Next Article in Journal
Endogenous Retroviruses in Nervous System Disorders
Next Article in Special Issue
Mapping of Absolute Host Concentration and Exchange Kinetics of Xenon Hyper-CEST MRI Agents
Previous Article in Journal
Drug–Drug Interactions and Pharmacogenomic Evaluation in Colorectal Cancer Patients: The New Drug-PIN® System Comprehensive Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Repurposing Clinical Agents for Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Current Status and Future Perspectives
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 14
Issue 1
10.3390/ph14010069
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Activatable Nanoparticles: Recent Advances in Redox-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Contrast Agent Candidates Capable of Detecting Inflammation

by
Chukwuazam Nwasike
1,
Erin Purr
1,
Eunsoo Yoo
2,
Jaspreet Singh Nagi
3 and
Amber L. Doiron
3,*
1
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, NY 13902, USA
2
Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
3
Department of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14(1), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14010069
Submission received: 31 December 2020 / Revised: 14 January 2021 / Accepted: 14 January 2021 / Published: 16 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Next Generation of MRI Agents)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The emergence of activatable magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agents has prompted significant interest in the detection of functional markers of diseases, resulting in the creation of a plethora of nanoprobes capable of detecting these biomarkers. These markers are commonly dysregulated in several chronic diseases, specifically select cancers and inflammatory diseases. Recently, the development of redox-sensitive nanoparticle-based contrast agents has gained momentum given advances in medicine linking several inflammatory diseases to redox imbalance. Researchers have pinpointed redox dysregulation as an opportunity to use activatable MR contrast agents to detect and stage several diseases as well as monitor the treatment of inflammatory diseases or conditions. These new classes of agents represent an advancement in the field of MR imaging as they elicit a response to stimuli, creating contrast while providing evidence of biomarker changes and commensurate disease state. Most redox-sensitive nanoparticle-based contrast agents are sensitive to reductive glutathione or oxidative reactive oxygen species. In this review, we will explore recent investigations into redox-activatable, nanoparticle-based MR contrast agent candidates.

1. Introduction

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is one of the most powerful diagnostic tools available in clinical use [1,2,3,4]. Almost a third of all MR scans are performed using an MR contrast agent, which can be administered orally, intravenously, or through inhalation in order to enhance resulting diagnostic images [2,5,6,7]. These agents can alter the magnetic moment of 1H in a local tissue microenvironment to either increase or decrease the MR signal on images, depending on the contrast agent used and the imaging parameters [8,9,10]. Amongst several classes of agents, nanoparticle-based contrast agents have been investigated extensively due to several unique advantages [11]. One of these advantages is the ability of nanoparticles to accumulate in tumor sites via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect [12,13,14]. Additionally, the large surface area of nanoparticles allows for increased reactivity and provides room for functionalization with specific moieties to improve the targeting of disease sites or introduce other functionalities [11]. Nanoparticle-based contrast agents are generally classified as either T1 or T2 agents, depending on whether they have a stronger effect on longitudinal (T1) or transverse (T2) relaxation [15,16,17]. Another class of agents, known as chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST), is emerging as an MR contrast approach capable of significantly improving diagnostic MR [18,19]. These relatively new CEST-based agents work by exchanging their presaturated exchangeable protons with those of bulk water. The MR contrast is switched “ON” and “OFF” via irradiation with radiofrequency (RF) pulses [11].
As MR scans move towards functional detection, researchers have investigated activatable nanoparticle-based MR contrast agents as viable candidates to detect several biological processes. These new types of agents elicit a response to specific stimuli, thereby reporting the presence of phenomena such as an acidic pH, active enzymes, or redox environment [20,21]. Ideally, the contrast agent will go from a non-detectable OFF state to a detectable ON state after interaction with the stimuli of interest, which acts as the activation trigger [5]. The advantage of using an activatable contrast agent is to gain insight on dynamic biological processes and obtain functional diagnostic information in real time to help determine disease risks and severity staging [21,22]. Unlike most contrast agents of the past, activatable nanoparticle-based contrast agents are “not always on” [11]. One of the major issues with those contrast agents is the continuous emission of signal regardless of the proximity and interaction with target tissues and cells. This behavior results in a low target-to-background ratio, making it difficult to detect the target of interest [11]. Activatable nanoparticle-based contrast agents reverse these behaviors by shielding MR contrast until nanoparticles interact with the activation trigger. Specific interactions between activating factors at target sites and nanoparticles result in the activation of MR signal and the maximization of signal at target sites compared to “always on” contrast agents. This process improves the specificity and sensitivity of the imaging nanoprobe.
Most activatable nanoparticle-based contrast agent candidates in the pipeline are often designed to detect biochemical processes in cancers and other inflammatory diseases. These candidates detect changes in the pH of the tumor microenvironment of various cancers, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) or caspase dysregulation, and redox imbalance. Detecting tissue or cell redox is particularly interesting because it reports changes in chemical metabolic processes as well as changes characteristic of chronic inflammatory diseases. Under healthy circumstances, intracellular and extracellular redox environments are tightly regulated in tissues [23]. The dysregulation of antioxidants such as glutathione results in changes in redox state which are usually associated with physiological and pathophysiological disorders. Studies have pinpointed altered redox as a culprit in the increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [24,25,26]. ROS play an important role in cellular proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and senescence. However, excessive ROS production has been linked to tissue injury, endothelial dysfunction, and poor inflammatory response [27,28,29]. Researchers have capitalized on the role of redox in inflammatory diseases by creating several contrast agents that interact with biothiols and free radicals to activate or release encapsulated contrast agents in vitro and in vivo [30]. These contrast agents report on the abnormal production and expression of redox molecules. In this review, we explore the most recent advances in redox-sensitive contrast agent candidates capable of detecting inflammation. Each agent is classified according to the activating factor, while the mechanism and strategies underlying their activation will be discussed in detail within each section.

2. Glutathione Activatable Nanoparticle-Based Contrast Agents

Glutathione (GSH) is the most abundant low-molecular-weight thiol and has been investigated extensively as an antioxidant [31]. Glutathione disulfide (GSSG) is produced during thiol oxidation and promotes the formation of disulfide bonds, which are critical to the formation of proteins’ secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structures. Disulfide bonds are considered great linkers because they are unstable and easily broken down by GSH [31,32]. The interactions between GSH and disulfide bonds make GSH a great target for redox-based nanoparticles. Some of these particles are turned OFF with surface coatings linked by disulfide bonds. In the presence of GSH, the bond will be cleaved, allowing or restricting access to water resulting in contrast. The presence of glutathione is key to biological functions as it aids detoxification and protects against oxidative damage.

2.1. MR Specific Glutathione Responsive Contrast Agents

Reductive environments are very common in inflammatory diseases often diagnosed with MR scans due to changes in the level of glutathione produced at the disease site. Some of these contrast agent candidates are specific to MR scans and not investigated for multimodal imaging. One of these agents was created by Ye and coworkers [30]. The group created a contrast agent that consists of gadolinium (Gd (III); Gd3+) chelates conjugated to an acyclic precursor that self-assembles when exposed to a thiol reducing environment [30]. The Gd (III) chelates undergo intramolecular macrocyclization to form hydrophobic macrocycles that then self-assemble into Gd (III) nanoparticles (GdNPs). The synthesis of the probe led to the development of two isomers, 1-I and 1-II, which were confirmed as isomers when the chiral center was removed via oxidation to form probe 1-O. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) confirmed both isomers, and the oxidation compounds were able to successfully self-assemble into GdNPs when exposed to a reducing environment both in buffer and human breast cancer cells MDA-468. Furthermore, 1-I, 1-II, and 1-O all had r1 relaxivity (r1) similar to those of regular Gd (III) chelates. After disulfide reduction, all probes showed an increase in r1 at a field strength of 0.5 T, specifically 1.5-fold (1-I), 1.6-fold (1-II), and 1.4-fold (I-O) increases. Similar r1 increases were also observed at field strengths of 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Overall, 1-O showed the highest r1 relaxivity across all field strengths: 34.2 mM−1s−1 at 0.5 T, 31.8 mM−1s−1 at 1.5 T, and 21.0 mM−1s−1 at 3 T. Interestingly, the r1 relaxitivity of 1-O was eight times greater at 3T than the clinically used Gd3+ contrast agent Dotarem. Incubation with the biothiol glutathione showed T1 values of 17 ± 4 ms in 1-I and 74 ± 5 ms in 1-II. Similar levels of T1 values were also achieved when the GdNPs were incubated with HeLa cells, showing that the nanoparticle can activate at biologically relevant levels. This study presents a straightforward method to functionalize GdNP to detect biological redox, specifically GSH. The macrocyclization chemistry-mediated self-assembly concept should be investigated further to understand the potential benefits to redox activatable nanoparticle-based contrast agents as well as the potential roles of disulfide reduction in the enhancement of relaxivity.
Given the promising results obtained from redox functionalized Gd (III) chelate particles to detect T1 signals, Li et al. fabricated glutathione-activated MR nanoprobes that detect cancerous cells utilizing the distance change between T1 and T2 MR contrast agents [33]. The nanoparticle was comprised of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIOs; Fe3O4), gadolinium, polyethylene glycol (PEG) and cystamine (SS) (Fe3O4-SS-PEG Gd2O3). Cystamine was used to link the gadolinium and iron oxide nanoparticles because of its disulfide linkage capability. Iron oxide interfered with the T1 effects of gadolinium when in close proximity in the nanoprobe, thereby turning off the T1 contrasting ability. In the presence of GSH, cystamine was cleaved, allowing T1 enhancement by gadolinium. To investigate cystamine cleavage and the enhancement of T1 signals, Fe3O4-SS-PEG Gd2O3 was exposed to different molecules such as glucose, fructose, glutathione, alanine, and histidine. MR scans showed significant T1 signal enhancement (4×) when particles were exposed to glutathione compared to other biomolecules. Having confirmed the glutathione-mediated activation of T1 signals, the concentration-dependent effects of glutathione on Fe3O4-SS-PEG Gd2O3 were further investigated. The glutathione activation of nanoparticles appeared to plateau at 3 mM concentration and did not improve signal at higher concentrations. Fe3O4-SS-PEG Gd2O3 was functionalized with nucleolin-targeted DNA aptamer (AS1411- Fe3O4-SS-PEG Gd2O3) and exposed to human kidney cancer cells (786-0 cells) for further studies into the in vitro activation of T1 signals. The results showed that AS1411-Fe3O4-SS-PEG Gd2O3 specifically bound to nucleolin, which is overexpressed in cancer cells, facilitating uptake of the nanoprobe and the subsequent cellular activation of T1 signals. Strong T1 signals were observed 1 h post nanoprobe treatment. Slight toxicity to 786-0 cells was also detected for higher concentrations, but this was not statistically significant. After Li et al.’s success with dual T1 and T2 agents, Kim and colleagues investigated redox induced dual simultaneous T1/T2 MR contrast agent activation [34]. Unlike Li and Co., this research group performed a more in-depth analysis of an activatable T1/T2 dual-mode MR probe consisting of an Fe3O4 hybrid nanocrystal core coated with trimanganese tetraoxide (Mn3O4; manganese—Mn) (Figure 1). The nanocrystals were synthesized via a seed-mediated growth method and encapsulated within amphiphilic PEG derivatives. These redox-responsive activatable nanostarsells (RANS) were activated by glutathione in an intracellular reducing environment. The GSH activation of RANS resulted in an r1 relaxivity of 16.1 mM−1s−1 and an r2 relaxivity (r2) of 258.6 mM−1s−1, both significantly higher than in the ‘OFF” state of 2.4 mM−1s−1 and 92.2 mM−1s−1, respectively. The T1/T2 MR contrasts of the RANS were investigated in vitro using human gastric cancer cells (MKN-45). Cells treated with RANS showed a 187.9% contrast increase in the T1-weighted image and a 338.5% contrast increase in the T2-weighted image when compared to non-treated cells. RANS were tested in vivo in MKN-45 tumor-bearing mice. The results showed that nanoparticles that accumulated in tumors had a 49.8% increase in T1 signal intensity and a 63.7% decrease in T2 signal intensity 2 h after injection. With these results, the potential of the T1/T2 dual-mode MR probe was established.
Recent investigation into GSH activatable contrast agents aimed to develop a novel contrast agent based on sensitive superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles (SIONPs) with enhanced MR signal for the specific diagnosis of glioma [35]. Currently, the only available method to diagnose glioma is biopsy, which is often invasive and risky. The contrast agent core SIONPs were encapsulated with methoxy-poly-(ethylene glycol)-S-S-hexadecyl (mPEG-S-S-C16), which acted as a firm coating over the nanoparticles to ensure efficient delivery of the contrast agent to the target tumor site. The interaction of the contrast agent with the GSH at the tumor site resulted in the enhancement of the MR signal and helped in the specific diagnosis of glioma. The T2-weighted MR images taken at 3T indicated that the r2 relaxivity of SIONPs and non-sensitive superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles (NIONPs) was similar in the absence of GSH. However, the introduction of GSH resulted in a 1.83-fold increase in r2 for SIONPs compared to no significant change detected in NIONPs. These changes in r2 values demonstrated the GSH-dependent enhancement of the MR signals using SIONPs. The GSH-dependent behavior of the SIONPs was tested in vivo using a subcutaneous tumor model. T2-weighted enhancement was detected in models treated with SIONPs and NIONPs. In vivo activation of the T2 signal was highest in tumor regions treated with SIONPs, with a significant loss in signal intensity compared to NIONPs (Figure 2). The results indicate that GSH-dependent SIONP-based MR contrast agents can be used in the formation of a non-invasive differential diagnosis method for glioma. Despite promising results, the primary concern with these contrast agent candidates releasing metals such as manganese remains biocompatibility, which might raise toxicity issues. Further studies into biocompatibility are required to better understand the clinical potential of these contrast agent candidates.

2.2. Multimodal Glutathione Responsive Contrast Agents

Several researchers have advanced glutathione-mediated redox responsive nanoparticle-based contrast agents by formulating multimodal agents. These agents can provide functional diagnostic information from multiple imaging modalities at the same time. One such agent was formulated by Zheng et al. in 2016. This research group investigated trimodal efficacy by fabricating a redox-sensitive fluorescence/19F-MRS/1H-MR triple-functional nanoprobe [36]. The nanoprobe was comprised of gadolinium chelate linked with a quenched amino oxyluciferin fluorophore and a 19F-bearing moiety. Amino oxyluciferin was attached to the 19F-bearing moiety through a disulfide linker that can be cleaved by biothiols to activate the particle. In the presence of biothiols such as GSH, the nanoprobe enhanced T1 signals significantly. The relaxivity for activated nanoprobes was 23.6 ± 0.2 mM−1s−1 compared to inactivated nanoprobes, which had r1 values of 5.4 ± 0.3 mM−1s−1. Having established a nanoprobe sensitive to GSH, HeLa cells were used to investigate the in vitro activation of the nanoprobes. T1 values of the activated nanoprobes were much higher (at least 175 ms) than the control (about 120 ms), which lacked the disulfide linker. This study provided early stage evidence that the redox-sensitive fluorescence/19F-MRS/1H-MR triple-functional nanoprobe is capable of inducing MR contrast via disulfide bond cleavage despite roles in other image modalities.
Around the same time, Gallo and coworkers created manganese dioxide (MnO2) nanosheets that could be activated as T1 contrast agents and deliver carbon quantum dots (CQDs) under certain physiological conditions to act as targeted, multimodal MR/optical probes [37]. In the MnO2 nanosheets, Mn4+ showed weak paramagnetic properties, and the fluorescence of the CQDs was quenched due to their close proximity to the sheets. When exposed to GSH or H2O2, MnO2 was reduced to Mn2+, which is a highly paramagnetic T1 contrast agent. The nanosheet dissolved and released the CQDs, allowing an optical signal to be generated. The nanosheets were created entirely in water using glucose as a mild reducing agent and ligand, removing the need for harsh chemicals and organic solvents used to create other contrast agents. When introduced into A549 human epithelial cells, the MnO2-CQDs showed no cytotoxicity. A 26.03% increase in signal intensity in T1—weighted contrast was seen 12 min after the addition of the nanosheets. Gallo and coworkers believe that this will create an effective method to improve the specificity of MR and that the simple, eco-friendly preparation method can be scaled up to industrially relevant quantities.
The most recent advancement of GSH-mediated trimodal imaging investigated the use of a GSH sensitive, liver-targeted probe for the real-time visualization of hepatic GSH levels for the diagnosis and prognosis of acute hepatitis. Hu and coworkers aim to create a better method for measuring hepatic GSH levels than existing GSH-responsive fluorescent imaging probes, which are limited by the low penetration depth of light in the liver [38]. GdNPs-Gal were formed via the molecular coassembly of a GSH-responsive Gd(III) MR probe and a liver targeting probe (1-Gal). The GdNPs-Gal showed a high r1 relaxivity with low fluorescence and 19F-MRS signal. Once exposed to GSH, disulfide bonds were reduced and the NPs disassembled, reducing r1 relaxivity and 1H-MR contrast but increasing fluorescence and 19F-MRS signal. In vitro, the initial r1 relaxivity of GdNPs-Gal was 15.6 ± 0.3 mM−1s−1 at 0.5 T, which was about three times higher than Dotarem. After the introduction of GSH, the r1 relaxivity declined to 5.3 ± 0.1 mM−1s−1. The T1 relaxation time increased from 382 ms to 838 ms after incubation with GSH for 1 h, in a concentration dependent manner. GdNPs-Gal were injected in vivo into lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory mice. A bright T1—weighted MR contrast was observed in the liver 1 h after injection, showing the nanoparticles accumulated in the liver. After 1 h, a rapid decline in MR contrast was detected because of reduced r1 relaxivity triggered by cleavage and the activation of nanoparticles. In contrast, GSH-inert GdNPs-Gal-control showed an increase in T1 weighted MR contrast that remained high for more than 8 hrs. With these results obtained, Hu et al. showed that their GdNPs-Gal could effectively target the liver and be activated upon reduction by elevated levels of GSH. Although GSH has shown promising results both in vitro and in vivo, none of these nanoparticles are approved by the food and drug administration (FDA), which highlights the challenges of translating nanoparticle-based contrast agents from bench to bedside (Table 1).

3. ROS Activatable Nanoparticle-Based Contrast Agents

Reactive oxygen species are chemical species produced as byproducts of normal cellular metabolism [23]. Even though they are highly unstable, very reactive and short lived, they are capable of independent existence. At low to moderate levels, they play important roles in various physiological conditions such as redox regulation, immune response, mitogenic response, and cellular signaling pathways [23]. However, high levels of ROS result in oxidative stress, which can damage cells, tissues, and biomolecules due to the poor regulation of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants [28,29]. Several inflammatory diseases such as atherosclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, cancers, diabetes mellitus, and neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by ROS dysfunction [39,40]. Increased levels of ROS are associated with the pathogenesis of many diseases, and a non-toxic agent activated by ROS could improve not only disease diagnosis, but also treatment monitoring of disease over time and therefore patient outcomes. Therefore, researchers have actively explored the formulation of nanoparticle-based contrast agents sensitive to ROS to detect inflammatory diseases. These nanoparticles can be oxidized by different species of ROS, thereby activating the contrast agent’s properties.

3.1. Peroxide Sensitive Agents

Peroxides are perhaps the most targeted species of ROS by nanomaterial scientists. Amongst peroxides, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) has been targeted and investigated extensively, partly because it is the second most abundant species of ROS in the body [41]. It is also actively involved in the synthesis and generation of other species of ROS [42,43]. Given the importance of peroxides, researchers have developed contrast agents capable of detecting peroxide. One of these investigations was conducted by Fu and coworkers, who created a novel 19F polymeric imaging agent that can be activated in the presence of ROS [44]. The nanoparticles consisted of thioether- and fluorine-containing methacrylate monomers synthesized via atom transfer radical polymerization. The polymers self-assembled into nanoparticles with a strong hydrophobic core in an aqueous solution. In the core, the movement of the fluorinated segments was limited, shortening the T2 relaxation times and reducing the 19F NMR signal. In the presence of ROS, the hydrophobic thioether groups were oxidized and the nanoparticles disaggregated. Once disassembled, the T2 relaxation times of 19F were lengthened and the NMR signal increased. In addition, the researchers also made the nanoparticles sensitive to pH, increasing the change in intensity when the agents were exposed to ROS in a mildly acidic environment. A polymer with 4.7 weight percent (wt%) fluorine was treated with H2O2 and after 20 h of oxidation, the 19F T2 relaxation time was lengthened to 34 ms, causing a brighter image. Before oxidation, no 19FMR signal was observed. The ROS/pH dual responsive 19F MR agent showed increased signal when exposed to either low pH or H2O2, and an even greater increase in signal when exposed to both. However, at lower levels of ROS, they observed a slower oxidation rate and the conversion of thioether groups was limited to 23%. Moving forward, the research group plan to increase the sensitivity of the polymers to ROS before starting in vivo experiments.
A peroxide-sensitive, nanoparticle-based contrast agent was also created by Rodríguez and colleagues. Their research group developed a peroxidase-sensitive T1 MR contrast agent comprised of a macrocyclic Gd-DOTAGA core with 5-hydroxytryptamide (5-HT) moiety [45]. The contrast agent was designed to overcome current limitations associated with nanoparticle-based contrast agents such as poor solubility in aqueous media and poor release of Gd (III) in vivo. Inflammation in the lungs proceeds when leukocytes (neutrophils, eosinophils, and alveolar macrophages) are activated, and they release oxidative enzymes such as myeloperoxidase (MPO) and eosinophil peroxidase (EOP) that can produce ROS. In the presence of H2O2, the oxidases can oxidize the Gd3+ complexes bearing 5-HT or related moieties to form oligomers or adducts with plasma and matrix proteins. Thus, the r1 relaxivity of Gd3+ is increased due to the increased rotational correlation time and retention by its increased size. In horseradish peroxidase/hydrogen peroxide conditions, Gd-5-HT-DOTAGA showed 1.7-fold increased r1 in 20 min; however, Gd-T-DOTAGA showed no change. Gd-5-HT-DOTAGA also showed 40% increased r1 when it was incubated with 0.3 U MPO in lung tissue homogenate, while there was no change with Gd-T-DOTAGA in the same condition. For in vivo T1-weighted imaging, bleomycin was injected into the lungs of C57BL/6 mice via intratracheal instillation, resulting in a strong inflammatory response causing fibrosis. Gd-5-HT-DOTAGA triggered strong T1 MR signal in the lungs of bleomycin-injured mice but not in uninjured mice. With the observed results, Gd-5-HT-DOTAGA, with improved solubility and stability, provided the potential to assess specific detection of lung inflammation by MR.
Further, Wang and colleagues expanded their knowledge of peroxide-sensitive contrast agents by introducing a redox-active iron complex, Fe-PyC3A, that could switch between Fe3+-PyC3A and Fe2+-PyC3A through oxidation by hydrogen peroxide [46]. The researchers hypothesized that the relaxivity difference between Fe2+ and Fe3+ oxidation states is large enough to be detectable in vivo with a standard dose of the Fe2+ complex. The r1 of Fe3+-PyC3A was 10-, 13.3-, and 14.5-fold higher than Fe2+-PyC3A in pH 7.4 Tris buffer at 1.4, 4.7, and 11.7 T, respectively. To test the capability of Fe-PyC3A to detect ROS in a murine model, the research group developed a mild edematous pancreatic inflammation and acute inflammation model with caerulein (50 µg/kg in saline) and lipopolysaccharide (10 mg/kg in saline) that can stimulate neutrophil activation and ROS production via intraperitoneal injection. After the injection of Fe2+-PyC3A, selective significant signal enhancement was detected from the inflamed pancreas, indicating that the Fe2+ complex was rapidly converted to the high relaxivity Fe3+ oxidation state in the presence of ROS (Figure 3). Together with other studies reviewed, the versatility of peroxide-activatable nanoparticle-based contrast agents shows great promise in the detection of inflammation. Investigation should be advanced to complex biological systems to better understand efficacy and functionalities.

3.2. Nanoparticles Sensitive to Other Species of ROS

In a deviation from more conventional GSH and peroxide-activated contrast agents, our lab’s work by Yoo et al. advanced redox responsive particles by creating activatable interpolymer complex-superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (IPC-SPIOs) that are sensitive to superoxide [47]. In that preliminary study, IPC-SPIOs were comprised of a superparamagnetic iron oxide core coated with PEG and complexed with poly(gallol) (Figure 4). Complexation, which is the process of hydrogen bonding poly(gallol) to PEG, creates an interpolymer complex that pushes water away from the core, but is sensitive to oxidation. The exposure of IPC-SPIOs to exogenous sources of ROS resulted in ROS scavenging, IPC-SPIO decomplexation, and the activation of T2 MR signals as water hydrated the core SPIO. MR scans of ROS-treated complexed IPC-SPIOs (0.25 mg/mL) showed complexed and decomplexed r2 values of 7 ± 2 mM−1·s−1 and 70 ± 10 mM−1·s−1, respectively. Yoo et al. showed, for the first-time, a T2 contrast agent candidate complexed with poly(gallol) activated by oxidation.
With early stage evidence established, Nwasike et al. investigated biologically relevant ROS-mediated IPC-SPIOs activation by macrophages and endothelial cells [48]. Using the 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA) ROS detection assay, IPC-SPIOs scavenged over 70% of available ROS in macrophages and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) in vitro with no toxicity. The activation of T2 MR signal was observed in macrophages treated with IPC-SPIOs. The T2 values of macrophages treated with IPC-SPIOs ranged from 174 ms to 149 ms pre- to post-cellular ROS exposure, indicating about 15% T2 signal activation after 6 h. MR contrast detected in macrophages treated with IPC-SPIOs was also 80% higher compared to the controls. Follow-up work with in-depth analysis and functionalization of IPC-SPIOs with a targeting biomolecule to improve nanoparticle uptake to further improve activatable MR contrast is currently underway.
Other research groups, such as Li et al. have also contributed to the advancement of nanoparticles sensitive to species of ROS not previously explored. In their work, Li and coworkers developed a fluorinated bihydrazide conjugated to gadolinium-tetraazacyclododecanetetraacetic acid (Gd-DOTA) complex to detect hypochlorous acid (HClO) using 19F NMR/MR [49]. The 19F NMR/MR agent was comprised of Gd-DOTA complex linked with 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzoic acid via a bihydrazide linker. In the presence of HClO, the bihydrazide linker was selectively oxidized and broken. As a result, the recovery of the T1 and T2 of the fluorine atoms was significantly increased due to the decreased paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE) effect of Gd-DOTA, responsive to HClO. In the real-time detection of HClO in biological systems, the nanoparticle demonstrated the ability to activate under HClO and image hepatocellular carcinoma human hepatocarcinoma SMMC-7721 cells in nude mice. SMMC-7721 cells were treated with HClO, excess H2O2, and HClO plus taurine, which is a HClO scavenger. A strong 19F NMR signal was observed only from the cells exposed to HClO. In addition, a quantitative analysis indicated the high selectivity to HClO based on the relatively greater signal-to-noise ratio of the HClO exposed group compared to the other groups. In vivo imaging of HClO with nude mice showed that strong 19F NMR signal was only detected around the area treated with HClO, indicating outstanding specificity. This investigation provides an alternative to more conventional ROS targets. The 19F NMR/MR probe (Gd-DOTA-BTFPH) small molecular conjugate could be used as a potential imaging probe for the selective detection and real-time imaging of hypochlorous acid in organisms.
In a recent communication, Zhou et al. proposed an activatable MR contrast agent capable of detecting the efficacy of radiotherapy in cancer patients [50]. The contrast agent was built as a nanovesicle structure comprised of a triblock poly(ethylene glycol)–poly(propylene sulfide)–poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG–PPS–PEG) amphiphilic copolymer with iron oxide nanoparticles (IO NPs) in the membrane and gadolinium (IO-Gd NV) species on the surface. Inflammation triggers the activatable properties of the nanoparticle as interaction with factors such as ROS results in the self-assembly and disassembly of the IO-Gd NVs. The self-assembly and disassembly process leads to T1 OFF-ON effects. To confirm IO-Gd NV ability for stratification, in vivo studies using Balb/c mouse 4T1 tumor models were conducted to investigate the response to radiotherapy. T1 mapping results showed different levels of T1 signal enhancement in mice treated with radiotherapy only (323 ± 37 ms), radiotherapy and aLy6G (neutrophil depleting antibody; T1 = 273 ± 33 ms), radiotherapy and G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; T1 = 1372 ± 221 ms), and radiotherapy plus DPI (diphenyleneiodonium, a NADPH oxidase inhibitor; T1 = 364 ± 121 ms). The different T1 values detected pointed to the different responses to treatment and the effectiveness of radiotherapy in different conditions. This study could be very useful in clinical settings as understanding tumor response to treatment would help quicken decisions and strategies for treatment, thereby saving time and improving patient outcomes (Table 2).

4. Emerging Redox Environment Responsive Contrast Agents

Redox-responsive agents based on unique bioprocesses and materials have been investigated by researchers to advance the field from a different perspective. Several years ago, Dunbar and coworkers explored the use of copper as a redox-sensitive MR contrast agent [51]. Even though the relaxivity of copper is lower than that of the available agents, its ability to switch between copper (I) and copper (II) makes it a potential novel activatable contrast agent. The copper(II) macrocycles tested were ([Cu(II)SenNpr]2+, [Cu(II)SprNen]2+, [Cu(II)SprNpr]2+) and [Cu(II)SprNen(X)2]2+, where X was replaced by different chemical chains. These copper(II) macrocycles were compared with gadopentetic acid (Gd(DTPA)) and Cu(BF4)2. The r1 relaxivity of ([Cu(II)SenNpr]2+, [Cu(II)SprNen]2+, [Cu(II)SprNpr]2+), and [Cu(II)SprNen(–(CH2)2SPh )2]2+ were 0.27 ± 0.03 mM−1·s−1, 0.27 ± 0.01 mM−1·s−1, 0.26 ± 0.03 mM−1·s−1, and 0.12 ± 0.02 mM−1·s−1, respectively, whereas the r1 relaxivity of the reference compounds Gd(DTPA) and Cu(BF4)2 were 4.73 mM−1·s−1 and 0.67 mM−1·s−1, respectively. The redox cycling results indicated that [Cu(II)SprNen(–(CH2)2SPh )2]2+ macrocycle was the only one that was reversible and could switch to copper(I) due to an increase in sulfur density. In addition, it was also discovered that the highest re-oxidation efficiency was approximately 85%. The researchers concluded that copper needs to be combined with a compound with higher relaxivity for better results, but their current findings show the potential of copper as a redox-sensitive MR contrast agent. For now, the primary concern with copper would be biocompatibility, which might raise toxicity issues. It might be challenging to balance toxicity while delivering a sufficient amount of copper for MR contrast. Understanding biocompatibility might be key to unlocking this contrast agent candidate.
Gale and coworkers followed up by investigating the use of a novel Mn-based MR contrast agent that could isomerize between Mn3+ and Mn2+ using a Janus ligand attached to HBED (N,N′-Bis(2-hydroxybenzyl)ethylenediamine-N,N′-diacetic acid), and BPED (N,N′-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)ethylenediamine-N,N′-diacetate(2-)) known as JED ligand [52]. The function of a Janus ligand is to promote interchange between Mn3+ and Mn2+ states. Unlike other ligand systems, JED could support redox states by presenting a HBED-type and BPED-type donor set to Mn3+ and Mn2+, respectively, on oxidation or reduction. The r1 values of Mn3+- and Mn2+-JED in water and plasma indicated that Mn2+ had much higher relaxation values than Mn3+. For Mn2+, the r1 values were 3.3 ± 0.006 mM−1·s−1, 4.3 ± 0.32 mM−1·s−1, and 2.5 ± 0.008 mM−1·s−1, whereas Mn3+ had r1 values of 0.5 ± 0.001 mM−1·s−1, 0.9 ± 0.002 mM−1·s−1, and 0.5 ± 0.001 mM−1·s−1 at 1.4 T, 4.7 T, and 11.7 T, respectively. These results were supported by comparing the T1-weighted MR images of Mn-JED and a Gd3+-based agent, which indicated that the Mn2+-JED solution was much brighter than the Mn3+ solution and the difference between the Gd-based agent images was not significant. The r1 change at 1.4 T for Mn-JED and Gd-based agents was 380% and 15%, respectively, which doubled when measured in plasma. These current findings indicate that the Janus ligand can provide a new, promising model for developing MR contrast agents.

5. Redox Activatable Combined Diagnostic and Therapeutic Agents

Medical imaging is primarily used to screen, diagnose, and stage disease in patients as well as monitor treatment and investigate relapse in patients. Recently, therapeutics have been gradually incorporating imaging, which is facilitating a new age of image-guided therapy. This new method of therapy is very attractive because it allows for more accurate therapeutic planning and observed therapeutic delivery and efficacy. With the advent of activatable imaging technologies, several drugs have been incorporated into activatable contrast agents to accomplish image-guided therapy. These types of therapies rely on the activation of the contrast agent upon interaction with an activation trigger, which will release drugs as well as MR contrast agents simultaneously. The key advantage of this type of treatment is that it permits functional imaging as treatment is ongoing in a minimally invasive process.
Several years ago, Chen et al. reported a new multifunctional drug delivery system based on mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) capped by gadolinium-based bovine serum albumin complex (BSA-Gd) and hyaluronic acid (HA) via a reductive-cleavable disulfide bond to release therapeutics and enhance T1 MR signal intensity (Figure 5) [53]. The thiol-functionalized MSN (MSN-SH) nanoparticle was synthesized via a one-pot reaction. MSN-ss-COOH was obtained from MSN-SH with 2,2-dithiodipyridine and 3-mercaptopropionic acid treatments via disulfide bonds, which could be broken by a relatively high level of GSH in tumor cells. Subsequently, BSA-Gd complex was conjugated on the surface of MSN-ss-COOH via a carbodiimide-catalyzed amidation reaction, denoted as MSN-ss-Gd-BSA. Finally, MSN-ss-GHA, HA-coated MSN-ss-Gd-BSA nanoparticles, were prepared via amide formation. Anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX) was also incorporated into the nanocomplex, resulting in DOX@MSN-ss-GHA. In the presence of 10 mM GSH (tumor microenvironment) at pH 5.0, the disulfide bond in MSN-ss-GHA was broken to release the DOX (up to 67.12% with a faster rate due to the faster diffusion rate of DOX at pH 5.0 than pH 7.4). Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images showed that MSN-ssGHA has enhanced cell uptake efficacy by 4T1 cells (murine breast cancer cell line) compared to the control MSN-ss-COOH. This is because of the specific binding efficacy of the HA component with the overexpressed CD44 receptor. MSN-ss-GHA enhanced T1 signals with an r1 value of 17.38 mM−1s−1 compared to commercial Gd-DTPA contrast agents (4.39 mM−1s−1). Overall, the great efficacy shown by MSN-ss-GHA nanoparticles makes it a promising theranostic candidate for cancer detection and therapy.
Subsequently, Zhang and coworkers explored a multimodal nanoparticle-based contrast agent candidate in combination with cancer therapy. The researchers investigated the use of a nanoagent sensitive to redox features of tumors for the precise treatment of cancer using the combined effects of chemotherapy and photothermal therapy (PTT), compatible with MR imaging, fluorescence imaging, and photothermal imaging [54]. The development of such a multi-functional theranostic nanoagent was important for the site-specific and efficient treatment of hypoxic solid tumors. Silicon dioxide (SiO2) coated with a gold (Au) shell and a MnO2 sheet with doxorubicin hydrochloride as the photothermal nanomaterial and chemotherapeutic carrier, respectively, completed the aptamer (Apt) modified nanoagent (SiO2@Au@MnO2–DOX/Apt). On interaction with tumors, the nanoagent released Mn2+ and DOX simultaneously, leading to an increase in the efficiency of chemotherapy. The presence of Mn2+, the decomposition of MnO2, and the absorption of near infrared (NIR) light were all monitored with MR, fluorescence imaging, and photothermal imaging, respectively. The redox activated drug release was assessed in vitro using MR and fluorescence imaging. The results indicated that the SiO2@Au@MnO2–DOX/Apt nanoagent remained stable for over 72 h, and only 10% of the drug leaked from the nanoagent. Further, the nanoagent depicted a 43% sharp increase at 5 h and a 90% sharp increase at 10 h when 1 mM and 10 mM glutathione were added. The MR results indicated that the nanoagent has the potential to offer T1 contrast due to the reduction of MnO2 to paramagnetic Mn2+ ions in the presence of GSH. T1-weighted MR images indicated that the contrast signal was much higher in the injected group as compared to the control group. The results show that there is a potential in the redox-activated nanoagent to enhance the efficiency of cancer detection and treatments.
The combination of photothermal therapy and redox-sensitive nanoparticle-based contrast agent was further explored by Fu and coworkers by adding manganese to copper-selenium nanoparticles. The researchers developed a novel aqueous process to coat MnO2 on nanomaterials to form nanomaterial-based MnO2 core-shell nanostructures [55]. This method can be used to combine any nanomaterial with MnO2, which can lead to the enhancement of the redox-responsive contrast agents by using the properties of both the materials. Cu2−xSe NPs were combined with MnO2 to form Cu2−xSe@MnO2 theranostic nanostructures, where MnO2 was sensitive to redox changes at tumor sites resulting in high T1 MR signals, and Cu2−xSe exhibited photothermal properties at 1064 nm to kill cancer cells. These nanostructures exhibited good blood compatibility, as only 2.2% hemolysis was seen after 4 h exposure and the molar extinction coefficient was also found to be seven times larger than that of the available Cu9S5 NPs. The redox sensitivity of the nanostructure was tested by adding dithiothreitol (DTT), which indicated a significant increase in r1 relaxivity from 2.26 mM−1.s−1 to 7.51 mM−1.s−1. The nanostructure was tested in vivo on nude mice with a CT26 tumor using a 1.5 T scanner, while the ratio of the pre- and post-injection signal-to-noise ratio was calculated to quantify the T1 signal intensity. The results indicated a 160% increase in T1 signal intensity at 30 min post-injection of the Cu2−xSe@MnO2 nanostructures, which remained constant for 60 min, after which a slight decrease was detected at 90 min. Despite this encouraging data, further investigation into the biocompatibility of copper-selenium should be conducted, particularly into the effect on healthy non-cancerous surrounding tissue. Extensive toxicity studies will advance this contrast agent candidate.
Most recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT) and MR contrast were also explored. Wan and coworkers developed a GSH-unlocked Mn(III)-sealed metal-organic framework (MOF) nanosystem as a redox-activated theranostic agent for tumors [56]. The high expression of glutathione in tumor cells resists PDT and scavenges cellular ROS, limiting the clinical application of PDT. The proposed nMOF consisted of Mn(III) coordinated with a porphyrin (TCPP)-based ligand to form Mn(III)-TCPP MOFs by a one-pot method. Once internalized by the tumor cell, the Mn(III)-TCCP MOF was reduced by intracellular GSH to create glutathione disulfide, Mn(II), and free TCCP. The simultaneously activated Mn(II)-based T1-weighted MR imaging and TCCP-based optical imaging reduce GSH levels and controllably generate ROS. In the presence of GSH, the MOFs showed a 2.3-fold increase in T1 relaxation rate compared to the control, showing its potential as a GSH-activated T1 contrast agent. In vitro, fluorescence imaging showed that the GSH level of 4T1 cells decreased to 40% due to the reduction of the MOFs compared to groups treated with Mn(OAc)2 or TCPP, in which levels rose up to 90%. The MOFs were intratumorally injected into mice, and the brightness of the tumor region increased within 30 min of injection, showing a GSH-enhanced Mn-based T1 contrast signal. The MOFs showed no systemic toxicity in mice, even at high doses, and a hemolysis test implied biosafety and biocompatibility. It was concluded that the GSH-unlocked MOFs have the potential to increase the therapeutic effect of PDT, while avoiding negative side-effects to healthy tissue, and achieve tumor inhibition via GSH depletion.
Despite recent advancements in photo-based therapies, researchers have also loaded redox-sensitive nanoparticle-based contrast agents with drugs that are simultaneously released with contrast agents after interactions with redox environments. Recently, Wang and coworkers presented a platelet membrane (PLTM) with biomimetic bufalin-loaded hollow MnO2 nanoparticles (NPs) as a tumor microenvironment (TME)-activated MR contrast agent (PLTM-HMnO2@BU NPs) [57]. In the tumor microenvironment, low valent ions such as Fe2+, Mn2+, and Cu2+ can react with H2O2 to generate hydroxyl radicals (HO∙) via the Fenton reaction. Drug release studies showed that tumor microenvironments such as acidic pH (5.5) and GSH (2 mM) can degrade the hollow MnO2 more rapidly, resulting in the highest bufalin drug release (more than 87%). For in vitro MR studies, the r1 value of PLTM-HMnO2 NPs with GSH (2 mM) was 4.525 mM−1s−1, which is significantly higher compared to the r1 value (0.135 mM−1s−1) of PLTM-HMnO2 NPs without GSH. In vivo MR studies showed that PLTM-HMnO2 NPs injected into the tumor area gradually increased T1 MR signal over time compared to nanoaprticles injected into the muscle area. This was due to the degradation of HMnO2 into Mn2+ by the overexpressed intracellular GSH at the tumor microenvironment. This study presents PLTM-HMnO2@BU NPs as a viable candidate for pH- and redox-sensitive dual responsive drug release MR contrast agents for tumor-specific imaging.
Preliminary GSH-sensitive nanogels containing manganese contrast agent and doxorubicin were developed by Xu and coworkers to simultaneously provide therapy and diagnostic information. The researchers formulated a redox-responsive hybrid nanosystem comprised of manganese dioxide nanoparticles and doxorubicin coated with poly(N-vinylcaprolactam) nanogels (DOX/MnO2@PVCL NGs) [58]. The primary role of the nanogel was to facilitate the image-guided delivery of therapeutics to the tumor microenvironment using MR and ultrasound imaging modalities. In the presence of GSH, the nanogels degraded and triggered the simultaneous release of Mn2+ and DOX at the tumor site for enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and therapy. The efficacy of DOX/MnO2@PVCL NGs was investigated in neutral and acidic tumor microenvironments in the absence of GSH, resulting in 10 and 20% release of DOX over a 7-day period, respectively. When GSH was introduced, drug release improved to 89.5%. The release of Mn2+ was investigated using phantom T1-weighted MR scans. In the presence of GSH, r1 relaxivity was 8.33 mM−1s−1 compared to 0.04 mM−1s−1 detected in the absence of GSH. The nanogel also performed better than clinical Magnevist®, which presented an r1 value of 4.56 mM−1s−1 at 0.5 T. Although still in their infancy, these studies might develop into potent redox-responsive, combined diagnostic and therapeutic agents (Table 3).

6. Conclusions

Contrast agents have advanced significantly in the last several years. Nanoparticle-based redox-activatable contrast agents are emerging as a subfield of interest, allowing for the possibility of visualizing dynamic processes, such as glutathione and ROS activities, in real time. This represents another take on the term “functional” MR imaging as the contrast agents allow for the imaging of a functional disease parameter or process. As the field continues to grow, researchers should consider diversifying investigations into other inflammatory diseases because most activatable agents in the pipeline are designed exclusively to detect different types of cancer, while other inflammatory diseases are less explored. The contrast agent candidates explored in this review are very exciting, but cautious optimism is required, given the small number of nanoparticle-based contrast agents that translate from bench to bedside. Researchers must endeavour to ensure that more products reach the market. Taken together, current efforts need to be sustained to ensure that redox-activatable nanoparticle-based MR contrast agents are available for relevant diseases that require soft tissue diagnostic imaging.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L.D. and C.N.; investigation, C.N.; data curation, A.L.D. and C.N.; writing—original draft preparation, A.L.D., C.N., E.P., E.Y. and J.S.N.; writing—review and editing, A.L.D., C.N. and J.S.N.; supervision, A.L.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by University of Vermont.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Clifford D. Clark Diversity Fellowship at Binghamton University for financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

References

  1. Wahsner, J.; Gale, E.M.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, A.; Caravan, P. Chemistry of MRI Contrast Agents: Current Challenges and New Frontiers. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 957–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Heim, B.; Krismer, F.; De Marzi, R.; Seppi, K. Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neural Transm. 2017, 124, 915–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tocchio, S.; Kline-Fath, B.; Kanal, E.; Schmithorst, V.J.; Panigrahy, A. MRI evaluation and safety in the developing brain. Semin. Perinatol. 2015, 39, 73–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Grover, V.P.; Tognarelli, J.M.; Crossey, M.M.; Cox, I.J.; Taylor-Robinson, S.D.; McPhail, M.J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Principles and Techniques: Lessons for Clinicians. J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 2015, 5, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Lohrke, J.; Frenzel, T.; Endrikat, J.; Alves, F.C.; Grist, T.M.; Law, M.; Lee, J.M.; Leiner, T.; Li, K.-C.; Nikolaou, K.; et al. 25 Years of Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Developments, Current Challenges and Future Perspectives. Adv. Ther. 2016, 33, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Behzadi, A.H.; Farooq, Z.; Newhouse, J.H.; Prince, M.R. MRI and CT contrast media extravasation. Medicine 2018, 97, e0055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xiao, Y.-D.; Paudel, R.; Liu, J.; Ma, C.; Zhang, Z.-S.; Zhou, S.-K. MRI contrast agents: Classification and application (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 38, 1319–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. De León-Rodríguez, L.M.; Martins, A.F.; Pinho, M.C.; Rofsky, N.M.; Sherry, A.D. Basic MR relaxation mechanisms and contrast agent design. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015, 42, 545–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ding, S.; Meystre, N.R.; Campeanu, C.; Gullo, G. Contrast media extravasations in patients undergoing computerized tomography scanning. JBI Database Syst. Rev. Implement. Rep. 2018, 16, 87–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lohrke, J.; Frisk, A.-L.; Frenzel, T.; Schöckel, L.; Rosenbruch, M.; Jost, G.; Lenhard, D.C.; Sieber, M.A.; Nischwitz, V.; Küppers, A.; et al. Histology and Gadolinium Distribution in the Rodent Brain After the Administration of Cumulative High Doses of Linear and Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents. Investig. Radiol. 2017, 52, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Functional Nanoparticles for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5050056/ (accessed on 19 December 2020).
  12. Wang, L.; Huang, J.; Chen, H.; Wu, H.; Xu, Y.; Li, Y.; Yi, H.; Wang, Y.A.; Yang, L.; Mao, H. Exerting Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect Driven Delivery by Ultrafine Iron Oxide Nanoparticles with T1–T2 Switchable Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 4582–4592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Shi, Y.; Van Der Meel, R.; Chen, X.; Lammers, T. The EPR effect and beyond: Strategies to improve tumor targeting and cancer nanomedicine treatment efficacy. Theranostics 2020, 10, 7921–7924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nakamura, Y.; Mochida, A.; Choyke, P.L.; Kobayashi, H. Nanodrug Delivery: Is the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect Sufficient for Curing Cancer? Bioconjug. Chem. 2016, 27, 2225–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, W.; Liu, L.; Chen, H.; Hu, K.; Delahunty, I.; Gao, S.; Xie, J. Surface impact on nanoparticle-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Theranostics 2018, 8, 2521–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Busquets, M.A.; Estelrich, J.; Sánchez-Martín, M.J. Nanoparticles in magnetic resonance imaging: From simple to dual contrast agents. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 1727–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Sinharay, S.; Pagel, M.D. Advances in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents for Biomarker Detection. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2016, 9, 95–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Wu, B.; Warnock, G.; Zaiss, M.; Lin, C.; Chen, M.; Zhou, Z.; Mu, L.; Nanz, D.; Tuura, R.; Delso, G. An overview of CEST MRI for non-MR physicists. EJNMMI Phys. 2016, 3, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Hingorani, D.V.; Bernstein, A.S.; Pagel, M.D. A review of responsive MRI contrast agents: 2005-2014. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2014, 10, 245–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Carril, M. Activatable probes for diagnosis and biomarker detection by MRI. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 4332–4347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Tu, C.; Osborne, E.A.; Louie, A.Y. Activatable T 1 and T 2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2011, 39, 1335–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Hellebust, A.; Richards-Kortum, R.R. Advances in molecular imaging: Targeted optical contrast agents for cancer diagnostics. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 429–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Fisher, A.B. Redox Signaling Across Cell Membranes. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009, 11, 1349–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Chaiswing, L.; Clair, W.H.S.; Clair, D.K.S. Redox Paradox: A Novel Approach to Therapeutics-Resistant Cancer. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2018, 29, 1237–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Navarro-Yepes, J.; Burns, M.; Anandhan, A.; Khalimonchuk, O.; Del Razo, L.M.; Quintanilla-Vega, B.; Pappa, A.; Panayiotidis, M.I.; Franco, R. Oxidative Stress, Redox Signaling, and Autophagy: Cell DeathVersusSurvival. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014, 21, 66–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Agarwal, A.; Bui, A.D. Oxidation-reduction potential as a new marker for oxidative stress: Correlation to male infertility. Investig. Clin. Urol. 2017, 58, 385–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liemburg-Apers, D.C.; Willems, P.H.G.M.; Koopman, W.J.; Grefte, S. Interactions between mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and cellular glucose metabolism. Arch. Toxicol. 2015, 89, 1209–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Yang, M.-S.; Min, K.-J.; Joe, E. Multiple mechanisms that prevent excessive brain inflammation. J. Neurosci. Res. 2007, 85, 2298–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abdulsalam, S.F.; Thowfeik, F.S.; Merino, E.J. Excessive Reactive Oxygen Species and Exotic DNA Lesions as an Exploitable Liability. Biochemistry 2016, 55, 5341–5352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ye, D.; Pandit, P.; Kempen, P.; Lin, J.; Xiong, L.; Sinclair, R.; Rutt, B.; Rao, J. Redox-Triggered Self-Assembly of Gadolinium-Based MRI Probes for Sensing Reducing Environment. Bioconjug. Chem. 2014, 25, 1526–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Forman, H.J.; Zhang, H.; Rinna, A. Glutathione: Overview of its protective roles, measurement, and biosynthesis. Mol. Asp. Med. 2009, 30, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. DePonte, M. Glutathione catalysis and the reaction mechanisms of glutathione-dependent enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1830, 3217–3266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Li, J.; Wang, S.; Wu, C.; Dai, Y.; Hou, P.; Han, C.; Han, C. Activatable molecular MRI nanoprobe for tumor cell imaging based on gadolinium oxide and iron oxide nanoparticle. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 86, 1047–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kim, M.-H.; Son, H.-Y.; Kim, G.-Y.; Park, K.; Huh, Y.-M.; Haam, S. Redoxable heteronanocrystals functioning magnetic relaxation switch for activatable T1 and T2 dual-mode magnetic resonance imaging. Biomaterials 2016, 101, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wu, B.; Deng, K.; Lu, S.-T.; Zhang, M.; Ao, Y.-W.; Wang, H.; Mei, H.; Wang, C.-X.; Xu, H.; Hu, B.; et al. Reduction-active Fe3O4-loaded micelles with aggregation- enhanced MRI contrast for differential diagnosis of Neroglioma. Biomaterials 2021, 268, 120531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zheng, M.; Wang, Y.; Shi, H.; Hu, Y.; Feng, L.; Luo, Z.; Zhou, M.; He, J.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Redox-Mediated Disassembly to Build Activatable Trimodal Probe for Molecular Imaging of Biothiols. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 10075–10085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gallo, J.; Vasimalai, N.; Fernandez-Arguelles, M.T.; Bañobre-López, M. Green synthesis of multimodal ‘OFF–ON’ activatable MRI/optical probes. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 17672–17680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wen, X.; Pan, Y.; Cheng, X.; An, R.; Gao, G.; Chen, H.-Y.; Ye, D. Responsive Trimodal Probes for In Vivo Imaging of Liver Inflammation by Coassembly and GSH-Driven Disassembly. Research 2020, 2020, 4087069. Available online: https://spj.sciencemag.org/journals/research/2020/4087069/ (accessed on 9 December 2020). [CrossRef]
  39. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS). Intimal Thickening, and Subclinical Atherosclerotic Disease. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6688526/ (accessed on 10 October 2020).
  40. Fransen, M.; Nordgren, M.; Wang, B.; Apanasets, O. Role of peroxisomes in ROS/RNS-metabolism: Implications for human disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1822, 1363–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yan, J.; Jiang, J.; He, L.; Chen, L. Mitochondrial superoxide/hydrogen peroxide: An emerging therapeutic target for metabolic diseases. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2020, 152, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wong, H.-S.; Dighe, P.A.; Mezera, V.; Monternier, P.-A.; Brand, M.D. Production of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide from specific mitochondrial sites under different bioenergetic conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 16804–16809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Brand, M.D. Mitochondrial generation of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide as the source of mitochondrial redox signaling. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2016, 100, 14–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Fu, C.; Herbst, S.; Zhang, C.; Whittaker, A.K. Polymeric 19F MRI agents responsive to reactive oxygen species. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 4585–4595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, A.; Shuvaev, S.; Rotile, N.; Jones, C.M.; Probst, C.K.; Ferreira, D.D.S.; Graham-O’Regan, K.; Boros, E.; Knipe, R.S.; Griffith, J.W.; et al. Peroxidase Sensitive Amplifiable Probe for Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pulmonary Inflammation. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 2412–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, H.; Jordan, V.C.; Ramsay, I.A.; Sojoodi, M.; Fuchs, B.C.; Tanabe, K.K.; Caravan, P.; Gale, E.M. Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using a Redox-Active Iron Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 5916–5925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yoo, E.; Cheng, H.A.; Nardacci, L.E.; Beaman, D.J.; Drinnan, C.T.; Lee, C.; Fishbein, K.W.; Spencer, R.G.; Fisher, O.Z.; Doiron, A. Activatable interpolymer complex-superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as magnetic resonance contrast agents sensitive to oxidative stress. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2017, 158, 578–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Nwasike, C.; Yoo, E.; Purr, E.; Doiron, A. Activatable superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles scavenge reactive oxygen species in macrophages and endothelial cells. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 41305–41314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, A.; Tang, X.; Gong, X.; Chen, H.; Lin, H.; Gao, J. A fluorinated bihydrazide conjugate for activatable sensing and imaging of hypochlorous acid by 19F NMR/MRI. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 12455–12458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, Z.; Deng, H.; Yang, W.; Wang, Z.; Lin, L.; Munasinghe, J.; Jacobson, O.; Liu, Y.; Tang, L.; Ni, Q.Q.; et al. Early stratification of radiotherapy response by activatable inflammation magnetic resonance imaging. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dunbar, L.; Sowden, R.J.; Trotter, K.D.; Taylor, M.K.; Smith, D.; Kennedy, A.R.; Reglinski, J.; Spickett, C.M. Copper complexes as a source of redox active MRI contrast agents. BioMetals 2015, 28, 903–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Gale, E.M.; Jones, C.M.; Ramsay, I.; Farrar, C.T.; Caravan, P. A Janus Chelator Enables Biochemically Responsive MRI Contrast with Exceptional Dynamic Range. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 15861–15864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Chen, L.; Zhou, X.; Nie, W.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Y.; He, C. Multifunctional Redox-Responsive Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Efficient Targeting Drug Delivery and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 33829–33841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhang, T.-T.; Xu, C.-H.; Zhao, W.; Gu, Y.; Li, X.-L.; Xu, J.-J.; Chen, H.-Y. A redox-activated theranostic nanoagent: Toward multi-mode imaging guided chemo-photothermal therapy. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 6749–6757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Fu, N.; Ding, X.; Wu, J.; Li, C.; Wang, Q.; Jiang, J. Cationic Polyelectrolyte Mediated Synthesis of MnO2 -Based Core-Shell Structures as Activatable MRI Theranostic Platform for Tumor Cell Ablation. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2018, 35, 1800078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wan, S.-S.; Cheng, Q.; Zeng, X.; Zhanga, X.-Z. A Mn(III)-Sealed Metal–Organic Framework Nanosystem for Redox-Unlocked Tumor Theranostics. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 6561–6571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, H.; Bremner, D.H.; Wu, K.; Gong, X.; Fan, Q.; Xie, X.; Zhang, H.; Wu, J.; Zhu, L.-M. Platelet membrane biomimetic bufalin-loaded hollow MnO2 nanoparticles for MRI-guided chemo-chemodynamic combined therapy of cancer. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xu, F.; Zhu, J.; Lin, L.; Zhang, C.; Sun, W.; Fan, Y.; Yin, F.; Van Hest, J.C.M.; Wang, H.; Du, L.; et al. Multifunctional PVCL nanogels with redox-responsiveness enable enhanced MR imaging and ultrasound-promoted tumor chemotherapy. Theranostics 2020, 10, 4349–4358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceuticals 14 00069 g001 550
Figure 1. Redox-responsive activatable nanostarshell (RANS). GSH: Glutathione. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [34]—Published by Elsevier.
Figure 1. Redox-responsive activatable nanostarshell (RANS). GSH: Glutathione. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [34]—Published by Elsevier.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00069 g001
Pharmaceuticals 14 00069 g002 550
Figure 2. In vivo T2-weighted imaging (a,d), pseudo-color images (b,e) and coronal magnetic resonance (MR) images (c,f) of C6 tumor-bearing mice. (g,h) Quantification of signals. NIONPs: Non-sensitive superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles; SIONPs: Sensitive superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [35]—Published by Elsevier.
Figure 2. In vivo T2-weighted imaging (a,d), pseudo-color images (b,e) and coronal magnetic resonance (MR) images (c,f) of C6 tumor-bearing mice. (g,h) Quantification of signals. NIONPs: Non-sensitive superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles; SIONPs: Sensitive superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [35]—Published by Elsevier.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00069 g002
Pharmaceuticals 14 00069 g003 550
Figure 3. (A–D) T1-weighted images of saline and caerulein/LPS-treated mice scanned pre- and 6 min post injection of 0.2 mmol/kg Fe2+-PyC3A. (E,F) Contrast to noise ratio (CNR) in pancreas vs. muscle before and 6 min after contrast injection; * p < 0.0001. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [46]—Published by American Chemical Society (ACS).
Figure 3. (A–D) T1-weighted images of saline and caerulein/LPS-treated mice scanned pre- and 6 min post injection of 0.2 mmol/kg Fe2+-PyC3A. (E,F) Contrast to noise ratio (CNR) in pancreas vs. muscle before and 6 min after contrast injection; * p < 0.0001. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [46]—Published by American Chemical Society (ACS).
Pharmaceuticals 14 00069 g003
Pharmaceuticals 14 00069 g004 550
Figure 4. Illustration of activatable interpolymer complex-superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. SPIO: Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles; IPC-SPIO: Interpolymer complex-superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [47]—Published by Elsevier.
Figure 4. Illustration of activatable interpolymer complex-superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. SPIO: Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles; IPC-SPIO: Interpolymer complex-superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [47]—Published by Elsevier.
Pharmaceuticals 14 00069 g004
Pharmaceuticals 14 00069 g005 550
Figure 5. Theranostic redox-responsive mesoporous silica nanoparticles for dual drug delivery and MR imaging. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [53]—Published by American Chemical Society (ACS).
Figure 5. Theranostic redox-responsive mesoporous silica nanoparticles for dual drug delivery and MR imaging. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [53]—Published by American Chemical Society (ACS).
Pharmaceuticals 14 00069 g005
Table
Table 1. Glutathione-sensitive contrast agents.
Table 1. Glutathione-sensitive contrast agents.
MR Contrast Agent CandidateContrast AgentRedox EnvironmentEffect DetectedMultimodalApplication
GdNPs [30]GadoliniumGlutathioneT1 EnhancementNoIn vitro detection of breast cancer cells
RANS [34]Manganese; Iron oxideGlutathioneT1 Enhancement;
T2 Contrast		NoIn vitro/in vivo imaging of gastric cancer
Fe3O4-SS-PEG Gd2O3 [33]Gadolinium; Iron oxideGlutathioneT1 EnhancementNoIn vitro detection of human kidney cancer cells
Redox-activatable fluorescence/19F-MRS/1 H-MR triple-functional probe [35]GadoliniumGlutathioneT1 EnhancementYes; fluorescence/19F-MRS/1H-MRIn vitro imaging of HeLa
mPEG-S-S-C16 [36]Iron oxideGlutathioneT2 ContrastNoIn vivo detection of neuroglioma in mice
MnO2_CQDs [37]ManganeseGlutathione; Hydrogen peroxideT1 EnhancementYes; MR/optical probeIn vitro detection of human epithelial cells
GdNPs-Gal [38]GadoliniumGlutathioneT1 EnhancementYes; 19F-MRS/1H-MRIn vivo imaging of acute hepatitis in mice
Table
Table 2. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-sensitive contrast agents.
Table 2. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-sensitive contrast agents.
MR Contrast Agent CandidateContrast AgentROSEffect DetectedApplication
Gd-5-HT-DOTAGA [45]GadoliniumHydrogen peroxideT1 EnhancementIn vivo detection of inflammation in lungs of bleomycin-injured mice
Fe-PyC3A [46]IronHydrogen peroxideT1 EnhancementIn vivo detection of acute and mild inflammation in mice
IPC-SPIOs [47,48]Iron oxideReactive oxygen species (not specific)T2 ContrastIn vitro imaging of immune cells
Fluorinated bihydrazide Gd-DOTA [49]GadoliniumHypochlorous acidT1 Enhancement; T2 ContrastIn vivo detection of murine hepatocellular carcinoma
IO-Gd NV [50]Iron oxide; GadoliniumInflammatory factorsT1 EnhancementIn vivo detection of murine epithelial cancer cells
Table
Table 3. Redox-sensitive theranostic nanoparticles.
Table 3. Redox-sensitive theranostic nanoparticles.
MR Contrast Agent CandidateContrast AgentRedox EnvironmentEffect DetectedDrugApplication
DOX@MSN-ss-GHA [53]GadoliniumGlutathioneT1 EnhancementDoxorubicinIn vitro imaging of breast cancer cells
SiO2@Au@MnO2–DOX/Apt [54]ManganeseGlutathioneT1 EnhancementDoxorubicin;
Photothermal therapy		In vivo imaging of HeLa bearing mice
Cu2−xSe@MnO2 [55]ManganeseTumor reducing environmentT1 EnhancementPhotothermal therapyIn vivo detection of murine colorectal carcinoma
Mn(III)-TCCP MOF [56]ManganeseGlutathioneT1 EnhancementPhotodynamic therapyIn vitro imaging of breast cancer; In vivo imaging of cancer in BALB/c mice
PLTM-HMnO2 NPs [57]ManganeseGlutathioneT1 EnhancementBufalinIn vivo detection of murine tumor
DOX/MnO2@PVCL NGs [58]ManganeseGlutathioneT1 EnhancementDoxorubicinEarly stage development
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nwasike, C.; Purr, E.; Yoo, E.; Nagi, J.S.; Doiron, A.L. Activatable Nanoparticles: Recent Advances in Redox-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Contrast Agent Candidates Capable of Detecting Inflammation. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14010069

AMA Style

Nwasike C, Purr E, Yoo E, Nagi JS, Doiron AL. Activatable Nanoparticles: Recent Advances in Redox-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Contrast Agent Candidates Capable of Detecting Inflammation. Pharmaceuticals. 2021; 14(1):69. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14010069

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nwasike, Chukwuazam, Erin Purr, Eunsoo Yoo, Jaspreet Singh Nagi, and Amber L. Doiron. 2021. "Activatable Nanoparticles: Recent Advances in Redox-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Contrast Agent Candidates Capable of Detecting Inflammation" Pharmaceuticals 14, no. 1: 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14010069

APA Style

Nwasike, C., Purr, E., Yoo, E., Nagi, J. S., & Doiron, A. L. (2021). Activatable Nanoparticles: Recent Advances in Redox-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Contrast Agent Candidates Capable of Detecting Inflammation. Pharmaceuticals, 14(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14010069

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop