Next Article in Journal
Therapeutic Vaccines for Follicular Lymphoma: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Brain-Wide Transgene Expression in Mice by Systemic Injection of Genetically Engineered Exosomes: CAP-Exosomes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Brain Targeting and Antipsychotic Activity of Nasally Administrated Ziprasidone Lipid–Polymer Hybrid Nanocarriers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 17
Issue 3
10.3390/ph17030271
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Hydration Forms and Polymer Grades on Theophylline Controlled-Release Tablet: An Assessment and Evaluation

by
Molham Sakkal
1,
Mosab Arafat
1,
Priya Yuvaraju
2,
Rami Beiram
2,
Labeeb Ali
3,
Mohammednoor Altarawneh
3,
Abdul Razack Hajamohideen
4 and
Salahdein AbuRuz
2,5,*
1
College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Al Ain P.O. Box 64141, United Arab Emirates
2
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 17666, United Arab Emirates
3
Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Street, Al Ain P.O. Box 17666, United Arab Emirates
4
Department of Physics, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 17666, United Arab Emirates
5
Department of Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(3), 271; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17030271
Submission received: 24 January 2024 / Revised: 10 February 2024 / Accepted: 15 February 2024 / Published: 21 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmaceutical Excipients in Formulation Design and Drug Delivery)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Drug release from controlled release delivery systems is influenced by various factors, including the polymer’s grade and the drug’s hydration form. This study aimed to investigate the impact of these factors on the controlled release of theophylline (THN). This research compares the monohydrate form found in branded products with the anhydrous form in generic equivalents, each formulated with different polymer grades. Methods: Quality control assessment was conducted alongside in vitro evaluation, complemented by various analytical techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Additionally, thermal analyses using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) were employed. Results: Quality control assessments demonstrated that the generic tablets exhibited lower average weight and resistance force compared to the branded ones. In vitro tests revealed that generic tablets released contents within 120 min, compared to 720 min for the branded counterpart. Characterization using XRD and SEM identified disparities in crystallinity and particle distribution between the three samples. Additionally, the thermal analysis indicated consistent endothermic peaks across all samples, albeit with minor variations in heat flow and decomposition temperatures between the two products. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that variations in polymer grade and hydration form significantly impact THN release.

1. Introduction

The emergence of controlled-release drug delivery systems (CDDSs) indicates a significant advancement in the pharmaceutical sector, offering controlled and pre-determined medication release [1,2]. These systems are particularly beneficial for drugs like codeine [3], hydromorphone [4], and morphine [5] as they reduce the frequency of dosing, thereby improving patient adherence, reducing side effects, and enhancing drug efficacy [6]. CDDSs are vital for drugs with a narrow therapeutic index, such as theophylline (THN) [7], and lithium [8], ensuring the maintenance of therapeutic levels and optimal patient outcomes [4,9,10]. Therefore, the development of high-quality controlled-release (CR) medications is crucial in optimizing treatment efficacy and minimizing adverse effects [11,12].
Despite the aforementioned benefits of CDDS, concerns have been raised about the quality of some CR generic medications [13,14]. This has led to several recalls, including orphenadrine citrate CR tablets [13], propoxyphene CR capsules [14], fentanyl HCL CR tablets [15], and dronabinol CR capsules [16]. The reasons behind these recalls remain ambiguous for some medications. Therefore, conducting a comprehensive investigation into the underlying causes is necessary to offer pharmaceutical companies valuable recommendations. This research aimed to thoroughly investigate the reasons behind the impaired functionality of one of the generic THN products [4,17].
Several recent studies have indicated new applications for THN, including post-tuberculous lung disease [18] and COVID-19 [7]. However, THN has a well-established history of use in treating asthma [17] and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [19,20]. THN, also known as 1,3-dimethylxanthine (Figure 1), is a white, odorless, and crystalline powder with a molecular weight of 180.17 g/mol and a melting point of 270–274 °C [7]. The anhydrous form of THN displays a solubility of 8.75 mg/mL, while the monohydrate one exhibits a solubility of 2.99 mg/mL. Moreover, THN has a pKa value of 8.77 and a logP value of −0.02. According to the Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS), THN is classified as a Class I compound, characterized by its high drug solubility and permeability [21,22]. The CR dosage form is recommended for THN due to its rapid absorption, narrow therapeutic window (5 to 20 mg/mL), and short half-life (3–8 h) [20,22].
Overall, the quality of the medication is influenced by several factors: the physicochemical properties of the active ingredient, the types and proportions of excipients used, and their grades. These properties significantly impact the final product’s quality, as evidenced by various studies [24,25,26,27]. For instance, one study found that the hydrate form of cefdinir released faster than its monohydrate form [24]. Another study observed different dissolution profiles in CR matrix tablets containing acetaminophen and ibuprofen, despite similar excipients, and this was attributed to differences in the HLB values of the drugs [25].
The polymer grade is a crucial factor in the quality control and drug release profiles of pharmaceutical formulations [27,28,29,30,31]. Hartzke et al. demonstrated this in their development of 3D-printed CR tablets using various grades of hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), specifically 90 kDa, 300 kDa, 720 kDa, and 1000 kDa, showing significant variations in dissolution release profiles [28]. Similarly, research on different grades of polyethylene glycol (PEG)—PEG 4000, 6000, and 20,000—revealed an influence on the mechanical properties of formulations due to melting point differences [30]. Another study investigating hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) of various grades highlighted notable differences in mucoadhesive properties linked to the viscosity of these HPMC grades [29]. These studies collectively emphasize the complexity of addressing factors that affect the functionality of recalled controlled drug release systems.
The integration of thermal and analytical techniques, complemented by in vitro assessments, forms a comprehensive approach for identifying compromised quality and functionality in CDDSs [26,32,33,34,35,36]. Essential techniques include differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For example, in vitro assessments have shown that some hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) grades have a limited ability to sustain drug release, likely due to their lower viscosity [35]. Jannin et al. employed XRD to investigate crystallinity differences in formulations with the same drug but varying polymer grades [32]. In another study, DSC was crucial in assessing polymer compatibility with the active ingredient in CR matrix tablets for verapamil HCl, revealing substantial variations due to different polymer grades [33]. Additionally, the impact of impurities on CR medication quality was evident in a study where DSC analysis detected variations in peak temperatures and shapes, suggesting the presence of impurity [34].
This study aimed to assess the effect of varying hydration states of THN and polymer grades on drug release control in generic THN. Pure THN served as a baseline for identification, with the branded product as a reference. Hence, the monohydrate form of THN found in branded products contrasts with the anhydrous form found in generic equivalents. This research addresses the gap in understanding how different polymer grades influence drug release and formulation quality, highlighting that each of these products contains different polymer grades. A comprehensive methodology was employed, encompassing tablet quality control assessments and in vitro evaluations in both acidic pH media and distilled water. Sample characterization involved a range of thermal and analytical techniques, including DSC, TGA, XRD, and SEM.

2. Results

2.1. Quality Control Assessment

The quality control assessment of generic and branded THN products, summarized in Table 1, revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) in average weight, resistance force, and tablet diameter. The generic THN tablets had a lower average weight (394.43 ± 5.5 mg) compared to the branded product (414.2 ± 4.76 mg). In terms of resistance force, the branded THN showed a higher mean value (492 ± 2.83 N) compared to the generic version (120.83 ± 7.78 N). Nevertheless, both products conformed to USP standards for tablet friability, exhibiting less than 1% weight loss [37], and were within the acceptable USP weight variation limit of 7.5%. The generic product showed a marginally higher weight variation (0.19%) compared to the branded version.

2.2. Calibration Curve

Figure 2 presents a calibration curve that is notably precise, evidenced by its correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.9991. This demonstrates the curve’s robustness and reliability in accurately determining drug concentrations in unknown samples.

2.3. In Vitro Drug Release

Figure 3 presents a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the drug release profiles of generic and branded THN products in distilled water. The generic tablets released their contents prematurely within 120 min, in contrast to the CR over 720 min achieved by the branded product. This rapid release by the generic tablet deviates from FDA guidelines for CR medications, which stipulate no more than 30% drug release in the first 2 h [3]. Additionally, the branded product demonstrated a more delayed release compared to the generic THN profile. In acidic media (pH 1.2), significant differences in drug release patterns were also observed between the products, with the branded one exhibiting more effective control (p < 0.05). As shown in Figure 4, nearly 50% of the drug was released from the generic product after 120 min, compared to about 20% from the branded product. Figure 5 further illustrates that the release rate of the generic product varied with the media, releasing approximately 35% in acidic conditions and 95% in distilled water within the first hour, whereas the branded product maintained a consistent release rate in both media types after one hour.

2.4. Characterization Using Thermal and Analytical Techniques

2.4.1. X-ray Diffraction

The XRD analysis results, depicted in Figure 6, showed the diffraction patterns of THN, and both the branded and generic THN products. THN drug exhibited distinct, sharp peaks, particularly a prominent peak near a 2θ value of 12°, along with other peaks at 14.3°, 24.1°, and 25.5°, consistent with its crystalline structure. This corresponds with the established literature on THN characteristics. The branded and generic products also exhibited these primary peaks, yet they showed varying intensities. The order of peak intensity, from highest to lowest, was observed as follows: pure THN powder, the generic product, and finally the branded product. Additionally, the XRD patterns of both the branded and generic products revealed unique peaks that were not present in the pure THN powder.

2.4.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy

Figure 7 presents the SEM results for pure THN powder, as well as for the branded and generic products of THN. The pure THN powder exhibits a regular shape with well-defined edges; the particles are uniformly arranged with dimensions mostly less than 10 µm in width and greater than 10 µm in length, presenting rod-like structures. In contrast, SEM images of both the generic and branded products reveal irregular particle shapes and distribution.

2.4.3. Thermal Analysis

Figure 8 demonstrated the thermal profiles obtained using DSC for the pure powder of THN, the branded product of THN, and the generic product of THN. In the DSC thermogram, a consistent endothermic peak was observed across all three samples. Conversely, the pure powder of THN exhibited an endothermic peak at 272.39 °C, characterized by a (Tonset) of 269.89 °C, and an enthalpy of 153.43 J/g. In comparison, the branded THN product displayed a similar endothermic peak at 269.69 °C, with a heat absorption value of 86.036 J/g, and a (Tonset) of 265.59 °C. Similarly, the generic THN product showed an endothermic peak at 272.04 °C, accompanied by a heat absorption of 178.50 J/g, and a (Tonset) at 268.26 °C. The heat absorption was the lowest for the branded sample. The endothermic peak, representing the melting points of the three samples, showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). However, a significant difference in heat absorption was observed between the branded THN product and the other two THN samples (p < 0.05).
Additionally, a less intense endothermic peak was detected exclusively in the pure powder and the branded THN product. This peak occurred at 62.97 °C for the pure THN powder and at 59.42 °C for the branded product. Moreover, at 141.28 °C, an exothermic peak was observed in the DSC thermogram of both the pure and branded THN, a feature absents in the thermogram of the generic sample.
In terms of TGA, the results indicated nearly identical decomposition profiles for all three samples, as shown in Figure 9. The decomposition temperatures were recorded as 285 °C for the pure THN powder, 276 °C for the branded THN product, and 276.01 °C for the generic THN product. Although no significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed between the branded and generic products, a significant difference (p < 0.05) was noted between them and the pure powder. Additionally, there was a slight variation in the temperature required to achieve a 50% weight loss in the samples: approximately 315 °C for both the THN powder and the generic tablet, compared to 309 °C for the branded tablet. The main thermal events obtained using DSC and TGA for the three THN samples are presented in Table 2.

3. Discussion

This research provides comprehensive insights into the effects of various polymer grades on CDDS and their effect on the drug release profile of THN. This study also delves into the impact of different hydration states of THN on its release. Notably, it is among the first studies to extensively evaluate the influence of specific polymers, such as polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), PEG, and HEC, on the premature release of THN. Furthermore, this study delves into a relatively less explored domain, investigating the influence of varying hydration states of the active pharmaceutical ingredient on drug release dynamics. These findings highlight the importance of selecting suitable polymer grades in pharmaceutical manufacturing.
In the tablet quality assessment, the observed variation in average weight between the branded and generic THN tablets indicates potential differences in the types, ratios, and grades of excipients used in each [38]. The slightly lower weight variation in the branded THN product may suggest a more consistent manufacturing process and superior powder flowability compared to the generic versions [39,40].
The observed differences in mean resistance force between the branded and generic THN tablets could be attributed to the use of distinct PVP polymer grades. Specifically, PVP K-90 was utilized in the branded tablets, while PVP K-30 was used in the generic versions. A higher molecular weight of PVP K-90 contributes to stronger binding and enhanced cohesive properties, which in turn may lead to improved mechanical strength and hardness in the branded tablets. This aligns with findings from previous studies, where PVP K90 was shown to offer superior binding properties in paracetamol tablets compared to PVP K30 [41]. This insight into the impact of PVP polymer grades on tablet properties recommends that additional examinations be performed, such as in vitro dissolution studies.
The significant observed variations in in vitro drug release profiles between generic and branded tablets in distilled water might be attributed to several factors. A primary consideration is the use of different hydration forms of THN in the products—monohydrate in the branded and anhydrous in the generic versions—which is presumed to influence drug release patterns [42,43].
The monohydrate form of THN in the branded product is assumed to provide greater stability, primarily due to stronger intermolecular bonds formed by additional hydrogen bonding with water molecules. This can lead to reduced solubility in dissolution fluids [42,43,44]. The integration of a water molecule into the drug’s structure might also limit its exposure to the dissolution media, consequently slowing down the dissolution process [43,45]. Additionally, hydrate forms generally exhibit lower solubility than their anhydrous counterparts due to decreased Gibbs free energy [43]. These findings align with previous studies indicating that the anhydrous form of THN has higher solubility compared to the monohydrate form, which significantly affects drug release [42,44].
The variations in drug release profiles between the products might also be attributed to the use of different polymer grades. The branded product incorporated HEC 300 kDa and PEG 8 KDa, whereas the generic product used HEC 30 kDa and PEG 6 KDa. It is assumed that the differences in molecular weight of these polymer grades are a primary factor affecting the drug release variation. Polymers with higher molecular weights form larger molecular chains, leading to a denser and more extended network in drug formulations. This dense network acts as a robust barrier to drug diffusion, resulting in a slower drug release rate from the dosage form. Moreover, the higher molecular weight of the polymer correlates with increased gel viscosity upon contact with dissolution media, further retarding drug release over an extended period [28,46,47].
The results of our study are consistent with existing research. For instance, previous research has shown that using PEG 8000 instead of PEG 6000 in azithromycin formulations leads to an extended period of controlled drug release [46]. Additionally, another study indicated that ibuprofen tablets containing HEC with a molecular weight of 300 KDa exhibited prolonged drug release compared to those with HEC 90 KDa [28]. These findings highlight the significant role of polymer molecular weight in affecting drug release rates.
The dissolution behavior of the generic and branded THN products in acidic media revealed distinct release profiles. The generic product displayed a pH-dependent release, whereas the branded product showed a pH-independent release pattern. This variation is assumed to be attributed to the differing solubility of the two hydrous forms of THN. Specifically, the anhydrous THN in the generic product is more soluble in water than in acidic media, in contrast to the monohydrate THN in the branded product, which exhibits only slight solubility differences in both media. These findings align with previous research on rifampicin, where solubility variations were noted between its monohydrate and anhydrate forms in water and acidic environments [48].
The variation observed between the two products in XRD peak intensity is presumed to result from differences in the hydration forms of the drug molecules in the samples, as corroborated by previous studies, including one by Liu et al. [49]. Additionally, the appearance of new peaks in the XRD spectra of both products could be due to the inclusion of polymeric excipients in the formulations. Notably, variations in these peaks among the products suggest the use of different polymer grades [33]. This is further supported by SEM analysis, which demonstrated significant irregularities in the structure of both products [50].
The slight differences in melting points observed through DSC for the two products imply that both tablets contain the same drug molecule. Specifically, the melting points of these samples are in agreement with those identified for pure THN powder. This observation aligns with previous research findings: Devi et al. [51] and Otsuka et al. [52] reported melting points for THN at 272.6 °C and 269.7 °C, respectively.
Additionally, the observed decrease in heat flow in the branded sample could be attributed to reduced crystallinity in both the excipients and the drug, likely resulting from the efficient dispersion of the drug molecule within the carrier system. The enhancement in dispersion may be due to variations in the polymer grade. This observation is consistent with the understanding that changes in polymer characteristics can significantly affect the physical properties of drug formulations [53].
Our results align with a study conducted by Bouriche et al., in which a polylactic acid microparticle loaded with metformin was formulated. The DSC analysis of this formulation revealed a significant decrease in the heat flow, interpreted as a sign of effective drug dispersion within the polymer matrix [11]. Additionally, the higher crystallinity of the generic tablet, as indicated by TGA, is evidenced by the slightly higher temperature required to achieve a 50% weight loss compared to the branded tablet.
The presence of a distinctive endothermic peak within the 59 to 63 °C range in both the pure THN powder and the branded product is assumed to be associated with the evaporation of water molecules, considering that both the pure powder and the branded product are monohydrates. On the other hand, the absence of this peak in the generic counterpart supports the assumption that the generic product uses an anhydrous form of THN [54].

4. Material and Methods

4.1. Materials

The pure THN powder was secured from Sigma Aldrich (Merck, St. Louis, MO, USA), while both the generic and branded versions of THN were acquired from a pharmaceutical distributor.

4.2. Quality Control Assessments

4.2.1. Weight Variation Analysis of Samples

To evaluate the weight variation for the generic product of THN and the branded product of THN, a sensitive digital scale (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was utilized. For each product, the weight of 20 tablets was measured and compared to the average weight. This approach enabled the determination of whether each tablet’s weight fell within the acceptable standard deviation of 7.5%, as stipulated by USP regulations to ensure consistency and high quality in medication [55].

4.2.2. Tablet Friability Testing

The friability test was conducted to assess the durability of tablets for the generic product of THN and the branded one. This test was carried out using a friabilator TA 220 testing apparatus (Erweka GmbH, Heusenstamm, Germany), which rotates the tablets in a drum at 25 revolutions per 1 min for 4 min. Following the test, the tablets were reweighed, and the percentage of weight loss was calculated. This percentage was then compared to the maximum allowable weight loss limit of 1% specified by USP regulations [56]. A total of 20 tablets from each THN product were tested, and the results were recorded.

4.2.3. Assessment of Tablet Crushing Strength

The mean resistance force of the tablets for the two products was determined using a TBH-225 TD hardness tester (Erweka GmbH, Heusenstamm, Germany). A total of 20 tablets were randomly selected from each of the two THN products, and their mean resistance force was measured. The maximum force required to fracture the tablet was recorded in newtons (N).

4.3. Calibration Curve

A THN-branded tablet was finely crushed using a mortar and pestle. A base solution of 0.33 mg/mL was created by dissolving this powder in 100 mL of distilled water and stirring at 250 RPM for an hour, with subsequent additions of water up to a total of 900 mL to ensure complete dissolution. The solution was then diluted to obtain concentrations of 33, 16.5, 8.25, 4.12, 2.06, and 1.03125 µg/mL. UV spectrophotometry measured the absorbance for each concentration, yielding values of 1.57, 0.83, 0.41, 0.22, 0.11, and 0.06, which were plotted on a calibration curve against the concentrations. A high regression factor of 0.9991 indicated excellent linearity. This process was performed three times to confirm accuracy, with the average results documented.

4.4. In Vitro Dissolution Test

To evaluate the drug release of the THN products, a Dis 8000 dissolution apparatus (Copley Scientific, Nottingham, UK) was used with stirring speed set to 100 rpm. Following USP guidelines, the test solution comprised 0.1 N hydrochloric acid with pH adjusted to 1.2, totaling a volume of 900 mL. Additionally, distilled water was used as another incubation medium. The temperature of the incubation media was consistently maintained at 37 ± 0.5 °C throughout the experiment.
At specified intervals (60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, 480, 540, 600, 660, and 720 min), 5 mL samples were drawn from each vessel and immediately replaced with an equal volume of the corresponding incubation media. These samples were then diluted with distilled water and filtered to eliminate any particulate matter. The filtered samples were analyzed using ultraviolet spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 271 nm to determine the drug concentration. This study was carried out with three samples of each product (n = 3).
The calibration curve allowed for the accurate measurement of sample concentrations, which was used to analyze the release profiles of the generic and branded versions of THN. This was done by plotting the concentration on the x-axis and the corresponding absorbance on the y-axis.

4.5. Characterization Using Thermal and Analytical Techniques

4.5.1. X-ray Diffraction

XRD analysis was performed using an XRD 6100 system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) to determine the crystalline structures of the THN samples. The instrument scanned the 2θ angle range from 10° to 80° at a rate of 0.02 degrees per min. The obtained diffraction patterns were analyzed with specialized software to identify and compare the characteristic peaks of each product.

4.5.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy

SEM analysis was conducted using a JSM-6010PLUS/LA SEM (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) in order to investigate the microstructural characteristics of the THN samples. A small amount of the powder adhered to the sample holder using double-sided adhesive tape and then coated with a thin layer of gold using a Cressington sputter coater, enhancing contrast and minimizing charging effects. The imaging was performed under high vacuum conditions with an acceleration voltage of 20 kV.

4.5.3. Differential Scanning Calorimeter

DSC was conducted using a DSC-60 Plus instrument (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The three samples were analyzed with 3–5 mg of powder from each product after it had been transferred into sample pans for analysis. The experiment was carried out under controlled conditions, and we scanned the samples over a temperature range of 25–350 °C at a rate of 10 °C per min under a continuous nitrogen flow of 100 mL/min. Data were collected and analyzed using Lab Solutions TA 60 software. This study was carried out with three samples of each product (n = 3).

4.5.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis

TGA was conducted to measure the thermal stability of the three samples using a TGA-50 instrument (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). A precise amount of 10–15 mg of each sample was weighed and transferred into sample pans. The analysis was performed under controlled conditions, where the samples were heated over a temperature range of 0 °C to 600 °C at a rate of 15 °C per min in a nitrogen environment with a constant flow rate of 50 mL/min. The resulting data were collected and processed using the Lab Solutions TA software. This study was carried out with three samples of each product (n = 3).

4.6. Statistical Analysis

For statistical analysis, the one-way ANOVA was utilized to compare the mean values of the measured variables. A significance threshold of p < 0.05 was established to identify significant differences. This analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 26.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study has provided substantial evidence that variations in polymer grades have a significant impact on the properties and functionality of CDDS. These variations notably affect key parameters related to quality control, in vitro drug release profiles, crystallization tendencies, and thermal behaviors. This study has highlighted the pivotal role of polymer grade variations in influencing the drug release functionality of generic tablets and highlighted the importance of selecting the appropriate drug hydration form during formulation development. Further research is needed to enhance our understanding of the combined impact of different polymer grades and hydrate forms on the efficacy of CDDS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, and writing—original draft preparation by M.S.; Writing—conceptualization, review & editing, by M.A. (Mosab Arafat); Software and validation by P.Y. and M.A. (Mohammednoor Altarawneh); Resources, and visualization by R.B.; formal analysis and data curation by L.A. and A.R.H.; Supervision, resources, project administration and funding acquisition by S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Al Ain University (Abu Dhabi, UAE), under Grant Ph2021-2-902; United Arab Emirates University (Abu Dhabi, UAE) under Grant 700032854.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We extend our sincere thanks to Al Ain University and United Arab Emirates University for providing the necessary lab facilities and invaluable support for this research study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Qin, C.; Wu, M.; Xu, S.; Wang, X.; Shi, W.; Dong, Y.; Yang, L.; He, W.; Han, X.; Yin, L. Design and Optimization of Gastro-Floating Sustained-Release Tablet of Pregabalin: In vitro and in vivo Evaluation. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 545, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mosab Arafat View of Approaches to Achieve an Oral Controlled Release Drug Delivery System Using Polymers: A Recent Review|International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. Available online: https://journals.innovareacademics.in/index.php/ijpps/article/view/4568/7060 (accessed on 1 December 2023).
  3. Adepu, S.; Ramakrishna, S. Controlled Drug Delivery Systems: Current Status and Future Directions. Molecules 2021, 26, 5905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ojoe, E.; Miyauchi, E.M.; Viviani, T.C.; Consiglieri, V.O. Formulation and in vitro Evaluation of Theophylline-Eudragit® Sustained-Release Tablets. Rev. Bras. Ciências Farm. 2005, 41, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. THOMAS, J. Approach to the Management of Cancer Pain. In Essentials of Pain Medicine and Regional Anesthesia; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 525–534. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jin, G.; Ngo, H.V.; Wang, J.; Cui, J.-H.; Cao, Q.-R.; Park, C.; Jung, M.; Lee, B.-J. Design and Evaluation of in vivo Bioavailability in Beagle Dogs of Bilayer Tablet Consisting of Immediate Release Nanosuspension and Sustained Release Layers of Rebamipide. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 619, 121718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Montaño, L.; Sommer, B.; Gomez-Verjan, J.; Morales-Paoli, G.; Ramírez-Salinas, G.; Solís-Chagoyán, H.; Sanchez-Florentino, Z.; Calixto, E.; Pérez-Figueroa, G.; Carter, R.; et al. Theophylline: Old Drug in a New Light, Application in COVID-19 through Computational Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pompili, M.; Magistri, C.; Mellini, C.; Sarli, G.; Baldessarini, R.J. Comparison of Immediate and Sustained Release Formulations of Lithium Salts. Int. Rev. Psychiatry 2022, 34, 753–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Heng, P.W.S. Controlled Release Drug Delivery Systems. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2018, 23, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Coleman, C.I.; Limone, B.; Sobieraj, D.M.; Lee, S.; Roberts, M.S.; Kaur, R.; Alam, T. Dosing Frequency and Medication Adherence in Chronic Disease. J. Manag. Care Pharm. 2012, 18, 527–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bouriche, S.; Alonso-García, A.; Cárceles-Rodríguez, C.M.; Rezgui, F.; Fernández-Varón, E. An in vivo Pharmacokinetic Study of Metformin Microparticles as an Oral Sustained Release Formulation in Rabbits. BMC Vet. Res. 2021, 17, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Arafat, M.; Fahelelbom, K.; Sarfraz, M.; Bostanudin, M.; Sharif, Q.-A.; Esmaeil, A.; AL Hanbali, O.; Aburuz, S. Comparison between Branded and Generic Furosemide 40 Mg Tablets Using Thermal Gravimetric Analysis and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2020, 12, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wichitnithad, W.; Nantaphol, S.; Noppakhunsomboon, K.; Thitikornpong, W.; Rojsitthisak, P. Current Status and Prospects of Development of Analytical Methods for Determining Nitrosamine and N-Nitroso Impurities in Pharmaceuticals. Talanta 2023, 254, 124102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Larochelle, M.R.; Zhang, F.; Ross-Degnan, D.; Wharam, J.F. Rates of Opioid Dispensing and Overdose After Introduction of Abuse-Deterrent Extended-Release Oxycodone and Withdrawal of Propoxyphene. JAMA Intern. Med. 2015, 175, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Foglia, R.; Cooperman, N.; Mattern, D.; Borys, S.; Kline, A. Predictors of Intentional Fentanyl Use: Market Availability vs Consumer Demand. Int. J. Drug Policy 2021, 95, 103403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Brown, J.; Setnik, B.; Lee, K.; Cleveland, J.M.; Roland, C.L.; Wase, L.; Webster, L. Effectiveness and Safety of Morphine Sulfate Extended-Release Capsules in Patients with Chronic, Moderate-to-Severe Pain in a Primary Care Setting. J. Pain Res. 2011, 4, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wolny, D.; Gruchlik, A.; Chodurek, E.W.A.; Szara, M. Comparison of Dissolution Profiles of Theophylline Extended-Release Dosage Forms. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2012, 69, 1384–1386. [Google Scholar]
  18. Karamchand, S.; Williams, M.; Naidoo, P.; Decloedt, E.; Allwood, B. Post-Tuberculous Lung Disease: Should We Be Using Theophylline? J. Thorac. Dis. 2021, 13, 1230–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Viskin, S.; Havakuk, O.; Antzelevitch, C.; Ph, D.; Rosso, R.; Aviv, T. Theophylline: The Forgotten Antiarrhythmic Drug …. Now for Malignant Early Repolarization. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. PACE 2017, 41, 441–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Barnes, P.J. Theophylline. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 188, 901–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Barnes, P.J. Theophylline: New perspectives on an old drug. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003, 167, 813–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Arafat, M.; Sarfraz, M.; AbuRuz, S. Development and In vitro Evaluation of Controlled Release Viagra® Containing Poloxamer-188 Using Gastroplus™ PBPK Modeling Software for In vivo Predictions and Pharmacokinetic Assessments. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bucklin, M.H.; Groth, C.M. Theophylline. In Encyclopedia of Toxicology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 530–532. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bostanudin, M.F.; Salam, A.; Mahmood, A.; Arafat, M.; Kaharudin, A.N.; Sahudin, S.; Lazim, A.M.; Azfaralariff, A. Formulation and In-Vitro Characterisation of Cross-Linked Amphiphilic Guar Gum Nanocarriers for Percutaneous Delivery of Arbutin. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 12, 3918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, H.; Hardy, R.J.; Gu, X. Effect of Drug Solubility on Polymer Hydration and Drug Dissolution from Polyethylene Oxide (PEO) Matrix Tablets. AAPS PharmSciTech 2008, 9, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Arafat, M.; Sakkal, M.; Bostanudin, M.F.; Alhanbali, O.A.; Yuvaraju, P.; Beiram, R.; Sadek, B.; Akour, A.; AbuRuz, S. Enteric-Coating Film Effect on the Delayed Drug Release of Pantoprazole Gastro-Resistant Generic Tablets. F1000Research 2023, 12, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Al-Hanbali, O.A.; Hamed, R.; Arafat, M.; Bakkour, Y.; Al-Matubsi, H.; Mansour, R.; Al-Bataineh, Y.; Aldhoun, M.; Sarfraz, M.; Dardas, A.K.Y. Formulation and Evaluation of Diclofenac Controlled Release Matrix Tablets Made of HPMC and Poloxamer 188 Polymer: An Assessment on Mechanism of Drug Release. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 31, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Hartzke, D.; Pössl, A.; Schlupp, P.; Runkel, F.E. Evaluation of Hydroxyethyl Cellulose Grades as the Main Matrix Former to Produce 3D-Printed Controlled-Release Dosage Forms. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhang, Q.; Li, X.; Jasti, B.R. Role of Physicochemical Properties of Some Grades of Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose on in vitro Mucoadhesion. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 609, 121218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. D’souza, A.A.; Shegokar, R. Polyethylene Glycol (PEG): A Versatile Polymer for Pharmaceutical Applications. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2016, 13, 1257–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kamal, T.; Sarfraz, M.; Arafat, M.; Mikov, M.; Rahman, N. Cross-Linked Guar Gum and Sodium Borate Based Microspheres as Colon-Targeted Anticancer Drug Delivery Systems for 5-Fluorouracil. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 30, 2329–2336. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jannin, V.; Rosiaux, Y.; Doucet, J. Exploring the Possible Relationship between the Drug Release of Compritol®-Containing Tablets and Its Polymorph Forms Using Micro X-ray Diffraction. J. Control. Release 2015, 197, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mishra, D.; Nagpal, K.; Singh, S.; Mathur, V. Comparative Release Profile of Sustained Release Matrix Tablets of Verapamil HCl. Int. J. Pharm. Investig. 2013, 3, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Roy, H.; Brahma, C.; Nandi, S.; Parida, K. Formulation and Design of Sustained Release Matrix Tablets of Metformin Hydrochloride: Influence of Hypromellose and Polyacrylate Polymers. Int. J. Appl. Basic Med. Res. 2013, 3, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mofizur Rahman, M.; Kumar Jha, M. Evaluation of Various Grades of Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose Matrix Systems as Oral Sustained Release Drug Delivery Systems Hindbrain Estrogenreceptor View Project Effect of Careya Arborea on Obesity Induced Diabetes in Wistar Albino Rats View Project. Artic. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2011, 03, 930–938. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ritschel, W.A.; Koch, H.P.; Alcorn, G.J. In Vivo-in vitro Correlations with Sustained-Release Theophylline Preparations. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 1984, 6, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Wilson, B.; Babubhai, P.P.; Sajeev, M.S.; Jenita, J.L.; Priyadarshini, S.R.B. Sustained Release Enteric Coated Tablets of Pantoprazole: Formulation, in vitro and in Vivo Evaluation. Acta Pharm. 2013, 63, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Brady, J.; Dürig, T.; Lee, P.I.; Li, J.-X. Polymer Properties and Characterization. In Developing Solid Oral Dosage Forms; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 181–223. [Google Scholar]
  39. Asrade, B.; Tessema, E.; Tarekegn, A. In vitro comparative quality evaluation of different brands of carbamazepine tablets commercially available in Dessie town, Northeast Ethiopia. BMC Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2023, 24, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Usuda, S.; Masukawa, N.; Leong, K.H.; Okada, K.; Onuki, Y. Effects of Manufacturing Process Variables on the Tablet Weight Variation of Mini-Tablets Clarified by a Definitive Screening Design. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2021, 69, c21-00427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Njega, E.K.; Maru, S.M.; Tirop, L.J. The Binder Effect of Povidone on the Mechanical Properties of Paracetamol Containing Tablets. East Cent. Afr. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 21, 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bobrovs, R.; Seton, L.; Dempster, N. The Reluctant Polymorph: Investigation into the Effect of Self-Association on the Solvent Mediated Phase Transformation and Nucleation of Theophylline. CrystEngComm 2015, 17, 5237–5251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tian, F.; Qu, H.; Zimmermann, A.; Munk, T.; Jørgensen, A.C.; Rantanen, J. Factors Affecting Crystallization of Hydrates. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2010, 62, 1534–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jurczak, E.; Mazurek, A.H.; Szeleszczuk, Ł.; Pisklak, D.M.; Zielińska-Pisklak, M. Pharmaceutical Hydrates Analysis—Overview of Methods and Recent Advances. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shan, N.; Zaworotko, M.J. Polymorphic Crystal Forms and Cocrystals in Drug Delivery (Crystal Engineering). In Burger’s Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 187–218. [Google Scholar]
  46. Adeli, E. Preparation and Evaluation of Azithromycin Binary Solid Dispersions Using Various Polyethylene Glycols for the Improvement of the Drug Solubility and Dissolution Rate. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 52, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cantin, O.; Siepmann, F.; Danede, F.; Willart, J.F.; Karrout, Y.; Siepmann, J. PEO Hot Melt Extrudates for Controlled Drug Delivery: Importance of the Molecular Weight. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2016, 36, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Murugesan, S.; Gowramma, B.; Lakshmanan, K.; Reddy Karri, V.V.S.; Radhakrishnan, A. Oral Modified Drug Release Solid Dosage Form with Special Reference to Design; An Overview. Curr. Drug Res. Rev. 2020, 12, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhang, Y.; Huo, M.; Zhou, J.; Zou, A.; Li, W.; Yao, C.; Xie, S. DDSolver: An Add-In Program for Modeling and Comparison of Drug Dissolution Profiles. AAPS J. 2010, 12, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Samie, M.; Bashir, S.; Abbas, J.; Khan, S.; Aman, N.; Jan, H.; Muhammad, N. Design, Formulation and In-Vitro Evaluation of Sustained Release Tablet Formulations of Levosulpiride. Turk. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 15, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Baishya, H. Application of Mathematical Models in Drug Release Kinetics of Carbidopa and Levodopa ER Tablets. J. Dev. Drugs 2017, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gorajana, A.; Garg, S.; Koh, P.; Chuah, J.; Talekar, M. Formulation Development and Dissolution Rate Enhancement of Efavirenz by Solid Dispersion Systems. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 75, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Boonsiriwit, A.; Itkor, P.; Sirieawphikul, C.; Lee, Y.S. Characterization of Natural Anthocyanin Indicator Based on Cellulose Bio-Composite Film for Monitoring the Freshness of Chicken Tenderloin. Molecules 2022, 27, 2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nunes, C.; Mahendrasingam, A.; Suryanarayanan, R. Investigation of the Multi-Step Dehydration Reaction of Theophylline Monohydrate Using 2-Dimensional Powder X-ray Diffractometry. Pharm. Res. 2006, 23, 2393–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Khan, N.A.; Khan, A.; Ullah, R.; Ullah, M.; Alotaibi, A.; Ullah, R.; Haider, A. Preparation and Characterization of Hydrophilic Polymer Based Sustained-Release Matrix Tablets of a High Dose Hydrophobic Drug. Polymers 2022, 14, 1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Arafat, M.; Sakkal, M.; Yuvaraju, P.; Esmaeil, A.; Poulose, V.; Aburuz, S. Effect of Excipients on the Quality of Drug Formulation and Immediate Release of Generic Metformin HCl Tablets. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g001
Figure 1. Chemical structure of theophylline [23].
Figure 1. Chemical structure of theophylline [23].
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g001
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g002
Figure 2. Calibration curve for theophylline detection by UV–visible spectrophotometry at 272 nm (average ± standard deviation, sample size = 3).
Figure 2. Calibration curve for theophylline detection by UV–visible spectrophotometry at 272 nm (average ± standard deviation, sample size = 3).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g002
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g003
Figure 3. Comparative release profiles of branded and generic theophylline tablets and 300 mg THN in distilled water over 12 h at 37 °C (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Figure 3. Comparative release profiles of branded and generic theophylline tablets and 300 mg THN in distilled water over 12 h at 37 °C (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g003
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g004
Figure 4. Comparative release profiles of branded and generic theophylline tablets in acidic media over 12 h at 37 °C (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Figure 4. Comparative release profiles of branded and generic theophylline tablets in acidic media over 12 h at 37 °C (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g004
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g005
Figure 5. Drug release profiles at 60 min for branded and generic theophylline tablets in distilled water and acidic media (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Figure 5. Drug release profiles at 60 min for branded and generic theophylline tablets in distilled water and acidic media (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g005
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g006
Figure 6. Comparative X-ray diffraction analysis of (A) pure theophylline powder, (B) branded product of theophylline, and (C) generic product of theophylline.
Figure 6. Comparative X-ray diffraction analysis of (A) pure theophylline powder, (B) branded product of theophylline, and (C) generic product of theophylline.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g006
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g007
Figure 7. Comparative scanning electron microscopy analysis of (A) pure theophylline powder, (B) branded product of theophylline, and (C) generic product of theophylline.
Figure 7. Comparative scanning electron microscopy analysis of (A) pure theophylline powder, (B) branded product of theophylline, and (C) generic product of theophylline.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g007
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g008
Figure 8. Comparative analysis using differential scanning of THN drug powder, generic THN tablet, and branded THN tablet (n = 3).
Figure 8. Comparative analysis using differential scanning of THN drug powder, generic THN tablet, and branded THN tablet (n = 3).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g008
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g009
Figure 9. Comparative analysis using thermogravimetric analysis of THN drug powder, generic THN tablet, and branded THN tablet (n = 3).
Figure 9. Comparative analysis using thermogravimetric analysis of THN drug powder, generic THN tablet, and branded THN tablet (n = 3).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00271 g009
Table 1. Quality control assessment for the generic product of THN and branded product of THN.
Table 1. Quality control assessment for the generic product of THN and branded product of THN.
Quality Assessment ParameterThe Generic Product of THNThe Branded Product of THN
Average weight (mg)394.43 ± 5.5 *414.2 ± 4.76
Weight variation range (%)0.95 ± 0.930.76 ± 0.80
Tablet friability (%)0.17 ± 0.020.16 ± 0.001
Mean resistance force (N)120.83 ± 7.78 *492 ± 2.83
Mean tablet diameter (mm)12.03 ± 0.01 *6.02 ± 0.01
* Significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 2. Differential Scanning Calorimetry and Thermogravimetric Analysis Thermal Properties of THN Drug Powder, Generic THN Tablet, and Branded THN Tablet.
Table 2. Differential Scanning Calorimetry and Thermogravimetric Analysis Thermal Properties of THN Drug Powder, Generic THN Tablet, and Branded THN Tablet.
SampleMelting Temperature (°C)Enthalpy of
Melting (J/g)		Onset Temperature (°C)Maximum Decomposition Temperature (°C)
THN Drug Powder272.39153.43269.89285.00 *
Generic THN Tablet272.04178.50268.26276.01
Branded THN Tablet269.6986.036 *265.59276.00
* Significant difference (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sakkal, M.; Arafat, M.; Yuvaraju, P.; Beiram, R.; Ali, L.; Altarawneh, M.; Hajamohideen, A.R.; AbuRuz, S. Effect of Hydration Forms and Polymer Grades on Theophylline Controlled-Release Tablet: An Assessment and Evaluation. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17030271

AMA Style

Sakkal M, Arafat M, Yuvaraju P, Beiram R, Ali L, Altarawneh M, Hajamohideen AR, AbuRuz S. Effect of Hydration Forms and Polymer Grades on Theophylline Controlled-Release Tablet: An Assessment and Evaluation. Pharmaceuticals. 2024; 17(3):271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17030271

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sakkal, Molham, Mosab Arafat, Priya Yuvaraju, Rami Beiram, Labeeb Ali, Mohammednoor Altarawneh, Abdul Razack Hajamohideen, and Salahdein AbuRuz. 2024. "Effect of Hydration Forms and Polymer Grades on Theophylline Controlled-Release Tablet: An Assessment and Evaluation" Pharmaceuticals 17, no. 3: 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17030271

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop