Next Article in Journal
Peak-Independent Cuffless Blood Pressure Monitoring Using a Smart Sock: The Role of Temporal Lag Modeling in Foot-Based PPG
Previous Article in Journal
Material Degradation Inverse Identification for Cantilever Beams Using Experimental Frequency Response Function
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Highly Sensitive CH4/C2H2 Dual-Component TDLAS Sensor Based on a Dual-Channel Hexagram Multi-Pass Cell

1
National Key Laboratory of Laser Spatial Information, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
2
Zhengzhou Research Institute, Harbin Institute of Technology, Zhengzhou 450008, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2026, 26(4), 1267; https://doi.org/10.3390/s26041267
Submission received: 22 January 2026 / Revised: 6 February 2026 / Accepted: 14 February 2026 / Published: 15 February 2026

Abstract

A tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) sensor with a highly sensitive dual-component for methane (CH4) and acetylene (C2H2) detection is reported in this paper for the first time. A multi-pass cell (MPC) design model was established employing a vector-based ray-tracing method. A dual-channel MPC with an interlaced dual hexagonal star pattern was designed to improve gas absorption and realize real-time synchronous detection of CH4 and C2H2. During the simultaneous continuous monitoring of CH4 and C2H2, the sensor exhibited an excellent linear response to concentration variations. The minimum detection limit (MDL) for CH4 reached 132.08 ppb, improving to 77.32 ppb when the average time was increased to 300 s. In the case of C2H2, the MDL was measured at 20.19 ppb and further reduced to 3.50 ppb under the same extended average time.

1. Introduction

Trace gas detection serves as a critical technology in a wide range of applications, spanning environmental monitoring, industrial processes, and healthcare systems [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Methane (CH4), which accounts for more than 85% of natural gas composition, is a primary contributor to mining explosions and acts as a potent greenhouse gas. Its global warming potential over a 20-year horizon is approximately 84 times greater than that of carbon dioxide [10,11,12]. In recent years, accelerated global industrialization has driven a consistent rise in atmospheric CH4 levels, increasing at an average annual rate of 15–17 ppb and posing substantial risks to global climatic stability [13,14,15]. Concurrently, acetylene (C2H2) represents a key feedstock in chemical synthesis for numerous organic compounds and is extensively used in metalworking applications such as cutting and welding. Nevertheless, it exhibits high flammability and explosivity, with an explosive range in air of 2.5% to 81%, where even minimal ignition sources may induce severe detonation [16,17]. Given the considerable implications of both gases for industrial safety and environmental oversight, there is a pressing need for sensor systems that enable simultaneous, high-sensitivity detection of CH4 and C2H2.
Among existing techniques for trace gas analysis, laser absorption spectroscopy (LAS) is distinguished by its high selectivity, sensitivity, and rapid response [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Commonly employed LAS methods include photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS), quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy (QEPAS), tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS), and light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy (LITES) [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. PAS configurations typically require relatively large photoacoustic cells, which complicate miniaturization and system integration. Both QEPAS and LITES rely on quartz tuning forks as detectors, which are limited by narrow bandwidths and present optical alignment difficulties. In contrast, TDLAS is based on direct absorption and does not depend on photoacoustic resonance or quartz transducers, thereby avoiding modulation frequency constraints. Its optical layout allows straightforward alignment, and the interface between photodetectors and supporting electronics is comparatively simple to implement.
Since TDLAS quantifies gas concentration by measuring laser intensity attenuation due to absorption, the technique currently confronts two main challenges [46]. The first pertains to achieving high detection sensitivity within a compact footprint. According to the Lambert–Beer’s law, the strength of the absorption signal is proportional to the optical path length (OPL). Extending OPL traditionally increases system volume (V), which conflicts with the pursuit of miniaturized sensor designs. Thus, realizing a long OPL in a small form factor remains a significant hurdle in TDLAS development. Multi-pass cells (MPCs) are frequently utilized in TDLAS systems to enhance effective OPL and improve detection sensitivity. A commonly adopted metric for evaluating MPC performance is the optical path length-to-volume ratio (OPL/V). Compared with conventional MPC designs such as White and Herriott cells, MPCs with dense spot patterns offer superior OPL/V and have recently gained considerable research interest. The second challenge in TDLAS involves simultaneous multi-gas detection. Many reported studies employ diode lasers to scan adjacent absorption lines of different gases sequentially. However, this strategy is only viable for specific gas combinations and lacks broad applicability.
In this work, we proposed a high-sensitivity dual-component TDLAS sensor based on a novel MPC with an interlaced dual hexagonal star pattern for the first time. An MPC design model was established employing a vector-based ray-tracing method. Two independent optical paths were configured to form a dual hexagonal star spot pattern. Through spatial division multiplexing within the MPC, a dual-component sensor capable of simultaneously monitoring CH4 and C2H2 concentrations was successfully implemented.

2. The Design of Dual Path MPC with Interlaced Dual Hexagonal Star Pattern

The Herriott cell is commonly employed owing to its straightforward construction and convenient optical alignment. Nevertheless, its typical circular or elliptical spot distributions yield a comparatively limited OPL/V [47,48,49]. To enhance the OPL/V, the laser incident angle can be increased, and spherical aberration induced by reflections from the concave spherical mirrors can be harnessed to generate a dense spot pattern using a dual-mirror configuration. Given that the laser enters the system at a non-paraxial angle, a vector-based ray-tracing methodology is appropriate for analyzing this MPC design. As illustrated in Figure 1, the self-designed MPC comprises two concave spherical mirrors, each with a radius of curvature of 100 mm and a diameter of 50.8 mm. Additionally, the surface quality of the mirrors is characterized by a peak-to-valley (PV) value of 3λ and an irregularity (IRR) of 0.5λ.
The two mirrors are placed coaxially, with the optical axis defined as the Z axis. The distance between the two mirrors is denoted as d. Laser 1 and Laser 2 are simultaneously incident through different entrance holes h (h1 and h2) on Mirror 1 (M1). After hundreds of reflections, they exit the MPC through the exit hole h1′ on Mirror 2 (M2) and the entrance hole h2, respectively. The incident angles of Laser 1 and Laser 2 are defined by (θ1, φ1) and (θ2, φ2), respectively, where θ is the angle between the incident laser and the Z axis and φ is the angle between the projection of the incident ray on the XY plane and the X axis. In the vector-based ray-tracing method, the equations can be expressed as
P i + 1 = P i + ρ i P i
ρ i = ( P i ( P i r i ) ) 2 | P i r i | 2 + R 2 P i ( P i r i )
P ( i + 1 ) = P i 2   ( P i n i ) n i
where P i denotes the coordinate of the i -th spot, P i represents the unit direction vector of the incident beam, and n i is the unit normal vector to the mirror surface at the i -th reflection. The ρ i corresponds to the geometrical path length of the i -th ray segment and the center of curvature for the mirror, denoted as r i , which directs the i -th reflection. Using Equations (1)–(3) provided above, the coordinates of successive spots on the mirror can be computed iteratively. Figure 2a–c show the simulated spot patterns for the two individual optical paths and their combined dual-path configuration, respectively. Under a mirror separation of 104.94 mm, Laser 1 was directed into the cell at entrance hole h1 (3.13, 16.84) with incident angles θ1 at −9.25° and φ1 at −3.2°, generating the hexagonal star spot pattern shown in Figure 2a. The beam completed 167 reflections before emerging from exit hole h1′ (13.47, −12.14), producing an optical path length of 17.52 m. Given the MPC volume of 206 mL, the resulting OPL/V ratio reached 8.50 cm−2. Owing to the coaxial two-mirror configuration, rotating the spot pattern without altering its shape was achieved simply by adjusting the incident angles and entry location while retaining the original MPC geometry. As presented in Figure 2b, when the beam entered at entrance hole h2 (0, 19.12), it underwent 168 reflections before exiting through the same hole. This optical path was measured as 17.63 m in length and delivered an OPL/V ratio of 8.56 cm−2, with corresponding incident angles θ2 of −7.55° and φ2 of −7.45°. When both laser beams were simultaneously coupled into the MPC, an intricate interlaced dual-hexagonal-star spot pattern was obtained within the same compact volume of 206 mL, as shown in Figure 2c. Figure 3a–c present the corresponding experimentally recorded spot images, which are in good agreement with the simulation results. Both hexagonal-star spot patterns were formed by the aggregation of over 160 small reflection spots, which effectively prevents overlap interference and maximizes mirror utilization, thereby increasing the combined OPL/V of the dual optical paths to 17.06 cm−2.
In order to validate the discrepancy between the experimentally achieved OPL of the MPC and its theoretical design, as well as to examine potential optical crosstalk between the two independent beam paths, direct absorption experiments targeting CH4 and C2H2 were performed using the fabricated MPC. The measured spot distribution of the MPC on the incident mirror, obtained using fiber-coupled probe lasers, is illustrated in Figure 3. The detailed parameters of the MPC are listed in Table 1. The hole diameters on the mirrors were all set to 2 mm. The thickness of each mirror was 4 mm. The mirrors used were silver-coated, offering not only a reflectivity of 98% but also low cost and a broad operational wavelength range.
Compared to the MPCs reported in the existing literature, the present MPC achieves improvements in two critical parameters: OPL and OPL/V, demonstrating its superior performance. Table 2 provides a comprehensive comparison of MPCs from multiple current studies.

3. Experimental Setup

The experimental configuration is depicted in Figure 4, with insets displaying the actual spot patterns captured via red and green alignment lasers. After initial alignment, the fiber-coupled alignment lasers were substituted with fiber-coupled probe lasers without altering the position or orientation of the collimating lens (C-lens), thereby ensuring precise overlap between the probe beams and the intended optical paths. Two distributed feedback (DFB) diode lasers served as the optical sources for CH4 and C2H2 detection, respectively. The maximum output power of both lasers was approximately 15 mW. To suppress background noise, wavelength modulation spectroscopy (WMS) was implemented in this dual-gas sensor system. That is, the laser was modulated by superimposing a low-frequency sawtooth wave on a high-frequency sine wave. The modulated laser then sequentially passed through a collimating lens and pinhole apertures before entering the MPC. Following hundreds of reflections, an intricate interlaced hexagonal-star spot pattern emerged on the mirror surfaces. The two beams subsequently exited through separate output apertures and were converged onto the active areas of their corresponding photodetectors via focusing lenses (F-lenses) of 75 mm focal length. A 50 s ramp waveform was used to sweep the laser wavelength gradually across the target absorption line, while a 1 kHz sinusoidal modulation from a lock-in amplifier was simultaneously applied to each laser source. The detected signals were processed by the lock-in amplifier using second-harmonic (2f) demodulation with an integration time of 200 ms. Concentrations of CH4 and C2H2 inside the MPC were precisely regulated by adjusting the individual gas flow rates, while the total flow was held constant at 300 sccm.
Two absorption features were employed in this sensing system: one centered at 1653.72 nm (6046.97 cm−1) of CH4 and the other at 1530.37 nm (6534.37 cm−1) of C2H2. Measurements were carried out under near-standard atmospheric pressure and room temperature conditions. Within the MPC, the concentrations of CH4 and C2H2 were maintained at 400 ppm and 100 ppm. The corresponding results are presented in Figure 5. Scanning the injection current of Laser 1 across the CH4 absorption line yielded a detectable electrical signal exclusively on Photodetector 1 (PD1). Conversely, when the scan was applied to Laser 2, a pronounced signal appeared only on Photodetector 2 (PD2). A polynomial fit to the signal regions outside the absorption peaks provided the baseline reference. From the recorded absorption profiles and fitting baselines, absorbance values of 0.285 for CH4 and 0.201 for C2H2 were derived, with no appreciable crosstalk evident between the two channels. As illustrated in Figure 6, the measured OPLs for optical path 1 and optical path 2, calculated from the absorption data, were 18.91 m and 17.42 m, respectively. Observed deviations primarily stemmed from laser intensity drift and uncertainties in baseline fitting during signal processing.

4. Results and Discussion

In this dual-gas sensor system, the concentrations of CH4 and C2H2 standard gases were set to 400 ppm and 100 ppm, respectively. The modulation depths for CH4/C2H2 dual-gas sensing were optimized, as shown in Figure 7. Optimal 2f signals for CH4 and C2H2 dual-gas sensing were obtained at modulation depths of 1.83 mA and 8.93 mA, respectively.
The relationship between the 2f signal values and the concentrations of CH4 and C2H2 was investigated, with the results presented in Figure 8. Two mass flow controllers (MFCs) were used to adjust the flow rates of the CH4 and C2H2 standard gases, thereby regulating the concentrations of the dual-component gases in the MPC. The experimental results demonstrate that the 2f signals of CH4 and C2H2 TDLAS sensing were proportional to their respective concentrations, with no interference observed between the two gases. The 2f signal waveforms at different concentrations are displayed in Figure 9. The linear fitting of the concentration responses for CH4 and C2H2 was performed, as shown in Figure 10. After linear fitting, the R-squared values for both gas sensors were 0.99, indicating excellent linear responses of the sensor to concentration.
To determine the minimum detection limit (MDL), the background noise was measured by flushing the MPC with pure nitrogen (N2). As shown in Figure 11, the corresponding noise values for the two paths were 11.0 μV and 2.90 μV, respectively. Based on calculations, the MDLs for CH4 and C2H2 were determined to be 132.08 ppb and 20.19 ppb, respectively. The selected absorption line intensity of C2H2 is stronger than that of CH4, which enables significantly better detection performance for C2H2 compared to CH4 in the dual-gas TDLAS sensor.
The long-term stability of the sensor system was evaluated using Allan deviation analysis. Pure N2 was flushed into the MPC. As shown in Figure 12, when the average time was extended to 300 s, the MDLs for CH4 and C2H2 were improved to 77.32 ppb and 3.50 ppb, respectively. Table 3 provides a comprehensive comparison of current spectroscopic techniques for detecting multiple gases. Clearly, the TDLAS system proposed in this work, utilizing an MPC with a dense interlaced dual hexagonal star pattern, offers the advantage of high-sensitivity simultaneous detection of CH4 and C2H2.

5. Conclusions

This paper presents a highly sensitive dual-gas TDLAS sensor for the simultaneous detection of CH4 and C2H2 based on a novel MPC with an interlaced dual hexagonal star pattern. A theoretical model for MPC design based on a pair of concave spherical mirrors has been developed. Within a compact volume of 206 mL, the MPC provides an OPL exceeding ten meters per channel, achieving an overall OPL/V of 17.06 cm−2 through its dense spot distribution. To further improve the sensor’s detection performance, WMS was implemented. The system exhibited excellent linear response for continuous, simultaneous monitoring of both target gases. The measured MDLs for CH4 and C2H2 were 132.08 ppb and 20.19 ppb, respectively. By extending the average time to 300 s, the MDLs could be further improved to 77.32 ppb for CH4 and 3.50 ppb for C2H2. Compared with conventional detection techniques, the proposed dual-component gas sensor offers notable advantages in sensitivity, compactness, and simultaneous multi-gas measurement capability, positioning it as a promising tool for applications in industrial safety and environmental monitoring.

Author Contributions

Investigation, methodology, and writing—original draft preparation, X.L.; validation, X.S., H.S., R.W., S.Q. and Y.H.; validation, supervision, writing—review and editing, Y.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We are grateful for financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62335006, 62275065, 625B2063, 62405078, and 62505066), Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (Grant Nos. BS2025F002 and LH2024F031), Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Fund (Grant Nos. LBH-Z23144 and LBH-Z24155), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2024M764172), Open Subject of Hebei Key Laboratory of Advanced Laser Technology and Equipment (HBKL-ALTE2025001), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (HIT.DZJJ.2025015 and HIT.NSFJG202463).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Y.; He, Y.; Qiao, S.; Liu, X.; Zhang, C.; Duan, X.; Ma, Y. Fast step heterodyne light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy gas sensing based on a quartz tuning fork with high-frequency of 100 kHz. Opto-Electron. Adv. 2026, 9, 250150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, K.; Wang, L.; Tan, T.; Wang, G.; Zhang, W.; Chen, W.; Gao, X. Highly sensitive detection of methane by near-infrared laser absorption spectroscopy using a compact dense-pattern multipass cell. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 220, 1000–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, T.; Zhao, P.; Wang, P.; Krishnaiah, K.; Jin, W.; Zhang, A. Miniature optical fiber photoacoustic spectroscopy gas sensor based on a 3D micro-printed planar-spiral spring optomechanical resonator. Photoacoustics 2024, 40, 100657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sun, N.; Gan, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wang, X.; Shen, S.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, J. Single-beam optical trap-based surface-enhanced raman scattering optofluidic molecular fingerprint spectroscopy detection system. Opto-Electron. Adv. 2025, 8, 240182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ma, H.; Qiao, S.; He, Y.; Zhang, C.; Ma, Y. Overtone acoustic feedback enhanced light induced thermoelastic spectroscopy sensing. Photonics Res. 2026, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zifarelli, A.; Negro, G.; Mongelli, L.A.; Sampaolo, A.; Ranieri, E.; Dong, L.; Wu, H.; Patimisco, P.; Gonnella, G.; Spagnolo, V. Effect of gas turbulence in quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy: A comprehensive flow field analysis. Photoacoustics 2024, 38, 100625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yang, H.; Mo, H.; Zhang, J.; Hong, L.; Li, Z. Observation of single-molecule Raman spectroscopy enabled by synergic electromagnetic and chemical enhancement. PhotoniX 2024, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qiao, S.; Liu, X.; Lang, Z.; He, Y.; Chen, W.; Ma, Y. Quartz-enhanced laser spectroscopy sensing. Light Sci. Appl. 2026, 15, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, J.; Wu, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, G.; Wang, Y.; Feng, C.; Cui, R.; Gong, Z.; Dong, L. Cantilever-enhanced dual-comb photoacoustic spectroscopy. Photoacoustics 2024, 38, 100605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wu, H.; Dong, L.; Yin, X.; Sampaolo, A.; Patimisco, P.; Ma, W.; Zhang, L.; Yin, W.; Xiao, L.; Spagnolo, V.; et al. Atmospheric CH4 measurement near a landfill using an ICL-based QEPAS sensor with V-T relaxation self-calibration. Sensor. Actuat. B Chem. 2019, 297, 126753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, B.; Wei, T.; Zhang, M.; Qiao, L.; Ma, Z.; Sampaolo, A.; Patimisco, P.; Spagnolo, V.; Wu, H.; Dong, L. Optical synchronous signal demodulation-based quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy for remote, multi-point methane detection in complex environments. Photoacoustics 2025, 43, 100708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, Q.; Gong, W.; Chang, J.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, T.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Liu, T. Long-distance free space gas detection system based on QEPTS technique for CH4 leakage monitoring. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2022, 122, 104091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zou, M.; Sun, L.; Wang, X. CH4/C2H6 dual-gas sensing system based on wavelength modulation spectroscopy using a single near infrared laser. Spectrochim. Acta A 2022, 272, 120970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Panda, B.; Pal, A.; Chakraborty, S.; Pradhan, M. An EC-QCL based dual-species (CH4/N2O) detection method at 7.8 µm in mid-IR region for simultaneous applications of atmospheric monitoring and breath diagnostics. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2022, 125, 104261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, L.; Pang, T.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, P.; Xia, H.; Wu, B.; Guo, Q.; Werner Sigrist, M.; Shu, C. A novel compact intrinsic safety full range Methane microprobe sensor using “trans-world” processing method based on near-infrared spectroscopy. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 334, 129680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; Qin, L.; Bi, S.; Wang, Z. Detection of CH4 and C2H2 utilizing frequency division multiplexing based on two-on-beam quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy technology. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2026, 152, 106260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Niu, C.; Yang, X.; Li, C.; Liu, B.; Zhang, C.; Sun, H.; Qiao, S.; He, Y.; Geng, T.; Ma, Y. All-fiber offset-core sandwich-structured gas sensor based on photothermal spectroscopy detection. Opt. Express 2026, 34, 6476–6485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pei, Z.; Ji, C.; Shao, M.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Man, B.; Li, Z.; Yu, J.; Zhang, C. Enrichment strategies in surface-enhanced Raman scattering: Theoretical insights and optical design for enhanced light-matter interaction. Opto-Electron. Sci. 2025, 4, 250015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, L.; Lv, H.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, C.; Luo, H.; Lin, H.; Xie, J.; Zhu, W.; Zhong, Y.; Liu, B.; et al. Sub-ppb level HCN photoacoustic sensor employing dual-tube resonator enhanced clamp-type tuning fork and U-net neural network noise filter. Photoacoustics 2024, 38, 100629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nie, Q.; Peng, Y.; Chen, Q.; Liu, N.; Wang, Z.; Wang, C.; Ren, W. Agile cavity ringdown spectroscopy enabled by moderate optical feedback to a quantum cascade laser. Opto-Electron. Adv. 2024, 7, 240077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mu, J.; Han, G.; Wang, R.; Qiao, S.; He, Y.; Ma, Y. Photoacoustic spectroscopy and light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy based on inverted triangular lithium niobate tuning fork. Opto-Electron. Sci. 2025, 4, 250035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ma, H.; Li, C.; He, Y.; Qiao, S.; Zhang, C.; Ma, Y. Dual-mode quartz-enhanced spectroscopy enabled by mixed heterodyne demodulation for frequency-mismatch-free gas sensing. Laser Photonics Rev. 2025, e02059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. He, Y.; Tao, H.; Wang, Y.; Qiao, S.; Zhang, C.; Qi, H.; Hu, S.; Huang, W.; Yu, D.; Ma, Y. Standoff LITES sensor based on a frequency-stabilized encased quartz tuning fork. Laser Photonics Rev. 2026, e02918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Qiao, S.; Lang, Z.; He, Y.; Zhi, X.; Ma, Y. Calibration-free measurement of absolute gas concentration and temperature via light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy. Adv. Photonics 2025, 7, 066007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ran, S.; Ni, W.; Yang, C.; Zhao, Z.; Lin, Q.; He, B.; Wu, R.; Shum, P. Fiber-tip photothermal transducer with gold-coated multi-beam interferometric cavity for high sensitivity gas detection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2025, 126, 062201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, X.; Li, J.; Ni, X.; Liu, H.; Zhuge, Q.; Chen, H.; Shieh, W.; Su, Y. Direct detection with an optimal transfer function: Toward the electrical spectral efficiency of coherent homodyne detection. Opto-Electron. Sci. 2025, 4, 240020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lou, C.; Li, X.; Chen, H.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, J.Q.; Liu, X. Polymer-coated quartz tuning fork for enhancing sensitivity of laser-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 12195–12205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, C.; He, Y.; Qiao, S.; Ma, Y. Indirect detection of hydrogen based on light induced thermoelastic spectroscopy. Opt. Express 2026, 34, 1905–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, G.; Yu, H. Research highlight: Breaking the shot noise limit of mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy using intensity-difference squeezing. eLight 2025, 5, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Minamikawa, T.; Sakaguchi, R.; Harada, Y.; Tanioka, H.; Inoue, S.; Hase, H.; Mori, Y.; Takamatsu, T.; Yamasaki, Y.; Morimoto, Y.; et al. Long-range enhancement for fluorescence and Raman spectroscopy using Ag nanoislands protected with column-structured silica overlayer. Light Sci. Appl. 2024, 13, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hong, L.; Yang, H.; Zhang, J.; Gao, Z.; Li, Z. Coulomb attraction driven spontaneous molecule-hotspot paring enables universal, fast, and large-scale uniform single-molecule Raman spectroscopy. Opto-Electron. Adv. 2025, 8, 240309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, R.; Han, G.; He, Y.; Qiao, S.; Ma, Y. Lithium niobate tuning fork-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy and light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2025, 12, 041404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Han, X.; Li, C.; Qi, H.; Peng, W.; Chen, K. Carbon black absorption enhanced fiber-optic photoacoustic gas sensing system with ultrahigh sensitivity. Anal. Chem. 2025, 97, 2518–2524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sun, H.; Qiao, S.; He, Y.; Sun, X.; Ma, Y. Parts-per-quadrillion level gas molecule detection: CO-LITES sensing. Light Sci. Appl. 2025, 14, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mei, H.; Wang, G.; Xu, Y.; He, H.; Yao, J.; He, S. Simultaneous measurement of methane, propane and isobutane using a compact mid-infrared photoacoustic spectrophone. Photoacoustics 2024, 39, 100635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, D.; Zhang, H.; Fan, H.; Hu, M.; Wang, H.; Zhou, J.; Lv, J.; Liang, J.; Wang, Q. Cavity-enhanced light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy for trace-gas sensing. Opt. Express 2024, 32, 33618–33627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, Z.; Nie, Q.; Sun, H.; Wang, Q.; Borri, S.; Natale, P.; Ren, W. Cavity-enhanced photoacoustic dual-comb spectroscopy. Light Sci. Appl. 2024, 13, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, R.; Qiao, S.; He, Y.; Ma, Y. Highly sensitive laser spectroscopy sensing based on a novel four-prong quartz tuning fork. Opto-Electron. Adv. 2025, 8, 240275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ma, Y.; Sun, X.; Sun, H.; He, Y.; Qiao, S. An ultra-highly sensitive LITES sensor based on multi-pass cell with ultra-dense spot pattern designed by multi-objective algorithm. PhotoniX 2025, 6, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, R.; Guan, X.; Qiao, S.; Jia, Q.; He, Y.; Wang, S.; Ma, Y. Ultrahigh sensitive LITES sensor based on a trilayer ultrathin perfect absorber coated T-head quartz tuning fork. Laser Photonics Rev. 2025, 19, 2402107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, J.; Wu, H.; Sampaolo, A.; Patimisco, P.; Spagnolo, V.; Jia, S.; Dong, L. Quartz-enhanced multiheterodyne resonant photoacoustic spectroscopy. Light Sci. Appl. 2024, 13, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nguyen, D.; Kim, D.; Lee, G.; Kim, S.; Shin, D.; Park, J.; Choi, H.; Kim, S.; Kim, S.; Kim, Y. Real-time monitoring of fast gas dynamics with a single-molecule resolution by frequency-comb-referenced plasmonic phase spectroscopy. PhotoniX 2024, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Feng, C.; Shen, X.; Li, B.; Liu, X.; Jing, Y.; Huang, Q.; Patimisco, P.; Spagnolo, V.; Dong, L.; Wu, H. Carbon monoxide impurities in hydrogen detected with resonant photoacoustic cell using a mid-IR laser source. Photoacoustics 2024, 36, 100585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. He, Y.; Qiao, S.; Lang, T.; Zhang, C.; Qi, H.; Huang, W.; Ma, Y. Optical component-free dual-gas quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy sensor based on highly integrated interband cascade lasers. ACS Sensors 2025, 10, 5238–5244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhao, Z.; Kravtsov, V.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Dou, L.; Huang, D.; Wang, Z.; Cheng, X.; Raschke, M.; Jiang, T. Application of ultrafast nano-spectroscopy and nano-imaging with tip-based microscopy. eLight 2025, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fu, L.; Wang, F.; Zhang, J.; Han, Z.; Pang, S.; Wang, Q. Miniaturization study on helmholtz-based photoacoustic cell for PAS-based trace gas detection. Measurement 2024, 236, 115154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, J.; Grabe, T.; Götz, J.; Trapp, J.; Souza, A.; Biermann, T.; Wolf, A.; Ley, P.; Duan, K.; Lachmayer, R.; et al. Linear scalability of dense-pattern Herriott-type multipass cell design. Appl. Phys. B 2023, 129, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, J.; Chen, Y.; Xu, L.; Kong, R.; Liu, P.; Zhou, X. Generalized optical design and optimization of multipass cells with independent circle patterns based on the Monte Carlo and Nelder-Mead simplex algorithms. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 20250–20261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kong, R.; Liu, P.; Zhou, X. Decomposition-based multiobjective optimization for multipass cell design aided by particle swarm optimization and the K-means algorithm. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 10991–10998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Deng, X.; Zheng, X.; Wei, L.; Duo, Y.; Chen, S. Development of a Herriott multi-pass cell for gas phase terahertz spectroscopy. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2025, 151, 106113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fan, Y.; Shang, Z.; Chen, G.; Liu, C.; Xie, R.; Wang, X.; Gong, T.; Qiu, X.; Li, C. Compact light-induced thermoelastic sensor for ppb-level C2H2 detection exploiting a toroidal multi-pass cell. Opt. Laser Technol. 2025, 192, 114046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, G.; Cui, R.; Di, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Shang, Z.; Liu, X.; Tian, Q.; Wu, H.; Dong, L. Portable methane sensor system using miniature multi-pass cell for mobile monitoring of natural gas leaks. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2025, 431, 137457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, F.; Fu, L.; Zhang, J.; Sun, J.; Han, Z.; Pang, S.; Xue, Q.; Cao, D.; Li, Q.; Wang, Q. mL-level low gas consumption PAS sensor for dual gases CH4/C2H2 detection based on an optimized TT-type resonator. Measurement 2025, 242, 116288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ye, W.; Xia, Z.; Hu, L.; Luo, W.; Liu, W.; Xu, X.; Zheng, C. Infrared dual-gas CH4/C2H2 sensor system based on dual-channel off-beam quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy and time-division multiplexing technique. Spectrochim. Acta A 2023, 285, 121908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Structure diagram of the MPC. d: the distance between the mirrors; θ: the angle between the incident laser and the Z axis; φ: the angle between the projection of the incident ray in the XY plane and the X axis.
Figure 1. Structure diagram of the MPC. d: the distance between the mirrors; θ: the angle between the incident laser and the Z axis; φ: the angle between the projection of the incident ray in the XY plane and the X axis.
Sensors 26 01267 g001
Figure 2. Simulated spot distribution of the MPC on the incident mirror. (a) Spot pattern of path 1. (b) Spot pattern of path 2. (c) Spot pattern of the double paths.
Figure 2. Simulated spot distribution of the MPC on the incident mirror. (a) Spot pattern of path 1. (b) Spot pattern of path 2. (c) Spot pattern of the double paths.
Sensors 26 01267 g002
Figure 3. Measured spot distribution of the MPC on the incident mirror. (a) Spot pattern of path 1. (b) Spot pattern of path 2. (c) Spot pattern of the double paths.
Figure 3. Measured spot distribution of the MPC on the incident mirror. (a) Spot pattern of path 1. (b) Spot pattern of path 2. (c) Spot pattern of the double paths.
Sensors 26 01267 g003
Figure 4. Experimental setup of the dual-component TDLAS sensor based on MPC with an interlaced dual hexagonal star pattern.
Figure 4. Experimental setup of the dual-component TDLAS sensor based on MPC with an interlaced dual hexagonal star pattern.
Sensors 26 01267 g004
Figure 5. (a) Responses of PD1 to path 1 and path 2. (b) Responses of PD2 to path 1 and path 2.
Figure 5. (a) Responses of PD1 to path 1 and path 2. (b) Responses of PD2 to path 1 and path 2.
Sensors 26 01267 g005
Figure 6. (a) The absorbance of 400 ppm CH4 at 6046.97 cm−1. (b) The absorbance of 100 ppm C2H2 at 6534.37 cm−1.
Figure 6. (a) The absorbance of 400 ppm CH4 at 6046.97 cm−1. (b) The absorbance of 100 ppm C2H2 at 6534.37 cm−1.
Sensors 26 01267 g006
Figure 7. (a) Normalized 2f signal amplitude of 400 ppm of CH4 with different modulation depths. (b) Normalized 2f signal amplitude of 100 ppm of C2H2 with different modulation depths.
Figure 7. (a) Normalized 2f signal amplitude of 400 ppm of CH4 with different modulation depths. (b) Normalized 2f signal amplitude of 100 ppm of C2H2 with different modulation depths.
Sensors 26 01267 g007
Figure 8. Concentration responses of the dual-gas TDLAS sensor based on MPC.
Figure 8. Concentration responses of the dual-gas TDLAS sensor based on MPC.
Sensors 26 01267 g008
Figure 9. (a) 2f waveforms for CH4-TDLAS sensing. (b) 2f waveforms for C2H2-TDLAS sensing.
Figure 9. (a) 2f waveforms for CH4-TDLAS sensing. (b) 2f waveforms for C2H2-TDLAS sensing.
Sensors 26 01267 g009
Figure 10. (a) The linear relationship between the 2f signal amplitude and concentration of CH4. (b) The linear relationship between 2f signal amplitude and concentration of C2H2.
Figure 10. (a) The linear relationship between the 2f signal amplitude and concentration of CH4. (b) The linear relationship between 2f signal amplitude and concentration of C2H2.
Sensors 26 01267 g010
Figure 11. (a) Noise determination of CH4-TDLAS channel. (b) Noise determination of C2H2-TDLAS channel.
Figure 11. (a) Noise determination of CH4-TDLAS channel. (b) Noise determination of C2H2-TDLAS channel.
Sensors 26 01267 g011
Figure 12. (a) Allan variance analysis of the CH4 channel. (b) Allan variance analysis of the C2H2 channel.
Figure 12. (a) Allan variance analysis of the CH4 channel. (b) Allan variance analysis of the C2H2 channel.
Sensors 26 01267 g012
Table 1. Parameters of the MPC.
Table 1. Parameters of the MPC.
Variablesd (mm)h (mm)θ, φ (°)NOPL (m)V (mL)OPL/V (cm−2)
path 1104.94(3.13, 16.84)(−9.25, −3.2)16717.522068.50
path 2104.94(0, 19.12)(−7.55, −7.45)16817.632068.56
Table 2. Parameters of MPCs in different studies.
Table 2. Parameters of MPCs in different studies.
MPCOPL (m)OPL/V (cm−2)
Herriott cell [50]60.17
TMPC [51]1.93.74
CF-MPC [52]4.853.57
This paper35.1517.06
Table 3. Performance comparison between different spectroscopy techniques.
Table 3. Performance comparison between different spectroscopy techniques.
TechnologyMuti-Gas TypeMDL
PAS [53]CH4250 ppb @ 100 s
C2H277 ppb @ 100 s
QEPAS [54]CH4730 ppb @ 100 s
C2H21600 ppb @ 100 s
TDLAS (this paper)CH477.32 ppb @ 300 s
C2H23.50 ppb @ 300 s
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, X.; Sun, X.; Sun, H.; Wang, R.; Qiao, S.; He, Y.; Ma, Y. Highly Sensitive CH4/C2H2 Dual-Component TDLAS Sensor Based on a Dual-Channel Hexagram Multi-Pass Cell. Sensors 2026, 26, 1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26041267

AMA Style

Liang X, Sun X, Sun H, Wang R, Qiao S, He Y, Ma Y. Highly Sensitive CH4/C2H2 Dual-Component TDLAS Sensor Based on a Dual-Channel Hexagram Multi-Pass Cell. Sensors. 2026; 26(4):1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26041267

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Xinyu, Xiaorong Sun, Haiyue Sun, Runqiu Wang, Shunda Qiao, Ying He, and Yufei Ma. 2026. "Highly Sensitive CH4/C2H2 Dual-Component TDLAS Sensor Based on a Dual-Channel Hexagram Multi-Pass Cell" Sensors 26, no. 4: 1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26041267

APA Style

Liang, X., Sun, X., Sun, H., Wang, R., Qiao, S., He, Y., & Ma, Y. (2026). Highly Sensitive CH4/C2H2 Dual-Component TDLAS Sensor Based on a Dual-Channel Hexagram Multi-Pass Cell. Sensors, 26(4), 1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26041267

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop