Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Role of Flavonoids in the Interactions among Obesity, Inflammation, and Autophagy
Previous Article in Journal
Examining the Characteristics and Applications of Mesenchymal, Induced Pluripotent, and Embryonic Stem Cells for Tissue Engineering Approaches across the Germ Layers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Regioselective Hydroxylation of Phloretin, a Bioactive Compound from Apples, by Human Cytochrome P450 Enzymes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/ph13110343
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mānuka Oil—A Review of Antimicrobial and Other Medicinal Properties

by
Cynthia Mathew
1,
Wubshet Tesfaye
1,
Phil Rasmussen
2,
Gregory M Peterson
1,3,
Andrew Bartholomaeus
1,4,
Manab Sharma
1 and
Jackson Thomas
1,*
1
Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra 2617, Australia
2
Phytomed Medicinal Herbs Ltd., Auckland 1026, New Zealand
3
Tasmanian School of Pharmacy, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7001, Australia
4
Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13(11), 343; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13110343
Submission received: 14 September 2020 / Revised: 7 October 2020 / Accepted: 9 October 2020 / Published: 26 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Compounds from Plants and Foods with Pharmaceutical Interest)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mānuka oil is an essential oil derived from Leptospermum scoparium, a plant that has been used by the indigenous populations of New Zealand and Australia for centuries. Both the extracted oil and its individual components have been associated with various medicinal properties. Given the rise in resistance to conventional antibiotics, natural products have been targeted for the development of antimicrobials with novel mechanism of action. This review aimed to collate available evidence on the antimicrobial, anti-parasitic and anti-inflammatory activities of mānuka oil and its components. A comprehensive literature search of was conducted using PubMed and Embase (via Scopus) targeting articles from database inception until June 2020. Chemical structures and IUPAC names were sourced from PubChem. Unpublished information from grey literature databases, Google search, targeted websites and Google Patents were also included. The present review found extensive in vitro data supporting the antimicrobial effects of mānuka oil warrants further clinical studies to establish its therapeutic potential. Clinical evidence on its efficacy, safety and dosing guidelines are necessary for its implementation for medical purposes. Further work on regulation, standardization and characterization of the medicinal properties of mānuka oil is required for establishing consistent efficacy of the product.

1. Introduction

Mānuka (Leptospermum scoparium), also known as kahikatoa, red mānuka and tea tree, belongs to the Myrtaceae plant family and is found throughout New Zealand and Australia [1]. Commonly grouped under ‘tea trees,’ which also includes Camellia sinensis, Kunzea ericoides, Leptospermum petersonii and Melaleuca alternifolia, these species have been used by the Māori, the Aboriginals and early European settlers as topical preparations for wounds, cuts, sores and skin diseases and as inhalations for colds and fevers. Interest in the medicinal properties of mānuka, particularly mānuka honey, has grown over the last 30 years. There is also a growing interest in the volatile oil due to its potential application as a medicinal agent or cosmetic ingredient [2,3]. Currently, there has not been a critical review on the efficacy and potential applications of mānuka oil while there have been extensive reviews on Mānuka honey and its medical applications. We aim to bridge this gap through this review, providing an up-to-date summary of recent developments in our understanding of the medicinal activities of mānuka oil as well as its clinical efficacy—and toxicity profile.

2. Search Strategy

Literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase (via Scopus) targeting articles from database inception until June 2020. Key terms like ‘Leptospermum scoparium’ and ‘antimicrobial’ or ‘antibacterial’ or ‘anti-inflammatory’ or ‘antiviral’ were tailored for individual databases to perform the search (a full search strategy is summarized in Appendix A). The retrieved articles were filtered manually to exclude duplicates and then screened using titles, abstracts and full-text articles based on our objectives. Also, bibliographies of included studies were reviewed to check for articles missed during the main search. Chemical structures and IUPAC names were obtained from PubChem. Information was also gathered from grey literature databases, Google search, targeted websites and Google Patents.

2.1. Chemical Composition

Mānuka oil (CAS 219828- 87-2) is a volatile essential oil derived from the foliage, bark and seeds of Leptospermum scoparium plants of the Myrtaceae family of trees and shrubs [4]. A clear liquid with an aromatic odor is produced by a steam distillation process from plants harvested mostly in the autumn, summer and spring, with a yield ranging from 0.2–1%, depending on seasonal and geographical factors [5,6] (also commercial data held by Phytomed Medicinal Herbs Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand). The oil is generally distilled using leaves and young stems, although oil has also been produced from the seeds [5,7]. The use of biowaste fertilizer has recently been reported to enhance oil production and content [8].
A large number of studies have examined the constituents of mānuka oil, which vary depending on the source of the oil [7,9,10] as well as the plant chemotype and season of collection [11]. Overall, 100 components were identified from 16 commercial samples of mānuka oil, of which 51 components made up 95% of the content [7]. The major components of commercially available mānuka oils are reported to be leptospermone (0.8–19.4%), calamenene (2.5–18.5%), δ-cadinene (0.9–6.9%), cadina-1,4-diene (0.1–5.9%), flavesone (0.7–5.8%), cadina-3,5-diene (3.0–10.0%), α-copaene (4.3–6.5%) and α-selinene (1.3–5.0%) (Table 1) [7,9,11,12,13,14]. Chemotypes found in the East Coast of the North Island of New Zealand tend to contain higher levels of β-triketones than oil sourced from other regions [11]. The compartmentalization of β-triketones and grandiflorone within oil glands inside mānuka leaves may defend the plants against mānuka’s herbicidal activity [15]. There are also some types of L. scoparium that are high in α-pinene (21.5%) [11], though the majority of plants possess lower levels of this monoterpene (0.6–11%) [7,9,10,11].
Variation of the components in mānuka oil was found both between and within natural populations of L. scoparium [7,11,16]. Higher levels of triketones (known to have strong antibacterial properties) were predominant in samples from the East Cape population. Higher levels of the monoterpenes, α- and β-pinene, were present in the Northland populations [16]. Samples from L. scoparium grown in Australia had higher monoterpene levels and almost no triketones compared to those from New Zealand [16]. Mānuka oil from New Zealand was shown to have low concentrations of monoterpenes in comparison to kanuka oil (75% α-pinene) and negligible amounts of terpinen-4-ol and 1,8-cineole predominant in Australian tea tree oil [7]. In general, mānuka oils from different geographic locations around New Zealand can be simplified into 3 basic chemo-type groups based on the ratio of the monoterpenes:sesquiterpenes:ß-triketones [29]. These include triketone-rich in the East Cape (marketed as Manex™), monoterpene-, linalool- and eudesmol-rch in Nelson (Kaiteriteri™) and monoterpene- and pinene rich in Canterbury [5,9,16,30]. A varied chemotype in mānuka grown in South Africa in comparison to New Zealand-grown was shown by van Vurren [31]. The age of the plant also plays a role in the nature of the essential oil, with higher sesquiterpene content in young plants and a mixed amount of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes in mature ones [9].
The lack of consistency in constituents is a common problem with natural extracts and a source of inconsistency in medicinal properties [32]. Though mānuka oil is listed under the New Zealand Inventory of chemicals (CAS 219828- 87-2), ECHA (CAS 223749-44-8) and EINECS (425-630-7), further research into regulation, standardization and characterization of the medicinal properties from varying origins is required.

2.2. Medicinal Properties of Mānuka Oil

Mānuka grows abundantly throughout New Zealand and has been a part of traditional Maori medicine for a variety of applications. The bark of the tree has been used for the treatment of skin diseases, as a sedative and as a mouthwash. The leaves are boiled in water for treating colds or crushed and applied to ease itching and scabs, while the leaves have been used as tea, as a febrifuge and for pain relief. The seeds were used for treating dysentery and diarrhea [33,34]. Contemporary data, prominently from in vitro studies, clearly demonstrates a broad spectrum of antibacterial, antifungal, anti-parasitic/insecticidal, anti-inflammatory, antiviral and spasmolytic activity.

2.3. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity of mānuka oil is the most characterized, being effective against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (Table 2). These effects are variable depending on the type and source of the oil, with fractions containing triketone constituents seeming particularly active [10].

2.4. Mechanism of Action

The antibacterial activity of mānuka oil is relatively more pronounced against Gram positive bacteria than Gram negative bacteria (Table 2). The exact mechanism of the antibacterial effects in Gram positive bacteria are unknown but cell lysis of Gram-positive cells suggests disruption of the bacterial cell membrane is an important component of the mechanism. Treatment with 1.5% (v/v) of mānuka oil for 4 h induced morphological changes and cell lysis in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), while treatment with a high dose (3% v/v) completely disrupted the cells [35]. The β-triketone content are suggested to be responsible for this activity [30]. In contrast treatment with mānuka oil against Gram negative bacteria, such as E. coli, caused mild alterations in morphology at low doses and higher concentrations (6% v/v) were required for antibacterial effects [12,35]. The basis of the difference is unknown but this may be due to limited diffusion across the lipopolysaccharide-based capsule covering the outer membrane of Gram negative bacteria [35].

2.5. Gram Positive Bacteria

The efficacy of mānuka oil is both dose- and time-dependent. Treatment with a 10% solution of mānuka oil in DMSO was equally effective as the same concentration of kanuka oil against Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus sobrinus and Staphylococcus mutans (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) = 0.048% (480 µg/mL); the highest dilution at which no growth was observed) [36] (Table 2). A time to kill assay against the same strains showed 100% inhibition on treatment with either 10% mānuka oil or kanuka oil required as low as 5 s and as high as 900 s [37]. Another study determined the MIC value ranging between 0.13–0.25% against S. sobrinus strains and 0.25% against S. mutans [38]. Higher concentrations of essential oils are reported in the case of other antibacterial medicinal products against the same oral pathogens—tea tree (1%), eucalyptus (1%), lavender (>1%) and rosemary (>1%) [38] (Table 2).
Mānuka oil exhibits strong bacteriostatic effects against different strains of Staphylococcus, including antibiotic-resistant strains (Table 2). Treatment with 2% (v/v) mānuka oil, kanuka oil or triketones in Tween 80 had limited bactericidal effects at 240 min post-treatment (using death a kinetics assay) [30]. Mānuka oil has also exhibited strong activity against different strains of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, often contributory to skin and ear infections in dogs [39]. These included methicillin-resistant strains, with MICs being around 2% (v/v) for both resistant- and antibiotic-sensitive isolates [39]. Inhibition of S. pseudintermedius biofilm formation was also reported in the same study [39]. Exposure of various strains of S. aureus to subinhibitory concentrations of mānuka oil has also been found to significantly inhibit their ability to produce enterotoxins, an effect not observed after treatment with oregano and marjoram essential oils [36,40].
Activity against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Propionibacterium acnes, pathogenic bacteria responsible for acne in humans, has also been reported [41,42]. Interestingly, this study also found mānuka oil to show the highest likelihood amongst a range of different essential oil combinations, of being involved in synergist interactions against S. epidermidis [41]. Kim et al. and Wu (2011) have shown reduction in acne and bactericidal effects (MIC = 0.211% w/v or 2.11 mg/mL; MBC = 0.25% w/v or 2.5 mg/mL) of mānuka oil against P. acnes respectively [42,43].
Impressive effects of mānuka oil have been found against pathogenic bacteria associated with biosolid soil contamination, with significant growth inhibition of C. perfringens and L. monocytogenes [44]. The EC50 = 0.07% and 23.3% (environmental effect concentration is the dose required to reduce pathogen growth by 50%) for C. perfringens and L. monocytogenes, respectively, on treatment with concentrated mānuka leaf extract for 24 h [44].
Specific components or fractions of mānuka oil, such as leptospermone (and its derivatives, grandiflorone and myrigalone A), have also been identified to possess antibacterial activity [19,45]. Leptospermone had the strongest inhibitory effect against foodborne Gram positive bacteria, such as Listeria monocytogenes, S. aureus and S. intermedius (Table 2), using both dilution assay and agar diffusion assay (≥30 mm inhibition zone on treatment with 1 and 2 mg/disc) [19]. Leptospermone and its derivative 1,2,3-cyclohexanetrione-1,3-dioxime had strong inhibitory effects against intestinal bacteria, Clostridium difficle and C. perfringens (inhibitory zone ranged between 20 and >30 mm on treatment with 2 or 5 mg/disc) [19]. The derivative 1,2,3-cyclohexanetrione-1,3-dioxime had a strong inhibitory effect against Bifidobacterium breve and B. longum (≥30 mm inhibition zone on treatment with 5 mg/disc) but leptospermum had no effect on these strains. Neither fractions were effective against Lactobacillus casei, a non-pathogenic probiotic [19].
Two other components of typical mānuka oil, grandiflorone (MIC = up to 0.0032% or 32 μg/mL) and myrigalone A (MIC = 0.0064% or 64 μg/mL), have also been identified as active against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VRE) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and may therefore provide potential treatments for infection with these bacterial species [45].

2.6. Gram Negative Bacteria

A comprehensive study of the effects of 60 different essential oils on the growth of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) found mānuka oil to be the seventh most effective antibacterial when diluted in propylene glycol (500 µg/mL after 1 h and 40 µg/mL after 24 h) [46]. Mānuka oil derived from the North Island of New Zealand displayed significant antibacterial activity against 20/20 Listeria monocytogenes strains, whereas more so than that of mānuka oil from the South Island was effective against (0/20 Listeria monocytogenes strains) [28]. Higher levels of β-triketones found in chemotypes growing in the North Island of New Zealand, are likely to be contributory to these differences [11].
Investigation of the growth inhibitory effect of an oil from mānuka seeds against Escherichia coli showed it to be ineffective according to Jeong et al. (2009) while it was effective for Prosser et al. (2014). Based on calorimetric growth experiments using E. coli K12 C600, Jeong et al. (2009) showed that treatment with different doses of mānuka oil dissolved in Tween 80 (up to 4% v/v) had a dose-dependent effect in reducing bacterial growth but was not as effective as treatment with Melaleuca alternifolia oil [47]. On the other hand, Prosser et al. (2014) showed treatment with a very high dose of concentrated mānuka oil inhibited the growth of E. coli 0157 (EC50 = 27.8%). Similar doses were required to inhibit the growth of Salmonella typhimurium. In comparison, treatment with 0.597% of concentrated mānuka oil was sufficient to retard the growth of C. jejuni [44]. This study proposed the potential applications to improve polluted soils and adjacent waterways, through planting mānuka or including mānuka oil when biosolids are applied to the soil to help prevent bacterial contamination [44,48].
Mānuka-derived leptospermone has strong antibacterial activity against Gram negative foodborne bacterial pathogens, Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella flexneri and Shigella sonnei, with MICs ranging from 23.6 to 69.7 μg/mL [49]. These data suggest that leptospermone may be useful clinically or as a natural food preservative, as it is able to inhibit the growth of harmful gut and foodborne bacteria while displaying no significant effect on beneficial bacterial species [49].
Activity against various Gram negative, antibiotic-resistant bacterial isolates from dogs with otitis externa, has also been reported recently for mānuka. These included both antibiotic-sensitive and multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae spp. pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis [50]. MIC and MBC values (minimum bactericidal concentrations) of mānuka oil alone were ≥1% v/v and ≥2%, respectively [50].
Mānuka oil was the most effective against periodontopathic bacteria in comparison to tea tree oil, eucalyptus oil, lavandula oil and romarinus oil. Mānuka oil was effective at very low concentration (MIC = 0.03%) against the oral pathogens A. actinomycetemcomitans (MBC = 0.13%), P. gingivalis (MBC = 0.06; 0.03 for ATCC 53977) and F. nucleatum (MBC = 0.03%). By comparison, higher MIC values very observed for other antibacterial essential oils such as tea tree (0.06–0.5%), eucalyptus (0.13–0.5%), lavender (0.25–1.0%) and rosemary (0.5–1.0%) against the same oral pathogens [38].

2.7. Synergistic Effects

Combining mānuka oil with Tris-EDTA enhanced the antibacterial effects against drug-resistant isolates from dogs with otitis externa, with MIC value ranging from 0.06% to 0.5% and MBC value ranging from 0.06 to 1% [50]. A placebo-controlled study of bacterial pyoderma in dogs examined the effects of combining systemic antibiotics with a topical spray composed of essential oils, including mānuka oil [51]. The results showed a significant improvement in skin healing with the combination of oral antibiotics and essential oil spray, compared to oral antibiotics alone [51].
Similar results highlighting the synergistic effects of mānuka oil were shown by Filoche (2005). The combined effect of chlorhexidine digluconate and a series of essential oils, including mānuka oil, found that mānuka oil inhibited the growth of two cariogenic bacteria, S. mutans and Lactobacillus plantarum, either as liquid cultures or as biofilms [52]. When mānuka oil and chlorhexidine were combined, the authors found an eight-fold reduction in the concentration of chlorhexidine required to achieve the same level of growth inhibition, suggesting the potential for novel anti-caries treatments [52].
Combined treatment with Cananga odorata and mānuka oil had MIC = 0.094% (0.94 mg/mL) and 0.060% (0.60 mg/mL) against acne-causing Propionibacterium acnes (ATCC 11827) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 2223), respectively. In comparison, treatment with each oil individually required higher doses (Table 2) (Orchard, 2018). Combined treatment with mānuka oil and Achillea millefolium or Citrus aurantium var. amara flower (neroli) had MIC = 1.0 mg/mL and 2.0 mg/mL against P. acnes and S. epidermidis, respectively, in the same study [41].

2.8. Antifungal Activity

A summary of the antifungal effects of mānuka oil is given in Table 3. Although the exact mechanism of action is unknown, the essential oil from Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) has been shown to cause damage to the fungal cell wall and cytoplasmic membrane thereby altering the membranes properties and disrupting their functions. Melaleuca oil also causes thinning and distortion of the hyphal wall, causing cell wall disruption and formation of empty hyphal tips that create bud-like structures [54].
Moderate rate of inhibition of phytopathogenic fungi Phytophthora cactorum (28 × 103 mg/mL air), Cryphonectria parasitica (14 × 103 mg/mL air) and Fusarium circinatum (7 × 103 mg/mL air) was revealed fumigant assay [55]. When the fungi were exposed to mānuka oil as a fumigant, the inhibition rate was 50% against P. cactorum and 62% against F. circinatum; however, no inhibition was observed against C. parasitica [55].
The effect of mānuka oil on Aspergillus niger, A. ochraceous and F. culmorum was assessed in another study, which found wide variation in the antifungal activity depending on the source of mānuka oil; the mānuka oil sample from the South Island of New Zealand had greater antifungal activity against A. ochraceus and F. culmorum than mānuka oil from the North Island [28]. The fungicidal activity of mānuka oil was assessed for a series of human fungal species, Malassezia furfur, Trichosporon mucoides, Candida albicans and C. tropicalis, with a MIC of 1.56% for M. furfur and T. mucoides and 3.13% for both Candida species [37]. Good activity against Candida species was also reported in a subsequent study [56].

2.9. Antiparasitic/Insecticidal Activity

Several studies have examined the antiparasitic activity of mānuka oil, for parasites with significant impact on plants, humans and animals (Table 4). The primary animal parasites under investigation have been poultry red mites (Dermanyssus gallinae), while the primary human parasites investigated have been scabies (Sarcoptes scabei), house dust mites (Dermatophagoides farina and D. pteronyssinus), stored product mites (Tyrophagus putrescentiae) and mosquitos (Aedes aegypti). The adsorption of the active ingredients in the oil are suggested to cause fumigant and/or contact toxicity in the parasites. Contact and fumigation assays are generally used to determine the antiparasitic efficacy of essential oils. The compound efficacy would therefore depend on their lipophilic nature, viscosity and vapor pressure. In contact bioassays, lipophilic and viscous compounds are commonly more effective as they penetrate the cuticle layer of the arthropod. In fumigation bioassays, the toxic compounds are inhaled via the respiratory system and are dependent on the vapor pressure exerted by the compound [57].
A study of the effect of mānuka oil on different life stages of D. gallinae suggests it is effective against both adult and juvenile mites but that it is not ovicidal for this parasite [58]. A study of the effect of mānuka oil on D. gallinae found the lethal concentration required to kill 50% of the parasites (LC50) during a 24-h period in a contact bioassay was ~0.05 mg/cm3 and 0.03 mg/cm3 [58]. Mānuka oil displayed a repelling effect on >75% of D. gallinae mites for up to 4 days after treatment of the mites contained in the Y-tube of an olfactometer and exposed to either fresh air in one arm of the Y-tube or air containing the volatile components of each essential oil in the other arm [59,62].
The effect of mānuka oil on a poultry beetle (Tenebrio molitor), a beneficial insect in a poultry system, was assessed along with a non-target organism. In this case, the mānuka oil had no significant effect on beetle mortality compared to the control (~15% vs. ~5%, respectively) [62]. Similar results for T. molitor exposure to mānuka oil were observed in another study [59]. In contrast, exposure of brine shrimp (Artemia salina, an organism commonly used in toxicity testing) to mānuka oil revealed a 90% mortality rate after exposure to ~0.05 mg/cm3, the same concentration as the LC50 for D. gallinae [59], indicating potential use of mānuka oil as a general acaricide may need careful consideration regarding the effect on non-target organisms.
Mānuka seed oil appears to be effective against house dust (D. farina and D. pteronyssinus) and stored product mites (Tyrophagus putrescentiae), with a LD50 (dose required to kill half the members of a tested population after a specified test duration) values of 0.54, 0.67 and 1.21 µg/cm2, respectively, against the stated parasites; these values are 11.5–68.7 times more effective than DEET (N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide), a common chemical treatment to control these mites [20]. Further analysis of the major components of mānuka seed oil indicated the main triketone, leptospermone, to be the most active component of mānuka oil in this study, with LD50 values of 0.07–0.15 ug/cm2 against D. farina, D. pteronyssinus and T. putrescentiae; these values represent 92.6–530.3 times the toxicity of DEET against the same organisms [20].
A study of the effects of essential oils on human scabies mites (Sarcoptes scabei) found mānuka oil to be moderately effective against the mites, with median lethal times of 30 min (± 7.5 min) after direct contact with a 10% manuka oil solution in paraffin oil. Vapor phase toxicity of mānuka oil was determined via fumigation assay, where mites were exposed to a filter paper treated with mānuka oil and mortality was checked every 5 min. Median lethal time for undiluted mānuka oil was 23 min (± 8.7 min) [14].
Insecticidal activity for mānuka oil has also been reported against Drosophila suzukii, a fruit fly pest which is a serious economic threat to soft summer fruit. Mānuka oil’s LD50 for contact toxicity was 0.60 μg/mL for males and 1.10 for females. Triketone components were shown to be contributory to these insecticidal effects [60].
Mānuka oil has also been used as a lure to attract Xyleborus glabratus (Redbay ambrosia beetle), an exotic wood-borer that transmits the fungal agent (Raffaelea lauricola) responsible for laurel wilt, which has had a severe impact on forest ecosystems in South-East United States [63,64].
Screening of essential oils for their toxicity against Aedes aegypti (L.) larvae found that mānuka oil containing calamenene and leptospermone as dominant constituents, exhibited strong larvicidal effects. This suggests potential applications for mānuka oil in mosquito vector control. These effects were enhanced when mānuka oil was combined with carvacrol or oregano oil [61] and with an emulsion made using amylose-N-1-hexadecylammonium chloride [21].

2.10. Anti-Inflammatory Effects

Experiments to assess the anti-inflammatory potential of mānuka oil found that THP-1 cells stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and co-treated with 0.1–10% mānuka oil had significantly reduced release of TNF-α but there was no significant effect on the release of IL-4 [37]. This study found no cellular toxicity at an oil concentration of 10%, which contrasts with the results discussed in the toxicity section earlier. The diluent used in the study by Chen et al. was not specified and this discrepancy could be a result of diluting the lipophilic mānuka oil in aqueous cell culture media. Lis-Balchin et al. (2000) also showed the antioxidant effects of mānuka oil from the North- and South-islands of New Zealand were more consistent in comparison to kanuka oil [28].

2.11. Photo-Protective Effects

Solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation is the primary environmental factor causing skin damage and consequently premature aging. Kwon et al. (2013) evaluated mānuka oil (from Coast Biologicals Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand) for its effects against photoaging in UV-B-irradiated hairless mice. After 8 weeks of exposure to UVB radiation, mice that were treated topically with 10% mānuka oil experienced a reduction in typical UVB-related skin changes, such as skin thickening, appearance of wrinkles and loss of skin collagen [65]. These effects were associated with inhibition of loss of collagen fibers, reduction of epidermal hyperplasia, suppressed production of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) and reduced macrophage infiltration, suggesting mānuka oil can inhibit UVB-associated inflammation in skin [65].
A nanoemulsion (particle size of 11.93 µm) containing mānuka oil (10% by weight) as the main component along with a Vitamin C derivative (ascorbyl tetraisopalmitate; 2% to 10% by weight) has been used in cosmetic formulations, including skin creams, lotions, essences and cosmetic powders [66]. The versatile formulation is effective as a whitening, anti-inflammatory agent and for wrinkle improvement [66]. Treatment for 9 weeks with the mānuka oil-Vitamin C derivative nanoemulsion in SKH-1 Hairless Mice exposed to artificial photoaging using UV-B irradiation showed increased thickness of the skin within 6 to 8 weeks post-treatment while the control showed no change.

2.12. Antiviral Activity

Herpes simplex viruses can cause cold sores (usually Herpes simplex virus type 1, HSV-1) or genital herpes (usually Herpes simplex virus type 2, HSV-2) and both can become chronic and recurrent infections sometimes resistant to antiviral drugs [67]. Pre-treatment with a β-triketone-rich mānuka oil has been reported to exhibit inhibitory effects on HSV-1 and HSV-2 [23,68,69]. RC-37 cells (monkey kidney cells) or the viruses were pre-treated with mānuka oil for one hour followed by inoculation. Pre-treatment of the virus with the oil significantly inhibited plaque formation in comparison to pre-treatment of the cells alone [23]. The IC50 against HSV-1 was 0.96 µg/mL (0.0001% v/v) and that for HSV-2 was 0.587 μg/mL (0.00006% v/v) [23]. Pre-treatment of host cells before viral infection reduced replication of HSV-1 by 41%. Treatment with flavesone and leptospermone alone, two characteristic triketone constituents of mānuka oil, had similar effects [23]. Another study reported pre-treatment of acyclovir-resistant isolates of HSV-1 and HSV-2 with 0.001% mānuka oil reduced the infectivity of the viruses by >99% [69,70]. The absence of viral inhibition in pre-treated cells suggests that the oil is likely to exert a direct antiviral effect on HSV before or during adsorption onto the host cells [23,69,70].

2.13. Spasmolytic Activity

Smooth muscle spasmolytic activity has been reported for mānuka oil in experiments on guinea pig ileum showing a dose-dependent inhibitory effect of mānuka oil on smooth muscle contractions [71]. A subsequent study of the components of mānuka oil showed α-terpineol and terpinene-4-ol both produce strong spasmolytic activity in guinea pig ileum, while in contrast, α- and γ-terpinenes displayed spasmolytic activity after an initial spasmogenic action [28]. A post-synaptic mechanism affecting cAMP to alter potassium channels in the muscle was suggested by the authors as the possible mode of action [28]. This activity was absent in kanuka oil and neither mānuka or kanuka oil used cGMP nor behave like potassium channel openers (seen in Melaleuca (tea tree) oil).
Mānuka oil and its components were also reported to increase muscle tone in skeletal muscle, evaluating its absorption in chick biventer muscle and rat phrenic nerve diaphragm preparations [28]. In contrast, both mānuka oil and Melaleuca oil decreased uterine muscle contractions. Application of either oils showed a decrease in tension (via inhibition of twitch response on stimulating the skeletal muscle nerve) and a weighty increase in resting tone (indicating contracture) when the muscle was stimulated either directly or via the phrenic nerve. the components α-terpineol, α-terpinene and terpinene-4-ol showing a similar, significant decrease in the force of contractions [28]. The study suggests the use of these oils for aromatherapy, where they would aid as relaxants for those suffering from stress and anxiety. While these studies involved relatively high doses of a limited number of mānuka oil samples, whose origins and chemotypes were not well characterized, to isolated tissues in vitro [28]. The researchers highlighted caution against the use of mānuka oil as a relaxant during childbirth may be detrimental to the birthing process and should therefore be avoided in this situation [28]. This suggestion was based on similar properties exhibited by tea tree oil and other essential oils [28,72].

2.14. Safety and Tolerance

Mānuka oil, like other essential oils, has been classified as safe and tolerable for human use (CAS (US and EU) 223749-44-8; CTFA monograph ID 10572 and EINECS 425-630-7). However, the lack of clinical trials means there is limited data to inform dosing practices and toxicology profiles. The in vitro toxicity of mānuka oil and its main constituent, leptospermone, tended to vary with cell lines, concentrations tested and method of analysis (Table 5). Higher cytotoxicity was observed on treatment with mānuka oil in comparison to leptospermone alone. This suggests additional components of mānuka oil that makes it more toxic to cell lines. A study of mānuka oil in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) found treatment with a concentration of 0.2% of mānuka oil reduced cell viability by ~30% [38]. Given mānuka oil is lipophilic and cannot be diluted in aqueous cell culture media [69], it is possible the actual concentration of mānuka oil in contact with the HUVEC cultures was significantly less than assumed.
No signs of toxicity were observed on treatment with 10% active aqueous or oily phase of the cosmetic formulation for Campo Mānuka Oil Extract in fibroblast cells. In vitro organogenesis assay (Living Dermal Matrix (LDM)), a toxicity assay that closely mimics the effect of a substance on human skin, consists of skin cells in a 3D-construct made of collagen. The LDM test proved Campo Mānuka oil to be non-irritant with 99.4% cell viability after treatment with an undiluted sample in comparison to 100% propylene glycol (73%; a non-irritant) and 100% morpholine (6%; a moderate irritant) [73].
Unpublished data showed gel formulations containing >10% mānuka oil did not induce acute skin sensitivity in mice (unpublished data Phytomed Medicinal Herbs Ltd.). Acute toxicity was not observed (LD50 = 4612 g/kg) in mice after single oral administration of varying doses (500 mg/kg to 5000 mg/kg) of a patented formulation containing a mix of Leptospermum scoparium and Kunzea ericoides essential oils. The same formulation did not induce erythema or edema 3 and 7 days after a skin irritation test in epilated rabbits treated with 0.5 g of the product. Absence of percutaneous irritation was also demonstrated after treatment with 0.1 mL of 10% emulsion of the combined oil product onto the eyes of rabbits treated up to 7 days [74].
Product safety report on MELORA™ Mānuka oil (<5%) according to EC Regulation 1223/2009 detailed high skin tolerance and good cosmetic acceptability of the product. The formulation has a relatively high content of β-triketones, such as flavesone, isoleptospermone, leptospermone and grandiflorone. Acute toxicities based on the routes of administration were LD50 = 1061 mg/kg body weight and LD50 > 2000 mg/kg body weight for oral and dermal administration, respectively. No irritation was noted on testing the formulation on rabbit eye mucous membranes. There was no skin sensitization or genetic toxicity after a micronucleus test in TK6 Human lymphoblastoid cells and bacterial reverse mutation test in Salmonella typhimurium and E. coli. It is intended for external use, could cause irritations in the eye on direct contact and a patch test is suggested before use [6].
The safety evaluations for Campo™ Mānuka Oil Extract (10% concentrate in water or ceramide) formulation according to EC regulations described that the oil was non-toxic for dermal use and was edible in small quantities (oral LD50 = >9000 mg/kg body weight) after testing in rats. The formulation was classified as a non-irritant based on tests in vivo and in healthy human subjects. Patch tests in 50 healthy human subjects at doses from 0.5% to 100% showed satisfactory tolerance with no significant irritation reactions [73]. The irritation potential of a 10% solution of mānuka oil was tested on the chorio-allantoic membrane of chicken egg, using the Eyetex assay and Skintex assay. All three tests deemed the formulation as non-irritant. The product did not have any comedogenic effect on the skin, indicating that the product does not clog pores and is well tolerated on the skin [73].
Manuka oil sample pre-registered by the ECHA (EC Number: 434-370-3) was found to have LD50: 1.061 mg/kg body weight (95% CI: 722–1.557) for oral administration and LD50 >2000 mg/kg body weight. Low scores for erythema and edema were determined for skin irritation and eye irritation tests in vivo.
Mānuka oil is an active ingredient in the TGA-listed product Kiwiherb Herbal Throat Spray (ARTG ID 337576), which contains a mixture of Echinacea purpurea (6%), honey (7%), mānuka oil (1 µL/mL), Macropiper excelsum var. excelsum (7%), propolis tincture (0.09 µg/mL and Thymus vulgaris (5%). The formulation is accepted in Australia by TGA for oral administration to reduce or relieve cold, cough, dry throat, mild throat inflammation, itchy throat and pharyngitis [75].

3. Future Directions

Mānuka oil has been extensively used in traditional medicinal preparations and its individual fractions, particularly β-triketone constituents, exhibit many bioactive properties. Yet its application in clinical medicine remains under explored. The emergence of new strains of pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, parasites and fungi, coupled with the continued rise in antibiotic resistance, warrants further study of the potential antimicrobial activity of essential oils as therapeutic agents for their control and eradication. In contrast to tea tree oil, there is limited evidence on the efficacy and safety of mānuka oil in terms of geographic origin, parts of the plant used, dilutions and variation among formulations. The elucidated mechanisms of action exerted by topical application of mānuka oil are general to those of essential oils. Further reproducible studies looking into the mechanistic and lethal action of mānuka oil as well as its fractions are required to accurately compare efficacy between formulations and sources of the oil. Future studies on the synergistic efficacy of mānuka oil with synthetic drugs or other essential oils could improve its efficacy against pathogen, for instance Gram negative bacteria. In vivo studies on the medicinal properties of mānuka oil could inform therapeutic and interventional clinical trials. Additionally, there is a clear need for standardization of manuka oil (e.g., the International Organization for Standardization [ISO] and Association Française de Normalization [AFNOR] for quality specification of key bioactive terpene components) to meet the growing needs of therapeutic grade product.

4. Conclusions

With emerging resistance to drug-based antimicrobial and anti-parasitic treatments, as well as a growing interest in alternative therapies, the extensive in vitro data supporting the medicinal properties of mānuka oil warrant further clinical studies to characterize its true therapeutic benefits. Commercialization and therapeutic application of mānuka oil requires extensive regulation and standardization of the oil and clinical evidence for its medicinal properties. The review highlights an underutilized essential oil with potential medical applications similar to tea tree oil and mānuka honey. Further characterization of antimicrobial activity of manuka oil will clearly improve its potential to become a clinically useful product. The current in vitro data suggest that manuka oil products may have efficacy in the treatment of many cutaneous skin infections. These data also provide a sound basis from which to proceed to in vivo and clinical work—which is critical in translating early laboratory findings into clinically useful outcomes.
Since the mechanism of action has implications for the selectivity and safety of antimicrobial agents, this issue is becoming increasingly important. Despite growing interest in the oil for therapeutic purposes, the current data remains limited, highlighting the need for further research to understand how manuka oil works. There is enormous potential to expand the manuka oil industry if claims about its medicinal properties are to be verified. Scientific validation regarding the antimicrobial activity of manuka oil may assist in accessing of international markets and the registration of the oil with national regulatory bodies.

Author Contributions

C.M.: Writing-Original draft and table preparation. W.T., G.M.P., A.B., and M.S.: Reviewing and Editing. P.R.: Reviewing and Editing. J.T.: Conceptualization, editing, reviewing and Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The review did not receive any external funding.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Faculty of Health, University of Canberra and Phytomed Medicinal Herbs Ltd., New Zealand.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ECHAEuropean Chemicals Agency
MICMinimum inhibitory concentrations
MBCMinimum Bactericidal Concentration
EINECSEuropean Inventory of Existing Commercial chemical Substances
% v/vvolume per volume
VREvancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis
MRSAmethicillin-resistant S. aureus
ATCCAmerican Type Culture Collection
EDTAEthylenediaminetetraacetic acid
LC50lethal concentration required to kill 50% of the parasites
LD50dose required to kill half the members of a tested population after a specified test duration
LPSlipopolysaccharide
TNF-αTumor necrosis factor alpha
ILInterleukin
UVultraviolet
HSVHerpes simplex virus
IC50half maximal inhibitory concentration
USUnited States of America
EUEuropean Union
CTFACosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association
HUVEChuman umbilical vein endothelial cells
LDMLiving Dermal Matrix
3Dthree-dimensional
ARTGAustralian Register of Therapeutic Goods.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Search Strategy for PubMed and Embase (Via Scopus).
Table A1. Search Strategy for PubMed and Embase (Via Scopus).
PubMedSearch Strategies
#1(“leptospermum”[MeSH Terms] OR “leptospermum”[All Fields]) OR “leptospermums scoparium”[All Fields]) OR (“manuka”[All Fields] AND “oil”[All Fields])) OR ((“tea tree oil”[MeSH Terms] OR “tea tree oil”[All Fields] NOT (honey) [All Fields])
#2((“antifungal”[All Fields]) OR ((((((“anti-infective agents” OR “anti-infective agents”[MeSH Terms]) OR “anti-infective agents”[All Fields]) OR “antimicrobial”[All Fields]) OR “anti-microbial”[All Fields]) OR “antimicrobials”[All Fields] OR anti-inflammatory OR anti-inflammatory OR antiviral OR anti-viral OR “anti-viral agents”))
#3#1 AND #2
Embase (via Scopus)
#1leptospermum OR “leptospermums scoparium” OR “manuka oil” OR “tea tree oil” OR “tea tree” NOT “honey”
#2“anti-infective agents” OR antibacterial OR “antibacterial agent” OR “anti-infective agents” OR “anti-infective agents” OR “antimicrobial” OR “anti-microbial” OR “antimicrobials” OR anti-inflammatory OR anti-inflammatory OR antiviral OR anti-viral OR “anti-viral agents”
#3#1 AND #2

References

  1. Wilson, P.G.; O’Brien, M.M.; Gadek, P.A.; Quinn, C.J.; Quinn, P.A.G.J. Myrtaceae revisited: A reassessment of infrafamilial groups. Am. J. Bot. 2001, 88, 2013–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Maddocks-Jennings, W.; Wilkinson, J.M.; Cavanagh, H.; Shillington, D. Evaluating the effects of the essential oils Leptospermum scoparium (manuka) and Kunzea ericoides (kanuka) on radiotherapy induced mucositis: A randomized, placebo controlled feasibility study. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2009, 13, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Carson, C.F.; Riley, T.V. Safety, efficacy and provenance of tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) oil. Contact Dermat. 2001, 45, 65–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Avonto, C.; Chittiboyina, A.G.; Wang, M.; Vasquez, Y.; Rua, D.; A Khan, I. In Chemico Evaluation of Tea Tree Essential Oils as Skin Sensitizers: Impact of the Chemical Composition on Aging and Generation of Reactive Species. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2016, 29, 1108–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Broadsheet, C.F.R. Essential Oil Production from Manuka & Kanuka. Available online: https://tararuacropping.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/essential-oil-manuka-may-2014_kanuka.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2020).
  6. Melora. Cosmetic Product Safety Report: MELORA™ Mānuka Oil; Melora: Dublin, Ireland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. Christoph, F.; Kubeczka, K.-H.; Stahl-Biskup, E. The Composition of Commercial Manuka Oils from New Zealand. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1999, 11, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Seyedalikhani, S.; Esperschuetz, J.; Dickinson, N.; Hofmann, R.; Breitmeyer, J.; Horswell, J.; Robinson, B. Biowastes to augment the essential oil production of Leptospermum scoparium and Kunzea robusta in low-fertility soil. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 137, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Porter, N.G.; Smale, P.E.; Nelson, M.A.; Hay, A.J.; Van Klink, J.W.; Dean, C.M. Variability in essential oil chemistry and plant morphology within aLeptospermum scopariumpopulation. N. Z. J. Bot. 1998, 36, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Porter, N.G.; Wilkins, A.L. Chemical, physical and antimicrobial properties of essential oils of Leptospermum scoparium and Kunzea ericoides. Phytochemistry 1999, 50, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Douglas, M.H.; Van Klink, J.W.; Smallfield, B.M.; Perry, N.B.; Anderson, R.E.; Johnstone, P.; Weavers, R.T. Essential oils from New Zealand manuka: Triketone and other chemotypes of Leptospermum scoparium. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 1255–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Christoph, F.; Kaulfers, P.M.; Stahl-Biskup, E. In vitro evaluation of the antibacterial activity of β-triketones admixed to Melaleuca oils. Planta Med. 2001, 67, 768–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Christoph, F.; Stahl-Biskup, E.; Kaulfers, P.M. Death Kinetics of Staphylococcus aureus Exposed to Commercial Tea Tree Oils s.l. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2001, 13, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fang, F.; Candy, K.; Melloul, E.; Bernigaud, C.; Chai, L.; Darmon, C.; Durand, R.; Botterel, F.; Chosidow, O.; Izri, A.; et al. In vitro activity of ten essential oils against Sarcoptes scabiei. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Killeen, D.P.; Van Klink, J.W.; Smallfield, B.M.; Gordon, K.C.; Perry, N.B. Herbicidal β-triketones are compartmentalized in leaves of Leptospermumspecies: Localization by Raman microscopy and rapid screening. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Perry, N.B.; Brennan, N.J.; Van Klink, J.W.; Harris, W.; Douglas, M.H.; McGimpsey, J.A.; Smallfield, B.M.; Anderson, R.E. Essential oils from New Zealand manuka and kanuka: Chemotaxonomy of Leptospermum. Phytochemistry 1997, 44, 1485–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Perry, N.B.; Van Klink, J.W.; Brennan, N.J.; Harris, W.; Anderson, R.E.; Douglas, M.H.; Smallfield, B.M. Essential oils from new zealand manuka and kanuka: Chemotaxonomy of kunzea. Phytochemistry 1997, 45, 1605–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dayan, F.E.; Howell, J.L.; Marais, J.P.; Ferreira, D.; Koivunen, M. Manuka Oil, A Natural Herbicide with Preemergence Activity. Weed Sci. 2011, 59, 464–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jeong, E.Y.; Jeon, J.H.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, M.G.; Lee, H.S. Antimicrobial activity of leptospermone and its derivatives against human intestinal bacteria. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 1401–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jeong, E.Y.; Kim, M.G.; Lee, H.S. Acaricidal activity of triketone analogues derived fromLeptospermum scopariumoil against house-dust and stored-food mites. Pest Manag. Sci. 2009, 65, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Muturi, E.J.; Selling, G.W.; Doll, K.M.; Hay, W.T.; Ramirez, J.L. Leptospermum scoparium essential oil is a promising source of mosquito larvicide and its toxicity is enhanced by a biobased emulsifier. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e229076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Govindarajan, M.; Rajeswary, M.; Benelli, G. δ-Cadinene, Calarene and δ-4-Carene from Kadsura heteroclita Essential Oil as Novel Larvicides Against Malaria, Dengue and Filariasis Mosquitoes. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2016, 19, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Reichling, J.; Koch, C.; Stahl-Biskup, E.; Sojka, C.; Schnitzler, P. Virucidal Activity of a β-Triketone-Rich Essential Oil ofLeptospermum scoparium (Manuka Oil) Against HSV-1 and HSV-2 in Cell Culture. Planta Med. 2005, 71, 1123–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shelly, T.E.; Cowan, A.N.; Edu, J.; Pahio, E. Mating success of male Mediterranean fruit flies following exposure to two sources of alpha-copaene, manuka oil and mango. Fla. Entomol. 2008, 91, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hanula, J.L.; Mayfield, A.E., III; Reid, L.S.; Horn, S. Influence of trap distance from a source population and multiple traps on captures and attack densities of the redbay ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). J. Econol. Entomol. 2016, 109, 1196–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Kong, Q.; Zhang, L.; An, P.; Qi, J.; Yu, X.; Lu, J.; Ren, X. Antifungal mechanisms of α-terpineol and terpene-4-alcohol as the critical components of Melaleuca alternifolia oil in the inhibition of rot disease caused by Aspergillus ochraceus in postharvest grapes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 126, 1161–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Nogueira, M.N.M.; Aquino, S.G.; Rossa Junior, C.; Spolidorio, D.M.P. Terpinen-4-ol and alpha-terpineol (tea tree oil components) inhibit the production of IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10 on human macrophages. Inflamm. Res. 2014, 63, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lis-Balchin, M.; Hart, S.L.; Deans, S.G. Pharmacological and antimicrobial studies on different tea-tree oils (Melaleuca alternifolia, Leptospermum scoparium or Manuka and Kunzea ericoides or Kanuka), originating in Australia and New Zealand. Phytotherapy Res. 2000, 14, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Manuka Oil Beta Troketones. Manuka Essential Oil. Available online: http://www.mbtk.org.nz/what-msstk/manuka-essential-oil/ (accessed on 23 June 2020).
  30. Christoph, F.; Kaulfers, P.-M.; Stahl-Biskup, E. A Comparative Study of the in vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Tea Tree Oils s.l. with Special Reference to the Activity of β-Triketones. Planta Med. 2000, 66, 556–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Van Vuuren, S.; Docrat, Y.; Kamatou, G.; Viljoen, A.M. Essential oil composition and antimicrobial interactions of understudied tea tree species. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2014, 92, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Bent, S. Herbal Medicine in the United States: Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Regulation: Grand Rounds at University of California, San Francisco Medical Center. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2008, 23, 854–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Māori Medicine. Available online: https://www.tepapa.govt.nz/discover-collections/read-watch-play/maori/maori-medicine (accessed on 23 June 2020).
  34. Plant Use Details: Leptospermum scoparium. Mānuka. Kahikatoa. Available online: https://maoriplantuse.landcareresearch.co.nz/WebForms/PeoplePlantsDetails.aspx?PKey=34969a5f-698d-437d-8a84-c71dd21351a5 (accessed on 23 June 2020).
  35. Alnaimat, S.; Wainwright, M.; Jaber, S.; Amasha, R. Mechanism of the Antibacterial Action of (Leptospermum scoparium) Oil on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)and E. coli). In Proceedings of the 2nd Mediterranean Symposium on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (MESMAP-2), Antalya, Turkey, 22–25 April 2015. [Google Scholar]
  36. Fratini, F.; Mancini, S.; Turchi, B.; Friscia, E.; Pistelli, L.; Giusti, G.; Cerri, D. A novel interpretation of the Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index: The case Origanum vulgare L. and Leptospermum scoparium J.R. et G. Forst essential oils against Staphylococcus aureus strains. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 195, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chen, C.C.; Yan, S.H.; Yen, M.Y.; Wu, P.F.; Liao, W.T.; Huang, T.S.; Wen, Z.H.; Wang, H.M.D. Investigations of kanuka and manuka essential oils for in vitro treatment of disease and cellular inflammation caused by infectious microorganisms. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2016, 49, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Takarada, K.; Kimizuka, R.; Takahashi, N.; Honma, K.; Okuda, K.; Kato, T. A comparison of the antibacterial efficacies of essential oils against oral pathogens. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2004, 19, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Song, C.Y.; Nam, E.H.; Park, S.H.; Hwang, C.Y. In vitroefficacy of the essential oil fromLeptospermum scoparium(manuka) on antimicrobial susceptibility and biofilm formation inStaphylococcus pseudintermediusisolates from dogs. Veter Dermatol. 2013, 24, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Turchi, B.; Mancini, S.; Pistelli, L.; Najar, B.; Fratini, F. Sub-inhibitory concentration of essential oils induces antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 1509–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Orchard, A.; Van Vuuren, S.; Viljoen, A.M.; Kamatou, G.P.P. The in vitro antimicrobial evaluation of commercial essential oils and their combinations against acne. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2018, 40, 226–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kim, H.; Lee, H.; Lee, J.; Joo, C.; Choe, T. The effects of antimicrobial properties of manuka oil and improvement of acne. J. Korean Soc. Cosmetol. 2011, 17, 245–256. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wu, Q.; Wu, Q. Antimicrobial Effect of Manuka Honey and Kanuka Honey Alone and in Combination with the Bioactives Against the Growth of Propionibacterium Acnes ATCC 6919. Master’s Thesis, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand, June 2011. [Google Scholar]
  44. Prosser, J.; Anderson, C.; Horswell, J.; Speir, T. Can manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) antimicrobial properties be utilised in the remediation of pathogen contaminated land? Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 75, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Killeen, D.P.; Larsen, L.; Dayan, F.E.; Gordon, K.C.; Perry, N.B.; Van Klink, J.W. Nortriketones: Antimicrobial Trimethylated Acylphloroglucinols from Mānuka (Leptospermum scoparium). J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 564–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bergonzelli, G.; Donnicola, D.; Porta, N.; Corthésy-TheulazI, E. Essential Oils as Components of a Diet-Based Approach to Management of Helicobacter Infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 3240–3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Schmolz, E.; Doebner, R.; Auste, R.; Daum, R.; Welge, G.; Lamprecht, I. Bioenergetic investigations on tea-tree and related essential oils. Thermochim. Acta 1999, 337, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Prosser, J.; Woods, R.; Horswell, J.; Robinson, B. The potential in-situ antimicrobial ability of Myrtaceae plant species on pathogens in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 96, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jeong, E.Y.; Lee, M.J.; Lee, H.S. Antimicrobial activities of leptospermone isolated from Leptospermum scoparium seeds and structure-activity relationships of its derivatives against foodborne bacteria. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 27, 1541–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Song, S.; Hyun, J.; Kang, J.H.; Hwang, C.Y. In vitro antibacterial activity of the manuka essential oil from Leptospermum scoparium combined with Tris-EDTA against Gram-negative bacterial isolates from dogs with otitis externa. Veter Dermatol. 2020, 31, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Bensignor, E.; Fabriès, L.; Bailleux, L. A split-body, randomized, blinded study to evaluate the efficacy of a topical spray composed of essential oils and essential fatty acids from plant extracts with antimicrobial properties. Veter Dermatol. 2016, 27, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Filoche, S.K.; Soma, K.; Sissons, C.H. Antimicrobial effects of essential oils in combination with chlorhexidine digluconate. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2005, 20, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schwiertz, A.; Duttke, C.; Hild, J.; Müller, H.J. In vitro activity of essential oils on microorganisms isolated from vaginal infections. Int. J. Aromatherapy 2006, 16, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hammer, K.; Carson, C.F.; Riley, T.V. Antifungal effects of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil and its components on Candida albicans, Candida glabrata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004, 53, 1081–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lee, Y.S.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.G.; Oh, E.; Shin, S.C.; Park, I.K. Effects of plant essential oils and components from Oriental sweetgum (Liquidambar orientalis) on growth and morphogenesis of three phytopathogenic fungi. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2009, 93, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Elisa, B.; Aldo, A.; Ludovica, G.; Viviana, P.; Debora, B.; Massa, N.; Giorgia, N.; Elisa, G. Chemical composition and antimycotic activity of six essential oils (cumin, fennel, manuka, sweet orange, cedar and juniper) against different Candida spp. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 11, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gonzalez-Audino, P.; Picollo, M.I.; Gallardo, A.; Toloza, A.; Vassena, C.; Cueto, G.M. Comparative toxicity of oxygenated monoterpenoids in experimental hydroalcoholic lotions to permethrin-resistant adult head lice. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2010, 303, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. George, D.R.; Sparagano, O.A.E.; Port, G.; Okello, E.; Shiel, R.S.; Guy, J.H. Environmental interactions with the toxicity of plant essential oils to the poultry red miteDermanyssus gallinae. Med. Veter Entomol. 2010, 24, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. George, D.R.; Sparagano, O.A.E.; Port, G.; Okello, E.; Shiel, R.S.; Guy, J.H. Toxicity of plant essential oils to different life stages of the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae, and non-target invertebrates. Med. Veter Entomol. 2010, 24, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Park, C.G.; Jang, M.; Shin, E.; Kim, J. Myrtaceae Plant Essential Oils and their β-Triketone Components as Insecticides against Drosophila suzukii. Molecules 2017, 22, 1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Muturi, E.J.; Ramirez, J.L.; Doll, K.M.; Bowman, M.J. Combined Toxicity of Three Essential Oils Against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Larvae. J. Med. Entomol. 2017, 54, 1684–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. George, D.R.; Sparagano, O.A.E.; Port, G.; Okello, E.; Shiel, R.; Guy, J. Repellence of plant essential oils to Dermanyssus gallinae and toxicity to the non-target invertebrate Tenebrio molitor. Veter Parasitol. 2009, 162, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kendra, P.E.; Montgomery, W.S.; Niogret, J.; Deyrup, M.A.; Guillén, L.; Epsky, N.D. Xyleborus glabratus, X. affinis, and X. ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae): Electroantennogram Responses to Host-Based Attractants and Temporal Patterns in Host-Seeking Flight. Environ. Entomol. 2012, 41, 1597–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hanula, J.L.; Sullivan, B.T.; Wakarchuk, D. Variation in Manuka Oil Lure Efficacy for CapturingXyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), and Cubeb Oil as an Alternative Attractant. Environ. Entomol. 2013, 42, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Kwon, O.S.; Jung, S.H.; Yang, B.S. Topical Administration of Manuka Oil Prevents UV-B Irradiation-Induced Cutaneous Photoaging in Mice. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 2013, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Park, M.-I.; Lee, B.-J.; Lee, S.W.; Tag, H.; Soonkyu, J. Vitamin C Derivative and Manuka Oil Surface Treated Composite Powder for Skin-Whitening and Wrinkle-Care. Patent KR101639615B1, 15 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
  67. Looker, K.J.; Garnett, G.P. A systematic review of the epidemiology and interaction of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2005, 81, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Astani, A.; Reichling, J.; Schnitzler, P. Screening for Antiviral Activities of Isolated Compounds from Essential Oils. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2011, 2011, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Schnitzler, P.; Wiesenhofer, K.; Reichling, J. Comparative study on the cytotoxicity of different Myrtaceae essential oils on cultured vero and RC-37 cells. Die Pharm. 2008, 63, 830–835. [Google Scholar]
  70. Schnitzler, P. Essential Oils for the Treatment of Herpes Simplex Virus Infections. Chemotherapy 2019, 64, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Lis-Balchin, M.; Hart, S.L. An Investigation of the Actions of the Essential oils of Manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) and Kanuka (Kunzea ericoides), Myrtaceae on Guinea-pig Smooth Muscle. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1998, 50, 809–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lis-Balchin, M. Essential oils and ’aromatherapy’: Their modern role in healing. J. R. Soc. Health 1997, 117, 324–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Campo Research PTE Ltd. Manuka Oil Extract Leptospermum Scoparium; Campo Research PTE Ltd.: Singapore, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  74. Yoo, J.-G.; Han, M.; Hong, N. External Preparation for Antibacterial, Anti-Inflammatory and Skin Protection Containing Manuka Oil as a Main Ingredient. Patent KR19990016741A, 12 May 2003. [Google Scholar]
  75. Searching the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG). Available online: https://www.tga.gov.au/searching-australian-register-therapeutic-goods-artg (accessed on 1 July 2020).
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition of Mānuka oil and known properties of each component.
Table 1. Chemical composition of Mānuka oil and known properties of each component.
ComponentPercentage in Commercial CompositionsIUPAC NameKnown PropertiesRef.
α-pineneUp to 21.5% Pharmaceuticals 13 00343 i001Reported to have antibiotic resistance modulation, anticoagulant, antitumor, antimicrobial, antimalarial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-Leishmania, and analgesic effects in association with other essential oils.[16,17]
Leptospermone 0.8–19.4%6-isovaleryl-2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-1,3,5-cyclohexanetrione
Pharmaceuticals 13 00343 i002		Herbicidal; antibacterial: treatment with 5–20 mg/disc of concentrate was effective against foodborne bacteria: Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus intermedius and three Gram-negative bacteria: Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella flexneri and Shigella sonnei [18,19,20]
Calamenene2.5–18.5%1,6-Dimethyl-4-isopropyltetralin
Pharmaceuticals 13 00343 i003		Major constituent of mānuka oil; contributes to insecticidal, antiseptic, bactericidal, analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties.
Antibacterial effect against S. aureus and MRSA was shown.		[12,21]
δ-cadinene0.9–6.9% Pharmaceuticals 13 00343 i004Pesticidal effects against mosquito have been shown for constituents isolated from Kadsura heteroclita leaf oil.[22]
Cadina-1,4-diene 0.1–5.9% Pharmaceuticals 13 00343 i005Not reported
Cadina-3,5-diene3.0–10.0% Pharmaceuticals 13 00343 i006Not reported
Flavesone 0.7–5.8%2,2,4,4-Tetramethyl-6-(3-methylbutanoyl)cyclohexane-1,3,5-trione
Pharmaceuticals 13 00343 i007		Antiviral properties.[23]
α-copaene4.3–6.5%(1R,2S,6S,7S,8S)-8-isopropyl-1,3-dimethyltricyclo[4.4.0.02,7]dec-3-ene
Pharmaceuticals 13 00343 i008
C15H24		Enhances mating in male Mediterranean fruit flies; Lures for trapping Redbay ambrosia beetle (Xyleborus glabratus).[24,25]
α-selinene1.3–5.0%7-Epi-alpha-Selinene
Pharmaceuticals 13 00343 i009
α-selinene
C15H24		Insecticidal: retarding the growth of mosquito larvae. [21]
α-terpineol 1–2%2-(4-methylcyclohex-3-en-1-yl)propan-2-ol
Pharmaceuticals 13 00343 i010
C10H18O		Antifungal effects; preservative for the postharvest storage of grapes and other fruits; has been shown to suppress the production of inflammatory mediators when sourced from Tea tree oil.[26,27]
terpinene-4-ol0.8–1.4%4-methyl-1-propan-2-ylcyclohex-3-en-1-ol
Pharmaceuticals 13 00343 i011
C10H18O		Spasmolytic activity; anti-inflammatory properties have been characterized in constituent isolated from Melaleuca alternifolia. [28]
* IUPAC names were obtained from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/; Chemical structures were obtained from https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.
Table
Table 2. Antibacterial activity of Mānuka oil.
Table 2. Antibacterial activity of Mānuka oil.
OrganismMethod of Analysis%(vol/vol) (µg/mL)RelevanceRef.
# MIC* MBC
Gram positive bacteria
Atopobium vaginaeBroth microdilution0.0010.001Vaginal infections, pre-term birth and neonatal infections[53]
Bacillus subtilisBroth microdilution0.030.50Intestinal bacteria[35]
Bacteroides vulgatusBroth microdilution0.0010.001Vaginal infections, pre-term birth and neonatal infections[53]
Lactobacillus plantarumBroth microdilution12.5Not reportedOral probiotic[52]
H2O2-producing lactobacilli and non H2O2-producing lactobacilliBroth microdilution0.0750.075Vaginal bacteria[53]
Listeria monocytogenesTwo-fold serial dilution 0.414Not reportedFoodborne pathogen[49]
Gardnerella vaginalisBroth microdilution0.0010.001Vaginal infections, pre-term birth and neonatal infections[53]
Propionibacterium acnes ATCC 11827Broth microdilution0.055Not reportedAcne[41]
Propionibacterium acnesBroth microdilution0.2110.25Acne[43]
Staphylococcus aureusTwo‘-fold serial dilution 0.535Not reportedFoodborne pathogen[49]
S. aureus strainsTwo-fold serial dilution0.513Not reportedMultiple clinical manifestations in humans[36]
Methicillin-resistant S. aureusBroth microdilution0.031.0Skin infections, pneumonia, sepsis, surgical site infections[35]
Streptococcus agalactiaeBroth microdilution0.0010.001Meningitis; sepsis[53]
Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 2223Broth microdilution1.40Not reportedAcne[41]
S. intermediusBroth microdilution0.0581Not reportedFoodborne pathogen[49]
S. sorbinusBroth microdilution0.048Not reportedOral pathogen[36]
S. sorbinus 671596-well liquid culture microdilution0.130.25Oral pathogen[38]
S. sorbinus B1396-well liquid culture microdilution0.250.25Oral pathogen
S. mutans JC296-well liquid culture microdilution0.250.25Oral pathogen
S. mutans ATCC 25175Two-fold microdilution6.2Not reportedOral pathogen; dental caries[52]
Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VRE)Broth microdilution0.0064Not reportedSepsis; infection of open wounds[45]
Gram negative bacteria
Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (now known as Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans) strains Y4, ATCC 29523, 29524, 3338496-well liquid culture microdilution0.030.13Oral pathogen[38]
Escherichia coliBroth microdilution>4>4Intestinal bacteria; opportunistic pathogen[35]
E. coli antibiotic and multidrug resistant strainsTwo-fold microdilution1–42–4Hospital-based infections[50]
Fusobacterium nucleatum ATCC 25586 strainsBroth microdilution0.030.03Periodontal disease; dental caries[50]
H. pyloriBroth microdilutionNot reported0.4Gastritis, gastric ulcers and gastric cancer[46]
Klebsiella pneumoniae spp. antibiotics and multidrug resistant isolatesMicrodilution2–42–8Hospital-based infections; opportunistic pathogen[50]
Porphyromonas gingivalis ATCC 33277, W50 and Su6396-well liquid culture microdilution0.030.06Oral pathogen[38]
P. gingivalis ATCC 5397796-well liquid culture microdilution0.030.03Oral pathogen[38]
Pseudomonas aeruginosa antibiotic and multidrug resistant isolatesTwo-fold microdilution≥8≥8Burn wound infections, sepsis[50]
Proteus mirabilisTwo-fold microdilution1–42–8Hospital based infections
Salmonella typhimuriumTwo-fold serial dilution0.00236Not reported Foodborne bacteria[49]
S. flexneriTwo-fold serial dilution0.00653Foodborne bacteria[49]
S. sonneiTwo-fold serial dilution0.00697Foodborne bacteria[49]
Serratia marcescensBroth microdilution≥4≥4Opportunistic pathogen[35]
* MIC: Minimum inhibitory concentration: minimum dose required to inhibit growth of bacteria; # MBC: Minimum bactericidal concentration: minimum dose required to kill bacteria.
Table
Table 3. Antifungal activity of Mānuka oil.
Table 3. Antifungal activity of Mānuka oil.
Organism* MIC (% v/v)# MFC (% v/v)RelevanceRef.
Malassezia furfur1.56Not reportedPityriasis versicolor and Pityrosporum folliculitis[37]
Trichosporon mucoides1.56Not reportedOpportunistic pathogen
Candida albicans3.13Not reportedOpportunistic pathogen
Candida tropicalis3.13Not reportedOpportunistic pathogen
Candida albicans0.015 0.015Candida vulvovaginitis infections[53]
Candida glabrata0.0100.010Vaginal candidiasis
* MIC: Minimum inhibitory concentration; # MFC: Minimum Fungicidal concentration. Both values were determined using microdilution assays.
Table
Table 4. Antiparasitic or insecticidal effect of Mānuka oil.
Table 4. Antiparasitic or insecticidal effect of Mānuka oil.
OrganismMethodLethal EffectClinical SignificanceRef.
Acaricidal activity
Dermanyssus gallinaeContact assayLC50: 0.02 to 0.03, LC90:0.05 to 0.07
LD99: 0.10 mg/cm2		Poultry red mite[58,59]
D. farinaeFabricated disc methodLD50: 0.54 μg/cm2House dust mite[20]
D. pteronyssinusLD50: 0.67 μg/cm2House dust mite
Tyrophagus putrescentiaeLD50: 1.21 μg/cm2Stored product mite
Sarcoptes scabeiContact assayLT50: 60 min for 5% solution
LT50: 30 min for 10% solution		Human scabies mites[14]
Drosophila suzukiiContact assay0.60 μg/mL for males and 1.10 for femalesFruit fly pest[60]
Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) larvaeLarvicidal bioassayLC90: 66.62Malaria[21,61]
Repellent effects
Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer)Fumigant assay80–84%Poultry red mite[62]
Dermanyssus gallinaeFumigant assay80%Poultry red mite[8,59]
Sarcoptes scabeiFumigant assay80%Human scabies mites[14]
Table
Table 5. Cytotoxicity of Mānuka oil in vitro.
Table 5. Cytotoxicity of Mānuka oil in vitro.
Cell LineAssayTest* TC50ControlRef.
RC-37 cells (African green monkey kidney cells)Neutral red assay after treatment for 72 hβ-pinene0.006%1% ethanol[68]
RC-37 cells (African green monkey kidney cells)Neutral red assay after treatment for 96 hMānuka oil
Leptospermone		0.0042%
0.04%		2.6% ethanol[68]
THP-1 (monocyte/macrophage cell line)XTT cell viability assay after 48 h of treatment0.1–10% dissolved in DMSONo toxicityDMSO[37]
Vero (African green monkey kidney cells)Neutral red assay 96 h after treatmentMānuka oil (0.001% to 1%)
Leptospermone		0.0042%
0.04%		1% ethanol[69]
HUVEC (Human umbilical vein endothelial cells)Cell Titre AssayMānuka oil~0.4%No treatment[38]
* TC50; the concentration of drug that reduces the number of viable cells by 50%.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mathew, C.; Tesfaye, W.; Rasmussen, P.; Peterson, G.M.; Bartholomaeus, A.; Sharma, M.; Thomas, J. Mānuka Oil—A Review of Antimicrobial and Other Medicinal Properties. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13110343

AMA Style

Mathew C, Tesfaye W, Rasmussen P, Peterson GM, Bartholomaeus A, Sharma M, Thomas J. Mānuka Oil—A Review of Antimicrobial and Other Medicinal Properties. Pharmaceuticals. 2020; 13(11):343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13110343

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mathew, Cynthia, Wubshet Tesfaye, Phil Rasmussen, Gregory M Peterson, Andrew Bartholomaeus, Manab Sharma, and Jackson Thomas. 2020. "Mānuka Oil—A Review of Antimicrobial and Other Medicinal Properties" Pharmaceuticals 13, no. 11: 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13110343

APA Style

Mathew, C., Tesfaye, W., Rasmussen, P., Peterson, G. M., Bartholomaeus, A., Sharma, M., & Thomas, J. (2020). Mānuka Oil—A Review of Antimicrobial and Other Medicinal Properties. Pharmaceuticals, 13(11), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13110343

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop