Next Article in Journal
Bis-Pyrene-Appended Polyvinyl Chloride: Mechanosynthesis and Nitro-Explosive Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Camera–GPS Sensor Fusion for Kinematic Characterization, Microsimulation Validation, and Macroscopic Capacity Modeling of Traffic-Calming Corridors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improvements in PPP by Integrating GNSS with LEO Satellites: A Geometric Simulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Hernando-Ramiro et al. Time to First Fix Robustness of Global Navigation Satellite Systems: Comparison Study. Sensors 2025, 25, 1599

by
Carlos Hernando-Ramiro
*,
Óscar Gamallo-Palomares
,
Javier Junquera-Sánchez
and
José Antonio Gómez-Sánchez
Spanish National Institute for Aerospace Technology (INTA), Carretera de Ajalvir, km 4, 28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2026, 26(17), 5341; https://doi.org/10.3390/s26175341
Submission received: 9 July 2026 / Accepted: 13 July 2026 / Published: 24 August 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in GNSS Signal Processing and Navigation)

Error in Figure

In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 8 as published. Some of the values and, consequently, lines were wrong. The corrected Figure 8 appears below.

Error in Table

There were mistakes in Table 3 as published. Some of the values in the table were wrong. The corrected Table 3 appears below.

Text Correction

1. There was an error in Section 4.1, Paragraph 4. The content “On the other hand, its horizontal error is not significantly affected by attenuation until about 14 dB.” has been updated to “On the other hand, its horizontal error is not significantly affected by attenuation until about 12 dB.”
2. There was a typographical error in Section 4.2, Paragraph 3. The Content “However, regarding positioning accuracy, in those cases where a fix is achieved, the horizontal error obtaine is solid, providing values that are more precise than those of BeiDou, but larger than the GPS ones.” has been updated to “However, regarding positioning accuracy, in those cases where a fix is achieved, the horizontal error obtained is solid, providing values that are more precise than those of BeiDou, but larger than the GPS ones.”.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Hernando-Ramiro, C.; Gamallo-Palomares, Ó.; Junquera-Sánchez, J.; Gómez-Sánchez, J.A. Time to First Fix Robustness of Global Navigation Satellite Systems: Comparison Study. Sensors 2025, 25, 1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Figure 8. Horizontal error versus attenuation for the different GNSSs.
Figure 8. Horizontal error versus attenuation for the different GNSSs.
Sensors 26 05341 g008
Table 3. Statistical results for the horizontal error.
Table 3. Statistical results for the horizontal error.
Horizontal ErrorGNSSAttenuation (dB)
02468101214161820
Mean (m)BeiDou2.622.723.203.944.864.123.895.619.3412.214.8
Galileo 3.21 3.43 3.26 3.66 4.17 5.16 6.12 7.74 9.97 11.6 13.3
GLONASS 5.29 5.83 6.98 9.94 13.5 18.6 22.0 27.0 30.3 32.5 43.6
GPS 2.24 2.16 2.11 2.15 2.19 2.37 2.46 2.71 2.66 2.69 3.41
Standard
deviation (m)
BeiDou 1.62 1.71 2.96 5.18 7.51 3.23 2.60 5.38 17.9 19.4 20.0
Galileo 3.65 4.12 3.79 4.65 5.33 7.10 8.23 9.39 11.3 11.5 11.7
GLONASS 3.94 4.70 6.14 10.4 11.0 15.7 20.7 27.3 30.8 30.9 37.1
GPS 1.47 1.37 1.32 1.35 1.36 1.60 1.78 1.79 1.71 1.83 2.30
Minimum (m)BeiDou 0.22 0.37 0.44 0.50 0.42 0.67 0.70 0.54 0.74 0.94 2.03
Galileo 0.25 0.32 0.46 0.63 0.62 0.71 0.64 0.52 1.22 1.52 1.52
GLONASS 0.62 0.71 1.10 1.56 1.68 1.78 4.28 4.04 2.59 3.69 3.49
GPS 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.26 0.41 0.23 0.40 0.85 0.59 0.58 0.99
Maximum (m)BeiDou 11.5 10.7 26.3 48.6 66.4 21.2 13.4 32.3 163 163 163
Galileo 29.3 31.0 26.5 27.4 36.6 43.1 43.1 54.6 59.2 59.2 59.2
GLONASS 30.5 37.5 46.8 63.3 69.2 72.2 114 155 173 155 226
GPS 8.30 6.71 6.45 7.26 7.59 8.45 10.5 10.3 9.80 12.6 17.0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hernando-Ramiro, C.; Gamallo-Palomares, Ó.; Junquera-Sánchez, J.; Gómez-Sánchez, J.A. Correction: Hernando-Ramiro et al. Time to First Fix Robustness of Global Navigation Satellite Systems: Comparison Study. Sensors 2025, 25, 1599. Sensors 2026, 26, 5341. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26175341

AMA Style

Hernando-Ramiro C, Gamallo-Palomares Ó, Junquera-Sánchez J, Gómez-Sánchez JA. Correction: Hernando-Ramiro et al. Time to First Fix Robustness of Global Navigation Satellite Systems: Comparison Study. Sensors 2025, 25, 1599. Sensors. 2026; 26(17):5341. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26175341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hernando-Ramiro, Carlos, Óscar Gamallo-Palomares, Javier Junquera-Sánchez, and José Antonio Gómez-Sánchez. 2026. "Correction: Hernando-Ramiro et al. Time to First Fix Robustness of Global Navigation Satellite Systems: Comparison Study. Sensors 2025, 25, 1599" Sensors 26, no. 17: 5341. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26175341

APA Style

Hernando-Ramiro, C., Gamallo-Palomares, Ó., Junquera-Sánchez, J., & Gómez-Sánchez, J. A. (2026). Correction: Hernando-Ramiro et al. Time to First Fix Robustness of Global Navigation Satellite Systems: Comparison Study. Sensors 2025, 25, 1599. Sensors, 26(17), 5341. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26175341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop