Next Article in Journal
An Overview on Wireless Sensor Networks Technology and Evolution
Next Article in Special Issue
Platform for a Hydrocarbon Exhaust Gas Sensor Utilizing a Pumping Cell and a Conductometric Sensor
Previous Article in Journal
Optical Sensors Based on Whispering Gallery Modes in Fluorescent Microbeads: Size Dependence and Influence of Substrate
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation, Characterization and Sensitive Gas Sensing of Conductive Core-sheath TiO2-PEDOT Nanocables
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sensors 2009, 9(9), 6853-6868;

The Effects of Two Thick Film Deposition Methods on Tin Dioxide Gas Sensor Performance

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rowan University / 201 Mullica Hill Road, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan / 2350 Hayward Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 June 2009 / Revised: 26 August 2009 / Accepted: 27 August 2009 / Published: 31 August 2009
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gas Sensors 2009)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1210 KB, uploaded 21 June 2014]


This work demonstrates the variability in performance between SnO2 thick film gas sensors prepared using two types of film deposition methods. SnO2 powders were deposited on sensor platforms with and without the use of binders. Three commonly utilized binder recipes were investigated, and a new binder-less deposition procedure was developed and characterized. The binder recipes yielded sensors with poor film uniformity and poor structural integrity, compared to the binder-less deposition method. Sensor performance at a fixed operating temperature of 330 ºC for the different film deposition methods was evaluated by exposure to 500 ppm of the target gas carbon monoxide. A consequence of the poor film structure, large variability and poor signal properties were observed with the sensors fabricated using binders. Specifically, the sensors created using the binder recipes yielded sensor responses that varied widely (e.g., S = 5 – 20), often with hysteresis in the sensor signal. Repeatable and high quality performance was observed for the sensors prepared using the binder-less dispersion-drop method with good sensor response upon exposure to 500 ppm CO (S = 4.0) at an operating temperature of 330 ºC, low standard deviation to the sensor response (±0.35) and no signal hysteresis. View Full-Text
Keywords: SnO2; gas sensor; fabrication; combustion; deposition; film; binder SnO2; gas sensor; fabrication; combustion; deposition; film; binder
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Bakrania, S.D.; Wooldridge, M.S. The Effects of Two Thick Film Deposition Methods on Tin Dioxide Gas Sensor Performance. Sensors 2009, 9, 6853-6868.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top