Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors for Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Ozone-Mediated Modulation of Green Tea Extract Enhances Bioactive Compounds and Therapeutic Potential Relevant to Human Health
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Antifungal Mechanism Effect of Artemisinin on Fusarium solani

by
César Espinoza
1,
Francisco Roberto Quiroz-Figueroa
2,
Oswaldo Guzmán-López
3,
Eliel Ruiz-May
4,
Verónica Gallegos-García
5,
Alejandro Salinas-Castro
1,
Giovanny García-Serrano
6 and
Thuluz Meza-Menchaca
6,*
1
Centro de Investigación en Micología Aplicada, Universidad Veracruzana, Médicos 5, Unidad del Bosque, Xalapa-Enríquez 91010, Mexico
2
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional (CIIDIR)—Unidad Sinaloa, Guasave 81101, Mexico
3
Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Coatzacoalcos 96523, Mexico
4
Laboratorio de Farmacología, Escuela Militar de Graduados de Sanidad, Universidad del Ejército y Fuerza Aérea, Ciudad de México 11200, Mexico
5
Escuela de Enfermería y Nutrición, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí 78290, Mexico
6
Laboratorio de Investigación Médico-Biológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Veracruzana, Médicos y Odontólogos, Virginia Cordero de Murillo Vidal, Xalapa-Enríquez 91017, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(11), 1696; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18111696 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 4 October 2025 / Revised: 28 October 2025 / Accepted: 6 November 2025 / Published: 8 November 2025

Abstract

Background: Fusarium solani (Fs), a drug-resistant phytopathogenic fungus, is a major cause of severe infections in both plants and humans. Artemisia annua and its derivatives exhibit antimicrobial, antiviral and anticholesterolemic activities, yet their clinical use has been dominated by potent antimalarial and anticancer effects. Artemisinin (ART), a sesquiterpene lactone isolated from A. annua, is well recognized for its antimalarial efficacy but remains underexplored as an antifungal agent. Methods: Conidia of Fs were treated with increasing concentrations of ART (75–500 μM) for 0 and 24 h. Fungal viability was assessed using viability assays. Membrane permeability was examined using confocal laser scanning microscopy with propidium iodide (PI) staining. Protein carbonylation assays were performed to quantify oxidative damage induced by ART. Results: A 24 h, ART exposure reduced Fs viability in a dose-dependent manner, with an IC50 of 147.5 μM. At 500 μM, ART achieved fungicidal activity with 99% growth inhibition. Confocal microscopy confirmed extensive membrane disruption in ART-treated conidia, while carbonylation assays demonstrated marked protein oxidation, supporting a mechanism involving free radical generation from the peroxide bridge of ART. ART exhibits potent antifungal activity against Fs, mediated by oxidative stress, membrane disruption and protein carbonylation. Conclusions: These findings highlight ART as a promising candidate for antifungal drug development against resistant Fusarium species.

1. Introduction

Fusariosis is a well-documented infection in plants by Fusarium species, a significant soil-inhabiting phytopathogen causing huge losses in agriculture. Besides affecting crop fields, Fusarium spp. are capable of inducing infections in animals and humans, mostly in immunocompromised patients [1]. Ranked among non-dermatophytic pathogenic moulds in the company of Aspergillus, Scopulariopsis, Alternaria, and Acremonium spp. Fusarium has been associated with varied clinical conditions like onychomycosis [2,3], keratitis [4], and endophthalmitis [5]. Out of many Fusarium species, Fusarium solani (Fs) has the highest isolation frequency in clinical cases and hence is of special biomedical relevance in the present study [6].
Fusariosis is identified as one of the two most prevalent mould infections in immunocompromised patients, after Aspergillus spp. infections. Fs is also one of the most widely dispersed filamentous fungi in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Its ability to rapidly adapt through evolution, possibly by virtue of higher mutation rates participating in DNA repair mismatches [7], enhances its robustness and pathogenic potential. Crucially, recent evidence demonstrates the possibility of Fs in allowing cross-kingdom transmission, with even recorded cases of infections being transferred from humans to maize [8]. Others have identified sophisticated fungal–bacterial interactions within infected tomato fruits [9]. Collectively, these reports reveal the ecological versatilities and pathogenic potencies of Fs and have important consequences in agriculture and in human health.
Antimicrobial agents are critical in the treatment of infectious diseases caused by pathogenic microorganisms through a range of mechanisms of action. With the fortuitous serendipitous discovery of penicillin in the 1920s, the discovery of antibiotics has revolutionized the science of medicine over the past century. Following up on traditional methods of empiricism in traditional forms of medicine, investigation of Artemisia annua L. (Asteraceae) has confirmed considerable antiplasmodial effectiveness in malaria. Through systematic experimental analysis, Chinese researchers investigated the traditional herbal remedy qinghaosu and identified that the plant leaves contain exceptionally high levels of a sesquiterpene lactone defined by an unusual endoperoxide bridge (a seven-membered ring incorporating peroxide). Since entering into clinical therapy, ART has saved millions of lives and significantly enhanced health benefits worldwide [10]. The compound ART has remarkable specificity by alkylating proteins and other macromolecules in target cells and tissues. However, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying its effectiveness are still in part unknown [11].
Previously, our group established that singlet oxygen has the ability to permeabilize lipid bilayers enriched in ergosterol to rupture membranes upon photosensitization. This phenomenon has been demonstrated using Candida tropicalis and otherwise verified through atomic force microscopy visualizations of bilayers containing sterol. These results justify an efficient antifungal modality specifically targeting membrane-enriched fungi containing ergosterol in a simple and efficient treatment modality [12].
Considering the distinctive mechanism of action exhibited by artemisinin and the susceptibility of membranes enriched with ergosterol, the current investigation intends to explore the diverse therapeutic attributes of ART in relation to the prevalent fungal pathogen Fs. Through the clarification of ART’s antifungal efficacy and possible mechanisms of action, this study aspires to integrate perspectives from plant pathology and antimicrobial treatment, thus promoting novel approaches to address infections caused by Fs.

2. Results

2.1. Cytotoxicity Assay

ART treatments against Fs conidia revealed stable cell viability in non-exposed groups (95–99%), with minimal reductions across controls and lower ART concentrations. However, following 24 h exposure, a concentration-dependent decrease in cell viability was observed. The calculated IC50 for ART was 147.5 μM (Figure 1).
Growth inhibition assays demonstrated that ART exerted a fungicidal effect at 500 μM, achieving 99% inhibition of Fs. At lower concentrations (350, 200, and 150 μM), ART displayed fungistatic activity, corresponding to inhibition rates of 82, 64 and 48%, respectively, after 24 h of expo-sure. Following 24 h exposure of Fs conidia to ART at concentrations of 500, 300, and 150 μM, cell viability was assessed. A control group was included using sterile distilled water. To further evaluate membrane integrity, the treated samples were subjected to propidium iodide (PI) staining and analyzed via confocal laser scanning microscopy.

2.2. In Situ ART-Induced Membrane Permeability

As stated above, confocal microscopy is connected to reactive oxygen species (ROS) detection, as reactive oxygen species are compartmentalized and mobile, and it is all timed and spatially-dependent upon when they are generated. So, with that said, building on previous cytotoxicity studies of peroxide-based compounds [12], we examined whether ART induced membrane permeability sufficient to permit PI entry a marker of compromised membrane integrity. Fs conidia treated with ART exhibited a pronounced increase in red fluorescence, consistent with extensive membrane damage and enhanced permeability (Figure 2). Conidia exposed to 500 μM ART were uniformly PI-positive, showing widespread internal staining and confirming complete membrane disruption. By contrast, control conidia treated with sterile water displayed no intra-cellular PI signal, with fluorescence confined to the membrane periphery.

2.3. Oxidative Damage as the Mechanism of ART Fungicidal Activity

The data indicate that ART’s fungicidal properties derive from cleavage of its peroxide bridge, generating ROS that inflict oxidative damage on lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids consistent with the membrane permeabilization observed by confocal microscopy. To assess whether this oxidative damage was driven by peroxide bond homolysis, we quantified post-treatment carbonyl levels using a protein carbonylation assay (Figure 3). One-way ANOVA revealed a significant overall effect of treatment on protein carbonylation (F(5, 48) = 26.81, p < 0.0001). Post hoc Tukey’s tests confirmed that ART and H2O2 treatment groups displayed significantly higher carbonylation compared to untreated controls (p < 0.001), whereas ergosterol peroxide, DMSO, and fluconazole did not differ significantly from control. A marked increase in carbonylated proteins was detected in cells treated with ergosterol peroxide, relative to untreated controls or vehicle (DMSO) alone.
Together with the concentration-dependent reduction in conidial viability (IC50 = 147.5 μM) and the growth inhibition assays demonstrating fungicidal activity at 500 μM and fungistatic effects at lower concentrations, these results provide a coherent mechanistic model. ART acts via peroxide-mediated free radical generation, culminating in oxidative biomolecular injury and ultimately driving fungal growth suppression.

3. Discussion

Among the Fusarium species studied, Fs demonstrated notable resistance to several antifungal agents, including flucytosine, ketoconazole, miconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, and posaconazole [13]. These findings, combined with the limitations of conventional antifungal therapies such as toxicity, adverse effects, high cost, low biocompatibility, and multidrug resistance highlight the urgent need for the development of novel therapeutic compounds.
Recent studies have evaluated the antifungal potential of Artemisia annua extracts against Fusarium spp., primarily in the context of agricultural applications targeting pathogenic consortia in plant roots [14,15,16,17,18]. In one such study, extract concentrations as low as 4 μL/mL were effective. This efficacy has been attributed to the extract’s phytochemical composition, which includes camphor, borneol, deoxyartemisinin, and β-caryophyllene oxide [19,20].
However, ART, the principal antimalarial compound derived from A. annua, represents only a small fraction, approximately 0.01%, of the plant’s dry biomass [21], presenting scalability challenges for therapeutic use.
Despite this limitation, our findings demonstrate that ART alone is sufficient to exert a significant antifungal effect. While many studies have focused on crude A. annua extracts, our results underscore ART as the primary active agent in suppressing Fs growth.
Interestingly, among the Fusarium spp. studied, Fs has been shown to exhibit greater resistance to flucytosine, ketoconazole, miconazole, fluconazole, itraconazole, and posaconazole [22]. Current pharmacological options are limited by drug toxicity, adverse side effects, high costs, low biocompatibility, and multidrug resistance. These issues underscore the importance of re-searching and expanding the repertoire of proven therapeutic compounds available for common diseases.
Earlier reports have documented antifungal activity of Artemisia annua extracts against species of the Fusarium genus, primarily in the context of agricultural control of Fusarium and other root-associated pathogenic consortia [23,24]. In another study, authors evaluated A. annua against Fusarium spp. at concentrations as low as 4 μL/mL. The chemical composition of the extract may confer advantages due to the presence of camphor, borneol, deoxyartemisinin, and β-caryophyllene oxide [25]. Nevertheless, it is important to note that previous studies have emphasized that ART, a constituent of A. annua leaves, represents only a minor fraction of the total herbal biomass—sometimes as low as 0.01% of the dry weight [26]. This low abundance is a critical factor when considering treatment strategies. Therefore, although several recent efforts have focused on treating F. solani with A. annua extracts, we demonstrate here that ART alone is sufficient to produce a significant antifungal effect.
In the present work, the antifungal effect of ART was evaluated and shown to significantly reduce the growth of Fs within 24 h compared with negative controls. To our knowledge, this is the first report not only demonstrating the effect of ART on Fs. but also examining its intracellular localization within the fungal nucleus. Artemisinin’s antifungal activity is greatly ROS-mediated: homolytic cleavage of its endoperoxide linkage generates reactive ROS that attack cellular lipid bilayers and proteins. ROS-mediated oxidative stress of membrane structure and protein activity leads to killing of fungal cells. In keeping with such paradigm, confocal imaging of propidium iodide (PI)–labeled Fs conidia treated with ART demonstrated large-scale membrane permeabilization, while protein carbonylation assays reflected an extensive increase in oxidatively modified protein. Together, these results prove that broad-scale membrane destruction as well as protein oxidation by ART-radicals are responsible for the potent cytotoxic antifungal activity observed. These data are in keeping with those obtained by confocal and carbonylation studies. Taken together, these findings suggest that ART warrants further evaluation in animal models, such as murine systems, to assess its potential as a therapeutic candidate, given its favorable chemical properties and prospects for future clinical trials in humans.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Fungal Strain

The Fs isolate employed in this study was originally obtained from infected plant tissue, as described previously [8]. The human-pathogenetic fungal strain were rest isolated from 13 non-immunocompromised or-non immunosuppressed patients with keratomycosis and authorization were obtained by courtesy of the hospital at “El Hospital para Prevenir la Ceguera en México, Luis Sánchez Bulnes” among January/2013 to August/2016. Patients from nine Mexican states. The isolate was purified, taxonomically verified through morphological assessment and internal transcribed spacer rDNA sequencing, and routinely propagated on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) at 25 ± 2 °C. Subcultures were maintained twice per week to ensure viability and phenotypic stability.

4.2. Compound Preparation and Fungal Inhibition Assay

ART, a sesquiterpene lactone originally isolated from Artemisia annua, was purchased commercially from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used without further purification. The compound was freshly prepared prior to each experiment and handled under light-protected conditions to preserve stability. As previously reported by our group, a 750 μM stock solution of artemisinin (ART; >95% purity, HPLC-verified) was prepared in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), from which working dilutions of 500, 350, 200, 150, and 75 μM were generated. In parallel, distilled water and 0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were prepared as negative growth controls. All solutions were sterilized by vacuum filtration using a polyethersulfone (PES) membrane filter (0.2 μm pore size; Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany). A 10 mL suspension of Fs conidia, standardized to 2 × 106 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL, was used to evaluate the fungicidal and/or fungistatic effects of ART and controls.
Two experimental conditions were established: (1) immediate plating (0 h exposure), and (2) 24 h exposure at 25 ± 2 °C prior to plating. For the non-exposure condition, 1 mL of each ART dilution or control was mixed with the Fs conidial suspension and plated directly onto PDA in Petri dishes, followed by incubation at 25 ± 2 °C for 24 h. For the exposure condition, ART–Fs suspensions were incubated at 25 ± 2 °C for 24 h prior to plating under identical conditions.
All experiments were conducted in triplicate and independently repeated three times. Following incubation, CFUs were quantified for each treatment and condition using a digital colony counter in combination with a MiniLight Box (Upland, CA, USA).

4.3. Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy

To assess fungal membrane integrity after ART treatment, propidium iodide (PI; 1 mg/mL) was added to cell suspensions exposed to ART for 24 h at 25 ± 2 °C. PI uptake was used as a marker of membrane compromise. Samples were analyzed using a confocal scanning laser microscope (Leica DMI 6000) equipped (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) with a 543 nm helium–neon laser for fluorescence excitation (Leica TCS-SP8) (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

4.4. Carbonylation Assay

Fs cultures were initiated at a density of 1 × 106 cells in 15 mL medium and incubated to the logarithmic phase. Cell density was determined by direct counting with a hemocytometer. Cells were washed twice with sterile phosphate-buffered saline and centrifuged at 2000× g. The pellet was resuspended in LIT complete medium to a final density of 4 × 105 cells/mL. A 500 μL aliquot of each suspension was transferred to a 96-well plate for incubation and treatment.
Cells were incubated for 24 h at 28 °C under 150 μM artemisinin dissolved (<1% DMSO) and fluconazole (FLZ, 32 μg/mL ≈ 104.5 μM, water stock adjusted to <1% DMSO in-well). Vehicle for negative control was treated with only <1% DMSO. H2O2 (100 μM) was used for positive control of oxidation. Two negative controls ultrapure Milli-Q water and Milli-Q water with dodecyl bisulfate (each equivalent to <1% DMSO) were employed. The percentage of DMSO was made equivalent for all the conditions. Triplicate wells per condition were treated for 24 h at 28 °C. All conditions were assayed thrice in triplicate and repeated three times independently.
Following incubation, cells were lysed and carbonyl groups quantified using 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) derivatization. Equal volumes (1 mL each) of cell lysate and 20 mM DNPH in 1.5 M HCl were mixed and incubated at 25 °C. Protein precipitation was achieved with 20% trichloroacetic acid, followed by chilling on ice for 15 min and centrifugation at 12,500× g for 10 min. The protein pellet was washed twice with ethanol:ethyl acetate (1:1 v/v), dissolved in 2 mL of 8.5 M guanidine-HCl (pH 7.4), and vortexed. Absorbance was measured at 370 nm, and carbonyl content was calculated using a molar extinction coefficient of 22,000 M−1 cm−1, in accordance with Hartley’s method.

5. Conclusions

In summary, ART significantly inhibited the growth of FS within 24 h, with evidence of intracellular localization and oxidative damage potentially driven by endoperoxide cleavage. Carbonyl accumulation confirmed ROS generation as the core fungicidal mechanism. These findings identify ART as a promising antifungal candidate for in vivo validation and potential clinical development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.M.-M. and C.E.; methodology, C.E.; validation, T.M.-M.; formal analysis, C.E.; investigation, O.G.-L., G.G.-S. and V.G.-G.; resources, F.R.Q.-F.; data curation, C.E. and A.S.-C.; writing—original draft preparation, V.G.-G.; writing—review and editing, T.M.-M., C.E. and E.R.-M.; visualization, F.R.Q.-F. and E.R.-M.; supervision, F.R.Q.-F.; project administration, C.E., A.S.-C. and T.M.-M.; funding acquisition, C.E. and T.M.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The experiments were partially funded by SECIHTI (CBF-2025-1-1519), and the APC was funded by the General Directorate of Research, Universidad Veracruzana.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to E.M.C. and Alicia K. Gabriel-Sánchez for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ARTArtemisinin
FsFusarium solani

References

  1. Gomez, L.B.; Ward, T.J.; Badiale-Furlong, E.; Del Ponte, E.M. Species composition, toxigenic potential and pathogenicity of Fusarium graminearum species complex isolates from southern Brazilian rice. Plant Pathol. 2014, 64, 980–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Moreno, G.; Arenas, R. Other fungi causing onychomycosis. Clin. Dermatol. 2010, 28, 160–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bongomin, F.; Batac, C.; Richardson, M.D.; Denning, D.W. A review of onychomycosis due to Aspergillus species. Mycopathologia 2018, 183, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Szaliński, M.; Zgryźniak, A.; Rubisz, I.; Gajdzis, M.; Kaczmarek, R.; Przeździecka-Dołyk, J. Fusarium keratitis—Review of current treatment possibilities. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dursun, D.; Ozdek, S.; Mistik, S.; Tamer, C.; Ozturk, F. Advanced Fusarium keratitis progressing to endophthalmitis. Cornea 2003, 22, 300–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nucci, M.; Anaissie, E. Invasive fusariosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2023, 36, e0015922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gambhir, N.; Harris, S.D.; Everhart, S.E. Evolutionary significance of fungal hypermutators: Lessons learned from clinical strains and implications for fungal plant pathogens. mSphere 2022, 7, e0008722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Meza-Menchaca, T.; Singh, R.K.; Quiroz-Chávez, J.; García-Pérez, L.M.; Rodríguez-Mora, N.; Soto-Luna, M.; Gastélum-Contreras, G.; Vanzzini-Zago, V.; Sharma, L.; Quiroz-Figueroa, F.R. First demonstration of clinical Fusarium strains causing cross-kingdom infections from humans to plants. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, F.; Liang, J.; Zhao, P.; Tsui, C.K.; Cai, L. Cross-kingdom synthetic microbiota supports tomato suppression of Fusarium wilt disease. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 7890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Su, X.Z.; Miller, L.H. The discovery of artemisinin and the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Sci. China Life Sci. 2015, 58, 1175–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Geng, Y.; Li, W.; Wong, N.K.; Xue, F.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Deng, Z.; Zhou, Y. Discovery of artemisinins as microsomal prostaglandin synthase-2 inhibitors for the treatment of colorectal cancer via chemoproteomics. J. Med. Chem. 2024, 67, 2083–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Meza-Menchaca, T.; Ramos-Ligonio, A.; López-Monteon, A.; Vidal Limón, A.; Kaluzhskiy, L.A.; Shkel, T.V.; Strushkevich, N.V.; Jiménez-García, L.F.; Agredano Moreno, L.T.; Gallegos-García, V.; et al. Insights into ergosterol peroxide’s trypanocidal activity. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Espinoza, C.; González, M.C.R.; Mendoza, G.; Creus, A.H.; Trigos, Á.; Fernández, J.J. Exploring photosensitization as an efficient antifungal method. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Atta, S.; Perera, C.; Kowalski, R.P.; Jhanji, V. Fungal Keratitis: Clinical Features, Risk Factors, Treatment, and Outcomes. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, K.M.; Dong, X.; Ma, Y.N.; Wu, Z.H.; Yan, Y.M.; Cheng, Y.X. Antifungal coumarins and lignans from Artemisia annua. Fitoterapia 2019, 134, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ma, Y.N.; Chen, C.J.; Li, Q.Q.; Xu, F.R.; Cheng, Y.X.; Dong, X. Monitoring antifungal agents of Artemisia annua against Fusarium oxysporum and Fusarium solani, associated with Panax notoginseng root-rot disease. Molecules 2019, 24, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zheng, L.P.; Guo, Y.T.; Wang, J.W.; Tan, R.X. Nitric oxide potentiates oligosaccharide-induced artemisinin production in Artemisia annua hairy roots. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2008, 50, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ahlawat, S.; Saxena, P.; Alam, P.; Wajid, S.; Abdin, M.Z. Modulation of artemisinin biosynthesis by elicitors, inhibitor, and precursor in hairy root cultures of Artemisia annua L. J. Plant Interact. 2014, 9, 811–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bertea, C.M.; Freije, J.R.; van der Woude, H.; Verstappen, F.W.A.; Perk, L.; Marquez, V.; De Kraker, J.-W.; Posthumus, M.A.; Jansen, B.J.M.; de Groot, A.; et al. Identification of intermediates and enzymes involved in the early steps of artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. Planta Med. 2005, 71, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Woerdenbag, H.J.; Bos, R.; Salomons, M.C.; Hendriks, H.; Pras, N.; Malingré, T.M. Volatile constituents of Artemisia annua L. (Asteraceae). Flavour Fragr. J. 1993, 8, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Q.; Wu, N.; Jian, D.; Jiang, R.; Yang, C.; Lan, X.; Chen, M.; Zhang, F.; Liao, Z. Overexpression of AaPIF3 promotes artemisinin production in Artemisia annua. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 138, 111476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ferrer, C.; Alio, J.; Rodriguez, A.; Andreu, M.; Colom, F. Endophthalmitis caused by Fusarium proliferatum. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 5372–5375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kong, W.; Xie, Z.; Huo, H.; Jia, P.; Zhang, A.; Liang, J.; Wang, J. Anti-Fusarium activity of essential oil distilled from artemisinin (Artemisia annua L.) extraction residues. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2023, 158, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Numonov, S.; Sharopov, F.; Salimov, A.; Sukhrobov, P.; Atolikshoeva, S.; Safarzoda, R.; Habasi, M.; Aisa, H. Assessment of artemisinin contents in selected Artemisia species from Tajikistan (Central Asia). Medicines 2019, 6, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Čavar Željković, S.; Maksimović, M.; Vidic, D. Chemical Composition and Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oil of Artemisia annua L. from Bosnia. Ind. Crops Prod. 2012, 37, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. El-Naggar, E.B.; Azazi, M.; Švajdlenka, E.; Žemlička, M. Artemisinin from Minor to Major Ingredient in Artemisia annua. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 3, 116–123. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Viability of Fs conidia following ART treatment. ART treatment showed a progressive, concentration-dependent reduction in cell viability. Negative controls (H2O and 0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]) are shown on the left for reference. The data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with Tukey’s post hoc test using Mitinab 19 software, and a significance level of 0.05. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between treatments.
Figure 1. Viability of Fs conidia following ART treatment. ART treatment showed a progressive, concentration-dependent reduction in cell viability. Negative controls (H2O and 0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]) are shown on the left for reference. The data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with Tukey’s post hoc test using Mitinab 19 software, and a significance level of 0.05. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between treatments.
Pharmaceuticals 18 01696 g001
Figure 2. Confocal microscopy of Fs conidia stained with propidium iodide (PI) following ART treatment. Panels (AC) show conidia exposed to 500, 300, and 150 μM ART, respectively, exhibiting increased red fluorescence consistent with membrane damage and enhanced permeability. Panel (D) shows the growth control (sterile H2O), with minimal PI uptake and fluorescence restricted to the membrane surface. For each treatment, images are displayed as: (1) overlay, (2) PI fluorescence, and (3) transmitted light.
Figure 2. Confocal microscopy of Fs conidia stained with propidium iodide (PI) following ART treatment. Panels (AC) show conidia exposed to 500, 300, and 150 μM ART, respectively, exhibiting increased red fluorescence consistent with membrane damage and enhanced permeability. Panel (D) shows the growth control (sterile H2O), with minimal PI uptake and fluorescence restricted to the membrane surface. For each treatment, images are displayed as: (1) overlay, (2) PI fluorescence, and (3) transmitted light.
Pharmaceuticals 18 01696 g002
Figure 3. Bar graph showing carbonyl concentrations in Fs cells following different treatments. Lane 1, untreated control; Lane 2, <1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO); Lane 3, ergosterol peroxide (40 μM); Lane 4, ergosterol (40 μM); Lane 5, hydrogen peroxide (120 μM); Lane 6, ergosterol peroxide in the absence of cells. All treatments were applied to suspensions containing 104 cells/mL. A statistically significant increase in protein carbonylation was observed in cells treated with ergosterol peroxide (*** p ≤ 0.05, one-way non-parametric ANOVA).
Figure 3. Bar graph showing carbonyl concentrations in Fs cells following different treatments. Lane 1, untreated control; Lane 2, <1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO); Lane 3, ergosterol peroxide (40 μM); Lane 4, ergosterol (40 μM); Lane 5, hydrogen peroxide (120 μM); Lane 6, ergosterol peroxide in the absence of cells. All treatments were applied to suspensions containing 104 cells/mL. A statistically significant increase in protein carbonylation was observed in cells treated with ergosterol peroxide (*** p ≤ 0.05, one-way non-parametric ANOVA).
Pharmaceuticals 18 01696 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Espinoza, C.; Quiroz-Figueroa, F.R.; Guzmán-López, O.; Ruiz-May, E.; Gallegos-García, V.; Salinas-Castro, A.; García-Serrano, G.; Meza-Menchaca, T. Antifungal Mechanism Effect of Artemisinin on Fusarium solani. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 1696. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18111696

AMA Style

Espinoza C, Quiroz-Figueroa FR, Guzmán-López O, Ruiz-May E, Gallegos-García V, Salinas-Castro A, García-Serrano G, Meza-Menchaca T. Antifungal Mechanism Effect of Artemisinin on Fusarium solani. Pharmaceuticals. 2025; 18(11):1696. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18111696

Chicago/Turabian Style

Espinoza, César, Francisco Roberto Quiroz-Figueroa, Oswaldo Guzmán-López, Eliel Ruiz-May, Verónica Gallegos-García, Alejandro Salinas-Castro, Giovanny García-Serrano, and Thuluz Meza-Menchaca. 2025. "Antifungal Mechanism Effect of Artemisinin on Fusarium solani" Pharmaceuticals 18, no. 11: 1696. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18111696

APA Style

Espinoza, C., Quiroz-Figueroa, F. R., Guzmán-López, O., Ruiz-May, E., Gallegos-García, V., Salinas-Castro, A., García-Serrano, G., & Meza-Menchaca, T. (2025). Antifungal Mechanism Effect of Artemisinin on Fusarium solani. Pharmaceuticals, 18(11), 1696. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18111696

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop