Next Article in Journal
Methodologies for Remote Bridge Inspection—Review
Previous Article in Journal
Leveraging Reconfigurable Massive MIMO Antenna Arrays for Enhanced Wireless Connectivity in Biomedical IoT Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

MoveLab®: Validation and Development of Novel Cross-Platform Gait and Mobility Assessments Using Gold Standard Motion Capture and Clinical Standard Assessment

1
School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK
2
Agile Kinetic, Newport NP20 1GL, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2025, 25(18), 5706; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185706 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 1 July 2025 / Revised: 3 September 2025 / Accepted: 9 September 2025 / Published: 12 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Sensors)

Abstract

Wearable health assessment devices enable real-time clinical- and home-based patient monitoring. Human gait analysis is a widely accepted musculoskeletal assessment. The 30 s Sit-to-Stand (STS) and Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) are clinical frailty assessments used alongside gait analysis. This study assessed the reliability and validity of the MoveLab® (Agile Kinetic 2024) approach to measure gait spatiotemporal parameters (STPs), STS, and TUG using a waist-worn mobile phone, compared to the Gold Standard 3D marker-based motion capture (Qualisys AB, Sweden) and the Clinical Standard assessment of the STS and TUG test methods. Movement data, recorded simultaneously for 25 healthy volunteers (14 female and 11 male, Age = 31.8 ± 11.6 yrs) in a Biomechanics Laboratory using the Gold Standard system, the Clinical Standard assessments, and MoveLab®, was analyzed using Intraclass Correlation (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots (Python) to quantify the correlations, consistency, and significance across the output parameters. Comparing the methods, the STP consistency ranged from acceptable to good for all the tested parameters (ICC 0.299–0.894). The highest and lowest correlations were cycle time and terminal double support time, respectively. The TUG showed good agreement (ICC 0.757). Generally, an equal number of MoveLab® STS repetitions were observed. MoveLab® demonstrated validity and reliability for a range of key movement parameters using a pouch-worn mobile phone device in healthy adults in a controlled laboratory environment.
Keywords: gait; spatiotemporal gait parameters (STPs); STS; TUG; rehabilitation; frailty; validation; wearable; MoveLab® gait; spatiotemporal gait parameters (STPs); STS; TUG; rehabilitation; frailty; validation; wearable; MoveLab®

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Powell, K.; Amer, A.; Glavcheva-Laleva, Z.; Williams, J.; O’Flaherty Farrell, C.; Harwood, F.; Bishop, P.; Holt, C. MoveLab®: Validation and Development of Novel Cross-Platform Gait and Mobility Assessments Using Gold Standard Motion Capture and Clinical Standard Assessment. Sensors 2025, 25, 5706. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185706

AMA Style

Powell K, Amer A, Glavcheva-Laleva Z, Williams J, O’Flaherty Farrell C, Harwood F, Bishop P, Holt C. MoveLab®: Validation and Development of Novel Cross-Platform Gait and Mobility Assessments Using Gold Standard Motion Capture and Clinical Standard Assessment. Sensors. 2025; 25(18):5706. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185706

Chicago/Turabian Style

Powell, Katie, Ahmad Amer, Zornitza Glavcheva-Laleva, Jenny Williams, Caomhnad O’Flaherty Farrell, Finchley Harwood, Peter Bishop, and Catherine Holt. 2025. "MoveLab®: Validation and Development of Novel Cross-Platform Gait and Mobility Assessments Using Gold Standard Motion Capture and Clinical Standard Assessment" Sensors 25, no. 18: 5706. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185706

APA Style

Powell, K., Amer, A., Glavcheva-Laleva, Z., Williams, J., O’Flaherty Farrell, C., Harwood, F., Bishop, P., & Holt, C. (2025). MoveLab®: Validation and Development of Novel Cross-Platform Gait and Mobility Assessments Using Gold Standard Motion Capture and Clinical Standard Assessment. Sensors, 25(18), 5706. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185706

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop