Innovative Technologies to Improve Occupational Safety in Mining and Construction Industries—Part I
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Inspection Robots
3.1.1. Mining Engineering
3.1.2. Civil Engineering
3.2. Internet of Things and Sensors
3.2.1. Mining Engineering
3.2.2. Civil Engineering
3.3. Artificial Intelligence
3.3.1. Mining Engineering
3.3.2. Civil Engineering
4. Evaluation of Modern Technologies for Improving Occupational Safety
4.1. General Characteristics and Future Research Directions
4.1.1. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Inspection Robots
- It seems important to develop autonomous navigation and mapping systems in environments without a GPS signal, which will enable the effective use of robots in spaces without this signal;
- It is necessary to improve the methods of real-time spatial data analysis, including the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms capable of automatic detection of threats and violations of security procedures;
- Research on the integration of different measurement platforms (e.g., UAVs, wheeled robots, and stationary devices) within a single safety management system, which will allow for a more holistic approach to monitoring and prevention;
- Research in the field of practical pilot implementations, allowing for a full assessment of the adaptability of UAVs and inspection robots in real mining conditions;
- Further research on user acceptance, psychological impact, and human–UAV/inspection robot interaction is warranted to ensure effective implementation and the maximisation of occupational safety benefits.
4.1.2. Internet of Things and Sensors
- Work on the development of autonomous decision-making systems, based on artificial intelligence and machine learning, in order to create systems capable not only of detecting threats but also of predicting their occurrence well in advance of time based on patterns of historical and current data;
- Research on improving the reliability and miniaturisation of sensors resistant to extreme environmental conditions;
- The development of solutions dedicated to industrial IoT, taking into account the specifics of critical infrastructure and ensuring protection of data integrity in real time;
- Interdisciplinary research covering social, legal, and organisational aspects of the implementation of new technologies—models of personal data management and transparent technology implementation policies that take into account the protection of employees’ privacy while increasing their security are necessary.
4.1.3. Artificial Intelligence
- Developing AI algorithms to better understand and verify the decisions made by AI systems, which will increase their trust and enable more effective crisis management;
- Conducting interdisciplinary research on the integration of AI with work ergonomics, psychology and social engineering, which will enable the creation of more user-friendly systems supporting safety;
- Developing standards and legal norms for accountability for decisions made via autonomous systems, as well as defining a framework for auditing and certifying AI-based solutions in high-risk environments.
4.2. Inter-Technological Integration—Opportunities and Limitations
4.2.1. Opportunities for the Use and Mixing of Modern Technologies
4.2.2. Limitations on the Use and Mixing of Modern Technologies
4.2.3. Practical Ways to Reduce the Risks Facing the Use and Mixing of Modern Technologies
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
VR | Virtual reality |
OSH | Occupational safety and health |
UAVs | Unmanned aerial vehicles |
IR | Inspection robots |
IoT | Internet of Things |
AI | Artificial intelligence |
CSIR | The Council for Scientific and Industrial Research |
CMI | The Center for Mining Innovation |
AR | Augmented reality |
BIM | Building information modelling |
OSHA | Occupational Safety and Health Administration |
PAD | Personal alarm device |
NIOSH | The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health |
SMAC | Smart monitoring and control |
SMRD | Spokane Mining Research Division |
WSN | Wireless sensor network |
AMS | Air-monitoring system |
LED | Light-emitting diode |
UWB | Ultra-wide band |
GIS | Geographic information system |
FEM | Finite element method |
PPE | Personal protective equipment |
CPE | Collective protective equipment |
References
- Stewart, J.M.; Malatji, S.M. Development of the MOSH Leading Practice Adoption System-a science-based system for managing behaviour change. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2018, 118, 259–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bęś, P.; Strzałkowski, P. Analysis of the Effectiveness of Safety Training Methods. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strzałkowski, P.; Bęś, P.; Szóstak, M.; Napiórkowski, M. Application of Virtual Reality (VR) Technology in Mining and Civil Engineering. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.Q.; Chan, T.H.; Afshar, S.V. A neural network for forward and inverse nonlinear Fourier transforms for fiber optic communication. Neurocomputing 2024, 176, 110971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leso, V.; Fontana, L.; Iavicoli, I. The occupational health and safety dimension of Industry 4.0. Med. Lav. 2018, 110, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arana-Landín, G.; Laskurain-Iturbe, I.; Iturrate, M.; Landeta-Manzano, B. Assessing the influence of Industry 4.0 technologies on occupational health and safety. Heliyon 2023, 9, e13720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Negi, P.; Pathani, A.; Bhatt, B.C.; Swami, S.; Singh, R.; Gehlot, A.; Thakur, A.K.; Gupta, L.R.; Priyadarshi, N.; Twala, B.; et al. Integration of Industry 4.0 Technologies in Fire and Safety Management. Fire 2024, 7, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schodowski, E. Wireless technology offers mining operations improvements. Min. Eng. 2009, 61, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
- Gatti, U.C.; Migliaccio, G.C.; Bogus, S.M.; Schneider, S. An exploratory study of the relationship between construction workforce physical strain and task level productivity. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2014, 32, 548–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sam-Aggrey, H. Assessment of the impacts of new mining technologies: Recommendations on the way forward. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 2020, 245, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zvarivadza, T.; Onifade, M.; Dayo-Olupona, O.; Said, K.O.; Githiria, J.M.; Genc, B.; Celik, T. On the impact of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)–Mining sector perspectives. Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 2024, 38, 771–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chenya, L.; Aminudin, E.; Mohd, S.; Yap, L.S. Intelligent Risk Management in Construction Projects: Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 72936–72954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, C.-L.; Dzeng, R.-J. Construction safety training via e-Learning: Learning effectiveness and user. Comput. Educ. 2010, 55, 858–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.J.; Wang, X.; Love, P.; Li, H.; Kang, S.C. Virtual Reality for the Built Environment: A Critical Review of Recent Advances. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2013, 18, 279–305. [Google Scholar]
- Armstrong, M.B.; Landers, R.N. Gamification of Employee Training and Development. Int. J. Train. Dev. 2018, 22, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Yi, W.; Chi, H.-L.; Wang, X.; Chan, A.P.C. A critical review of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) applications in construction safety. Autom. Constr. 2018, 86, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, N. Desk research. In How to Do Research: The Practical Guide to Designing and Managing Research Projects; Facet: London, UK, 2006; pp. 106–111. [Google Scholar]
- Topolewski, S.; Górnikiewicz, M.; Stawarz, P. The literature review and the “desk research” methods in studies conducted in social sciences with particular emphasis on security, political, and international relations studies. Stud. Wsch. 2023, 2, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bednarowska, Z. Desk research–wykorzystanie potencjału danych zastanych w prowadzeniu badań marketingowych i społecznych [Desk research-exploiting the potential of secondary data in market and social research]. Zesz. Prasozn. 2013, 56, 60–74. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, R.K. Methodological and Theoretical Rigor in Desk Research. ResearchGate. 2024. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386642850_Methodological_and_Theoretical_Rigor_in_Desk_Research (accessed on 19 May 2025).
- Barros, L.G.D.; Cid, A.L.M.; Domingues, J.D.; Medeiros, V.S.; Pessin, G.; Becker, M. An Adaptable Paw Design for Quadruped Robots Operation in Mining Environments. In Proceedings of the 2023 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS), Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR), and Workshop on Robotics in Education (WRE), Salvador, Brazil, 9–11 October 2023; pp. 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cunha, F.; Youcef-Toumi, K. Ultra-Wideband Radar for Robust Inspection Drone in Underground Coal Mines. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 21–25 May 2018; pp. 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinto, M.F.; Honorio, L.M.; Melo, A.; Marcato, A.L.M. A Robotic Cognitive Architecture for Slope and Dam Inspections. Sensors 2020, 20, 4579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramirez, J.; Segovia, A.; Escobar, M.; Quiroz, D.; Cuellar, F. Practical Applications of a Vision-based Robot for Security and Safety of Tailings Tunnels Infrastructure in the Mining Industry. In Proceedings of the 2021 7th International Conference on Control, Automation and Robotics (ICCAR), Singapore, 23–26 April 2021; pp. 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-del-Solar, J.; Vallejos, P.; Asenjo, R.; Correa, M.; Parra-Tsunekawa, I.; Mascaro, M. Robotics research in Chile: Addressing the needs of the local mining industry at the Advanced Mining Technology Center. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2016, 4, 1729881416682695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaughan, J. Modeling and control of rocking in cable-riding systems. In Proceedings of the 2013 9th Asian Control Conference (ASCC), Istanbul, Turkey, 23–26 June 2013; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nordström, S.; Stathoulopoulos, N.; Dahlquist, N.; Lindqvist, B.; Tevetzidis, I.; Kanellakis, C.; Nikolakopoulos, G. Safety Inspections and Gas Monitoring in Hazardous Mining Areas Shortly After Blasting Using Autonomous UAVs. J. Field Robot. 2025, 42, 2076–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadhasivam, S.; Prakash, G.; Ranjith Kumar, G.; Nazeeya Anjum, N. Dynamic Mapping in Confined Spaces: Robotic SLAM with Human Detection and Path Planning. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Automation, Computing and Renewable Systems (ICACRS), Pudukkottai, India, 11–13 December 2023; pp. 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, J. CSIR centre for mining innovation and the mine safety platform robot. In Proceedings of the 2012 5th Robotics and Mechatronics Conference of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26–27 November 2012; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teleka, R.; Green, J.; Dickens, J. CSIR center for mining innovation and the simulated test stope. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Africon Conference, Pointe aux Piments, Mauritius, 9–12 September 2013; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.; Bao, T.D.; Bui, X.N.; Pham, V.V.; Nguyen, D.A.; Do, N.H.; Hoa, L.T.; Le, Q.T.; Le, T.N. Measuring and Predicting Blast-Induced Flyrock Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Lévy Flight Technique-Based Jaya Optimization Algorithm Integrated with Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System. Nat. Resour. Res. 2025, 34, 1773–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Layek, S.; Villuri, V.G.K.; Koner, R.; Chand, K. Rainfall & Seismological Dump Slope Stability Analysis on Active Mine Waste Dump Slope with UAV. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2022, 2022, 5858400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, H.; Ma, G.; Liu, P.; Qin, X.; Wu, C.; Lu, J. Multi-Factor Analysis on the Stability of High Slopes in Open-Pit Mines. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 5940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.; Gong, S.; Huo, Z.; Li, H.; Ding, X. Application of Comprehensive Geophysical Prospecting Method in the Exploration of Coal Mined-Out Areas. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2019, 2019, 2368402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, B.P.; Raval, S. Remote sensing to advance sustainable mining practices. In Proceedings of the 38th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing–Space Applications: Touching Human Lives, ACRS 2017, New Delhi, India, 23–27 October 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rysbekov, K.B.; Kyrgizbayeva, D.M.; Miletenko, N.A.; Kuandykov, T.A. Integrated Monitoring of the Area of Zhilandy Deposits. Eurasian Min. 2024, 41, 3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatfield, M.C.; Nelson, H.; Holst, B.C.; Nelson, T.J. Enhancing Professional Interdisciplinary Engineering Skills Through the Application of Unmanned Aircraft Systems to Solve Real-World Remote Sensing Missions. In Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 26–29 June 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, W.; Ren, H.; Sui, T.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, Z. A drone- and field-based investigation of the land degradation and soil erosion at an opencast coal mine dump after 5 years’ evolution of natural processes. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 2022, 9, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alias, M.F.; Udin, W.S. Identifying the potential use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) technique in mining area for geohazards and safety control. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 842, 012009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, Z.; Lu, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, G. Research and application of bolt defects detection technology based on machine learning. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 2085, 012012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Song, Z.; Zhi, B.; Pu, J.; Meng, C. Intelligent identification of rock mass structural based on point cloud deep learning technology. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 456, 139340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiao, H. Research on the Application of Digital Twin Model Calculation and Updating Methods in Mining Engineering. In Advanced Intelligent Technologies and Sustainable Society; Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies; Springer: Singapore, 2024; Volume 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Somanagoudar, A.G.; Mérida, W. Weather-aware energy management for unmanned aerial vehicles: A machine learning application with global data integration. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2025, 139, 109596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobrucali, E.; Demirkesen, S.; Sadikoglu, E.; Zhang, C.; Damci, A. Investigating the impact of emerging technologies on construction safety performance. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2022, 31, 1322–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yap, J.B.H.; Lee, K.P.H.; Wang, C. Safety enablers using emerging technologies in construction projects: Empirical study in Malaysia. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2021, 21, 1414–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojha, A.; Liu, Y.; Shayesteh, S.; Jebelli, H.; Sitzabee, W.E. Affordable Multiagent Robotic System for Same-Level Fall Hazard Detection in Indoor Construction Environments. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 2023, 37, 04022042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojha, A.; Liu, Y.; Shayesteh, S.; Jebelli, H. Developing an Affordable Robotic System for Automated Fall Hazard Detection and Localization in Indoor Construction Environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering, Orlando, FL, USA, 12–14 September 2021; pp. 1041–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.-F.R.; Chien, T.-W. Intelligent Robot for Worker Safety Surveillance: Deep Learning Perception and Visual Navigation. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Intelligent Systems (ARIS), Taipei, Taiwan, 19–21 August 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanson, J.S. Drone use in the construction industry leads to integration into the current civil and construction engineering technology curriculum. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration (CIEC), New Orleans, LA, USA, 30 January–1 February 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Górski, M.; Grzyb, K.; Zając, J. Robotic devices for Structural Health Monitoring. Struct. Concr. 2025, 25, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franco, J.A.B.; Domingues, A.M.; Africano, N.A.; Deus, R.M.; Battistelle, R.A.G. Sustainability in the Civil Construction Sector Supported by Industry 4.0 Technologies: Challenges and Opportunities. Infrastructures 2022, 7, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bae, J.; Lee, J.; Jang, A.; Ju, Y.K.; Park, M.J. SMART SKY EYE System for Preliminary Structural Safety Assessment of Buildings Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Sensors 2022, 22, 2762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guptaa, S.; Nairb, S. Challenges in capturing and processing UAV-based photographic data from construction sites. In Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Kitakyushu, Japan, 27–28 October 2020; pp. 911–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, H.; Lee, S.-C.; Bae, W.; Kim, J.; Seo, S. Towards UAVs in Construction: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions for Monitoring and Inspection. Drones 2023, 7, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pena, P.F.; Isaac, M.S.A.; Gifu, D.; Ragab, A.R. Nuntius Helicopter: A New Drone in Construction Industry. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2024, 246, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Francesco, F.; Ciro, B.; Luciano, R.; Matteo, M. The response of the rescue system to large scale emergencies—A case study: The collapse of the Morancli bridge Part 2 of 2: Technologies for rescue service. In Proceedings of the 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and the 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference, Venice, Italy, 1–5 November 2020; pp. 2148–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hariri-Ardebili, M.A.; Mahdavi, G.; Nuss, L.K.; Lall, U. The role of artificial intelligence and digital technologies in dam engineering: Narrative review and outlook. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, 126, 106813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Wang, L.; Chen, W. Research on optimization of visual navigation algorithm for real-time obstacle avoidance of UAV moving target tracking. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 1st International Conference on Civil Aviation Safety and Information Technology (ICCASIT), Kunming, China, 17–19 October 2019; pp. 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harper, C.M.; Mehany, M.; Parajuli, M. Construction Research Congress 2022. In Construction Research Congress 2022: Health and Safety, Workforce, and Education–Selected Papers; American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE): Reston, VA, USA, 2022; pp. 90–99. [Google Scholar]
- Flores-Castañeda, R.O.; Olaya-Cotera, S.; López-Porras, M.; Tarmeño-Juscamaita, E.; Iparraguirre-Villanueva, O. Technological advances and trends in the mining industry: A systematic review. Miner. Econ. 2024, 38, 221–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadeghi, S.; Soltanmohammadlou, N.; Nasirzadeh, F. Applications of wireless sensor networks to improve occupational safety and health in underground mines. J. Saf. Res. 2022, 83, 8–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jobes, C.; Carr, J.; DuCarme, J.; Patts, J. Determining proximity warning and action zones for a magnetic proximity detection system. In Proceedings of the IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, USA, 9–13 October 2011; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruff, T.M. Application of radar to detect pedestrian workers near mining equipment. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2001, 6, 798–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ruff, T. Evaluation of a radar-based proximity warning system for off-highway dump trucks. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2006, 38, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruff, T. Feasibility of using intelligent video for machine safety applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Industry Applications Society, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 5–9 October 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruff, T.; Steele, J. Recent advances in proximity warning technology for surface mining equipment. Int. J. Min. Eng. 2004, 316, 68–72. [Google Scholar]
- McNinch, M.; Parks, D.; Jacksha, R.; Miller, A. Leveraging IIoT to Improve Machine Safety in the Mining Industry. Min. Metall. Explor. 2019, 36, 675–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reyes, M.A.; King, G.W.; Miller, G.G. Wireless machine guard monitoring system. In Proceedings of the IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 7–11 October 2012; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reyes, M.A.; King, G.W.; Miller, G.G. Intelligent machine guard monitoring: A wireless system to improve miner safety. IEEE Ind. Appl. Mag. 2014, 20, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carr, J.L.; Jobes, C.C.; Li, J. Development of a method to determine operator location using electromagnetic proximity detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robotic and Sensors Environments (ROSE), Phoenix, AZ, USA, 15–16 October 2010; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Choi, Y. Smart Helmet-Based Proximity Warning System to Improve Occupational Safety on the Road Using Image Sensor and Artificial Intelligence. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aksüt, G.; Eren, T.; Alakaş, H.M. Using wearable technological devices to improve workplace health and safety: An assessment on a sector base with multi-criteria decision-making methods. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2024, 15, 102423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aqueveque, P.; Gutierrez, C.; Saavedra, F.; Pino, E.J.; Morales, A.S.; Wiechmann, E. Monitoring physiological variables of mining workers at high altitude. In Proceedings of the IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, Portland, OR, USA, 2–6 October 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubaniewicz, T.H.; Kovalchik, P.G.; Scott, L.W.; Fuller, M.A. Distributed measurement of conductor temperatures in mine trailing cables using fiber-optic technology. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 1998, 34, 395–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Homce, G.T.; Cawley, J.C.; Yenchek, M.R.; Sacks, H.K. An alarm to warn of overhead power line contact by mobile equipment. In Proceedings of the Conference Record of the 2001 IEEE Industry Applications Conference: 36th IAS Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, USA, 30 September–4 October 2001; Volume 2, pp. 1376–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yantek, D.S.; Yan, L.; Damiano, N.W.; Reyes, M.A.; Srednicki, J.R. A test method for evaluating the thermal environment of underground coal mine refuge alternatives. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2019, 29, 343–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, J.C.; Franks, R.A.; Friel, G.F.; Yian, L. CO Dispersion from a Coal Fire in a Mine Entry. In Proceedings of the 11th U.S./North American Mine Ventilation Symposium, State College, PA, USA, 5–7 June 2006; pp. 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rowland, J.H.; Yuan, L.; Thomas, R.A. Evaluation of Carbon Monoxide and Smoke Sensors at a Low Ventilation Velocity. Min. Metall. Explor. 2021, 38, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.; Yuan, L.; Thomas, R.; Bahrami, D.; Rowland, J. Determination of a mine fire intensity using atmospheric monitoring system in a ventilation network. In Proceedings of the SME Annual Conference and Expo, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 23–26 February 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Tutak, M.; Brodny, J. Predicting Methane Concentration in Longwall Regions Using Artificial Neural Networks. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Volkwein, J.C.; Hansen, A.D.A.; Hill, J. New sensor for continuous tracking of diesel particulate matter in mines to optimize mine ventilation systems. In SME Annual Conference and Expo: The Future for Mining in a Data-Driven World; Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration: Englewood, CO, USA, 2016; pp. 128–131. [Google Scholar]
- Litton, C.D. Evaluation of smoke detectors for use in underground mines. In Proceedings of the SME Annual Meeting and Exhibit and CMA’s 111th National Western Mining Conference, Denver, CO, USA, 22–25 February 2009; Volume 2, pp. 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Man, C.; Harris, M.; Weiss, E.S. Analysis of post-explosion residues for estimating flame travel during coal dust deflagrations. Sci. Technol. Energ. Mater. 2011, 72, 136–140. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Sun, Z. Thermal dynamic system of the outcrop coal fire under the control of multi-ventilation power factors and its application. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2013, 5, 248–255. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, L.; Yuan, L.; Thomas, R.; Bahrami, D.; Rowland, J. An Improved Method to Calculate the Heat Release Rate of a Mine Fire in Underground Mines. Min. Metall. Explor. 2020, 37, 1941–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raj, K.V.; Jacksha, R.D.; Sunderman, C.B.; Pritchard, C.J. Smart monitoring and control system test apparatus. Trans. Soc. Min. Metall. Explor. 2018, 344, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jha, A.; Verburg, A.; Tukkaraja, P. Internet of Things–Based Command Center to Improve Emergency Response in Underground Mines. Saf. Health Work 2022, 13, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W. Comprehensive colliery safety monitoring system design based on wireless sensor network. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2014, 6, 647–651. [Google Scholar]
- Devi, Y.S.; Dheeraj, G.S.; Vamsi, V.N. A Novel Method to Detect the Amount of Silica Levels in Mines. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 2019, 8, 1022–1025. [Google Scholar]
- Wolfe, C.; Cauda, E.; Yekich, M.; Patts, J. Real-Time Dust Monitoring in Occupational Environments: A Case Study on Using Low-Cost Dust Monitors for Enhanced Data Collection and Analysis. Min. Metall. Explor. 2024, 41, 1709–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, K.; Kardous, C.A.; Shaw, P.B.; Kim, B.; Mechling, J.A.; Amanda, S. The potential use of a NIOSH sound level meter smart device application in mining operations. Noise Control Eng. J. 2019, 67, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sunderman, C.; Richardson, J.; Raffaldi, M. Instrumentation and data acquisition for dynamic testing of ground support. In Proceedings of the IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1–5 October 2017; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gangrade, V.; Slaker, B.; Collins, D.; Braganza, S.; Winfield, J. Investigating seismicity surrounding an excavation boundary in a highly stressed dipping underground limestone mine. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining (ICGCM), Taiyuan, China, 11–13 October 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Klemetti, T.; Oyler, D.; Molinda, G. Time dependent roof deterioration at a central Ohio coal mine. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining, Morgantown, WV, USA, 28–30 July 2009; pp. 248–255. [Google Scholar]
- Murphy, M.; Slaker, B.; Iannacchione, A.; Rash, G.; Van Dyke, M.; Buchan, G.; Minoski, T.; McElhinney, D.; Winfield, J. Development of a comprehensive pillar and roof monitoring system at a steeply dipping underground limestone mine. In Proceedings of the SME Annual Conference and Expo 2018 and 91st Annual Meeting of the SME-MN Section, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 25–28 February 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Slaker, B.; Gangrade, V.; Murphy, M.M.; Winfield, J. Seismic Data Interpretation of a Development Pillar at a Steeply Dipping Underground Limestone Mine. In Proceedings of the 52nd US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Seattle, WA, USA, 17–20 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Ge, M. Acoustic emission/microseismic source location analysis for a limestone mine exhibiting high horizontal stresses. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2008, 45, 720–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garretson, J.; Hobart, C.; Salton, J. Gemini-Scout rescue robot. In Proceedings of the AUVSI Unmanned Systems North America Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 16–19 August 2011; pp. 1385–1399. [Google Scholar]
- Hennage, D.H.; Nopola, J.R.; Haugen, B.D. Fully Autonomous Drone for Underground Use. In Proceedings of the 53rd U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, New York City, NY, USA, 23–26 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Cerruti, C.; Ferrari, M.; Ferrari, A.; Magurno, G.; Taurino, R. Application of digital technologies and IoT system to enhance safety–Smart safety project. In Proceedings of the SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Environment, and Sustainability, Online, 27–31 July 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muñoz Martinez, C.J.; Castro Salguero, R.; Palomares, R.; Cornejo, J. Mechatronics Development of Terrestrial Mobile Robot for Exploring and Monitoring Environmental Parameters at Mine Analogue Sites using IoT Platform. In Proceedings of the IEEE XXVII International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computing (INTERCON), Lima, Peru, 3–5 September 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacksha, R.; Raj, K.V. Assessing the Feasibility of a Commercially Available Wireless Internet of Things System to Improve Conveyor Safety. Min. Metall. Explor. 2021, 38, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, Y.S.; Lee, J.Y.; Yoon, Y.G.; Oh, T.K. Effectiveness Analysis for Smart Construction Safety Technology (SCST) by Test Bed Operation on Small- and Medium-Sized Construction Sites. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sherratt, F.; Wong, P.; Sherratt, S. What we really know about wearable sensor technologies for construction OSHW. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Manag. Procure. Law 2024, 177, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nath, N.D.; Akhavian, R.; Behzadan, A.H. Ergonomic analysis of construction worker’s body postures using wearable mobile sensors. Appl. Ergon. 2017, 62, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahanbanifar, S.; Akhavian, R. Evaluation of wearable sensors to quantify construction workers’ muscle force: An ergonomic analysis. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Gothenburg, Sweden, 9–12 December 2018; pp. 3921–3929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Y.; Li, H.; Yang, X.; Umer, W. Estimating construction workers’ physical workload by fusing computer vision and smart insole technologies. In Proceedings of the ISARC 2018–35th Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Berlin, Germany, 20–25 July 2018; pp. 1212–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Y.; Li, H.; Yang, X.; Kong, L.; Luo, X.; Wong, A.Y.L. An automatic and non-invasive physical fatigue assessment method for construction workers. Autom. Constr. 2019, 103, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breloff, S.P.; Dutta, A.; Dai, F.; Sinsel, E.W.; Warren, C.M.; Ning, X.; Wu, J.Z. Assessing work-related risk factors for musculoskeletal knee disorders in construction roofing tasks. Appl. Ergon. 2019, 81, 102901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, G.; Bae, J.; Jacobs, J.V.; Lee, S. Wearable heart rate sensing and critical power-based whole-body fatigue monitoring in the field. Appl. Ergon. 2024, 121, 104358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teizer, J.J. Wearable, wireless identification sensing platform: Self-Monitoring Alert and Reporting Technology for Hazard Avoidance and Training (SmartHat). Electron. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2015, 20, 295–312. [Google Scholar]
- Umer, W.; Siddiqui, M.K. Use of Ultra Wide Band Real-Time Location System on Construction Jobsites: Feasibility Study and Deployment Alternatives. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sholihah, Q.; Hardiningtyas, D.; Hulukati, S.A.; Galisong Idwan, D.; Kuncoro, W.; Budiarti, R.P.N. Analysis of Internet-Based Smart Safety Helmet Systems in Occupational Health and Safety Implementation. South East. Eur. J. Public Health 2024, 23, 256–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, C.; Sakhakarmi, S.; Kim, K.; Park, J. Scaffolding modelling for real-time monitoring using a strain sensing approach. In Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Berlin, Germany, 20–25 July 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panuwatwanich, K.; Roongsrisoothiwong, N.; Petcharayuthapant, K.; Dummanonda, S.; Mohamed, S. Ambient Intelligence to Improve Construction Site Safety: Case of High-Rise Building in Thailand. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zeng, S.; Powers, J.R.; Newbraugh, B.H. Effectiveness of a worker-worn electric-field sensor to detect power-line proximity and electrical-contact. J. Saf. Res. 2010, 41, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabatabaee, S.; Mohandes, S.R.; Ahmed, R.R.; Mahdiyar, A.; Arashpour, M.; Zayed, T.; Ismail, S. Investigating the Barriers to Applying the Internet-of-Things-Based Technologies to Construction Site Safety Management. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ammad, S.; Sherif, M.; Steward, R.; Saad, S.; Altaf, M.; Qureshi, A.H. Fall Prevention Technique Through IOT Technology with Occupational Safety in Infrastructure Projects. In Proceedings of the 2024 ASU International Conference in Emerging Technologies for Sustainability and Intelligent Systems (ICETSIS), Manama, Bahrain, 28–29 January 2024; pp. 1947–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thirugnanasammandamoorthi, P.; Choi, J.-H. Improvements on Integrated Health and Safety Management System based on Wi-Pose to increase Productivity. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), 20–22 October 2021; pp. 1766–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Z.; Rahman, M.A.; Hai, T.; Yao, L.; Du, P.; Yaseen, Z.M. Need for developing a security robot-based risk management for emerging practices in the workplace using the Advanced Human-Robot Collaboration Model. Work 2021, 68, 825–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imam, M.; Baïna, K.; Tabii, Y.; Ressami, E.M.; Adlaoui, Y.; Boufousse, S.; Benzakour, I.; Abdelwahed, E.H. Integrating real-time pose estimation and PPE detection with cutting-edge deep learning for enhanced safety and rescue operations in the mining industry. Neurocomputing 2025, 618, 129080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sattari, F.; Macciotta, R.; Kurian, D.; Lefsrud, L. Application of Bayesian network and artificial intelligence to reduce accident/incident rates in oil & gas companies. Saf. Sci. 2021, 133, 104981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, X.; Shu, X.; Fu, G.; Shen, S.; Jia, Q.; Hu, J.; Wu, Z. Accident causes data-driven coal and gas outburst accidents prevention: Application of data mining and machine learning in accident path mining and accident case-based deduction. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2022, 162, 891–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyder, Z.; Siau, K.; Nah, F. Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Autonomous Technologies in Mining Industry. J. Database Manag. 2019, 30, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yang, H.; Yang, L. Artificial intelligence applications in the development of autonomous vehicles: A survey. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 2020, 7, 315–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalidass, S.K.; Ravi, J.; Mohan, P.K.; Senthil, G.; Govindarajulu, C. Evaluation of fire risk assessment in Chennai construction sites using artificial intelligence and BIM: An agenda for the future. AIP Conf. Proc. 2023, 2790, 020018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koc, K. Role of National Conditions in Occupational Fatal Accidents in the Construction Industry Using Interpretable Machine Learning Approach. J. Manag. Eng. 2023, 39, 04023037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, U.; Arteaga, C.; Park, J.W. Comparative Analysis of Cognitive Agreement between Human Analysts and Generative AI in Construction Safety Risk Assessment. In Proceedings of the 41st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2024), Lille, France, 3–7 June 2024; pp. 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, Y.; Lu, W.; Xue, F.; Liu, D.; Chen, K.; Fang, D.; Anumba, C. Towards the “third wave”: An SCO-enabled occupational health and safety management system for construction. Saf. Sci. 2019, 111, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, N.H.; Nguyen, T.B.; Le, H.P.; Luong, V.H. Moving Element Method in the Dynamic Analysis of Functionally Graded Material Plates Subjected to Thermal Loads and Resting on a Variable Stiffness Foundation. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Sustainable Civil Engineering and Architecture (ICSCEA 2023); Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering; Reddy, J.N., Wang, C.M., Luong, V.H., Le, A.T., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2024; Volume 442, pp. 1449–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uddin, S.M.J.; Albert, A.; Ovid, A.; Alsharef, A. Leveraging ChatGPT to Aid Construction Hazard Recognition and Support Safety Education and Training. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X.; Li, R.Y.M.; Crabbe, M.J.C.; Sukpascharoen, K. Can a chatbot enhance hazard awareness in the construction industry? Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 993700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray, S.J.; Teizer, J. Dynamic blindspots measurement for construction equipment operators. Saf. Sci. 2016, 85, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Z.; Wu, H.; Wang, M.; Cheng, J.C.P. An Innovative Approach for Detecting Bridge Defects Based on UAV Imagery in Low-Light Environments. In Proceedings of the 30th EG-ICE International Conference on Intelligent Computing in Engineering, London, UK, 4–7 July 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, A.; Ferramosca, M.L.; Ivaki, N.; Madeira, H. Classifying Fault Category and Severity of UAV Flight Controllers’ Reported Issues. In Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS), Venice, Italy, 23–25 November 2022; pp. 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, A.; Maity, A.; Gupta, S.K.S.; Lamrani, I. Statistical Conformance Checking of Aviation Cyber-Physical Systems by Mining Physics Guided Models. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA, 4–11 March 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garzia, F.; Borghini, F.; Castagnolo, A.; Lombardi, M.; Ramalingam, S. Emotional analysis of safeness and risk perception of drones during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. In Proceedings of the International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, Hatfield, UK, 11–15 October 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Remenyte-Prescott, R.; Andrews, J.D.; Chung, P.W.H.; Downes, C.G. A reliability analysis and decision making process for autonomous systems. In Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications; CRC Press: London, UK, 2009; Volume 3, pp. 1739–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bassi, E. From Here to 2023: Civil Drones Operations and the Setting of New Legal Rules for the European Single Sky. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2020, 100, 493–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heikkila, E.; Tiusanen, R.; Oz, E. Towards requirements for third-party assessments in the Specific Operations Risk Assessment process. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Warsaw, Poland, 6–9 June 2023; pp. 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, T.; He, Z. A Survey on the Regulation Development of Civil Unmanned Aircraft System. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Aviation Safety and Information Technology, Weihai, China, 14–16 October 2020; pp. 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.; Liao, X.; Tan, J.; Ye, H.; Lu, H. Recent Research Progress of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Regulation Policies and Technologies in Urban Low Altitude. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 74175–74194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manzoor, B.; Charef, R.; Antwi-Afari, M.F.; Alotaibi, K.S.; Harirchian, E. Revolutionizing Construction Safety: Unveiling the Digital Potential of Building Information Modeling (BIM). Buildings 2025, 15, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, F.; González García, M.d.N.; Poças Martins, J. BIM for Safety: Applying Real-Time Monitoring Technologies to Prevent Falls from Height in Construction. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narayana, T.L.; Venkatesh, C.; Kiran, A.; Kumar, A.; Khan, S.B.; Almusharraf, A.; Quasim, M.T. Advances in real time smart monitoring of environmental parameters using IoT and sensors. Heliyon 2024, 10, e28195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shahid, S.; Brown, D.J.; Wright, P.; Khasawneh, A.M.; Taylor, B.; Kaiwartya, O. Innovations in Air Quality Monitoring: Sensors, IoT and Future Research. Sensors 2025, 25, 2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.M.; Alrasheed, K.A.; Waqar, A.; Almujibah, H.; Benjeddou, O. Internet of things (IoT) for safety and efficiency in construction building site operations. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 28914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pech, M.; Vrchota, J.; Bednář, J. Predictive Maintenance and Intelligent Sensors in Smart Factory: Review. Sensors 2021, 21, 1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murtaza, A.A.; Saher, A.; Zafar, M.H.; Moosavi, S.K.R.; Aftab, M.F.; Sanfilippo, F. Paradigm shift for predictive maintenance and condition monitoring from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: A systematic review, challenges and case study. Results Eng. 2024, 24, 102935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onifade, M.; Said, K.O.; Shivute, A.P. Safe mining operations through technological advancement. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 175, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aruna, M.; Vardhan, H.; Tripathi, A.K.; Parida, S.; Raja Sekhar Reddy, N.V.; Sivalingam, K.M.; Yingqiu, L.; Elumalai, P.V. Enhancing safety in surface mine blasting operations with IoT based ground vibration monitoring and prediction system integrated with machine learning. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 3999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazhar, T.; Talpur, D.B.; Shloul, T.A.; Ghadi, Y.Y.; Haq, I.; Ullah, I.; Ouahada, K.; Hamam, H. Analysis of IoT Security Challenges and Its Solutions Using Artificial Intelligence. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, U.; Ahmed, I.; Bashir, A.K.; Shaukat, K. A Critical Cybersecurity Analysis and Future Research Directions for the Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Review. Sensors 2023, 23, 4117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.; Seong, S.; Park, S.; Kim, M.; Kim, H.Y. Multi-label material and human risk factors recognition model for construction site safety management. J. Saf. Res. 2024, 91, 354–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abioye, S.O.; Oyedele, L.O.; Akanbi, L.; Ajayi, A.; Delgado, J.M.D.; Bilal, M.; Akinade, O.O.; Ahmed, A. Artificial intelligence in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities and future challenges. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 44, 103299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Helaly, M. Artificial Intelligence and Occupational Health and Safety, Benefits and Drawbacks. Med. Lav. 2024, 115, e2024014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corrigan, C.C.; Ikonnikova, S.A. A review of the use of AI in the mining industry: Insights and ethical considerations for multi-objective optimization. Extr. Ind. Soc. 2024, 17, 101440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Wang, B.; Sheng, J.; Dong, K.; Li, Z.; Hu, Y. A Resource Service Model in the Industrial IoT System Based on Transparent Computing. Sensors 2018, 18, 981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guzman, N.H.C.; Mezovari, A.G. Design of IoT-based Cyber–Physical Systems: A Driverless Bulldozer Prototype. Information 2019, 10, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phong, N.D.; Tuyen, U.Q.; Osiński, P. Risk Warning Systems for Underground Mining Using Iot Solutions: A Case Study. Int. J. GEOMATE 2024, 27, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Birhane, G.E.; Zhu, J.; Geng, J. Mining Employees Safety and the Application of Information Technology in Coal Mining: Review. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 709987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vlachos, M.; Pavlopoulos, L.; Georgakopoulos, A.; Tsimiklis, G.; Amditis, A. A Robust End-to-End IoT System for Supporting Workers in Mining Industries. Sensors 2024, 24, 3317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; He, X. Overview of Applications of the Sensor Technologies for Construction Machinery. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 110324–110335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niloy, M.A.K.; Shama, A.; Chakrabortty, R.K.; Ryan, M.J.; Badal, F.R.; Tasneem, Z.; Ahmed, M.H.; Moyenn, S.I.; Das, S.K.; Ali, M.F.; et al. Critical Design and Control Issues of Indoor Autonomous Mobile Robots: A Review. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 35338–35370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Werner, T.T.; Toumbourou, T.; Maus, V.; Lucas, M.C.; Sonter, L.J.; Muhdar, M.; Runting, R.K.; Bebbington, A. Patterns of infringement, risk, and impact driven by coal mining permits in Indonesia. Ambio 2024, 53, 242–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szóstak, M.; Nowobilski, T.; Mahamadu, A.; Pérez, D.C. Unmanned aerial vehicles in the construction industry-towards a protocol for safe preparation and flight of drones. Int. J. Intell. Unmanned Syst. 2022, 11, 296–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konieczna-Fuławka, M.; Koval, A.; Nikolakopoulos, G.; Fumagalli, M.; Santas Moreu, L.; Vigara-Puche, V.; Müller, J.; Prenner, M. Autonomous mobile inspection robots in deep underground mining—The current state of the art and future perspectives. Sensors 2025, 25, 3598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Dosari, K.; Hunaiti, Z.; Balachandran, W. Systematic review on civilian drones in safety and security applications. Drones 2023, 7, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pishgar, M.; Issa, S.F.; Sietsema, M.; Pratap, P.; Darabi, H. REDECA: A Novel Framework to Review Artificial Intelligence and Its Applications in Occupational Safety and Health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawłowska, Z. Szanse i zagrożenia dla bezpieczeństwa i higieny pracy związane z wdrażaniem w przedsiębiorstwach technologii Przemysłu 4.0. Occup. Saf. Sci. Pract. 2021, 603, 24–28. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Poyyamozhi, M.; Murugesan, B.; Rajamanickam, N.; Alroobaea, R.; Nureldeen, W. Investigation of Unsafe Construction Site Conditions Using Deep Learning Algorithms Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Sensors 2024, 24, 6737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhi, O.S.; Farhan, H.M.; Kurnaz, S. Improving Oil Pipeline Surveillance with a Novel 3D Drone Simulation Using Dynamically Constrained Accumulative Membership Fuzzy Logic Algorithm (DCAMFL) for Crack Detection. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 2025, 18, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Codoceo-Contreras, L.; Rybak, N.; Hassall, M. Exploring the impacts of automation in the mining industry: A systematic review using natural language processing. Min. Technol. 2024, 133, 191–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Häikiö, J.; Kallio, J.; Mäkelä, S.; Keränen, J.S. Iot-based safety monitoring from the perspective of construction site workers. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Saf. 2020, 4, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Y.; Ye, S.; Lin, L. Process monitoring with support of iot in prefabricated building construction. Sens. Mater. 2021, 33, 1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joeaneke, P.C.; Obioha-Val, O.; Olaniyi, O.O.; Ogungbemi, O.S.; Olisa, A.O.; Akinola, O.I. Protecting Autonomous UAVs from GPS Spoofing and Jamming: A Comparative Analysis of Detection and Mitigation Techniques. J. Eng. Res. Rep. 2024, 26, 71–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerns, A.J.; Shepard, D.P.; Bhatti, J.A.; Humphreys, T.E. Unmanned Aircraft Capture and Control via GPS Spoofing. J. Field Robot. 2014, 31, 617–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, W.; Rasouli, S.; Singh, A.K.; Mohandes, S.R.; Antwi-Afari, M.F.; Cheung, C.; Manu, P.; Agrawal, U. The Adoption of UAVs for Enhancing Safety in Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review. Intell. Infrastruct. Constr. 2025, 1, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fagan, M.; Marron, J.; Brady, K.G., Jr.; Cuthill, B.B.; Megas, K.N.; Herold, R.; Lemire, D.; Hoehn, B. IoT Device Cybersecurity Guidance for the Federal Government: Establishing IoT Device Cybersecurity Requirements; NIST Special Publication 800-213; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST): Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2021. [CrossRef]
- ISO 12164-4; Artificial Intelligence—Management System. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/42001.html (accessed on 7 August 2025).
- ISO 10218-1; Robots and Robotic Devices—Exoskeletons and Exosuits—Safety Requirements and Test Methods. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2025. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/73933.html (accessed on 7 August 2025).
- ISO/TS 15066; Mining—Autonomous and Remotely Operated Machines—Functional Safety Requirements. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/62996.html (accessed on 7 August 2025).
Technology | Keywords | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mining Engineering | Results | Civil Engineering | Results | |
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and inspection robots | drone OR UAV OR robotic inspection AND mining engineering OR mining AND safety | 45 | drone OR UAV OR robotic inspection AND civil engineering OR construction industry AND safety | 34 |
Internet of Things (IoT) and sensors | IoT OR Internet of Things OR sensors AND occupational safety AND mining OR mining engineering | 68 | IoT OR Internet of Things OR sensors AND occupational safety AND civil engineering OR construction industry | 33 |
Artificial intelligence (AI) | AI OR artificial intelligence AND occupational safety AND mining OR mining engineering | 13 | AI OR artificial intelligence AND occupational safety AND civil engineering OR construction industry | 16 |
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Inspection Robots | IoT and Sensors | Artificial Intelligence | Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) | Innovative Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and Collective Protective Equipment (CPE) | Exoskeletons | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Opportunities | ||||||
Exoskeletons | Management of hazardous and emergency situations | Biomechanical data analysis; Health and fatigue monitoring; Physical and ergonomic support | Assist with high-risk physical work; Motor support; Managing fatigue and interruptions | Haptic feedback; Synchronisation of motion data | Motion support and increased worker safety | |
Innovative personal protective equipment (PPE) and collective protective equipment (CPE) | Real-time monitoring and risk assessment | Monitor and analyse the work environment in real time; Manage the operation and condition of protective equipment; Responding to hazardous and accident situations; Data analysis and prediction of hazards and accidents | Creating smart PPE and CPE; Automation of collective protection system | Compatibility of purpose with actual activities performed; Test simulations of PPE and CPE. | Lack of standards and norms; Compatibility problems with security systems | |
Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) | Creating realistic 3D environments; Reconstructing accidents; Monitoring working conditions and identifying hazards; Use of real-time AR in work environments | Integrating data from IoT devices into a VR environment; Industrial training and simulation | Machine learning for VR environment adaptation; Personalisation of VR/AR scenarios; Analysis of user response behaviour of VR/AR technologies; Risk assessment | A false sense of security; Ergonomic and health problems | Cybersecurity threats; Technical errors and physical consequences | |
Artificial intelligence | Monitoring working conditions and identifying hazards; Predicting accidents and failures; Mapping and 3D modelling of the work environment | Real-time monitoring and analysis of the work environment; Predicting accidents and failures; Access control and employee identification | Algorithmic errors; Improper data analysis; Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Qualified personnel requirement | Algorithmic errors; Improper data analysis; Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Cybersecurity threat | Algorithmic errors and improper data analysis; Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Cybersecurity threat; The complexity of technology integration | |
IoT and sensors | Real-time monitoring of the work environment; Remote inspection and control of hazardous sites; Data analysis and prediction of hazards and accidents | Reducing employee vigilance; AI misinterpretation of data; Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Cybersecurity threat; Ethical and legal issues | Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Cybersecurity threat | Unreliability of technology; Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Cybersecurity threat; Need for qualified personnel | A false sense of security; Unreliability of technology; Cybersecurity threat; The complexity of technology integration | |
Unmanned aerial vehicles and inspection robots | Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Cybersecurity threat; The complexity of technology integration; Unreliability of technology; Dependencies on communication systems | Algorithmic errors; Improper data analysis; Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Cybersecurity threat; The complexity of technology integration | A false sense of security; Technical issues and hardware compatibility; Cybersecurity threat; Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Need for qualified personnel | A false sense of security; Compatibility issues; Cybersecurity threat | Lack of standards and norms; Threats to cybersecurity; Complexity of technology integration | |
Limitations |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bęś, P.; Strzałkowski, P.; Górniak-Zimroz, J.; Szóstak, M.; Janiszewski, M. Innovative Technologies to Improve Occupational Safety in Mining and Construction Industries—Part I. Sensors 2025, 25, 5201. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25165201
Bęś P, Strzałkowski P, Górniak-Zimroz J, Szóstak M, Janiszewski M. Innovative Technologies to Improve Occupational Safety in Mining and Construction Industries—Part I. Sensors. 2025; 25(16):5201. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25165201
Chicago/Turabian StyleBęś, Paweł, Paweł Strzałkowski, Justyna Górniak-Zimroz, Mariusz Szóstak, and Mateusz Janiszewski. 2025. "Innovative Technologies to Improve Occupational Safety in Mining and Construction Industries—Part I" Sensors 25, no. 16: 5201. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25165201
APA StyleBęś, P., Strzałkowski, P., Górniak-Zimroz, J., Szóstak, M., & Janiszewski, M. (2025). Innovative Technologies to Improve Occupational Safety in Mining and Construction Industries—Part I. Sensors, 25(16), 5201. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25165201