Next Article in Journal
Influence of Gut Microbiota-Mediated Immune Regulation on Response to Chemotherapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Antibiofilm Effect of Sertraline in Synergy with Cinnamomum verum Essential Oil to Counteract Candida Species
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanistic Sequence of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors and Radiation Treatment: An Overview
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Matricaria aurea Essential Oils on Biofilm Development, Virulence Factors and Quorum Sensing-Dependent Genes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Phellodendron Amurense Ruprecht Extract as a Natural Anti-Caries Material

1
Department of Dental Hygiene, Silla University, Busan 46958, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Oral Anatomy, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Kangwon National University, Samcheok 25945, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(5), 603; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17050603
Submission received: 12 April 2024 / Revised: 26 April 2024 / Accepted: 2 May 2024 / Published: 8 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Anti-Biofilm Agents)

Abstract

:
Background: This study aimed to investigate the antibacterial and cytotoxic potential of Phellodendron amurense Ruprecht (PAR) extract against Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and explore the possibility of using PAR extract as an anticariogenic agent. Methods: Mixed extracts were prepared at 0, 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/mL concentrations, and an S. mutans-containing solution of 100 μL was inoculated into the medium. The survival rate of human keratinocyte (HaCaT) cells was assessed to confirm stability. One-way ANOVA was performed to evaluate the antibacterial activity against S. mutans and the proliferation of HaCaT cells. Results: Higher concentrations of the PAR extract showed more growth inhibition of S. mutans over time, with the complete inactivation of S. mutans at 5 mg/mL. HaCaT cell density was reduced at a PAR extract concentration of 1.25 mg/mL, but IC50 was not observed, confirming that the concentration used did not affect the cytotoxicity and proliferation. Conclusions: Results showed that the PAR extract was excellent as a natural substance with anticariogenic effects that inhibited the growth of S. mutans and did not affect the cell viability, thus indicating the potential for clinical application.

1. Introduction

Dental caries is a chronic disease that occurs frequently in children and adults, causing oral health problems due to tooth loss, which affects an individual’s quality of life. The Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea conducts a survey on children’s oral health every three years, but the permanent tooth decay experience index decreases every year It has recently stagnated, and the DMFT index surveyed in 2018 is 1.84 in Korea, which is still higher than that of advanced countries such as the OECD [1].
Dental caries is a major cause of tooth loss, and, as a result, the economic burden for functional and aesthetic recovery increases and affects systemic health. Periodontal diseases, including dental caries, are associated with cardiovascular diseases such as heart disease and stroke, and may increase or exacerbate the risk of developing diabetes [2]. In addition, the risk of respiratory infections increases, along with complications of pregnancy, and the possibility of causing cognitive impairment such as Alzheimer’s disease has been suggested [3].
As a result of the long-term research on the etiology of dental caries, the concept of the disease has been continuously changing. In the past, dental caries was considered an infectious disease caused by pathogenic bacteria. As a representative causative agent, Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) is a bacterium that is transmitted from the mother at birth and causes caries. Like other infectious diseases, it eliminates pathogens, Efforts have been made to prevent human-to-human transmission [4]. However, in recent years, excessive sugar is supplied to the microbial group, a form of biofilm that survives in various ways in the oral cavity, resulting in an ecological imbalance in which acid-producing bacteria are converted into dominant species. Accordingly, it is understood that, as the acidity in the oral cavity changes, the process of tooth hard tissue decoction occurs, and, eventually, dental caries occur [5].
Because the inorganic loss of dental hard tissue increases in proportion to the number of highly acidic S. mutans, on the contrary, if the biofilm is composed of bacteria such as non-S. mutans and Actinomyces, which are advantageous for obtaining minerals, it is a more advantageous condition for obtaining the dynamic stability of minerals [6]. According to the recent hypothesis that a keystone pathogen, which plays an important role in the ecosystem, can control the ecological role of other bacteria, S. mutans is considered a key pathogen that promotes the growth of other acid-producing bacteria, resulting in an imbalance in oral microbial groups.
These bacteria organize themselves to form a biofilm through cell–cell interactions or connecting with other components, such as polysaccharides, proteins, and DNA, present in the medium [7]. S. mutans uses the available sugar to produce a sticky glycoprotein, forming dental plaque; thus, plaque formation begins with the ingestion of sucrose-containing products [8]. S. mutans produces the enzyme glucosyl transferase, which is involved in glycolysis [9]. This enzyme adds more glucose molecules to form dextran, which has a structure very similar to that of starch amylase. Dextran attaches firmly to tooth enamel and other bacteria, forming dental plaque [10]. Additionally, it produces lactic acid through glycolysis under anaerobic conditions and lowers the pH level, leading to the dissolution of calcium phosphates from tooth enamel [11].
Caries is a microbe-mediated disease, and mouthwashes containing fluoride, chlorhexidine, triclosan, cetylpyridinium chloride, and chlorophyll are commonly used for caries control. However, bacteria have evolved to survive in various environments and develop resistance to antibacterial reagents [12]. Reports have suggested the development of fluorine-resistant strains [13] and drug resistance against fluoride and chlorhexidine [14]. Therefore, in the case of chlorhexidine, which is most frequently used in dental clinical practice, its use should be limited to a short-term use in the high-risk group of caries with poor oral hygiene or severe dry mouth [15]. In addition, essential oils with antibacterial properties are also used in mouthwashes and toothpastes, but more research is needed on the effectiveness and safety of long-term use [16]. Recent studies have shown that antibacterial peptides (AMPs) destroy bacterial cell membranes and inhibit cell wall synthesis to exhibit extensive antibacterial activity against various bacteria, including S. mutans, but more research is needed on the mechanism and safety of AMPs [17]. In addition, a quorum-sensing inhibitor (QS), developed to interfere with the function of quorum sensing (QS), a microbial signal material delivery system, is reported to reduce the formation of biofilms by interfering with the communication between bacteria or decomposing autologous derivative enzymes, but research on safety is needed [18]. Chemical antimicrobials are widely used as disinfectants but with a poor regulation of biofilms and virulence factors. Notably, new compounds are necessary for the preventive treatment of dental caries because current therapeutic measures target both pathogens and commensal bacteria [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Thus, due to the increased bacterial resistance and side effects of antibacterial agents, research in the recent decade has shifted its focus to natural medicine [19,20,21,22,23,24].
Extracts of plant origin are generally recognized as safe by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and suitable for clinical application. These natural extracts can improve the efficacy of antibiotics against bacterial pathogens [19]. P. crocatum Ruiz and Pav contain secondary metabolites, such as essential oils, flavonoids, alkaloids, and phenolic compounds, with antibacterial efficacy against S. mutans [20]. Curcumin, a natural compound from ginger, effectively inhibits plaque-biofilm-associated cavities by inhibiting the formation of S. mutans biofilm [21]. Kaempferol is a type of flavonoid found in various plants and foods, such as kale, beans, tea, spinach, and broccoli, and its effect on inhibiting S. mutans has been confirmed [22]. Polyphenolic extracts from Chilean propolis exhibit antibacterial and antibiofilm effects against S. mutans at low concentrations [23]. Embelin can inhibit bacteria that cause periodontitis and tooth decay [24]. Thus, identifying natural medicines for effective oral antibacterial agents is a significant topic deserving continual attention from the research community.
This study used peeled and dried stem barks of Phellodendron amurense Ruprecht (PAR), a plant of the Rutaceae family growing wild in Japan, China, and all regions of Korea. PAR is a potent anti-inflammatory constituent of prescriptions for treating inflammatory diseases [25]. In Korea, PAR is a traditional herbal medicine used since the Shilla Dynasty, with widespread applications in detoxification, antipyretics, jaundice, diarrhea, inflammation, pneumonia, and cold [26]. PAR contains several alkaloids, such as berberine, palmatine, jatrorrhizine, and obacunone, and its anti-ulcer, immune-stimulatory, anti-oxidative (in vitro and in vivo), anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetes, and neuroprotective activities have recently been studied [27]. Additionally, it has been studied for skin melanin biosynthesis inhibitory activity [28] and lipolytic activity [29]. Reportedly, PAR shows antibacterial activity against oral bacteria. In particular, it demonstrated stronger antibacterial activity against the periodontal pathogenic bacteria, Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), Streptococcus spp., such as Streptococcus mitis [30]. It has also been reported that berberine, one of the active ingredients in PAR, shows antibacterial activity against oral bacteria. Particularly, it shows stronger antibacterial activity against some periodontal pathogenic bacteria, such as P. gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum), compared to other oral bacteria [31], while the use of PAR and berberine would likely inhibit the relative abundance of periodontal pathogenic bacteria in the oral microbiome and, thus, be effective for preventing periodontal disease. Based on these existing studies, PAR is being used as a toothpaste for preventing periodontal disease in Japan [32]. Although there have been numerous previous studies, there is a lack of research on the antibacterial effect of PAR on S. mutans and cytotoxicity to human keratinocytes (HaCaT), which are essential components of oral epithelial cells. Through this study, we conducted an analysis of the antibacterial activity of PAR extract and natural-product-based cytotoxicity to provide scientific evidence to prove its beneficial effects and safety in the oral environment. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the biocompatibility of PAR as an oral antibacterial agent, confirm its antibacterial effect against S. mutans (representative bacteria of dental caries), and examine HaCaT cell changes over time to the applied concentration of PAR extract for concentration-based treatments of PAR extract. Through this study, it is intended to confirm the applicability of PAR as a preventive agent for dental caries.

2. Results

2.1. Antimicrobial Effect of PAR Extract over Time

The antibacterial effect of S. mutans over time according to the concentration of PAR extract is shown in a concentration-dependent manner, as Figure 1. The growth of S. mutans was inhibited with a concentration increase, with complete inactivation at 5 mg/mL. Statistical analysis of changes in CFUs of PAR extract showed a significant difference for each concentration (p < 0.05), with an apparent inhibitory effect of S. mutans (Figure 2). After 6 h, the inhibitory effect of S. mutans according to the concentration of the PAR extract decreased from 1.25 mg/mL and 2.5 mg/mL to 5.24 log and 5.89 log, respectively, indicating 99.99% death. At 5 mg/mL of PAR extract, all bacteria were completely killed, showing a 100% antibacterial effect. After 24 h, there was a decrease from 1.25 mg/mL and 2.5 mg/mL to 6.61 log and 8.45 log, respectively, indicating 99.99% death. PAR extract at 5 mg/mL showed a complete antibacterial effect with a 100% killing of S. mutans (Table 1).

2.2. HaCaT Cell Proliferation Activity by PAR Extract

Morphological changes in HaCaT cells through PAR extract treatment of various concentrations and the SRB assay protein staining of cells resulted in a significant reduction in the number of cells and changes in cell morphology as the PAR extract concentration increased, which resulted in observable cytotoxicity associated with nucleus damage and shrinkage (Figure 3). HaCaT cells at concentrations greater than 1.25 mg/mL showed a concentration-dependent anti-proliferative effect, indicated by a lower survival with a higher growth inhibition.

2.3. Growth-Inhibitory Effect in HaCaT Cell

Quantifying the cytotoxicity by PAR extract treatment by WST-1 assay and confirming the number of surviving cells, het cell viability was 51.28%, 15.95%, and 2.54% at concentrations of 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/mL, respectively, after 6 h (p < 0.05). As shown in Figure 4, PAR extract depressed the cell viability of HaCaT cells in a dose-dependent manner. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was 12.5 mg/mL. A higher PAR extract concentration was associated with a lower survival rate of HaCaT cells exhibiting cytotoxic activity (Figure 4).

3. Discussion

As the importance of oral health has emerged due to the wearing of masks due to COVID-19, interest in managing bacteria in the mouth has increased. In addition, it was recently reported that oral diseases ranked first for three consecutive years in the 2021 Outpatient Frequent Disease Statistics of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service’s healthcare big data. Oral disease is a representative national disease that is more common than the common cold, and interest in oral health is increasing [33].
The high prevalence of dental caries indicates an urgent need to identify an effective, efficient, and non-toxic alternative treatment option. Treatment based on herbs derived from medicinal plants has great potential [34]. Although previous studies have confirmed the antibacterial effect of PAR extract [26,27,28,29], no study has reported its cytotoxicity. This study evaluated the antibacterial activity of PAR extract for S. mutans, a dental caries bacterium, and cytotoxicity using HaCaT cells.
This study showed that the growth of S. mutans was inhibited over time as the concentration of PAR extract increased, with the complete inactivation of S. mutans at 5 mg/mL. This result is similar to the research results of Kwak et al. [35], and it was reported that the higher the extraction temperature and extraction time of the PAR extract, the greater the growth inhibition effect of S. mutans. Studies show that PAR peels have antibacterial activity due to the presence of compounds, such as alkaloids, limonoids, phenolic compounds, quinic acid, lignans, and flavonoids [26,27,28,29]. Thus, the antibacterial effect of PAR extract could be related to these components. In contrast, Kim amd Jo [36] reported that PAR extract had no antibacterial effect on S. mutans and other oral strains. Therefore, there is a need for additional verification based on experimental results using multiple oral strains by varying PAR extract concentrations and clinical studies with subjects who have actual oral cavities.
Previous studies confirmed the antibacterial activity of natural substances, such as plant extracts, against S. mutans [37,38]. Magnolol and honokiol extracted from magnolia bark exhibited bactericidal and anti-biofilm activity against S. mutans [38], and some other extracts showed antibiofilm activity mainly due to the inhibition of competence-stimulating peptide (CSP) or electroporation [38]. PAR extract should exhibit a low cytotoxicity to normal oral cells to enable clinical use for their antibacterial effect against S. mutans. This study evaluated the cytotoxicity of PAR extract by examining morphological changes in HaCaT cells stained with cell proteins through an SRB assay. Drug cytotoxicity and cell proliferation for drug screening were measured by evaluating morphological changes using the SRB assay based on binding to cellular proteins [39]. HaCaT cells showed a significantly reduced concentration due to the PAR extract treatment, with significant morphological changes observed at higher concentrations. In contrast, cells treated with 1.25 mg/mL PAR extract maintained a constant shape and size, although the number of cells decreased and cell adhesion was weakened (Figure 3). These findings indicate that cell damage occurred with PAR extract treatment at a concentration of 1.25 mg/mL or higher, causing a significant decrease in the viability of HaCaT cells.
Additionally, the study used a WST-1 assay to indicate cell survival and growth. The WST-1 assay is typically used to determine the presence of live cells with mitochondria or detect cytotoxicity and cell growth. As a result, for an over 1.25 mg/mL concentration, the proliferation inhibitory effect was present in a concentration-dependent manner, implying that HaCaT cells appeared to show a higher growth inhibition and a lower chance of survival. Similarly, Jung et al. [40] found that cytotoxicity was evidenced at a concentration of 25 μg/mL, confirming the inhibition of cell proliferation. In subsequent experiments, they reported that the treatment concentration of the yellow-white fermented product was not toxic to cells at 12.5 μg/mL, which is identical to the findings of our study. This study found that 1.25 mg/mL PAR extract concentration reduced HaCaT cell density by using WST-1 assay to quantify cytotoxicity by PAR extract treatment and determining the number of viable cells; however, IC50 was not shown at this concentration, not affecting cytotoxicity and cell proliferation. Thus, 1.25 mg/mL of PAR extract for S. mutans was confirmed to be a concentration inhibiting bacterial growth with an anticariogenic effect that does not affect cell viability. Jung et al. [40] found that HaCaT cells were not toxic at a 12.5 μg/mL concentration in their evaluation of XTT cytotoxicity; this concentration used is identical to our study. Nevertheless, the authors tested this with the fermented product inoculated with the Lactobacillus plantarum CM bacteria, which differed from this study that used S. mutans.
The SRB analysis results indicated that PAR extract may affect the cell attachment and morphology of HaCaT cells in a dose-dependent manner. Similarly, PAR extract significantly reduced cell viability in a dose-dependent manner. Following treatment with PAR extract for 6 h, cell viability was significantly decreased in the HaCaT cells, as examined by the SRB and WST-1 assays (Figure 3 and Figure 4). These results show that PAR extract has a dose-dependent cytotoxicity for most oral epithelium.
A recent report by Okuda T et al. [41] confirmed the effect of PAR by culturing saliva-derived microbial communities. Their study showed a significant decrease in the relative abundance of red and orange complex bacteria, especially other periodontal pathogenic bacteria such as P. gingivalis, F. nucleatum, F. periodonticum, and Campylobacter. showae. In addition, the number of operational taxonomic units, the Shannon diversity index, and the Simpson diversity index, which represent the diversity of the microbial community, decreased as the PAR concentration increased. As such, PAR has the ability to regulate the structure of oral micro-organisms and has anti-inflammatory effects, suggesting that it can be helpful in preventing periodontal disease and dental caries.
This study has several limitations. First, our results cannot be generalized as our experiment was conducted in a controlled laboratory environment. The room temperature in the laboratory environment may not have been identical to the oral temperature. Moreover, PAR extract was in continuous contact with S. mutans in the culture medium or in vitro. In contrast, when used as a mouthwash, it would be quickly diluted and neutralized in the mouth. Additional studies are needed to elucidate the antibacterial effects of PAR extract and its potential adverse effects on the oral microflora for consideration as a mouthwash and used in vivo. Second, the anticariogenic effect of PAR was confirmed by limiting it to S. mutans among various dental-caries-causing bacteria. In future studies, various caries-causing bacteria should be identified, and not only the anticariogenic effect, but also the antibacterial effect against bacteria related to periodontal disease or other oral diseases, should be investigated. Third, the safety of the PAR extract was not secured through more diverse normal cells. In order to use it as an anticariogenic agent in dental clinical practice, safety must be sufficiently secured through various normal cells. Accordingly, it is necessary to identify various cells such as human normal oral keratinocytes, human gingival fibroblasts, and B16 F10 mouse melanoma cells used in cytotoxicity experiments to ensure safety. Lastly, after the safety of PAR is sufficiently secured, it is necessary to confirm the safety and applicability of long-term use through animal and human experiments. There is a need to prove its safe effectiveness through verification based on clinical indicators of its role as an anti-caries agent in the human oral environment.
Through this study, we found that 1.25 mg/mL of PAR extract inhibited the growth of S. mutans but did not affect cell viability. In particular, it is significant in that it evaluated not only the simple antibacterial effect of the PAR extract but also its practicality for clinical application by evaluating the cell viability of human keratinocytes (HaCaT), normal cells in the oral cavity. Therefore, we confirmed the clinical usefulness and applicability of PAR extract as an anti-caries natural substance. In the future, not only the evaluation of the antibacterial activity of PAR, but also the total polyphenolic compounds, total flavonoids, and DPPH radical scavenging activity showing antioxidant power should be confirmed. In addition, in order to identify various pathways that suppress the growth of S. mutans, more specific analysis using RNA-seq to confirm changes in gene expression will be needed. In order to apply PAR clinically, securing the sufficient stability of PAR should be given priority. Therefore, studies to confirm safety with various normal cells such as keratinocytes in gingival tissue should be conducted, and animal tests should be conducted first before clinical trials.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Phellodendron amurense Ruprecht (PAR) Extract

PAR was purchased from Hwalim Natural Drug Co., Ltd. (Busan, Republic of Korea); 70% ethanol was added to 100 g of crushed PAR, and the extraction was processed in a heating mantle at 60 °C for 12 h. Concentrated PAR was acquired using a rotary vacuum evaporator (N-1300E.V.S. EYELA Co., Tokyo Rikakikai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) after filtering it with filter paper. PAR was lyophilized using a freeze dryer (Ilshin Lab Co., Yangju, Republic of Korea) to obtain the powder. The powdered sample was stored at −20 °C after dilution.

4.2. Bacterial Strain

S. mutans (KCTC 3065/ATCC 25175) was incubated in a brain–heart infusion broth (BHI broth; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and cultivated at 37 °C for 24 h. The cultured bacteria were inoculated, each with 1 × 105 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL).

4.3. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial effect of each PAR extract was measured by preparing mixed extracts at 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/mL concentrations. An S. mutans-containing solution of 100 μL was inoculated into the medium, cultured anaerobically, and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The mixture was diluted to spread a precise amount onto a BHI agar medium. Each tube was uniformly smeared on a BHI agar plate, and then cultured at 37 °C for 6 and 24 h to check the number of CFUs.

4.4. Cell Culturing and Identifying the Patterns of Cell Growth

HaCaT cells used in this experiment were purchased from the Department of Oral Anatomy, Pusan National University School of Dentistry (Yangsan, Republic of Korea). HaCaT cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco®, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, HyClone®, Logan, UT, USA) and 1% antibiotics (penicillin/streptomycin, Gibco®). Subculture was performed every other day at 37° C and 5% CO2 conditions to maintain a monolayer of cells.
Sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay was performed on the cells [42]. HaCaT cells (1 × 104 cells/mL) were seeded onto 24-well plates, incubated in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for 24 h, diluted with PAR extracts of 0, 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/mL concentration in the DMEM medium, and cultured for 6 h. After incubation, we removed the medium and fixed the cells with 500 μL of 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 30 min at room temperature. After removing paraformaldehyde, the cells were washed multiple times with tap water and stained with 0.4% SRB (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) solution according to the standard SRB analysis protocol. After removing the SRB solution, the plate was washed with 1% acetic acid (Daejung, Seoul, Republic of Korea) to remove the SRB dye and allowed to dry completely. Finally, an optical microscope (OLYMPUS Optical Co., Melville, NY, USA) was used with 100× magnification to examine the cells and generate the images.

4.5. Cell Cytotoxicity Evaluation

The effect of PAR extract on the cell growth rate was quantified using a water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-1) analysis using EZ-Cytox Cell Viability Assay Kit reagent (DoGenBio, Suwon, Republic of Korea) mixture [32]. HaCaT cells (1 × 104) were dispensed onto a 96-well plate and cultured for 24 h. PAR extract was diluted in DMEM medium to 0, 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/mL concentrations. After culturing the treated cells for 6 h, WST-1 solution was applied to each well and placed in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for 2 h for reactions to occur. Subsequently, cell viability levels were compared by measuring absorbance at a wavelength of 450 nm using an ELISA reader (Multiskan FC, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). All experiments were conducted three times independently for the significance of the results.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical software (SPSS v.26.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to evaluate antibacterial activity and cell growth rate of each PAR extract concentration through a one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey’s test at a significance level of 0.05.

5. Conclusions

For S. mutans, the causative bacterium of dental caries, the density of HaCaT cells decreased at a 1.25 mg/mL concentration of PAR extract, with no significant changes in cell morphology; thus, the concentration used did not affect cytotoxicity and cell proliferation. Thus, PAR extract at a 1.25 mg/mL concentration exhibits an anticariogenic effect and inhibits bacterial growth without affecting cell viability for S. mutans. PAR extract, used in appropriate concentrations, shows anticariogenic potential and can be of high value as a natural biocompatible anticariogenic agent.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-H.N. and G.-C.K.; data curation, Y.-R.K. and S.-H.N.; methodology, Y.-R.K. and S.-H.N.; resources, S.-H.N. and G.-C.K.; supervision, S.-H.N. and G.-C.K.; validation, Y.-R.K., S.-H.N. and G.-C.K.; writing—original draft, S.-H.N. and Y.-R.K.; writing—review and editing, S.-H.N. and G.-C.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Korean Children’s Oral Health Survey in 2015. Available online: https://www.mohw.go.kr/react/jb/sjb030301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=03&MENU_ID=0321&CONT_SEQ=332448 (accessed on 20 March 2023).
  2. Lee, H.J.; Choi, E.K.; Park, J.B.; Han, K.D.; Oh, S. Tooth loss predicts myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, and death. J. Dent. Res. 2019, 98, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Daly, B.; Thompsell, A.; Sharpling, J.; Rooney, Y.M.; Hillman, L.; Wanyonyi, K.L.; White, S.; Gallagher, J.E. Evidence summary: The relationship between oral health and dementia. Br. Dent. J. 2018, 223, 846–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Limeback, H. Treating dental caries as an infectious disease. Applying the medical model in practice to prevent dental caries. Ont. Dent. 1996, 73, 23–25. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayres, J.S.; Trinidad, N.J.; Vance, R.E. Lethal inflammasome activation by a multidrug-resistant pathobiont upon antibiotic disruption of the microbiota. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kahashi, N.; Nyvad, B. The role of bacteria in the caries process: Ecological perspectives. J. Dent. Res. 2022, 90, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Amin, M.; Ain, N.; Mohd, A.; Sharaf, A.; Al-Hammadi, S. Organic and inorganic antibacterial approaches in combating bacterial infection for biomedical application. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2021, 118, 111382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ambarawati, I.G.A.D.; Sukrama, I.D.M.; Yasa, I.W.P.S. Deteksi Gen Gtf-B Streptococcus mutans Dalam Plak Dengan Gigi Karies Pada Siswa Di SD N 29 Dangin Puri. Intisari Sains Medis 2020, 11, 1049–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Oliveira, R.V.D.; Bonafé, F.S.S.; Spolidorio, D.M.P.; Koga-Ito, C.Y.; De Farias, A.L.; Kirker, K.R.; James, G.A.; Brighenti, F.L. Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces naeslundii interaction in dual-species biofilm. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Iwabuchi, Y.; Nakamura, T.; Kusumoto, Y.; Nakao, R.; Iwamoto, T.; Shinozuka, O.; Senpuku, H. Effects of pH on the properties of membrane vesicles including glucosyltransferase in Streptococcus mutans. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Q.; Ma, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wu, H.; Zou, J. Molecular mechanisms of inhibiting glucosyltransferases for biofilm formation in Streptococcus mutans. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2021, 13, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Y.; Breukink, E. The membrane steps of bacterial cell wall synthesis as antibiotic targets. Antibiotics 2016, 5, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lee, H.J.; Song, J.; Kim, J.N. Genetic mutations that confer fluoride resistance modify gene expression and virulence traits of Streptococcus mutans. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kawakita, E.R.H.; Ré, A.C.S.; Peixoto, M.P.G.; Ferreira, M.P.; Ricomini-Filho, A.P.; Freitas, O.; Aires, C.P. Effect of chitosan dispersion and microparticles on older Streptococcus mutans biofilms. Molecules 2019, 24, 1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Walsh, T.; Oliveira-Neto, J.M.; Moore, D. Chlorhexidine treatment for the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, 4, CD008457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Freires, I.A.; Denny, C.; Benso, B.; de Alencar, S.M.; Rosalen, P.L. Antibacterial Activity of Essential Oils and Their Isolated Constituents against Cariogenic Bacteria: A Systematic Review. Molecules 2015, 20, 7329–7358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Maltz, M.; Beighton, D. Multidisciplinary research agenda for novel antimicrobial agents for caries prevention and treatment. Adv. Dent. Res. 2012, 24, 133–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Janus, M.M.; Crielaard, W.; Zaura, E.; Keijser, B.J.; Brandt, B.W.; Krom, B.P. A novel compound to maintain a healthy oral plaque ecology in vitro. J. Oral Microbiol. 2016, 8, 3251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Saquib, S.A.; Alqahtani, N.A.; Ahmad, I.; Kader, M.A.; Al Shahrani, S.S.; Asiri, E.A. Evaluation and comparison of antibacterial efficacy of herbal extracts in combination with antibiotics on periodontal pathobionts: An in vitro microbiological study. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Suri, M.A.; Azizah, Z.; Asra, R. A review: Traditional use, phytochemical and pharmacological review of red betel leaves (Piper crocatum Ruiz & Pav). Asian J. Pharm. Res. Dev. 2021, 9, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, X.; Yin, L.; Ramage, G.; Li, B.; Tao, Y.; Zhi, Q.; Lin, H.; Zhou, Y. Assessing the impact of curcumin on dual-species biofilms formed by Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. Microbiologyopen 2019, 8, e937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Holland, T.M.; Agarwal, P.; Wang, Y.; Leurgans, S.E.; Bennett, D.A.; Booth, S.L.; Morris, M.C. Dietary flavonols and risk of Alzheimer dementia. Neurology 2020, 94, e1749–e1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Veloz, J.J.; Alvear, M.; Salazar, L.A. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity against Streptococcus mutans of individual and mixtures of the main polyphenolic compounds found in Chilean propolis. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 7602343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kole, P.L.; Jadhav, H.R.; Thakurdesai, P.; Nagappa, A.N. Cosmetics potential of herbal extracts. Nat. Prod. Radiance 2005, 4, 315–321. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yen, C.H. The Pharmacology of Chinese Herbs, 1st ed.; Chin-Yin Publishing: Taipei, Taiwan, 1999; pp. 376–377. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, S.H.; Lee, J.A.; Shin, M.R.; Lee, J.H.; Roh, S.S. The protective effect of water extract of Phellodendri Cortex in chronic reflux esophagitis-induced rats. Korea J. Herbol. 2020, 35, 25–36. [Google Scholar]
  27. Xian, Y.F.; Mao, Q.Q.; Ip, S.P.; Lin, Z.X.; Che, C.T. Comparison on the anti-inflammatory effect of Cortex Phellodendri Chinensis and Cortex Phemmodendri Amurensis in 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate-induced ear edema in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 137, 1425–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lee, J.G.; Choi, J.Y.; Oh, J.S.; Jung, H.W.; Choi, E.H.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, J.A.; Chang, T.S.; Son, J.K.; Lee, S.H. Isolation of melanin biosynthesis inhibitory compounds from the Phellodendri Cortex. Korean J. Pharmacogn. 2007, 38, 387–393. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim, K.H.; Ahn, S.C.; Lee, M.S.; Kweon, O.S.; Oh, W.K.; Kim, M.S.; Sohn, C.B.; Ahn, H.S. Adipocyte differentiation inhibitor isolated from the barks of Phellodendron amurense. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 2003, 35, 503–509. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wong, R.W.K.; Hägg, U.; Samaranayake, L.; Yuen, M.K.Z.; Seneviratne, C.J.; Kao, R. Antimicrobial activity of Chinese medicine herbs against common bacteria in oral biofilm. A pilot study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2010, 39, 599–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Rohrer, U.; Kunz, E.M.; Lenkeit, K.; Schaffner, W.; Meyer, J. Antimicrobial activity of Mahonia aquifolium and two of its alkaloids against oral bacteria. Schweiz. Monatsschrift Zahnmed. 2007, 117, 1126–1131. [Google Scholar]
  32. Okuda, T.; Jo, R.; Tsutsumi, K.; Watai, D.; Ishihara, C.; Yama, K.; Aita, Y.; Inokuchi, T.; Kimura, M.; Chikazawa, T.; et al. An in vitro study of the effects of Phellodendron bark extract and berberine chloride on periodontal pathogenic bacteria in the oral microbiome. J. Oral Biosci. 2023, 65, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jung, H.W.; Yang, J.Y.; Park, H.J. Research trend of health life expectancy using oral health indicators (2010–2020). J. Korean Soc. Sch. Community Health Educ. 2021, 22, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Farva, K.; Sattar, H.; Ullah, H.; Raziq, A.; Mehmood, M.D.; Tareen, A.K.; Sultan, I.N.; Zohra, Q.; Khan, M.W. Phenotypic Analysis, Molecular Characterization, and Antibiogram of Caries-Causing Bacteria Isolated from Dental Patients. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kwak, D.J.; Nam, S.Y.; Lee, D.S. Antibacterial activity of Phellodendri cortex on dental caries bacteria Streptococcus sanguis. J. Technol. Dent. 2002, 24, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim, E.M.; Cho, M.J. Antimicrobial activities of oral bacteria by lichen extracts. J. Korean Soc. Dent. Hyg. 2012, 12, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sakaue, Y.; Domon, H.; Oda, M.; Takenaka, S.; Kubo, M.; Fukuyama, Y.; Okiji, T.; Terao, Y. Anti-biofilm and bactericidal effects of magnolia bark-derived magnolol and honokiol on Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol. Immunol. 2016, 60, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Senpuku, H.; Mohri, S.; Mihara, M.; Arai, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Saeki, Y. Effects of 7S globulin 3 derived from the adzuki bean [Vigna angularis] on the CSP- and eDNA-dependent biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans. Arch. Oral Biol. 2019, 102, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Skehan, P.; Storeng, R.; Scudiero, D.; Monks, A.; McMahon, J.; Vistica, D.; Warren, J.T.; Bokesch, H.; Kenney, S.; Boyd, M.R. New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990, 82, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Park, K.H.; Choi, J.H.; Song, Y.S.; Kim, G.C.; Hong, J.W. Ethanol extract of asiasari radix preferentially induces apoptosis in G361 human melanoma cells by differential regulation of p53. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 19, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Lee, S.N. The antioxidant effect of rutin in human dermal fibroblasts damaged by reactive oxygen species. Korean J. Aesthet. Cosmetol. 2014, 12, 831–836. [Google Scholar]
  42. Jang, G.W.; Choi, S.I.; Han, X.; Men, X.; Kwon, H.Y.; Choi, Y.E.; Kang, N.Y.; Park, B.W.; Kim, J.J.; Gang, S.; et al. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of Phellodendron amurense extract fermented with Lactobacillus plantarum CM. J. Food Hyg. Saf. 2021, 36, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Antibacterial effect of S. mutans on BHI agar plate according to the concentration and application time of PAR extract.
Figure 1. Antibacterial effect of S. mutans on BHI agar plate according to the concentration and application time of PAR extract.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00603 g001
Figure 2. Changes and statistical analysis of CFUs of S. mutans according to concentration–time dependence of PAR extract. * The significant difference among the four groups in one-way ANOVA. Different letters (a, b, c, and d) by the presented statistically significant result of the post hoc Tukey’s test (*: p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Changes and statistical analysis of CFUs of S. mutans according to concentration–time dependence of PAR extract. * The significant difference among the four groups in one-way ANOVA. Different letters (a, b, c, and d) by the presented statistically significant result of the post hoc Tukey’s test (*: p < 0.05).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00603 g002
Figure 3. Visual evaluation through a microscope of cellular aspects through changes in HaCaT cells according to PAR extract concentration using SRB assay.
Figure 3. Visual evaluation through a microscope of cellular aspects through changes in HaCaT cells according to PAR extract concentration using SRB assay.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00603 g003
Figure 4. Ratio quantifying the survival rate of HaCaT cell growth treated with PAR extract using an ELISA reader at 450 nm wavelength. * The significant difference among the four groups in one-way ANOVA. Different letters (a, b, c, and d) by the presented statistically significant result of the post hoc Tukey’s test (*: p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Ratio quantifying the survival rate of HaCaT cell growth treated with PAR extract using an ELISA reader at 450 nm wavelength. * The significant difference among the four groups in one-way ANOVA. Different letters (a, b, c, and d) by the presented statistically significant result of the post hoc Tukey’s test (*: p < 0.05).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00603 g004
Table 1. Differences in quantitative bacterial count and growth of S. mutans according to change in concentration of PAR extract and time.
Table 1. Differences in quantitative bacterial count and growth of S. mutans according to change in concentration of PAR extract and time.
Control (S. mutans)1.25 mg/mL2.5 mg/mL5 mg/mL
After 6 h2.8 ± 0.5 × 1071.6 ± 0.2 × 1023.6 ± 0.3 × 1010.0
After 24 h1.6 ± 0.6 × 10104.0 ± 0.9 × 1075.7 ± 0.4 × 1010.0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, Y.-R.; Kim, G.-C.; Nam, S.-H. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Phellodendron Amurense Ruprecht Extract as a Natural Anti-Caries Material. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17050603

AMA Style

Kim Y-R, Kim G-C, Nam S-H. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Phellodendron Amurense Ruprecht Extract as a Natural Anti-Caries Material. Pharmaceuticals. 2024; 17(5):603. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17050603

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Yu-Rin, Gyoo-Cheon Kim, and Seoul-Hee Nam. 2024. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Phellodendron Amurense Ruprecht Extract as a Natural Anti-Caries Material" Pharmaceuticals 17, no. 5: 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17050603

APA Style

Kim, Y. -R., Kim, G. -C., & Nam, S. -H. (2024). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Phellodendron Amurense Ruprecht Extract as a Natural Anti-Caries Material. Pharmaceuticals, 17(5), 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17050603

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop