Next Article in Journal
In Vitro Evaluation of Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement Composite Hydrogel Beads of Cross-Linked Gelatin-Alginate with Gentamicin-Impregnated Porous Scaffold
Previous Article in Journal
Lipase Assisted (S)-Ketoprofen Resolution from Commercially Available Racemic Mixture
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 14
Issue 10
10.3390/ph14100999
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Network Pharmacology of Red Ginseng (Part I): Effects of Ginsenoside Rg5 at Physiological and Sub-Physiological Concentrations

by
Alexander Panossian
1,*,
Sara Abdelfatah
2 and
Thomas Efferth
2,*
1
EuroPharma USA Inc., Green Bay, WI 54311, USA
2
Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, Institute of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55131 Mainz, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14(10), 999; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14100999
Submission received: 14 September 2021 / Accepted: 27 September 2021 / Published: 29 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Numerous in vitro studies on isolated cells have been conducted to uncover the molecular mechanisms of action of Panax ginseng Meyer root extracts and purified ginsenosides. However, the concentrations of ginsenosides and the extracts used in these studies were much higher than those detected in pharmacokinetic studies in humans and animals orally administered with ginseng preparations at therapeutic doses. Our study aimed to assess: (a) the effects of ginsenoside Rg5, the major “rare” ginsenoside of Red Ginseng, on gene expression in the murine neuronal cell line HT22 in a wide range of concentrations, from 10−4 to 10−18 M, and (b) the effects of differentially expressed genes on cellular and physiological functions in organismal disorders and diseases. Gene expression profiling was performed by transcriptome-wide mRNA microarray analyses in HT22 cells after treatment with ginsenoside Rg5. Ginsenoside Rg5 exhibits soft-acting effects on gene expression of neuronal cells in a wide range of physiological concentrations and strong reversal impact at high (toxic) concentration: significant up- or downregulation of expression of about 300 genes at concentrations from 10−6 M to 10−18 M, and dramatically increased both the number of differentially expressed target genes (up to 1670) and the extent of their expression (fold changes compared to unexposed cells) at a toxic concentration of 10−4 M. Network pharmacology analyses of genes’ expression profiles using ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) software showed that at low physiological concentrations, ginsenoside Rg5 has the potential to activate the biosynthesis of cholesterol and to exhibit predictable effects in senescence, neuroinflammation, apoptosis, and immune response, suggesting soft-acting, beneficial effects on organismal death, movement disorders, and cancer.

1. Introduction

The Panax ginseng Meyer root has been traditionally used in China, Korea, and Japan for thousands of years for many conditions, including the age-related decline of cognitive function, general weakness, and enhancing longevity [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. In Europe, ginseng preparations are recognized as a general tonic or adaptogen in cases of fatigue, weakness, and decreased mental and physical capacity at daily doses equivalent to 600–2000 mg of powdered herbal substance [3,4]. The results of many clinical trials suggesting the beneficial effects of ginseng on stress and cognitive functions were critically reviewed in several comprehensive and systematic review articles [3,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Overall, ginseng is a promising treatment for mental, industrial, and chronic fatigue [15,16,17,18,19], and for the cognitive enhancement performance of healthy subjects [6,19,20,21,22,23,24], and patients with mild cognitive impairments [25,26,27,28,29,30,31] and/or neurological disorders [7,26,27,28].
Numerous in vitro studies on isolated cells have been conducted to uncover the molecular mechanisms of action of ginseng extracts and isolated ginsenosides (Supplemental Table S1 in Supplement 1). However, the concentrations of ginsenosides and the extracts used in these studies [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43] were incompatibly higher than those detected in pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in humans [44,45] and animals orally administrated with ginseng preparations at the highest therapeutic doses [46,47,48,49,50,51] (Supplemental Table S2 in Supplement 1).
As an example, ginsenoside Rg5, the major ginsenoside of Red Ginseng, was tested in vitro (Supplemental Table S2 in Supplement 1) mainly in the concentration range from 20 to 100 μM, while the maximal concentration of Rg5 was 2–10 nM (about 2000-fold lower) in the blood of human subjects taking ginseng orally at a dose of 9 g [44] (Supplemental Table S2 in Supplement 1). The maximal concentration of Rg5 was only 81 nM [48] (20-3300-fold lower) in the blood of dogs after orally administered ginseng at a dose of 5 g (corresponding human dose: 39 g). These discrepancies/inconsistencies raise the question about the clinical relevance of results obtained from in vitro models (where substantially higher concentrations were used) and the pharmacological activity of ginsenosides and their metabolites in nano-molar concentrations detected in animal blood and human subjects.
To the best of our knowledge, the only in vitro study where the pharmacological activity of ginsenosides had been tested at nano-molar concentrations was the study, where in ginsenosides Rg5, Rb1, and Rc protected neurons from glutamate-induced apoptosis in vitro in Huntington’s disease (HD) assay at concentrations of 1000, 100 and 10 nM, respectively [32]. Ginsenosides Rd, Re, Rg3, Rh1, Re, Rd, Rk1, Rh4, and Rk3 were inactive or exerted toxic effects [32]. Ginsenoside Rg5 was toxic at concentrations from 78 to 104 μM in experiments with murine hippocampal HT22 cells and exhibited a neuroprotective effect in heat stress-induced apoptosis [33]. The lower concentrations have not been studied in in vitro experiments even though ginsenosides and their metabolites were detected at nano-molar concentrations in the circulating blood system of human subjects (Supplemental Table S2 in Supplement 1). Furthermore, levels of brain hormones might not be the same as those in the blood, as it has been reported for estrogens that levels in the brain were 0.08–0.19 ng/g wet weight [52].
Our study aimed to assess: (a) the effects of ginsenoside Rg5, the major “rare” ginsenoside of Red Ginseng, on gene expression in the murine neuronal cell line HT22 in a wide range of concentrations from 10−4 to 10−8 M, and (b) the effects of differentially expressed genes on cellular and physiological functions in organismal disorders and diseases.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of Ginsenoside Rg5 on Gene Expression Profiles in the Murine Hippocampal Neuronal Cell Line HT22

Table 1 and Figure 1a show that the total number of genes deregulated by ginsenoside Rg5 in a concentration range from 1 μM to 1 aM is roughly the same—370 ± 69 (RSD = 18.53%), while at a toxic concentration of 100 μM Rg5 differentially regulated 1670 genes (~4.5-fold more). A majority (73%) of these genes (1215 of 1670) were uniquely differentially regulated by Rg5 only at this toxic concentration of 100 μM.
The effect size of gene expression was in a range from 300 to 800-fold change compared to their expression in control cells unexposed to Rg5 at all tested concentrations except the highest toxic concentration of 100 μM. In the latter case, the gene expression was increasing up to 2600-fold, particularly of genes which were not deregulated at lower concentrations (Supplemental Table S3a in Supplement 2).
At the highest (toxic) concentration, Rg5 dramatically increased the fold change of many genes in a dose-response reversal manner (Figure 1b), a common phenomenon known as hormesis. That was in line with other observations, where ginsenosides, including Rg5, exhibited hormetic response in various in vitro and in vivo studies [53].
Only nine of 2897 differentially regulated genes (Supplemental Table S3 in Supplement 2), were commonly deregulated by ginsenoside Rg5 at five or more tested concentrations (Ca6, Cth, Col1a1, Dipk2a, Eif3c, Enox2, Gyg1, Tgfbr2 and 1700001F09Rik), and only two genes (Ca6 and Tgfbr2) at concentrations from 1 μM to 1 aM (Figure 1c, and Tables S3b–e,g in Supplement 2).
Only one gene, Ca6 encoding extracellular enzyme carbonic anhydrase 6, was differentially regulated in all tested concentrations (Table 1), but in a reversed manner: upregulation at the highest 100 μM concentration, and downregulation at all other concentrations of Rg5.
These observations suggest that Rg5 was pharmacologically active in a wide range of concentrations of neuronal cells from 10−6 M to 10−18 M (Figure 1c) and had a significant impact on the gene expression of hippocampal neurons.

2.2. Effect of Ginsenoside Rg5 on Signaling Canonical Pathways

In Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 the effect (−log p-value > 1.3, z-score > 2) of various concentrations of ginsenoside Rg5 on deregulated intracellular signaling canonical pathways are presented: neurotransmitters and nervous system signaling (including neuroinflammation, and CREB signaling in neurons) (Figure 2); cellular immune response, stress and injury signaling (including senescence and EIF2 signaling) (Figure 3); nuclear receptors and transcriptional regulation signaling (including estrogen receptors and sirtuin signaling) (Figure 4); apoptosis and cancer (including death receptors, PD-1 cancer immunotherapy, and tumor microenvironment signaling) canonical pathways (Figure 5).

2.2.1. Neurotransmitters and Nervous System Signaling

The Neuroinflammation Signaling Pathway

The effect of ginsenoside Rg5 in all tested concentrations (1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM, and 100 μM) on gene expression involved in the neuroinflammation signaling pathway is shown in Figure 6a.
Figure 6b,c present the predicted activation and inhibition of the pathway at concentrations of 100 μM and 1 μM Rg5, respectively. The effects of Rg5 at all other tested concentrations are included in Supplement 3 in detail.
Table 2 demonstrates some primary endpoints of the neuroinflammation signaling pathway and the number of genes matching the pathway for predicting positive (+) or negative (−) effects of Rg5 in various diseases and cellular processes associated with neuroinflammation.
It is noteworthy that Rg5 likely inhibits the neuronal damage, amyloid β clearance and plague accumulation, blood-brain barrier disruption, major depression, and reactive oxygen species production both in acto-molar (10−18 M) and micromolar (10−6 M) concentrations, and induced reversal effect in the highest toxic concentration (10−4 M).

The cAMP/CREB Signaling Pathway in Neurons

The effect of ginsenoside Rg5 in all tested concentrations (1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on gene expression involved in cAMP/CREB signaling pathway is shown in Figure 7a. Figure 7b,c present the predicted activation and inhibition of the pathway at concentrations 100 μM and 1 μM Rg5, respectively. The effects of Rg5 on CREB signaling pathway gene expression at all other tested concentrations are included in Supplement 4 in detail.

2.2.2. Cellular Immune Response, Cellular stress and Injury Signaling

Senescence

The effect of ginsenoside Rg5 at all tested concentrations (1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on gene expression involved in the senescence signaling pathway is shown in Figure 8a. Figure 8b,c present the predicted activation and inhibition of the pathway at concentrations 100 μM and 1 μM Rg5, respectively. The effects of Rg5 at all other tested concentrations are included in Supplement 5 in detail.
Table 3 shows some primary endpoints of the estrogen receptors signaling pathway and the number of genes matching the pathway for predicting positive (+) or negative (−) effects of Rg5 in cellular functions associated with senescence signaling. Importantly, Rg5 at concentrations of 10−6–10−18 M activated the cell division cycle and inhibited cellular senescence, while at the concentration of 10−4 M reverse effects are noticed.

Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor EIF2 Signaling

The effect of ginsenoside Rg5 at all tested concentrations (1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on gene expression involved in the EIF2 signaling pathway is shown in Figure 9a. Figure 9b,c present predicted activation and inhibition of the pathway at concentrations of 100 μM and 1 μM Rg5, respectively. The effects of Rg5 at all other tested concentrations are included in Supplement 6 in detail. Table 4 shows some primary endpoints of the EIF2 signaling pathway and the number of genes matching the pathway for predicting positive (+) or negative (−) effects of Rg5 in various diseases and cellular functions associated with the EIF2 signaling.
Notably, Rg5 positively regulates glucose uptake and negatively endoplasmic reticulum stress response at all low concentrations from 10−9 M, and the reversal effect at the concentration of 10−4 M.

2.2.3. Nuclear Receptors Signaling and Transcriptional Regulators Signaling

Estrogen Receptors Signaling

The effect of ginsenoside Rg5 at all tested concentrations (1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on gene expression involved in estrogen receptors signaling pathway is shown in Figure 10a. Figure 10b,c present predicted activation and inhibition of the pathway at concentrations of 100 μM and 1 μM Rg5, respectively. The effects of Rg5 at all other tested concentrations are included in Supplement 7 in detail.
Table 5 outlines some primary endpoints of the estrogen receptors signaling pathway and the number of genes matching the pathway for predicting positive (+) or negative (−) effects of Rg5 in various diseases and cellular functions associated with estrogen receptors signaling.
Notably, Rg5 is expected to increase neuroprotection and survival of cells in a wide range of concentrations from 10−9 to 10−18 M, but inhibits muscle atrophy and apoptosis at the concentrations from 10−9 to 10−15 M.

Sirtuin Signaling Pathway

The effect of ginsenoside Rg5 at all tested concentrations (1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on gene expression involved in SIRT signaling pathway is shown in Figure 11a. Figure 11b,c present the predicted activation and inhibition of the pathway at concentrations of 100 μM and 1 μM Rg5, respectively. The effects of Rg5 on SIRT signaling pathway gene expression at all other tested concentrations are included in Supplement 8 in detail.

2.2.4. Apoptosis and Cancer Signaling

Death Receptor Signaling

The effect of ginsenoside Rg5 at all tested concentrations (1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on gene expression involved in the death receptors signaling pathway is shown in Figure 12a.
Figure 12b,c present predicted activation and inhibition of the pathway at a concentration of 100 μM and 1 μM Rg5, respectively. The effects of Rg5 at all other tested concentrations are included in Supplement 9 in detail. Table 6 demonstrates some primary endpoints of the death receptors signaling pathway and the number of genes matching the pathway for predicting positive (+) or negative (−) effects of Rg5 in cellular functions associated with apoptosis.
Remarkably, Rg5 inhibits apoptosis, cell shrinkage, chromatin condensation, DNA fragmentation and activates DNA repair at all concentrations from 10−4 M to 10−18 M.

Tumor Microenvironment Pathway

The effect of ginsenoside Rg5 at all tested concentrations (1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on gene expression involved in tumor microenvironment signaling pathway is shown in Figure 13a. Figure 13b presents the predicted inhibition of the pathway at a concentration 1 μM Rg5. The effects of Rg5 at all other tested concentrations are included in Supplement 10 in detail.
Table 7 demonstrates some primary endpoints of the tumor microenvironment signaling pathway and the number of genes matching the pathway for predicting positive (+) or negative (−) effects of Rg5 in various diseases and cellular functions associated with the tumor microenvironment signaling.
Importantly, Rg5 may activate apoptosis of tumor cells, increase viability and survival of tumor cells and metastasis, whereas proliferation of tumor cells and tumor cell invasion are potentially reduced at the concentration of 10−4 M.

The Programmed Cell Death Receptor PD-1 Cancer Immunotherapy Pathway

The effect of ginsenoside Rg5 at all tested concentrations (1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on gene expression involved in the programmed cell death receptor PD−1 cancer immunotherapy signaling pathway is shown in Figure 14a.
Figure 14b illustrates the predicted activation of the PD-1 cancer immunotherapy signaling pathway, while Figure 14c,d show the effects of Rg5 at concentrations 100 μM and 1 μM, respectively. The effects of Rg5 at all other tested concentrations are included in Supplement 11 in detail. Table 8 outlines some primary endpoints of the apoptosis receptor PD-1 cancer immunotherapy signaling pathway and the number of genes matching the pathway for predicting positive (+) or negative (−) effects of Rg5 in various diseases and cellular functions associated with the PD-1 signaling
Overall, Rg5 activates the PD-1 signaling pathway at concentrations between 10−4 and 10−6 M.

2.3. Effect of Ginsenoside Rg5 on Metabolic Pathways

Figure 15 shows the effect of various concentrations of ginsenoside Rg5 on significantly (−log p-value > 1.3, z-score > 2) deregulated canonical metabolic pathways.
Some of them were observed at all tested concentrations, including the cholesterol biosynthesis metabolic super-pathway (Figure 16).

2.4. Predicted Effects of Ginsenoside Rg5

2.4.1. Molecular and Cellular Functions

Figure 17 demonstrates that Ginsenoside Rg5 can have a significant impact on some of the cellular functions only at the highest concentration. On the contrary, at low concentrations, Rg5 has no impact on some other cellular functions at the highest concentration but exhibits a significant effect in low concentrations. Rg5 has a trend to inhibit the apoptosis of neuronal cells at a wide range of concentrations with the maximal impact at the concentration of 1 pM. Figure 18 demonstrates the molecular networks of deregulated genes that contribute to the inhibition of apoptosis at the concentration of Rg5 1 pM and the reversal effect at the toxic concentration of 100 μM.

2.4.2. Physiological Functions

Ginsenoside Rg5 can have a significant impact on some of the cellular functions only at the highest concentration, Figure 19. On the contrary, at low concentrations, Rg5 has no impact on some other cellular functions at the highest concentration but exhibits a significant effect in low concentrations.

2.4.3. Diseases and Disorders

Figure 20 shows that ginsenoside Rg5 can have a significant impact on some types of cancer and movement disorders both at low and high concentrations.
Molecular networks of deregulated genes that contribute to the movement disorders and cancer at the concentration of Rg5 100 μM and 1 aM are sown in Figure 21 and Figure 22.

3. Discussion

Results of available pharmacological studies of ginsenoside Rg5 conducted in several in vitro (Supplemental Table S1 in Supplement 1) and in vivo (Supplemental Table S6 in Supplement 1) experimental animal models of neurological, inflammatory, metabolic disorders, and cancer have been recently reviewed [54]. It was concluded that ginsenoside Rg5 has the potential as an anticancer and anti-inflammatory drug, particularly in neurodegenerative diseases including mild cognitive impairments, Alzheimer’s disease, Huntington’s disease, and Parkinson’s disease.
In all of these animal studies [16,32,34,35,36,39,43,55,56,57,58], ginsenoside Rg5 was active at a dose of 10 mg/kg BW, which corresponds to a human dose of 5 g Red Ginseng dry root containing 2% Rg5 (Supplemental Table S6 in Supplement 1).
The maximal concentration of Rg5 in the blood of human subjects taking ginseng orally at a dose of 9 g was 2–10 nM [44]. Ginsenoside Rg5 protected neuronal cells from glutamate-induced apoptosis in an in vitro Huntington’s disease assay at a concentration of 1000 nM [32] and exhibited a neuroprotective effect in heat stress-induced apoptosis at concentrations of 26–52 μM in experiments with murine hippocampal neuronal HT22 cells, but was toxic at concentrations of 78–104 μM [33]. In our study, ginsenoside Rg5 was pharmacologically active both at micro-molar and nano-molar concentrations as well as in a wide/broad range of physiological sub-physiological concentrations from pico-molar (10−12 M) to act-molar (10−18 M), significantly changing the expression (in about 300−800−fold change) of almost the same number of genes (370 ± 69; RSD = 18.53%) (Table 1, Figure 1). The broad range concentration—gene expression relationships were not linear for many genes. Some of them were reversed at the toxic concentration of 100 μM (Figure 1b) if the number of Rg5 molecules was over 2 × 109 per one neuronal cell (Table 1, Figure 1).
Considering that the blood level of ginsenoside Rg5 is not steady and varies over time during absorption and clearance for 24–72 h after repeated oral administration, the target cells of various tissues, including brain tissues, are continuously exposed to different doses/concentrations of ginsenoside Rg5. In this context, the difference in gene expression profiles to varying concentrations of Rg5 and predicted effects on signaling and metabolic pathways, molecular networks, cellular, physiological functions in various concentrations of Rg5 (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15, Figure 16, Figure 17, Figure 18, Figure 19, Figure 20, Figure 21 and Figure 22) was remarkable.
Notably, relatively few genes were deregulated at several low concentrations, and only one gene, Ca6, encoding the extracellular enzyme carbonic anhydrase 6 was regulated by ginsenoside Rg5 at all tested concentrations. Rg5 down−regulated Ca6 at all low concentrations (Figure 1b), suggesting that Rg5 acted like the antihypertensive Ca6 inhibitors acetazolamide and chlorothiazide [59,60].
Most deregulated genes were specific at every single concentration (concentration-specific gene expression signatures) (Figure 6a, Figure 7a, Figure 8a, Figure 9a, Figure 10a, Figure 11a, Figure 12a, Figure 13a, Figure 14a and Figure 16). This had an impact on the expected activation or inhibition signaling (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13 and Figure 14) and metabolic (Figure 15) canonical pathways, cellular (Figure 17 and Figure 18), and physiological (Figure 19) functions, as well as organismal disorders and diseases (Figure 20, Figure 21 and Figure 22) at various concentrations.
The IPA analyses of the datasets revealed that ginsenoside Rg5 has the potential to activate the biosynthesis of cholesterol (the precursor of all steroid hormones).
Furthermore, Rg5 exhibited predictable beneficial effects in senescence, neuroinflammation, apoptosis, organismal death, movement disorders, and cancer.
Typical features of all “low dose” effects compared to the “high dose” effects were somewhat soft-acting, which was characterized by considerably fewer genes involved in regulating signaling pathways and cellular physiological functions and disorders.
At first glance, some of the results were contradictory to those observed in other studies, where significantly higher (micromolar) concentrations (Supplementary Table S1 in Supplement 1) have been applied, which have no clinical significance simply since the corresponding human doses are far beyond the traditionally used (Supplementary Tables S1 and S4 in Supplement 1). For example, it was reported that ginsenoside Rg5 inhibits NF-kB signaling in macrophages, human epidermal keratinocytes, HeLa, A549, and 293T cancer cells at the concentration 20–50 μM [38,39,40] (Table S1 in Supplement 1), but in our study ginsenoside, Rg5 induces mild upregulation (53- to103--fold) of Nfkb2 gene expression both at low and highest concentrations (10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, and 100 μM).
However, the key point is that the functional role of NF-κB in neurons is different from other cells [61,62]. In neurons, NF-κB signaling plays a role not only in neuroprotection, neurodegeneration, inflammation, and apoptosis but also in neuronal development, learning, memory, and synaptic plasticity [61,62,63]. Activation of constitutive NF-κB is involved in learning and memory processes via activation of PKA signaling molecules [62]. PKA activates P-CREB protein which leads to the release of neurotrophins in the neurons for learning and memory. The inhibition of NF-κB signaling resulted in behavior or memory deficits associated with suppression of CREB phosphorylation [64].
Activation of constituent NF−kB can also prevent the death of neurons by inducing the production of anti-apoptotic proteins such as Bcl-2, IAPs, and manganese superoxide dismutase [61,62]. On the contrary, abnormal activation of inducible NF-κB triggers pro-apoptotic, pro-inflammatory genes encoding caspases and Bax, IL-12 and IL-17, and neurotoxic glutamate and iNOS, triggering further cellular damage [62]. In this context, mild the upregulation of expression of NF-κB is an adaptive (hormetic) stress response of neuronal cells [53,61,62,63,64,65,66] to ginsenoside Rg5, which is typical for adaptogens increasing cell survival [67]. Furthermore, ginsenoside Rg5 activates CREB signaling pathway at four low concentrations (1 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 μM) that is also in line with the mechanisms discussed above and predicted beneficial effects of ginsenoside Rg5 in neurodegeneration learning and memory.
There are several limitations of this study. One of them is the lack of scientific literature about the direction of correlations between gene expression and physiological function or disease that can be used in Silico analysis for predictions related to some findings in our experiments. The second limitation is related to the number of concentrations points in the dose-response correlation study: more intermediate points in the range of 1000 fold difference will show smooth changes from point to point. Other studies where different experimental outcome measures will be used are required. Finally, clinical studies in predicted diseases in human subjects are needed.
Overall, this is the first evidence of pharmacological activity of ginsenoside Rg5 in concentrations detected in human pharmacokinetic studies.

4. Materials and Methods

All materials and methods used in the present study have been described in detail in our previously published studies [68,69]. Therefore, only a short description of mRNA microarray hybridization, and Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) is provided below.

4.1. mRNA Microarray Hybridization

Murine hippocampal neuronal HT22 cells were seeded and attached for 24 h prior to drug treatment. Cells were then treated for 24 h at various combinations and concentrations of drugs or DMSO as solvent control (0.5%). Total RNA was isolated using the InviTrap® Spin Universal RNA mini kit (250 preps; Stratec Molecular). RNA concentrations were determined using the NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, Delaware, DE, United States). The quality of total RNA was confirmed by gel analysis using the total RNA Nanochip assay on an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Only samples with RNA index values > 8.5 were selected for expression profiling. The experiments were performed in duplicate for treated samples and for control samples by the Genomics and Proteomics Core Facility at the German Cancer Research Center in Heidelberg, Germany. For mRNA microarray hybridization the Affymetrix GeneChips® with mouse Clariom S assays have been used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Data analysis was carry out by normalization of the signals using the quantile normalization algorithm without background subtraction, and differentially regulated genes were defined by calculating the standard deviation differences of a given probe in a one-by-one comparison of samples or groups. The data were further processed using Chipster software, version 4 (The Finnish IT Center for Science CSC).

4.2. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA)

Microarray data were analyzed by the Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) software, Summer release 2021 (QIAGEN Bioinformatics, Aarhus C, Denmark). Using IPA, we performed different predictive algorithmic calculations on transcriptomic datasets, resulting in varying analyses, including (i) canonical pathways, which displayed the molecules of interest within well-established signaling or metabolic pathways; and (ii) upstream analyses, which predicted the upstream regulators (any molecule that can influence the transcription or expression of another molecule) that might be activated or inhibited to explain the expression changes in test datasets.
The interpretation of gene expression data was facilitated by consideration of prior biologic knowledge. IPA software relies on the Ingenuity Knowledge Base, a frequently updated database containing biologic and chemical interactions and functional annotations with a large gathering of observations with more than 8.1 million findings manually curated from the biomedical literature or integrated from 45 third-party databases. The network contains 40,000 nodes that represent mammalian genes, molecules, and biologic functions. Nodes are linked by 1,480,000 edges representing experimentally observed cause−effect relationships that relate to gene expression, transcription, activation, molecular metabolism, and binding. Network edges are also associated with a direction (either activating or inhibiting) of the causal effect [70].
To obtain information about the impact of test samples on cellular signaling pathways and networks for biologic functions and diseases downstream of the genes, whose expression has been altered in a dataset, we used the IPA Core Analysis tool for all tested datasets. Analysis of transcriptomic data enabled us to predict regulators that are activated or inhibited based on the distinct up- and downregulation patterns of the expressed genes, and to determine which causal relationships previously reported in the literature are likely to be relevant for the biologic mechanisms underlying the data.

4.3. Statistical Analysis

Two statistical methods of analysis of gene expression data were used in Ingenuity Pathway analysis: (a) Gene-set-enrichment method, where differentially expressed genes are intersected with sets of genes that are associated with a particular biological function or pathway providing an ‘enrichment’ score [Fisher’s exact test p-value] that measures overlap of observed and predicted regulated gene sets [71,72]; (b) The method that based on previously observed cause-effect relationships related to the direction of effects reported in the literature [73,74] providing so-called z-scores assessing the match of observed and predicted up/down-regulation patterns [70]. The predicted (z-score > 2, or −log FET p-value >1.3) effects are based on changes of gene expression in the experimental samples relative to the control.

5. Conclusions

For the first time, we have demonstrated that ginsenoside Rg5 exhibits soft-acting effects in a wide range of physiological concentrations and a strong reversal impact at the highest (toxic) concentrations on gene expression of neuronal cells.
Network pharmacology analyses of genes expression profiles using IPA software showed that ginsenoside Rg5 have the potential to activate the biosynthesis of cholesterol (the precursor of all steroid hormones), and to exhibit predictable effects in neuroinflammation, senescence, apoptosis, and immune response, suggesting soft-acting, beneficial impact on organismal death, movement disorders, and cancer (carcinoma, genitourinary tumor, solid malignant tumor, and sarcoma).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ph14100999/s1, Supplementary data 1–11.

Author Contributions

S.A. contributed to the execution of experiments, data management, and manuscript preparation. T.E. contributed to the overall management of the study and manuscript preparation. A.P. contributed to the study conception, design and evaluation, data analysis, interpretation of the results, and drafting and preparation of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded in part by Europharma USA (Green Bay, WI, USA) and Botalys SA (Ath, Belgium). The sponsors of the research were Mr. Terrence Lemerond, Europharma USA Inc., USA; Botalys SA, Belgium; Paul-Evence Coppee, Botalys SA, Belgium (grant number 2019-03).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained in the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the support of Botalys SA for the supply of investigational products and their characterization. Quality control was performed by Pierre-Antoine Mariage and Sylvie Defrère, Botalys SA, Belgium. We thank the Microarray Unit of the Genomics and Proteomics Core Facility, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), for providing excellent Expression Profiling services. The authors are grateful to Reiner Kunze (Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Department of Medicine, Heidelberg University) for the generous gift of the murine neuronal cell line HT-22.

Conflicts of Interest

A.P. has an independent contractor agreement with EuroPharmaUSA Inc. All other authors declare no competing interests. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. National Pharmacopoeia Committee. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China, English ed.; National Pharmacopoeia Committee: Beijing, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization. Radix Ginseng. In WHO Monographs on Selected Medicinal Plants; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1999; Volume 1, pp. 168–182. [Google Scholar]
  3. EMA/HMPC/321232/Assessment Report on Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer, Radix; Based on Article 16d (1), Article 16f and Article 16h of Directive 2001/83/EC as Amended (Traditional Use); European Medicines Agency: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014.
  4. EMA/HMPC/321232/Community Herbal Monograph on Panax Ginseng C.A. Meyer, Radix; European Medicines Agency: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014.
  5. Lee, S.M.; Bae, B.-S.; Park, H.-W.; Ahn, N.-G.; Cho, B.-G.; Cho, Y.-L.; Kwak, Y.-S. Characterization of Korean Red Ginseng (Panax ginseng Meyer): History, preparation method, and chemical composition. J. Ginseng Res. 2015, 39, 384–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bilia, A.R.; Bergonzi, M.C. The G115 standardized ginseng extract: An example for safety, efficacy, and quality of an herbal medicine. J. Ginseng Res. 2019, 44, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hou, W.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, P.; Cui, R. Effects of Ginseng on Neurological Disorders. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Radad, K.; Gille, G.; Liu, L.; Rausch, W.-D. Use of Ginseng in Medicine with Emphasis on Neurodegenerative Disorders. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 100, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Leung, K.W.; Wong, A.S. Pharmacology of ginsenosides: A literature review. Chin. Med. 2010, 5, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lee, S.; Rhee, D.K. Effects of ginseng on stress-related depression, anxiety, and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. J. Ginseng Res. 2017, 41, 589–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Geng, J.; Dong, J.; Ni, H.; Lee, M.S.; Wu, T.; Jiang, K.; Wang, G.; Zhou, A.L.; Malouf, R. Ginseng for cognition. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010, 12, CD007769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, M.S.; Yang, E.J.; Kim, J.I.; Ernst, E. Ginseng for cognitive function in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review. J. Alzheimer Dis. 2009, 18, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Choi, J.; Kim, T.-H.; Choi, T.-Y.; Lee, M.S. Ginseng for Health Care: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials in Korean Literature. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e59978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Ong, W.-Y.; Farooqui, T.; Koh, H.-L.; Farooqui, A.A.; Ling, E.-A. Protective effects of ginseng on neurological disorders. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2015, 7, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Hallstrom, C.; Fulder, S.; Carruthers, M. Effects of Ginseng on the Performance of Nurses on Night Duty. Am. J. Chin. Med. 1978, 6, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kim, H.-G.; Cho, J.-H.; Yoo, S.-R.; Lee, J.-S.; Han, J.-M.; Lee, N.-H.; Ahn, Y.-C.; Son, C.-G. Antifatigue Effects of Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Arring, N.M.; Millstine, D.; Marks, L.A.; Nail, L.M. Ginseng as a treatment for fatigue: A systematic review. J. Altern. Comple-mentary Med. 2018, 24, 624–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kaneko, H.; Nakanishi, K. Proof of the mysterious efficacy of Ginseng: Basic and clinical trials: Clinical effects of medical gin-seng, Korean Red Ginseng: Specifically, its anti-stress action for prevention of disease. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2004, 95, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Mariage, P.-A.; Hovhannisyan, A.; Panossian, A.G. Efficacy of Panax ginseng Meyer Herbal Preparation HRG80 in Preventing and Mitigating Stress-Induced Failure of Cognitive Functions in Healthy Subjects: A Pilot, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Reay, J.L.; Kennedy, D.O.; Scholey, A.B. Effects of Panax ginseng, consumed with and without glucose, on blood glucose levels and cognitive performance during sustained ‘mentally demanding’ tasks. J. Psychopharmacol. 2006, 20, 771–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kennedy, D.O.; Scholey, A.B.; Wesnes, K.A. Dose dependent changes in cognitive performance and mood following acute administration of ginseng to healthy young volunteers. Nutr. Neurosci. 2001, 4, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kennedy, D.O.; Reay, J.L.; Scholey, A.B. Effects of 8 weeks administration of Korean Panax ginseng extract on the mood and cognitive performance of healthy individuals. J. Ginseng Res. 2007, 31, 34–43. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kennedy, D.; Scholey, A. Ginseng: Potential for the enhancement of cognitive performance and mood. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2003, 75, 687–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yeo, H.-B.; Yoon, H.-K.; Lee, H.-J.; Kang, S.-G.; Jung, K.-Y.; Kim, L. Effects of Korean Red Ginseng on Cognitive and Motor Function: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial. J. Ginseng Res. 2012, 36, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Park, K.; Jin, H.; Rhee, H.Y.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.E.; Kim, Y.O.; Kim, G.S.; Kim, S.Y.; Yim, S.V.; Choi, Y.C. A randomized, dou-ble-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of Korean Ginseng as a functional food in mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer Dement. 2013, 9, P804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, S.-T.; Chu, K.; Sim, J.-Y.; Heo, J.-H.; Kim, M. Panax Ginseng Enhances Cognitive Performance in Alzheimer Disease. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 2008, 22, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Heo, J.H.; Lee, S.T.; Chu, K.; Oh, M.J.; Park, H.J.; Shim, J.Y.; Kim, M. An open-label trial of Korean red ginseng as an adjuvant treatment for cognitive impairment in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 2008, 15, 865–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Heo, J.H.; Lee, S.T.; Oh, M.J.; Park, H.J.; Shim, J.Y.; Chu, K.; Kim, M. Improvement of cognitive deficit in Alzheimer’s disease patients by long term treatment with Korean red ginseng. J. Ginseng Res. 2011, 35, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Lemerond, T.; Panossian, A.G. Panax ginseng Meyer herbal pPreparation HRG80 for preventing and mitigating stress-induced failure of cognitive functions in healthy subjects. J. Altern. Complement. Integr. Med. 2020, 6, 100. [Google Scholar]
  30. Dimpfel, W.; Mariage, P.-A.; Panossian, A. Effects of Red and White Ginseng Preparations on Electrical Activity of the Brain in Elderly Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Three-Armed Cross-Over Study. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dimpfel, W.; Schombert, L.; Panossian, A.G. Panax ginseng preparations enhance long term potentiation in rat hippocampal slices by glutamatergic NMDA and kainate receptor mediated transmission. J. Altern. Complement. Integr. Med. 2020, 6, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wu, J.; Jeong, H.K.; Bulin, S.E.; Kwon, S.W.; Park, J.H.; Bezprozvanny, I. Ginsenosides protect striatal neurons in a cellular model of Huntington’s disease. J. Neurosci. Res. 2009, 87, 1904–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Choi, S.-Y.; Kim, K.-J.; Song, J.-H.; Lee, B.-Y. Ginsenoside Rg5 prevents apoptosis by modulating heme-oxygenase-1/nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 signaling and alters the expression of cognitive impairment-associated genes in thermal stress-exposed HT22 cells. J. Ginseng Res. 2017, 42, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cho, Y.-L.; Hur, S.-M.; Kim, J.-Y.; Lee, D.-K.; Choe, J.; Won, M.-H.; Ha, K.-S.; Jeoung, D.; Han, S.; Ryoo, S.; et al. Specific Activation of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Receptor by Ginsenoside Rg5 Promotes Angiogenesis and Vasorelaxation. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Yang, Y.-L.; Li, J.; Liu, K.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Q.; Liu, B.; Qi, L.-W. Ginsenoside Rg5 increases cardiomyocyte resistance to ischemic injury through regulation of mitochondrial hexokinase-II and dynamin-related protein. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e2625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kim, S.-J.; Kim, A.K. Anti-breast cancer activity of Fine Black ginseng (Panax ginseng Meyer) and ginsenoside Rg5. J. Ginseng Res. 2014, 39, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Liu, Y.; Fan, D. Ginsenoside Rg5 induces G2/M phase arrest, apoptosis and autophagy via regulating ROS-mediated MAPK pathways against human gastric cancer. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2019, 168, 285–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Song, L.; Yang, F.; Wang, Z.; Yang, L.; Zhou, Y. Ginsenoside Rg5 inhibits cancer cell migration by inhibiting the nuclear fac-tor-κB and erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular receptor A2 signaling pathways. Oncol. Lett. 2021, 21, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, J.-E.; Lee, W.; Yang, S.; Cho, S.-H.; Baek, M.-C.; Song, G.-Y.; Bae, J.-S. Suppressive effects of rare ginsenosides, Rk1 and Rg5, on HMGB1-mediated septic responses. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 124, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ahn, S.; Siddiqi, M.H.; Aceituno, V.C.; Simu, S.Y.; Zhang, J.; Jimenez Pere, Z.E.; Kim, Y.J.; Yang, D.C. Ginsenoside Rg5:Rk1 attenuates TNF-α/IFN-γ-induced production of thymus- and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC/CCL17) and LPS-induced NO production via downregulation of NF-κB/p38 MAPK/STAT1 signaling in human keratinocytes and mac-rophages. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2016, 52, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Park, J.Y.; Choi, P.; Kim, T.; Ko, H.; Kim, H.K.; Kang, K.S.; Ham, J. Protective effects of processed ginseng and its active gin-senosides on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity: In vitro and in vivo studies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 5964–5969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liang, L.-D.; He, T.; Du, T.-W.; Fan, Y.-G.; Chen, D.-S.; Wang, Y. Ginsenoside-Rg5 induces apoptosis and DNA damage in human cervical cancer cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014, 11, 940–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Cheng, Z.; Zhang, M.; Ling, C.; Zhu, Y.; Ren, H.; Hong, C.; Qin, J.; Liu, T.; Wang, J. Neuroprotective Effects of Ginsenosides against Cerebral Ischemia. Molecules 2019, 24, 1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Yoo, S.; Park, B.-I.; Kim, D.-H.; Lee, S.; Lee, S.-H.; Shim, W.-S.; Seo, Y.; Kang, K.; Lee, K.-T.; Yim, S.-V.; et al. Ginsenoside Absorption Rate and Extent Enhancement of Black Ginseng (CJ EnerG) over Red Ginseng in Healthy Adults. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kim, H.K. Pharmacokinetics of ginsenoside Rb1 and its metabolite compound K after oral administration of Korean Red Gin-seng extract. J. Ginseng Res. 2013, 37, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Xu, Q.F.; Fang, X.L.; Chen, D.F. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of ginsenoside Rb1 and Rg1 from Panax notoginseng in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 84, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, S.; Xu, H.-Q.; Zhang, J.; Wang, C.-X.; Liu, J.-Q.; Peng, L.-H.; Cheng, J.-L.; Liu, A. A systematic study of the dissolution and relative bioavailability of four ginsenosides in the form of ultrafine granular powder, common powder and traditional pieces of Panax quinquefolius L, in vitro and in beagles. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 185, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhou, Q.-L.; Zhu, D.-N.; Yang, Y.-F.; Xu, W.; Yang, X.-W. Simultaneous quantification of twenty-one ginsenosides and their three aglycones in rat plasma by a developed UFLC–MS/MS assay: Application to a pharmacokinetic study of red ginseng. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2017, 137, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ma, C.; Lin, Q.; Xue, Y.; Ju, Z.; Deng, G.; Liu, W.; Sun, Y.; Guan, H.; Cheng, X.; Wang, C. Pharmacokinetic studies of gin-senosides Rk1 and Rg5 in rats by UFLC-MS/MS. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2021, 3, e5108. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kim, H.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.E.; Kim, Y.S.; Ryu, C.H.; Lee, H.J.; Kim, H.M.; Jeon, H.; Won, H.J.; Lee, J.Y.; et al. Micro-/nano-sized delivery systems of ginsenosides for improved systemic bioavailability. J. Ginseng Res. 2018, 42, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Won, H.-J.; Kim, H.I.; Park, T.; Kim, H.; Jo, K.; Jeon, H.; Ha, S.J.; Hyun, J.M.; Jeong, A.; Kim, J.S.; et al. Non-clinical pharmacokinetic behavior of ginsenosides. J. Ginseng Res. 2018, 43, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rosario, E.R.; Chang, L.; Head, E.H.; Stanczyk, F.Z.; Pike, C.J. Brain levels of sex steroid hormones in men and women during normal aging and in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging. 2011, 32, 604–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Calabrese, E.J. Hormesis and ginseng: Ginseng mixtures and individual constituents commonly display hormesis dose re-sponses, especially for nNeuroprotective effects. Molecules 2020, 25, 2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, M.-Y.; Liu, F.; Gao, Y.-L.; Yin, J.-N.; Yan, W.-Q.; Liu, J.-G.; Li, H.-J. Pharmacological activities of ginsenoside Rg5 (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhu, Y.; Zhu, C.; Yang, H.; Deng, J.; Fan, D. Protective effect of ginsenoside Rg5 against kidney injury via inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activation and the MAPK signaling pathway in high-fat diet/streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 155, 104746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kim, E.-J.; Jung, I.-H.; Van Le, T.K.; Jeong, J.-J.; Kim, N.-J.; Kim, D.-H. Ginsenosides Rg5 and Rh3 protect scopolamine-induced memory deficits in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2013, 146, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Chu, S.; Gu, J.; Feng, L.; Liu, J.; Zhang, M.; Jia, X.; Liu, M.; Yao, D. Ginsenoside Rg5 improves cognitive dysfunction and be-ta-amyloid deposition in STZ-induced memory impaired rats via attenuating neuroinflammatory responses. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2014, 19, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Xiao, N.; Yang, L.-L.; Yang, Y.-L.; Liu, L.-W.; Li, J.; Liu, B.; Liu, K.; Qi, L.-W.; Li, P. Ginsenoside Rg5 Inhibits Succinate-Associated Lipolysis in Adipose Tissue and Prevents Muscle Insulin Resistance. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Farzam, K.; Abdullah, M. Acetazolamide. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  60. Kountz, D.S.; Goldman, A.; Mikhail, J.; Ezer, M. Chlorthalidone: The Forgotten Diuretic. Postgrad. Med. 2012, 124, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Mattson, M.P.; Meffert, M.K. Roles for NF-kappaB in nerve cell survival, plasticity, and disease. Cell Death Differ. 2006, 13, 852–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Stranahan, A.M.; Mattson, M.P. Recruiting adaptive cellular stress responses for successful brain ageing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 13, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Jha, N.K.; Jha, S.K.; Kar, R.; Nand, P.; Swati, K.; Goswami, V.K. Nuclear factor-kappa β as a therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2019, 150, 113–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Mattson, M.P.; Cheng, A. Neurohormetic phytochemicals: Low-dose toxins that induce adaptive neuronal stress responses. Trends Neurosci. 2006, 29, 632–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mattson, M.P.; Son, T.G.; Camandola, S. Viewpoint: Mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential of neurohormetic phy-tochemicals. Dose Response 2007, 5, 174–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mattson, M.P. Hormesis and disease resistance: Activation of cellular stress response pathways. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2008, 27, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Panossian, A.G.; Efferth, T.; Shikov, A.N.; Pozharitskaya, O.N.; Kuchta, K.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Banerjee, S.; Heinrich, M.; Wu, W.; Guo, D.; et al. Evolution of the adaptogenic concept from traditional use to medical systems: Pharmacology of stress- and aging-related diseases. Med. Res. Rev. 2020, 41, 630–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Seo, E.J.; Klauck, S.M.; Efferth, T.; Panossian, A. Adaptogens in chemobrain (Part I): Plant extracts attenuate cancer chemo-therapy-induced cognitive impairment—Transcriptome-wide microarray profiles of neuroglia cells. Phytomedicine 2019, 55, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Panossian, A.; Seo, E.-J.; Klauck, S.M.; Efferth, T. Adaptogens in chemobrain (part IV): Adaptogenic plants prevent the chemotherapeutics-induced imbalance of redox homeostasis by modulation of expression of genes encoding Nrf2-mediated signaling proteins and antioxidant, metabolizing, detoxifying enzymes in neuroglia cells. Longhua Chin. Med. 2020, 3, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Krämer, A.; Green, J.; Pollard, J., Jr.; Tugendreich, S. Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Abatangelo, L.; Maglietta, R.; Distaso, A.; D’Addabbo, A.; Creanza, T.M.; Mukherjee, S.; Ancona, N. Comparative study of gene set enrichment methods. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Ihnatova, I.; Popovici, V.; Budinska, E. A critical comparison of topology-based pathway analysis methods. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Fakhry, C.T.; Choudhary, P.; Gutteridge, A.; Sidders, B.; Chen, P.; Ziemek, D.; Zarringhalam, K. Interpreting transcriptional changes using causal graphs: New methods and their practical utility on public networks. BMC Bioinform. 2016, 17, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Chindelevitch, L.; Ziemek, D.; Enayetallah, A.; Randhawa, R.; Sidders, B.; Brockel, C.; Huang, E.S. Causal reasoning on bio-logical networks: Interpreting transcriptional changes. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1114–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) The total number of genes deregulated by ginsenoside Rg5 in concentrations ranging from 1 μM to 1 aM; (b) ginsenoside Rg5 concentration-dependent fold change expression of selected differentially regulated genes in the hippocampal neuronal cell line HT22; (c) Venn diagram of genes deregulated by ginsenoside Rg5 at concentrations 1 μM, 1 nM, 1 pM, 1 gM and 1 aM.
Figure 1. (a) The total number of genes deregulated by ginsenoside Rg5 in concentrations ranging from 1 μM to 1 aM; (b) ginsenoside Rg5 concentration-dependent fold change expression of selected differentially regulated genes in the hippocampal neuronal cell line HT22; (c) Venn diagram of genes deregulated by ginsenoside Rg5 at concentrations 1 μM, 1 nM, 1 pM, 1 gM and 1 aM.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g001
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of Rg5 in concentrations of 1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on neurotransmitters and nervous system signaling. (a) Brown color depicts predicted activation, blue color—predicted inhibition of signaling pathway; symbol shows that the activation z-score was <2. (b) Symbol shows that the −log p-value was <1.3.
Figure 2. Effect of Rg5 in concentrations of 1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on neurotransmitters and nervous system signaling. (a) Brown color depicts predicted activation, blue color—predicted inhibition of signaling pathway; symbol shows that the activation z-score was <2. (b) Symbol shows that the −log p-value was <1.3.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g002
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of Rg5 in concentrations of 1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on cellular immune response, stress and injury (including senescence and EIF2 signaling) signaling. (a) The brown color depicts predicted activation, blue color—predicted inhibition of signaling pathway; the symbol shows that the activation z-score was <2. (b) the symbol shows that the −log p-value was <1.3.
Figure 3. Effect of Rg5 in concentrations of 1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on cellular immune response, stress and injury (including senescence and EIF2 signaling) signaling. (a) The brown color depicts predicted activation, blue color—predicted inhibition of signaling pathway; the symbol shows that the activation z-score was <2. (b) the symbol shows that the −log p-value was <1.3.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g003
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g004 550
Figure 4. Effect of Rg5 in concentrations of 1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on nuclear receptors and transcriptional regulation (including estrogen receptors and sirtuin) signaling. (a) The brown color depicts predicted activation, blue color—predicted inhibition of signaling pathway; the symbol shows that the activation z-score was <2. (b) The symbol shows that the −log p-value was <1.3.
Figure 4. Effect of Rg5 in concentrations of 1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on nuclear receptors and transcriptional regulation (including estrogen receptors and sirtuin) signaling. (a) The brown color depicts predicted activation, blue color—predicted inhibition of signaling pathway; the symbol shows that the activation z-score was <2. (b) The symbol shows that the −log p-value was <1.3.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g004
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of Rg5 in concentrations of 1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on apoptosis and cancer (including death receptor signaling, programmed death PD-1 cancer immunotherapy and tumor microenvironment) canonical pathways. (a) Brown color depicts predicted activation, blue color—predicted inhibition of signaling pathway; symbol shows that the activation z-score was <2. (b) Symbol shows that the −log p-value was <1.3.
Figure 5. Effect of Rg5 in concentrations of 1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on apoptosis and cancer (including death receptor signaling, programmed death PD-1 cancer immunotherapy and tumor microenvironment) canonical pathways. (a) Brown color depicts predicted activation, blue color—predicted inhibition of signaling pathway; symbol shows that the activation z-score was <2. (b) Symbol shows that the −log p-value was <1.3.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g005
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g006 550
Figure 6. Effect of Rg5 on neuroinflammation signaling pathway: (a) Heatmap of gene expression (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 at different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) Rg5 in the concentration of 100 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown); (c) Rg5 at a concentration of 1 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Figure 6. Effect of Rg5 on neuroinflammation signaling pathway: (a) Heatmap of gene expression (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 at different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) Rg5 in the concentration of 100 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown); (c) Rg5 at a concentration of 1 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g006
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g007 550
Figure 7. Effect of Rg5 on CREB signaling pathway: (a) Heatmap of gene expressions (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 at different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) Rg5 at a concentration of 100 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown); (c) Rg5 at a concentration of 1 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Figure 7. Effect of Rg5 on CREB signaling pathway: (a) Heatmap of gene expressions (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 at different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) Rg5 at a concentration of 100 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown); (c) Rg5 at a concentration of 1 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g007
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g008 550
Figure 8. Effect of Rg5 on senescence signaling pathway: (a) Heatmap of gene expression (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 at different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) Rg5 at a concentration of 100 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown); (c) Rg5 at a concentration of 1 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Figure 8. Effect of Rg5 on senescence signaling pathway: (a) Heatmap of gene expression (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 at different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) Rg5 at a concentration of 100 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown); (c) Rg5 at a concentration of 1 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g008
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g009 550
Figure 9. Effect of Rg5 on EIF2 signaling pathway: (a) Heatmap of gene expression (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 in different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) Rg5 at a concentration of 100 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown); (c) Rg5 at a concentration of 1 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Figure 9. Effect of Rg5 on EIF2 signaling pathway: (a) Heatmap of gene expression (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 in different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) Rg5 at a concentration of 100 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown); (c) Rg5 at a concentration of 1 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g009
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g010 550
Figure 10. Effect of Rg5 on estrogen receptors signaling pathway: (a) Heatmap of gene expression (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 at different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) Rg5 in the concentration of 100 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown); (c) Rg5 in the concentration of 1 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Figure 10. Effect of Rg5 on estrogen receptors signaling pathway: (a) Heatmap of gene expression (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 at different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) Rg5 in the concentration of 100 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown); (c) Rg5 in the concentration of 1 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g010
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g011 550
Figure 11. Effect of Rg5 on SIRT signaling pathway in neurons: (a)—Heatmap of gene expressions (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green—downregulation), after exposure of neurons with ginsenoside Rg5 in different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or down-regulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) Rg5 in the concentration of 100 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown); (c) Rg5 in the concentration of 1 nM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Figure 11. Effect of Rg5 on SIRT signaling pathway in neurons: (a)—Heatmap of gene expressions (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green—downregulation), after exposure of neurons with ginsenoside Rg5 in different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or down-regulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) Rg5 in the concentration of 100 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown); (c) Rg5 in the concentration of 1 nM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g011
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g012 550
Figure 12. Effect of Rg5 on death receptors signaling pathway: (a) Heatmap of gene expression (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 at different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) Rg5 at a concentration of 100 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown); (c) Rg5 at a concentration of 1 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Figure 12. Effect of Rg5 on death receptors signaling pathway: (a) Heatmap of gene expression (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 at different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) Rg5 at a concentration of 100 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown); (c) Rg5 at a concentration of 1 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g012
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g013 550
Figure 13. Effect of Rg5 on tumor microenvironment signaling pathway: (a) Heatmap of gene expression (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 in different concentrations; the 100 mM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) Rg5 at a concentration of 1 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Figure 13. Effect of Rg5 on tumor microenvironment signaling pathway: (a) Heatmap of gene expression (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 in different concentrations; the 100 mM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) Rg5 at a concentration of 1 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g013
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g014 550
Figure 14. Effect of Rg5 on PD-1 cancer immunotherapy signaling pathway: (a) Heatmap of gene expression (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 at different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) canonical pathway activation state; (c) Rg5 at a concentration of 100 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown); (d) Rg5 at a concentration of 1 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Figure 14. Effect of Rg5 on PD-1 cancer immunotherapy signaling pathway: (a) Heatmap of gene expression (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 at different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes; (b) canonical pathway activation state; (c) Rg5 at a concentration of 100 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown); (d) Rg5 at a concentration of 1 μM—predicted inhibition (blue) and activation (brown).
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g014
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g015 550
Figure 15. Effect of Rg5 at concentrations of 1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on significantly deregulated metabolic signaling pathways. (a) The brown color shows the predicted activation, blue color—predicted inhibition of signaling pathway; the symbol shows that the activation z-score was <2. (b) the symbol shows that the −log p−value was <1.3.
Figure 15. Effect of Rg5 at concentrations of 1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on significantly deregulated metabolic signaling pathways. (a) The brown color shows the predicted activation, blue color—predicted inhibition of signaling pathway; the symbol shows that the activation z-score was <2. (b) the symbol shows that the −log p−value was <1.3.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g015
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g016 550
Figure 16. Effect of Rg5 on cholesterol biosynthesis metabolic pathway: Heatmap of gene expression (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 at different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes.
Figure 16. Effect of Rg5 on cholesterol biosynthesis metabolic pathway: Heatmap of gene expression (in fold changes compared to control, red, upregulation and green, downregulation), after exposure with ginsenoside Rg5 at different concentrations; the 100 μM signature is shown in the leftmost column as solid red or green squares indicating genes that are upregulated or downregulated, respectively; color intensity indicates the actual log-fold changes.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g016
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g017 550
Figure 17. Effect of Rg5 at concentrations of 1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on molecular and cellular functions (including apoptosis of neurons). (a) the brown color shows the predicted activation, blue color the predicted inhibition of signaling pathway; the symbol shows that the activation z-score was <2. (b) the symbol shows that the −log p−value was <1.3.
Figure 17. Effect of Rg5 at concentrations of 1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on molecular and cellular functions (including apoptosis of neurons). (a) the brown color shows the predicted activation, blue color the predicted inhibition of signaling pathway; the symbol shows that the activation z-score was <2. (b) the symbol shows that the −log p−value was <1.3.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g017
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g018 550
Figure 18. Predicted effects of Rg5 on apoptosis: (a) activation (brown) at a concentration of 100 μM; (b)—predicted inhibition (blue) at a concentration of 1 pM.
Figure 18. Predicted effects of Rg5 on apoptosis: (a) activation (brown) at a concentration of 100 μM; (b)—predicted inhibition (blue) at a concentration of 1 pM.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g018
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g019 550
Figure 19. Effect of Rg5 at concentrations of 1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on physiological functions, including organismal death. (a) The brown color shows the predicted activation, blue color the predicted inhibition of signaling pathway; the symbol shows that the activation z-score was <2. (b) The symbol shows that the −log p-value was <1.3.
Figure 19. Effect of Rg5 at concentrations of 1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 1 μM and 100 μM) on physiological functions, including organismal death. (a) The brown color shows the predicted activation, blue color the predicted inhibition of signaling pathway; the symbol shows that the activation z-score was <2. (b) The symbol shows that the −log p-value was <1.3.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g019
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g020 550
Figure 20. Effect of Rg5 at concentrations of 1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 100 nM *, 1 μM and 100 μM) on diseases and disorders, including movement disorders. (a) The brown color shows the predicted activation, blue color the predicted inhibition of signaling pathway; the symbol shows that the activation z-score was <2. (b) the symbol shows that the −log p-value was <1.3. *: Results from Network Pharmacology of Red Ginseng (Part II).
Figure 20. Effect of Rg5 at concentrations of 1 aM, 10 aM, 1 fM, 1 pM, 1 nM, 100 nM *, 1 μM and 100 μM) on diseases and disorders, including movement disorders. (a) The brown color shows the predicted activation, blue color the predicted inhibition of signaling pathway; the symbol shows that the activation z-score was <2. (b) the symbol shows that the −log p-value was <1.3. *: Results from Network Pharmacology of Red Ginseng (Part II).
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g020
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g021 550
Figure 21. Predicted effects of Rg5 on movement disorders: (a) activation (brown) at a concentration of 100 μM; (b) predicted inhibition (blue) at a concentration of 1 aM.
Figure 21. Predicted effects of Rg5 on movement disorders: (a) activation (brown) at a concentration of 100 μM; (b) predicted inhibition (blue) at a concentration of 1 aM.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g021
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g022 550
Figure 22. Predicted effects of Rg5 in cancer: predicted inhibition (blue) at the concentration of 100 nM. *: Results from Network Pharmacology of Red Ginseng (Part II).
Figure 22. Predicted effects of Rg5 in cancer: predicted inhibition (blue) at the concentration of 100 nM. *: Results from Network Pharmacology of Red Ginseng (Part II).
Pharmaceuticals 14 00999 g022
Table
Table 1. Number of genes deregulated1 by ginsenoside Rg5 in different concentrations in the murine hippocampal neuronal cell line HT22. For details, see Supplemental Table S3 in Supplement 2.
Table 1. Number of genes deregulated1 by ginsenoside Rg5 in different concentrations in the murine hippocampal neuronal cell line HT22. For details, see Supplemental Table S3 in Supplement 2.
Sample NameRg5 ConcentrationMolecules of Rg5 per Cells,
Ratio		Number of Deregulated GenesNumber of Deregulated Genes Unique
Only in Selected Conc.		Fold Changes of the Only Gene, Ca6, Which is Deregulated in All Conc.
S210−4 M1 2 × 101116701215731
S310−6 M1 2 × 109280120−306
S410−9 M1 2 × 106328122−286
S510−12 M1 2 × 103380163−274
S610−15 M1 2471252−281
S710−17 M2:102343159−293
S810−18 M2:103422178−313
1 >20-fold compared to control.
Table
Table 2. The number of genes matching neuroinflammation signaling pathway and predicted effects of Rg5 in various diseases and cellular processes associated with neuroinflammation 1.
Table 2. The number of genes matching neuroinflammation signaling pathway and predicted effects of Rg5 in various diseases and cellular processes associated with neuroinflammation 1.
Concentration of Rg5, M 10−410−610−910−1210−1510−1710−18
No. of matching genes 23526548
Amyloid-β plaque accumulationdisease+0−−0+−
Astrogliosisdisease+−++++−
Aβ formation/generationdisease+−+++++
Blood-brain barrier disruptiondisease+−+/−+++−
Major depressiondisease+−++++−
Oxidative stressdisease+−−+−+−
Neuron’s damagedisease+−++++−
Neuron’s survivalprocess−−+++++
Neuron’s apoptosisprocess+0−− ++++ −
Th1 cell recruitmentprocess−+−−−−+
T cell recruitmentprocess+0−+++−
GABAergic neuron densityprocess+−++++−
Amyloid-β precursor proteinprotein+0−−0+−
1 0—no effect; (+)—activation, (−)—inhibition compared to control.
Table
Table 3. The number of genes matching senescence signaling pathway and predicted effects of Rg5 in cellular processes associated with neurotransmission 1.
Table 3. The number of genes matching senescence signaling pathway and predicted effects of Rg5 in cellular processes associated with neurotransmission 1.
Concentration of Rg5, M 10−410−610−910−1210−1510−1710−18
No. of matching genes 431058938
Cell division cyclefunction−++++++
Cellular senescencefunction+−−−−−−
1 0—no effect; (+)—activation, (−)—inhibition compared to control.
Table
Table 4. The number of genes matching EIF2 signaling pathway and predicted effects of Rg5 in various diseases and cellular functions associated with intracellular signaling 1.
Table 4. The number of genes matching EIF2 signaling pathway and predicted effects of Rg5 in various diseases and cellular functions associated with intracellular signaling 1.
Concentration of Rg5, M 10−410−610−910−1210−1510−1710−18
No. of matching genes 32385989
Cardio-protectiondisease+0−−−−−
ER stress responsefunction+0−−−−−
Uptake of D-glucosefunction−0+++++
Vascularizationfunction−0−−00+
Assembly of stress granulefunction−0−−00−
Translation/protein elongationfunction−−−−+−−
1 0—no effect; (+)—activation, (−)—inhibition compared to control.
Table
Table 5. The number of genes matching estrogen receptors signaling pathway and predicted effects of Rg5 in various diseases and cellular functions associated with neurotransmission 1.
Table 5. The number of genes matching estrogen receptors signaling pathway and predicted effects of Rg5 in various diseases and cellular functions associated with neurotransmission 1.
Concentration of Rg5, M 10−410−610−910−1210−1510−1710−18
No. of matching genes 56513810111
Atrophy of muscledisease++−−−0+
Breast cancer cell line tumorigenesisdisease0−+0−0+
Metastasisdisease+0−0−00
Oxidative stressdisease+00000+
Tumor cell proliferationdisease0−+0−0+0
Angiogenesisfunction0−++−0+
Apoptosisfunction++−−−0+
Cell proliferationfunction−−+0−0+
Coronary vessel relaxationfunction−0−+00+
Neuroprotectionfunction+−+++++
Survival of cellsfunction+−++++0
Synapse maturationfunction−++−−0+
1 0—no effect; (+)—activation, (−)—inhibition compared to control.
Table
Table 6. The number of genes matching senescence signaling pathway and predicted effects of Rg5 in cellular processes associated with apoptosis 1.
Table 6. The number of genes matching senescence signaling pathway and predicted effects of Rg5 in cellular processes associated with apoptosis 1.
Concentration of Rg5, M 10−410−610−910−1210−1510−1710−18
No. of matching genes 8005522
Apoptosisfunction−00−−−−
Cell shrinkagefunction−00−−−+
Chromatin condensationfunction−00−−−−
DNA fragmentationfunction−00−−−−
DNA repairfunction+00++++
1 0—no effect; (+)—activation, (−)—inhibition compared to control.
Table
Table 7. The number of genes matching tumor microenvironment signaling pathway and predicted effects of Rg5 in various diseases and cellular processes associated with neurotransmission 1.
Table 7. The number of genes matching tumor microenvironment signaling pathway and predicted effects of Rg5 in various diseases and cellular processes associated with neurotransmission 1.
Concentration of Rg5, M 10−410−610−910−1210−1510−1710−18
No. of matching genes 29524745
Apoptosis of tumor cellsDisease− +++0− −− −− +− +
Viability of tumor cellsfunction+−0++++
Survival of tumor cellsdisease+−0++++
Proliferation of tumor cellsdisease−−0++++
Metastasisdisease+−0++++
Tumor cell invasiondisease−−0++++
1 0—no effect; (+)—activation, (−)—inhibition compared to control.
Table
Table 8. The number of genes matching apoptosis receptor PD−1 cancer immunotherapy signaling pathway and predicted effects of Rg5 in various diseases and cellular processes associated with cancer immunotherapy 1.
Table 8. The number of genes matching apoptosis receptor PD−1 cancer immunotherapy signaling pathway and predicted effects of Rg5 in various diseases and cellular processes associated with cancer immunotherapy 1.
Concentration Rg5, M 10−410−610−910−1210−1510−1710−18
No. of matching genes 9412613
Cancer cell proliferationdisease+−−0+++
T-cell exhaustiondisease++0−−0+
Effector function of T cellsfunction−−0++0−
T-cell apoptosisfunction−+00−−+
T-cell proliferationfunction−−0++00
T-cell activationfunction−−0++0−
Tr1 cell specializationfunction++0−−0+
1 0—no effect; (+)—activation, (−)—inhibition compared to control.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Panossian, A.; Abdelfatah, S.; Efferth, T. Network Pharmacology of Red Ginseng (Part I): Effects of Ginsenoside Rg5 at Physiological and Sub-Physiological Concentrations. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 999. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14100999

AMA Style

Panossian A, Abdelfatah S, Efferth T. Network Pharmacology of Red Ginseng (Part I): Effects of Ginsenoside Rg5 at Physiological and Sub-Physiological Concentrations. Pharmaceuticals. 2021; 14(10):999. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14100999

Chicago/Turabian Style

Panossian, Alexander, Sara Abdelfatah, and Thomas Efferth. 2021. "Network Pharmacology of Red Ginseng (Part I): Effects of Ginsenoside Rg5 at Physiological and Sub-Physiological Concentrations" Pharmaceuticals 14, no. 10: 999. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14100999

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop