanently by prolonged storage and the storage conditions. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Sheteiwy, M.S.; Dong, Q.; An, J.; Song, W.; Guan, Y.; He, F.; Huang, Y.; Hu, J. Regulation of ZnO nanoparticles-induced physiological and molecular changes by seed priming with humic acid in Oryza sativa seedlings. Plant Growth Regul. 2017, 83, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Sheteiwy, M.S.; Gong, D.; Gao, Y.; Pan, R.; Hu, J.; Guan, Y. Priming with methyl jasmonate alleviates polyethylene glycol-induced osmotic stress in rice seeds by regulating the seed metabolic profile. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 153, 236–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Alcantara, B.K.; Rizzi, V.; Gaziola, S.A.; Azevedo, R.A. Soluble amino acid profile, mineral nutrient and carbohydrate content of maize kernels harvested from plants submitted to ascorbic acid seed priming. Ann. Braz. Acad. Sci. 2016, 89, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Rice-Evans, C. Screening of Phenolics and Flavonoids for Antioxidant Activity. In Antioxidant Food Supplements in Human Health; Packer, L., Hiramatsu, M., Yoshikawa, T., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1999; pp. 239–253. ISBN 978-0-12-543590-1. [Google Scholar]
  167. Marcos, F.C.C.; Silveira, N.M.; Mokochinski, J.B.; Sawaya, A.C.H.F.; Marchiori, P.E.R.; Machado, E.C.; Souza, G.M.; Landell, M.G.A.; Ribeiro, R.V. Drought tolerance of sugarcane is improved by previous exposure to water deficit. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 223, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Virlouvet, L.; Avenson, T.J.; Du, Q.; Zhang, C.; Liu, N.; Fromm, M.; Avramova, Z.; Russo, S.E. Dehydration Stress Memory: Gene Networks Linked to Physiological Responses During Repeated Stresses of Zea mays. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Wang, W.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Huang, M.; Cai, J.; Zhou, Q.; Dai, T.; Jiang, D. Salicylic acid and cold priming induce late-spring freezing tolerance by maintaining cellular redox homeostasis and protecting photosynthetic apparatus in wheat. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 90, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Bäurle, I.; Trindade, I. Chromatin regulation of somatic abiotic stress memory. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 5269–5279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Manoharlal, R.; Saiprasad, G.V.S.; Kovařík, A. Gene-specific DNA demethylation changes associates with ethylene induced germination of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Plant Physiol. Rep. 2019, 24, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Nguyen, H.M.; Kim, M.; Ralph, P.J.; Marín-Guirao, L.; Pernice, M.; Procaccini, G. Stress Memory in Seagrasses: First Insight Into the Effects of Thermal Priming and the Role of Epigenetic Modifications. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Manoharlal, R.; Saiprasad, G.V.S. Global histone H3 hyperacetylation-associated epigenetic changes induced in ethephon-primed sprouts of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2020, 42, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Chandrasekaran, U.; Luo, X.; Wang, Q.; Shu, K. Are There Unidentified Factors Involved in the Germination of Nanoprimed Seeds? Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Donia, D.T.; Carbone, M. Seed Priming with Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles to Enhance Crop Tolerance to Environmental Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 17612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Acharya, P.; Jayaprakasha, G.K.; Crosby, K.M.; Jifon, J.L.; Patil, B.S. Nanoparticle-Mediated Seed Priming Improves Germination, Growth, Yield, and Quality of Watermelons (Citrullus lanatus) at multi-locations in Texas. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Hatami, M.; Kariman, K.; Ghorbanpour, M. Engineered nanomaterial-mediated changes in the metabolism of terrestrial plants. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 571, 275–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. List of chemical and non-chemical seed priming methods.
Figure 1. List of chemical and non-chemical seed priming methods.
Cimb 47 00177 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of different chemical SPAs used as determined by 153 peer-reviewed papers over the past 3 years. The other category includes amino acids, chitosan, plant extracts, wood distillates, and antioxidants, which do not easily fit into other SPA classes. The full list of references from which this figure was created can be found in Supplementary Materials File S1.
Figure 2. Distribution of different chemical SPAs used as determined by 153 peer-reviewed papers over the past 3 years. The other category includes amino acids, chitosan, plant extracts, wood distillates, and antioxidants, which do not easily fit into other SPA classes. The full list of references from which this figure was created can be found in Supplementary Materials File S1.
Cimb 47 00177 g002
Figure 3. Modes of action for SPAs to achieve their three major purposes (improved germination, stress tolerance, and growth).
Figure 3. Modes of action for SPAs to achieve their three major purposes (improved germination, stress tolerance, and growth).
Cimb 47 00177 g003
Table 1. List of the most studied chemical SPAs from 2022 to 2024 as determined by the frequency of their use in 153 peer-reviewed articles. Efficacy refers to the percentage of reported studies where the SPA demonstrated significantly improved response versus hydropriming. The full list of 153 studies is shown in Supplementary Materials File S1.
Table 1. List of the most studied chemical SPAs from 2022 to 2024 as determined by the frequency of their use in 153 peer-reviewed articles. Efficacy refers to the percentage of reported studies where the SPA demonstrated significantly improved response versus hydropriming. The full list of 153 studies is shown in Supplementary Materials File S1.
Common Primer
(% of Studies)
Primer ClassEfficacy
(%)
Plants Studied
1. Salicylic acid (18%)Hormone100Peppers, chia, sesame, barley, peas, cotton, rice, wheat, barley, cucumber, lentils, mung bean, corn, canola, cantaloupe, wild sunflower, kidney bean, zucchini, eggplant, cumin, hargel
2. Zn (16%)Nutri100Millet, gourd, corn, mung bean, peas, rice, spinach, chick peas, wheat, sesame, quinoa, corn, rice, peppers, eggplant, safflower, lettuce
3. Gibberellic acid (13%)Hormone90Carrot, tomato, sunflower, rice, legumes, alhagi, okra, cotton, barley, hargel, cucumber, tomato, wheat, cowpea, chia, lettuce
4. KNO3 (12%)Halo68Carrot, lettuce, sunflower, rice, wheat, mustard, cotton, tomato, cucumber, chick pea, wild sunflower, corn, cowpea, pepper, chia
5. Se (9%)Nutri100Quinoa, tomato, jalapeno, turnip, bok choy, wheat, sorghum, mustard, rice, canola
6. CaCl2 (9%)Halo86Lettuce, barley, mustard, wheat, peas, rice, allium, canola
7. PEG (8%)Osmo92Tomato, wheat, Chinese skullcap, onion, cauliflower, peppers, allium, tomato
8. Chitosan (7%)Other100Ashwagandha, corn, lettuce, mung bean, wheat, clover, cumin
9. Melatonin (5%)PGR100Zinnia, peanuts, halophytes, wheat, corn, rice, triticale
10. Ascorbic acid (5%)PGR71Rice, wheat, molinga, broccoli, stevia
Table 2. Summary of some most studied seed priming agents (SPAs), their target crops, and their mode of action.
Table 2. Summary of some most studied seed priming agents (SPAs), their target crops, and their mode of action.
Seed Priming AgentCropModes of Action
SeleniumRice, WheatActivates antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, CAT), increases chlorophyll content, and enhances stress tolerance [122,125].
Ascorbic AcidBroccoliIncreases carotenoid content, protects chloroplasts, maintains photosynthetic machinery, and modulates ABA.
Zn Oxide NanoparticlesBitter GourdEnhances phenolic and flavonoid content, and improves phytochemical profile [137].
Sodium NitroprussideWheatActivates antioxidant defense, enhances phenolic content, and improves photosynthesis and transpiration [138].
MelatoninMaize Reduces membrane permeability, enhances photosynthetic efficiency, and protects chlorophyll [139,140].
Gibberellic AcidCucumber, RapeseedIncreases photosynthesis, transpiration rates, and chlorophyll content [141,142].
Salicylic AcidZucchiniEnhances photosynthesis, antioxidant capacity, and chlorophyll content [83].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

MacDonald, M.T.; Mohan, V.R. Chemical Seed Priming: Molecules and Mechanisms for Enhancing Plant Germination, Growth, and Stress Tolerance. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47030177

AMA Style

MacDonald MT, Mohan VR. Chemical Seed Priming: Molecules and Mechanisms for Enhancing Plant Germination, Growth, and Stress Tolerance. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2025; 47(3):177. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47030177

Chicago/Turabian Style

MacDonald, Mason T., and Vijaya R. Mohan. 2025. "Chemical Seed Priming: Molecules and Mechanisms for Enhancing Plant Germination, Growth, and Stress Tolerance" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 47, no. 3: 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47030177

APA Style

MacDonald, M. T., & Mohan, V. R. (2025). Chemical Seed Priming: Molecules and Mechanisms for Enhancing Plant Germination, Growth, and Stress Tolerance. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 47(3), 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47030177

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop